CRITICALLY DISCUSS HOW TO CHOOSE
 BETWEEN A SERVICE CONTRACT AND A
 JOINT VENTURE FOR A 50-250 MILLION
DOLLAR OIL AND GAS TRANSACTION. CITE
  EXAMPLES FROM AFRICA AND ASIA.



                       By:
                       Emilios Frangos
                       Stephanie Polykarpou
                       Tope Ajao
                       Yasmin Ben Umar
                       Yiannis Philotheou
INTRODUCTION:
•   Joint Ventures and Service Contracts have both been chosen in the past for different
    reasons in different countries.
•    When deciding on what contract is most appropriate to use a number of factors have
    to be determined in order to make sure that the correct and most appropriate
    contract for the circumstances is applied. In order to achieve this a number of factors
    have to be examined. The following points are to be discussed in order to draw a
    conclusion during this presentation.
•   How big is the transaction that is to be discussed?
•   What is a Joint Venture
•   What is a Service Contract
•   What are the advantages and disadvantages of each.
•   Examples of application of each individual contract in different countries.
JOINT VENTURES: THE DEVELOPEMENT

• It developed when the
  Concession agreement
  disappeared.
• As a result of the Host countries
  not having an active role in their
  resources.
• The formation of OPEC
• UN resolution from 1952to 1966
  aided its development(Principle
  of Permanent Sovereignty)
PHASES OF A JOINT VENTURE

• Planning : this defines commercial rationale and identifies partners.
• Formation :here legal and commercial structures are built.
• Operation: joint venture are operated and managed on an ongoing basis.
• Dissolution: it involves winding up of JV.
LEGAL VEHICLES FOR FORMING A JOINT
VENTURE:

• Contractual Joint Venture: here no separate legal entity is formed and it
  purely a contract.
• Joint Venture Corporation: here legal affairs is incorporated. JV governed by
  corporation law of relevant state.
• Joint Venture Partnership: governed by partnership laws of relevant state. It
  can either be written or oral but usually written in the oil and gas industry.
ADVANTAGES OF JVS ON PART OF
GOVERNMENT.
• It is not alone in the decision making and
  responsibility for project.
• It counts on the expertise of a Major Oil
  Company.
• Shares profits and remunerations like
  taxes and royalties
DISADVANTAGES FOR GOVERNMENT.
• Risks and cost are also shared.
• Responsibility comes with potential liability including environmental damage.
• It takes a long time to negotiate.
• It requires more legal advice from exerts in petroleum contracts which will
  cost more for both parties.
SERVICE CONTRACTS:


• Private company perform services for the government
• Contractor provides all capital
• Is exploration is successful the costs are recovered
• All production belongs to the government
• Contractor bears all the risks
SERVICE CONTRACTS CONTINUED.
•   Types of Service Contracts:
•   Risk service contracts
•   Pure service contracts
•   Technical assistance contracts


•   Why service contracts?
•   Government has greater control over the
    project
•   The contracting company does not share any
    profit oil
•   For small reserves.
EXAMPLES OF RISK SERVICE CONTRACTS IN
ASIA AND AFRICA
EXAMPLES OF SERVICE CONTRACTS IN ASIA:

•   Coastal Energy Company
    committed itself to a Risk
    Service Contract in Malaysia
    with respect to 3 marginal fields
    involving 320million dollars for
    3years
•   See Coastal Energy Company
    presentation: Malaysian Risk
    Service Contracts(July 2012)
•   (http://www.coastalenergy.com/o
    perations/offshore-malaysia.)
EXAMPLES OF SERVICE CONTRACTS IN AFRICA

• Agip committed itself to
  service contract in Agbara
  field and Okono/okpoho fields
  in Nigeria
•   Nigeria Field Trip: Claudio Descalzi
    Senior Vice President for Operations
    Italy, Africa and Middle East E&P
    Division (October 2002)
EXAMPLES OF SERVICE CONTRACTS IN ASIA

•   Risk service contracts are called
    buyback contracts in Iran.
•   In march 1995, a buyback contract was
    awarded to Conoco for the development
    of the offshore Sirri A and E fields.
•   HOW COMPETITIVE IS THE IRANIAN BUY-BACK
    CONTRACTS IN COMPARISON TO CONTRACTUAL
    PRODUCTION SHARING FISCAL SYSTEMS? HOOMAN
    FARNEJAD ∗
•   hfarnejad@marathonoil.com
CONCLUSION:
•     As International Oil Company:
•     Service contracts seem to be more appropriate for the given circumstances
•     This has been decided on the following factors:
•     That setting up a joint venture would be way to expensive for such a relatively small
      deal. Cost of expert legal advice and time spent between IOCs to know each other
      would make service contracts a more easily acceptable choice.
•     Basically the cost involved in a modern day oil and gas joint venture deal surpasses
      100million dollars. For example, Shell Nigeria (shell petroleum development company)
      from the year 2006 – 2010 has contributed at least 31billion dollars in respect to its JV
      agreement with Nigeria.
    As a Host Country
•     In recent times, a service contract can easily apply to such a transaction involving such
      an amount. As usual, a host country would still be happy to see the IOCs bear all the
      risk involved.
REFERENCES

Contracting and regulatory issues in the oil and gas and metallic minerals industries
•   Michael Likosky
•   http://archive.unctad.org/en/docs/diaeiia20097a1_en.pdf


•   The ABCs of Petroleum Contracts: License-Concession Agreements, Joint Ventures, and
    Production-sharing Agreements
•   Jenik Radon
•   http://openoil.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Chapter-3-reading-material1.pdf


•   Joint Venture Contracts (JVCs) among Current Negotiated Petroleum Contracts: A Literature
    Review of JVCs Development, Concept and Elements by Talal Al Emadi
•   https://www.law.georgetown.edu/academics/law-journals/gjil/upload/6-al-emadiFIXED.pdf.

