This document discusses poverty, inequality, and methods for measuring them. It begins by defining poverty as a lack of basic needs and outlines its key characteristics. It then defines inequality as disparities in things like income, power, and opportunity. The document examines questions about the relationship between economic growth, income distribution, and poverty. It explores how poverty and inequality are measured using methods like the headcount index, poverty gap, Gini coefficient, and Foster-Greer-Thorbecke index. Overall, the document provides an overview of key concepts and issues relating to poverty, inequality, and their measurement.
Even It Up - Time to End Extreme Inequality: Comments by Dean JolliffeWB_Research
Comments prepared for launch event of “Even it Up: Time to End Extreme Poverty”
IMF, October 31, 2014.
The views represented in these comments are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank.
Even It Up - Time to End Extreme Inequality: Comments by Dean JolliffeWB_Research
Comments prepared for launch event of “Even it Up: Time to End Extreme Poverty”
IMF, October 31, 2014.
The views represented in these comments are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank.
Rough sample project for class 12 on poverty its only rough project it will give 90% hint to all who use this project highly recommended for school project
Functional Income inequality and the post 2015 Agenda - presentation by Rolp...reinoutthebroker
Rolph van der Hoeven, ISS
For the occasion of The Development Studies Association Annual Conference 2013
16 November 2013, Birmingham
Panel 25: Inequality and the Post 2015 Agenda, organised by the Broker
http://thebrokeronline.eu/Articles/Inequality-is-politics
Poverty and Inequality Measurement.pptxKirti441999
This ppt talks about the poverty and inequality measures as mentioned in Alkire and Santos Chapter 6.
It talks about the various measures of poverty and the limitations of using income measurement as a criteria of poverty.
It gives a complete idea of various ways to reduce the gap between the rich and poor people in India and finding the ways of such an inequality in income
Rough sample project for class 12 on poverty its only rough project it will give 90% hint to all who use this project highly recommended for school project
Functional Income inequality and the post 2015 Agenda - presentation by Rolp...reinoutthebroker
Rolph van der Hoeven, ISS
For the occasion of The Development Studies Association Annual Conference 2013
16 November 2013, Birmingham
Panel 25: Inequality and the Post 2015 Agenda, organised by the Broker
http://thebrokeronline.eu/Articles/Inequality-is-politics
Poverty and Inequality Measurement.pptxKirti441999
This ppt talks about the poverty and inequality measures as mentioned in Alkire and Santos Chapter 6.
It talks about the various measures of poverty and the limitations of using income measurement as a criteria of poverty.
It gives a complete idea of various ways to reduce the gap between the rich and poor people in India and finding the ways of such an inequality in income
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
2. 1. What is the extent of relative inequality, and how is this
related to the extent of poverty?
2. Who are the poor?
3. Who benefits from economic growth?
4. Does rapid growth necessarily cause greater income
inequality?
5. Do the poor benefit from growth?
6. Are high levels of inequality always bad?
7. What policies can reduce poverty?
2
Distribution and Development: 7 Critical Questions
3. Economic Poverty and Inequalities focuses on distribution
of income:
• inequalities of power • Prestige
• Status • gender
• job satisfaction • conditions of work
• degree of participation • freedom of choice
• self-esteem, and many other dimensions of capabilities to
function.
• As in most social relationships, we cannot really separate the
economic from the noneconomic manifestations of inequality
3
POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
4. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
POVERTY
“Poverty is hunger. Poverty is lack of shelter. Poverty is being sick and not
being able to see a doctor. Poverty is not having access to school and not knowing
how to read. Poverty is not having a job, is fear for the future, living one day at a
time.”
“Poverty has many faces, changing from place to place and across time, and
has been described in many ways. Most often, poverty is a situation people want to
escape. So poverty is a call to action -- for the poor and the wealthy alike -- a call to
change the world so that many more may have enough to eat, adequate shelter,
access to education and health, protection from violence, and a voice in what
happens in their communities.”
- The World Bank Organization
5. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
POVERTY
• Under nutrition and poor health
• Little or no literacy
• Lives in environmentally degraded areas
Living on a small marginal farms or in a dilapidated
urban slums
• Have little political voice, are socially excluded
• Day laborers
6. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
Despite significant improvements over the past half century, extreme
poverty remains widespread in the developing world
• In 2015, almost 750M people live on less than $1.90
per day at 2011 U.S. PPP (2018 World Bank estimate).
• some 2B more than 25% of the world’s population
- live on less than $3.2 a day
7. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
• Development requires a higher gross national income (GNI), and
hence sustained growth, is clear.
