A Study On Quality Factors On Terry Towels

1. Quality Analysis Of Terry
Towels

2. OBJECTIVE
To do comparative analysis of
functional properties of terry
towels after treating with
softener and bioplishing
agents.

3. SOFTNER APPLIED
1.LUAMIN LXS
2.SLOUSOFT
BIOPOLISHING AGENT
Bacterial enzyme

4. Absorbency Results

5. Pile height Water
retained
Absorption%
3mm 87 13
5mm 89 11
6mm 91 9
ABSORBANCY BY SOFTNER(1)
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3
3mm/5mm/6mm pile height
water
retained(ml)/absorbancy(%)
Series1
Series2

6. Pile height Water
retained
Absorbancy%
3mm
73 27
5mm
70 30
6mm
65 35
ABSORBANCY BY SOFTNER(2)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1 2 3
3mm/5mm/6mm pile height
water
retained(ml)/absorbancy(%)
Series1
Series2

7. pile
height water retained absorbency%
3mm 58 42
5mm 51 49
6mm 50 50
ABSORBANCY BY BIOPOLISHING
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2 3
3mm/5mm/6mm pile height
waterretained/absorbancy
%
Series1
Series2

8. EFFECT OF SOFTNER AND BIOPOLISHING AT
DIFFERENT PILE HEIGHT
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1,2,3 SOFTNER(1)/6,7,8
SOFTNER(2)/11,12,13BIOPOLISHIED
ABSORBANCY/WATER
RETINED(ml)
Series1
Series2

9. Softness Results

10. SOFTNESS AT 3MM PILE HEIGHT
1.8
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
1 2 3 4 5
NO. OF READINGS
FABRICTHICKNESS
Series1
SOFTNESS AT 5MM PILE HEIGHT
1.8
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
1 2 3 4 5
NO. OF READINGS
FABRICTHICKNESS
Series1
SOFTNESS AT 6MM PILE HEIGHT
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.9
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
1 2 3 4 5
NO OF READINGS
FABRICTHICKNESS
Series1

11. SOFTNESS AT 3MM
2.5
2.55
2.6
2.65
2.7
2.75
2.8
1 2 3 4 5
NO OF READINGS
FABRICTHICKNESS
Series1
SOFTNESS AT 5MM
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
1 2 3 4 5
NO OF READINGS
FABRICTHICKNESS
Series1
SOFTNESS AT 6MM
1.9
1.95
2
2.05
2.1
2.15
2.2
2.25
1 2 3 4 5
NO OF READINGS
FABRICTHICKNESS
Series1

12. AT 3MM PILE HEIGHT
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
1 2 3 4 5
NO OF READINGS
FABRICTHICKNESS
Series1
AT 5MM PLIE HEIGHT
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
1 2 3 4 5
NO OF READINGS
FABRICTHICKNESS
Series1
AT 6MM PILE LENGHT
2.4
2.45
2.5
2.55
2.6
2.65
2.7
2.75
2.8
2.85
2.9
1 2 3 4 5
NO OF READINGS
FABRICTHICKNESS
Series1

13. Comparative result of softener (1)
EFFECT OF SOFTNER(1) ON DIFFERENT PILE
HEIGHT
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
1 2 3 4 5
NO OF READINGS
THICKNESS
Series1
Series2
Series3

14. Comparative result of softener (2)
EFFECT OF SOFTNER(2) ON DIFFERENT PILE
HEIGHT
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
1 2 3 4 5
NO OF READINGS
THICKNESS
Series1
Series2
Series3

15. EFFECT OF BIOPOLISHING
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
1 2 3 4 5
NO OF READINGS
FABRICTHICKNESS
Series1
Series2
Series3
Comparative result of biopolishing

16. SUMMARY OF RESULTS
 We got significant difference in softness
of terry towel after application of
softener as compare to boipolishing
agent.
 Biopolishing have mild effect on
softness.
 We got significant difference in
absorbency of terry towel samples after
application of biopolishing as compare
to both the softeners.