This document provides forms for complainants and respondents related to discrimination complaints under the Equality Act 2010 in the UK. The complainant's questions form guides them to provide details about their protected characteristics, treatment experienced, and questions for the respondent. The respondent's answers form allows the respondent to respond to the complainant's description of events, state whether the treatment was unlawful, and answer their questions. Instructions are provided on how to complete the forms and serve them to the other party.
Health plus claim is a part of life insurance. Issuance of this form does not amount to admission of any liability under the claim on the part of the insurers.
Health plus claim is a part of life insurance. Issuance of this form does not amount to admission of any liability under the claim on the part of the insurers.
RTI dated 22-03-2020 against Supreme Court of IndiaOm Prakash Poddar
Opposite Parties in M.A. 583/2020 in W.P.(Criminal) are CORRUPT JUDGES, ADVOCATES and POLICE.
Biased Mentioning Officer of Supreme Court of India allowing Civil matters for listing during COVID 19 and Criminal matters are NOT CONSIDERED as URGENT MATTER
Department of Justice refused to intervene into the felony of Registry of Supreme Court of India on the ground of "it does not come under the purview of D/o Justice as per allocation of business. Judicial matters are required to be taken up in the Court of Law"
RTI dated 31-07-2020 against Supreme Court of IndiaOm Prakash Poddar
Registration and de-registration of Fundamental Right case after 1 year by Supreme Court of India wherein one petitioner has succumbed to suspicious death under illegal lock up since 2011 another one is the next target of corrupt law enforcement agencies.
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018Om Prakash Poddar
Finally Department of Justice forwarded the complaint against felony of Registry of Supreme Court of India (which PMO had forwarded to DOJ) to Secretary General of Supreme Court of India.
Dear Sir/Madam
Further to my letter dated 25th Feb 14.
The issuing of the amended judgment constitutes an error in law.
The basis is: please refer to the attached judgment CSIB 331 2009.doc
and The rules of procedure “Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007” below
Part 10 Review of decision of Upper Tribunal
(1) The Upper Tribunal may review a decision made by it on a matter in a case, other than a decision that is an excluded decision for the purposes of section 13(1) (but see subsection (7)).
(2) The Upper Tribunal's power under subsection (1) in relation to a decision is exercisable—
(a) of its own initiative, or
(b) on application by a person who for the purposes of section 13(2) has a right of appeal in respect of the decision.
(4) Where the Upper Tribunal has under subsection (1) reviewed a decision, the Upper Tribunal may in the light of the review do any of the following—
(a) correct accidental errors in the decision or in a record of the decision;
(b) amend reasons given for the decision;
(c) set the decision aside.
Under rule 10 (4) correction may only be made after a review of the decision the amended judgment is therefore invalid.
Yours Faithfully
Douglas
Disabled People’s User-Led Organisations (DPULOs) play a significant role in promoting the role and value of disabled people in their local community. The Strengthening DPULOs Programme was launched in July 2011 to provide a range of practical and financial support to DPULOs to support them to be strong and sustainable.
I am recruiting additional Ambassadors to further extend the Strengthening DPULOs Programme.
For further information, please visit: http://odi.dwp.gov.uk/odi-projects/user-led-organisations/ambassadors-application.php
RTI dated 22-03-2020 against Supreme Court of IndiaOm Prakash Poddar
Opposite Parties in M.A. 583/2020 in W.P.(Criminal) are CORRUPT JUDGES, ADVOCATES and POLICE.
Biased Mentioning Officer of Supreme Court of India allowing Civil matters for listing during COVID 19 and Criminal matters are NOT CONSIDERED as URGENT MATTER
Department of Justice refused to intervene into the felony of Registry of Supreme Court of India on the ground of "it does not come under the purview of D/o Justice as per allocation of business. Judicial matters are required to be taken up in the Court of Law"
RTI dated 31-07-2020 against Supreme Court of IndiaOm Prakash Poddar
Registration and de-registration of Fundamental Right case after 1 year by Supreme Court of India wherein one petitioner has succumbed to suspicious death under illegal lock up since 2011 another one is the next target of corrupt law enforcement agencies.