• Once a country reach the average income to $10,000 to $20,000 (per
year) per capita ($27.4 to $54.79 per day)
• most citizens have usually escaped extreme poverty.
• At these levels, despite substantial variations across countries, if
inequality is not extreme, a majority of citizens are usually relatively
well nourished, healthy, and educated.
8. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
• Development requires a higher gross national income (GNI), and
hence sustained growth, is clear.
• Once a country reach the average income to $10,000 to $20,000 (per
year) per capita ($27.4 to $54.79 per day)
• most citizens have usually escaped extreme poverty.
• At these levels, despite substantial variations across countries, if
inequality is not extreme, a majority of citizens are usually relatively
well nourished, healthy, and educated.
9. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
INEQUALITY
• “the quality of being unequal or uneven” (dictionary)
• social disparity
• disparity of distribution or opportunity
• lack of evenness
• the condition of being variable : CHANGEABLENESS
10. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
ECONOMIC INEQUALITY
• Economic inequalities are most obviously shown by
people’s different positions within the economic
distribution - income, pay, wealth.
• People’s economic positions are also related to other
characteristics, such as whether or not they have a
disability, their ethnic background, or whether they are a
man or a woman.
11. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
• In this chapter, we will examine the following critical questions about
the relationship among economic growth, income distribution, and
poverty:
1. How can we best measure inequality and poverty?
2. What is the extent of relative inequality in developing countries,
and how is this related to the extent of absolute poverty?
3. Who are the poor, and what are their economic characteristics?
4. What determines the nature of economic growth—that is, who
benefits from economic growth, and why?
12. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
• In this chapter, we will examine the following critical questions about
the relationship among economic growth, income distribution, and
poverty:
5. Are rapid economic growth and more equal distributions of income
compatible or conflicting objectives for low-income countries? To
put it another way, is rapid growth achievable only at the cost of
greater inequalities in the distribution of income, or can a lessening
of income disparities contribute to higher growth rates?
6. Do the poor benefit from growth, and does this depend on the
type of growth a developing country experiences? What might be
done to help the poor benefit more?
13. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
• In this chapter, we will examine the following critical questions about
the relationship among economic growth, income distribution, and
poverty:
7. What is it about extreme inequality that is so harmful to economic
development?
8. What kinds of policies are required to reduce the magnitude and
extent of absolute poverty?
9. What has been learned about the psychological dimensions of
poverty, and how can this research help us design and implement
more effective poverty programmes?
14. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
MEASURING INEQUALITY
Size Distribution
• Economists and statisticians therefore like to arrange all
individuals by ascending personal incomes and then divide
the total population into distinct groups, or sizes
• quintiles (fifths)
• deciles (tenths)
16. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
Kuznets Ratio
• Nobel laureate Simon Kuznets
• Measure of degree of inequality between high and low
income group
• income inequality that can be derived from column 3 is
the ratio of the incomes received by the top 20% and
bottom 40% of the population and approximately 3.64.
17. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
MEASURING INEQUALITY
Bottom 40%
Top 20%
Kuznets Ratio (income inequality) = 20% of population / 40% population
= 51 / 14
= 3.64
19. Lorenz Curve
Lorenz Curve
• Another common way to analyze personal income statistics
• The more the Lorenz line curves away from the diagonal (line of
perfect equality), the greater the degree of inequality
represented.
21. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
MEASURING INEQUALITY
• Lorenz Curve The greater the
degree of
inequality, the
greater the
bend and the
closer to the
bottom
horizontal axis
the Lorenz
curve will be.
22. Gini Coefficients
Gini Coefficients and Aggregate Measures of Inequality
• Gini coefficients are aggregate inequality measures and can vary anywhere
from 0 (perfect equality) to 1 (perfect inequality).
24. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
MEASURING INEQUALITY
5.1.3 Gini Coefficients and Aggregate Measures of Inequality
• Sample Gini Coefficients
• Low
- Mauritius, China, Vietnam, Hungary
• High
- Botswana, Turkey, Iran, Malaysia, Brazil
25. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
MEASURING INEQUALITY
5.1.3 Gini Coefficients and Aggregate Measures of Inequality
The Gini has 4 desirable properties:
1. Anonymity
2. Scale dependence
3. Population independence
4. Transfer principles (Pigou-Dalton)
26. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
MEASURING INEQUALITY
5.1.3 Gini Coefficients and Aggregate Measures of Inequality
The Gini has 4 desirable properties:
1. Anonymity: Should not depend on who is rich and who is poor and judgements
about whether good or bad people
2. Scale dependence: Should not depend on size of country or currency
3. Population independence: Should not depend on pop. Size
4. Transfer principles (Pigou-Dalton): If we transfer income form a rich person to
a poor person, the resulting new distance is more equal (assuming the poor
don’t become richer than the rich)
27. POVERTY AND INEQUALITY
MEASURING ABSOLUTE POVERTY
• the number of people who are unable to command sufficient
resources to satisfy basic need
• They are counted as the total number living below a specified
minimum level of real income an international poverty line.
