POQ STUDIO
PLATFORM REPORT
First and Second Quarter 2014
Period
Participating clients
Q1 – Q2
17


DATA USED
Sessions
Transactions
Revenue
+45%
+174%
+111%
PLATFORM GROWTH Q1-Q2
0.00%!
0.50%!
1.00%!
1.50%!
2.00%!
2.50%!
January! February! March! April! May! June!
It’s	
  easy	
  to	
  see	
  the	
  
seasonality	
  of	
  retail	
  
here.	
  Most	
  retailers	
  go	
  
on	
  sale	
  in	
  January,	
  
triggering	
  higher	
  
conversion	
  rates.	
  Then	
  
the	
  low	
  period	
  in	
  
February	
  and	
  March	
  
creates	
  a	
  dip.	
  
Generally,	
  we	
  have	
  
seen	
  conversion	
  rates	
  
of	
  apps	
  on	
  the	
  Poq	
  
Studio	
  plaBorm	
  
increasing	
  year-­‐on-­‐year	
  
compared	
  to	
  Q2	
  2013	
  
by	
  more	
  than	
  50%.	
  This	
  
comes	
  from	
  maturing	
  
app	
  technologies.	
  	
  
CONVERSION RATES
Our data confirms what most industry research indicates, that
engagement on mobile apps is greater than mobile websites.!
	
  -­‐	
  	
  	
  	
  
	
  1.0	
  	
  
	
  2.0	
  	
  
	
  3.0	
  	
  
	
  4.0	
  	
  
	
  5.0	
  	
  
	
  6.0	
  	
  
	
  7.0	
  	
  
	
  8.0	
  	
  
	
  9.0	
  	
  
Mobile	
  Web	
   App	
  
Q1	
  
Q2	
  
APPS VS. MOBILE WEBSITES
SCREENS PER SESSION
Q1 !
2.82!
Q2!
2.99 !
The average time clients spend on mobile apps of the Poq platform!
has slightly increased from Q1 to Q2.!
!
ENGAGEMENT: AVERAGE TIME 











 

 
 
 
 
 
 
SPENT
31%!
69%!
NEW	
  USERS	
   RETURNING	
  USERS	
  
Being installed on a consumer’s phone and using push notification to re-engage

users are a significant advantages for apps, and are reasons why there is so
much return traffic. Retention is key for apps, as only apps that are 

useful to the consumer will have the consumer coming back.!
APP NEW VS RETURNING USERS
Q1 !
0.94% !
Q2 !
1.79%!
On average, retailers on the Poq Studio app platform saw a massive 90%
increase in their mobile app conversion rates. This can be partially
explained by retail seasonality, but also increasing app adoption by
consumers for shopping and maturing app technologies. !
QUARTERLY CONVERSION RATES
0.00%	
  
0.50%	
  
1.00%	
  
1.50%	
  
2.00%	
  
2.50%	
  
January	
   February	
   March	
   April	
   May	
   June	
  
Desktop	
  
App	
  
Mobile	
  
Web	
  
Data source: 1M Sessions across clients from January to June 2014!
CONVERSION APP VS WEB
 £-­‐	
  	
  
	
  £20	
  	
  
	
  £40	
  	
  
	
  £60	
  	
  
	
  £80	
  	
  
	
  £100	
  	
  
	
  £120	
  	
  
	
  £140	
  	
  
	
  £160	
  	
  
January	
   February	
   March	
   April	
   May	
   June	
  
Desktop	
  
App	
  
The data above shows that the average order value using an app is !
more in line with dektop than mobile, and is consistently higher than !
mobile web.!
Data source: 1M Sessions across clients from January to June 2014!
AVERAGE ORDER VALUE
APP,
24.06%!
MOBILE
WEB,
75.94%!
APP REVENUE (%) OF TRANSACTIONS VIA
SMARTPHONES
APP,
30.53%!
MOBILE
WEB,
69.47%!
Q1	
   Q2	
  
