Reaction time ppt

1
The Role Of Reaction
Time and Anticipation in
Motor Control
Presented by: Zinat Ashnagar

2
Introduction
Reaction Time
Reaction time (RT) is a measure of the time from the
arrival of a suddenly presented and unanticipated
signal to the beginning to response to it.
(motor control &learning)
Electromyographic reaction time (ERT) is the time
measured between the presentation of a stimulus and
execution of an appropriate response to that
stimulus. It has two fractions;

3
Premotor time
which is the time interval between the onset of the
stimulus and the onset of the electromyographic (EMG)
activity of the relevant muscle and is thought to represent
central processes involved in making the response (e.g.
perception, decisions).
Motor time
which is the time interval between the onset of
EMG activity and completion of the actual muscular
task and represents processes associated with
musculature itself.
(Botwinick and Thompson, 1966& Motor control and learning)

5
Motor time (MT) reflects the duration of the
electromechanical transduction within muscular fibers,
whereas premotor time (PMT) reflects the duration of
all earlier stages of information processing.
(Audiffren &Tomporowski,2008)

6
Anticipation
Spatial, or Event Anticipation
One way in which performers can anticipate future activities is
by knowing what kind of stimuli are going to be presented and
what kind of responses will be required.
Temporal Anticipation
The anticipation of when a given stimulus will arrive or when a
movement is to be made
Foreperiod
The interval between a warning signal and the stimulus to
respond

7
Simple Reaction Time (SRT)
Reaction time from a task in which a single known response is
produced when a single stimulus is presented.
Choice Reaction Time (CRT)
Reaction time for a task in which each response to be made is
associated with a different stimulus.
Choice RT task is often employed, preventing the subject from
knowing what stimulus is going to occur; or foreperiods are
randomized so that the subject cannot predict when the stimulus
will arrive.

8
Reaction time measures are common in many sport settings; an
example is the interval between the starter’s gun and the first
movement in a swimming race. Reaction time measures are also
studied extensively in the laboratory as measures of information-
processing speed.
Reaction time (RT) is a highly sensitive and objective
parameter reflecting cognitive and motor function and
was used in several studies
(Milner, 1986; Turhanoglu and Beyazova,2003).

9
Most of the studies use computer based methods to
measure RT instead of electromyography
Lord et al., 1993;
Lord and Castell, 1994;
Arcelin et al., 1998;
Brisswalter et al., 1997;
Arcelin and Brisswalter, 1999;
Collardeau et al., 2001a,b;
Whitehurst, 1991.
Such techniques yield total reaction time rather than
premotor time.
(Crabtree and Antrim, 1988)
As premotor time reflects cognitive function, it is preferable
to measure it selectively, apart from motor time. For this
purpose EMG can be used. (Taskiran &gunendi,2008)

10
Reaction time measures are very common in research on
skills, for two basic reasons.
First, RT measures are components of real life tasks
(e.g.,Sprint starts).
A more important reason is that RT presumably measures the
time taken for mental events, such as stimulus processing
,decision making, and movement programming.
These two motivations for using RT measures differ
considerably.
In the first case, RT is a measure studied for it’s own sake.
In the second case, RT allows the researcher to understand
the kinds of mental processes that lead to movement.
(e.g. ,posner,1978)
(Motor control & learning)

11
Reaction times and anticipatory
skills of karate athletes
Shuji Mori a,*, Yoshio Ohtani b, Kuniyasu Imanaka a
a Department of Kinesiology, Graduate School of Science, Tokyo
Metropolitan University,
1-1 Minami- Ohsawa, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan
b Faculty of Engineering and Design, Kyoto Institute of Technology,
Matsugasaki,
Sakyo- ku, Kyoto 606-8585, Japan
Human Movement Science 21 (2002) 213–230
www.elsevier.com/locate/humov

12
Successful performance in sport requires not only efficient
execution of motor behavior but also a high level of
perceptual ability
In sport science, two types of perceptual abilities have
been considered relevant to the player’s successful
performance.
One is primitive, basic sensory functions which are not
specific to particular types of sport expertise
The other type of perceptual processing is sport-specific
perceptual skills

13
Research has demonstrated that expert sport players are superior to
novices in perceptual skills, such as detecting the presence of a ball
in briefly presented sport scenes
(Allard & Starkes, 1980; Starkes, 1987);
making efficient search for relevant, informative parts of the
opponent’s body and fields
(Abernethy & Russell, 1987; Goulet, Bard, & Fleury, 1989; Ripoll, Kerlirzin,
Stein, & Reine, 1995; Williams, Davids, Burwitz,& Williams, 1994);
anticipating the ball direction and the opponent’s action from
advance information
(Abernethy, 1990; Jones & Miles, 1978; Paull & Glencross,1997; Williams &
Davids, 1998);
The expert advantage in perceptual skills has been typically
investigated by sport-specific realistic stimuli and tasks
(e.g., judging future actions in filmed sequences of real play).

14
Karate is a good example of a competitive sport with high levels of
temporal and spatial constraints which require fast reactions.
The need to offend and defend against the opponents should lead
karate athletes to develop their perceptual abilities, i.e. karate-specific
perceptual skills and/or non-specific basic sensory functions, to make
fast reactions
A few studies have used simplistic stimuli and tasks to assess the
possible advantage of karate athletes in basic sensory functions
A couple of studies by Williams and his colleagues have used more
realistic stimuli and tasks to examine expertise anticipation of karate
athletes, which is one important aspect of perceptual skill
(Scott, Williams, & Davids, 1993; Williams &Elliott, 1999).
In both studies, the stimuli were dynamic film displays of karate
athletes
performing offensive attacks against the viewer.

15
Scott et al. (1993) found that karate athletes showed faster RTs than
novices for both verbal and action response modes, while the athletes
showed higher accuracy only with the action mode.
In contrast, Williams and Elliott (1999) showed, in a similar experiment
using the action response mode, that the expert karate athletes were no
faster than the novices, while the athletes were more accurate than the
novices.
there appears to be no coherent picture concerning the advantage of
expert karate athletes in RT tasks.
The present study was designed to obtain a better understanding of the
expertise advantage of karate athletes
For this purpose, we followed a so-called multi-task approach
(Williams et al., 1999), in which the performances of expert and novice
players are examined across multiple types of tasks and stimuli.

16
The multitask approach has been proved quite useful to reveal expert
superiority in various motor and perceptual abilities, the latter including
basic sensory functions and perceptual skills
(e.g., Helsen & Starkes, 1999; Reilly, Williams, Nevill, & Franks,2000; Starkes, 1987)
In the first experiment of the present study, we measured RTs from the
same group of expert athletes and novices, using two types of stimuli,
realistic and simplistic, and two types of response tasks, choice RT
and simple RT.
The realistic stimuli were dynamic displays of karate athletes
performing offensive actions against the viewer
The target positions of the offensive actions were either the upper (‘joh-
dan’) or middle (‘chu-dan’) level of the opponent (viewer)
The simplistic stimuli were presentations of a single dot at either
an upper or lower location in the stimulus display

17
In the choice RT task, the participants were required
to indicate as soon and as accurately as possible the target location of
the attack,
or the presentation location of the dot.
 In the simple RT task, the participants responded as soon as
possible when the video stimulus started to move from a static display,
or when the dot appeared on the monitor
 realistic (i.e., video-stimulus choice-RT task)
 simplistic (i.e., dot- and video-stimulus simple RT tasks
and dot-stimulus choice RT task)
In the second experiment, we attempted to examine anticipation of
the karate athletes in a paradigm other than an RT task.

18
Chamberlain and Coelho (1993) suggested that in sport-specific situations,
novices might be less confident than experts and require a longer time
for making decisions
This suggests that the RT task in the first experiment may include a possible
advantage of the karate athletes in decision making, in addition to their
superior anticipatory skill.
To evaluate this possibility, we used a temporal occlusion method, where the
participants were given unlimited time to judge as accurately as possible the
target positions of the attacks which were occluded before their completion
If the results of this experiment corroborate the RT data of the first
experiment, showing a higher accuracy of judgments by the athletes, this
would constitute strong evidence that the karate athletes are superior to
the novices in anticipatory skills regarding the attack.

21
Experiment 1
Method
Participants :Six collegiate karate athletes (mean age of 21 in the range of
19–22) and seven novices (mean age of 28 in the range of 21–43), all
males and right handed, participated in this experiment.
Four of the athletes had 4–6 yrs of experience of karate training, all with
black belts, and the other two had about 1 yr of experience.
The novices, including the first and the second authors (ages 39 and 43,
respectively), had no experience of karate training but possessed basic
knowledge of karate
Apparatus and stimuli
All stimuli were presented on a high-resolution color monitor (SONY
MultiscanGDM-17SE2T), with a screen size of 31 23 cm, controlled by a
personal computer (COMPAQ DeskPro 5100) with a color graphic system
which also controlled the experimental timing, RT measurement and
recording from a custom-made response box.

22
For the video stimuli, offensive actions of three karate athletes with black
belts were recorded by a digital video camera (SONY DCR-TRV10)
the video camera was positioned at the height of 1.7 m and approximately
2 m away from the athlete’s initial position.
This camera position simulated the eye level and viewing distance of
karate athletes in real sparring situations, so that the video-recorded
pictures would replicate actual scenes of the offensive actions against
the viewer
(Scott et al., 1993; Williams& Elliott, 1999).
In recording, the three athletes performed separately. Facing the
camera, the athletes first took a ready stance, then executed the
offensive action against a virtual opponent standing at the camera
position.

23
They demonstrated thrusting punches and kicks several times, from both
left and right sides, each action being aimed either at the upper or the
middle level.
From the recording of their performance, 50 actions (half of them aimed at
the upper level, the other half at the middle level) were chosen as the stimuli
to be presented in the experiment.
Each stimulus was edited in a form of successive pictures, or frames, and
presented at 33 ms per frame on the monitor.
the numbers ranged from 13 to 20 frames which corresponded to stimulus
durations of 430–660 ms. They showed no systematic difference between
the actions aimed at the upper level and at the middle level.
For the dot stimuli, a black filled circle (1.5 cm in diameter) was
presented on a white background.

