This grading guide provides the criteria for evaluating a student presentation on measures of intelligence. The presentation will be graded on content (60%), organization and development (20%), and mechanics and format (20%). For content, the presentation should critique definitions of intelligence, relate measures to theories of intelligence, and compare intelligence and achievement assessments. It should also explain the tests' purposes and how their goals are similar or different. The presentation should be 12-15 slides, clearly organized with supporting details, and use visual/auditory aids effectively. It must also follow proper formatting, have no grammatical errors, and be consistent with APA style.

1. Grading Guide: Measures of Intelligence Presentation
PSYCH/655 Version 1
1
Grading Guide
Measures of Intelligence Presentation
This assignment is due in Week Five.
Content
60 Percent
Points Earned
X/6
Critiques the major definitions of intelligence
Determines which theory of intelligence best fits the selected
instruments
Explains how the definition and the measures are related
Evaluates the measures of intelligence selected for reliability,
validity, normative procedures, and bias
Compares and contrasts the selected intelligence and
achievement assessments
Describes how the goals of the tests are similar and different
Describes how the tests are used
Describes the purposes of giving these differing tests
Comments:
Organization and Development
20 Percent
Points Earned
X/2
The presentation is 12 to 15 slides.
The presentation is clear and organized; major points are
supported by details, examples, or analysis.
The presentation uses visual and auditory aids appropriately and
effectively.
The presentation effectively incorporates design elements, such
as font, color, headings, and spacing.
The presentation is logical, flows, and reviews the major points.
Comments:
Mechanics and Format
20 Percent
Points Earned
X/2
The assignment file is presentable and functional; for example,
the audio clips are audible, visual components are viewable, and
links work appropriately.
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling
is correct throughout the presentation.
The presentation is consistent with APA guidelines.
Comments:
Additional Comments: Total Earned
X/10
Copyright © 2013 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.