The document discusses limit state design of reinforced concrete structures. It defines two main limit states - limit state of collapse and limit state of serviceability. Limit state of collapse deals with strength and stability under maximum loads, while serviceability deals with deflection, cracking and durability under service loads. Characteristic loads have a 95% probability of not being exceeded and are factored up using partial safety factors for design loads. Material strengths are reduced using partial safety factors to calculate design strengths. The document also derives design coefficients for moment of resistance, depth of neutral axis and percentage steel reinforcement for rectangular sections under flexure.
IRJET- Comparision between Experimental and Analytical Investigation of Cold ...IRJET Journal
This document compares the experimental and analytical investigation of the structural behavior of cold formed steel angle sections under tension loading. 108 specimens of different cold formed steel angle sections with varying thicknesses were tested experimentally. The ultimate loads from the experiments were then compared to the predicted loads from several international design codes - Australian/New Zealand standard AS/NZS 4600-2005, American Iron and Steel Institute AISI Manual from 2001, and British Standard BS 5950-1998 Part 5. In general, the codes provided conservative predictions of the ultimate loads compared to the experimental values. Tables 1 and 2 show examples of the comparison between experimental and predicted ultimate loads for various angle section specimens.
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel StructureArshia Mousavi
A library room, whose structural steel members are to be checked in fire conditions (in terms of bearing capacity, R criterion).
The aims of this project are as follows:
1. Design of the beam and the column at room temperature
a) design the beam capacity at the ULS and the check the deflection at the SLS (d ≤ L1/250 in the rare combination) b) design the column for its buckling resistance.
2. Design the beam fire protection (boards) for the required fire resistance under the quasi-permanent load
the combination and assuming a three-sided exposure (concrete deck on top)
suggested steps: design load under fire
ultimate load of the beam at time = 0
ductility class
global failure or just a critical section?
increased capacity of the critical sections by the adaptation factors degree of utilization of the structure (or the critical section)
critical temperature.
protection design & final check.
3. Design the column fire protection
for the required fire resistance under the quasi- permanent load combination (optional: accounting for the effect of the thermal elongation of the beam).
suggested steps: design load under fire
thermal elongation of the beam assessment of the equivalent. uniform moment critical temperature (spreadsheet file)
protection design & final check
If needed, the member cross-sections designed at room temperature may be adjusted in order to meet the required fire resistance (parts 2 and 3)
The document discusses various masonry design codes and philosophies. It explains that limit states design (LSD) is considered the most rational as it considers both safety under ultimate loads and serviceability under service loads, unlike working stress method (WSM) and ultimate load method (ULM). LSD has been adopted by most modern codes like ACI, IBC, and Eurocode. The document then discusses provisions for axial load, shear, and other limit states in different codes based on LSD and allowable stress design (ASD) formats.
04-LRFD Concept (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)Hossam Shafiq II
The document discusses load and resistance factor design (LRFD) methods for structural design. It provides information on:
1) Types of loads that must be considered in design like dead, live, and environmental loads. Load factors are used to increase calculated loads to account for uncertainties.
2) Resistance factors are used to reduce nominal member strength to account for variability in material strength and dimensions.
3) The LRFD method aims for a 99.7% reliability target where factored resistance must exceed factored loads based on load combinations outlined in codes.
Steel is widely used for structures due to its strength, light weight, and fast construction. This document introduces steel design based on the limit state method per Indian codes. It describes rolled steel sections like beams, channels, angles, and plates used in design. Key properties of structural steel like yield strength and ductility are discussed. The limit state method involves checking strength and serviceability limits under different load combinations and safety factors to ensure safety and comfort over the structure's lifetime.
Shaft design Erdi Karaçal Mechanical Engineer University of GaziantepErdi Karaçal
This document discusses the design of an industrial railway car shaft that is subjected to various loading conditions including bending, torsion, axial loading, and shear. The author performs both static failure analysis and fatigue failure analysis to size the shaft diameter. For fatigue analysis, the author calculates stress concentration factors and endurance limits. An initial diameter of 37.63mm is obtained from static analysis, which is then checked against fatigue analysis criteria. The final recommended diameter is 58mm, providing a safety factor of 1.55 when accounting for torsional loads in addition to bending. Deflection analysis is also performed to evaluate the shaft deformation.
This document provides an introduction to steel and timber structures. It discusses the objectives of the chapter, which are to introduce structural steel, describe common structural members and shapes, explain structural design concepts and material properties of steel. It outlines different types of steel structures, why steel is used, various structural members, and design methods like allowable stress design, plastic design and limit state design. Key material properties of structural steel like its stress-strain behavior and grades are also summarized.
Design of Beam- RCC Singly Reinforced BeamSHAZEBALIKHAN1
Concrete beams are an essential part of civil structures. Learn the design basis, calculations for sizing, tension reinforcement, and shear reinforcement for a concrete beam.
IRJET- Comparision between Experimental and Analytical Investigation of Cold ...IRJET Journal
This document compares the experimental and analytical investigation of the structural behavior of cold formed steel angle sections under tension loading. 108 specimens of different cold formed steel angle sections with varying thicknesses were tested experimentally. The ultimate loads from the experiments were then compared to the predicted loads from several international design codes - Australian/New Zealand standard AS/NZS 4600-2005, American Iron and Steel Institute AISI Manual from 2001, and British Standard BS 5950-1998 Part 5. In general, the codes provided conservative predictions of the ultimate loads compared to the experimental values. Tables 1 and 2 show examples of the comparison between experimental and predicted ultimate loads for various angle section specimens.
Fire Resistance of Materials & Structures - Analysing the Steel StructureArshia Mousavi
A library room, whose structural steel members are to be checked in fire conditions (in terms of bearing capacity, R criterion).
The aims of this project are as follows:
1. Design of the beam and the column at room temperature
a) design the beam capacity at the ULS and the check the deflection at the SLS (d ≤ L1/250 in the rare combination) b) design the column for its buckling resistance.
2. Design the beam fire protection (boards) for the required fire resistance under the quasi-permanent load
the combination and assuming a three-sided exposure (concrete deck on top)
suggested steps: design load under fire
ultimate load of the beam at time = 0
ductility class
global failure or just a critical section?
increased capacity of the critical sections by the adaptation factors degree of utilization of the structure (or the critical section)
critical temperature.
protection design & final check.
3. Design the column fire protection
for the required fire resistance under the quasi- permanent load combination (optional: accounting for the effect of the thermal elongation of the beam).
suggested steps: design load under fire
thermal elongation of the beam assessment of the equivalent. uniform moment critical temperature (spreadsheet file)
protection design & final check
If needed, the member cross-sections designed at room temperature may be adjusted in order to meet the required fire resistance (parts 2 and 3)
The document discusses various masonry design codes and philosophies. It explains that limit states design (LSD) is considered the most rational as it considers both safety under ultimate loads and serviceability under service loads, unlike working stress method (WSM) and ultimate load method (ULM). LSD has been adopted by most modern codes like ACI, IBC, and Eurocode. The document then discusses provisions for axial load, shear, and other limit states in different codes based on LSD and allowable stress design (ASD) formats.
04-LRFD Concept (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)Hossam Shafiq II
The document discusses load and resistance factor design (LRFD) methods for structural design. It provides information on:
1) Types of loads that must be considered in design like dead, live, and environmental loads. Load factors are used to increase calculated loads to account for uncertainties.
2) Resistance factors are used to reduce nominal member strength to account for variability in material strength and dimensions.
3) The LRFD method aims for a 99.7% reliability target where factored resistance must exceed factored loads based on load combinations outlined in codes.
Steel is widely used for structures due to its strength, light weight, and fast construction. This document introduces steel design based on the limit state method per Indian codes. It describes rolled steel sections like beams, channels, angles, and plates used in design. Key properties of structural steel like yield strength and ductility are discussed. The limit state method involves checking strength and serviceability limits under different load combinations and safety factors to ensure safety and comfort over the structure's lifetime.
Shaft design Erdi Karaçal Mechanical Engineer University of GaziantepErdi Karaçal
This document discusses the design of an industrial railway car shaft that is subjected to various loading conditions including bending, torsion, axial loading, and shear. The author performs both static failure analysis and fatigue failure analysis to size the shaft diameter. For fatigue analysis, the author calculates stress concentration factors and endurance limits. An initial diameter of 37.63mm is obtained from static analysis, which is then checked against fatigue analysis criteria. The final recommended diameter is 58mm, providing a safety factor of 1.55 when accounting for torsional loads in addition to bending. Deflection analysis is also performed to evaluate the shaft deformation.
This document provides an introduction to steel and timber structures. It discusses the objectives of the chapter, which are to introduce structural steel, describe common structural members and shapes, explain structural design concepts and material properties of steel. It outlines different types of steel structures, why steel is used, various structural members, and design methods like allowable stress design, plastic design and limit state design. Key material properties of structural steel like its stress-strain behavior and grades are also summarized.
Design of Beam- RCC Singly Reinforced BeamSHAZEBALIKHAN1
Concrete beams are an essential part of civil structures. Learn the design basis, calculations for sizing, tension reinforcement, and shear reinforcement for a concrete beam.
Comparison of Seismic Resistance of Moment Resisting RC Building using Shear ...IRJET Journal
This study compares the seismic resistance of a G+9 reinforced concrete building using shear walls and bracing systems. Six models are analyzed: a bare frame, three with shear walls in different locations, and three with X-bracing in different locations. Response spectrum analysis is used to evaluate the models based on base shear, storey displacement, and inter-storey drift. Both shear walls and bracing increase the building's stiffness and strength compared to the bare frame. Shear walls perform better than bracing in reducing displacements and drifts. Placing the lateral systems at the building corners provides the best seismic performance with a small increase in dead load. Shear walls are also more cost-effective than bracing.
The document discusses structural design considerations for steel structures. It covers:
1. Factors that must be considered in arranging structural components, such as functional requirements, environmental factors, and soil conditions.