24
In the choice RT task, the circle was presented at either, approximately, 7
cm above or below the center of the screen
In the simple RT task, the circle was always presented at the center of the
screen.
Procedure
The experiment was conducted in a dark booth, where the participants
were seated with their head fixed on a chin rest while viewing the CRT
screen binocularly. There were four conditions, two stimulus types
(video and dot)2 RT tasks (choice and simple).
In the video-stimulus choice-RT condition, each trial started with
1-s presentation of a fixation point at the center of the screen, followed by
1-s presentation of the first frame of a stimulus, showing a static display of
the athlete’s ready stance.

25
the action started with successive presentations of the frames
(beginning
from the first frame) at the rate of 33 ms/frame.
The participants were asked to decide, as soon and accurately as
possible, whether the offensive action in the stimulus would come to the
upper or the middle level of their body.
The response was made on a response box, pressing one key by a
finger of the right hand for the upper level and the other key by a finger
of the left hand for the middle level
(cf., Scott et al., 1993; Williams & Elliott, 1999).
RTs were measured from the onset of the second frame to the key
press. The stimulus presentation was terminated by the key press and
replaced with a blank screen
There were five experimental sessions of 50 trials each, with the 50
different stimuli presented once in each session in a random order.
For each participant, sessions with less than 90% correct responses
were discarded and replaced with new sessions.
As a result, four of the athletes group and three of the novice group had
to perform one or two extra sessions

26
In the video-stimulus simple-RT condition, the stimulus
presentation was identical to that of the choice-RT condition, except that
the duration of the static ready stance display varied randomly from 1 to 3
s. This served as a random foreperiod as typically used in simple RT
tasks (Luce, 1986).
The key press was made by either the left or right hand, in an approximately
equal number of trials within a session.
There were two sessions of 50 trials each, with random presentations of the
50 stimuli in each session.
In the dot-stimulus choice-RT condition, each trial started with an
1-s blank interval of white background, after which the dot was presented
for 33 ms at either an upper or a lower location on the screen, followed by
a blank white background.

27
The participants were asked to report the location as soon and
accurately as possible, by pressing one key with the right hand for the
upper location or the other key with the left hand for the lower location.
RTs were measured from the onset of the dot presentation to the key
press. There were two sessions of 125 trials each.
In the dot-stimulus simple-RT condition, the duration of the blank
interval varied from 1 to 3 s randomly across trials, after which the dot
was presented for 33 ms at the center of the screen, followed by a blank
screen.
The participant’s task was to press a key as soon as the dot was
presented. This condition was employed in one session of 100 trials.

29
Results
 The most notable is the very slow RTs of the video-stimulus choice-
RT condition; they are more than twice as slow as RTs of any other
condition.
The second slowest is the dot-stimulus choice-RT condition.
On visual inspection there appears to be no difference between the two
simple-RT conditions.
For all the conditions, the mean RTs were faster for the athlete group than
for the novice group.
For both groups, the choice RTs were significantly slower than the
simple RTs in the two stimulus conditions
For both groups, the choice RTs were slower in the video than in the
dot condition but there was no difference in simple RT

30
The choice RTs were faster for the athlete group than for the novice
group in the video and the dot conditions, but the simple RTs did not
differ between the two groups for either stimulus condition
In the choice RT conditions, proportions of correct responses
(PCRs) for either
type of stimulus were higher than 90% for each participant, and mean
PCRs were identical for the two participant groups:
both groups yielded 94.7% for the video stimuli and nearly 100% for
the dot stimuli
The lack of difference in PCR between the two groups and the higher
PCRs of both groups for the dot stimuli (with the faster RTs) than for the
video stimuli clearly indicate the absence of contamination of
speed-accuracy trade-off in the choice RT data.

31
Additional analysis
 First, possible learning effects on the choice RTs
for the video stimuli
 Second, differences due to the hands used for key
pressing
An inspection of individual data showed that the choice
RTs tended to be faster for later sessions.
The lack of interaction indicates that the learning effects
were not different between the two groups

32
the participants were all right-handed and used their right hands to
respond to the upper location throughout the choice RT tasks, the RT
data may have been contaminated by possible advantages of right-hand
key presses and differences in the advantage between the athletes and
the novices.
The choice RT data of both groups may have been
contaminated by right-hand advantages of about 10 ms,
indicated by their simple RTs, although the conclusions due to
their differences in choice RT are not subject to the right-hand
advantage, which did not differ between the two groups.

33
Discussion
Despite the relatively small number of participants in the athlete and
the novice groups, the results are clear.
The superiority of the athletes was evident in the video stimulus
choice-RT condition.
The athletes were faster but no more accurate than the novices,
consistent with the results of Scott et al. (1993) with the verbal action
mode.
The approximately 100-ms advantage of the athletes is ascribed to
their superior anticipation of the opponent’s attacking position
It thus seems that the novices, as well as the karate athletes,
anticipated the target area of the opponent’s attack, although the
100-ms delay in choice RT reflects inferiority of the novices’
anticipatory skills.

