The document discusses interpretations of "last days" prophecies in the Bible. It argues that references to the "last days" were fulfilled in the 1st century AD, not in a future time. It asserts that biblical prophecies only apply to the lineage of Jacob (Israel), not to other groups like Ishmaelites or modern Gentiles. The author claims many common Christian beliefs about end times, the Antichrist, and the Rapture are based on misinterpretations and mistranslations of the original Hebrew and Greek texts.

1. ==== ====
The Truth About The Last Days, Antichrist, The Rapture, More.
http://www.teachingfaith.com/content.cfm?id=304
==== ====
Have readers not wondered at the correct timing for 'last days,' for 'the end of all things,' or
Parousia? The New Testament is replete with warnings and admonishions concerning an
imminent close to the Messianic Kingdom, the last of Ten Ages, and a time for punishment of the
unfaithful. And for 2000 years, the superstitious and unscrupulous have endeavored to frighten
others with the same eminent and dire predictions. Of course, those charlatans and the ones
believing their unbelievable rhetoric, die each year and without any validation of predictions. Of
course, their prediction can not happen.
In II Timothy 3:1, "This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come." (The tone does
not necessarily indicate 'futurity,' but 'be aware,' 'obligation' and 'inevitable') This text might
mislead some into thinking Paul is talking about a future time; but II Timothy 1:10 (same missive,
earlier chapter) negates this notion.
The time is A.D. 68; and in the II Timothy instant, Paul speaks with an aorist intonation and thirty-
eight years after the Acts 2:16 statement proclaiming arrival of 'last days.' Were not verses
preceding Acts 2:17 voiced in A.D. 65 and referring back to A.D. 30? And were they not an
acknowledged fulfillment of 'last days' spoken by the prophet Joel (Joel 2:28), at Acts 2:16? These
are those days included in the Song of Moses (Deut. 32:44, c. 1400 B.C.), warning the children of
Israel to beware destruction in the 'latter end' (Deut. 32:29). A question arises, challenging
subsequent and modern expectations: How can we escape the children of Israel inference?
Deuteronomy 32:9 limits the inheritance implication to: "Jacob (Israel) is the lot of his inheritance."
How simple is the unembellished story! Ishmael, thus Islam, is expressly unmentioned in the
inheritance, having been disinherited many years previously.
Jacob's lineage does not include Lot, Ishmael, Esau, or any principal outside the special seed line.
This seed line remained exclusive to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob (Israel). Some would insist
Deuteronomy 32:21 to indicate handing over the kingdom to modernly defined Gentiles. Such is
nowhere indicated in any scripture. Misinterpretation might so indicate; but if handing over the
kingdom to Gentiles is/was the grand scheme -- would the provision absolving Gentiles from
receiving judgment with modernly perceived Jews not be an impossibility (notwithstanding
modernist 'Jews' to be a misnomer)-and though judgment be already accomplished? No other
biblical judgment is prophesied! But to be sure, the biblical Gentiles (exogamous tribal mixed-
breeds) are none other than Israel house constituents from Galilee, Samaria, and migrated areas.
Careful exegesis posits the sole participants to be tribal members and unchallengeable in scripture
witness. Additionally, consistency in symbols discloses Ten Ages, or Ten Kingdoms to be the
measure of seed line time-frame.
Only in the Greek mistranslation is Messiah (Christos) perceived to bring restoration to tradition's
mistaken Gentiles, in other than exogamous distinction; in truth, all Gentile reference is to

2. consanguineous tribesmen! Yet, the reference is mistakenly considered applicable to generic
humankind! Such assigns are not linguistically correct! In Bible vernacular, only Messianic
followers (tribesmen) could claim this distinction! Scripture denies the promise to any but
tribesmen and exogamous produce (gentiles).
As the redoubtable Bertrand Russell, atheist, proposed: "It is undesirable to believe a proposition
when there is no grounds whatsoever for supposing it true." While not popular with mainstream
devotees, Russell speaks a truth about the tenets unjustifiably accepted by religionists.
Outstandingly egregious, the modern 'Gentile' definition is an invention; biblical 'gentile' derives
from a transliterated word having roots in exogamy, 'marriage or progeny produced by tribes-
people and other than twelve-tribe bloodlines.' Thus, many half-breeds, or less than half-breeds
were still counted as seed line and also promised Abraham's endowment - but none without Israel
tribal blood were included. This observation is not worthy of debate, for in no instance can we find
other than Jacobean progeny included as principals in the 'last days' expedient. None!
In Genesis 17:20-:21, Abraham's God said, concerning Ishmael, "... I will make him a great nation.
But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the
next year." Thus the beneficent covenant was continued with Isaac. Therefore, Islam, as defined
by the Qur'an, lies outside the God Covenant and God-promise benefit extended to the 12 tribes.
We gain import from Galations 4:30, "... the son of the bondwoman (Ishmael, bw) shall not be heir
with the son of the freewoman (Isaac, bw). And in Galations 4:28, "Now we, brethren, as Isaac
was, are the children of promise,." We belabor the point only to establish intent beyond any
reasonable doubt.
Many claims are made to capture the minds and resources of unsuspecting victims. Those
induced into this grand scheme should beware what they hear, what they are led to believe, and
what they would impress on others. The Bible must rest on its own legal-historicism, set in
concrete as it were; for, its intent cannot be changed with any degree of credibility; therefore, any
deviation from the age-old historical record must weaken modern religion's very essence and
therefore its authenticity.
Advanced studies are available to clarify intent and to expound on tradition's long-held
misconceptions.
Ben Winter, particles physicist, Bible scholar, and author of "THE GREAT DECEPTION: Symbols
And Numbers Clarified," reveals there 'is' something new under the sun -- that is, for modern Bible
students. He addresses correctness of language and true intent of the major Bible topics: solves
Bible mysteries, defines Gog and Magog, reveals Daniel He-goat's surprising identity, and dares
to number the all important Ten Ages. Sign up for FREE book critiques at
http://www.Winterbriar.com and view more articles in blog format at blog.thegreatdeception.net.
Article Source:
http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Bennie_N_Winter

3. ==== ====
The Truth About The Last Days, Antichrist, The Rapture, More.
http://www.teachingfaith.com/content.cfm?id=304
==== ====