Final status of PMOPG/ E/2018/0480386 dated 09.10.2018Om Prakash Poddar
Finally Department of Justice forwarded the complaint against felony of Registry of Supreme Court of India (which PMO had forwarded to DOJ) to Secretary General of Supreme Court of India.
Dear Sir/Madam
Further to my letter dated 25th Feb 14.
The issuing of the amended judgment constitutes an error in law.
The basis is: please refer to the attached judgment CSIB 331 2009.doc
and The rules of procedure “Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007” below
Part 10 Review of decision of Upper Tribunal
(1) The Upper Tribunal may review a decision made by it on a matter in a case, other than a decision that is an excluded decision for the purposes of section 13(1) (but see subsection (7)).
(2) The Upper Tribunal's power under subsection (1) in relation to a decision is exercisable—
(a) of its own initiative, or
(b) on application by a person who for the purposes of section 13(2) has a right of appeal in respect of the decision.
(4) Where the Upper Tribunal has under subsection (1) reviewed a decision, the Upper Tribunal may in the light of the review do any of the following—
(a) correct accidental errors in the decision or in a record of the decision;
(b) amend reasons given for the decision;
(c) set the decision aside.
Under rule 10 (4) correction may only be made after a review of the decision the amended judgment is therefore invalid.
Yours Faithfully
Douglas
Disabled People’s User-Led Organisations (DPULOs) play a significant role in promoting the role and value of disabled people in their local community. The Strengthening DPULOs Programme was launched in July 2011 to provide a range of practical and financial support to DPULOs to support them to be strong and sustainable.
I am recruiting additional Ambassadors to further extend the Strengthening DPULOs Programme.
For further information, please visit: http://odi.dwp.gov.uk/odi-projects/user-led-organisations/ambassadors-application.php
A checklist for litigants bringing or defending IP actions in the Small Claims Track of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court.
This article covers the court's jurisdiction, its rules and practice, pleadings, disclosure and remedies
This article supplements IPEC Small claims Track Guide, CPR Parts 27 and 63 and the Part 27A and Part 63 Practice Directions.
Life insurance is a contract between you and the life insurance company (the insurer), which provides you (the assured) or your beneficiary for whose benefit the policy is taken with a pre-determined amount on the happening of a particular event contingent on the duration of human life
Health plus claim intimation form is for Health Insurance Policies (HCB & MSB Claims).Form must be completed & signed by Policy Holder / Principal Insured only and submitted to the TPA.
Companies chosen are Google, Pay-pal, & AmazonSeveral compani.docxdonnajames55
Companies chosen are: Google, Pay-pal, & Amazon
Several companies use their brand as a competitive advantage. Given your knowledge about the global economy, identify three brands you believe have the strongest likelihood of remaining a source of advantage in the 21st Century and explain why. Explain the effects you believe the Internet’s capabilities will have on the brands you identified in the previous discussion and what the owner of the brand should do in light of them.
Choose one of the companies above, analyze the internal environment of the company you researched to determine that company’s strengths and weaknesses. Based on the strengths and weaknesses you discovered, determine what steps the company could take to positively impact the company’s competitiveness. Explain your rationale.
Unit I Lesson Notes:
Employer-Employee Relationship
The traditional employer-employee relationship is described as employment-at-will, which simply means that the relationship exists as long as both the employer and the employee want it to exist. That is, employment at-will means that an employee can resign whenever he or she wants to resign for any reason or for no reason. It is often said that an employee must give notice to an employer before the employee resigns, but that idea arises out of the employee hoping for a positive reference from the employer not a legal requirement. Employment-at-will also means that an employer can discharge an employee at any time and for any reason or for no reason, as long as the discharge does not constitute discrimination under federal or state law.
This traditional employment relationship is sometimes modified by employment contracts. Employment contracts are governed by the rules that apply to contracts in general. An employment contract is based on an agreement between the employer and the employee and states express consideration (i.e., the employee promises to work for the employer for a specified period, and the employer agrees to pay the employee a specified amount of compensation). It must be made between parties that have the legal capacity to enter into a contract and be for a legal purpose. Employees hired with a contract can only be terminated according to the provisions of the contract. Conversely, employees hired under the at-will doctrine can have their employment terminated at any time and for any legal reason by either the employer or the employee. As with any other contract, the breach of an employment contract entitles the non-breaching party to recover damages that arise because of the breach of the contract.
An employee who is fired in violation of an employment contract can recover any compensation due under the contract that has not been paid. For an employer, that means an employee who quits in violation of an employment contract may have to pay the costs of finding, hiring, and training a replacement. They may even have to pay back some of the compensation that has already been .
Application to the Upper Tribunal for permission to appeal (the First-tier Tribunal refused permission). Concerns requests for information made to Humberside police to obtain the number of times the phrase "YOU CANT MAKE ME" appeared in police officers witness statements. Humberside Police relied on section 14(1) (vexatious requests) of FOIA.
Dear Sir
Thank you for your letter of today.
I sent that message to you in error and I apologise.
As you have said previously you cannot intervene, I believed that correspondence between us was at an end.
To call me vexatious and ask for my private letters for seeking the truth to be deleted, after I have committed a protected act, as far as I am concerned are detrimental, bullying and therefore victimisation.
I refer you to the attached document judicial conduct 2013
As I have stated an employment Judge said I should never have lost my case.
My difficulties lie in the document ANNEX 1 the Bristol ET got it wrong and the wrong needs to be corrected.
Yours Sincerely
Douglas
Dear Judge Parkin
I thank you for your letter of today and for taking the time to review my document annex 1.
You are not entirely correct when you say “I recognise that you feel dissatisfied with the original judgment”
The truth is I am mostly dissatisfied by the reasons as per my document annex 1.
I am an ordinary individual who believes in truth and honesty, not a Lawyer or Judge with prerogatives which can be easily abused.
Judge Hand admits the Tribunal accepted the respondents version of events and you agree.
He fails to mention they made up facts to suit.
However what Judge Hand says is irrelevant to my requests, the Bristol ET got important facts wrong.
The principle of finality in this case relies on corruption of the truth, bullying; this cannot be allowed.
I would like the truth recorded in the reasons for posterity not a fabrication of false facts.
I seek satisfaction, for these reasons I will continue to write to whoever I wish, including you.
Please note my new address for posting letters is as my e-mail of 03/02/2015.
Thank you again.
Douglas.
SYSTEMATIC LEAGAL BULLYING!
The Tribunal may well have reached the right outcome.
But, there is no doubt, that their decision was based upon the wrong story and incorrect factual conclusions.
Is this not bias?....it is certainly not fair.
In contravention of the bangalore principles
Prohibited conduct-questionnaire-signed to Judge Elias
1. 1
The Equality Act 2010 – Discrimination and Other Prohibited
Conduct
Questions and Answers Forms
These forms are in two parts;
Part 1: The complainant’s questions (a questions form to be completed by the
person with a discrimination or other prohibited conduct complaint)
Part 2: The respondent’s answers (an answers form to be completed by the
person/organisation the questions form is sent to)
There is accompanying guidance to the forms, called, The Equality Act 2010: Obtaining
Information – Discrimination and Other Prohibited Conduct – Guidance which can be
found on the Government Equalities Office (GEO) website
www.equalities.gov.uk/news/equality_act_2010_forms_for_ob.aspx
These forms are to help someone obtain information under section 138 of the Equality
Act 2010.
The questions form is for completion by someone who thinks they have been treated
unlawfully under the Act (“the complainant”) to help them get information from the
person or organisation (the "respondent") he or she feels has discriminated against
harassed or victimised him or her. The answers form is for completion by the respondent
to reply to the complainant’s questions.
The Equality Act 2010 makes it unlawful to discriminate against someone because of
their age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and
maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation. It applies to work and
(apart from in the case of age and marriage and civil partnership) to the provision of
services, exercise of public functions, managing or letting premises, in education, in
associations and private clubs.
There are separate questions and answers forms and supplementary guidance for
equality of terms complaints (which used to be called an equal pay complaint) which are
also on the GEO website
www.equalities.gov.uk/news/equality_act_2010_forms_for_ob.aspx
2. 2
Part 1: Complainant’s questions form
• Part 1 is a questions form to be completed by the person with a discrimination or
other prohibited conduct complaint.
• Please read the instructions in this form and Parts 1 and 2 of the
supplementary guidance The Equality Act 2010: Obtaining Information –
Discrimination and Other Prohibited Conduct – Guidance before completing
this form. You may find it helpful to prepare what you want to say on a separate
piece of paper.
• If you do not have enough space on the form then continue on an additional separate
paper which should be attached to the form and sent to the respondent.
Section 1: This section is about the respondent (the person or organisation you
think may have acted unlawfully against you and want to ask questions of)
1. Enter the name of the person to be
questioned (the respondent)
To LORD Justice Elias
Enter the respondent’s address of Court of Appeal
Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, City of
Westminster, London, UK
Section 2: This section is about you (the complainant)
2. Enter your name
(you are the complainant)
I Douglas Iain Gardiner
Enter your address of 1 Place St Jean Lot 10
Chateau Gontier
53200 France
3. 3
Section 3: This section is about the protected characteristic/s you (the
complainant) have a dispute about
Please tick the appropriate box or boxes
to indicate what protected characteristic
you think your complaint relates to. A
court or tribunal can consider complaints
relating to more than one protected
characteristic in the same case and you
may tick more than one box if you think
this applies to you.
Before you complete this section you may
wish to read paragraph 2 of Part 2 of the
supplementary guidance and you may
want to seek professional advice to help
complete this part of the form.
All of these terms are defined in the
Equality and Human Rights
Commission’s guidance and Codes of
Practice which you can get from
www.equalityhumanrights.com
Age
Disability
Gender reassignment
Marriage and civil partnership
Pregnancy and maternity
Race
Religion or belief
Sex
Sexual orientation
Section 4: This section is about the treatment which you (the complainant)
thinks may have been unlawful
If you are able to, please tick the
appropriate box or boxes to indicate what
type of unlawful treatment you think you
may have experienced. You may tick
more than one box.
Before you complete this section you may
wish to read paragraphs 3 – 4 of Part 2 of
the supplementary guidance and you
may want to seek professional advice to
help complete this part of the form.
Direct discrimination
Indirect discrimination
Victimisation
Harassment
Discrimination arising from disability
Failure to make reasonable
adjustments (for disability only)
4. 4
Section 5: This section is about when the respondent might be responsible
for what other people do
(If applicable) I think that you instructed, caused or induced or aided another person to
treat me in a way which is unlawful under the Act as set out in section 3 and 4 above.
Before you complete this section you may wish to read paragraph 5 of Part 2 the
supplementary guidance.
(Please continue on a separate sheet of paper if you run out of space here)
I note that the court of appeal are refusing to process my communications and therefore
denying me access to Justice.
due too
1) The ill-founded Judgement 1400500/2011 issued by the employment tribunal of
Bristol dated 17/10/2011
2) A lack of resource at the Court of Appeal
3) Your Judgment that the claims of the appellant are totally without merit, out of time
and the domestic appellate process has been exhausted.
4) I disagree with these findings and attach a review of the Judgment 1400500.
5) It must be noted that contrary to all of the judgments of an independent judiciary the
DWP has identified the occurrence of the 09/12/10 as an industrial accident in which the
claimant suffered personal injury, for which the claimant is in receipt of compensation.
6) All of the claims fall within the three year limit for personal injury.
5. 5
Section 6: This section is about what happened
Please give a brief factual description of the treatment, or the failure to make a
reasonable adjustment to which your complaint relates and the circumstances leading
up to that treatment or failure. You should give key factual details, such as the date,
time, place and number of instances of the treatment or failure you are complaining
about.
You should bear in mind that in section 8 of the questions form you will be asking
whether the respondent agrees with what you say in this section.
(Please continue on a separate sheet of paper if you run out of space here)
The time limits imposed are beyond the capabilities of a mentally disturbed person.
