Project Title: PROJECT TITLE: Deployment of complete Open Source network infrastructure with equivalent provision for every necessary service provided in a typical Windows environment such as Active Directory, File and Printer Sharing, Firewalls, DNS, DHCP, Email Service, Web Service, FTP service, Chat Service, Certificate Services etc. Project Fundamentals: Please describe your IT project by answering these questions. Your answers need to address why this project is worth doing. PROBLEM DEFINITION (Your IT project should solve a well-defined problem): · What is the problem that you are addressing? · Who is the end user, and what is the end user profile? · What is the target market? · Who is the organization? PROPOSED IT SOLUTION (You should have a top-level idea of the solution or how you will solve the problem): · What is the significance of this project? · What is the proposed solution or approach? · How do you propose to complete your project (It is important to explain how you propose to complete your project)? · What tools and/or methodology (e.g. Network Diagram, IP Addressing, Security Technologies, Virtualization, Operating Systems, etc.) will be used to design, implement, and deliver the proposed solution? · What type of resources (e.g., software, hardware, virtualization techniques, etc.) will you need to complete your project? · Briefly describe the schedule of activities you will engage in to complete your project. · As appropriate, include a budget with projected expenses and their importance to the project. IMPACT ANALYSIS (Describe how the following issues impact your problem and its solution): · Organizational · Networking standards · Security · Ethical · Social · Legal · Economic · Target market/end user CAUTION: Students often consider the impact analysis as an afterthought and give little serious thought to this section. However, considering these issues is an integral part of designing an IT solution or system in the broader context. Designs and their implementations have failed for lack of consideration of such issues. REFLECTION ANALYSIS: · Why does this proposal qualify as a capstone project? · What technologies and methodologies does your capstone proposal incorporate that demonstrate your learning experience at Herzing? · Are there any new technologies that will be utilized? · How will your project further knowledge, understanding, or increase your skills in your discipline? Running head: MANAGED CARE MYTHS 1 MANAGED CARE MYTHS 6 Managed Care Myths Jessica Seifert Rasmussen College Feburary 25, 2018 Annotated Bibliography Cordina, J., Kumar, R., & Moss, C. (2015). Debunking common myths about healthcare consumerism. McKinsey & Company. Although true health consumerism is as yet developing graduall.

1. Project Title:
PROJECT TITLE: Deployment of complete Open Source
network infrastructure with equivalent provision for every
necessary service provided in a typical Windows environment
such as Active Directory, File and Printer Sharing, Firewalls,
DNS, DHCP, Email Service, Web Service, FTP service, Chat
Service, Certificate Services etc.
Project Fundamentals:
Please describe your IT project by answering these questions.
Your answers need to address why this project is worth doing.
PROBLEM DEFINITION (Your IT project should solve a well-
defined problem):
· What is the problem that you are addressing?
· Who is the end user, and what is the end user profile?
· What is the target market?
· Who is the organization?
PROPOSED IT SOLUTION (You should have a top-level idea
of the solution or how you will solve the problem):
· What is the significance of this project?
· What is the proposed solution or approach?
· How do you propose to complete your project (It is important
to explain how you propose to complete your project)?

2. · What tools and/or methodology (e.g. Network Diagram, IP
Addressing, Security Technologies, Virtualization, Operating
Systems, etc.) will be used to design, implement, and deliver
the proposed solution?
· What type of resources (e.g., software, hardware,
virtualization techniques, etc.) will you need to complete your
project?
· Briefly describe the schedule of activities you will engage in
to complete your project.
· As appropriate, include a budget with projected expenses and
their importance to the project.
IMPACT ANALYSIS (Describe how the following issues
impact your problem and its solution):
· Organizational
· Networking standards
· Security
· Ethical
· Social
· Legal
· Economic
· Target market/end user
CAUTION: Students often consider the impact analysis as an
afterthought and give little serious thought to this section.
However, considering these issues is an integral part of
designing an IT solution or system in the broader context.
Designs and their implementations have failed for lack of

3. consideration of such issues.
REFLECTION ANALYSIS:
· Why does this proposal qualify as a capstone project?
· What technologies and methodologies does your capstone
proposal incorporate that demonstrate your learning experience
at Herzing?
· Are there any new technologies that will be utilized?
· How will your project further knowledge, understanding, or
increase your skills in your discipline?
Running head: MANAGED CARE MYTHS
1
MANAGED CARE MYTHS
6
Managed Care Myths
Jessica Seifert
Rasmussen College
Feburary 25, 2018
Annotated Bibliography
Cordina, J., Kumar, R., & Moss, C. (2015). Debunking common
myths about healthcare consumerism. McKinsey & Company.
Although true health consumerism is as yet developing
gradually, there are pockets in which it has grabbed hold. For
instance, customers are starting to effectively take part in
settling on choices about their health and therapeutic services.
Likewise, purchaser inclinations are winding up more advanced.
Since the dispatch of general society protection trades, for
instance, a developing number of buyers have been choosing
their medical coverage gets ready for reasons other than cost