Transactions via smartphones gained 6% market share against mobile web!
sales between Q1 and Q2.!
!
MOBILE REVENUE SHARE
APP REVENUE (%) OF TRANSACTIONS VIA SMARTPHONES
0%	
  
5%	
  
10%	
  
15%	
  
20%	
  
25%	
  
30%	
  
35%	
  
40%	
  
January	
   February	
   March	
   April	
   May	
   June	
  
As you can see from the graph shown above, overall, app
revenue share has increased during the past two quarters!
MOBILE REVENUE SHARE
RETAILERS ON POQ STUDIO
!
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !

Platform Report Q1 and Q2

  • 1.
    POQ STUDIO PLATFORM REPORT Firstand Second Quarter 2014
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
    0.00%! 0.50%! 1.00%! 1.50%! 2.00%! 2.50%! January! February! March!April! May! June! It’s  easy  to  see  the   seasonality  of  retail   here.  Most  retailers  go   on  sale  in  January,   triggering  higher   conversion  rates.  Then   the  low  period  in   February  and  March   creates  a  dip.   Generally,  we  have   seen  conversion  rates   of  apps  on  the  Poq   Studio  plaBorm   increasing  year-­‐on-­‐year   compared  to  Q2  2013   by  more  than  50%.  This   comes  from  maturing   app  technologies.     CONVERSION RATES
  • 5.
    Our data confirmswhat most industry research indicates, that engagement on mobile apps is greater than mobile websites.!  -­‐          1.0      2.0      3.0      4.0      5.0      6.0      7.0      8.0      9.0     Mobile  Web   App   Q1   Q2   APPS VS. MOBILE WEBSITES SCREENS PER SESSION
  • 6.
    Q1 ! 2.82! Q2! 2.99 ! Theaverage time clients spend on mobile apps of the Poq platform! has slightly increased from Q1 to Q2.! ! ENGAGEMENT: AVERAGE TIME SPENT
  • 7.
    31%! 69%! NEW  USERS  RETURNING  USERS   Being installed on a consumer’s phone and using push notification to re-engage
 users are a significant advantages for apps, and are reasons why there is so much return traffic. Retention is key for apps, as only apps that are 
 useful to the consumer will have the consumer coming back.! APP NEW VS RETURNING USERS
  • 8.
    Q1 ! 0.94% ! Q2! 1.79%! On average, retailers on the Poq Studio app platform saw a massive 90% increase in their mobile app conversion rates. This can be partially explained by retail seasonality, but also increasing app adoption by consumers for shopping and maturing app technologies. ! QUARTERLY CONVERSION RATES
  • 9.
    0.00%   0.50%   1.00%   1.50%   2.00%   2.50%   January   February   March   April   May   June   Desktop   App   Mobile   Web   Data source: 1M Sessions across clients from January to June 2014! CONVERSION APP VS WEB
  • 10.
     £-­‐      £20      £40      £60      £80      £100      £120      £140      £160     January   February   March   April   May   June   Desktop   App   The data above shows that the average order value using an app is ! more in line with dektop than mobile, and is consistently higher than ! mobile web.! Data source: 1M Sessions across clients from January to June 2014! AVERAGE ORDER VALUE
  • 11.
    APP, 24.06%! MOBILE WEB, 75.94%! APP REVENUE (%)OF TRANSACTIONS VIA SMARTPHONES APP, 30.53%! MOBILE WEB, 69.47%! Q1   Q2   Transactions via smartphones gained 6% market share against mobile web! sales between Q1 and Q2.! ! MOBILE REVENUE SHARE
  • 12.
    APP REVENUE (%)OF TRANSACTIONS VIA SMARTPHONES 0%   5%   10%   15%   20%   25%   30%   35%   40%   January   February   March   April   May   June   As you can see from the graph shown above, overall, app revenue share has increased during the past two quarters! MOBILE REVENUE SHARE
  • 13.
    RETAILERS ON POQSTUDIO ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !