MSc Ag Genetics & Plant Breeding: Insights from Previous Year JNKVV Entrance ...
Points of difference between om and kinect
1. Points of Difference to Kinect
Kinect
• Relaying on interpretation and predictive algorithms
to determine the most probably upcoming pose
• Contains a large number of preloaded poses
• Each detected area in the scan space is matched
with a potential body part and assigned the
probability that it actually matches such body part
• Based on those probabilities, Kinect comes up with
the most probably skeleton building on its
experience and preprogrammed kinematics models.
This skeleton is then outfitted as a 3D avatar.
1
2. Points of Difference to Kinect
Features Kinect Organic Motion
Speed 30fps – does not track well Adjustable from 30 to 200 fps
fast moves to track
Accuracy Low – Not a real 3d motion High – In the mm range
tracking technology.
Full 3D tracking No, it is based in predictive Yes, provides full 3D real time
algorithms data
Bone Sizing Approximation Accurate
Foot tracking Unknown Yes
Fingers Tracking Unknown No
Head Tracking Limited Yes
Biomechanics applications No Yes
360 view No Yes
Latency 250 millisecs 50 millisecs
Resolution 640x480 640x480
# of people More than 2 More than 2
Scanning area 1.2–3.5 m Scalable, up to 10m by 10m
2
