SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Date : 
Client : 
Subject : 
Project ID SD - KIOSK-MYNLD 
ANGEL LA ZA RO & A SSOCIA TES INTERNA TIONA L Cal'c by A.H. Sinconiegue 
(Consulting Engineer & Architects) Date Jul-21-2014 
Checked by Rhonda Divina A. Rapirap 
MAYNILAD Aprroved by Angel Lazaro III. Ph.D 
Analysis & Design of Basement Wall Nomenclature Date 
PROPOSED FOOD KIOSK 
SURCHARGE 
d5 
d6 
t 
BASEMENT Seismic Pressure Diag. Surcharge Diag. Soil Pressure Diag. WALL SECTION 
Jul-21-2014 
Jul-21-2014 
Jul-21-2014 Date 
PAE 
d7 
A 
B 
RB 
d1 
d2 
d3 
Psoil 
Psur 
W1 
W2 
W3 
L 
h 
d4 
HEEL TOE 
h1 
H 
Analysis and Design Refferences : 
Fig. A - BASEMENT WALL NOMENCLATURE 
1.0 National Structural Code of The Philippines (NSCP) 2010, Volume 1 , 6th Edition for Building, Towers 
and other Vertical Srtuctures 
by : Association of Structural Engineers in the Philippines. ( ASEP) 
2.0 National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP) 1997, Volumn 2, 2ND Edition, Bridges 
ASD(Allowable Stress Design) 
by: Association of Structural Engineers in the Philippines. ( ASEP) 
3.0 AASHTO Bridge Design and Specification 2002-2010 
by: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) 
4.0 Design of Reinforced Concrete ACI 318-05 Code Edition, Seventh Edition 
by: Jack C. McCormac & James K. Nelson 
Spreadsheet Condition 
This spreadsheet is applicable only on non- slopping backfill and the use of this spreadsheet is only 
for structure having the same configuration. 
Wall Dimensions : Design Notes: 
Total height of retaining wall, H mm - Neglect Soil Passive Pressure for Critical Design of Stem - NSCP 5.5.2 
Height of the soil at the back of the wall, h1 mm 
Height of the soil at the exposed face of the wall, h2 mm - Wall Inertia Effects not considered - NSCP 5.6.4 
Stem thickness, t mm 
Total length of footing, L mm - Overall Stability with Earthquake Force (Seed & Whitman) - AASHTO 5.8.9.1 
Footing thickness, h mm 
Surcharge Height, Sh = mm - Factor of Safety in Sliding and Overturning are Reduced to 75% of Original 
Value at Earthquake Condition - AASHTO 5.8.9.1A 
- Wall analyzed as Propped Beam. 
3300 
3300 
1200 
250 
1600 
400 
150
Date : 
Client : 
Subject : 
Project ID SD - KIOSK-MYNLD 
REFERENCE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CALCULATION REMARKS 
A. WALL PARAMETERS 
Total height of retaining wall, H mm 
Height of the soil at the back of the wall, h1 mm 
Height of the soil at the exposed face of the wall, h2 mm 
Stem thickness, t mm 
Total length of footing, L mm 
Footing thickness, h mm 
Surcharge Height, Sh = mm 
B. CONCRETE PARAMETERS 
3300 
3300 
1200 
250 
1600 
400 
150 
Compressive strength @ 28 days, f'c Mpa 
Modulus of Elasticity, Ec = 4700√f'c Mpa 
Unit weight (normal concrete), γc KN/m3 
C. STEEL PARAMETERS 
28 
24870.06 
24 
276 
MPa (Grade 40) for 12mm and smaller Ø bars , fy Mpa 
(to be used for temp. and shrinkage bars) 
MPa (Grade 60) for larger Ø bars (>12mm) , fy 414 
Mpa 
(to be used for main and shear bars) 
Modulus of Elasticity, Es Mpa 
Main Horizontal bar size at exposed side, Øhe mm 
MainVertical bar size at exposed side, Øve mm 
Main Horizontal bar size at rear, Øhr mm 
Main Vertical bar size at rear, Øvr mm 
Main Reinforcement bar size at heel, Øh mm 
Main Reinforcement bar size at toe, Øt mm 
Temperature bar size, Øtb mm 
Stirrup bar size, Øs mm 
NSCP II-Sec. 8.7.1 
NSCP II-Sec.8.7.2 
ANGEL LA ZA RO & A SSOCIA TES INTERNA TIONA L 
(Consulting Engineer & Architects) 
Jul-21-2014 
MAYNILAD 
Analysis & Design of Basement Wall Nomenclature 
A.H. Sinconiegue 
Jul-21-2014 
Rhonda Divina A. Rapirap 
Jul-21-2014 
Angel Lazaro III. Ph.D 
Jul-21-2014 
Cal'c by 
Date 
Checked by 
Date 
Aprroved by 
Date 
200000 
10 
10 
10 
12 
12 
12 
10 
12 
D. SOIL PARAMETERS 
Unit Weight of Soil, ɣs KN/m3 
Allowable Bearing Capacity on Site, qall kPa 
Surcharge, S kPa 
Factor of Saefty against Overturning, FSOT 
Factor of Saefty against Sliding, FSSL 
Angle of Internal friction of soil, φ ° 
Backfill Slope angle, β ° 
E. Seismic Parameter 
2.7 
2 
1.5 
30 
0.00 
Importance Factor, I 
Acceleration factor, A 
Horizontal Acceleration Coefficient, 0.50*A = kh 
Vertical Acceleration Coefficient, kv 
Check Horizontal Acceleration, (1-kv)*TAN(φ-β) 
Arc tan(kh/(1-kv)) = θ ° 
F. Miscellaneous Parameters 
1 
0.40 
0.2 
0.00 
0.46 
Consider 1.0 meter strip , b mm 
Minimum Concrete Cover, Cc mm 
Flexural strength reduction factor, φf 
Shear strength reduction factor, φs 
Compressive block depth reduction factor, β 1 
Normal weight concrete modification factor, λ 
Coefficient of Friction, μ = 
G. Design Calculation 
1000 
75 
0.9 
0.75 
1.0 
0.5 
Calculation for coefficient of active pressure, ka = (1-sinɸ)/(1+sinɸ) 
Consider 1.0 meter strip, b = mm 
Calculation for active soil force, Psoil = 1/2*ɣs*(h1-h)^2*ka KN 
Calculation surcharge force, Psur = (S/ɣs)*(ɣs)*(h1-T)Ka KN 
Calculation for negative unfactored moment @ base, Mnneg 
Mnneg = Psoil*(h1-h)/7.5 + Psur*(h1-h)/8 KN.m 
Calculation for negative factored moment @ base, Muneg = 1.6*Mn KN.m 
Convert resultant force into a uniform load 
For soil force, w1 = 2*Psoil/(h1-h) KN/m 
For surcharge force, w2 = Psur/(h1-h) KN/m 
Effective length, leff = (h1 - h) mm 
Summation of moment about point B, Ra = Mn/leff + (w1*leff)/3 + (w2*leff)/3 KN 
Summation of moment about point A, RB = (w1*leff)/6 + (w2*leff)/2 - Mn/leff KN 
Calculation for dist where max moment occur @ shear is zero, x 
NSCP II-Sec.5.5.5 
NSCP II-Sec.5.5.5 
NSCP II-App. (H-9) 
NSCP II-App. (H-8) 
NSCP I-Sec.407.8.3.1 
NSCP I-Sec.409.4.2.1 
NSCP I-Sec.409.4.2.3 
NSCP I-Sec.410.3.7.3 
NSCP I-Sec.411.3.1.1 
18 
150 
11.31 
0.85 
0.33 
1000 
25.23 
7.569 
12.499 
19.999 
17.4 
2.61 
2900 
24.915 
7.884 
- x - x2 
7.884 2.61 3 = 0 by trial and error , x = 1243.46 mm Derived from shear diag.
Calculation for max positive unfactore moment, Mnpos 
Mnpos = RB*x - w1*x^3/6*leff - w2*x^2/2 KN.m 
Calculation for factore positve moment, Mupos = 1.6*Mnpos 9.382 
KN.m 
Check if assumed stem thickness is adequate to carry induced load by soil 
Calculation for effective thickness, teff = t - cc - Øvr/2 169.00 
mm 
Coefficient of Resistance, Rn = Mu/ɸf*b*teff 
2 MPa 
Check for rho min , sqrt(fc')/4*fy 
Rho min should not be less than with, 1.4/fy 
Therefore adopt rho min, ρmin = 
Calculation for rho theoritical, ρ = 0.85*fc'/fy ( 1 - sqrt( 1 - 2*Rn/0.85*fc')) 
Calculate for rho balnce, ρb = 0.85*fc'*β1*600 / fy*(600 + fy) 
Calculate for rho max, ρmax = 0.75*ρb 
Not Aplicable 
0.78 
0.0032 
0.0034 
Therefor adopt design rho, ρdes = 
Calculation for mechanical ratio, ω = ρdes*fy/fc' 
0.0500 
Check for the req'd thickness of the stem, treq'd = sqrt(Muneg/(ɸf*fc'*b*ω*(1-0.59*ω)) mm 
Vertical Reinforcement Design @ the rear face of the wall : 
2 
Calculate for minimum vertical steel area, Avmin = 0.0015*b*t mm2 
Calcualtion for the total vert. steel area required, Avreq'd = ρdes*b*teff 571.50 
mm2 
Check for actual vertical steel area required, Aactual mm2 
Calculation for provide main steel area, AØvr = PI()*(Øvr)2/4 113.10 
mmCalculation for total number bars, N = Aactual/Aøvr 6.0 
pcs 
Calculation for Spacing, Svr , b/N 160.00 
mm 
Check vert spacing, 3*t mm 
450 mm 
Therefore adopt actual spacing, Sactual mm 
Therefore use : 6- φ12mm vertical main bars spaced @ 160mm O.C 
Check for Shear adequacy of wall: 
Calculation for factored shear force, Vu =1.6( MAX( RA & RB)) 39.863 
KN 
Nominal Shear provided by concrete, Vc = 0.17*λ*SQRT(fc')*b*teff 152.025 
KN 
