PSYCH 655 Week 1 Individual Assignment Ethics in Assessment Paper (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Individual Assignment Validity and Reliability Worksheet
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Dr. Zak Case Study (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Construct Development, Scale Creation, and Process Analysis Paper (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 1 Individual Assignment Ethics in Assessment Paper (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Individual Assignment Validity and Reliability Worksheet
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Dr. Zak Case Study (2 Papers)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
PSYCH 655 Week 1 Individual Assignment Ethics in Assessment Paper (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Individual Assignment Validity and Reliability Worksheet
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Dr. Zak Case Study (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Construct Development, Scale Creation, and Process Analysis Paper (
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
PSYCH 655 Week 1 Individual Assignment Ethics in Assessment Paper (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Individual Assignment Validity and Reliability Worksheet
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Dr. Zak Case Study (2 Papers)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
PSYCH 655 Week 1 Individual Assignment Ethics in Assessment Paper (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Individual Assignment Validity and Reliability Worksheet
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Dr. Zak Case Study (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Construct Development, Scale Creation, and Process Analysis Paper (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 1 Individual Assignment Ethics in Assessment Paper (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Individual Assignment Validity and Reliability Worksheet
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Dr. Zak Case Study (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Construct Development, Scale Creation, and Process Analysis Paper (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 1 Individual Assignment Ethics in Assessment Paper (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Individual Assignment Validity and Reliability Worksheet
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Dr. Zak Case Study (2 Papers)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
PSYCH 655 Week 1 Individual Assignment Ethics in Assessment Paper (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Individual Assignment Validity and Reliability Worksheet
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Dr. Zak Case Study (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Construct Development, Scale Creation, and Process Analysis Paper (
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
PSYCH 655 Week 1 Individual Assignment Ethics in Assessment Paper (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Individual Assignment Validity and Reliability Worksheet
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Dr. Zak Case Study (2 Papers)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
PSYCH 655 Week 1 Individual Assignment Ethics in Assessment Paper (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Individual Assignment Validity and Reliability Worksheet
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Dr. Zak Case Study (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Construct Development, Scale Creation, and Process Analysis Paper (2 Papers)
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Set of Paper/PPT for each Assignment
PSYCH 635 Week 1 Individual Assignment Explaining Learning Theory to Clients (2 PPT)
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
NSG 512 Week 1 Study Analysis Preliminary Study Review
The ability to critique and evaluate various types of research articles is fundamental to evidence-based practice and generating new research.
Select two of the attached articles – one quantitative study and one
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
NSG 512 Week 1 Study Analysis Preliminary Study Review
The ability to critique and evaluate various types of research articles is fundamental to evidence-based practice and generating new research.
Select two of the attached articles – one quantitative study and one qualitative study. You will use these same articles for assignments in Weeks 3-5.
Nsg 512 Effective Communication / snaptutorial.comHarrisGeorg35
NSG 512 Week 1 Study Analysis Preliminary Study Review
The ability to critique and evaluate various types of research articles is fundamental to evidence-based practice and generating new research.
Select two of the attached articles – one quantitative study and one qualitative study. You will use these same articles for assignments in Weeks 3-5.