The rules imposed are beyond the capabilities and understanding of the appellant
All of the claims are well documented in correspondance with courts in the cases as
listed
Bristol ET 1400500/2011, 1401745/2012, 1401756/2012
1401811/2012, 1401812/2012, 4109312/2012
EAT UKEATPA/1798/11/JOJ, UKEATPA/0386/13/LA
Court of Appeal A2 2012/2751 A2 2012/2752
& other related correspondance.
I consider that this treatment may have been unlawful.
6. 6
Section 7: This section lets you (the complainant) say why you think the
treatment you experienced was unlawful
Please give the reasons why you think the treatment that you experienced was unlawful.
Before you complete this section you may wish read paragraphs 6 – 8 of Part 2 of the
supplementary guidance.
Please continue on a separate sheet of paper if you run out of space here.
I note that you are refusing to process my communications and therefore denying
access to Justice.
due too
1) The ill-founded Judgement 1400500/2011 issued by the employment tribunal of
Bristol dated 17/10/2011
2) A lack of resource
3)Your judgment that the claims of the appellant are totally without merit, out of time and
the domestic appellate process has been exhausted.
4) I disagree with these findings and attach a review of the Judgment 1400500.
5) It must be noted that contrary to all of the judgments of an independent judiciary the
DWP has identified the occurrence of the 09/12/10 as an industrial accident in which the
claimant suffered personal injury, for which the claimant is in receipt of compensation.
6) All of the claims fall within the three year limit for personal injury.
7) The concerns are all listed in aformentioned correspondance.
7. 7
MY QUESTIONS
Section 8: In this section you should set out your questions to the
respondent
Section 8 provides you (the complainant) with the opportunity to ask any other relevant
questions you think may be important.
Please note there is a separate answers form which a respondent can use to answer
these questions
Before you complete this section you
may wish read paragraphs 9 – 14 of
Part 2 of the supplementary
guidance.
Please list and number the questions
you would like to ask the respondent.
We have included two standard
questions here.
Question 1: Do you (the respondent)
agree that the statement in section 6
above is an accurate description of what
happened? If not, in what respect do you
disagree or what is your version of what
happened?
Question 2: Do you (the respondent)
accept that your treatment of me was
unlawful as I have set out in section 7 If
not, why not? Why was I treated in the
way I was?
Question 3:
8. 8
Section 9: This section is about finalising your questions form
Please send your answers to the
following address if different from my
home address
Address (if appropriate)
Insert the address you want the
answers to be sent to if different
from your home address in
section 2.
This form must be signed and
dated. If it is to be signed on
behalf of (rather than by) the
complainant, the person signing
should:
• describe himself/herself e.g.
‘solicitor acting for (name of
complainant)’; and
• give their name and business
address (or home address, if
appropriate).
Signed
Date 13/11/2013
The respondent does not have to answer your questions. But by virtue of section
138 of the Equality Act 2010, these questions and any answers are admissible as
evidence in proceedings under the Act and a court or tribunal may draw an
inference from a failure to reply within 8 weeks or from evasive or equivocal
answer.
9. 9
How to serve the questions
• We strongly advise you to keep a copy of the completed form in a safe place.
• Send the respondent your completed questions form and a blank answers forms (i.e.
whole of this document) either to their usual last known residence or place of business
or, if you know they are acting through a solicitor, to that address.
• You can either deliver the documents in person or send them by post, fax or e-mail. If
you decide to send by post you are advised to use first class post. Alternatively, you
can use the recorded delivery service, so that, if necessary, you can produce evidence
that they were delivered.
• If you decide to send the documents by email or fax you are advised to do what you
can to ensure the documents are delivered, for example, requesting a “read” receipt on
emails or checking the fax delivery status.
• Whatever method you choose to send them, you should make clear that the forms may
require action.
• Please read paragraphs 15 – 17 of Part 2 of the supplementary guidance for further
information about serving the documents.
10. 10
Part 2: Respondent’s answers form
• Part 2 is an answers form to be completed by the respondent.
• Please read the instructions in this form and Parts 1 and 3 of the
supplementary guidance The Equality Act 2010: Obtaining Information –
Discrimination and Other Prohibited Conduct – Guidance before completing
the answers. You may wish to prepare what you want to say on a separate piece of
paper.