LLM 2013 Reading oil&gas contract law

  • 1.
    CRITICALLY DISCUSS HOWTO CHOOSE BETWEEN A SERVICE CONTRACT AND A JOINT VENTURE FOR A 50-250 MILLION DOLLAR OIL AND GAS TRANSACTION. CITE EXAMPLES FROM AFRICA AND ASIA. By: Emilios Frangos Stephanie Polykarpou Tope Ajao Yasmin Ben Umar Yiannis Philotheou
  • 2.
    INTRODUCTION: • Joint Ventures and Service Contracts have both been chosen in the past for different reasons in different countries. • When deciding on what contract is most appropriate to use a number of factors have to be determined in order to make sure that the correct and most appropriate contract for the circumstances is applied. In order to achieve this a number of factors have to be examined. The following points are to be discussed in order to draw a conclusion during this presentation. • How big is the transaction that is to be discussed? • What is a Joint Venture • What is a Service Contract • What are the advantages and disadvantages of each. • Examples of application of each individual contract in different countries.
  • 3.
    JOINT VENTURES: THEDEVELOPEMENT • It developed when the Concession agreement disappeared. • As a result of the Host countries not having an active role in their resources. • The formation of OPEC • UN resolution from 1952to 1966 aided its development(Principle of Permanent Sovereignty)
  • 4.
    PHASES OF AJOINT VENTURE • Planning : this defines commercial rationale and identifies partners. • Formation :here legal and commercial structures are built. • Operation: joint venture are operated and managed on an ongoing basis. • Dissolution: it involves winding up of JV.
  • 5.
    LEGAL VEHICLES FORFORMING A JOINT VENTURE: • Contractual Joint Venture: here no separate legal entity is formed and it purely a contract. • Joint Venture Corporation: here legal affairs is incorporated. JV governed by corporation law of relevant state. • Joint Venture Partnership: governed by partnership laws of relevant state. It can either be written or oral but usually written in the oil and gas industry.
  • 6.
    ADVANTAGES OF JVSON PART OF GOVERNMENT. • It is not alone in the decision making and responsibility for project. • It counts on the expertise of a Major Oil Company. • Shares profits and remunerations like taxes and royalties
  • 7.
    DISADVANTAGES FOR GOVERNMENT. •Risks and cost are also shared. • Responsibility comes with potential liability including environmental damage. • It takes a long time to negotiate. • It requires more legal advice from exerts in petroleum contracts which will cost more for both parties.
  • 8.
    SERVICE CONTRACTS: • Privatecompany perform services for the government • Contractor provides all capital • Is exploration is successful the costs are recovered • All production belongs to the government • Contractor bears all the risks
  • 9.
    SERVICE CONTRACTS CONTINUED. • Types of Service Contracts: • Risk service contracts • Pure service contracts • Technical assistance contracts • Why service contracts? • Government has greater control over the project • The contracting company does not share any profit oil • For small reserves.
  • 10.
    EXAMPLES OF RISKSERVICE CONTRACTS IN ASIA AND AFRICA
  • 11.
    EXAMPLES OF SERVICECONTRACTS IN ASIA: • Coastal Energy Company committed itself to a Risk Service Contract in Malaysia with respect to 3 marginal fields involving 320million dollars for 3years • See Coastal Energy Company presentation: Malaysian Risk Service Contracts(July 2012) • (http://www.coastalenergy.com/o perations/offshore-malaysia.)
  • 12.
    EXAMPLES OF SERVICECONTRACTS IN AFRICA • Agip committed itself to service contract in Agbara field and Okono/okpoho fields in Nigeria • Nigeria Field Trip: Claudio Descalzi Senior Vice President for Operations Italy, Africa and Middle East E&P Division (October 2002)
  • 13.
    EXAMPLES OF SERVICECONTRACTS IN ASIA • Risk service contracts are called buyback contracts in Iran. • In march 1995, a buyback contract was awarded to Conoco for the development of the offshore Sirri A and E fields. • HOW COMPETITIVE IS THE IRANIAN BUY-BACK CONTRACTS IN COMPARISON TO CONTRACTUAL PRODUCTION SHARING FISCAL SYSTEMS? HOOMAN FARNEJAD ∗ • hfarnejad@marathonoil.com
  • 14.
    CONCLUSION: • As International Oil Company: • Service contracts seem to be more appropriate for the given circumstances • This has been decided on the following factors: • That setting up a joint venture would be way to expensive for such a relatively small deal. Cost of expert legal advice and time spent between IOCs to know each other would make service contracts a more easily acceptable choice. • Basically the cost involved in a modern day oil and gas joint venture deal surpasses 100million dollars. For example, Shell Nigeria (shell petroleum development company) from the year 2006 – 2010 has contributed at least 31billion dollars in respect to its JV agreement with Nigeria. As a Host Country • In recent times, a service contract can easily apply to such a transaction involving such an amount. As usual, a host country would still be happy to see the IOCs bear all the risk involved.
  • 16.
    REFERENCES Contracting and regulatoryissues in the oil and gas and metallic minerals industries • Michael Likosky • http://archive.unctad.org/en/docs/diaeiia20097a1_en.pdf • The ABCs of Petroleum Contracts: License-Concession Agreements, Joint Ventures, and Production-sharing Agreements • Jenik Radon • http://openoil.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Chapter-3-reading-material1.pdf • Joint Venture Contracts (JVCs) among Current Negotiated Petroleum Contracts: A Literature Review of JVCs Development, Concept and Elements by Talal Al Emadi • https://www.law.georgetown.edu/academics/law-journals/gjil/upload/6-al-emadiFIXED.pdf.