For each article, answer questions 1-5 from Box 3.3 Additional Questions for a Preliminary Review of a Study on p. 63 of Nursing Research (click the Exercise
This Tutorial contains 2 Set of Paper/PPT for each Assignment
PSYCH 635 Week 1 Individual Assignment Explaining Learning Theory to Clients (2 PPT)
PSYCH 635 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Ethics in Conditioning Research (2 Papers)
PSYCH 635 Week 2 Individual Assignment Professional Applications of Learning Theory in Real-Life Situations (3 PPT)
Creswell (2014) noted that qualitative research is an approach for exploring and understanding the meaning individuals or groups ascribe to a social or human problem. The article embodies a critical analysis of chapters one to twelve of Stake (2010). In chapter one, Qualitative research: How things work is seen as qualitative, is based on a comprehensive aim seeking to answer the questions why and how. It analyzes actions and interactions, taking into account the intentions of the actors. An analytic perspective on the interpretation of the Person as an instrument is the thrust of chapter two. Chapter three examines the experiential understanding: Most qualitative study is experiential, in this chapter stake (2010) discusses two common research approaches, qualitative and quantitative methods. Chapter four Stating the Problem: Questioning How This Thing Works. Chapter five deals with the Methods-Gatherings Data, while chapter six illuminates the Review of Literature: Zooming to See the Problem. In chapter seven, the author implores the evidence: Bolstering Judgment and Reconnoitering. Chapter eight propels Analysis and Synthesis: How Things Work. Chapter nine acts as a mirror that invites the researcher to examine their action research and Self-Evaluation: Finding our Own How our Place Works. Finally, in chapters ten to twelve, the author compels Storytelling: Illustrating How Things Work, Writing the Final Report: An Iterative Convergence, and Advocacy and Ethics: Making Things Work Better. This work is expected to guide future researchers in developing their research in qualitative research.
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers/PPT for all Assignments (Except Week 2 IA)
PSY 480 Week 1 Individual Assignment Examination of Clinical Psychology Paper (2 Papers)
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers/PPT for all Assignments (Except Week 2 IA)
PSY 480 Week 1 Individual Assignment Examination of Clinical Psychology Paper (2 Papers)
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This tutorial contains 2 Set of Papers for All Assignments
PSY 335 Week 1 Assignment Research Development Paper (2 Papers)
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Set of Paper/PPT for each Assignment
PSYCH 635 Week 1 Individual Assignment Explaining Learning Theory to Clients (2 PPT)
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
NSG 512 Week 1 Study Analysis Preliminary Study Review
The ability to critique and evaluate various types of research articles is fundamental to evidence-based practice and generating new research.
Select two of the attached articles – one quantitative study and one
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
NSG 512 Week 1 Study Analysis Preliminary Study Review
The ability to critique and evaluate various types of research articles is fundamental to evidence-based practice and generating new research.
Select two of the attached articles – one quantitative study and one qualitative study. You will use these same articles for assignments in Weeks 3-5.
Nsg 512 Effective Communication / snaptutorial.comHarrisGeorg35
NSG 512 Week 1 Study Analysis Preliminary Study Review
The ability to critique and evaluate various types of research articles is fundamental to evidence-based practice and generating new research.
Select two of the attached articles – one quantitative study and one qualitative study. You will use these same articles for assignments in Weeks 3-5.
For each article, answer questions 1-5 from Box 3.3 Additional Questions for a Preliminary Review of a Study on p. 63 of Nursing Research (click the Exercise
This Tutorial contains 2 Set of Paper/PPT for each Assignment
PSYCH 635 Week 1 Individual Assignment Explaining Learning Theory to Clients (2 PPT)
PSYCH 635 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Ethics in Conditioning Research (2 Papers)
PSYCH 635 Week 2 Individual Assignment Professional Applications of Learning Theory in Real-Life Situations (3 PPT)
Creswell (2014) noted that qualitative research is an approach for exploring and understanding the meaning individuals or groups ascribe to a social or human problem. The article embodies a critical analysis of chapters one to twelve of Stake (2010). In chapter one, Qualitative research: How things work is seen as qualitative, is based on a comprehensive aim seeking to answer the questions why and how. It analyzes actions and interactions, taking into account the intentions of the actors. An analytic perspective on the interpretation of the Person as an instrument is the thrust of chapter two. Chapter three examines the experiential understanding: Most qualitative study is experiential, in this chapter stake (2010) discusses two common research approaches, qualitative and quantitative methods. Chapter four Stating the Problem: Questioning How This Thing Works. Chapter five deals with the Methods-Gatherings Data, while chapter six illuminates the Review of Literature: Zooming to See the Problem. In chapter seven, the author implores the evidence: Bolstering Judgment and Reconnoitering. Chapter eight propels Analysis and Synthesis: How Things Work. Chapter nine acts as a mirror that invites the researcher to examine their action research and Self-Evaluation: Finding our Own How our Place Works. Finally, in chapters ten to twelve, the author compels Storytelling: Illustrating How Things Work, Writing the Final Report: An Iterative Convergence, and Advocacy and Ethics: Making Things Work Better. This work is expected to guide future researchers in developing their research in qualitative research.