• less than $1.9 per day in PPP dollars
28. Headcount Index
Income Poverty
• Headcount Index: H/N
• Where H is the number of persons who are poor, and N is
the total number of people in the economy
• We defined the Headcount Index as the proportion of
country’s population living below the poverty line
29. Total Poverty Gap
Income Poverty
• Total Poverty Gap:
• Where Yp is the absolute poverty line; and Yi is the income
of the poor person
• Measures the total amount of income necessary to raise
everyone who is below line up to that line.
31. Average Poverty Gap
APG
• On a per capita basis, the average poverty gap (APG) is
found by dividing the TPG by the total population:
• Where N is number of persons in the economy
• TPG is total poverty gap
32. Normalized Poverty Gap
NPG, Normalized Income Shortfall Measure
• This measure lies between 0 and 1 and so can be useful
when we want a unitless measure of the gap for easier
comparisons.
NPG = APG
Yp
33. Average Income Shortfall
AIS
• AIS tells us the average amount by which the income of a
poor person falls below the poverty line.
AIS = TPG
H
34. Foster Greer Thorbecke (FGT) Index
FGT
• A well-known poverty index that in certain forms satisfies all four
criteria.
• Anonymity (should not depend who is the poor).
• Population Independence (should not depend on whether the country
has a large or small population).
• Monotonicity (if you add income to someone below the poverty line, all
other incomes held constant, poverty can be no greater than it was.
• Distributional sensitivity principle (other things being equal, if you
transfer income from a poor person to a richer person, the resulting
economy should be deemed strictly poorer).
35. Foster Greer Thorbecke (FGT) Index
• Where Yi is the income of the ith poor person, Yp is the
poverty line, and N is the population.
• N is the number of persons, H is the number of poor
persons, and α≥0 is a parameter
• When α=0,we get the headcount index measure
• we get the normalised (per capita) poverty gap
• When α=2,we get the “P2” measure
• we account for poverty severity
36. Multidimensional Poverty Measurement
• Poverty cannot be adequately measured with income
alone.
• A poor person is identified through what is called the “dual
cutoff method”
• First, the cutoff levels within each of the dimensions (analogous to
falling below a poverty line such as $1.90 per day if income poverty
were being addressed)
• Second, the cutoff of the number of dimensions in which a person must
be deprived (below the line) to be deemed multidimensionally poor.
37. 37
Poverty, Inequality, and Social Welfare
• What’s So Bad about Extreme Inequality?
• Dualistic Development and Shifting Lorenz Curves: Some
Stylized Typologies
• Traditional sector enrichment
• Modern sector enrichment
• Modern sector enlargement
• Kuznet’s Inverted U-Hypothesis
• Growth and Inequality
38. 38
◦ Income equality usually leads to economic inefficiency.
◦ Unable to have adequate education or start and expand
business.
◦ Relative Poverty leads to low credit ratings: savings lower, less
investment.
◦ The rich tend to invest abroad, buy imported luxury, and
sometime seek. safe havens abroad for their savings or
investment.
39. 39
1. Traditional Sector Enrichment growth typology.
- in which all of the benefits of growth are divided
among traditional-sector workers, with little or no
growth occurring in the modern sector.
Dualistic Development and Shifting Lorenz Curves
40. 40
2. Modern-sector enrichment growth typology.
- Limited to a fixed number of people in the modern
sector, with both the numbers of workers and their
wages held constant in the traditional sect
Dualistic Development and Shifting Lorenz Curves
41. 41
3. Modern-sector enlargement growth typology.
-Enlarging the size of its modern sector while
maintaining constant wages in both sectors
Dualistic Development and Shifting Lorenz Curves
42. 42
The Inverted-U Kuznet Curve
• Early growth may, in accordance with the
Lewis model, be concentrated in the
modern industrial sector, where
employment is limited but wages and
productivity are high
• Modern sector demands skills and then
may fall as the supply of educated
workers increases and the supply of
unskilled workers falls. So, while Kuznets
did not specify the mechanism by which
his inverted-U hypothesis was supposed
to occur, it could in principle be
consistent with a sequential process of
economic development.