34
The athletes were also slightly but significantly faster in the dot-stimulus
choice-RT condition.
This suggests that, in addition to the superior anticipatory skill, they have
a better ability to make quick discriminations of two vertical locations.
Why the athletes are better at the discrimination, and whether their better
discrimination is specific to vertical locations or ubiquitous in space and
other dimensions (e.g., Nougier et al., 1992; Whiting & Hutt, 1972) are not
clear.
One possibility is that the karate athletes have learned offensive and
defensive techniques in terms of vertical levels (upper, middle, lower), so
they may have become sensitive to vertical differences in space.
In contrast, the lack of significant difference in simple RT between
the two groups, for either the dot or the video stimuli, implies that the
athletes are no better than the novices in visual detection of a single
dot or of any change in the static display of the opponent’s ready
stance.

35
Experiment 2
Method
The apparatus was the same as in Experiment 1. The stimuli were identical
to the 50 video stimuli of Experiment 1, except that their presentation was
cut off at the seventh frame.
This cut-off point was chosen in consideration of results of a preliminary
experiment, which showed that the presentation of the first seven frames
were sufficient for the karate athlete to make correct decisions in more than
90% of trials.
The time sequence of one trial was similar to that of Experiment 1 with the
video stimuli, except that after the seventh frame, the stimulus was
replaced with a blank screen.
After the stimulus presentation on each trial, the participants were given
unlimited time to decide as accurately as possible whether the offensive
action would be aimed at the upper or the middle level

36
Results and discussion
The mean PCR of the athlete group was 96% which was significantly
higher than that of the novice group, 80%.
This corroborates the results of Experiment 1 and supports that the faster
RTs of the athletes in the video-stimulus choice-RT condition was due to
their anticipatory skills, not to their decision making.
anticipatory skills consist of (at least) two processes;
extracting information from the early motion of the opponent’s
attack and
estimating from that information the target area (upper or middle) of
the attack.

37
In this experiment, the information extracted by the first process was
limited to the first seven frames of the video stimuli.
That the mean PCR of the athlete group is close to their value in the
video-stimulus choice-RT condition of Experiment 1 (94.7%; for the four
black-belts, 95.2%) suggests that their extraction process in the choice
RT task was also confined to around the first seven frames, even
though the subsequent frames were presented in the experiment
On the other hand, the mean PCR of the novices was lower than their
value in the choice RT task (94.7%, identical to the athletes’).

38
In conjunction with the 100-ms delay of the choice RT from the athletes,
this suggests that the extraction process of the novices worked on the first
10 frames, which corresponded to three extra frames, or a 100-ms delay
(33 ms per frame), from the seventh frame suggested for the karate
athletes.
Accordingly, presenting only the first seven frames lowered their PCR in
this experiment.
Therefore, the main difference between the athletes and the novices
seems to be in the information-extraction process, and not in the
estimation process, of their anticipatory skills.

39
additional points
First, cutting off every stimulus at the seventh frame may not be
adequate because, as noted in Experiment 1, the stimuli may differ in
minimum viewing time (or frames) necessary for the correct decisions.
The termination at the seventh frame might be too short, or too long, for
some of the stimuli.
An alternative is to cut off each stimulus at the frame corresponding to
its minimum viewing time.
This is difficult to do in practice, however, because finding the minimum
time for each of the 50 stimuli requires a series of experiments with
careful manipulation of the viewing time and, even if we do this, the
minimum viewing times would differ among participants.

40
Second, because the same participants had taken part in Experiment 1,
their prior exposure to the same set of stimuli may have contributed to the
result of this experiment.
One possibility is that the karate athletes may have better memory of
karate-related events than novices, and the athlete’s clearer memory of the
video stimuli, acquired from Experiment 1, may have helped their decisions
in this experiment.
Better recalls of sport-specific items by expert players have been reported
in karate (Hodge & Deakin, 1998) as well as in other sports
(Allard et al., 1980; Williams & Davids, 1995), and the results of Experiment 1
showed learning effects for the athletes as well as the novices.
Further research will be needed to explore the possible effects of
specialized memory possessed by karate athletes.

41
General discussion
Experiment 1 showed that:
the athletes responded faster than the novices in the video-stimulus
choice-RT condition, which simulated the real stimuli and task of karate,
indicating superior anticipation of the athletes regarding the opponent’s
attack
(Scott et al., 1993; Williams & Elliott,1999).
The athletes were also slightly but significantly faster in the dot-stimulus
choice-RT condition, which was probably due to their better ability of
vertical discrimination
The athletes were not different from the novices in simple RT to either
dot or video stimuli, suggesting that the athletes were no better in
visual detection not specific to karate.

42
These results are consistent with a general consensus of sport
research that the advantage of expert players is most evident in tasks
with realistic settings that assess sport-specific perceptual skills, while
their advantage is relatively small or non-existent in simplistic tasks
used to examine basic sensory functions
(Borgeaud & Abernethy, 1987; Helsen & Starkes, 1999;Starkes,1987).
Experiment 2 provided supporting evidence for the athletes’ superior
anticipation.
In the temporal occlusion paradigm, the athletes were more accurate than
the novices in decision making regarding the opponent’s attack.
This result not only supports that the athletes’ faster RTs in Experiment 1
was due to their anticipation based on the early part of the opponent’s
attack, rather than to their decision making (Chamberlain & Coelho, 1993),
but it also suggests that the main advantage of the athletes may be in
extracting necessary information from the opponent’s motion.