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers/PPT for all Assignments (Except Week 2 IA)
PSY 480 Week 1 Individual Assignment Examination of Clinical Psychology Paper (2 Papers)
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers/PPT for all Assignments (Except Week 2 IA)
PSY 480 Week 1 Individual Assignment Examination of Clinical Psychology Paper (2 Papers)
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This tutorial contains 2 Set of Papers for All Assignments
PSY 335 Week 1 Assignment Research Development Paper (2 Papers)
Psy 480 Effective Communication - tutorialrank.comBartholomew807
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers/PPT for all Assignments (Except Week 2 IA)
PSY 480 Week 1 Individual Assignment Examination of Clinical Psychology Paper (2 Papers)
PSY 326 Research Methods Week 2 GuidanceWelcome to Week 2 of Res.docxwoodruffeloisa
PSY 326 Research Methods Week 2 Guidance
Welcome to Week 2 of Research Methods! This week, you will have an overview of qualitative versus quantitative, and experimental versus non-experimental research approaches. Required resources are sections 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, and 5.2 of the textbook (Newman, 2016), two research studies (Blixen, Perzyski, Bukah, Howland, & Sajatovic, 2016; Boyers & Rowe, 2018), and three helpful videos about writing research questions and hypotheses. The videos are linked in the Course Materials and the written assignment prompt.
Assignments for the week include a discussion, an interactive learning activity and quiz, a journal exercise, and a written assignment. To see how your assignments will be graded, look at the rubrics accessible through a link on the screen for each discussion or assignment.
The Week 2 discussion is Method Comparisons. Your initial post is due by Day 3, and all replies are due by Day 7. To prepare for the discussion, read the sections of the textbook listed above and the lecture portion of this instructor guidance. Your initial discussion post will have two parts. The first part is the same for everyone. Explain the similarities and differences between qualitative and quantitative research. Then, explain the difference between experimental and non-experimental research.
The second part of the post is a jigsaw puzzle. Instead of having the entire class read and report on four categories of research, each person will research and report on one category. Categories are assigned based on the first letter of your last name. When you determine your assigned category, use the Research Methods research guide and the databases in the Ashford University Library to find at least two scholarly/peer-reviewed articles about that type of research. Then, describe the features of the research category, name at least one specific research design in the category, and suggest a suitable topic for this type of research. Document your sources in APA style.
At least three replies to the initial posts of classmates will be required for this discussion, because you must read and respond to at least one post about each of the other three research categories. As the expert on your assigned category, you will also be expected to respond to questions posted on your thread by others. See the discussion prompt for complete details.
After you have learned about the research design categories from the assigned readings and participating in the discussion, you will be ready to do the interactive learning activity and take the quiz called Name That Design Category, due by Day 6. In the first part of the learning activity, match the name of the design category with its description. In the scenarios presented in the second part of the learning activity, you must select all categories of research that apply, and not select any that do not apply to the described research situation. When you have mastered the interactive learning activity, ...
