Ratings of Ukrainian Сities: February 2016
•
0 likes•150 views
by the results of the municipal IRI polls in Ukraine
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to Ratings of Ukrainian Сities: February 2016
Similar to Ratings of Ukrainian Сities: February 2016 (19)
More from Rating Pro
More from Rating Pro (11)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (16)
Ratings of Ukrainian Сities: February 2016
- 1. www.ratingpro.org The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of CanadaIRI By results of municipal surveys conducted by Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents) Ratings of Ukrainian Сities - IRI second municipal survey
- 2. Summary rating of oblast centers of Ukraine Index of satisfaction with the quality of public goods and services The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI where 1 is «terrible», 2 – «bad», 3 – «average», 4 – «good», and 5 – «excellent» 2,5 2,6 2,6 2,6 2,7 2,7 2,7 2,7 2,7 2,8 2,9 2,9 2,9 2,9 2,9 3,0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3,1 3,1 3,2 3,2 3,4 Mykolaiv Kherson Odesa Zaporizhia Chernihiv Kirovograd Dnipropetrovsk Sumy Uzhgorod Chernivtsiі Kyiv Zhytomyr Sievierodonetsk Ivano-Frankivsk Poltava Cherkasy Mariupol Rivne Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Lutsk Lviv Kharkiv Vinnytsa Dynamics of changes in the Index (2015-2016) of satisfaction with the quality of public goods and services Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi were not surveyed in 2015 Situation has worsened Situation has not changed Situation has improved www.ratingpro.org
- 3. Sense of pride for the city Vinnitsa 2,7 Lviv Chernivtsi Odesa Ivano-Frankivsk Kharkiv 2,6 Ternopil Mykolaiv Sievierodonetsk Uzhgorod 2,5 Chernihiv Kyiv Dnipropetrovsk 2,4 Rivne Zaporizhia Lutsk Poltava 2,3 Sumy Cherkasy 2,2 Kherson Khmelnytskyi 2,1 Zhytomyr Kirovograd 2,0 Mariupol Index of the sense of pride for the city where «definitely proud of their city» – 3, «somewhat proud» – 2, «not very proud» – 1, «definitely not proud» – 0 The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI www.ratingpro.org
- 4. The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. Rating of oblast centers of Ukraine by areas IRI Vinnytsa Kharkiv Lviv Lutsk Khmelnytskyi Ternopil Poltava Rivne Cherkasy Ivano-Frankivsk Zhytomyr Mariupol Sievierodonetsk Chernivtsi Kyiv Uzhgorod Sumy Chernihiv Dnipropetrovsk Kirovograd Kherson Odesa Zaporizhia Mykolaiv Index of satisfaction with the quality of public goods and services where 1 is «terrible», 2 – «bad», 3 – «average», 4 – «good», and 5 – «excellent» 2,0 2,2 2,4 2,6 2,8 3,0 3,2 3,4 3,6 3,8 www.ratingpro.org Ecology Humanitarian area Medical institutions Communal area Infrastructure
- 5. Level of satisfaction with the quality of 3,2 3,0 2,8 2,6 2,4 2,2 Street markets and trade premises Water supply Schools Universities, technical institutes, colleges Heating Garbage collection Culture premises Public parks and gardens Kindergartens Sport facilities Sewage Street lighting Transport infrustructurePolice (militia) Sidewalks Ecology Yards and areas near buildings Medical institutions Parking Accessibility for people with disabilities Roads Industrial zones / Industrial development The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI www.ratingpro.org Index of satisfaction with the quality of public goods and services where 1 is «terrible», 2 – «bad», 3 – «average», 4 – «good», and 5 – «excellent» Aggregate result for all the cities public goods and services in the cities