43
These findings of the athletes’ anticipation fit well with practical aspects
of karate, which place a great emphasis on the role of anticipation.
Anticipation is particularly important in defence, for avoiding the
opponent’s attack and for taking a proper position prior to the contact
(Wilk et al., 1983), which reduces significantly the damage from the attack.
Some training is focused on anticipating the opponent’s attack
(Egami, 1976).
It has been suggested that experience in training and games would
enhance the athletes’ karate-specific knowledge base, resulting in their
superior anticipation (Williams & Elliott, 1999)
some issues remain unanswered:
One concerns cues in the opponent’s action that are used by karate
athletes to anticipate the target location of the attack.
Such cues may include changing positions of body parts (head, hands,
feet etc.), concerting movements of those parts, or even gaze
directions

44
Williams and Elliott (1999) recorded the participant’s eye movement
during the RT task and found that both the athletes and the novices
tended to fixate on the head and the chest of the attacking athletes
in the video rather than on the arms and the fists.
They suggested that the athletes, as well as the novices, used the central
regions (i.e., head and chest) of the opponent’s body as ‘‘visual pivots’’ to
distribute their attention over peripheral regions (also see Ripoll et al.,
1995).
Although this is an interesting suggestion regarding search strategy for
anticipatory cues, it is not yet entirely clear what spatial and temporal
aspects of the opponent’s motion serve as reliable cues for quickly and
accurately anticipating the location of the forthcoming attack.

45
In Experiment 2 of the present study, we proposed that the athletes
extract critical information from the first seven frames of the video
stimulus, while the novices required 10 frames.
This proposal fits the present data but needs to be verified with further
experiments.
Particularly, the exact number of frames necessary for them to reach a
certain level of accuracy should be specified.
One way to answer these questions is to manipulate the spatial and
temporal occlusions of the videotaped opponent’s actions in the
occlusion paradigm, which has been used in studies
of other sports to identify advance cues utilized by expert players
(e.g., Abernethy, 1990; Abernethy & Russell, 1987; for a review, see Williams et al.,
1999).

46
Another issue is the differences between RTs in laboratory settings and
actions in real situations.
In Experiment 1, the athletes’ choice RTs to the video stimuli (mean
552 ms) are comparable to the completion time of videotaped offensive
actions (430– 660 ms), which means that their reactions would be too
slow in real defensive situations.
This points to important differences between the laboratory settings of
the present study and the conditions of real situations.
One is the response mode to the opponent’s attack.
In the present study the athletes responded by a key press, while in
real situations they would make defensive actions (blocking), which
would be more natural for them to act against the opponent’s attack
and probably faster than the key press.
The other is the presentation sequence of the offensive actions. In the
present study, as well as in the study by Williams and Elliott (1999),
the participants were randomly presented with separate actions of the
three opponents.

47
This is quite different from real situations, where each athlete is faced
with one opponent for some period of time, so that the previous actions
of the opponent may provide useful information for forthcoming attacks
and facilitate defensive actions in terms of speed and accuracy
Another possibility is that in real situations, it may be too late once an
opponent starts an offensive action.
It is emphasized in the practice of karate to keep a proper distance
(‘maai’) from an opponent, in order to prevent the opponent from
making attacks.
Anticipation alone may be insufficient and need to be coupled with other
defensive strategies, such as keeping a proper distance.
These points will be investigated in field studies or in laboratories with
more realistic settings.

48
Visual search, anticipation and
expertise in soccer
goalkeepers
GEERT J.P. SAVELSBERGH,1,2* A. MARK WILLIAMS,3 JOHN VAN DER
KAMP1 and PAUL WARD3
1Research Institute for Fundamental and Clinical Human Movement
Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam,
The Netherlands, 2Centre for Biophysical and Clinical Research into
Human Movement, Department of Exercise
and Sports Science, The Manchester Metropolitan University, Alsager, UK
and 3Research Institute for Sport and
Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
Journal of Sports Sciences, 2002, 20,
Journal of Sports Sciences, 2002, 20, 279± 287

49
Expert soccer goalkeepers demonstrate highly skilled and well coordinated
behaviour when diving or jumping to catch the ball.
Such skilled behaviour requires many years of practice (Ericsson et al.,
1993), allied to a considerable amount of ability (Singer and Janelle, 1999).
It is now accepted that successful performance in such sports requires skill
in perception as well as the efficient and accurate execution of movement
patterns (see Williams et al., 1999).
A player’ s ability to use advance postural cues is particularly important
in fast ball sports where the speed of play and ball velocity dictate that
decisions must often be made in advance of the action.
High-speed film analysis indicates that players who react to the ball, as
opposed to anticipating its intended destination, are unlikely to be
successful (Glencross and Cibich, 1977).