Calculation for factored shear provided by concrete, ɸsVc 114.019 
KN 
Check Vu if < 0.5*ɸsVc KN 
Check for development length on bottom of wall footing: 
Calculate for, ldc = 0.24*fy*Øvr/λ*SQRT(fc') 226 
mm 
NSCP I-Sec.410.6.1 
NSCP I-Sec.410.6.1 
NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 
NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 
NSCP I-Sec.411.4.1.1 
NSCP I-Sec.411.2 
NSCP I-Sec.411.6.6.1 
NSCP I-Sec.412.4.2 
Derived from moment diag. 
Non-compliant 
Compliant 
Per meter strip 
5.863 
127.89 
Therefore, Assumed thickness is satisfactory 
Stem thickness is adequate to carry shear stresses 
375 
571.50 
750.00 
450.00 
160.00 
57.009 
NSCP I-Sec.414.4.2 
Use rho minimum for design 
0.0034 
0.0019 
N.A 
N.A 
0.0034 
214 
Calculate for, ldc = 0.043*fy*Øvr mm 
Therefore adopt maximum value above, ldc 226 
mm 
Check for minumum, ldcmm 200 
mm 
Therefore adopt for actual development length, ldcact 226 
mm 
Horizontal Reinforcement Design @ the rear face of the wall: 
2 
Calculate main steel area provided, Aøhr = PI()*(Øhr)2/4 78.540 
mm2 
Calculate for total hor. steel area req'd, Ahreq'd = 0.0025*(h1-h)*t 1812.5 
mmCalculation for total number of main bar, N = Ahreq'd / Aøhr 24 
pcs 
Calculation for horizontal spacing, Shr = (h1-h)/N mm 
Check hor. spacing : 3*t mm 
120 
750 
450 
120 
450 mm 
Therefore adopt actual spacing, Sactual = mm 
Therefore use : 24-Ø10mm horizontal main bar spaced @120mmO.C 
Vertical Main Reinforcement Design @ the exposed face of the wall: 
Coefficient of resistance, Rn = Mupos/ɸf*b*teff 
2 MPa 
Check for rho min , sqrt(fc')/4*fy 
Rho min should not be less than with, 1.4/fy 
Therefore adopt rho min, ρmin = 
Calculation for rho theoritical, ρ = 0.85*fc'/fy ( 1 - sqrt( 1 - 2*Rn/0.85*fc')) 
Calculate for rho balnce, ρb = 0.85*fc'*β1*600 / fy*(600 + fy) 
Calculate for rho max, ρmax = 0.75*ρb 
N.A 
N.A 
Therefor adopt design rho, ρdes = 
0.0034 
Vertical Reinforcement Design @ the exposed face of the wall : 
2 
Calculate for minimum vertical steel area, Avmin = 0.0015*b*t 375 
mm2 
Calcualtion for the total vert. steel area required, Avreq'd = ρdes*b*teff 571.50 
mm2 
Check for actual vertical steel area required, Aactual 571.50 
mm2 
Calculation for provide main steel area, AØve = PI()*(Øve)2/4 78.54 
mmCalculation for total number bars, N = Aactual/Aøve pcs 
Calculation for Spacing, Sve , b/N mm 
Check vert. spacing, 3*t mm 
120 
750 
450 
450 mm 
Therefore adopt actual spacing, Sactual 120 
mm 
Therefore use: 8 - Ø10mm vertical main bar spaced @ 120mm O.C 
Horizontal Reinforcement Design @ the exposed face of the wall: 
2 
Calculate main steel area provided, Aøhe = PI()*(Øhe)2/4 mm2 
Calculate for total hor. steel area req'd, Ahreq'd = 0.0025*(h1-h)*t mmCalculation for total number of main bar, N = Ahreq'd / Aøhe pcs 
Calculation for horizontal spacing, Shr = (h1-h)/N mm 
Check hor. spacing : 3*t mm 
450 mm 
Therefore adopt actual spacing, S = mm 
NSCP I-Sec.412.4.2 
NSCP I-Sec.412.4.1 
NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.3 
NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 
NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 
NSCP I-Sec.410.6.1 
NSCP I-Sec.410.6.1 
NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.2 
Compliant 
Full Height of Wall 
Non-compliant 
Use rho minimum for design 
Not Aplicable 
0.365 
0.0032 
0.0034 
0.0034 
0.0009 
78.540 
1812.5 
24 
120 
750 
450 
120 
NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 
NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 
NSCP I-Sec.414.4.3 
NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 
NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 
8.0 
Full Height of Wall 
Sactual Therefore use: 24 - Ø10mm horizontal main bar spaced @ 120mm O.C
Fig.1 Pressure Diagram induced by Soil & Surcharge 
Note: 
As per actual condition of the wall 
the reaction induced by the slab at 
the above level is considered. 
d5 
d6 
Weights and Forces: Consider 1.0 meter strip 
Weight due to concrete wall, W1 = ɣc*(h1-h)*b*t 17.400 
KN 
Weight due to concrete footing, W2 = ɣc*L*b*h 15.360 
KN 
Weight to soil backfill, W3 = ɣs*((L-t)/2)*(h1-h)*b 35.235 
KN 
Reaction induced by slab @ the upper level, RB 5.863 
KN 
Force induced by the soil backfill, Psoil 25.230 
KN 
Force induced by surcharge load, Psur 7.569 
KN 
Moment arm about toe: 
Moment arm for soil induced force, d1 = h1/3 1100.00 
mm 
Moment arm for surcharge force, d2 = h1/2 1650.00 
mm 
Moment arm for force due to slab above level, d3 = h1 3300.00 
mm 
Moment arm for soil backfill, d4 = L - (L-t)/4) 1262.50 
mm 
Moment arm for wight concrete wall, d5 = L/2 800.00 
mm 
CHECK FOR STABILITY FOR NORMAL CONDITION 
A 
B 
RB 
d1 
d2 
d3 
Psoil 
Psur 
W1 
W2 
W3 
L 
h 
d4 
HEEL TOE 
Moment arm for weight of concrete footing, d6 = L/2 mm 
Check for factor of safety as per code provision: 
Resisting Moment, RM = (RB*d3)+(W1*d5)+(W2*d6)+(W3*d4) KN.m 
Overturning Moment, OM = (Psoil*d1) + (Psur*d2) KN.m 
Summation for vertical forces, Ry = W1 + W2 + W3 KN 
Check for factor of safety against sliding, FSSL = μ*(RY/(Psoil+Psur-RB)) 
Check for factor of safety against overturning, FSOT= RM/OM 
90.042 
40.242 
67.995 
1.26 
2.24 
Check for allowable soil bearing pressure : 
Distance of resultant from toe, X = (RM - OM)/Ry mm 
Eccentricity of Resultant Force e = L/2 - X mm 
Check if Trapezoidal or Triangular Pressure, L/6 mm 
Calculate Minimum Soil Pressure, qumin = (Ry/L)*(1 - 6*e/L) kPa 
Calculate for Maximum Soil Pressure, qumax = (Ry/L)*(1 + 6*e/L) kPa 
DESIGN OF REINFORCEMENT OF HEEL: 
Effective depth of footing to be consider, heff = h - Cc - Øh/2 319.00 
mm 
Factored Weight due to Soil at Rear Face, W3U = 1.35*(ɣS*((L-t)/2))*(h1-h)*b 47.57 
KN 
Factored Weight due to concrete at heel portion, WheelU = 1.25*(ɣC*(L-t)/2*h*b) 8.10 
KN 
Calculate for Factored Shear at the face of top base, Vu = W3U + WheelU 55.67 
KN 
Caculate for Ultimate bending Moment, Mu = (W3U + WheelU)*((L-t)/4)) 18.788 
KN.m 
Note : Although it is true that there is some upward soil pressure, the designer choose to neglect it because it is rela-tively 
small. This is the unlikely condition that would exist if there occurred a leteral force overload and no asso-ciated 
increased vertical loads causing uplift of the heel. The ultimate moment must be due to the factored load 
(wt of soil including surcharge and weight of footing on the postion of heel. 
Nominal Shear provided by concrete, Vc = 0.17*λ*SQRT(fc')*b*heff 286.96 
KN 
Calculation for factored shear provided by concrete, ɸsVc KN 
2) Mpa 
Coefficeint of resistance, Rn = Mu / (ɸf*b*heff 
Check for rho min , sqrt(fc')/4*fy 
Rho min should not be less than with, 1.4/fy 
Therefore adopt rho min, ρmin = 
Calculate for theoritical rho, ρ = (0.85*fc'/fy)*(1 - sqrt(1 - 2*Rn/(0.85*fc')) 
Calculate for rho balnce, ρb = 0.85*fc'*β1*600 / fy*(600 + fy) 
Calculate for rho max, ρmax = 0.75*ρb 
732.40 
67.60 
266.67 
Therefore, Basement Retaining Wall is failed against sliding, Provide Shear Key 
Therefore, Basement Retaining Wall is safe agaisnt overturning, section increase not needed 
When e < L/6 adopt Trapezoidal Pressure 
When qumax < qall, therefore section is satisfactory 
800.00 
215.22 
0.205 
0.0034 
0.0005 
The footing thickness h is adeqaute to carry such shear stresses 
0.0032 
0.0034 
Use rho minimum for design 
31.725 
53.269 
N.A 
N.A 
Non-Compliant 
Compliant 
Compliant 
Compliant 
Compliant 
Non-compliant 
AASHTO 5.8.9.1A 
NSCP II-Sec. 5.5.5 
AASHTO 5.8.9.1A 
NSCP II-Sec. 5.5.5 
AASHTO 11.5.5 