- 6. Index of satisfaction with the quality of public goods and services Survey was not conducted where 1 is «terrible», 2 – «bad», 3 – «average», 4 – «good», and 5 – «excellent» 50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 20-29%60-69% 10-19% consider that things in the city are going in the right direction 50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 20-29%60-69% 10-19% are satisfied with the Mayor, elected during the last elections The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI www.ratingpro.org 3.2-3.3 3.0-3.1 2.8-2.9 2.6-2.73.4 2.5 Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Comparison of the level of satisfaction with the quality of public goods and services with the local elections results
- 7. Comparison of the assessments of situation 32% 23% 16% 15% 11% 8% 5% 0% -10% -16% -19% -21% -28% -32% -33% -36% -39% -42% -42% -43% -46% -46% -59% -61% -39% -39% -56% -57% -52% -42% -61% -64% -55% -50% -32% -30% -54% -41% -48% -48% -47% -61% -60% -48% -63% -61% -65% -62% Balance of the assessments of «right» and «wrong» movement city country The International Republican Institute GovernmentSurvey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI www.ratingpro.org Zhytomyr Ternopil Mykolaiv Kharkiv Mariupol Dnipropetrovsk Sievierodonetsk Rivne Lutsk Chernihiv Vinnytsa Ivano-Frankivsk Cherkasy Kyiv Poltava Lviv Odesa Uzhgorod Kherson Chernivtsi Zaporizhia Kirovograd Khmelnytskyi Sumy in the cities and Ukraine
- 8. Approval level of the institutions activities The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI www.ratingpro.org 68% -64% -63% -61% -46% -42% -31% -28% -24% -17% 3% 4% 8% 10% 11% 24% 27% 37% 42% Government of Ukraine Parliament of Ukraine Courts Prosecutors office Communal enterprises President of Ukraine Oblast state administration Oblast city council Executive committee City council National media City Head Police (Militia) Neighborhood associations (OSBB, OSN) Local media National Guard NGOs Army Church Balance of the assessments «approve» and «disapprove» the activities Aggregate result for all the cities
- 9. Comparison of approval rates of the institutions activities The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI www.ratingpro.org 45% 42% 33% 27% 25% 23% 19% 15% 15% 9% 7% 4% -6% -7% -11% -17% -17% -22% -33% -33% -40% -49% -50% -50% -55% -31% -26% -65% -27% -42% -31% -52% -36% -36% -34% -42% -33% -38% -40% -64% -32% -65% -44% -28% -37% -54% -46% -56% Balance of the assessments «approve» and «disapprove» the activities Mayor President Mykolaiv Ternopil Poltava Khmelnytskyi Odesa Kyiv Rivne Vinnytsa Mariupol Chernihiv Lutsk Lviv Zhytomyr Sumy Sievierodonetsk Kharkiv Cherkasy Zaporizhia Chernivtsi Dnipropetrovsk Uzhgorod Kirovograd Ivano-Frankivsk Kherson
- 10. Comparison of approval rates of the institutions activities The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI www.ratingpro.org 19% 10% 8% 4% 4% 3% 1% -4% -6% -9% -10% -11% -16% -18% -21% -22% -24% -28% -33% -38% -43% -50% -52% -63% -69% -51% -81% -63% -69% -69% -62% -56% -60% -47% -60% -54% -67% -57% -52% -64% -53% -74% -53% -54% -68% -75% -74% -75% Balance of the assessments «approve» and «disapprove» the activities City council Parliament Rivne Mariupol Sievierodonetsk Vinnytsa Khmelnytskyi Chernihiv Zhytomyr Cherkasy Ivano-Frankivsk Mykolaiv Lviv Lutsk Kirovograd Sumy Zaporizhia Kharkiv Dnipropetrovsk Poltava Chernivtsi Odesa Uzhgorod Kherson Ternopil Kyiv
- 11. Satisfaction with the Police institution activities March 2015 February 2016 21% 23% 25% 26% 29% 32% 32% 33% 34% 34% 36% 36% 37% 44% 44% 45% 45% 48% 52% 61% 61% 67% Chernihiv Chernivtsi Zhytomyr Sumy Cherkasy Kherson Kirovograd Rivne Ivano-Frankivsk Zaporizhia Poltava Ternopil Mykolaiv Dnipropetrovsk Odesa Vinnytsa Kharkiv Uzhgorod Khmelnytskyi Lutsk Kyiv Lviv at the time of the survey Patrol police has already operated in the city % of respondents, who approve the activities of Police institution The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI www.ratingpro.org
