This document provides a rubric for assessing a presentation given at the 3rd International E-Learning Conference at Walter Sisulu University in November 2011. The rubric evaluates how effectively the presentation was created in terms of the slides, text guidelines, and use of clip art and graphics, rather than the presentation content itself. It assessed a presentation on the use of information and communication technology by students and academics for teaching and learning at the University of Fort Hare. The presentation scored 15.8 out of 20 overall based on the criteria in the rubric.

1. Presentation Analysis Assessment Rubric
Erwin Exequiel Calata
The 3rd International E-Learning Conference at the Walter Sisulu University
November 01, 2011
Theme: Technology, Pedagogy and Education in the 21st Century
Presentation: the Use of ICT by Students and Academics in the Teaching and Learning: The case of the University of Fort Hare
Author: Alfred H. Makura
Disclaimer: The primary purpose of this presentation analysis assessment is to evaluate a presentation based how it was created not on the content of the presentation
itself. Considerations like effective presentation slides, text guidelines and clip arts and graphics was observed. Also I would like to acknowledge the author of the
presentation, Alfred H. Makura.
Exceptional
Full Point(s)
Very Good
< 0.9 Point(s)
Adequate
< 0.7 Point(s)
Fair
0.6 Point(s)
Poor
0.5 to 0 Point(s)
Total
Effective Presentation Slides
Use design templates (2 points) 0.5 0.5
Standardize position, colors and styles (2 points) 2 2
Conssistent with effects, transitions and animation (2 points) 2 2
Text Guidelines
Generally no more than 6 words a line (2 points) 0.7 0.7
Generally no more than 6 lines a slide (2 points) 0.7 0.7
Avoid long sentences (1 point) 0.9 0.9
Larger font indicates more important information (1 point) 1 1
Font size generally ranges from 18 to 48 point (2 points) 2 2
Text contrasts with background (2 points) 2 2
Clip Art and Graphics
Balance slide (1 point) 1 1
Enhance and complement text, not overwhelm (1 point) 1 1
No more than two graphics per slide (2 points) 2 2
Over all Presentation Score: 15.8