AASHTO 11.5.5 
NSCP I--Sec.411.4.1.1 
NSCP I--Sec.411.2 
NSCP I--Sec.410.6.1 
NSCP I--Sec.410.6.1 
Therefore adopt design rho, ρdes = 
Not Aplicable 
0.0034
Calculation for mechanical ratio, ω = ρdes*fy/fc' 
0.0500 
Check for the req'd thickness of the ft., hreq'd = sqrt(Mu/(ɸf*fc'*b*ω*(1-0.59*ω)) 123.95 
mm 
The assumed base/footing thickness is satisfactory 
2 
Calculate for the total req'd steel area, As = ρdes*b*heff 1078.74 
mm2 
Calculation for main steel area provided, Apro = PI()*(Øh2)/4 113.10 
mmCalculation for number of bars per strip, N = As/Apro 10 
pcs 
Calculation for req'd main bar spacing, Sreq'd = b/N 100 
mm 
Therefore use: 10 - Ø12mm main steel bar in heel spaced @100mm O.C 
Temperature and Shrinkage bar: TOP BARS 
For grade 276 bars, steel ratio, ρtemp 
0.0020 
2 
Calculation for req'd steel area,Areq'd = ρtemp*L*h 1280.00 
mm22 
Calculation for temp and shrink bar provided, Apro = PI()*Øtb/4 78.540 
mmCalculation for number of bar per meter strip, N = Areq'd/Apro 17 
pcs 
Calculate for req'd spacing, Sreq'd = L/N 90 
mm 
Check for Spacing, 5*h mm 
2000 
450 
450 mm mm 
Therefore use: 17 - Ø10mm temperature and shrinkage bar space @90mm O.C 
DESIGN OF REINFORCEMENT OF TOE: 
Fig. 2 Trapeziodal Pressure Diagram 
Note: 
- The max. pressure at the 
base footing create bending 
moment at the stem of wall 
and shear. The designer 
choose to neglect the soil 
on top of footing . 
Calculation for dist. From toe to the face of stem, (L-t)/2 mm 
Calculation for valu of q1 = qumax - qumin 21.544 
kPa 
Calculation for value of q2 = (q1*(L-t)/2)/L 9.089 
kPa 
Compliant 
Per meter strip 
NSCP I- Sec. 407.13.2.1 
NSCP I- Sec 407.13.2.2 
NSCP I- Sec 407.13.2.2 
675.00 
(L-t)/2 
R2 
R1 
qumax 
qumin 
q2 
q1 
Calculation for value of R1 = (qumax - q2)*((L-t)/2)*b 29.822 
KN 
Calculation for value of R2 = 1/2*(q2)*((L-t)/2)*b 3.068 
KN 
Calculation for factored shear, Vu = 1.6*(R1+R2) 52.623 
KN 
Calculation for factored moment, Mu = 1.6*(R1*(L-t)/4) + 1.6*(R2*(2/3)*((L-t)/2)) 18.312 
KN 
Nominal Shear provided by concrete, Vc = 0.17*λ*SQRT(fc')*b*heff 286.96 
KN 
Calculation for factored shear provided by concrete, ɸsVc 
215.22 
Coefficeint of resistance, Rn = Mu / (ɸf*b*heff) Mpa 
Check for rho min , sqrt(fc')/4*fy 
Rho min should not be less than with, 1.4/fy 
Therefore adopt rho min, ρmin = 
Calculate for theoritical rho, ρ = (0.85*fc'/fy)*(1 - sqrt(1 - 2*Rn/(0.85*fc')) 
Calculate for rho balnce, ρb = 0.85*fc'*β1*600 / fy*(600 + fy) 
Calculate for rho max, ρmax = 0.75*ρb 
Therefore adopt design rho, ρdes = 
Calculation for mechanical ratio, ω = ρdes*fy/fc' 
Check for the req'd thickness of the ft., hreq'd = sqrt(Mu/(ɸf*fc'*b*ω*(1-0.59*ω)) 122.37 
mm 
Calculate for the total req'd steel area, As = ρdes*b*heff mm2 
Calculation for main steel area provided, Apro = PI()*(Øh2)/4 mm2 
Calculation for number of bars per strip, N = As/Apro pcs 
Calculation for req'd main bar spacing, Sreq'd = b/N mm 
Therefore use: 10 - Ø12mm main steel bar @ toe spaced @100mm O.C 
1078.74 
113.10 
10 
100 
Temperature and Shrinkage bar: BOT BARS 
For grade 276 bars, steel ratio, ρtemp 
0.0020 
2 
Calculation for req'd steel area,Areq'd = ρtemp*L*h 1280.00 
mm2 
Calculation for temp and shrink bar provided, Apro = PI()*Øtb2/4 mmCalculation for number of bar per meter strip, N = Areq'd/Apro pcs 
Calculate for req'd spacing, Sreq'd = L/N mm 
Check for Spacing, 5*h mm 
450 mm mm 
Therefore use: 17 - Ø10mm temperature and shinkage bar @ toe spaced @90mm O.C 
N.A 
N.A 
0.0034 
0.0500 
The assumed base/footing thickness is satisfactory 
0.200 
0.0032 
0.0034 
0.0034 
0.0005 
78.540 
17 
90 
2000 
450 
Compliant 
Non-compliant 
Compliant 
NSCP I--Sec.411.4.1.1 
NSCP I--Sec.411.2 
NSCP I--Sec.410.6.1 
NSCP I--Sec.410.6.1 
NSCP Sec. 407.13.2.1 
NSCP Sec 407.13.2.2 
NSCP Sec 407.13.2.2 
The footing thickness h is adeqaute to carry such shear stresses 
Use rho minimum for design 
Not Aplicable
Fig. 3 . Passive Earth Pressure 
Total active pressure, F = Psoil + Psur 32.799 
KN 
Vertical Resultant, Ry= 67.995 
KN 
Required resistant for sliding, Fu =1.5*F 49.199 
KN 
Friction Resistance , Fr = μ*Ry 33.998 
KN 
Furnished Resisitance,R = Fu - Fr 15.201 
KN 
Required height of Shear Key, hT = sqrt(2*R/(ɣs*kp)) 760.00 
mm 
Height of shear key, hs = hT - h 360.00 
mm 
Calculation for Coefficient of Passive Pressure, kp = (1 + sinɸ)/(1 - sinɸ) 
3.00 
Passive Rectangular Pressure at the face of shear key, Pp1 = ɣs*h*hs*b*kp 7.776 
KN 
Passive Triangular Pressure at the face of shear key, Pp2 = (1/2)*(ɣs)*(hs^2)*b*kp 3.4992 
KN 
Maximum factored moment, Mu = 1.6*(Pp1*hs/2 + Pp2*(2hs/3)) 3.5831808 
KN.m 
Use rho min, ρmin 
0.0034 
Calculation for mechanical ration, ω = ρmin*fy/fc' 
0.0500 
Calculation for Coefficient of Resistance, Rn = fc'*ω*(1 - 0.59*ω) 1.359 
Mpa 
Calculate for shear key thickness, a = sqrt(Mu/ɸf*Rn*b) 60.00 
mm 
Factore shear force, Vu = 1.6*(R) KN 
Nominal Shear provided by concrete, Vc = 0.17*λ*SQRT(fc')*b*heff KN 
Calculation for factored shear provided by concrete, ɸsVc KN 
Summary of Shear Key section : Total Heigth, hsT = hs + Cc + Øvr/2 mm 
Total Width, aT = a + Cc + Øvr/2 mm 
H. Results & Reinforcement Arragement 
BASE SHEAR KEY NOMENCLATURE 
24.322 
43.275 
32.456 
Compliant 
NSCP I--Sec.411.4.1.1 
NSCP I--Sec.411.2 
The shear key thickness is adequate to carry such shear stress 
Therefore, for the reinforcement of shear key extent the vertical bars at the rear face to the shear key 
450.00 
150.00 
Pp1 
Pp2 
h 
hS 
hT 
a 
R 
6- φ12mm space @ 160mm O.C 
24-Ø10mm space @ 
160mm O.C 
EXPOSED FACE OF BASEMENT 
WALL. 
8 - Ø10mm spaced @ SOIL BACKFILL @ REAR 
120mm O.C FACE OF THE WALL. 
24 - Ø10mm spaced @ 
120mm O.C 
10 - Ø12mm 
10 - Ø12mm spaced @100mm O.C 
spaced @100mm O.C 
TOE HEEL 
17 - Ø10mm 
space @90mm O.C 
17 - Ø10mm 
spaced @90mm O.C 
REVISION NO. DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE CHECKED DATE APPROVED
Fig.1 Pressure Diagram induced by Seismic Force & Surcharge 
B 
d6 
Weights and Forces: Consider 1.0 meter strip 
Weight due to concrete wall, W1 = ɣc*(h1-h)*b*t 17.400 
KN 
Weight due to concrete footing, W2 = ɣc*L*b*h 15.360 
KN 
Weight to soil backfill, W3 = ɣs*((L-t)/2)*(h1-h)*b 35.235 
KN 
Reaction induced by slab @ the upper level, RB 5.863 
KN 
Force induced by seismic, PAE = (0.375(kh)(γws)(h1)2) KN 
Force induced by surcharge load, Psur KN 
14.702 
7.569 
CHECK FOR STABILITY FOR SEISMIC CONDITION 
A 
RB 
d5 
d7 
d2 
d3 
PAE 
Psur 
W1 
W2 
W3 
L 
h 
d4 
HEEL TOE 
Moment arm about toe: 
Moment arm for soil induced force, d7 = 2*h1/3 2200.00 
mm 
Moment arm for surcharge force, d2 = h1/2 1650.00 
mm 
Moment arm for force due to slab above level, d3 = h1 3300.00 
mm 
Moment arm for soil backfill, d4 = L - (L-t)/4) 1262.50 
mm 
Moment arm for wight concrete wall, d5 = L/2 800.00 
mm 
Moment arm for weight of concrete footing, d6 L/2 800.00 
mm 
Check for factor of safety as per code provision: 
Resisting Moment, RM = (RB*d3)+(W1*d5)+(W2*d6)+(W3*d4) 90.042 
KN.m 
Overturning Moment, OM = (PAE*d1) + (Psur*d2) 44.832 
KN.m 
Summation for vertical forces, Ry = W1 + W2 + W3 67.995 
KN 
Check for factor of safety against sliding, FSSL = μ*(RY/(Psoil+Psur)) 
AASHTO 5.8.9.1A 2.07 Compliant 
NSCP II-Sec. 5.5.5 Thefore, Basement Retaining Wall is safe against sliding, Shear Key is not Needed 
AASHTO 5.8.9.1A Check for factor of safety against overturning, FSOT= RM/OM 2.01 Compliant 
NSCP II-Sec. 5.5.5 Therefore, Basement Retaining Wall is safe agaisnt overturning, section increase not needed