44. 44
• Observations on Latin American countries are circled: all
the highest-inequality countries in their data come from
that region. Statistically, when the Latin American
identity of the country is controlled for, the inverted-U
drawn in Figure 5.10 tends to disappear in this data set
and others as well.
Kuznets Curve with Latin American Countries Identified
46. 46
Growth and Inequality
• Consider now the relationship,
between levels of per capita
income and degree of inequality.
Are higher incomes associated with
greater or lesser inequality, or can
no definitive statement be made?
47. 47
Absolute Poverty and Extent of Magnitude
• The data show that in 2010 some 1.22
billion people lived below $1.90 per day,
and some 2.36 billion below $3.80 per day
• The $3.80 per day income poverty fell
from about 1.94 billion from 1981 to 2010 a
37% reduction in the headcount.
• The drop in the number living on less than
$2 per day was much smaller under 8%
48. 48
Absolute Poverty and Extent of Magnitude
• The incidence of extreme poverty is very
uneven around the developing world.
Household survey-based estimates are
regarded as the most accurate ways to
estimate poverty incidence.
• For example, it can be seen that about 15%
of Bangladesh’s population lived below
the $1.90-a-day poverty line, while about
65% lived on less than $3.80 per day. In
Brazil, these figures are about 5% and 12%,
respectively.
49. 35
Multi Dimensional Poverty Index
▶ The MPI incorporates 3 dimensions at the household level: health, education and wealth
• The health dimension has two parts:
• Nutrition and child mortality. First, a household is designated as deprived
in nutrition if there is a child who is either stunted or underweight; for
family members aged 15 and older, body mass index (BMI) cutoffs are the
indicators for the nutrition dimension.
• Second, a household is considered deprived if any child has died in the.
• The education dimension also has two parts:
• First, regarding school attainment, a household is designated as deprived
if no member at least 10 years old has completed 6 years of schooling.
• Second, regarding attendance, a household is deprived if any child is not
attending school up to the age at which students finish eighth grade (class
8).
• Finally, in terms of standard of living (Wealth)
• lack of electricity; insufficiently safe drinking water; inadequate sanitation;
inadequate housing; unimproved cooking fuel; and lacking ownership
51. 51
Economic Characteristics of High Poverty Groups
• Children and Poverty
• The level of poverty is greater among children than among adults.
• Women and Poverty
• Women and children experience the harshest deprivation Children
and Poverty
• Ethnic Minorities, Indigenous Populations, and Poverty
• limited resources and job opportunities
53. 53
Growth and Poverty
• A rapid growth is bad for the poor because they would be bypassed and
marginalized by the structural changes of modern growth.
• There are at least five reasons why policies focused toward reducing poverty levels
need not lead to a slower rate of growth and indeed could help to accelerate
growth.
• First, widespread poverty creates conditions in which the poor have no access
to credit, are unable to finance their children’s education, and, in the absence
of physical or monetary investment opportunities, have many children as a
source of old-age financial security
• Second, a wealth of empirical data bears witness to the fact that, unlike the
historical experience of the now-developed countries, the rich in many
contemporary poor countries are generally not noted for their frugality or for
their desire to save and invest substantial proportions of their incomes in the
local economy.
• Third, the low incomes and low levels of living for the poor, which are
manifested in poor health, nutrition, and education, can lower their economic
productivity and thereby lead directly and indirectly to a slower -growing
economy.
54. 54
Growth and Poverty
• Fourth, raising the income levels of the poor will stimulate an overall increase
in the demand for locally produced necessity products such as food and
clothing, whereas the rich tend to spend more of their additional incomes on
imported luxury goods.
• Fifth, a reduction of mass poverty can stimulate healthy economic expansion by
acting as a powerful material and psychological incentive to widespread public
participation in the development process.
55. 55
Labour, the Functional Distribution of Income, and
Inclusive Development
• The functional or factor share distribution of income, is based on the share of
total national income that each of the factors of production (land, labor, and
capital) receives.
• Functional income distribution = Wages as a percentage of Profits
56. Policy Options on Income Inequality and Poverty: Some Basic
Consideration
• Altering the functional distribution
• Traditional economic approach
• Institutional constraints and faulty government policies resulted to a higher relative
price of labor in the formal, modern and urban sector than what would be determined by
the free interplay of the forces of supply and demand.