50
In most previous studies, static slide displays have been used (e.g.
Tyldesley et al., 1982) and participants were required to perform discrete
rather than continuous actions in response to these stimuli (e.g. Williams
and Burwitz, 1993; Franks and Hanvey, 1997).
The information contained in static displays has been shown to be less
sensitive and discriminating than that provided by dynamic film or live
models (Bourgeaud and Abernethy, 1987).
In particular, the relative motions presented in dynamic action sequences
may be crucial to anticipation in sport (Abernethy et al., 2001; Ward et al.,
2002). Similarly, the typical response requirements have varied from
pressing a button (Tyldesley et al., 1982; Neumaier et al., 1987; Franks and
Hanvey, 1997) to written (McMorris et al., 1993; Williams and Burwitz, 1993;
McMorris and Colenso, 1996) or verbal responses (Salmela and Fiorito, 1979).

51
In such circumstances, corrections or modifications to the response are
not possible as the display unfolds, unlike the real performance setting
where players have the opportunity to modify their actions continuously.
The ability to make ongoing corrections has gained increasing importance
since the recent rule change that allows goalkeepers to move across the
goal line before the ball is struck by the penalty taker.
The present study embraces new technology in an attempt to determine
key differences in visual search behaviour and anticipatory performance
between expert and novice soccer goalkeepers.
The study was undertaken from a perception-action perspective, where
information is presumed to evolve over time, and where action is
continuously coupled to the perceptual information presented
(see Savelsbergh and Van der Kamp, 2000).

52
In this innovative paradigm, visual information is picked up in a continuous
rather than discrete fashion and the response is not measured by a button
press, but by means of a joystick linked to a potentiometer to ensure
continuous data sampling.
This procedure allows corrections to be made to the response in an
ongoing manner as the flow of information changes across early and late
periods in the penalty kick.

53
Methods
Participants
Fourteen players provided informed consent before participating in
the study. The expert group consisted of seven soccer goalkeepers
aged 29.9 ± 7.1 years who had played semi-professional football
(second division of the National League) in the Netherlands for a
minimum of 10 years.
The novices included seven goalkeepers aged 21.3 ± 1.4 years who
had played soccer less frequently for recreation.
Test film
Ten professional youth players aged 18.9 ± 1.5 years were filmed
from the goalkeeper’s perspective taking penalty kicks.
The film clips were recorded using a digital video camera positioned
in the middle of the goal at a height of 1.77 m

54
A sailcloth (2.42 ´ 1.50 m) was hung from a regulation crossbar to indicate the area
to which the players had to shoot.
Six different target areas (0.81 ´ 1.50 m) were painted on the sailcloth, as
highlighted in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. The goal divided into six areas for placement of penalties and
joystick movements.

55
The players were told to try and disguise the intended destination of the
penalty kick, as they would in normal competition.
Each film clip included the penalty taker’ s approach to the ball, their
actions before and during ball contact, and the first portion of ball flight.
Two penalties were recorded in each target location for every player,
providing a total of 120 trials.
A microphone was attached to the sailcloth to indicate the moment at
which the ball crossed the goal line; a second microphone was positioned
near the penalty spot to record the moment of ball± foot contact.
These two temporal measures were used to calculate the flight time and
velocity for each penalty kick. The average ball flight time was 648 ms,
whereas the mean ball velocity was 16.8m´s-1.

56
Apparatus
The film clips were back-projected (EIK CC-7000),using a reflective surface to
increase image size, onto a large screen (2.29 ´ 2.27 m) positioned 3.45 m from
the participant. The experimental layout is represented graphically in Fig. 2
Fig. 2. A side view of the experimental set-up.

57
The image of the penalty taker subtended a visual angle of approximately
8° at
foot± ball impact, thereby closely simulating the real image size and
distance between the goalkeeper and the penalty spot.
The response movements performed by the participants were recorded
using a hand-held joystick.
The joystick (Dual Axis Farnell M11Q61P) was positioned at waist height
just in front of the participant.
The joystick signal was amplified and stored on computer by means of
LABVIEW (version 5.1).
Visual search behaviours were recorded using an eye± head
integration system that included an Applied Science Laboratories
(ASL) 4000SU eye-tracker and an Ascension Technologies
magnetic head-tracker (model: 6DFOB).

58
They had to anticipate the direction of each penalty kick quickly and
accurately by moving the joystick as if to intercept the ball.
Procedure
The participants were allowed to use the joystick to make corrections
to their initial decision as the penalty kick evolved.
Before the penalties were presented, a non-task-specific test was
undertaken to determine whether there were `baseline’ differences in
simple reaction time between the two groups.

59
After familiarization and habituation, 30 film clips were presented; five
penalties in each location.
Half of the film clips involved a left-footed penalty taker; the remaining
trials involved right-footed players.

60
Dependent variables and analysis
Penalties saved
Correct side
Correct height
Proportion of corrections.
Time of initiation of joystick movement.
Reaction time.