More Related Content

What's hot

23262483 unit-cost-derivation
23262483 unit-cost-derivation23262483 unit-cost-derivation
23262483 unit-cost-derivation
imaduddin91
 
Moment of inertia of non symmetric object
Moment of inertia of non symmetric objectMoment of inertia of non symmetric object
Moment of inertia of non symmetric object
Intishar Rahman
 

What's hot (20)

reinforced concrete arki.ppt
reinforced concrete arki.pptreinforced concrete arki.ppt
reinforced concrete arki.ppt
 
NSCP 2010 , Volume 1
NSCP 2010 , Volume 1NSCP 2010 , Volume 1
NSCP 2010 , Volume 1
 
23262483 unit-cost-derivation
23262483 unit-cost-derivation23262483 unit-cost-derivation
23262483 unit-cost-derivation
 
Combined footings
Combined footingsCombined footings
Combined footings
 
1
11
1
 
Structurala Analysis Report
Structurala Analysis ReportStructurala Analysis Report
Structurala Analysis Report
 
Friction full
Friction fullFriction full
Friction full
 
Moving load
Moving loadMoving load
Moving load
 
Doubly reinforced beam design
Doubly reinforced beam   designDoubly reinforced beam   design
Doubly reinforced beam design
 
Doubly reinforced beam analysis
Doubly reinforced beam   analysisDoubly reinforced beam   analysis
Doubly reinforced beam analysis
 
Solution Manual for Structural Analysis 6th SI by Aslam Kassimali
Solution Manual for Structural Analysis 6th SI by Aslam KassimaliSolution Manual for Structural Analysis 6th SI by Aslam Kassimali
Solution Manual for Structural Analysis 6th SI by Aslam Kassimali
 
Ge 105 lecture 3 (LEVELING ADJUSTMENT) by: Broddett B. Abatayo
Ge 105 lecture 3 (LEVELING ADJUSTMENT) by: Broddett B. AbatayoGe 105 lecture 3 (LEVELING ADJUSTMENT) by: Broddett B. Abatayo
Ge 105 lecture 3 (LEVELING ADJUSTMENT) by: Broddett B. Abatayo
 
Structural Analysis, Hibbeler, 8th ed Textbook
Structural Analysis, Hibbeler, 8th ed Textbook Structural Analysis, Hibbeler, 8th ed Textbook
Structural Analysis, Hibbeler, 8th ed Textbook
 
Moment of inertia of non symmetric object
Moment of inertia of non symmetric objectMoment of inertia of non symmetric object
Moment of inertia of non symmetric object
 
Cek penampang kolom baja gable
Cek penampang kolom baja gableCek penampang kolom baja gable
Cek penampang kolom baja gable
 
Structural Analysis 8th Edition Solutions Manual
Structural Analysis 8th Edition Solutions ManualStructural Analysis 8th Edition Solutions Manual
Structural Analysis 8th Edition Solutions Manual
 
