The Fair Elections Now Act would establish a public financing system for congressional elections to reduce the influence of large donors. It would provide matching funds for small donations to candidates and introduce a tax credit for small donors. Proponents argue this would amplify smaller voices and make elections more fair and representative.

1. (http://www.commoncause.org/assets/national-images/issue-
buckets/money-in-politics.jpg)
Senate Bill Seeks to Enhance Voices of All
Americans in our Democracy
Written by Joshua Barthel, Intern on June 11, 2015
Yesterday, Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) reintroduced the Fair Elections Now Act, a timely piece of legislation that
would dramatically improve how Congressional elections are funded. The disproportionate influence of large
donors is central to the growing conviction among voters that the Congressional election process is ultimately
unfair. 84 percent of donations to congressional candidates in the 2014 election were itemized
(http://www.demos.org/publication/dominance-big-money-2014-congressional-elections) contributions that
typically exceeded $200. As large donors increasingly drown out smaller ones, American democratic voices
become more and more unequal. Over a third (http://www.demos.org/publication/dominance-big-money-
2014-congressional-elections) of total contributions to Super PACs came from just 50 individuals. 2014 was a
watershed moment. The top 100 campaign donors gave nearly as much as 4.75 million small donors
combined (http://www.politico.com/story/2014/12/top-political-donors-113833.html). Clearly, big money
dominates while small donors are drowned out.
Home (/) > Democracy Wire (/democracy-wire/)
Like 715 Share Tweet

2. The Fair Elections Now Act would amplify the voices of those small donors. The bill would create new type of
small donor political action committee known as a “People PAC.” People PACs would only be able to accept
donations of $150 or less per election from individuals. Via the Fair Elections Fund, People PACs would then
be able to make campaign contributions of up to $5000 to candidates who qualify under the following Fair
Election provisions:
Participating candidates would first need to raise a minimum number and dollar amount of small-dollar
qualifying contributions from in-state donors and limit all donor contributions to $150.
In primary elections, candidates would receive a base grant depending on state population. They would also
receive a 6-to-1 match for small dollar donations up to a defined matching cap. All subsequent donor
contributions would be limited to $150.
In general elections, candidates would receive an additional grant for television advertising. Again, all
subsequent donor contributions would be limited to $150.
Senators Baldwin (D-WI), Boxer (D-CA), Brown (D-OH), Franken (D-MN), Gillibrand (D-NY), Heinrich (D-NM),
Klobuchar (D-MN), Leahy (D-VT), Markey (D-MA), McCaskill (D-MO), Menendez (D-OR), Merkley (D-OR),
Murphy (D-CT), Sanders (I-VT), Shaheen (D-NH), Udall, and Warren (D-MA) cosponsored this bill.
This bill would be effective because of its focus on the candidates themselves. With total spending in the 2014
election reaching nearly four billion dollars, most spending (42 percent
(https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/cost.php)) still went directly to candidates rather than parties or
outside organizations. Once elected, responsibility to act falls on them. Although admittedly a major step,
severing ties with special interest donations may be less painful than many expect.
Incentives for this legislation can be found on all sides, especially for members of Congress. The Fair Elections
Now Act would liberate legislators from the need to constantly chase around large donors and special interest
groups. As members of congress report daily schedules revolving around three to four hours of “call time”
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/08/call-time-congressional-fundraising_n_2427291.html) for
fundraising, this bill would help to restore congressional priorities to good governance rather than winning over
donors.
It is easy to understand why those priorities are currently so skewed. When big money has such a
disproportionate influence in overall donations, large donors are the ones evaluating Congress and deciding
who stays and who goes. In other words, they are doing the job that is supposed to be left to voters alone.
Returning power to small donors and ensuring fairer elections will help to restore public trust that has been
eroded by years of big money dominance.
By providing the framework for aspiring or current members of Congress to qualify as Fair Elections
candidates, this bill would give our public servants the opportunity to rise above the fray. The quid pro quo is
simple: candidates accept Fair Elections rules along with a more diverse and representative donor pool and
are in turn rewarded with higher credibility and a weight off of their shoulders once elected. This is a way for
Congress to become both more accountable and more efficient with its time.
With all of this focus on candidates, the Fair Elections Now Act is careful not to forget about small donors
themselves. With this group in mind, the bill also establishes a “My Voice Tax Credit” to encourage individuals
to contribute to campaigns. The bill sets a maximum refundable amount at $25 per individual and limits
participation to those who contribute less than $300 to a candidate or political party in a given year. This tax
credit will help to incentivize political participation in a crucial way. For those too busy or unable to spend
hours working on a political campaign, it is important to maintain an electoral system that keeps those $5
donations relevant. Under these provisions, the donor class would no longer be limited to the few with
economic power to shift election results. Rather, it would be a class to which everyone could belong.

3. The Fair Elections Now Act addresses several problematic aspects of our political system at once. It
simultaneously realigns the incentives of members of Congress and facilitates small donor participation.
Passage of this bill would be a critical step towards ensuring fairness and wider representation in
Congressional elections.
Office: Common Cause National (http://www.commoncause.org/democracy-wire/?
spstate_or_national=483903345)
Issues: Money in Politics (http://www.commoncause.org/democracy-wire/?spissue=486059254)
Tags: Empowering Small Donors (http://www.commoncause.org/democracy-wire/?spcampaign=517518088)
Leave a Comment
1 Comment Sort by
Melody Polson · Rancho High School
No private jets, no big parties with questionable behavior... I like it.
Like · Reply · 16 June 2015 10:54
Facebook Comments plug-in
Oldest
Add a comment...
All Issues (http://www.commoncause.org/democracy-wire/)
Money In Politics › (http://www.commoncause.org/democracy-wire/?
state_or_national=483903345&spstate_or_national=&spissue=486059254&spcampaign=&spVoting & Elections › (http://www.commoncause.org/democracy-wire/?
state_or_national=483903345&spstate_or_national=&spissue=486060669&spcampaign=&spEthics › (http://www.commoncause.org/democracy-wire/?
state_or_national=483903345&spstate_or_national=&spissue=486059962&spcampaign=&spMedia & Democracy › (http://www.commoncause.org/democracy-wire/?
state_or_national=483903345&spstate_or_national=&spissue=486060197&spcampaign=&spMore Democracy Reforms › (http://www.commoncause.org/democracy-wire/?
state_or_national=483903345&spstate_or_national=&spissue=486060452&spcampaign=&sp
Related Posts