4. Overview
Cancers of oral cavity - 30% of head and neck
region tumors & 3% of all cancers
Lips - most commonly involved
90 % of oral cavity - cancers are moderately
differentiated squamus cell carcinoma
Oral cavity cancer - 11th most common
cancer in the world
15-Apr-18
5. Clinical Presentation
Non healing painless ulcer, painful in advanced stage
Ulcero proliferative or exophytic growth
Cervical lymphadenopathy
Trismus
Dysphagia, odynophagia
Bleeding from oral cavity
Distant mets – lungs, liver, bones, brain
15-Apr-18
6. Pre-treatment Workup
History and physical examination, complete
head and neck exam
Biopsy
CE-MRI and/or CECT face & neck
CT Chest
FDG PET-CT in stage III/IV
15-Apr-18
9. Treatment Goals
Cure
Preservation or restoration of form and
function
Minimize sequelae of treatment
15-Apr-18
10. Factors affecting choice of treatment
Tumor factor
Size
Site
Location
Depth of invasion
Grade
Previous treatment
Patient factor
Age
General condition
Performance status
Previous treatment
15-Apr-18
12. Treatment of Choice
Stage I and II : single modality treatment
(surgery or radiotherapy) is effective and
preferable
Stage III and IV : multimodal therapy is
essential
15-Apr-18
16. Surgical management
Most commonly treated with surgery in early stage
Successful treatment relies on effective management of
regional lymphatics as well as primary cancer
Elective neck surgery - in patient with clinically negative
neck node
Therapeutic neck dissection – clinically apparent nodal
disease
Early stage T1/2 No tumor : Wide excision +/ - ND
15-Apr-18
18. Surgical approach depends on
Tumor site- approximate with gingiva and periosteum, Marginal
mandibulectomy
Tumor extent- Rim Mandibulectomy
Sagittal mandibulectomy
Proximity to mandible or maxilla
Need for neck dissection
Need for reconstructive surgery
Marginal
mandibulectomy
Segmental
mandibulectomy 15-Apr-18
20. Radiotherapy alone
T1 and early T2 tumors
Combined approach – including EBRT and interstitial
brachytherapy is often recommended
The normal tissue toxicity may render radiation therapy a
less attractive option or single modality treatment
Sites- lip, floor of mouth, oral tongue
The outcome for advance lesion of the oral cavity (T3 and
T4) are less than satisfactory with either surgery or
radiation alone
15-Apr-18
21. Adjuvant (Post-op) RT
Aims :
To prevent local recurrence
To control occult disease in the cervical lymph nodes that were not
resected surgically
Indications :
-Presence of nodal disease with exptracapsular spread.
-Presence of involved surgical margin
-Excision margin less than 5 mm
-Stage III/IV
-Perineural or vascular invasion
-Poor differentiation
-Soft tissue invasion
-Mandibular bone involvement 15-Apr-18
22. Factors that determine adjuvant t/t
Adequacy of Surgery
Margin
Lymph nodes dissected
Gross & microscopic characteristics of the primary lesion
Gross & microscopic characteristics of dissected lymph
nodes
Patterns of spread
Frequency and pattern of lymph node involvement
15-Apr-18
23. Buccal Mucosa lesions
involve the buccinator
muscle and buccal fat pad
Alveolar and retromolar
trigone lesions involve bone
early;
Mandibular canal and
inferior alveolar nerve /
maxillary antrum and floor of
nose – potential routes &
sites of spread, respectively.
Bone Involvement :
Absence of fixation to bone /
small size of a mandibular
lesion, does not rule our
bone involvement.
ITF
Yao et al IJROBP 2007 :
55 pts, oral cancer alone
Mostly post-op IMRT
2/9 locoregional failures in ITF
15-Apr-18
24. Post op RT
RTOG 73-03 :
Locally advanced H & N cancers
Preop (50 Gy) vs Postop (60 Gy)
Oral cavity also had definitive RT arm (65-70 Gy) followed
by surgery if residual cancer
Head Neck Surg 1987;10:19-30
15-Apr-18
25. RTOG 73-03
277 patients
10 year follow-up
Improved locoregional control in post-op RT arm
(65%) vs. pre-op RT (48%, p=0.04)
Trend toward improved survival : 38% vs 33%, p=0.10)
Surgical and radiation therapy complications “similar”
IJROBP 1991;20:21-8.
15-Apr-18
26. RTOG 7303 established 60 Gy as post-op RT dose
MD Anderson performed prospective randomized trial
evaluating RT dose for 240 patients with resected stage
III/IV cancers of oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx,
larynx
180 cGy fractions
Dose ranged from 52.2 Gy to 68.4 Gy
IJROBP 1993; 26:3-11.