Steel building design worked example
Steel building design worked exampleSteel building design worked example
Steel building design worked example
 
Basement wall design
Basement wall designBasement wall design
Basement wall design
 
Design of isolated footing by ACI code
Design of isolated footing by ACI codeDesign of isolated footing by ACI code
Design of isolated footing by ACI code
 
183013186 contoh-perhitungan-gempa-statik-ekuivalen
183013186 contoh-perhitungan-gempa-statik-ekuivalen183013186 contoh-perhitungan-gempa-statik-ekuivalen
183013186 contoh-perhitungan-gempa-statik-ekuivalen
 

Similar to Print Wall

Rectangular tank example_latest
Rectangular tank example_latestRectangular tank example_latest
Rectangular tank example_latest
Vedachalam Mani
 
FOUNDATION ENGINEERING AND VARIOUS SITE TESTS PROCEDURES .ppt
FOUNDATION ENGINEERING AND VARIOUS SITE TESTS PROCEDURES .pptFOUNDATION ENGINEERING AND VARIOUS SITE TESTS PROCEDURES .ppt
FOUNDATION ENGINEERING AND VARIOUS SITE TESTS PROCEDURES .ppt
DrJLogeshwariAsstPro
 
Design Proposal for a Single and Double Span Bridge using Cost Analysis
Design Proposal for a Single and Double Span Bridge using Cost AnalysisDesign Proposal for a Single and Double Span Bridge using Cost Analysis
Design Proposal for a Single and Double Span Bridge using Cost Analysis
Michael Masi, Jr. Eng.
 
New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptx
New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptxNew Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptx
New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptx
RajeshKumar25548
 
Clinic update.pdf
Clinic update.pdfClinic update.pdf
Clinic update.pdf
NayMin39
 
Whatisworkofcivilengineeronconstructionsite 190827025839 (9 files merged)
Whatisworkofcivilengineeronconstructionsite 190827025839 (9 files merged)Whatisworkofcivilengineeronconstructionsite 190827025839 (9 files merged)
Whatisworkofcivilengineeronconstructionsite 190827025839 (9 files merged)
AMIT PAYAL
 
MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)
MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)
MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)
sufiyan shaikh
 

Similar to Print Wall (20)

Padeye calculation example
Padeye calculation examplePadeye calculation example
Padeye calculation example
 
Rectangular tank example_latest
Rectangular tank example_latestRectangular tank example_latest
Rectangular tank example_latest
 
Sachpazis pile analysis & design. calculation according to en 1997 1-2004
Sachpazis pile analysis & design. calculation according to en 1997 1-2004Sachpazis pile analysis & design. calculation according to en 1997 1-2004
Sachpazis pile analysis & design. calculation according to en 1997 1-2004
 
post tensioning slabs
post tensioning slabspost tensioning slabs
post tensioning slabs
 
FOUNDATION ENGINEERING AND VARIOUS SITE TESTS PROCEDURES .ppt
FOUNDATION ENGINEERING AND VARIOUS SITE TESTS PROCEDURES .pptFOUNDATION ENGINEERING AND VARIOUS SITE TESTS PROCEDURES .ppt
FOUNDATION ENGINEERING AND VARIOUS SITE TESTS PROCEDURES .ppt
 
Design Proposal for a Single and Double Span Bridge using Cost Analysis
Design Proposal for a Single and Double Span Bridge using Cost AnalysisDesign Proposal for a Single and Double Span Bridge using Cost Analysis
Design Proposal for a Single and Double Span Bridge using Cost Analysis
 
Base plate and anchor design
Base plate and anchor designBase plate and anchor design
Base plate and anchor design
 
New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptx
New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptxNew Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptx
New Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation.pptx
 
Clinic update.pdf
Clinic update.pdfClinic update.pdf
Clinic update.pdf
 
Anchor bolt design
Anchor bolt designAnchor bolt design
Anchor bolt design
 
Sample
Sample Sample
Sample
 
1stSymposiumTALK_Closed_Conduit-Paul_Ghamry
1stSymposiumTALK_Closed_Conduit-Paul_Ghamry1stSymposiumTALK_Closed_Conduit-Paul_Ghamry
1stSymposiumTALK_Closed_Conduit-Paul_Ghamry
 
Design and detailing_of_retaining_walls counter fort.تصميم الجدران الاستنادية...
Design and detailing_of_retaining_walls counter fort.تصميم الجدران الاستنادية...Design and detailing_of_retaining_walls counter fort.تصميم الجدران الاستنادية...
Design and detailing_of_retaining_walls counter fort.تصميم الجدران الاستنادية...
 
Rcc member design steps
Rcc member design stepsRcc member design steps
Rcc member design steps
 
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line SystemIRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
IRJET- Design of the Support Structure for the Pipe Line System
 
Sachpazis: 4 rc piles cap design with eccentricity example (bs8110 part1-1997)
Sachpazis: 4 rc piles cap design with eccentricity example (bs8110 part1-1997)Sachpazis: 4 rc piles cap design with eccentricity example (bs8110 part1-1997)
Sachpazis: 4 rc piles cap design with eccentricity example (bs8110 part1-1997)
 
Whatisworkofcivilengineeronconstructionsite 190827025839 (9 files merged)
Whatisworkofcivilengineeronconstructionsite 190827025839 (9 files merged)Whatisworkofcivilengineeronconstructionsite 190827025839 (9 files merged)
Whatisworkofcivilengineeronconstructionsite 190827025839 (9 files merged)
 
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog 1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
 
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog 1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
1.4 latifs 17 dramix sog
 
MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)
MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)
MAIN CANOPY BAJAJ HR(22.09.2016)
 