61
Results
Experts Novices
Penalties stopped 35.7 ± 11.8 25.9 ± 10.8
Correct height 42.6 ± 8.9 32.6 ± 8.2
Correct side 83.8 ± 11.8 71.4 ± 8.2
Proportion of
corrections
26.3 ± 4.9 38.5 ± 15.3
Time of initiation of
joystick movement
(ms)
296 ± 46.6 480 ± 29.2
Reaction time (ms) 258 ± 33.1 237 ± 46.4
Table 1. The dependent measures recorded on the
anticipation test across groups (mean ± s)

62
Discussion
As predicted, the expert goalkeepers generally demonstrated better
performance on the anticipation test than their novice counterparts.
The experts were also more accurate than the novices in predicting
penalty kick side (83.8 vs 71.4%) and height (38.5 vs 26.3%).
Both groups of players were more accurate in predicting the
correct side rather than height of the penalty kick (77.6 and 37.9%,
respectively).

63
The expert goalkeepers initiated their joystick movements later or
nearer to foot± ball contact than the novices and made corrections on
fewer trials
Rodrigues et al. (1999) showed that skilled table tennis players are
able to `buy extra time’ relative to less skilled performers by taking
the ball later during its approach, compensating for this delay by
adopting shorter movement times

64
The novices spent longer fixating on the trunk, arm and hip regions as
the penalty kick evolved, whereas the experts preferred to fixate their
gaze on the kicking leg, non-kicking leg and ball areas.
The expert goalkeepers also spent longer fixating on the head region,
particularly early on, although this may reflect a tendency to try and
recognize facial characteristics early in the action sequence.
Franks and Hanvey (1997) argued that the non-kicking foot is positioned
so that it points towards the ball’s likely destination, while Williams and
Burwitz (1993) proposed that the angle of the foot relative to the ball
during the downswing phase provides a strong indication of intended ball
placement.

65
both groups of players spent long periods fixating on `unclassified’
areas of the display.
This suggests that participants chose to anchor the fovea close to
these key locations so that they could use the parafovea and
visual periphery to pick up relevant information.
The effective use of such `visual pivots’ by experts has been
demonstrated in a variety of sports (see Ripoll et al., 1995; Williams
and Davids, 1998; Williams and Elliott,1999).

66
Another important area for future consideration is whether goalkeepers’
anticipatory performance at penalty kicks can be improved through
perceptual training.
Video simulation may prove particularly effective as a method of
developing perceptual skill, particularly when coupled with
appropriate instructional techniques
(McMorris and Hauxwell, 1997; Williams and Burwitz, 1993)

67
Expert goalkeepers have superior perceptual skills to their novice
counterparts.
Experts are quicker and more accurate in anticipating the likely destination
of a penalty kick and systematic differences in visual search behaviours
were apparent across groups.
although the paradigm used in this study is more realistic than in
previous research, further innovations are required to accurately
simulate the performance setting.
These innovations could include whole-body response measures and
the manipulation of emotional states such as anxiety and motivation.

68
Testing and Training
Anticipation Skills in
Softball Fielders
Tim Gabbett1, Martin Rubinoff1, Lachlan
Thorburn1
and Damian Farrow2
1Queensland Academy of Sport,
2Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra Australia
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching Volume 2 · Number 1 · 2007

74
Studies have shown that the anticipatory skill of team sport athletes
can be learned through the use of video-based perceptual training.
Introduction
However, while several studies have assessed anticipation skills in
the laboratory, few studies have determined whether these
improvements in anticipatory skill transfer to performance
improvements in the real-world environment of a game-specific
situation.
A measure of transfer is essential to determine whether the
improvements observed in the laboratory setting actually transfer
back to the game situation.

75
Studies often neglect to perform a retention test to determine whether
improvements in anticipatory skill can be retained after the training stimulus
is removed.
Softball is a sport that requires superior anticipatory skill, both from an
offensive (i.e,pitch recognition) and defensive (i.e., fielding)
perspective.
while several studies have investigated perceptual skill of these athletes
from an offensive perspective (i.e., pitch recognition), no study has
trained anticipation skills in softball fielders in an attempt to improve the
ability to identify specific cues of a batter that might indicate the
direction that the ball may be hit.

76
The Purpose of this study:
develop an ecologically valid anticipation test for
softball in-fielders
assess the validity and reliability of the anticipation
test
Determine whether a video-based perceptual
training stimulus could improve anticipatory skill in
softball fielders,
whether these improvements in anticipatory skill
transferred to
the field environment.

77
Method
Testing was performed in three parts:
Firstly, the validity of the test was determined by
testing national, state, and club level softball players, and by
comparing results across different playing positions.
Secondly, the reliability of the test was determined.
Finally, players participated in a four-week training program to
determine if fielding anticipation skills could be learned through
the use of a video-based training stimulus.

78
SOFTBALL ANTICIPATION TEST
The athlete’s decision accuracy and decision time were measured in
the laboratory using a ‘life-like’ video-based test of a batter shown
from the perspective of the in-fielder.
For the softball fielding anticipation test, a data projector (NEC LT245) was
positioned on the floor 5 m back from a wall.
A video image of a batter was projected on to the wall, so that the image
of the player was approximately 1.80 m tall and reflective of a typical elite
softball player’s physical stature.
Six occlusion periods were used:
t1 (-120 ms), t2 (- 80ms), t3 (- 40ms), t4 (0 ms), t5 (+ 40 ms),
and t6 (+ 80 ms).