4. alone. Thus, this paper will discuss in details the Medicare
Advantage (MA) and how buy designs move as shoppers make
more complex exchange offs among in advance premiums, add
up to expenses, and system setups.
Both payors and suppliers could profit by more profoundly
captivating remedial services shoppers. More noteworthy
shopper engagement could enable them to enhance client
procurement and maintenance, reinforce mark premium, bring
down managerial expenses, and create upper hands. Maybe most
vital, upgraded buyer engagement can improve health results
In the United States, the continuous development of cost-
sharing levels has given purchasers more noteworthy impact on
healthcare conveyance. In the vicinity of 2006 and 2015, for
instance, the average deductible for representatives with
business supported protection developed by more than 120%.
Consumers now straightforwardly control $330 billion every
year in out-of-stash healing services expenses, and the decisions
they make can influence 61% of all healthcare spending.
To successfully manage purchasers, payors, and suppliers ought
to be set up to increase buyer mindfulness by giving them the
correct data at the ideal time at each stop along the customer
choice trip. In any case, controlling customers is more than just
making astounding data accessible; in this manner, the second
step in direction is to guarantee that buyers can undoubtedly
interface with the data they require. In spite of a few upgrades
in customers' mindfulness, most buyers are frequently still
oblivious to approaches to enhance their care. For instance,
numerous buyers are uninformed of the free or minimal effort
preventive health choices accessible to them.
Mintzberg, H. (2018). Managing the Myths of Healthcare. In
The Myths of Health Care (pp. 3-11). Springer, Cham.

5. Health care isn't slumping yet succeeding, lavishly, and we
would prefer not to pay for it. So the organizations, open and
private alike, mediate to cut expenses, and in this lies the
disappointment. In this, beyond any doubt, to-be-disputable
book, driving administration scholar Henry Mintzberg turns his
regard for reframing the management and organization of health
care.
The issue isn't management as such, yet a type of remote-
control command isolates from the tasks yet resolved to control
them. It revamps perseveringly, measures like frantic, advances
a chivalrous kind of authority, favors competition where the
need is for participation and imagines that the calling of
healthcare ought to get overseen like a business.
Management in health care ought to be about committed, what's
more, consistent care more than interventionist and long-winded
cures. This expert getting organized out is the source of
therapeutic services' incredible quality and also its weakening
shortcoming. In its organization, as in its activities, it sorts
whatever it can to apply traditional practices whose outcomes
can be estimated. At the point when the classes fit, this works
superbly well.
The doctor analyzes an infected appendix and works; some
director ticks the proper box and pays. In any case, what
happens when the fit comes up short, when patients fall outside
the classes or over a few classifications or should be dealt with
as individuals underneath the types or when the directors and
experts pass each other like ships in the night?
To adapt to this, Mintzberg says that we have to redesign our
heads rather than our organizations. He talks about how we can
contemplate frameworks and procedures, segments and scale,
estimation and administration, authority and organization,
competition and coordinated effort. "Market control of

6. healthcare is raunchy; state control is rough, proficient control
gets shut. We require each of the three in their place."
The general message of Mintzberg's astonishing analysis is that
care, cure, control, and group need to cooperate, in therapeutic
services organizations and crosswise over them, to convey
amount, quality, and balance at the same time.
Mintzberg, H. (2017). Dealing with the Myths of Health Care:
Bridging the Separations between Care, Cure, Control, and
Community. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Dealing with the Myths of Health Care Bridging the Separations
between Care, Cure, Control, and Community Health mind is in
urgent need of an update: its expenses have been ascending for
a considerable length of time far speedier than its outcomes. In
this, beyond any doubt to-be disputable book, driving
administration researcher and dissenter Henry Mintzberg turns
his regard for reframing the management and organization of
health care.
Mintzberg starts by depicting different myths of medicinal
services, prominently that this framework is coming up short.
It's not a framework, yet where it puts its exertion, it is
succeeding amazingly: we are living longer on account of the
numerous advances in medications. In any case, the present
framework is costly, and we would prefer not to pay for it. So
the overseers, in governments and insurance agencies alike,
have been interceding to settle it, for the most part by cutting
expenses.
What's more, here is the place to locate a decent plan of the
dissatisfaction. The issue isn't management in essence yet a type
of remote-control administration that has turned out to be
excessively pervasive. Isolated from the tasks yet resolved to
control them, it restorations tenaciously, measures like frantic,

7. advances a courageous type of authority, favors competition
where more participation is required and imagines that health
ought to get overseen like a business.
References
Cordina, J., Kumar, R., & Moss, C. (2015). Debunking common
myths about healthcare consumerism. McKinsey & Company.
Mintzberg, H. (2017). Dealing with the Myths of Health Care:
Bridging the Separations between Care, Cure, Control, and
Community. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Mintzberg, H. (2018). Managing the Myths of Healthcare. In
The Myths of Health Care (pp. 3-11). Springer, Cham.