• If you do not have enough space on the answers form for what you want to say,
continue on an additional piece of paper which should be attached to the answers
form and sent to the complainant.
Section 1: This section is about the complainant
1. Enter the name of the
questioner (the complainant)
To
Enter the complainant’s
address
of
Section 2: This section is about you (the respondent)
2. Enter your name (you are
the respondent)
I
Enter your organisation’s
name and address
of
acknowledge receipt
of the questions form
signed by you and
dated
which was served on
me on (date)
11. 11
Section 3: This section is about what happened
Please indicate whether you agree or
disagree that the complainant’s
statement in section 6 of the
questions form is an accurate
description of what happened and tick
the appropriate box.
Please tick the appropriate box
*delete as required.
I agree
with the statement in full or in part *
I disagree
with the statement in full or in part*
If you agree with the statement only
in part or you do not agree with the
statement in full or in part please say
why.
If appropriate, include your own
version of what happened.
Before you complete this section you
may wish to read paragraphs 3 – 4 of
Part 3 of the supplementary guidance.
I do not agree that the statement is an
accurate description of what happened for
the following reason(s).
12. 12
Section 4: This section is about whether the treatment was unlawful
Please indicate whether you agree or
disagree that the treatment or failure
experienced by the complainant as
set out in section 7 of the questions
form was unlawful.
Please tick the appropriate box
*delete as required.
I agree
with the statement in full or in part*
I disagree
with the statement in full or in part*
If you do not agree that treatment
complained of by the claimant was
unlawful please say why.
Include any reasons which in your
view explain or justify the treatment
experienced by the complainant.
Before you complete this section you
may wish to read paragraphs 5 – 9 of
Part 3 of the supplementary
guidance.
I do not agree that the treatment complained
of was unlawful for the following reason(s).
13. 13
Section 5: In this section you should give answers to the other questions
the complainant has asked
Please include here the answers to
the other questions the
complainant has asked in section 8
of the questions form.
Before you complete this section
you may wish to read paragraphs
10 – 14 of Part 3 of the
supplementary guidance.
14. 14
Section 6: In this section you should indicate which questions you are not
answering and why
You do not have to complete this
section if you have answered all
the questions in the complainant’s
questions form
I have not answered the questions identified in
the box below because I am
unable
unwilling
to do so for the reasons given.
But, if you are unable or unwilling
to answer some or all of the
questions, please tick the
appropriate box, identify the
unanswered questions and give
your reasons for not answering
them.
Before you complete this section
you may wish to read paragraph 2
and paragraphs 12 – 14 of Part 3
of the supplementary guidance.
Section 7: This section is about finalising your answers form
The answers form must be signed
and dated. If it is to be signed on
behalf of (rather than by) the
respondent, the person signing
should:
Signed
Date
• describe himself/herself e.g.
‘solicitor acting for (name of
employer)’ or ‘personnel
manager of (name of firm,
government department etc)’;
and
• give their name and business
address (or home address if
appropriate).
Name/description
Address (if appropriate)
15. 15
Please note:
You (the respondent) do not have to answer the complainant’s questions. However,
if you do not answer within 8 weeks, or answer in an evasive or equivocal way a
court or tribunal may draw an inference from this.
How to serve the answers form on the complainant
• If you wish to reply to the question form, you should do so within 8 weeks.
• You should retain, and keep in a safe place, the questions sent to you and a copy of
your reply.
• You can serve the answers form either by delivering it in person to the complainant or
by sending it by post.
• If you decide to send by post you are advised to use first class post. Alternatively,
you can use the recorded delivery service, so that, if necessary, you can produce
evidence that the answers were delivered.
• You should send the answers form to the address indicated in section 9 of the
complainant’s question form.
• If you decide to send the documents by email or fax you are advised to do what you
can to ensure the documents are delivered, for example, requesting a “read” receipt
on emails or checking the fax delivery status.
• Please read paragraphs 15 – 16 of Part 3 of the supplementary guidance for further
information about serving the documents.