• Correctingfactorprices
• Modifying the size distribution through increasing assets of the poor
• The ultimate cause of unequal distribution of personal income in developing countries
is the unequal and highly concentrated patterns of asset ownership(wealth).
• Reducing the concentrated control of assets, the unequal distribution of power and the
unequal access to educational and income-earning opportunities.
57. Policy Options on Income Inequality and Poverty: Some Basic
Consideration
• Progressive Income and Wealth Taxes
• To improve the living standards of the bottom 40%, any national policy must secure
sufficient financial resources to transform paper plans to program realities.
• The major source of such development finance is the direct and progressive taxation
of both income and wealth.
• Direct Transfer Payments and the Public of Goods and Services
• Resources are limited.
• Beneficiaries become unduly dependent on the poverty programs.
• Beneficiaries become diver : people who are productively engaged in alternative economic activities
to participate in the poverty program instead.
• Poverty policies are often limited by resentment from the nonpoor.
Editor's Notes
Table 5.1 shows a hypothetical but fairly typical distribution of income for a developing country. In this table, 20 individuals, representing the entire population of the country, are arranged in order of ascending annual personal income, ranging from the individual with the lowest income (0.8 units) to the one with the highest (15.0 units). The total or national income of all individuals amounts to 100 units and is the sum of all entries in column 2. In column 3, the population is grouped into quintiles of four individuals each.
The first quintile Personal distribution of income (size distribution of income) The distribution of income according to size class of persons—for example, the share of total income accruing to the poorest specific percentage or the richest specific percentage of a population—without regard to the sources of that income. Quintile A 20% proportion of any numerical quantity. A population divided into quintiles would be divided into five groups of equal size. Decile A 10% portion of any numerical quantity; a population divided into deciles would be divided into ten equal numerical groups. represents the bottom 20% of the population on the income scale. This group receives only 5% (i.e., a total of 5 money units) of the total national income. The second quintile (individuals 5 to 8) receives 9% of the total income. Alternatively, the bottom 40% of the population (quintiles 1 plus 2) is receiving only 14% of the income, while the top 20% (the fifth quintile) of the population receives 51% of the total income
In the modern-sector enrichment growth typology, growth results in higher incomes, a less equal relative distribution of income, and no change in poverty. Modern-sector enrichment growth causes the Lorenz curve to shift downward and farther from the line of equality
Modern-sector enlargement growth, absolute incomes rise, and absolute poverty is reduced, but the Lorenz curves will always cross, indicating that we cannot make any unambiguous statement about changes in relative inequality it may improve or worsen
What clearly emerges from Table 5.3 is that per capita incomes are not necessarily related to inequality. The very poorest coun - tries, such as Niger, may have low inequality simply because there is so little income. But even very poor countries such as Mozambique have extremely high inequality by international standards.
Brazil and Mexico have very low MPI levels of just 0.016 and 0.025 respectively, while the world’s most impoverished country for which data were available to compute the MPI, Niger, has an MPI value of 0.591, which actually represents a significant improvement over its 2013 score of 0.642.
Altering the functional distribution, the returns to labor, land, and capital as determined by factor prices, utilization levels, and the consequent shares of national income that accrue to the owners of each factor.
Mitigating the size distribution—the functional income distribution of an economy translated into a size distribution by knowledge of how ownership and control over productive assets and labor skills are concentrated and distributed throughout the population. The distribution of these asset holdings and skill endowments ultimately determines the distribution of personal income.
Moderating (reducing) the size distribution at the upper levels through progressive taxation of personal income and wealth.
Moderating (increasing) the size distribution at the lower levels through public expenditures of tax revenues to raise the incomes of the poor either directly (e.g., by conditional or unconditional cash transfers) or indirectly (e.g., through public employment creation such as local infrastructure projects or the provision of primary education and health care).
Altering the functional distribution, the returns to labor, land, and capital as determined by factor prices, utilization levels, and the consequent shares of national income that accrue to the owners of each factor.
Mitigating the size distribution—the functional income distribution of an economy translated into a size distribution by knowledge of how ownership and control over productive assets and labor skills are concentrated and distributed throughout the population. The distribution of these asset holdings and skill endowments ultimately determines the distribution of personal income.
Moderating (reducing) the size distribution at the upper levels through progressive taxation of personal income and wealth.
Moderating (increasing) the size distribution at the lower levels through public expenditures of tax revenues to raise the incomes of the poor either directly (e.g., by conditional or unconditional cash transfers) or indirectly (e.g., through public employment creation such as local infrastructure projects or the provision of primary education and health care).