Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Long-term musical training alters the interaction between frames of reference
1. Long-term musical training
alters the interaction
between frames of reference
Simon P. Landry
Doctoral candidate | Université de Montréal, Canada
Presented at the International Multisensory Research Forum
Suzhou, China
June 15th, 2016
1
2. Introduction
• Musical training can alter sensory abilities (Herholz et al.,
2012)
• Musicians have faster tactile RTs (Landry et al.,
submitted)
• Crossed arm TOJ task (Yamamoto et al., 2001).
• RTs increases when the SOA decrease (Yamamoto et al., 2001;
Heed et al., 2012).
• No significant difference between groups with pianists
• Excluded “inverted responses” (Kobor et al., 2006).
• Can eliminate a significant differences (Cadieux et al., 2010).
• The impact of musical training on this task and its RT
remains unknown.
2
4. Participants
• Musicians (n=17)
• 6 males; 11 females
• mean age=24
• Mean musical training: 92th percentile
• Control group (n=20)
• 5 males; 15 females
• mean age=24
• Mean musical training: 34th percentile
4
5. Methodology (Cadieux et al., 2010)
• Participants indicated which cube vibrated first using foot
pedals.
• 8 stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) :
• ±400ms, ±200ms, ±100ms, ±50ms
• + = right first, - = left first
• 40 times in random order
• Arms uncrossed and crossed.
• Uncrossed: Indicate which side vibrated first
• Crossed: Indicate which side in space vibrated first
• Unspeeded reaction times were recorded for every
stimulation.
5
11. Discussion
• Musicians have a higher PCD score.
• More incorrect responses in the crossed condition.
• Musicians have faster RTs:
• all crossed SOAs
• -200ms, -100ms, -50ms, and 50ms uncrossed SOAs
• Faster musician RT could cause incorrect responses.
• In accordance with a theory proposed by Shore et al. (2002)
• No time to consolidate conflicting information before TOJ response.
• New understanding of the behavioural mechanism
underlying the crossed-arm TOJ task.
• Novel insight on the effects of musical training on sensory
abilities.
11
Editor's Notes
Veridical: 10 of 18 controls; 8 of 15 pianists
Reverse TOJ: 8 of 18 controls; 7 of 15 pianists
proportion correct difference (PCD)
control (M=2.77, SD=1.14)
musicians (M=3.99, SD=1.71)
Veridical: 14 of 20 controls; 8 of 17 musicians
Reverse: 6 of 20 controls; 9 of 17 musicians
-400 ms 536.51 168.72 415.75 211.17 .061
-200 ms 643.36 221.91 494.67 164.56 .029*
-100 ms 850.29 295.92 627.92 195.56 .012*
-50 ms 1118.72 435.71 797.97 319.58 .017*
50 ms 1067.51 355.93 757.62 246.91 .005*
100 ms 803.80 263.20 625.11 234.77 .038
200 ms 612.05 201.51 494.84 181.97 .074
400 ms 494.95 186.52 397.50 177.54 .122
-400 ms 1033.05 330.16 722.30 325.71 .007*
-200 ms 1091.27 347.08 749.96 281.37 .003*
-100 ms 1230.61 443.15 844.45 284.24 .004*
-50 ms 1352.91 486.16 938.56 336.45 .005*
50 ms 1423.68 517.29 986.94 370.25 .006*
100 ms 1229.63 385.33 866.69 255.52 .002*
200 ms 1131.37 345.64 766.84 239.76 .001*
400 ms 996.75 314.69 716.61 261.06 .006*