- 12. Personal security sense in the city % of respondents who feel absolutely or mostly safe walking home alone at night Survey was not conducted March 2015 February 2016 50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 20-29%60-69% The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI www.ratingpro.org (dynamics 2015-2016) Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi
- 13. Personal security sense Portugal Spain France Italy Slovenia Austria Czech Republic Germany Belgium Netherlands Great Britain Ireland Denmark Sweden Finland Estonia Latvia Lithuania Poland Romania Bulgaria Greece Macedonia Montenegro Serbia Croatia Hungary Slovakia Cyprus Iceland Malta Luxembourg Turkey Comparison with European countries EUROBAROMETER, 2014 % of respondents who feel absolutely or mostly safe walking home alone at night Survey was not conducted 50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 20-29%60-69%80-89% 70-79%90-99% The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI all oblast centers of UKRAINE www.ratingpro.org Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi
- 14. The spread of corruption at the local level The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI www.ratingpro.org Іndex of frequency of corruption acts Have had to do a favor, give a gift or pay a bribe to a local official in order to get service or document where 3 is «more than 5 times», 2 – «3-5 times», 1 – «1-2 times», 0 – «never» 0,1 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,3 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,4 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,8 Mykolaiv Mariupol Sievierodonetsk Zhytomyr Lviv Sumy Ivano-Frankivsk Ternopil Kirovograd Chernihiv Lutsk Kherson Khmelnytskyi Zaporizhia Poltava Kharkiv Rivne Dnipropetrovsk Chernivtsi Kyiv Odesa Cherkasy Vinnytsa Uzhgorod Dynamics of changes in Index (2015-2016) of frequency of corruption acts were not surveyed in 2015 Situation has worsened Situation has not changed Situation has improved Changes in corruption perception (2015-2016) were not surveyed in 2015 Decrease Increase of respondents considering such actions as corruption acts Consider such actions (a favor, a gift or a bribe to a local official in order to get service or document) as corruption acts Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi
- 15. Priority areas of economy for the cities Легка промисловість Харчова промисловість ТоргівляLight industry Food industry Trade Легка промисловість Харчова промисловістьConstruction Wood processing Харчова промисловість ТоргівляChemical industry Machine building ТоргівляEnergy The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI * Respondents used to mention this area as priority for the local economy relatively more often www.ratingpro.org Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Легка промисловість Mining and metallurgical sector Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi
- 16. Priority areas of economy for the cities Легка промисловість Харчова промисловість ТоргівляCulture Educational services Scientific research Харчова промисловістьІТ sector Легка промисловість Харчова промисловість ТоргівляFinance and banking Services Tourism The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI * Respondents used to mention this area as priority for the local economy relatively more often www.ratingpro.org Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi
- 17. The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. Rates of the interaction with local authorities IRI 2,0 2,2 2,4 2,6 2,8 3,0 3,2 3,4 Vinnytsa Cherkasy Lutsk Khmelnytskyi Lviv Ternopil Uzhgorod Kharkiv Chernivtsi Sumy Ivano-Frankivsk Mariupol Poltava Zaporizhia Odesa Kyiv Chernihiv Dnipropetrovsk Zhytomyr Rivne Mykolaiv Kirovograd Sievierodonetsk Kherson Manner in which local authorities treated those who have addressed Waiting time (if addressed personally) Quality of service received Level of the local authorities' knowledge on the subject matter Index of satisfaction with the interaction with local authorities where 1 is «terrible», 2 – «bad», 3 – «average», 4 – «good», and 5 – «excellent» among those who have addressed local authorities during the last 2 years www.ratingpro.org