Print Wall

  • 1. Date : Client : Subject : Project ID SD - KIOSK-MYNLD ANGEL LA ZA RO & A SSOCIA TES INTERNA TIONA L Cal'c by A.H. Sinconiegue (Consulting Engineer & Architects) Date Jul-21-2014 Checked by Rhonda Divina A. Rapirap MAYNILAD Aprroved by Angel Lazaro III. Ph.D Analysis & Design of Basement Wall Nomenclature Date PROPOSED FOOD KIOSK SURCHARGE d5 d6 t BASEMENT Seismic Pressure Diag. Surcharge Diag. Soil Pressure Diag. WALL SECTION Jul-21-2014 Jul-21-2014 Jul-21-2014 Date PAE d7 A B RB d1 d2 d3 Psoil Psur W1 W2 W3 L h d4 HEEL TOE h1 H Analysis and Design Refferences : Fig. A - BASEMENT WALL NOMENCLATURE 1.0 National Structural Code of The Philippines (NSCP) 2010, Volume 1 , 6th Edition for Building, Towers and other Vertical Srtuctures by : Association of Structural Engineers in the Philippines. ( ASEP) 2.0 National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP) 1997, Volumn 2, 2ND Edition, Bridges ASD(Allowable Stress Design) by: Association of Structural Engineers in the Philippines. ( ASEP) 3.0 AASHTO Bridge Design and Specification 2002-2010 by: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) 4.0 Design of Reinforced Concrete ACI 318-05 Code Edition, Seventh Edition by: Jack C. McCormac & James K. Nelson Spreadsheet Condition This spreadsheet is applicable only on non- slopping backfill and the use of this spreadsheet is only for structure having the same configuration. Wall Dimensions : Design Notes: Total height of retaining wall, H mm - Neglect Soil Passive Pressure for Critical Design of Stem - NSCP 5.5.2 Height of the soil at the back of the wall, h1 mm Height of the soil at the exposed face of the wall, h2 mm - Wall Inertia Effects not considered - NSCP 5.6.4 Stem thickness, t mm Total length of footing, L mm - Overall Stability with Earthquake Force (Seed & Whitman) - AASHTO 5.8.9.1 Footing thickness, h mm Surcharge Height, Sh = mm - Factor of Safety in Sliding and Overturning are Reduced to 75% of Original Value at Earthquake Condition - AASHTO 5.8.9.1A - Wall analyzed as Propped Beam. 3300 3300 1200 250 1600 400 150
  • 2. Date : Client : Subject : Project ID SD - KIOSK-MYNLD REFERENCE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN CALCULATION REMARKS A. WALL PARAMETERS Total height of retaining wall, H mm Height of the soil at the back of the wall, h1 mm Height of the soil at the exposed face of the wall, h2 mm Stem thickness, t mm Total length of footing, L mm Footing thickness, h mm Surcharge Height, Sh = mm B. CONCRETE PARAMETERS 3300 3300 1200 250 1600 400 150 Compressive strength @ 28 days, f'c Mpa Modulus of Elasticity, Ec = 4700√f'c Mpa Unit weight (normal concrete), γc KN/m3 C. STEEL PARAMETERS 28 24870.06 24 276 MPa (Grade 40) for 12mm and smaller Ø bars , fy Mpa (to be used for temp. and shrinkage bars) MPa (Grade 60) for larger Ø bars (>12mm) , fy 414 Mpa (to be used for main and shear bars) Modulus of Elasticity, Es Mpa Main Horizontal bar size at exposed side, Øhe mm MainVertical bar size at exposed side, Øve mm Main Horizontal bar size at rear, Øhr mm Main Vertical bar size at rear, Øvr mm Main Reinforcement bar size at heel, Øh mm Main Reinforcement bar size at toe, Øt mm Temperature bar size, Øtb mm Stirrup bar size, Øs mm NSCP II-Sec. 8.7.1 NSCP II-Sec.8.7.2 ANGEL LA ZA RO & A SSOCIA TES INTERNA TIONA L (Consulting Engineer & Architects) Jul-21-2014 MAYNILAD Analysis & Design of Basement Wall Nomenclature A.H. Sinconiegue Jul-21-2014 Rhonda Divina A. Rapirap Jul-21-2014 Angel Lazaro III. Ph.D Jul-21-2014 Cal'c by Date Checked by Date Aprroved by Date 200000 10 10 10 12 12 12 10 12 D. SOIL PARAMETERS Unit Weight of Soil, ɣs KN/m3 Allowable Bearing Capacity on Site, qall kPa Surcharge, S kPa Factor of Saefty against Overturning, FSOT Factor of Saefty against Sliding, FSSL Angle of Internal friction of soil, φ ° Backfill Slope angle, β ° E. Seismic Parameter 2.7 2 1.5 30 0.00 Importance Factor, I Acceleration factor, A Horizontal Acceleration Coefficient, 0.50*A = kh Vertical Acceleration Coefficient, kv Check Horizontal Acceleration, (1-kv)*TAN(φ-β) Arc tan(kh/(1-kv)) = θ ° F. Miscellaneous Parameters 1 0.40 0.2 0.00 0.46 Consider 1.0 meter strip , b mm Minimum Concrete Cover, Cc mm Flexural strength reduction factor, φf Shear strength reduction factor, φs Compressive block depth reduction factor, β 1 Normal weight concrete modification factor, λ Coefficient of Friction, μ = G. Design Calculation 1000 75 0.9 0.75 1.0 0.5 Calculation for coefficient of active pressure, ka = (1-sinɸ)/(1+sinɸ) Consider 1.0 meter strip, b = mm Calculation for active soil force, Psoil = 1/2*ɣs*(h1-h)^2*ka KN Calculation surcharge force, Psur = (S/ɣs)*(ɣs)*(h1-T)Ka KN Calculation for negative unfactored moment @ base, Mnneg Mnneg = Psoil*(h1-h)/7.5 + Psur*(h1-h)/8 KN.m Calculation for negative factored moment @ base, Muneg = 1.6*Mn KN.m Convert resultant force into a uniform load For soil force, w1 = 2*Psoil/(h1-h) KN/m For surcharge force, w2 = Psur/(h1-h) KN/m Effective length, leff = (h1 - h) mm Summation of moment about point B, Ra = Mn/leff + (w1*leff)/3 + (w2*leff)/3 KN Summation of moment about point A, RB = (w1*leff)/6 + (w2*leff)/2 - Mn/leff KN Calculation for dist where max moment occur @ shear is zero, x NSCP II-Sec.5.5.5 NSCP II-Sec.5.5.5 NSCP II-App. (H-9) NSCP II-App. (H-8) NSCP I-Sec.407.8.3.1 NSCP I-Sec.409.4.2.1 NSCP I-Sec.409.4.2.3 NSCP I-Sec.410.3.7.3 NSCP I-Sec.411.3.1.1 18 150 11.31 0.85 0.33 1000 25.23 7.569 12.499 19.999 17.4 2.61 2900 24.915 7.884 - x - x2 7.884 2.61 3 = 0 by trial and error , x = 1243.46 mm Derived from shear diag.
  • 3. Calculation for max positive unfactore moment, Mnpos Mnpos = RB*x - w1*x^3/6*leff - w2*x^2/2 KN.m Calculation for factore positve moment, Mupos = 1.6*Mnpos 9.382 KN.m Check if assumed stem thickness is adequate to carry induced load by soil Calculation for effective thickness, teff = t - cc - Øvr/2 169.00 mm Coefficient of Resistance, Rn = Mu/ɸf*b*teff 2 MPa Check for rho min , sqrt(fc')/4*fy Rho min should not be less than with, 1.4/fy Therefore adopt rho min, ρmin = Calculation for rho theoritical, ρ = 0.85*fc'/fy ( 1 - sqrt( 1 - 2*Rn/0.85*fc')) Calculate for rho balnce, ρb = 0.85*fc'*β1*600 / fy*(600 + fy) Calculate for rho max, ρmax = 0.75*ρb Not Aplicable 0.78 0.0032 0.0034 Therefor adopt design rho, ρdes = Calculation for mechanical ratio, ω = ρdes*fy/fc' 0.0500 Check for the req'd thickness of the stem, treq'd = sqrt(Muneg/(ɸf*fc'*b*ω*(1-0.59*ω)) mm Vertical Reinforcement Design @ the rear face of the wall : 2 Calculate for minimum vertical steel area, Avmin = 0.0015*b*t mm2 Calcualtion for the total vert. steel area required, Avreq'd = ρdes*b*teff 571.50 mm2 Check for actual vertical steel area required, Aactual mm2 Calculation for provide main steel area, AØvr = PI()*(Øvr)2/4 113.10 mmCalculation for total number bars, N = Aactual/Aøvr 6.0 pcs Calculation for Spacing, Svr , b/N 160.00 mm Check vert spacing, 3*t mm 450 mm Therefore adopt actual spacing, Sactual mm Therefore use : 6- φ12mm vertical main bars spaced @ 160mm O.C Check for Shear adequacy of wall: Calculation for factored shear force, Vu =1.6( MAX( RA & RB)) 39.863 KN Nominal Shear provided by concrete, Vc = 