POLS Terms to Be Reviewed. Agenda SettingPoli.docx

•Download as DOCX, PDF•

0 likes•2 views

POLS Terms to Be Reviewed. Agenda Setting Policy Formation Policy Implementation Cesar Chavez/ United Farm Workers Politics Political Culture Bill of Rights Brown v. Board of Education Civil Rights Acts 1964 Voting Rights Act of 1965 Political Socialization Agents of Political Socialization Judicial Review Federalism Federalists/ Anti-Federalists Bush v. Gore National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelious “Occupy Wall Street” Roe v. Wade “Tea Party” “Two-Fifths Compromise” American Political Development Gideon v. Wainwright Plessy v. Ferguson Cabinet Departments “Jacksonian Democracy” The Progressives Civil War/ Abraham Lincoln Executive Office of the President National Security Council “Imperial Presidency” Cuban Missile Crisis The Office of Management and Budget Reies Lopez Tijerina Chicanismo President as “First Legislator” Committees (in U.S. Congress) Conference Committee Committee Hearing Reapportionment Filibuster Floor (U.S. Congress) “Kitchen Cabinet” Party System Conventional/ unconventional forms of political participation Pluralism Interest Group Lobbyist Party Identification Party System Gerrymander Political Action Committee Incumbency advantage Who elects the Justices of the Supreme Court (D.C. and California)? Functions of the Governor of California Assembly in California Senate in California The “Seven Executives” in California Number of Justices of the U.S. Supre Court/Supreme Court of California Electoral College/Number of Electors per state. .

Cabinet Departments
“Jacksonian Democracy”
The Progressives
Civil War/ Abraham Lincoln
Executive Office of the President
National Security Council
“Imperial Presidency”
Cuban Missile Crisis
The Office of Management and Budget
Reies Lopez Tijerina
Chicanismo
President as “First Legislator”
Committees (in U.S. Congress)
Conference Committee
Committee
Hearing
Reapportionment
Filibuster
Floor (U.S. Congress)
“Kitchen Cabinet”
Party System
Conventional/
unconventional forms of political participation
Pluralism
Interest Group
Lobbyist
Party Identification
Party System
Gerrymander
Political Action Committee
Incumbency advantage
Who elects the Justices of the Supreme Court (D.C. and
California)?
Functions of the Governor of California
Assembly in California
Senate in California

The “Seven Executives” in California
Number of Justices of the U.S. Supre Court/Supreme Court of
California
Electoral College/Number of Electors per state.

1 POLS 155 Key Terms Note: Here are key terms that everybody should know for the final. I provide these to help you study, since this list covers much of the important content and concepts of the course. Please note though that this list is not exclusive and there may be other words or concepts on the exam as well. Ch1 & 2 (Exam 1) political efficacy liberty, equality, democracy limited government popular sovereignty majority rule minority rights Declaration of Independence Articles of Confederation federalism, unitary system, confederation Shays’s Rebellion Annapolis Convention Philadelphia Convention Great Compromise Virginia Plan New Jersey Plan Three-fifths Compromise bicameral, unicameral excessive democracy checks and balances separation of powers 17th Amendment expressed powers/enumerated powers implied powers necessary and proper clause (elastic clause) electoral college judicial review full faith and credit clause privileges and immunities clause (comity clause) supremacy clause Federalists, Anti-Federalists Ch3 & 4 (Exam 2) reserved powers 10th Amendment police power concurrent powers home rule McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) 2 Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) commerce clause dual federalism, cooperative federalism, regulated federalism, new federalism grants-in-aid block grants categorical grants unfunded mandates devolution civil liberties civil rights Bill of Rights Barron v. Baltimore (1833) dual citizenship Fourteenth Amendment selective incorporation eminent domain First Amendment freedom of religion establishment clause free exercise clause freedom of speech absolutely protected speech political speech symbolic speech speech plus rights of assembly and petition libel slander obscenity/pornography fighting words commercial speech Second Amendment Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule Mapp v. Ohio (1961) due process Fifth Amendment grand jury double jeopardy self-incrimination Miranda rule Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Sixth Amendment Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) Eighth Amendment right to privacy 3 Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) Roe v. Wade (1973) Bowers vs. Hardwick (1986) Lawrence v. Texas (2003) Ch5 & 8 (Exam 3) Thirteenth Amendment Fifteenth Amendment equal protection clause (Fourteenth Amendment) due process clause (Fourteenth Amendment) Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) separate but equal rule Jim Crow National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAAC) Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954) de jure de facto Little Rock crisis (Central High School, Little Rock) Montgomery bus boycott Martin Luther King Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) March on Washington Civil Rights Act, 1964 24th Amendment Voting Rights Act, 1965 affirmative action Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 1978 Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) California Proposition 209 (1996) ...