2. Advantages of steel structures such as smaller sections, homogeneity, and availability of pre-rolled sections.
3. Limit states design methodology and factors considered, such as load and material factors, compared to allowable stress design.
4. Common structural elements, sections, and connections used in steel structures.
Modal analysis determines the natural vibration characteristics of a structure. Natural frequency depends on mass, stiffness, and boundary conditions, and is important to understand possible resonance. Resonance occurs when natural frequency coincides with excitation frequency, and can cause excessive deformation. The document provides an example modal analysis of a simply supported aluminum plate, calculating its natural frequencies. Finite element analysis is used to model the system and structures are substantiated to have sufficient margin of safety under limit loads.
The document provides an overview of limit state design for reinforced concrete structures. It discusses key concepts such as limit states, partial safety factors, and serviceability requirements. Limit states include strength and serviceability limits related to factors like material strength, stability, fatigue, deflection, and vibration. Partial safety factors account for uncertainties in loads and material strengths. Serviceability requirements place limits on deflections and vibrations under service loads. The document outlines the general principles of limit state design specified in Indian code IS 800.
Ch3 Design Considerations (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. M...Hossam Shafiq II
This chapter discusses design considerations for steel bridges. It outlines two main design philosophies: working stress design and limit states design. The chapter then focuses on the working stress design method, which is based on the Egyptian Code of Practice for Steel Constructions and Bridges. It provides allowable stress values for various steel grades and loading conditions, including stresses due to axial, shear, bending, compression and tension loads. Design of sections is classified based on compact and slender criteria. The chapter also addresses stresses from repeated, erection and secondary loads.
This document provides an overview of basic design considerations for machine components. It discusses general design procedures and considerations, types of loads, stress-strain diagrams, types of stresses including tensile, compressive, shear, crushing, bearing, torsional, and bending stresses. It also covers concepts related to stress concentration, creep, fatigue, endurance limit, factor of safety, and theories of failure under static loads. Standard classifications and designations of various steel and alloy types are also presented.
To Study Weld Strength and Strain Energy Absorption of Roll Over Protection S...IOSR Journals
The roll over protection structure, referred as ROPS is designed to protect the driver from the injuries caused by roll-overs. In addition to safety against roll-overs and collisions, it also acts as a single rugged base for mounting the sub-systems of the all terrain vehicle. This study will deals with edge preparation techniques employed prior to welding to strengthen the ROPS and corresponding strain energy absorption at the time of collision. The design of ROPS depends on the vehicle size, weight distribution, sub-system mounting, occupant's safety and ergonomics; followed by force analysis under specified crash conditions.
This document discusses the limit state method for designing reinforced concrete beams. It describes key concepts like limit states, stress-strain curves for concrete and steel, and the parameters used to calculate the depth of the neutral axis and moment of resistance. There are three main types of reinforced concrete beams discussed: singly reinforced, doubly reinforced, and singly or doubly reinforced flanged beams. The document focuses on the design and analysis of singly reinforced beams, providing examples of determining the moment of resistance of a given cross-section, as well as designing a beam to resist a specific bending moment.
This experimental work aims at presenting load-deflection expressions for the
concrete beams that reinforced with three different reinforcement ratios of ACI 318-
14, which are minimum, maximum and the average of them. Three groups of beams
were cast, each group contained three beam specimens. Three types of loading are
used, 1-concentrated force, 2-concentrated forces and partial uniformly distributed
load. It is also seen that, when reinforcing ratio increases from minimum to
maximum, in case of 1-concentrated force, ultimate capacity increases by about 280%
and deflection decreases by about 33%, respectively. Whereas, in case of 2-
concentrated forces, ultimate capacity increases by about 258% and deflection
decreases by about 50%, respectively. Finally, in case of uniformly distributed load,
ultimate capacity increases by about 289% and deflection decreases by about 28%,
respectively.
This experimental work aims at presenting load-deflection expressions for the concrete beams that reinforced with three different reinforcement ratios of ACI 318-14, which are minimum, maximum and the average of them. Three groups of beams were cast, each group contained three beam specimens. Three types of loading are used, 1-concentrated force, 2-concentrated forces and partial uniformly distributed load. It is also seen that, when reinforcing ratio increases from minimum to maximum, in case of 1-concentrated force, ultimate capacity increases by about 280% and deflection decreases by about 33%, respectively. Whereas, in case of 2-concentrated forces, ultimate capacity increases by about 258% and deflection decreases by about 50%, respectively. Finally, in case of uniformly distributed load, ultimate capacity increases by about 289% and deflection decreases by about 28%, respectively.
This experimental work aims at presenting load-deflection expressions for the
concrete beams that reinforced with three different reinforcement ratios of ACI 318-
14, which are minimum, maximum and the average of them. Three groups of beams
were cast, each group contained three beam specimens. Three types of loading are
used, 1-concentrated force, 2-concentrated forces and partial uniformly distributed
load. It is also seen that, when reinforcing ratio increases from minimum to
maximum, in case of 1-concentrated force, ultimate capacity increases by about 280%
and deflection decreases by about 33%, respectively. Whereas, in case of 2-
concentrated forces, ultimate capacity increases by about 258% and deflection
decreases by about 50%, respectively. Finally, in case of uniformly distributed load,
ultimate capacity increases by about 289% and deflection decreases by about 28%,
respectively.
Cost Optimization of a Tubular Steel Truss Using Limit State Method of DesignIJERA Editor
Limit state method helps to design structures based on both safety and serviceability. The structures are designed to withstand ultimate loads or the loads at which failure occurs unlike working stress method where only service loads are considered. This leads to enhanced safety. Also unlike the working stress method, the structures are economical. It is also better than ultimate load method as serviceability requirement is also taken care of by considering various safety factors for all the load types and structures do not undergo massive deflection and cracks. For tubular sections, higher strength to weight ratio could result in upto 30% savings in steel .Due to the high torsional rigidity and compressive strength, Tubular sections behave more efficiently than conventional steel section This study is regarding the economy, load carrying capacity of all structural members and their corresponding safety measures.
The document discusses limit state design of reinforced concrete structures. It introduces limit states as conditions where the structure becomes unfit for use, including limit states of strength and serviceability. Limit state design involves characterizing loads and resistances as random variables and using partial safety factors on loads and resistances to achieve a target reliability. The document outlines the general principles of limit state design according to Indian Standard code IS 800, including defining actions, factors governing strength limits, and serviceability limits related to deflection, vibration and durability.
The document discusses various mechanical properties of materials including:
1) Ultimate strength is the maximum stress a material can withstand before fracturing.
2) Yield strength is the maximum stress before permanent deformation occurs.
3) Modulus of elasticity is the ratio of stress to strain in the linear region.
It also discusses allowable stress which is determined using a factor of safety applied to the yield or ultimate strength to ensure stresses do not exceed yield strength and accounts for flaws. An example calculates the minimum cable diameter required to safely support a 200lb load from 300ft.
This document discusses reinforced concrete design. It covers topics such as constituent materials and properties, basic principles, analysis methods, strength of concrete, stress-strain curves, modulus of elasticity, assumptions in design, failure modes, design philosophies, safety provisions, structural elements, and analysis of reinforced concrete sections. Flexural failure modes and equations of equilibrium for reinforced concrete design are also presented.
IRJET- Comparative Study of Super-Structure Stability Systems for Economic Co...IRJET Journal
The document compares the structural analysis and design of three slab systems - flat slab, waffle slab, and conventional slab - for a 36x36m building with column spacing variations of 6x6m, 9x9m, and 12x12m and 10 stories high. ETABS and SAFE software are used to model and analyze the systems. Manual calculations are also performed for member sizing. The slab systems are designed for different column spacings to determine the most economical system based on material usage. Analysis includes modeling the structures, assigning loads, performing design checks, and iterating member sizes as needed. Reinforcement quantities, concrete volumes, and costs are then compared between the systems and spacings to find the overall
The document provides an introduction to limit state design for reinforced concrete structures. It discusses key concepts such as limit states, partial safety factors, and serviceability limits. The key points covered are:
1) Limit state design involves ensuring structures can withstand loads during their design life without failure or unacceptable damage/deflection. Limit states include strength and serviceability limits.
2) Partial safety factors account for uncertainties in loads and material strengths, with different factors for actions and resistance.
3) Serviceability limits place restrictions on deflections and vibrations to ensure user comfort and prevent damage.
A Comparative Seismic Evaluation of GFRP Reinforced and Steel Reinforced Conc...IRJET Journal
The document compares the seismic performance of GFRP reinforced and steel reinforced concrete buildings using ETABS software. A G+3 storey building with 3.5m floor height was modeled and analyzed using equivalent static analysis in both longitudinal and transverse directions. Results for storey shear, lateral displacement, and storey drift under different load combinations are presented. The analysis found that the GFRP reinforced building experienced 11-15% higher displacements and drifts compared to the steel reinforced building. However, the storey shears were similar. In conclusion, GFRP reinforcement can be used as an alternative to steel but results in slightly higher deformations under seismic loads.
This document provides an overview of the design of beams and one-way slabs for flexure, shear, and torsion according to IS 456. It discusses key concepts like requirements for flexural reinforcement, minimum and maximum reinforcement limits, clear cover, deflection control, and selection of member sizes. The document also includes a worked example showing the step-by-step design of a rectangular reinforced concrete beam for flexure. Design checks are performed to check for strength and deflection requirements. Modules for the course will cover analysis and design of beams, one-way slabs, and reinforcement detailing in accordance with limit state design principles and code specifications.
Comparison of Seismic Resistance of Moment Resisting RC Building using Shear ...IRJET Journal
This study compares the seismic resistance of a G+9 reinforced concrete building using shear walls and bracing systems. Six models are analyzed: a bare frame, three with shear walls in different locations, and three with X-bracing in different locations. Response spectrum analysis is used to evaluate the models based on base shear, storey displacement, and inter-storey drift. Both shear walls and bracing increase the building's stiffness and strength compared to the bare frame. Shear walls perform better than bracing in reducing displacements and drifts. Placing the lateral systems at the building corners provides the best seismic performance with a small increase in dead load. Shear walls are also more cost-effective than bracing.
The document discusses structural design considerations for steel structures. It covers:
1. Factors that must be considered in arranging structural components, such as functional requirements, environmental factors, and soil conditions.
2. Advantages of steel structures such as smaller sections, homogeneity, and availability of pre-rolled sections.
3. Limit states design methodology and factors considered, such as load and material factors, compared to allowable stress design.
4. Common structural elements, sections, and connections used in steel structures.
Modal analysis determines the natural vibration characteristics of a structure. Natural frequency depends on mass, stiffness, and boundary conditions, and is important to understand possible resonance. Resonance occurs when natural frequency coincides with excitation frequency, and can cause excessive deformation. The document provides an example modal analysis of a simply supported aluminum plate, calculating its natural frequencies. Finite element analysis is used to model the system and structures are substantiated to have sufficient margin of safety under limit loads.
The document provides an overview of limit state design for reinforced concrete structures. It discusses key concepts such as limit states, partial safety factors, and serviceability requirements. Limit states include strength and serviceability limits related to factors like material strength, stability, fatigue, deflection, and vibration. Partial safety factors account for uncertainties in loads and material strengths. Serviceability requirements place limits on deflections and vibrations under service loads. The document outlines the general principles of limit state design specified in Indian code IS 800.
Ch3 Design Considerations (Steel Bridges تصميم الكباري المعدنية & Prof. Dr. M...Hossam Shafiq II
This chapter discusses design considerations for steel bridges. It outlines two main design philosophies: working stress design and limit states design. The chapter then focuses on the working stress design method, which is based on the Egyptian Code of Practice for Steel Constructions and Bridges. It provides allowable stress values for various steel grades and loading conditions, including stresses due to axial, shear, bending, compression and tension loads. Design of sections is classified based on compact and slender criteria. The chapter also addresses stresses from repeated, erection and secondary loads.
This document provides an overview of basic design considerations for machine components. It discusses general design procedures and considerations, types of loads, stress-strain diagrams, types of stresses including tensile, compressive, shear, crushing, bearing, torsional, and bending stresses. It also covers concepts related to stress concentration, creep, fatigue, endurance limit, factor of safety, and theories of failure under static loads. Standard classifications and designations of various steel and alloy types are also presented.
To Study Weld Strength and Strain Energy Absorption of Roll Over Protection S...IOSR Journals
The roll over protection structure, referred as ROPS is designed to protect the driver from the injuries caused by roll-overs. In addition to safety against roll-overs and collisions, it also acts as a single rugged base for mounting the sub-systems of the all terrain vehicle. This study will deals with edge preparation techniques employed prior to welding to strengthen the ROPS and corresponding strain energy absorption at the time of collision. The design of ROPS depends on the vehicle size, weight distribution, sub-system mounting, occupant's safety and ergonomics; followed by force analysis under specified crash conditions.
This document discusses the limit state method for designing reinforced concrete beams. It describes key concepts like limit states, stress-strain curves for concrete and steel, and the parameters used to calculate the depth of the neutral axis and moment of resistance. There are three main types of reinforced concrete beams discussed: singly reinforced, doubly reinforced, and singly or doubly reinforced flanged beams. The document focuses on the design and analysis of singly reinforced beams, providing examples of determining the moment of resistance of a given cross-section, as well as designing a beam to resist a specific bending moment.
This experimental work aims at presenting load-deflection expressions for the
concrete beams that reinforced with three different reinforcement ratios of ACI 318-
14, which are minimum, maximum and the average of them. Three groups of beams
were cast, each group contained three beam specimens. Three types of loading are
used, 1-concentrated force, 2-concentrated forces and partial uniformly distributed
load. It is also seen that, when reinforcing ratio increases from minimum to
maximum, in case of 1-concentrated force, ultimate capacity increases by about 280%
and deflection decreases by about 33%, respectively. Whereas, in case of 2-
concentrated forces, ultimate capacity increases by about 258% and deflection
decreases by about 50%, respectively. Finally, in case of uniformly distributed load,
ultimate capacity increases by about 289% and deflection decreases by about 28%,
respectively.
This experimental work aims at presenting load-deflection expressions for the concrete beams that reinforced with three different reinforcement ratios of ACI 318-14, which are minimum, maximum and the average of them. Three groups of beams were cast, each group contained three beam specimens. Three types of loading are used, 1-concentrated force, 2-concentrated forces and partial uniformly distributed load. It is also seen that, when reinforcing ratio increases from minimum to maximum, in case of 1-concentrated force, ultimate capacity increases by about 280% and deflection decreases by about 33%, respectively. Whereas, in case of 2-concentrated forces, ultimate capacity increases by about 258% and deflection decreases by about 50%, respectively. Finally, in case of uniformly distributed load, ultimate capacity increases by about 289% and deflection decreases by about 28%, respectively.
This experimental work aims at presenting load-deflection expressions for the
concrete beams that reinforced with three different reinforcement ratios of ACI 318-
14, which are minimum, maximum and the average of them. Three groups of beams
were cast, each group contained three beam specimens. Three types of loading are
used, 1-concentrated force, 2-concentrated forces and partial uniformly distributed
load. It is also seen that, when reinforcing ratio increases from minimum to
maximum, in case of 1-concentrated force, ultimate capacity increases by about 280%
and deflection decreases by about 33%, respectively. Whereas, in case of 2-
concentrated forces, ultimate capacity increases by about 258% and deflection
decreases by about 50%, respectively. Finally, in case of uniformly distributed load,
ultimate capacity increases by about 289% and deflection decreases by about 28%,
respectively.
Cost Optimization of a Tubular Steel Truss Using Limit State Method of DesignIJERA Editor
Limit state method helps to design structures based on both safety and serviceability. The structures are designed to withstand ultimate loads or the loads at which failure occurs unlike working stress method where only service loads are considered. This leads to enhanced safety. Also unlike the working stress method, the structures are economical. It is also better than ultimate load method as serviceability requirement is also taken care of by considering various safety factors for all the load types and structures do not undergo massive deflection and cracks. For tubular sections, higher strength to weight ratio could result in upto 30% savings in steel .Due to the high torsional rigidity and compressive strength, Tubular sections behave more efficiently than conventional steel section This study is regarding the economy, load carrying capacity of all structural members and their corresponding safety measures.
The document discusses limit state design of reinforced concrete structures. It introduces limit states as conditions where the structure becomes unfit for use, including limit states of strength and serviceability. Limit state design involves characterizing loads and resistances as random variables and using partial safety factors on loads and resistances to achieve a target reliability. The document outlines the general principles of limit state design according to Indian Standard code IS 800, including defining actions, factors governing strength limits, and serviceability limits related to deflection, vibration and durability.
The document discusses various mechanical properties of materials including:
1) Ultimate strength is the maximum stress a material can withstand before fracturing.
2) Yield strength is the maximum stress before permanent deformation occurs.
3) Modulus of elasticity is the ratio of stress to strain in the linear region.
It also discusses allowable stress which is determined using a factor of safety applied to the yield or ultimate strength to ensure stresses do not exceed yield strength and accounts for flaws. An example calculates the minimum cable diameter required to safely support a 200lb load from 300ft.
This document discusses reinforced concrete design. It covers topics such as constituent materials and properties, basic principles, analysis methods, strength of concrete, stress-strain curves, modulus of elasticity, assumptions in design, failure modes, design philosophies, safety provisions, structural elements, and analysis of reinforced concrete sections. Flexural failure modes and equations of equilibrium for reinforced concrete design are also presented.
IRJET- Comparative Study of Super-Structure Stability Systems for Economic Co...IRJET Journal
The document compares the structural analysis and design of three slab systems - flat slab, waffle slab, and conventional slab - for a 36x36m building with column spacing variations of 6x6m, 9x9m, and 12x12m and 10 stories high. ETABS and SAFE software are used to model and analyze the systems. Manual calculations are also performed for member sizing. The slab systems are designed for different column spacings to determine the most economical system based on material usage. Analysis includes modeling the structures, assigning loads, performing design checks, and iterating member sizes as needed. Reinforcement quantities, concrete volumes, and costs are then compared between the systems and spacings to find the overall
The document provides an introduction to limit state design for reinforced concrete structures. It discusses key concepts such as limit states, partial safety factors, and serviceability limits. The key points covered are:
1) Limit state design involves ensuring structures can withstand loads during their design life without failure or unacceptable damage/deflection. Limit states include strength and serviceability limits.
2) Partial safety factors account for uncertainties in loads and material strengths, with different factors for actions and resistance.
3) Serviceability limits place restrictions on deflections and vibrations to ensure user comfort and prevent damage.
A Comparative Seismic Evaluation of GFRP Reinforced and Steel Reinforced Conc...IRJET Journal
The document compares the seismic performance of GFRP reinforced and steel reinforced concrete buildings using ETABS software. A G+3 storey building with 3.5m floor height was modeled and analyzed using equivalent static analysis in both longitudinal and transverse directions. Results for storey shear, lateral displacement, and storey drift under different load combinations are presented. The analysis found that the GFRP reinforced building experienced 11-15% higher displacements and drifts compared to the steel reinforced building. However, the storey shears were similar. In conclusion, GFRP reinforcement can be used as an alternative to steel but results in slightly higher deformations under seismic loads.
This document provides an overview of the design of beams and one-way slabs for flexure, shear, and torsion according to IS 456. It discusses key concepts like requirements for flexural reinforcement, minimum and maximum reinforcement limits, clear cover, deflection control, and selection of member sizes. The document also includes a worked example showing the step-by-step design of a rectangular reinforced concrete beam for flexure. Design checks are performed to check for strength and deflection requirements. Modules for the course will cover analysis and design of beams, one-way slabs, and reinforcement detailing in accordance with limit state design principles and code specifications.
Sri Guru Hargobind Ji - Bandi Chor Guru.pdfBalvir Singh
Sri Guru Hargobind Ji (19 June 1595 - 3 March 1644) is revered as the Sixth Nanak.
• On 25 May 1606 Guru Arjan nominated his son Sri Hargobind Ji as his successor. Shortly
afterwards, Guru Arjan was arrested, tortured and killed by order of the Mogul Emperor
Jahangir.
• Guru Hargobind's succession ceremony took place on 24 June 1606. He was barely
eleven years old when he became 6th Guru.
• As ordered by Guru Arjan Dev Ji, he put on two swords, one indicated his spiritual
authority (PIRI) and the other, his temporal authority (MIRI). He thus for the first time
initiated military tradition in the Sikh faith to resist religious persecution, protect
people’s freedom and independence to practice religion by choice. He transformed
Sikhs to be Saints and Soldier.
• He had a long tenure as Guru, lasting 37 years, 9 months and 3 days
Height and depth gauge linear metrology.pdfq30122000
Height gauges may also be used to measure the height of an object by using the underside of the scriber as the datum. The datum may be permanently fixed or the height gauge may have provision to adjust the scale, this is done by sliding the scale vertically along the body of the height gauge by turning a fine feed screw at the top of the gauge; then with the scriber set to the same level as the base, the scale can be matched to it. This adjustment allows different scribers or probes to be used, as well as adjusting for any errors in a damaged or resharpened probe.
This study Examines the Effectiveness of Talent Procurement through the Imple...DharmaBanothu
In the world with high technology and fast
forward mindset recruiters are walking/showing interest
towards E-Recruitment. Present most of the HRs of
many companies are choosing E-Recruitment as the best
choice for recruitment. E-Recruitment is being done
through many online platforms like Linkedin, Naukri,
Instagram , Facebook etc. Now with high technology E-
Recruitment has gone through next level by using
Artificial Intelligence too.
Key Words : Talent Management, Talent Acquisition , E-
Recruitment , Artificial Intelligence Introduction
Effectiveness of Talent Acquisition through E-
Recruitment in this topic we will discuss about 4important
and interlinked topics which are
Open Channel Flow: fluid flow with a free surfaceIndrajeet sahu
Open Channel Flow: This topic focuses on fluid flow with a free surface, such as in rivers, canals, and drainage ditches. Key concepts include the classification of flow types (steady vs. unsteady, uniform vs. non-uniform), hydraulic radius, flow resistance, Manning's equation, critical flow conditions, and energy and momentum principles. It also covers flow measurement techniques, gradually varied flow analysis, and the design of open channels. Understanding these principles is vital for effective water resource management and engineering applications.
Levelised Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) Calculator ManualMassimo Talia
The aim of this manual is to explain the
methodology behind the Levelized Cost of
Hydrogen (LCOH) calculator. Moreover, this
manual also demonstrates how the calculator
can be used for estimating the expenses associated with hydrogen production in Europe
using low-temperature electrolysis considering different sources of electricity
Tools & Techniques for Commissioning and Maintaining PV Systems W-Animations ...Transcat
Join us for this solutions-based webinar on the tools and techniques for commissioning and maintaining PV Systems. In this session, we'll review the process of building and maintaining a solar array, starting with installation and commissioning, then reviewing operations and maintenance of the system. This course will review insulation resistance testing, I-V curve testing, earth-bond continuity, ground resistance testing, performance tests, visual inspections, ground and arc fault testing procedures, and power quality analysis.
Fluke Solar Application Specialist Will White is presenting on this engaging topic:
Will has worked in the renewable energy industry since 2005, first as an installer for a small east coast solar integrator before adding sales, design, and project management to his skillset. In 2022, Will joined Fluke as a solar application specialist, where he supports their renewable energy testing equipment like IV-curve tracers, electrical meters, and thermal imaging cameras. Experienced in wind power, solar thermal, energy storage, and all scales of PV, Will has primarily focused on residential and small commercial systems. He is passionate about implementing high-quality, code-compliant installation techniques.
Determination of Equivalent Circuit parameters and performance characteristic...pvpriya2
Includes the testing of induction motor to draw the circle diagram of induction motor with step wise procedure and calculation for the same. Also explains the working and application of Induction generator
1. Unit - III Limit State Design
Objectives of Design:
Every material of the total structure takes part effectively for form, function,
aesthetics, strength as well as safety anddurability.
1. The structures should have an acceptable probability of performing
satisfactorily during their intended life:- There are uncertaintiesin the design
process both in the estimation of the loads likely to be applied on the structure
and in the strength of the material.
2. The designed structure should sustain all loads and deform within limits for
construction and use: - Adequate strengths and limited deformations are the
two requirements of the designed structure. The structure should have
sufficient strength and the deformations must be within prescribed limits due
to all loads during construction and use. However, has to ensure that the
failure of the structures in case of any over loading should give sufficient time
for the occupants to vacate. The structures, thus, should give sufficient
warning to the occupants and must not fail suddenly.
3 The designed structures should be durable.
4. The designed structures should adequately resist to the effects of misuse
and fire.
Characteristic load: Characteristic load is that load which has a 95%
probability of not being exceeded during the life of the structure. The loads
are predicted based on probabilistic / statistical approach, where it is assumed
that the variation of the loads acting on structures follows the normal
distribution. Characteristic load should be more than the average/mean load.
Characteristic load = Average/mean load + K x(standard deviation for load)
The value of K is assumed such that the actual load does not exceed the
characteristic load during the life of the structure in 95 per cent of the cases.
'-••• iiu..-
Ar.».»-0 45
*
2
A-. ., <) ,,S
R
V
R
K
K
D
K
C
E
N
a
g
P
u
r
Limit state of
collapse
It deals with strength and
stability of the structure
under maximum design load
it state of
serviceability
It deals with deflection and cracking
under service loads, durability under
working environment, fire resistance etc.
There are two main limit states: (i) limit state of collapse and (ii) limit state of
serviceability.
(i) Limit state of collapse deals with the strength and stability of structures
subjected to the maximum design loads out of the possible combinations of
several types of loads. Therefore, this limit state ensures that neither any part
nor the whole structure should collapse or become unstable under any
combination of expected overloads.
(ii) Limit state of serviceability deals with deflection and cracking of
structures under service loads, durability under working environment during
their anticipated exposure conditions during service, stabilityof structures as a
whole, fire resistance etc.
All relevant limit states have to be considered in the design to ensure adequate
degree of safety and serviceability. The structure shall be designed on the
basis of the most critical limit state and shall be checked for other limit states
Partial safety factors:
(i) Structures are subjected to overloading. Hence, structures should be
designed with loads obtained by multiplying the characteristic loads with
suitable factors of safety. These factors of safety for loads are termed as
partial safety factors (yf) for loads.
(Design load, Fd) = (Characteristic load F)x(Partial safety factor for load yf)
yf for DL and LL should be taken as 1.5 for limit state of collapse
and 1.0 for limit state of serviceability.
(ii) The characteristicstrengths of materials may differ from sample to
sample. Accordingly, the design strength is calculated dividing the
characteristic strength further by the partial safety factor for the material (ym).
(Design strength of material, fd) = (Characteristic strength of material, f ) /
(Partial safety factor of the material, ym)
ym for concrete and steel should be taken as 1.5 and 1.15, respectively
l | P a g e R V R K P r a s a d , K D K C o l l e g e of E n g i n e e r i n g , N a g p u r
2. Assumptions:
a) Plane sections normal to the axis remain plane after bending.
b) The maximum strain in concrete at the outermost compression fibre is
taken as 0.0035 inbending.
c) The stress- strain relationshipof concrete may be assumed any shape in
substantial agreement with the results. An acceptable stress - strain curve is
given in Fig. The compressive strength of concrete in the structure shall be
assumed to be 0.67 fck. The partial safety factor ym = 1.5 .
'•k
d) Tensile strength of the concrete is ignored.
e) The stresses in the reinforcement are derived from representative stress-
strain curve for the type of steel used. Typical curves for mild and HYSD
steels are given in Fig. For design purposes the partial safety factor ym, equal
to 1.15 shall be applied.
mm
f) The maximum strain in the tension reinforcement in the section at failure
shall not be less than:-> ( fs/1.15 Es) + 0.002
R
V
R
Kl
P
r
a
s
a
d
Kl
D
Kl
C
E
N
a
g
P
u
r
The stress-strain relations ship in elasto-plastic zone of HYSD bars -> Tabl
O.Sfyd
0.85fyd
0.9fyd
0.95fyd
0.975fyd
fyd
0
0.0001
0.0003
0
.
0
0
0
7
0.001
0.002
fy415
a
288.70
306.74
324.78
342.83
351.85
360.87
c
0
.
0
0
1
4
4
0.00163
0.00192
0.00241
0.00276
0.00380
fySOO
a
347.83
369.57
391.30
413.04
423.91
434.78
e
0.00174
0.00195
0.00226
0.00277
0.00312
0.00417
fee = 1000x0.446 fck [s - 250e2] if e < 0.002
fsc in case of doubly reinforced sections: (Table 2)
Fsc-
fy
415
500
d'/d
0.005
355
424
0.1
353
412
0.15
342
395
0.2
329
370
Working Stress Method
• The Stresses in an element is obtained from the working loads and
compared with permissible stresses.
• The method follows linear stress-strain behaviour of both the materials.
• Modular ratio can be used to determine allowable stresses.
• Material capabilitiesare under estimated to large extent. Factor of safety
are used in working stress method.
• Ultimateload carrying capacity cannot be predicted accurately.
• The main drawback of this method is that it results in an uneconomical
section.
Limit State Method
• The stresses are obtained from design loads and compared with design
strength.
• In this method, it follows linear strain relationshipbut not linear stress
relationship (one of the major difference between the two methods of
design).
• The ultimate stresses of materials itself are used as allowable stresses.
• The material capabilitiesare not under estimated as much as they are in
working stress method. Partial safety factors are used in limit state
method.
2 | P a g e R V R K P r a s a d , K D K C o l l e g e of E n g i n e e r i n g , N a g p u r
3. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
1
12
12
Linearity of
strain
Design
Philosophy
Design approach
Design
constraints
Stress- strain
relationship of
materials
Factor of safety
Major concerns
Stress
Strain
Compatibility
Loads
Economical
Area of section
%
Reinforcement
Tensile strength
of concrete
WSM LSM
Plane sections remains plane after bending
It is based on elastic
theory
It is based on
deterministic approach
Stresses in materials
are permitted to a
certain extent
Stress-strain diagram is
linear and It follows
Hooke's Law.
Factor of safety is used
to arrive at permissible
stresses
It's major concern is
only safety
The stresses are
compared with
permissible stresses
Modular ration can be
used to find stress, m=
280/3acbc
Strength is estimated
underworking
(Service) loads and
compared with
allowable stresses
Conservative
More
less
It is based on Elastic and
plastic theories
It is based on probabilistic
approach
Strain in material is
limited to a certain extent.
Stress-strain diagram is
non- linear. Reserve
strength is also considerd
Partial safety factor for
loads and materials are
used
Major concernis safetyas
well asserviceability
The stresses are
compared with design
stresses
Modular ratio is used only
for strain compatibility,
m= Es/Ec
Strength is estimated
under factored (ultimate)
loads and compared with
characteristic stresses
Economical
less
more
Tensile strength of concrete is ignored; Section is
analysed on cracked section basis
R
V
R
K
P
r
a
s
a
d
K
D
K
C
E
N
a
g
P
u
r
a) Depth of Limiting NA, xu,lim
From strain diagram
xu.lim 0.0035
0.0035+- -+0.002
i.iSEs
For fy 250,xulim/d =0.53
For fy 415, xulim/d =0.48
For fy 500,xu lim/d =0.46
b) Depth of NA, xu
Area of stress block =
= 0.446 fckx (3xu/7)
+(2/3)0.446fckx(4xu/7)
= 0.19114+0.1699
= 0.362 fck xu
O_ ,
•c
'
d
'
c/
O
5 0.446 fck
20 -*4 C
fy/1.15E+0.002
>T
Comp force, C = area of stress block x b
From equilibrium : C=T -> :. (0.362 fckxu)b = Ast x 0.87 ry
Ast X 0.87 fy
[fy/U5 = 0.87fy] [Ga]
n xu
Hence, — =
d 0.36 x/cfc xb xd
c) Lever arm: Taking moments from the top of stress block (diagram)
0.19114(3/14) + 0.1699[3/7 + (3/8)4/7]
V = XU =
y 0.19114 + 0.1699
Lever armjd = d- 0.416xu
d) Moment of resistance: asC = T
MR; Mu = Cxjd = [0.362fckxu b ] x [d- 0.42 xu]
OR
MR, Mu = T xjd = [Ast x 0.87fy] x [d - 0.42 xu ]
Mu = Ast X0.87 fy Xd (l - 0.42
* Astx0.87/y xd (l - ***x fy
' J d
Mu i Ast x
0.87/yd = ^St
The under reinforced solution,
----- [Gb]
fy x b x d>
4.6 Mu
bd
fckbcl2
e) Percentage of steel for section with limiting (balanced section) case
as C = T; [0.362 fck xu b ] = [Ast x 0.87fy]
Ast 0.36 fck xu
3 | P a g e R V R K P r a s a d , K D K C o l l e g e of E n g i n e e r i n g , N a g p u r
4. 0,0035 .
3xu/7
xu ( .
I 4xu/7
0X532 + 0.87 f<
/ "
007
d
l r
^ do
StrainDiagram
Design constants for section with limiting NA
Q.4467fck
rf^
, 6 XL
-^?r-J-A
Cy
Id
.!_, »
Stress Diaeram
a) Depth of limitingNA, xu lim /d = 0.0035 / (0.0055+0.87 fy/ E)
b) Area of stress block = (17/21 bh) = 0.362 fck xu = 0.36 fck xu
c) Distance of resultant comp. from extreme comp. fibre =
9(3) + 8(6 + 3) /xux
y 1 1 fMlfi vii
17 VlJ °'41
d) Lever arm, jd = d-0.416 xu lim =d [ 1- 0.42 xu lim/d]
e) MR, Mu = (0.36 fck xu) b x d (1-0.42 xu lim/d) =
= 0.36 (xu lim/d)( 1-0.42 xu lim/d) fck x bd2 = Qbd2 —[Gc]
f) Percentage of steel, p = 100 x (0.36 fck/0.87fy) x (xu/d)
Mild/pla
in
Fe250
xu lim/d = xu max / d 0.5314
IfQ=qxfck; q 0.1496
MR Coeff, Q
% Steel, p
2.9933
1.77%
MR Coeff, Q
% Steel, p
3.7416
2.21%
Mild Tensi
steel
M20
M25
M30
MR Coeff, Q
% Steel, p
4.4899
2.65%
e HYSD/CTI
TOR Fe 41
0.4792
0.138
2.7745
0.96%
3.4682
1.2%
4.1618
1.44%
) HYSD500
5 Fe 500
0.4561
7 0.1336
2.6726
0.76%
3.3407
0.95%
4.0089 •
1.14%
R
V
R
K
P
r
a
s
a
d
K
D
K
C
E
N
a
g
P
u
r
Question 1: Derive the Design coefficients(for NA, lever arm, MR and
percent steel) for a rectangular section with M25 and Fe 415.
Solutjpni
xu.lim 0.0035
a) Coefficient for depth of Limiting NA, k;
0.0035+ fy
1.1 sEs
= 0.48
+0.002
b) The resultant compressive force passes through the CG of Stress block @
0.42 xu from the extreme compression fibre
The lever armcoefficient,j = 1- 0.42 (xumax/d) = 1 - 0.42 x 0.48 = 0.798
c) Coefficient for ultimate Moment of resistance, Q = k xj x 0.36 fck
= 0.48(U042x0.48)x0.36 fck = 0.138 fck = 3.45
d) Coefficient for percentage of steel = percentage of steel, p
41.4(fck/fy)(xu max/d) = 41.4(25/415)(0.48) = 1.197%
Question 2: A RCC beam 230mmx 500mm is reinforced with 3 x 16mm dia
bars. Find moment of resist ance if the effective cover is 40mm.Assuming
M20 concrete & Fe415
Solution:
a) Depth of Limiting NA, xu max = 0.48 d = 0.48x460 = 220.8mm
b) Depth of NA, xu; from C = T -» 0.36 fck xu x b = (Ast) (0.87fy)
xu 0.87x/yx^st 0.87X415X603 _ ~o r o
— = = = U.toiJO
d 0.36x/ckxbXd 0.36X20x230X460
xu = 131.47 mm [it is not Over Reinforced]
c) MR, Mu = C x jd = (0.36 fck xu) b( d - 0.42 xu)
= 0.36 x20x!31.47x230[ 460 - 0.42 x!31.47 ] =88.13xl06Nmm=88.13 kNm
OR -»MR, Mu= T xjd = Ast x 0.87fy ( d - 0.42xu)
= 603 x 0.87 x 415 [460-0.42 xl31.47] = 88.13xl06Nmm =88.13 kNm
Question 3: Determinethe service load (udl) which can be carried by a
simply supported beam of 5m span having cross section 230 x 450
mm(effective), the beam is reinforced with 3 x 20 mm ty placed at an effective
cover of 50 mm. M20 and Fe 500.
Solution:
a) Depth of Limiting NA, xu max = 0.48 d = 0.48x450 = 216 mm
b) Depth of NA, xu =
0.87x/yx,4st 0.87x415x942
= 205.38 mm < xumax
0.36xfckxft 0.36x20x230
c) MR, Mu = T x jd = Ast x 0.87fy ( d - 0.42xu)
= 942x0.87x415 [450-0.42x205.38]= 123.71kNm
d) We know that, BM = MR; ^^ = 123.71
8
.-. Ultimate (factored)load, wu = 39.587 kN/tn
4 | P a g e R V R K P r a s a d , K D K C o l l e g e of E n g i n e e r i n g , N a g p u r
5. Service (working) load, w = wu/1.5 = 39.587/1.5 =26.39 kN /m
e) Superimposed Service load (Service load it can carry):
Self weight of beam/m = (1 x 0.23x 0.5)25 = 2.89kN/m
Hence it can carry, 26.39 -2.89= 23.5 kN/m
Question 4:Find the area of reinforcement required in a rectangular beam of
230 x 500, if it has to resist an ultimate moment of 125kNm. Use M 20 and
Fe4I5
Solution:
Effective cover = Nominal cover +<J)t + <j>m/2 *
Assume ~»30 + 8 + 20/2 = 48 [moderate exposure]
Effective depth = 500 - 48= 452 mm
[Gb] -> Mu = Ast x 0.87fy x d (
125x 106 = Ast x 0.87x 415 x 4521
fck xb xd,
Ast X 415
20 X230 X452,
1.99596 x 10~*Ast2 - Ast +765.9567 = 0 -> Ast=943.72 mm2
OR
Ast =
fck
- 1- 4.6 Mu
fck b d2
10
4l5
1- 1-
4.6 x 125 x 106
20 X 230 X 4522
bd
= 944mm2
Question 5: A singly reinforced beam of 6 m effective span has to carry a udl
of 24 kN/m (inclusive of self weight) under service conditions. The width of
beam is 250 mm and reinforce on tension side only. Design the smallest
section, calculate the depth of section and reinforcement. Use M20 & Fe 415.