79
A high-speed video camera interfaced with a video recorder,
was positioned 5 m behind the subject in order to record the
subject’s change of movement direction relative to the moment of
ball contact (display occlusion).
Video was sampled at 200 Hz so that the number of frames
between the moment of display occlusion and the player’s movement
initiation enabled the player’s decision-making time to be recorded to
within ± 5 ms for each trial.

80
RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
Ten state players performed the anticipation test on two
occasions, two days apart, to determine the reliability of the test.
The validity of the anticipation test to discriminate among players
of different playing ability was evaluated by testing national (n = 21),
state (n = 10) and novice (n = 9) softball players.
In addition, the validity of the anticipation test was determined
by comparing different playing positions (in-fielders, pitchers,
and out-fielders).

81
TRAINING
Twenty-five elite female softball players were randomly allocated to:
(i) a video-based perceptual training group (n = 9);
(ii) a placebo training group (n = 8);
(iii) a control group (n = 8).
The perceptual training group watched temporally occluded video
footage focused primarily on identifying specific cues of a batter
that might indicate the direction that the ball may be hit

82
Athletes performed 30 trials each session. At the commencement of each
session, athletes were instructed to focus their attention on a particular
aspect of the batter (e.g. hands, hips, or bat head, etc).
During training sessions, athletes watched the occluded video once, and
then the same un-occluded video immediately afterwards, to provide
feedback on where the ball was actually hit.
Twelve training sessions, each of 10 minutes duration, were conducted over a
four-week period between the pre- and post-testing sessions.
The placebo training group watched a series of arrows that randomly
directed them to move left or right.
Athletes were instructed to make a small movement in the direction
the arrow was pointing as soon as they saw the arrow.
The control group performed no video-based training in the intervention period.

83
TRAINING TRANSFER TEST
The athlete’s decision accuracy and decision time were measured
in the laboratory pre- and post-intervention using the ‘life-like’
video-based test.
In addition, the athlete’s decision accuracy and decision time were
measured in the field pre- and post-intervention to determine if
anticipation skills could be transferred to the field setting.
RETENTION TEST
The athlete’s decision accuracy and decision time were measured
in the laboratory and the field following a four-week period where
no video-based training was performed.
(i.e. retention test).

84
RESULTS
RELIABILITY
The Test and Re-Test measurements of decision accuracy and decision time
proved to be reliable.
VALIDITY
The decision accuracy and decision time results for the national, state, and club
level softball players are presented in Figure 1.

87
CHANGES WITH VIDEO-BASED PERCEPTUAL TRAINING

88
Figure 3. Fielding Anticipation Skills for the Video-Based
Perceptual Training Group, Placebo Group, and Control Group,
Before Training, After 4 Weeks of Training, and Following a 4-week
Non-Training (Retention) Period.
The laboratory test results are presented in panel A, while the field
test results are presented in panel B. Data are reported as mean ±
SE.
* Significantly different (P<0.05) from pre-training.
† Significantly different (P<0.05) from placebo and control group.
‡ Significantly different (P<0.05) from control group.

89
DISCUSSION
these results demonstrate that video-based perceptual training
improves decision accuracy and decision times in a game-specific
task, with these improvements in anticipatory skill transferring to
the field environment.
These findings suggest that video-based perceptual training should
be used in conjunction with field training to enhance the
anticipatory skill of softball fielders.
The finding of superior anticipatory skill in the national level players of the
present study suggests that these players had a greater ability to extract
relevant information earlier in the visual display, by identifying relevant
postural cues presented by the batter, and disregarding irrelevant sources
of information.

90
the placebo group showed no meaningful changes in decision
accuracy or decision times.
These findings demonstrate that the use of a non-sport specific
stimulus (i.e. directional arrows) that randomly direct players to
move left or right does not improve the anticipatory skill of softball
fielders, and is consistent with previous perceptual training research
that has highlighted the importance of providing a sport specific
stimulus when attempting to improve an athlete’s perceptual skill.
Video-based perceptual training improved fielding anticipation skills
by improving both decision accuracy and decision time in the
laboratory task.
These findings are in agreement with others who have reported
improvements in perceptual skill following short-term training in
tennis, squash, baseball, American football, soccer, volleyball, and
basketball players.

91
While decision accuracy of the video-based perceptual training
group improved from pre-training (74.1%) to post-training (93.8%),
no meaningful changes were detected for decision times.
These findings suggest that more than 4 weeks of training may be
required to elicit improvements in decision time in softball fielders.
Furthermore, while we found that these improvements in anticipatory skill
were retained following a four-week, non-training period, without continual
training, no further improvements were made.
These findings suggest that regular perceptual training is required to elicit
further improvements in anticipatory skill in softball fielders.

Reaction time ppt

More Related Content

What's hot

Viewers also liked

Similar to Reaction time ppt

More from Zinat Ashnagar

Recently uploaded

Reaction time ppt