The document outlines a daily lesson log for Grade 12 students at Lingig National High School, detailing the objectives and standards for teaching quantitative research design. It includes a structured plan for lessons over five days, emphasizing the development of written research methodology skills. Additionally, it provides information on learning resources, teaching procedures, and reflective notes on student evaluation and teaching strategies.

1. DAILY
LESSON
LOG
School Lingig National High School Grade Level 12
Teacher RANEL D. BRIONES Learning Area PR2
Teaching Dates and Time Dec. 11-15, 2023 Set 1
MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY
I. OBJECTIVES
A. Content
Standards
Quantitative research design
B. Performance
Standards
describe adequately quantitative research designs, sample, instrument used, intervention (if applicable), data collection,
and analysis procedures
C. Learning
Competencies
with LC code
Presents written research methodology (CS_RS12-IIa-c-7)
1. Discuss the parts of chapter 3;
2. write and accomplish chapter 3;
3. appreciate how research methodology helps the researcher in making the data gathering order.
II. CONTENT
III. LEARNING
RESOURCES
A. References
1. Teacher’s
Guide pages

2. 2. Learner’s
Material pages
3. Textbook
pages
4. Additional
Materials from
learning
Resource (LR)
portal
B. Other Learning
Resources
TV, laptop, pentel pen, manila paper, illustration board, wifi modem, cellphones
IV. Procedures PRELIMINARIES
● Start with the following with a prayer and greetings
● Checking of attendance
● Setting the mood, and classroom standards
A. Reviewing
previous lesson
or presenting the
new lesson
MDL MDL MDL MDL MDL
B. Establishing a
purpose for the
lesson
C. Presenting
examples/
Instances of the
new lesson

3. D. Discussing new
concepts and
practicing new
skills #1
E. Continuation of
discussion of new
concepts leading
to formative
assessment
F. Developing
Mastery
(Leads to
formative
Assessment 3)
G. Finding practical
applications of
concepts and
skills in daily
living
a. Making
generalizations
and abstraction
about the lesson
b. Evaluating
learning
c. Additional
Activities for
application or
remediation

4. V. REMARKS
VI. REFLECTION
A. No. of learners who earned 80% in the evaluation.
B. No. of learners who require additional activities for remediation
C. Did the remedial lessons work? No. of learners who have caught up
with the lessons.
D. No. Learners who continue to require remediation
E. Which of my teaching strategies worked well? Why did this work?
F. What difficulties did I encounter which my principal or supervisor can
help me solve?
G. What innovation or localized materials did I used/discover which I
wish to share with other teachers?
Monitored and evaluated by: (12/10/23)
DR. WILLY C. DUMPIT, Ph.D.
Secondary School Principal -I