0.17*λ*SQRT(fc')*b*teff 152.025 KN Calculation for factored shear provided by concrete, ɸsVc 114.019 KN Check Vu if < 0.5*ɸsVc KN Check for development length on bottom of wall footing: Calculate for, ldc = 0.24*fy*Øvr/λ*SQRT(fc') 226 mm NSCP I-Sec.410.6.1 NSCP I-Sec.410.6.1 NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 NSCP I-Sec.411.4.1.1 NSCP I-Sec.411.2 NSCP I-Sec.411.6.6.1 NSCP I-Sec.412.4.2 Derived from moment diag. Non-compliant Compliant Per meter strip 5.863 127.89 Therefore, Assumed thickness is satisfactory Stem thickness is adequate to carry shear stresses 375 571.50 750.00 450.00 160.00 57.009 NSCP I-Sec.414.4.2 Use rho minimum for design 0.0034 0.0019 N.A N.A 0.0034 214 Calculate for, ldc = 0.043*fy*Øvr mm Therefore adopt maximum value above, ldc 226 mm Check for minumum, ldcmm 200 mm Therefore adopt for actual development length, ldcact 226 mm Horizontal Reinforcement Design @ the rear face of the wall: 2 Calculate main steel area provided, Aøhr = PI()*(Øhr)2/4 78.540 mm2 Calculate for total hor. steel area req'd, Ahreq'd = 0.0025*(h1-h)*t 1812.5 mmCalculation for total number of main bar, N = Ahreq'd / Aøhr 24 pcs Calculation for horizontal spacing, Shr = (h1-h)/N mm Check hor. spacing : 3*t mm 120 750 450 120 450 mm Therefore adopt actual spacing, Sactual = mm Therefore use : 24-Ø10mm horizontal main bar spaced @120mmO.C Vertical Main Reinforcement Design @ the exposed face of the wall: Coefficient of resistance, Rn = Mupos/ɸf*b*teff 2 MPa Check for rho min , sqrt(fc')/4*fy Rho min should not be less than with, 1.4/fy Therefore adopt rho min, ρmin = Calculation for rho theoritical, ρ = 0.85*fc'/fy ( 1 - sqrt( 1 - 2*Rn/0.85*fc')) Calculate for rho balnce, ρb = 0.85*fc'*β1*600 / fy*(600 + fy) Calculate for rho max, ρmax = 0.75*ρb N.A N.A Therefor adopt design rho, ρdes = 0.0034 Vertical Reinforcement Design @ the exposed face of the wall : 2 Calculate for minimum vertical steel area, Avmin = 0.0015*b*t 375 mm2 Calcualtion for the total vert. steel area required, Avreq'd = ρdes*b*teff 571.50 mm2 Check for actual vertical steel area required, Aactual 571.50 mm2 Calculation for provide main steel area, AØve = PI()*(Øve)2/4 78.54 mmCalculation for total number bars, N = Aactual/Aøve pcs Calculation for Spacing, Sve , b/N mm Check vert. spacing, 3*t mm 120 750 450 450 mm Therefore adopt actual spacing, Sactual 120 mm Therefore use: 8 - Ø10mm vertical main bar spaced @ 120mm O.C Horizontal Reinforcement Design @ the exposed face of the wall: 2 Calculate main steel area provided, Aøhe = PI()*(Øhe)2/4 mm2 Calculate for total hor. steel area req'd, Ahreq'd = 0.0025*(h1-h)*t mmCalculation for total number of main bar, N = Ahreq'd / Aøhe pcs Calculation for horizontal spacing, Shr = (h1-h)/N mm Check hor. spacing : 3*t mm 450 mm Therefore adopt actual spacing, S = mm NSCP I-Sec.412.4.2 NSCP I-Sec.412.4.1 NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.3 NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 NSCP I-Sec.410.6.1 NSCP I-Sec.410.6.1 NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.2 Compliant Full Height of Wall Non-compliant Use rho minimum for design Not Aplicable 0.365 0.0032 0.0034 0.0034 0.0009 78.540 1812.5 24 120 750 450 120 NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 NSCP I-Sec.414.4.3 NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 NSCP I-Sec. 414.4.5 8.0 Full Height of Wall Sactual Therefore use: 24 - Ø10mm horizontal main bar spaced @ 120mm O.C
  • 4. Fig.1 Pressure Diagram induced by Soil & Surcharge Note: As per actual condition of the wall the reaction induced by the slab at the above level is considered. d5 d6 Weights and Forces: Consider 1.0 meter strip Weight due to concrete wall, W1 = ɣc*(h1-h)*b*t 17.400 KN Weight due to concrete footing, W2 = ɣc*L*b*h 15.360 KN Weight to soil backfill, W3 = ɣs*((L-t)/2)*(h1-h)*b 35.235 KN Reaction induced by slab @ the upper level, RB 5.863 KN Force induced by the soil backfill, Psoil 25.230 KN Force induced by surcharge load, Psur 7.569 KN Moment arm about toe: Moment arm for soil induced force, d1 = h1/3 1100.00 mm Moment arm for surcharge force, d2 = h1/2 1650.00 mm Moment arm for force due to slab above level, d3 = h1 3300.00 mm Moment arm for soil backfill, d4 = L - (L-t)/4) 1262.50 mm Moment arm for wight concrete wall, d5 = L/2 800.00 mm CHECK FOR STABILITY FOR NORMAL CONDITION A B RB d1 d2 d3 Psoil Psur W1 W2 W3 L h d4 HEEL TOE Moment arm for weight of concrete footing, d6 = L/2 mm Check for factor of safety as per code provision: Resisting Moment, RM = (RB*d3)+(W1*d5)+(W2*d6)+(W3*d4) KN.m Overturning Moment, OM = (Psoil*d1) + (Psur*d2) KN.m Summation for vertical forces, Ry = W1 + W2 + W3 KN Check for factor of safety against sliding, FSSL = μ*(RY/(Psoil+Psur-RB)) Check for factor of safety against overturning, FSOT= RM/OM 90.042 40.242 67.995 1.26 2.24 Check for allowable soil bearing pressure : Distance of resultant from toe, X = (RM - OM)/Ry mm Eccentricity of Resultant Force e = L/2 - X mm Check if Trapezoidal or Triangular Pressure, L/6 mm Calculate Minimum Soil Pressure, qumin = (Ry/L)*(1 - 6*e/L) kPa Calculate for Maximum Soil Pressure, qumax = (Ry/L)*(1 + 6*e/L) kPa DESIGN OF REINFORCEMENT OF HEEL: Effective depth of footing to be consider, heff = h - Cc - Øh/2 319.00 mm Factored Weight due to Soil at Rear Face, W3U = 1.35*(ɣS*((L-t)/2))*(h1-h)*b 47.57 KN Factored Weight due to concrete at heel portion, WheelU = 1.25*(ɣC*(L-t)/2*h*b) 8.10 KN Calculate for Factored Shear at the face of top base, Vu = W3U + WheelU 55.67 KN Caculate for Ultimate bending Moment, Mu = (W3U + WheelU)*((L-t)/4)) 18.788 KN.m Note : Although it is true that there is some upward soil pressure, the designer choose to neglect it because it is rela-tively small. This is the unlikely condition that would exist if there occurred a leteral force overload and no asso-ciated increased vertical loads causing uplift of the heel. The ultimate moment must be due to the factored load (wt of soil including surcharge and weight of footing on the postion of heel. Nominal Shear provided by concrete, Vc = 0.17*λ*SQRT(fc')*b*heff 286.96 KN Calculation for factored shear provided by concrete, ɸsVc KN 2) Mpa Coefficeint of resistance, Rn = Mu / (ɸf*b*heff Check for rho min , sqrt(fc')/4*fy Rho min should not be less than with, 1.4/fy Therefore adopt rho min, ρmin = Calculate for theoritical rho, ρ = (0.85*fc'/fy)*(1 - sqrt(1 - 2*Rn/(0.85*fc')) Calculate for rho balnce, ρb = 0.85*fc'*β1*600 / fy*(600 + fy) Calculate for rho max, ρmax = 0.75*ρb 732.40 67.60 266.67 Therefore, Basement Retaining Wall is failed against sliding, Provide Shear Key Therefore, Basement Retaining Wall is safe agaisnt overturning, section increase not needed When e < L/6 adopt Trapezoidal Pressure When qumax < qall, therefore section is satisfactory 800.00 215.22 0.205 0.0034 0.0005 The footing thickness h is adeqaute to carry such shear stresses 0.0032 0.0034 Use rho minimum for design 31.725 53.269 N.A N.A Non-Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Non-compliant AASHTO 5.8.9.1A NSCP II-Sec. 5.5.5 AASHTO 5.8.9.1A NSCP II-Sec. 5.5.5 AASHTO 11.5.5 AASHTO 11.5.5 NSCP I--Sec.411.4.1.1 NSCP I--Sec.411.2 NSCP I--Sec.410.6.1 NSCP I--Sec.410.6.1 Therefore adopt design rho, ρdes = Not Aplicable 0.0034