Civil Rights

Christopher Rice

Chapter6tonybartl

The Judicial Branch | The US Supreme Court

Aquinas College Economics Department

US political system

Jose Pablo Quiros A

Running Head PRE AND POST VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965PRE AND POST.docx

glendar3

Running Head: PRE AND POST VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 PRE AND POST VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965 14 Title Samarea Price Savannah State University 28 February 2019 Literature Review Pre-Voting Rating Act According to Bestor (1964), the founding constitution of the United States did not regard black people as human beings at all, so there was no way to talk about the right to vote at that time. During the American Civil War, President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, announcing that all slaves were free. Before the Civil War, the Supreme Court in the Scott decision that caused a serious constitutional crisis had explained that the Constitution made black people the private property of slave owners and was inalienable (Bestor, 1964). Therefore, President Lincoln’s order to liberate slaves seems to violate the spirit of the Constitution. Interestingly, the Supreme Court Justices, who were with Lincoln in the capital, Washington, closed their eyes, and even Chief Justice Roger Tenny, who wrote the Scott’s verdict, did not boo and did not dare to defend constitution (Issacharoff, 1992). According to Lawson (2003), President Lincoln’s announcement of this order was only symbolic at the time, and it was a propaganda campaign to disintegrate the enemy’s rear. After the end of the Civil War, Congress enacted Article 13 of the Constitutional Amendment in 1865, abolishing slavery, which really liberated slaves in law. In 1868, Article 14 of the Constitutional Amendment was enacted to give the identity of a black American citizen (In Robinson & In Sullivan, 1991). However, Article 14 of the amendment does not address racial discrimination in the right to vote. To this end, Congress passed the 15th amendment in 1870, which clearly states: “The Government of the United States or any state government may not refuse because of race, color, or previous service. Giving or depriving the citizens of the United States of the right to vote." (In Robinson & In Sullivan, 1991)……………. So, in theory, black Americans won the right to vote in 1870. but it is not the truth. Under the US federal system, many functions of the government are the responsibility of the state government (In Robinson & In Sullivan, 1991). Before the introduction of the US Voting Rights Act in 1965, the specific provisions of the voting were formulated by the state governments, and the federal government could not intervene. Although the Constitution stipulates that the right to vote cannot be deprived of race and color, the states, especially the law-making institutions of the southern states, have changed the law to deprive blacks of the right to vote. These laws that deprive black people of their right to vote are mainly based on prerequisite to voting. If you have to meet certain property requirements, pay taxes, pass cultural examinations, etc., you can register voters (In Robinson & In Sulliv.

Running Head PRE AND POST VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965PRE AND POST.docx

todd581

Unit 5 judicial branch academicFredrick Smith

Running Head: Week Two Annotated Bibliography Worksheet 1 Week Two Annotated Bibliography Worksheet 3 Week Two Annotated Bibliography Worksheet Keisha Thomas POL201 American National Government Mark Ladd August 20, 2018 Topic: The Civil Rights Movement of 1964. In 1964, the Civil Rights Act ended segregation in public places banning employment discrimination that was based on national origin, sex, religion, race or color. This is considered as one of the most crowning achievements as far as civil right movements are concerned. Despite the strong opposition from the southerners, it was signed into law by Lyndon B. Johnson who succeeded Kennedy. The topic is important to address since it played a vital role in the removal of the procedures and registration requirements that were biased against the underprivileged and minorities (Davis, 2016). Moreover, it also called for the nondiscrimination in fund distributions, public school desegregation as well as the broadening of Civil Rights Commission duties (Percy, 2018). A. Source 1 Brown, R. L. (2017). Accountability, liberty, and the Constitution. In Bills of Rights (pp. 49-98). Routledge. In his article Brown (2017) asserts that political accountability in constitutional theory has been misunderstood. This has led to the contribution of the model that places majority rule at the center of constitutional legitimacy requiring special justification for departures. The model offers the start point for much of the modern constitutional theory in the sense that judicial review is branded as a “deviant” institution. History suggests that in America, representation was not designed as a means of people to take part in government but rather as a means for people protecting themselves from the representative government of their own. This explains the reason why people understand the principle of political accountability as a way to protect themselves. People are allowed to check abuse of power as well as overseeing a political structure. B. Source 2 Rosenbloom, D. H. (2016). 3a. Public Administrative Theory and the Separation of Powers. In The Constitutional School of American Public Administration (pp. 78-94). Routledge. In public administration, there has been an experience of absent or weak theoretical core (Rosenbloom, 2016). The paper found out that the main problem affecting the public administrative theory emanates from three disparate approaches as to what public administration really is. These approaches are labeled “legal,” “managerial,” and “political”. On public administration, they influence each other in the sense that they overlap following the pattern of the constitutional separation of powers. These approaches are not likely to be synthesized without having to violate the values ingrained deeply in the U.S culture of politics (Rosenbloom, 2016). C. Source 3 Pettit, B., & Sykes, B. L. (2015). Civil rights legislation and legalized exclusion: Mass incarceration and the masking of ine.

1.11.24 Movement Mythologies and the Legacies of Reconstruction .pptx

MaryPotorti1

Civil libertiesjonathanmpowell

Civil libertiesnewguest69d991

Civil Liberties & Rightsjonathanmpowell

Civil libertiesjonathanmpowell

barbour3David Woodard

Civil Rightsmandrewmartin

kevin_mcmahon_power_point_slidesguestfbf1e1

Civil Rights—RaceKacee Garner

Wilson Ch18 19rcambou

Policy Research PaperResearch and write a 5 page academic .docx