Solution:
a) Factored load, wu = 1.5(DL+LL) = 1.5(24) = 36 kN/m
b) Maximum BM @ mid-span = 36 x 62/8 = 162 kNm
c) Depth of Beam :
'MU
We know that, BM s MR -> Mu = Qbd2; .-. d = [Q=kxjxO,36fck]
Effective depth required, d = f—-—-— = 484.5mm
V 2.76 x 250
Effective cover = 20 + 6 +20/2 = 36mm
Overall depth required = 520.5 = Say 525 mm
Hence provide D = 525 mm & /. Effective depth, d = 525-36 ~ 489 mm
d) Area of steel(reinforcement)
R
V
R
M
P
r
a
s
a
d
Kl
D
K)
C
E
N
a
Ast =
fck
2/y
i- i-
4.6 Mu
fck b d2
4.6 x 162 xlO6
20 x 250 x 4892
bd
= 1137.7 mm2 [0.0096x250x484.5 =1163]
Try 20 mm<J> -» No of bars, n = Ast/ast = 1137.7/314 = 3.62Nos
Provide 4 Nos of 20 mm<j) [Astprovided = 1256]
OR
Try 3 Nos of 20 mm <fr -> remainingsteel = 1137.7 - 942 = 195.7 mm2
No of 12 mm<f> bars required = 195.7/113 = 1.73 say 2 Nos
.'.Area of steel = 3 x 20<J. + 2 x 12<j> [Ast provided^1168]
Question 6: Determine Moment of Resistances of a rectangular section
reinforced with a steel of area 2600mm2 on the tension side. The width of the
beam is 300mm, effective depth 600mm. The grade of concrete is M20 &
Fe250 grade steel is used
Solution:
a) Depth of Limiting NA, xu max = 0.53 d = 0.53x600 = 318mm
b) Depth of NA, xu =
Q.87xfyXA$t 0.87X250X2600
= 261.8 mm <xumax
Q.36Xfckxb 0.36x20x300
c) MR,Mu= T xjd = Ast * 0.87fy ( d- 0.42xu)
= 2600 x 0.87x 250 [ 600 - 0.42 x261.8] = 277.12kNm
[ OR0.36x 20 x 261.8 x 300 ( 600 - 0.42x261.8 ) = 277.11 kNm ]
Question 7: A singly reinforced beam 300mmx600mm is reinforced with 4
bars of 20mm dia with an effective cover of 50mm. effective span is 4m.
Assuming M20 concrete & Fe415 steel, find the value of central load P that
can be carried by the beam
Solution:
a) Depth of Limiting NA, xu max = 0.48 d = 0.48x550 = 264 mm
u f x t A 0.87xfyxAst 0.87x415x1256
b) Depth ofNA, xu = Q36x/cfex, = 0.36X2QX300 = 209.9mm <xu max
c) MR, Mu = T xjd = Ast x 0.87fy ( d - 0.42xu)
= 1256 x 0.87x 415 [ 550 - 0.42 x209.9 ] = 209.44 kNm
[ OR 0.36x 20 x 209.9 x 300( 550- 0.42 x209.9 ) ]
d) We know that, BM = MR;
Self weight = (1 x 0.3x0.6) 25= 4.5 kN/m
/Wl w!2W 4.5x425 _ + — = 209.44 -> 1.5 —- + n
V 4 8 / V 4 8 J
.'. The valueof central load P that can be carried by the beam, W = 130.6 kN
5 | P a g e R V R K P r a s a d , K D K C o l l e g e of E n g i n e e r i n g , N a g p u r
6. Doubly reinforced sections:
Doubly reinforced sections are preferred, when the section dimensions are/is
limited (restricted), Or incase of restrained beams where both Sagging and
hogging moments occur in the beam
a) Depth of Limiting NA, xu,lim
From strain diagram
xu.lim 0.0035
0.0035+- fy -+0.002
l.lSEs
For fy 250, xulim/d = 0.53
For fy 415, xulim/d = 0.48
For fy 500, xu lim/d = 0.46
b) Depth of NA, xu
C ^ T
Cc + Cs =T
Cc = 0.36 fck xu b
Cs = Asc x (fsc-fcc)
T =Astx0.87fy
o fy/1.15E+0.002
0.446 fck
dc
fcc =0.446 fck, if ESC > 0.002
else fcc = 1000x0.446 fck [e - 250e2]
Note: fsc is always less than 0.87 fy in case of HYSD bars
It can be either found from strain diagram or the table 2
[ Initially fcc may be approximated to 0.446 fck
& fsc may be approximated to 0.87 fy ]
From equilibrium: C = T -» Cc + Cs = T
.-. (0.36 fck xu)b+Asc (fsc-fcc) = Ast x 0.87 fy d
.. xu Ast x 0.87 fy -Asc (fsc-fcc}
Hence, — = — —-—-
d 0.36 x/cfe xbxd
c) Lever arms: forCc ;jd 1= d - 0.42 xu
&forCs;jd2 = d-d?
If MR, Mu is to determined on the basis of Tension, jd = d- y
.... - Cc(0.42xu)+Cs(d')
Where, y = — —
J Cc+Cs
d) Moment of resistance: asC = T
MR; Mu = I (Cx jd ) = Cc xjdl + Cs x jd2
= [0.362 fck xu h ] [d - 0.42 xu] + [Asc(fsc-fcc)][d-d']
OR _
MR, Mu = T xjd - [Ast x 0.87 fy] x [d - y]
_Cs_
d -0.42xu
d - y
R
V
R
K
P
r
a
s
a
d
Kl
D
Kl
C
E
N
a
g
P
u
r
Question 8: A rectangular beam 250 x 550 mm in M20 grade concrete is
provided with Fe 415 type reinforcement of 3 - 20 mm§ + 2-16 mm<}) on
tension side with an effective cover of 46 mm and 2 - 1 2 mm o on
compression side with an effective cover of 42 mm. Calculate the ultimate
moment capacity of the section.
Solution:
1. Depth of limiting NA, xu max = 0.48 d = 0.48x(550-46)=241.92 mm
2. Depth of NA, xu
Ast = 3x 314 +2x201 = 1344 mm2; Asc = 2x113 = 226 mm2.
As C=T -> Cc+Cs =T -> (b xu) 0.36 fck + Asc( fsc-fcc) = (Ast) ( 0.87fy);
Ast X O.o/ x fy —Asc(jsc — fcc)
u~
X~
0.36
Assuming fsc = 0.87 fy and fcc = 0.446 fck
1344 x 0.87 x 415 - 226(0.87 x 415 - 0.446x20)
MR
< 241.92
u 0.36x250x20
=225.372 mm
, Mu = I Cxjd = Cc x jdl + Cs x jd2
= 0.36 fck xu b [d-0.42 xu] + Asc( fsc-fcc) [d-d']
= 0.36 x 20 x 225.37 x 250 x (504-0.42x225.37)
+ 226 (0.87 x 415 - 0.446 x 20) x (504 - 42)
= 405666(504-0.42x225.37+79581.38 )x(504-42) = 202.824 kNm
OR
Ast x 0.87 x /y[0.42 xu] +Asc(fsc - fcc}[d]
y = -
x,, =
Ast x 0.87 x fy +Asc(fsc - /cc)
405666(0.42 x 225.37) + 79581.38 x 42
= 86.0198
405666 + 2958138
Mu = T xjd = [Ast x 0.87 fy] x [d - y] = 1344 x 0.87x 415[504-86.0198]
= 202.825 kNm
Question 9: Calculate the moment of resistance of a doubly reinforced RC
beam of rectangular section of size 300 x 500 mm reinforced with 4 - 25$
bars on tension side and 3 - 16$ bars on compression side. Use M20 and Fe
250. Assume an effective cover of 45 mm on both sides.
Solution:
1. Depth of limiting NA, max = 0.53 d = 0.53x(500-45}=241.2 mm
2. Depth of NA, xu
6 | P a g e R V R K P r a s a d , K D K C o l l e g e of E n g i n e e r i n g , N a g p u r
7. Cc+Cs =T -> (b xu) 0.36 fck + Asc( fsc-fcc) = (Ast) ( 0.87fy);
_ Ast X 0.87 x fy - Asc(fsc - fcc}
*u~ 0.36 xbxfck
Assuming fsc = 0.87 fy and fee = 0.446 fck
x,, =
4x491 x 0.87x 250 - 3x201 (0.87 x 250 - 0.446x20)
0.36 x 300 x 20
= 139.54 mm < 241,2
MR Mu = £ Cxjd = Cc x jdl + Cs x jd2
= 0.36 fck xu b [d-0.42 xu] + Asc( fsc-fcc) [d-d']
= 0.36 x 20 x 139.54 x 300 x (455-0.42x139.54)
+ 603 (0.87 x 250 - 0.446 x 20) x (455 - 45) = 171.04 kNm
Design of Doubly reinforced beam
A doubly reinforced beam is designed as Singly reinforced balanced section
PLUS Compression steel and additional tensile reinforcement to resist the
remaining moment.
Question 10 : A doubly reinforced beam of size 250 x 600 mm depth is
required to resist an ultimate moment of 310 kNm.Using M20 and mild steel
reinforcement, calculate the amount of steel required. The effective covers are
55 mm and 40 mm on tension and compression side respectively
Solution:
a) Ultimate moment of resistance of Singly reinforced balanced section =
Qbd2 = 2.76 x 250 x 5452 = 204.95 kNM
b) Area of steel required for SR Balanced section, Astl = 0.0096 x250 x545
= 1308mm2.
[OR Ast = l- i- 415 20
2/> fckb
C) Compressionreinforcement:
Balance Moment , Mubal = 310- 204.95 = 105.05kNm
Assuming fsc = 0.87 fy and fee = 0.446 fck
Mu bal = Asc( fsc-fcc) (d-d')
105.05 x 106 = Asc (0.87 x 415 - 0.446 x 20)(545 - 40) ; Asc = 590.75mm2
Try 20 mmfc No of bars = 590/201 = 2.9 say 3Nos
d) Additional tensile reinforcement
Mu bal= Ast2 x 0.87 fy (d-d') ,
105.05 x 106 = Ast2 (0.87 x 4 15)(545-40) ; Ast2 =576 mm2
e) Total tensile reinforcement
Ast = Astl + Ast2 = 1308 + 576 = 1884 mm2
R
V
R
M
P
r
a
s
a
d
Kl
D
Kl
C
E
N
a
g
P
u
r
Try 25 mnn|) ; n= Ast/ast =1884/491 =3.83 say4Nos.