- 18. The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. Assessment of municipal authorities IRI Vinnytsa Lviv Kharkiv Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Lutsk Cherkasy Ivano-Frankivsk Dnipropetrovsk Mariupol Chernivtsi Odesa Rivne Uzhgorod Kyiv Zhytomyr Sumy Poltava Chernihiv Mykolaiv Zaporizhia Kherson Kirovograd Sievierodonetsk Improvement of the city image Improvement of the public safety Securing investments Transparent activity Facilitation of citizens' participation in decision making Responsive attitude to citizens priorities 0,5 0,8 1,1 1,4 1,7 2,0 2,3 Index of assessment of municipal authorities in terms of areas where 3 is «definitely yes», 2 – «somewhat yes», 1 – «somewhat no», 0 – «definitely no» www.ratingpro.org in terms of management areas
- 19. Manner and level of making city related decisions The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI www.ratingpro.org 13% 14% 14% 15% 15% 15% 20% 22% 24% 29% 30% 43% 47% 41% 30% 50% 52% 54% 56% 24% 39% 27% 35% 28% 36% 33% 21% 16% 16% 17% 10% 10% 18% 9% 9% 10% 12% 7% 6% 7% 14% 5% 4% 8% 6% 12% 8% 12% 9% 8% 4% 4% 4% 6% 3% 2% 2% 3% 6% 3% 5% 4% 4% 2% 2% 13% 17% 9% 9% 10% 9% 17% 16% 20% 12% 16% 7% 7% Dismissal of heads of municipal communal enterprises, education and healthcare entities Appointing head of local police Approving general plan of the city Adopting landscaping rules Local taxes and fees Construction of new micro-districts, buildings, establishments Cancelling decisions of the city council Privatization or closure of communal enterprises Appointing local judges Merger with other cities and villages into a combined community Dismissal of head of local police Establishment / dismantlement of monuments Changing topographic names of streets, towns, etc. By decision of Mayor By city council By citizens on local referendum Other / Difficult to answer By decision of President / Governor By decision of Government / Minister Aggregate result for all the cities
- 20. Self-organization of population and its efficiency The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI www.ratingpro.org 8% Aggregate result for all the cities live in the apartment building where a housing association has been established OSBB( ) 77% 12% among them consider that it ... did help to solve problem issues in the building did not help 10% live in the building, quarter, or micro-district where a body of self-organization of population has been established (OSN, housing committee, etc.) 70% 17%among them consider that it ... did help to solve problem issues in the building, quarter, or micro-district did not help 13% volunteer with groups to clean street or park, plant trees, collect garbage, etc. 36% regularly rarely
- 21. Level of public initiative and The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI % of respondents who are ready to join the process on providing proposals for the city council Survey was not conducted 25-30% <25%>30% % of respondents who consider that democratic system of government is more important than prosperous economy Survey was not conducted 25-40% <25%>40% democracy perception www.ratingpro.org Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi
- 22. Comparison of the level of public initiative and The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI % of respondents who are ready to join the process on providing proposals for the city council Чернівці Survey was not conducted 25-30% <25%>30% Index of optimism toward economic situation of Ukraine in the next 12 months Survey was not conducted 2.0-2.2 <2.0>2.4 optimism toward economic situation in the country www.ratingpro.org where 5 is «will improve a lot», 4 – «will improve somewhat», 3 – «will stay the same», 2 – «will worsen somewhat», and 1 – «will worsen a lot» Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi
- 23. European integration attitudes in the cities Support for the economic integration of Ukraine with European Union Support for Ukraine joining NATO Survey was not conducted 80-95% 70-79% 60-69% 50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 25-29% Survey was not conducted 80-90% 70-79% 60-69% 50-59% 40-49% 30-39% 20-29% The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. IRI www.ratingpro.org Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi Kyiv Sievierodonetsk Mariupol Kharkiv Poltava Sumy Chernihiv Zhytomyr Zaporizhia Dnipropetrovsk Rivne Lutsk Lviv Uzhgorod Ivano- Frankivsk Ternopil Khmelnytskyi Vinnytsa Cherkasy Kirovograd Odesa Mykolaiv Kherson Chernivtsi
- 24. The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. Compliance of political rights of women and young people IRI www.ratingpro.org 37% 33% 31% 25% 24% 22% 22% 21% 20% 20% 19% 19% 19% 19% 18% 17% 17% 16% 14% 12% 12% 10% 10% 8% 44% 30% 44% 55% 40% 34% 34% 54% 47% 38% 31% 62% 42% 40% 45% 46% 50% 51% 44% 48% 40% 42% 48% 39% 50% 48% 47% 45% 45% 40% 38% 38% 36% 35% 33% 33% 32% 31% 31% 30% 29% 27% 26% 26% 22% 21% 11% 9% 43% 49% 52% 53% 53% 66% 68% 65% 43% 49% 41% 43% 53% 41% 62% 37% 36% 52% 42% 53% 54% 46% 45% 49% considerthat«politiciansdonotlisten totheneedsandideasofwomen" proportionofwomeninthecitycouncil (byresultsoflocalelections2015) considerthat«politiciansdonotlisten totheneedsandideasofyoungpeople» proportionofdeputiesaged18-35inthecitycouncil (byresultsoflocalelections2015) Vinnytsa Sievierodonetsk Ivano-Frankivsk Odesa Rivne Sumy Kyiv Mykolaiv Lviv Zaporizhia Kharkiv Chernihiv Ternopil Lutsk Kirovograd Mariupol Dnipropetrovsk Chernivtsi Khmelnytskyi Zhytomyr Uzhgorod Poltava Kherson Cherkasy Kherson Uzhgorod Kharkiv Lutsk Lviv Kyiv Rivne Khmelnytskyi Ivano-Frankivsk Zaporizhia Poltava Chernivtsi Chernihiv Dnipropetrovsk Sievierodonetsk Cherkasy Vinnytsa Zhytomyr Odesa Sumy Mariupol Kirovograd Ternopil Mykolaiv
- 25. The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. Attitude toward people with disabilities IRI Vinnytsa Sievierodonetsk Ivano-Frankivsk Odesa Rivne Sumy Kyiv Mykolaiv Lviv Zaporizhia Kharkiv Chernihiv Ternopil Lutsk Kirovograd Mariupol Dnipropetrovsk Chernivtsi Khmelnytskyi Zhytomyr Uzhgorod Poltava Kherson Cherkasy www.ratingpro.org 1,0 1,3 1,6 1,9 2,2 2,5 2,8 Me, personally People in my surrounding Local government National government of the assessment of attitude toward people with disabilitiesIndex where 3 is «very positive», 2 – «somewhat positive», 1 – «somewhat negative», 0 – «very negative»
- 26. The International Republican Institute www.IRI.org | @IRI_Polls Government of Canada Survey of Sociological Group «Rating», March 2015 (17,600 respondents) and February 2016 (19,200 respondents). Conducted on order of the International Republican Institute (IRI) with support of the Government of Canada. Attitude toward people with disabilities IRI www.ratingpro.orgAggregate result for all the cities 88% 4% positive negative Me, personally People in my surrounding 35% 39% positive negative Local government 29% 43% positive negative National government Despite the fact that the vast majority of respondents declares positive attitude toward people with disabilities, other surveys show that not always such a tolerance is confirmed by the actions ... ... thus, only 40% of Ukrainians would feel comfortable if their direct supervisor at work was a person with disability ... only 37% would feel comfortable if their city mayor was a person with disability Meanwhile, tolerance toward people with disabilities is higher in villages than in cities By results of RatingPro Survey «Spread of Discrimination in Ukraine», May 2015, www.ratingpro.org 76% 10% positive negative