  • 5. Calculation for mechanical ratio, ω = ρdes*fy/fc' 0.0500 Check for the req'd thickness of the ft., hreq'd = sqrt(Mu/(ɸf*fc'*b*ω*(1-0.59*ω)) 123.95 mm The assumed base/footing thickness is satisfactory 2 Calculate for the total req'd steel area, As = ρdes*b*heff 1078.74 mm2 Calculation for main steel area provided, Apro = PI()*(Øh2)/4 113.10 mmCalculation for number of bars per strip, N = As/Apro 10 pcs Calculation for req'd main bar spacing, Sreq'd = b/N 100 mm Therefore use: 10 - Ø12mm main steel bar in heel spaced @100mm O.C Temperature and Shrinkage bar: TOP BARS For grade 276 bars, steel ratio, ρtemp 0.0020 2 Calculation for req'd steel area,Areq'd = ρtemp*L*h 1280.00 mm22 Calculation for temp and shrink bar provided, Apro = PI()*Øtb/4 78.540 mmCalculation for number of bar per meter strip, N = Areq'd/Apro 17 pcs Calculate for req'd spacing, Sreq'd = L/N 90 mm Check for Spacing, 5*h mm 2000 450 450 mm mm Therefore use: 17 - Ø10mm temperature and shrinkage bar space @90mm O.C DESIGN OF REINFORCEMENT OF TOE: Fig. 2 Trapeziodal Pressure Diagram Note: - The max. pressure at the base footing create bending moment at the stem of wall and shear. The designer choose to neglect the soil on top of footing . Calculation for dist. From toe to the face of stem, (L-t)/2 mm Calculation for valu of q1 = qumax - qumin 21.544 kPa Calculation for value of q2 = (q1*(L-t)/2)/L 9.089 kPa Compliant Per meter strip NSCP I- Sec. 407.13.2.1 NSCP I- Sec 407.13.2.2 NSCP I- Sec 407.13.2.2 675.00 (L-t)/2 R2 R1 qumax qumin q2 q1 Calculation for value of R1 = (qumax - q2)*((L-t)/2)*b 29.822 KN Calculation for value of R2 = 1/2*(q2)*((L-t)/2)*b 3.068 KN Calculation for factored shear, Vu = 1.6*(R1+R2) 52.623 KN Calculation for factored moment, Mu = 1.6*(R1*(L-t)/4) + 1.6*(R2*(2/3)*((L-t)/2)) 18.312 KN Nominal Shear provided by concrete, Vc = 0.17*λ*SQRT(fc')*b*heff 286.96 KN Calculation for factored shear provided by concrete, ɸsVc 215.22 Coefficeint of resistance, Rn = Mu / (ɸf*b*heff) Mpa Check for rho min , sqrt(fc')/4*fy Rho min should not be less than with, 1.4/fy Therefore adopt rho min, ρmin = Calculate for theoritical rho, ρ = (0.85*fc'/fy)*(1 - sqrt(1 - 2*Rn/(0.85*fc')) Calculate for rho balnce, ρb = 0.85*fc'*β1*600 / fy*(600 + fy) Calculate for rho max, ρmax = 0.75*ρb Therefore adopt design rho, ρdes = Calculation for mechanical ratio, ω = ρdes*fy/fc' Check for the req'd thickness of the ft., hreq'd = sqrt(Mu/(ɸf*fc'*b*ω*(1-0.59*ω)) 122.37 mm Calculate for the total req'd steel area, As = ρdes*b*heff mm2 Calculation for main steel area provided, Apro = PI()*(Øh2)/4 mm2 Calculation for number of bars per strip, N = As/Apro pcs Calculation for req'd main bar spacing, Sreq'd = b/N mm Therefore use: 10 - Ø12mm main steel bar @ toe spaced @100mm O.C 1078.74 113.10 10 100 Temperature and Shrinkage bar: BOT BARS For grade 276 bars, steel ratio, ρtemp 0.0020 2 Calculation for req'd steel area,Areq'd = ρtemp*L*h 1280.00 mm2 Calculation for temp and shrink bar provided, Apro = PI()*Øtb2/4 mmCalculation for number of bar per meter strip, N = Areq'd/Apro pcs Calculate for req'd spacing, Sreq'd = L/N mm Check for Spacing, 5*h mm 450 mm mm Therefore use: 17 - Ø10mm temperature and shinkage bar @ toe spaced @90mm O.C N.A N.A 0.0034 0.0500 The assumed base/footing thickness is satisfactory 0.200 0.0032 0.0034 0.0034 0.0005 78.540 17 90 2000 450 Compliant Non-compliant Compliant NSCP I--Sec.411.4.1.1 NSCP I--Sec.411.2 NSCP I--Sec.410.6.1 NSCP I--Sec.410.6.1 NSCP Sec. 407.13.2.1 NSCP Sec 407.13.2.2 NSCP Sec 407.13.2.2 The footing thickness h is adeqaute to carry such shear stresses Use rho minimum for design Not Aplicable
  • 6. Fig. 3 . Passive Earth Pressure Total active pressure, F = Psoil + Psur 32.799 KN Vertical Resultant, Ry= 67.995 KN Required resistant for sliding, Fu =1.5*F 49.199 KN Friction Resistance , Fr = μ*Ry 33.998 KN Furnished Resisitance,R = Fu - Fr 15.201 KN Required height of Shear Key, hT = sqrt(2*R/(ɣs*kp)) 760.00 mm Height of shear key, hs = hT - h 360.00 mm Calculation for Coefficient of Passive Pressure, kp = (1 + sinɸ)/(1 - sinɸ) 3.00 Passive Rectangular Pressure at the face of shear key, Pp1 = ɣs*h*hs*b*kp 7.776 KN Passive Triangular Pressure at the face of shear key, Pp2 = (1/2)*(ɣs)*(hs^2)*b*kp 3.4992 KN Maximum factored moment, Mu = 1.6*(Pp1*hs/2 + Pp2*(2hs/3)) 3.5831808 KN.m Use rho min, ρmin 0.0034 Calculation for mechanical ration, ω = ρmin*fy/fc' 0.0500 Calculation for Coefficient of Resistance, Rn = fc'*ω*(1 - 0.59*ω) 1.359 Mpa Calculate for shear key thickness, a = sqrt(Mu/ɸf*Rn*b) 60.00 mm Factore shear force, Vu = 1.6*(R) KN Nominal Shear provided by concrete, Vc = 0.17*λ*SQRT(fc')*b*heff KN Calculation for factored shear provided by concrete, ɸsVc KN Summary of Shear Key section : Total Heigth, hsT = hs + Cc + Øvr/2 mm Total Width, aT = a + Cc + Øvr/2 mm H. Results & Reinforcement Arragement BASE SHEAR KEY NOMENCLATURE 24.322 43.275 32.456 Compliant NSCP I--Sec.411.4.1.1 NSCP I--Sec.411.2 The shear key thickness is adequate to carry such shear stress Therefore, for the reinforcement of shear key extent the vertical bars at the rear face to the shear key 450.00 150.00 Pp1 Pp2 h hS hT a R 6- φ12mm space @ 160mm O.C 24-Ø10mm space @ 160mm O.C EXPOSED FACE OF BASEMENT WALL. 8 - Ø10mm spaced @ SOIL BACKFILL @ REAR 120mm O.C FACE OF THE WALL. 24 - Ø10mm spaced @ 120mm O.C 10 - Ø12mm 10 - Ø12mm spaced @100mm O.C spaced @100mm O.C TOE HEEL 17 - Ø10mm space @90mm O.C 17 - Ø10mm spaced @90mm O.C REVISION NO. DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE CHECKED DATE APPROVED
  • 7. Fig.1 Pressure Diagram induced by Seismic Force & Surcharge B d6 Weights and Forces: Consider 1.0 meter strip Weight due to concrete wall, W1 = ɣc*(h1-h)*b*t 17.400 KN Weight due to concrete footing, W2 = ɣc*L*b*h 15.360 KN Weight to soil backfill, W3 = ɣs*((L-t)/2)*(h1-h)*b 35.235 KN Reaction induced by slab @ the upper level, RB 5.863 KN Force induced by seismic, PAE = (0.375(kh)(γws)(h1)2) KN Force induced by surcharge load, Psur KN 14.702 7.569 CHECK FOR STABILITY FOR SEISMIC CONDITION A RB d5 d7 d2 d3 PAE Psur W1 W2 W3 L h d4 HEEL TOE Moment arm about toe: Moment arm for soil induced force, d7 = 2*h1/3 2200.00 mm Moment arm for surcharge force, d2 = h1/2 1650.00 mm Moment arm for force due to slab above level, d3 = h1 3300.00 mm Moment arm for soil backfill, d4 = L - (L-t)/4) 1262.50 mm Moment arm for wight concrete wall, d5 = L/2 800.00 mm Moment arm for weight of concrete footing, d6 L/2 800.00 mm Check for factor of safety as per code provision: Resisting Moment, RM = (RB*d3)+(W1*d5)+(W2*d6)+(W3*d4) 90.042 KN.m Overturning Moment, OM = (PAE*d1) + (Psur*d2) 44.832 KN.m Summation for vertical forces, Ry = W1 + W2 + W3 67.995 KN Check for factor of safety against sliding, FSSL = μ*(RY/(Psoil+Psur)) AASHTO 5.8.9.1A 2.07 Compliant NSCP II-Sec. 5.5.5 Thefore, Basement Retaining Wall is safe against sliding, Shear Key is not Needed AASHTO 5.8.9.1A Check for factor of safety against overturning, FSOT= RM/OM 2.01 Compliant NSCP II-Sec. 5.5.5 Therefore, Basement Retaining Wall is safe agaisnt overturning, section increase not needed