Call Girls South Delhi Delhi reach out to us at ☎ 9711199012
Piotrowski hypoxia task force
1. IMPLEMENTING STATE
NUTRIENT STRATEGIES
WE NEED YOUR HELP!
Website: www.epa.gov/msbasin
Soil & Water Conservation Society
Tuesday, June 29, 2014
3:30pm – 5:00pm
Presented by:
Joe Piotrowski – US EPA
Kimberlyn Velasquez – US EPA
Rebecca Power – University of WI Extension
Chad Watts – CTIC
2. N & P pollution is becoming one of America’s costliest and most challenging
environmental problems
Over the last 50 years, the amount of nitrogen and phosphorus entering our
waters has escalated dramatically.
N&P Pollution: Scope of the Problem
3. USGS Nutrients in the Nation’s Streams and Groundwater September 2010
report found that:
50% of U.S. streams have medium to high levels of nitrogen and phosphorus
78% of assessed coastal waters exhibit eutrophication
Nitrate drinking water violations have doubled in eight years
N&P Pollution: Scope of the Problem
N&P pollution can hurt the tourism
industry, decimate people’s property
values, and cause illnesses
The Gulf is critical to the national
economy and provides some of the
nation’s most valuable fisheries.
Estimated dead zone costs per
year to seafood & tourism
industries: $82 Million (NOAA)
4. Today’s Session
Intro on Hypoxia and the
Hypoxia Task Force (HTF)
Getting Results Through Nutrient
Strategies and Priority
Watersheds
Land Grant University
Partnership
Examples of activities for
increasing nutrient efficiency
Questions
Closing & Takeaways
Source: NASA
5. Excess Nutrient Delivery to the Gulf
Source: Robertson and Saad, 2013
Total Nitrogen Total Phosphorus
8. • US Army Corps of Engineers
• US Environmental Protection Agency
• US Department of Agriculture
• US Geological Survey
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
• National Tribal Water Council
5 Federal Agencies and Tribes:
12 State Agencies:
• Arkansas
• Missouri
• Iowa
• Tennessee
• Minnesota
• Indiana
• Ohio
• Louisiana
• Illinois
• Mississippi
• Kentucky
• Wisconsin
Each state is represented by either:
Agriculture agency , Environment (pollution control) agency, or
Natural Resources agency
The Hypoxia Task Force
Mississippi River Basin
HTF States
9. HTF Focus: State Nutrient Strategies
• Prioritize watersheds based on
N&P
• Set watershed load reduction
goals
• Control Ag. runoff
• Control point source pollution
• Implement accountability and
verification measures
• Submit progress reports
• Develop work plan and schedule
for numeric nutrient criteria
development
1. Indiana
2. Iowa
3. Louisiana
4. Minnesota
5. Mississippi
6. Ohio
7. Tennessee
8. Wisconsin
9. Kentucky
Recommended Strategy
Framework
9 States Have Complete or Draft
Strategies
11. HTF Federal Nutrient Strategy
• Monitoring and modeling to help
demonstrate progress
• Research on the impacts and
relationship between nutrients and
hypoxia
• Targeting of conservation practices
and economic analysis of their benefits
• Development of technical tools to help
planners and conservationists make
informed decisions
• Expanding outreach and partnerships
with organizations sharing similar goals
and interests
Federal Efforts to Support States
12. EPA Tools Available to You
Community Outreach
Toolkit
How's My Waterway
Discharge Monitoring
Report Pollutant Loading
Tool
Nitrogen and Phosphorus
Pollution Data Access Tool
Water Quality Data
Portal
16. Expanding Partnerships to Implement State
Nutrient Reduction Strategies
Increase understanding of issues
Partner with states in priority watersheds
Identify opportunities for progress
We Need Your Help!
17. Questions For Us To Consider
Does the state priority watershed approach resonate
with you as a rallying point for federal, state, and
other stakeholder efforts?
What are you already doing, if anything, to
collaborate on the development of state nutrient
strategies?
What could the HTF as a whole do to better engage
you as a partner - either formally or informally?
18. Questions for You
What are you doing to collaborate on a larger watershed
scale - nutrient management research or implementation?
What could we on the Hypoxia Task Force do to strengthen
your organization's connection with your state's HTF member
agency, related to state nutrient strategy development? Are
there any barriers that need to be addressed?
How can your organization help with state nutrient strategy
implementation? Research, monitoring, outreach, education,
etc.
19. Today’s Takeaways…
Together, The 12 HTF States and 5 federal Agencies
have a plan that we think will work
We have begun to enlist partners, starting with the Land
Grant Universities
We want to, no NEED TO,
enlist more partners to help in
many different disciplines if
we hope to accelerate
conservation efforts that need
to occur.
20. Today’s Takeaways…
Some of the Help we can Use
University staff can help by:
• Getting the word out on economically feasible tools, techniques, BMPs and nutrient reduction
techniques
• Providing nutrient BMP information to Crop Advisors
• Assisting local stakeholders with implementing promising BMPs in priority watersheds (e.g. cover
crops, bioreactors)
Corporations can help by:
• Supporting the development of local stakeholder groups where they don’t yet exist
• Financial and technical with implementing a watershed plan where one does exist
NGOs can help by:
• Considering whether in the future you believe it makes sense to align with an approach that has
significant state and federal backing
• Adopting high priority watersheds & developing watershed plans that reduce nutrients
Everyone can help by:
• Connecting with your HTF state agency(s) & researching your state nutrient strategy
• Staying on top of HTF activities and progress (e.g., Alton meeting)
21. THANK YOU!
WE LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU
Website: www.epa.gov/msbasin
For More Information Contact:
USEPA, Hypoxia Task Force Team
Joe Piotrowski – Piotrowski.Joe@epa.gov
Kimberlyn Velasquez – Velasquez.Kimberlyn@epa.gov
Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC)
Chad Watts – Watts@ctic.org
University of Wisconsin-Extension
Rebecca Power – Rlpower@wisc.edu