Question 11 :A doubly reinforced beam 230 x 500 mm size requiredto resist
an ultimate moment of 170 kNm and ultimate shear force of 80 kN. Using
M20 and Fe 415 steel, calculate the quantity of steel required and shear
reinforcement. The effective cover to tension steel is 50mm and compression
steel is 45 mm.
Solution:
a) Ultimate momentof resistance of Singly reinforced balanced section =
Qbd2 = 2.76 x 230 x 4502 = 128.55 kNM
b) Area of steel required for SR Balanced section, Astl = 0.0096 x230 x450
= 993.6 mm2.
[OR Ast = l- i- 415 20
c) Compression reinforcement:
Balance Moment , Mubal = 170 - 128.55 = 41.45 kNm
Assuming fsc = 0.87 fy and fee = 0.446 fck
Mu bal = Asc( fsc-fcc) (d-d')
41.45 x 106 = Asc (0.87 x 415-0.446 x 20)(450 -45) ; Asc = 290.65mm2
Try 12 mm<t>; No of bars = 290/113 = 2.6 say 3Nos
d) Additional tensile reinforcement
Mu bal = Ast2 x 0.87 fy (d-d')
41.45 x 106 = Ast2 (0.87 x 415)(450-45) ; Ast2 =283.47 mm2
.'. Total tensile steel, Ast = Astl + Ast2 = 993.6 + 283.47 = 1277 mm2
Try 25 mm$ ; n= Ast/ast =1277 7491 = 2.6 say 3 Nos.
e) Check for shear
Shear stress, tv = V/(bd) =80 x 103/(230 x 450) =0.773 MPa
Percentage of tensile steelt, p = 100 Ast/bd = 100xl277/(230x450) = 1.23%
Permissible shear stress, TC (Table 1 9- IS 456)
1% - - - 0.62
1.25--- 0.67
1.23 -» 0.62 + (0.05/0.25)(0.23) = 0.666 Mpa
iv> t c - Unsafe; Hence provide shear reinforcement
f) Design of shear reinforcement:
Design shear force, Vus = V - TC bd = 80x103 -0.666x230x450 =llxl03
Try 2 legged Vertical slirrups of 6 mm <jt , Asv = 2 x 28.3 = 58.6 mm2
4sv(0.87/»d 58.6(0.87 x 415)450
sv = -- -- = --—r-=- = 865 mmclc
Vus 11 x 103
Max permissiblespacing (smallerof the three)
7 | P a g e R V R K P r a s a d , K D K C o l l e g e of E n g i n e e r i n g , N a g p u r
8. i) 0.75 d = 0.75(450) = 337.5
ii) 300
....... . . ,- Asv(O.B7fy) 58.6(0.87X415) „„_
in) Minimum shear reinforcement, sv = —•—-*« = = = 229
0.46 0.4X230
/. Maximum permissible spacing is 229 mm c/c
Hence provide 6 mm<j> 2 legged vertical stirrups @ 200 c/c
J <J <J
:LQ c.
Singly reinforced sections
Question 12:Design a RC beam 350x700mm effective section, subjected to a
bending moment of 300kNm. Adopt M20concrete and Fe415 steel. Sketch
reinforcement details
Solution:
a) Design (Factored) Moment, Mu = 1.5 x 300 - 450 kNm
b) MR of a balanced section = Qbd2 = 2.76 x 350 x 7002 = 473kNm
Hence it is singly reinforced and under reinforced section
c) Area of tensile reinforcement
Ast =
fck
2fy
1- 1-
4.6 Mu
bd =
10
415
1-
4.6 x 450 x 106
20 x 350 x 7002
fck b d2
i
= 2186 mm2 [0.0096x350x700 =2352]
Try 25 mm<t>, n = 2186 7491 =4.45; provide 5 - 25$
bd
nooon
R
V
R
Kj
P
r
a
s
a
d
Kl
D
K
C
E
N
a
Question 13: A reinforced concrete beam is supported on two walls 250mm
thick, spaced at a clear distance of 6m. The beam carries a super-imposed load
of 10 KN/m. Design the beam using M20 concrete and HYSD bars of Fe 415
grade.
Solution :
1. Assumption of dimensions: d *l/20k = 60007(0.75x20) = 400
Effective cover = 30 + 8 + 2072 = 48 mm -> say 50 mm
D = 450 mm, b » 0.5D =225 -» say 230mm
2. Effective span [22.2]
c7c of supports = 6+0.25 = 6.25m
Clear span + d = Lc + d = 6 + 0.4 = 6.4 m (Smaller)
Effective span = 6.25m
3. Loading: P""-^.
Selfwt = (lx0.23x0.45)25=2.5875kN7m ^^J
Superimposed load = 10 kN7m
Total, w= 12.5875 kN7m
Design load, wu = 1.5 x 12.5875 = 18.88 kN7m
4. Calculation of BM & SF
Max BM , Mu = wu x 1278 = 18.88x 6.25278= 92.19 kNm
Max SF, Vu = wu x 17 2 = 18.88 x 6.257 2 = 59 kN
5. Computation of effective depth, d =V(M7Qb) =V(92.19x10672.78x230)
= 379 mm < 400 mm Safe
[MR = C x jd = 0.36 fck b xc x (d-0.42 xc) = 0.138 fck bd2]
c • c Q.Sfck [, l^~ 4.6 Mu
6. Area of reinforcement, Ast = —7— 1- I I — - r
fy L fckbd2
10
415
1- 1-
4.6^92.19xl06
20 X 230 x 4002
230x400 = 774mm2
Try 16 mm $, No of bars = 7747201 = 4 bars
7. ShearReinforcement
Shear stress, TV= Vu7bd = 59,0007(230x400) = 0.64 N7mm2
Percentage of steel, p = 100 AsLOxi = 100x774 7(230x400)= 0.84%
0.75%-0.56
1.00%-0.62
TC = 0.84% - 0.56 +(0.0670.25)x0.09 =0.58 N7mm2.
TV > TC - unsafe - provide shear reinforcement
8 | P a g e R V R K P r a s a d , K D K C o l l e g e of E n g i n e e r i n g , N a g p u r
9. Design shear force, Vus = V - TC bd = 59,000 - 0.58(230x400) =
5640 N
Spacing of 6mm <f>, 2 legged vertical stirrups, sv = 0.87fy Asv d/Vus
= 0.87 x415 x (2 x28.27) x400/ 5640 = 1447 mm c/c
Maximum spacing [26.5.1.5]
(i) 0.75 d = 0.75(400) = 300
(ii) 300
(iii) Min. shear reinforcement 0.87fy Asv /0.4b
= 0.87x415x(2x28.27) /0.4x230 = 221
Provide 6 mm(|> 2 legged Vertical stirrups @ 200 mm c/c
Provide 2 nos of 6 mm <|> anchor bars to hold the stirrups
CHECK for 8
8. Check for bond
Development length, Id = <t>(0.87fy)/4Tbd = <t>(0.87x415)/(4xl.6xl.2)
= 47<[> = 47x16 = 752 mm
Ld/3 = 752/3 = 250 mm
Extend the 250 mm in side the support [26.2.3.3 a]
Ld<Ml/V +LO
[ The value of Ml/V in the above expression may be increased by 30% when
the ends of the reinforcementare confined by a compressive reaction]
Bent up 2 bars @ 0.15 1from support
Only 2 bars are available at support, Ml * M/2 =92.19/2 = 46.2 kNm
LO = 12$ or d (greater) 12<f> = 192 or 400 ; LO= 400
Ml/V + LO = 46.2x106/59xl03 + 400=1183 »752 Safe
9. Reinforcement Detailing
poor
R
V
R
K
P
r
a
s
a
d
Kl
D
K!
C
E
N
a
g
P
u
r
9 | P a g e R V R K P r a s a d , K D K C o l l e g e of E n g i n e e r i n g , N a g p u r
10. Winter 14
Q(5a)[ 14M]:
Q(5b)[ 14M]:
Q(6a)[ 14M]:
Q(6b)[ 14M] :
OR
Summer 15
Q (5a) [ 5M ]: Compare WSM and LSM
Q (5b) [ 9M ] : Derive Equation for limiting depth of neutral axis. Also sketch
the stress-strain diagram for beam in flexure. [ OR ]
Q (6a) [ 7M ]: Determine the service load which can be carried by a simply
supported beam of 5m span having cross section 230 x 450 mm effective, the
beam is reinforced with 3x16 mm § placed at an effective cover of 40 mm.
M20 and Fe 500.
Q (6b) [ 7M ]: Design a singly R/F rectangular beam for a clear span of 5 m
subjected to superimposed load of 12kN/m over the entire span. Use M20
and Fe415.
Winter 15
Q (5a) [ 6M ] : A RCC beam 230mmx 500mm is reinforced with 3 x 16mm
dia bars. Find moment of resistance if the effective cover is 40mm. Assuming
M20 concrete & Fe415
Q (5b) [ 7M ]: A singly reinforced beam of 4.5m span carries a udl of 30
kN/m inclusive of self weight. The width of beam is 230 mm and reinforce on
tension side only. Design the smallest section, calculate the depth of section
and reinforcement.Use M20 and Fe 415.
OR
Q (6a) [ 6M ]: Calculate the moment of resistance of a doubly reinforced RC
beam of rectangular section of size 300 x 450 mm reinforced with 6 - 20(|>
bars on tension side and 4 - 20<J> bars on compression side. Use M20 and Fe
250. Assume an effective cover of 35 mm on both sides.
Q (6b) [ 7M ]: A doubly reinforced beam of size 250 x 600 mm depth is
required to resist an ultimate moment of 310 kNm.Using M20 and mild steel
reinforcement, calculate the amount of steel required. The effective covers are
55 mm and 40 mm on tension and compression siderespectively
Summer 16
0 (5a) [ 6M ] : Explain : ^
i) Stress strain relationship for concrete,
ii) Stress strain relationship for steel in LSM.