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
This Tutorial contains All Latest Assignments (Week 3 Team Assignment contains Part A only)
BSHS 455 Week 1 Individual Assignment Conceptualizing Addiction (New Syllabus)
BSHS 455 Week 2 Team Assignment Functioning Addicts Presentation (New Syllabus
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
This Tutorial contains All Latest Assignments (Week 3 Team Assignment contains Part A only)
BSHS 455 Week 1 Individual Assignment Conceptualizing Addiction (New Syllabus)
PSY 250 Creative and Effective/newtonhelp.commyblue104
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Set of papers/PPT for each Assignment
PSY 250 Week 1 Personality and the Psychoanalytic Perspective Worksheet (2 Set)
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Set of papers/PPT for each Assignment
PSY 250 Week 1 Personality and the Psychoanalytic Perspective Worksheet (2 Set)
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Set of papers/PPT for each Assignment
PSY 250 Week 1 Personality and the Psychoanalytic Perspective Worksheet (2 Set)
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
1. PSYCH 655 All Assignments
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
PSYCH 655 Week 1 Individual Assignment Ethics in Assessment Paper (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Individual Assignment Validity and Reliability Worksheet
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Dr. Zak Case Study (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Construct Development, Scale
Creation, and Process Analysis Paper (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 4 Individual Assignment Personality Worksheet
PSYCH 655 Week 4 Learning Team Assignment Personality Assessment Instrument
Critique (2 PPT)
PSYCH 655 Week 5 Individual Assignment Measures of Intelligence Presentation (2
PPT)
PSYCH 655 Week 5 Learning Team Assignment Educational Assessment Podcast (2
Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 6 Individual Assignment Clinical Assessment in Mental Health
Centers Newspaper Article (2 Papers)
PSYCH 655 Week 6 Learning Team Assignment Neuropsychological Assessment
Presentation (2 PPT)
====================================
PSYCH 655 Week 1 Individual Assignment Ethics in Assessment Paper (2 Papers)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers
2. Resource: the American Psychological Association (APA) Code of Ethics
Select a legal case from the list in Table 2-1 in Ch. 2 of Psychological Testing and
Assessmentor another case related to psychological assessment.
Write a 1,500- to 1,750-word paper discussing:
The background of your selectedcase and the legal implications of the decision
• An analysis of the biases related to the assessments in the case
• The ethical implications for diverse populations in relationship to the case
• The role of norming in creating bias
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
==============================
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Individual Assignment Validity and Reliability Worksheet
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Resources: Reliability and Validity Worksheet
A valid instrument is one that measures what it says it measures. Validity depends on the
amount and type of evidence there is to support one’s interpretations concerning data that
has been collected. This week, you discussed three kinds of evidence that can be
collectedregarding validity: content-related, criterion-related, and construct-related
evidence.
1. How strong is the relationship between the students’ scores obtained using this
instrument and their teacher’s rating of their ability?
2. How adequately do the questions in the instrument represent that which is being
measured?
3. Do the items that the instrument contains logically reflect that which is being
measured?
3. 4. Are there a variety of different types of evidence (test scores, teacher ratings,
correlations, etc.) that all measure this variable?
5. How well do the scores obtained using this instrument predict future performance?
6. Is the format of the instrument appropriate
=====================================
PSYCH 655 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Dr. Zak Case Study (2 Papers)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers
Resource: Material: Dr. Zak Case Study
Complete the University of Phoenix Material: Dr. Zak Case Study.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
=============================
PSYCH 655 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Construct Development, Scale Creation,
and Process Analysis Paper (2 Papers)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers
4. Part I: Construct Development and Scale Creation
Choose a construct you would like to measure.
Create an operational definition of your construct using at least three peer-reviewed
journal articles as references.
Select and list five items used to sample the domain.
Select the method of scaling appropriate for the domain.
Justify why you selectedthe scaling method you did.
Format the items into an instrument with which you would query respondents.
Justify whether this is an interview or self-report instrument.
Part II: Analysis and Justification
Write a 1,500- to 1,750-word analysis of how you developed your instrument.
• Describe how you would norm this instrument and which reliability measures you
would use.
• Discuss how many people you would give it to.
• Describe the characteristics that your respondents would have.
• Explain to whom the instrument would be generalized.
• Describe how you would establish validity.
• Describe the methods you used for item selection.
• Discuss whether or not cut-off scores would be established.
• Explain how item selectionwill be evaluated.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
===============================
PSYCH 655 Week 4 Individual Assignment Personality Worksheet
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Resources: University Personality Worksheet
Search for the phrase “free personality test.” You will find links for many free tests
based on the various
personality theories.
Select and complete one test, and then answer the following questions.
1. Explain which test you took.
5. 2. What did your results say? (You may paste the results page here if you like.)
3. Did the page mention what theorist the test used to develop the test (such as Jung,
etc.)? While
taking the test, did the questions seem to correlate with the theory? Why or why not?