15-Apr-18
27. Patients receiving <54 Gy had significantly higher failure rate
No dose response beyond 57.6 Gy except for patients with
extracapsular nodal spread
ECE+ needed at least 63 Gy
“Clusters” which predicted increased risk of failure
oral cavity primary,
positive/close margins,
nerve invasion,
>2 positive nodes, largest node >3 cm,
treatment delay >6weeks,
Zubrod performance status>2
Moderate to severe complications seen in 7.1%; more if RT dose
>63 Gy
Dose escalation above 63 Gy “does not appear to improve the
therapeutic ratio”
15-Apr-18
28. Post-operative chemo-radiotherapy
Shift in the treatment paradigm
RTOG9501 and EORTC 22931 – all the patient with
resected head and neck cancer with positive margin
or extranodal extension should be assigned to
combined chemoradiation approach using concurrent
cisplatin
15-Apr-18
29. Patient Selection Criterion
EORTC 22931 only
EORTC 22931 and RTOG
9501 RTOG 9501 only
Stage III/IV disease
Surgical margins
microscopically involved
Two or more
positive lymph
nodes
Positive lymph nodes at
levels IV or V in patients
with tumors arising from
oropharynx or oral cavity
Extracapsular extension in
positive lymph nodes
Vascular embolisms
Perineural infiltration
15-Apr-18
30. Post op RT alone v/s
Post op RT + Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on weeks 1, 4 and 7
EORTC Trial - 334 patients were treated. There was a
significant benefit for 3 yr overall survival ( 61% v 49%)
DFS, LRC, and time to progression favoring the CRT
arm.
Although acute functional mucosal reactions were
worse in the CRT arm than the RT arm, there were no
differences seen in late toxicities.
RTOG 459 high risk patients - similar results
15-Apr-18
33. Techniques of RT
Carcinoma of the oral cavity - opposed lateral fields,
using either 2D or 3D CT-based techniques
During simulation and treatment patients are commonly
immobilized with a thermoplastic mask
Placed in supine position with a bite block (for oral
tongue and floor of mouth cases) to depress the tongue
away from the palate
15-Apr-18
34. . For patients with a short neck, the shoulders are
depressed by having the patient pull on a tensioning
device looped beneath the feet
Generally, the oral cavity tumor bed and upper echelon
lymph nodes are included within the initial lateral fields
The upper border of the field is positioned to provide a
1.5- to 2-cm border on the tumor bed
15-Apr-18
36. The inferior border - thyroid notch, just above the true vocal cords
The posterior border - mid-vertebral body level if level V nodal coverage is
not required
The nodal volume should include level Ia-Ib, II, and III
Advanced neck disease or risk of positive level V lymph nodes, where the
posterior chain requires radiation, the initial fields should be set behind
the C1 vertebral body spinous process
15-Apr-18
37. The portals are then reduced at approximately 45 Gy to spare
high dose to the spinal cord
If + ve cervical lymph node metastases, or high-risk disease, then
the lower neck will also be treated
In this case, a single half-beam-blocked anteroposterior field is
matched to the inferior border of the opposed lateral fields at the
level of the thyroid notch
An anterior larynx block is used, which protects not only the central
larynx from unnecessary radiation dose, but also protects against
spinal cord overdose due to three-field overlap
15-Apr-18
38. Megavoltage beams with an energy range between 4 and
6 MV are most suitable for treatment of cancers involving
the oral cavity
Cobalt-60 (similar average energy to that from 4 MV
linear accelerators) remains a very acceptable radiation
delivery unit for cancers in this region owing to the small
lateral separation distances in the head and neck area
When higher energy beams are used, bolus material
may be necessary to bring dose to the surface as
required for tumors that extend to the skin
15-Apr-18
39. Postoperative radiation the most common dose
fractionation is 1.8 to 2.0 Gy per day
Dissected tissues that harbored the original tumor should
generally receive on the order of 60 Gy
Close or positive microscopic margins or extracapsular
nodal extension, a 4 to 6 Gy localized boost should be
considered
Gross residual disease, either further surgical resection
or focal boosting up to 70 Gy is advisable
Low risk (i.e., clinically or pathologically uninvolved
necks) should receive on the order of 50 to 54 Gy 15-Apr-18
42. Immobilization
Cast is fixed to the couch top or base plate in at least 3
places
Mouth bite - pushes the tongue inferiorly when irradiating
the hard palate or upper alveolus and separate the roof of
the mouth from the inferior oral cavity when irradiating the
tongue
Pull the shoulders inferiorly
Anterior and lateral reference
marks made on the mould
15-Apr-18
43. Head and Neck Immobilization devices
3
Clamp
4
Clamp
5
ClampRandom Errors with different Fixation devices
Radiotherapy
15-Apr-18
49. IMRT in Oral Cavity
Ideal candidate
T1 to T4 lesion
< or = to N2b
IMRT may not be required for all patient T1-2/N0
as bulk of parotid glands can be excluded from
opposed lateral portals.
Patient with I/L +ve neck node IMRT may allow
dose limitation to C/L parotid gland
In B/L (N2c) neck disease its difficult to spare the
parotid gland
15-Apr-18
50. High risk CTV should include
Primary tumor bed( based on preoperative
imaging, physical examination, operative finding)
Grossly involved adenopathy
Intermediate risk CTV
Pathologically + ve hemineck
Nodal coverage for level I ,II, III, IV
Low risk CTV
The uninvolved low or c/l neck
15-Apr-18
52. CBCT (3 times/wk in 1 st week then 2 times/wk) or
Daily orthogonal portal images are implemented to
enhance daily set up reproducability
PTV expansion on CTV may be limited to 2 to 5 mm
based on set up errors of institution
Dose :
HR PTV – 60-66 Gy in @ Gy per fraction
Microscopically +ve margin or ECE - 64-66 Gy
IR PTV – 60 Gy
LR CTV- 50-54 Gy
15-Apr-18
53. Dose Limitation
Spinal cord max dose < 45 Gy
50% volume of each parotid < 20 Gy
Mean parotid dose <26 Gy
Mandible maximum (point dose) < 70 Gy
Larynx Mean < 40 Gy
Brain stem D Max < 54 Gy
15-Apr-18