R
V
R
K
P
r
a
s
a
d
D
M
C
E
N
a
g
P
u
r
Q (5b) [ 7M ] : A rectangular beam is 20cm wide and 40cm deep up to the
centre of reinforcement. Find the area of reinforcement require if it has to
resist a moment of 25 kN/m. Use M 20 concrete mix and Fe 415 steel. Also
give check for sectors
Q (6a) [ 6M ]: Derive Equation for limiting Moment of resistances for
balanced, underreinforced and over reinforced section by LSM of singly
reinforced beam
Q (6b) [ 7M ]: A rectangular beam has a width of 250 mm and effective
depth of 500 mm. The beam is provided with tension steel of 5 -25 mm<t> and
compression steel of 2 - 25 mm <f>. The effective cover to the compression
steel being 50 mm. Calculate the ultimate moment capacity of the section of
fck = 20 MPa and fy = 250 MPa.
Winter 16
Q (5a) [ 7M ] : Design a RC beam 350- 700mm effective section, subjected
to a bending moment of 300kNm. Adopt M20concrete and Fe415 steel.
Sketch reinforcementdetails
Q (5b) [ 6M ] : Determine Moment of Resistances of a rectangular section
reinforced with a steel of area 2000mm2 on the tension side. The width of the
beam is 200mm, effective depth 600mm. The grade of concrete is M20 &
Fe250 grade steel is used
OR
Q (6a) [ 7M ] : A singly reinforced beam 230mm • 600mm is reinforced with
4 bars of 16mm dia with an effective cover of 50mm. effective span is 4m.
Assuming M20 concrete & Fe415 steel, find the value of central load P that
can be carried by the beam
Q (6b) [ 6M ]: Derive Equation for limiting depth of neutral axis and moment
of resistances for balanced, under reinforced and over reinforced section by
using LSM
Summer 17
Q (5) [ 13M ]: Design a singly reinforced rectangularbeam for an effective
span of 5m subjected to a live load of 12 kN/m over the entire span. Calculate
main reinforcement and shear reinforcement. Give all necessary checks as per
IS 456. Draw the sketch of reinforcement details.
OR
Q (6) f 13M ] : A doubly reinforced beam 250 x 600 mm size required to
resist an ultimate moment of 310 kNm and ultimate shear force of 70 kN.
Using M20 and I'c 415 steel, calculate the quantity of steel required and shear
1 0 | P a g e R V R K P r a s a d , K D K C o l l e g e of E n g i n e e r i n g , N a g p u r
11. reinforcement. The effective cover to tension steel is 55mm andcompression
steel is 40 mm.
JLV.k.1 1J -TV/ 1H111.
Recap from Structural Analysis
Support Reactions, SFD. BMD. 6, 8 & FEM
I ) Cantilever beam with concentrated load at free end
A
•
^- v
2) Cantilever beam with udl overthe entire span
. '' * . ' • • • ' ^ " '
* •*
3) SS Beam with concentrated load at mid-span
W
A | B
t
*- _ |_ — — — — -*
N/2 W/2|
W/2 +
W/2
SFD
D
K
V
R
K
P
r
a
s
a
d
K
D
K
C
E
N
a
g
n
F
u
r
^^^-""<^r~
^^^^"^ " ^*^"wi^-^
BMD
:
t^^~^ -" t
Elastic Curve
GA = - GB = WL2/8EI
8c =WL3/48EI .
" FEM =WL/8
4) SS Beam with concentrated load at ccL from A
5) SS Beam with udl over the entire span
• ~n
4
?•<
*
*
•
l l | P a g e R V R K P r a s a d , K D K C o l l e g e of E n g i n e e r i n g , N a g p u r
12. aaaaaaaa
reinforced R.C. beam of Rectangular section of size 300 x 450 mm.
reinforced with 6-20 mm dia bars on tension side and 4-20 mmdia
bars on compression side.
Use M20 grade concrete and Fe 250 grade steel.
Assume eff. cover of 35 mm on both sides. (Use L. S.M.)
Q (6b) [ 7M]: A doubly reinforced beam of size 250mmx600mm
deep is required to resist on ultimate moment of 310 kNm. Using
concrete M 20 and mild steel reinforcement, Calculate the amount of
steel required. The effective cover to tension steel is 55mm whilethat
for compression steel is 40mm. (Use L.S. M.)
TABU A SAUCNT POINTS OH THE DC6KJN 6THC56 STRAIN OJHVC fOU
CnitVWORKED BARS
( fftiw I i S ;: i.
/, - MO N,'mm«
II)
«»/H
CHJ/H
VW/ni
at!/*
0 «T1 /,«
10/H
' Stnun
Ci
0-00144
OO31H
<KOI«
0OIK 41
now 7*
0«)»
Strut
01
0*1
)OS7
W4-I
M7I
!l 1
]60«
'smin
(4>
O001 74
00014)
(KXUM
OflCCTT
0001 11
MM I
I
Sttw
(i)
M? I
VWd
)9C)
4110
4M-*
4U|
SJTT .. 1 irtrlr iM«f«UliM MJty M 04M l« iftlffflVOitlt HWtL
Winter 15
Q (5a) [ 6M ]: A RCC Beam 230 X500 mm is reinforced with
3-16mm dia bars. Find the moment of Resistance, if effective cover is
40 mm and effective span 3 m. Use M 20 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
(Use L.S.M.)
0 (5b) [ 7M ]: A simply supported beam of 4.5 m span carries
a udL of 30 kN/m inclusiveof self wt. The width of beam is 230 mm
and is reinforced on tension side only. Design the smallest section,
calculate depth of section and reinforcement. Use M20 concrete and (
Fe250 steel. (Use L. S. M.)
Q (6a) [ 6M ] : Calculate the moment of resistance of a doubly
TABLE E MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE c*
TENSILE REINFORCEMENT ft^ FOR
SINGLY RHWOROU1 RKTAWOUl-AR
15
j*
M
2)0
1-13
1'TC
2")0
1-44
411
»n
ii»
r4j
wo
0-J7
0-M
OM
I I )
C LIMITING MOMLNI OF
RF5ISTASCE AND RUM ORCIMI.ST
K)R ilNGLV
tilmaf
(ClMf JJ)
014*
:I*T
ulM 01)1
12 [ P a g e R V R K P r a s a d , K D K C o l l e g e of E n g i n e e r i n g , N a g p u r
13. TABLE D LIMITING MOMtNT OF
R1SISTASO- rA4.TUR W,^_/W. S mm* TOR
SINGLY REINFORCFO RICIANCULAR
SECTIONS
A*.
II
jj
»
' 1)0
I 14
1-M
1TJ
4-47
£. N/rnm'
41}
107
216
1-4J
414
MO
JflO
I'M
J.j)
39»
TABLE F STRESS IN COMfUFSSKJN
RtlSfORCSMtNT/U, H'nxo* IN DOUBLV
-- - - MAM WITH rrwn.
WORKeO BARS
(f/«.i* ;j «
N/«>
41)
OOJ
JJ5
<HO
]»
411
en
J4J
m
Summer 15
( la)[7]Discuss the merits and demerits of Working Stress method
(Ib) [6] Derive design constants for neutral axis, lever arm, constant for
moment of Resistance and constant for percentage of steel in WSM
OR
(2a)[6]Explain under reinforce, over reinforced and balanced section in WSM
(2b)[7] A singly reinforced concrete beam is of width 400 mm and effective
depth 615 mm. It is reinforced with 8-20<J> mild steel bars. Assume M25 grade
concrete, determine its moment of resistance according to WSM.
(3a)[6] Explain the advantages of pre-stressed concrete over RCC
(3b)[7])Explain with the help of neat sketches any two of the followingpre-
stressing systems
(i) Freyssinet system
(ii) Magnel-Blaton system
(iii)Gifford Udall system
OR
(4X13]Explain
(i) Different types of losses in pre-stressed concrete beam
(ii) Pre tensioning and post tensioning
(iii) Application of Pre-stressed concrete.
(5a)[5] Compare WSM and LSM
[5b)[9]Derive equations for limiting depth of neutral axis. Also sketch the
stress and strain diagram for beam in flexure
Or
(6a)[7]Determine the service load which can be carried by Simply supported
beam of 5.0m span having 230 x 450 (eff), the beam is reinforced with 3-16<J>.
Eff cover is 40 mm. M20 and Fe 500 are used.
(6b)[7] Design a Singly reinforced rectangular beam for a clear span of 5.0m
subjected to a superimposed load of 12 kN/m over the entire span. Use M20
and Fe415
(7a)[6]Determine the MR of a T-beam from the following details
bf = 1000mm, Df = 120 mm, Ast = 6 -25<J> , d = 600 ,„ bw = 300 mm, M20
and Fe415
..
(7b)[7] Design a RCC Column of Rectangular section having unsupported
length of 3m subjected to an axial compressive laod of 1200kN using M20
and Fe415. One dimension is restricted to 400 mm.
OR
(8)[13] Design a rectangular pad footing for a column of size 300 x 500 mm
with compressive load of 1000 kN. Use M20 concrete with Fe 415 steel, the
density of soil is 21kN/m3 and SBC 150 kN/m2. Give all the necessary
checks as per IS 456 with neat sketch.
(9a)[7] What is limit state of serviceability? How it is ensured for beams?
(9b)[6]ExpIain in brief the various measures for deflection control as per IS
456-2000
OR
(10)[13]Design a rectangular beam section of size 250 x 450 mm subjecred to
a bending moment of 30 kNm, Shear force of 40 kN and torsional moment of
20 kNm at working condition. Use M20 And Fe 41 5.
(1 1)[14] Design a cantilever slab projecting 1.5 m from rhe face of column,
the slab carries live load of 1.5 kN/m2. Use M20 andf Fe 415. Sketch
reinforcement details.
OR
(12)[14]Design a slab panel for a hall of size 4 * 5.5msupported on 230 mm
thick brick wall all around, the slab carries superimposed load of 2.5 kN/m2
with floor finish of 0.75 kN/m2. Use M20 Grade of Concrete and Fe 415 type
13 ( P a g e R V R K P r a s a d , K D K C o l l e g e of E n g i n e e r i n a g p u r