4. Provide a thoughtful description of your personality. Do you think the results were
accurate? If not,
then what was inaccurate?
5. Would you want this personality assessment to be used by a place of employment to
match you to a
job environment? To select you for a position? Why or why not?
What is your evaluation of your personality assessment and did you find it helpful? Do
you believe this
test to be valid and reliable? Explain
================================
PSYCH 655 Week 4 Learning Team Assignment Personality Assessment Instrument
Critique (2 PPT)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Presentations
Select one psychological personality assessment instrument or inventory to serve as the
basis of this assignment.
Explore the psychological literature to find three to five articles that test the use of this
inventory or assessment on a specific population.
Create a 15- to 20-slide presentation of an in-depth examination of your selectedtest and
its uses. Include the following in your presentation:
• A description of the characteristics, uses, and purposes of your selectedassessment
instrument or inventory, and how it would be used in the workplace
• An analysis of the relationship between your selectedassessment and one of the major
theories of personality
6. • A summary of your research findings, paying particular attention to differences in the
ability of the instrument to differentiate diagnostically between the target population and
the general population
• A list of psychometric properties of the test for the particular population
• A discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of assessment methods used
• A conclusion using a review of the literature on whether the instrument is an adequate
measure of your selectedcharacteristic, and any ethical considerations associated with
your selectedassessment
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
==============================
PSYCH 655 Week 5 Individual Assignment Measures of Intelligence Presentation (2
PPT)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Presentations
Access the Mental Measurements Yearbook, located in the University Library, through
the "Test Guides and Preparation" link.
Select two assessments of intelligence and two achievement tests.
Prepare a 12- to 15-slide presentation about your selectedinstruments. In your analysis,
address the following:
• Critique the major definitions of intelligence. Determine which theory of intelligence
best fits your selectedinstruments. Explain how the definition and the measures are
related.
• Evaluate the measures of intelligence you selectedfor reliability, validity, normative
procedures, and bias.
• Compare and contrast your selectedintelligence and achievement assessments. How are
the goals of the tests similar and different? How are the tests used? What are the purposes
of giving these differing tests?
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
=================================
PSYCH 655 Week 5 Learning Team Assignment Educational Assessment Podcast (2
Papers)
7. For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers
Create a 5- to 10-minute podcast discussing the following information:
• The use of assessments in education
• The ethical and cultural considerations associated with achievement and intelligence
tests in education
===============================
PSYCH 655 Week 6 Individual Assignment Clinical Assessment in Mental Health Centers
Newspaper Article (2 Papers)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Papers
Write a 1,000- to 1,250-word overview for the local newspaper centered on the value of
clinical assessments in mental health centers and the responsibilities of clinicians in
assessments.
Address the following assessment issues in your overview:
• Culturally informed assessments
• Assessments of addiction and substance abuse
• Custody evaluations
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
8. Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
================================
PSYCH 655 Week 6 Learning Team Assignment Neuropsychological Assessment
Presentation (2 PPT)
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
This Tutorial contains 2 Presentations
Your faculty member will assign each team only one of the following two presentations
to complete for this week:
Option 1
Select a neuropsychological assessment instrument and prepare a 10- to 15-minute oral
presentation, accompanied with a 7- to 10-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation,
in which your Learning Team:
Describes the instrument
• Explains how it is used to assess disability or neurological dysfunction
• Discusses how effective the instrument might be and if, or how it could be improved
*Online Campus students must submit a 7- to 10-slide Microsoft®PowerPoint®
including detailed speaker notes.
Format appropriate elements of your presentation consistent with APA guidelines.
Option 2
Select an assessment instrument used in a clinical setting and prepare a 10- to 15-minute
oral presentation, accompanied with a 7- to 10-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint®
presentation, in which your Learning Team:
Describes the instrument
• Describes its purposes and uses in a clinical setting
• Discusses any legal or ethical considerations for organizations that use the instrument
*Online Campus students must submit a 7- to 10-slide Microsoft®PowerPoint®
including detailed speaker notes.
Format appropriate elements of your presentation consistent with APA guidelines.
=====================================