More Related Content Similar to chapter2-2-_to_be_sent.ppt................ Similar to chapter2-2-_to_be_sent.ppt................ (20) More from ssuser486a8b (13) chapter2-2-_to_be_sent.ppt................2. 2-2
LP Model Formulation – Minimization (1 of 8)
Chemical Contribution
Brand
Nitrogen
(lb/bag)
Phosphate
(lb/bag)
Super-gro 2 4
Crop-quick 4 3
A farmer is preparing to plant a crop in the spring and needs to fertilize
a field. There are two brands of fertilizer to choose from, Super-gro
and Crop-quick. Each brand yields a specific amount of nitrogen
and phosphate per bag, as follows:
The farmer’s field requires at least 16 pounds of nitrogen and at least
24 pounds of phosphate. Super-gro costs $6 per bag, and Crop-
quick costs $3. The farmer wants to know how many bags of each
brand to purchase in order to minimize the total cost of fertilizing.
3. 2-3
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
LP Model Formulation – Minimization (2 of 8)
Figure 2.15 Fertilizing
farmer’s field
4. 2-4
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Decision Variables:
x1 = number of bags of Super-gro to purchase
x2 = number of bags of Crop-quick to purchase
The Objective Function:
Minimize Z = $6x1 + 3x2
Where: $6x1 = cost of bags of Super-Gro
$3x2 = cost of bags of Crop-Quick
Model Constraints:
2x1 + 4x2 16 lb (nitrogen constraint)
4x1 + 3x2 24 lb (phosphate constraint)
x1, x2 0 (non-negativity constraint)
LP Model Formulation – Minimization (3 of 8)
5. 2-5
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Minimize Z = $6x1 + $3x2
subject to: 2x1 + 4x2 16
4x1 + 3x2 24
x1, x2 0
Figure 2.16 Graph of Both Model Constraints
Constraint Graph – Minimization (4 of 8)
6. 2-6
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Figure 2.17 Feasible Solution Area
Feasible Region– Minimization (5 of 8)
Minimize Z = $6x1 + $3x2
subject to: 2x1 + 4x2 16
4x1 + 3x2 24
x1, x2 0
7. 2-7
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Figure 2.18 Optimum Solution Point
Optimal Solution Point – Minimization (6 of 8)
Minimize Z = $6x1 + $3x2
subject to: 2x1 + 4x2 16
4x1 + 3x2 24
x1, x2 0
8. 2-8
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
A surplus variable is subtracted from a constraint to
convert it to an equation (=).
A surplus variable represents an excess above a
constraint requirement level.
A surplus variable contributes nothing to the calculated
value of the objective function.
Subtracting surplus variables in the farmer problem
constraints:
2x1 + 4x2 - s1 = 16 (nitrogen)
4x1 + 3x2 - s2 = 24 (phosphate)
Surplus Variables – Minimization (7 of 8)
9. 2-9
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Figure 2.19 Graph of Fertilizer Example
Graphical Solutions – Minimization (8 of 8)
Minimize Z = $6x1 + $3x2 + 0s1 + 0s2
subject to: 2x1 + 4x2 – s1 = 16
4x1 + 3x2 – s2 = 24
x1, x2, s1, s2 0
10. 2-10
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
For some linear programming models, the general rules
do not apply.
Special types of problems include those with:
Multiple optimal solutions
Infeasible solutions
Unbounded solutions
Irregular Types of Linear Programming Problems
11. 2-11
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Figure 2.20 Example with Multiple Optimal Solutions
Multiple Optimal Solutions Beaver Creek Pottery
Maximize Z=$40x1 + 30x2
subject to: 1x1 + 2x2 40
4x2 + 3x2 120
x1, x2 0
Where:
x1 = number of bowls
x2 = number of mugs
12. 2-12
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Figure 2.20 Example with Multiple Optimal Solutions
Multiple Optimal Solutions Beaver Creek Pottery
The objective function is
parallel to a constraint line.
Maximize Z=$40x1 + 30x2
subject to: 1x1 + 2x2 40
4x2 + 3x2 120
x1, x2 0
Where:
x1 = number of bowls
x2 = number of mugs
13. 2-13
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
An Infeasible Problem
Figure 2.21 Graph of an Infeasible Problem
Maximize Z = 5x1 + 3x2
subject to: 4x1 + 2x2 8
x1 4
x2 6
x1, x2 0
14. 2-14
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
An Infeasible Problem
Figure 2.21 Graph of an Infeasible Problem
Every possible solution
violates at least one constraint:
Maximize Z = 5x1 + 3x2
subject to: 4x1 + 2x2 8
x1 4
x2 6
x1, x2 0
15. 2-15
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
An Unbounded Problem
Figure 2.22 Graph of an Unbounded Problem
Maximize Z = 4x1 + 2x2
subject to: x1 4
x2 2
x1, x2 0
16. 2-16
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
An Unbounded Problem
Figure 2.22 Graph of an Unbounded Problem
Value of the objective
function increases indefinitely:
Maximize Z = 4x1 + 2x2
subject to: x1 4
x2 2
x1, x2 0
17. 2-17
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Characteristics of Linear Programming Problems
A decision amongst alternative courses of action is required.
The decision is represented in the model by decision variables.
The problem encompasses a goal, expressed as an objective
function, that the decision maker wants to achieve.
Restrictions (represented by constraints) exist that limit the
extent of achievement of the objective.
The objective and constraints must be definable by linear
mathematical functional relationships.
18. 2-18
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Proportionality - The rate of change (slope) of the objective
function and constraint equations is constant.
Additivity - Terms in the objective function and constraint
equations must be additive.
Divisibility -Decision variables can take on any fractional value
and are therefore continuous as opposed to integer in nature.
Certainty - Values of all the model parameters are assumed to
be known with certainty (non-probabilistic).
Properties of Linear Programming Models
19. 2-19
Problem Statement
Example Problem No. 1 (1 of 4)
Moore’s Meat Company produces a hot dog mixture in 1,000-pound
batches, The mixture contains two ingredients chicken and beef. The cost
per pound of each of these ingredients is as follow:
Ingredient Cost/lb.
Chicken $3
Beef $5
Each batch has the following recipe requirements:
a. At least 500 pounds of chicken.
b. At least 200 pounds of beef.
The ratio of chicken to beef must be at least 2 to 1. The company wants
to know the optimal mixture of ingredients that will minimize cost.
Formulate a linear programming model for this problem.
20. 2-20
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Problem Statement
Example Problem No. 1 (2 of 4)
■ Hot dog mixture in 1000-pound batches.
■ Two ingredients, chicken ($3/lb) and beef ($5/lb).
■ Recipe requirements:
at least 500 pounds of “chicken”
at least 200 pounds of “beef”
■ Ratio of chicken to beef must be at least 2 to 1.
■ Determine optimal mixture of ingredients that will
minimize costs.
23. 2-23
Solve the following model graphically:
Maximize Z = 4x1 + 5x2
subject to: x1 + 2x2 10
6x1 + 6x2 36
x1 4
x1, x2 0
Example Problem No. 2 (1 of 4)