CURRENT ACCOUNT CONVERTIBILITY OF INDIAN

                            RUPEES

                                   A

                   PROJECT REPORT


                Submitted to the faculty of Management

         In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of




        Post Graduate Diploma

                                  In

                   Foreign Trade



        SINHGAD BUSINESS SCHOOL

                                                          SUBMITTED BY

                                                     MANISH NAGAR

                                                     PGDFT II SEM

                                                         SBS - 110004



1
`

                            CERTIFICATE




This is to certify that the project entitled “CURRENT ACCOUNT

CONVERTIBILITY OF INDIAN RUPEES” has been carried out by

MANISH NAGAR under my guidance in partial fulfillment of the requirement

for the degree of Post Graduate Diploma In Foreign Trade during academic year

2011-2012.




    GUIDE                                                   DIRECTOR


Mrs. Prashant pawar                                        Mrs. M.S.Sathe

                                      .




2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT


      I take this opportunity to express my deep sense of gratitude and indebt-
ness to Mrs.prashant pawar under whose able guidance the present work has
been completed. I am very thankful devotion of help and Suggestions.


         I am also thankful to my whole teacher staff for their direct indirect
support to me.




                                                                Manish nagar




3
Index
Sr.                                                            pg.no
No.

1     Introduction                                                   5

2     Convertibility why?                                            7

3     What does current account convertibility means?                8

4     Types of convertibility                                   9

5     Types of accounts                                              13

6     Impacts of current and capital account convertibility          14

7     Benefits of current and capital account convertibility         16

8     Convertibility on Current Account                              19

9     Current Situation on Current Account                           21

10    Path that lead to Current Account Convertibility          22

11    Necessary reforms, policies and pre-conditions                 29

12    Limitations                                                    48

13    Conclusion                                                     49



4
Introduction




      Each country has its own currency through which both national and

international transactions are performed. All the international business

transactions involve an exchange of one currency for another. For example, If

any Indian firm borrows funds from international financial market in US dollars

for short or long term then at maturity the same would be refunded in particular

agreed currency along with accrued interest on borrowed money. It means that

the borrowed foreign currency brought in the country will be converted into

Indian currency, and when borrowed fund are paid to the lender then the home

currency will be converted into foreign lender’s currency. Thus, the currency

units Of a country involve an exchange of one currency for another. The price

of one currency in terms of other currency is known as exchange rate.

      The foreign exchange markets of a country provide the mechanism of

exchanging different currencies with one and another, and thus, facilitating

transfer of purchasing power from one country to another. With the multiple

growths of international trade and finance all over the world, trading in foreign

currencies has grown tremendously over the past several decades. Since the

exchange rates are continuously changing, so the firms are exposed to the risk

of exchange rate movements. As a result the assets or liability or cash flows of a


5
firm which are denominated in foreign currencies undergo a change in value

over a period of time due to variation in exchange rates. This variability in the

value of assets or liabilities or cash flows is referred to exchange rate risk. Since

the fixed exchange rate system has been fallen in the early 1970s, specifically in

developed countries, the currency risk has become substantial for many

business firms. As a result, these firms are increasingly turning to various risk

hedging products like foreign currency futures, foreign currency forwards,

foreign currency options, and foreign currency swaps. Convertibility

essentially means the ability of residents and non-residents to

exchange domestic currency for foreign currency, without limit,

whatever is the purpose of the transactions.




6
Convertibility: why?



Externally inconvertible currencies may be of rather limited value to their

holder. An exported item from a developing country to the USSR, for example,

may be paid for in rubles or the currency of a country that has ratified Article

VIII.   The   proceeds    may    be   used    to   purchase   goods    anywhere.

In considering possible import suppliers, therefore, a developing country will

have some interest in directing its importers to those countries that will have

some interest in directing its importers to those countries whose inconvertible

currencies are in large supply. This is, of course, a case of trade discrimination

that is condemned by traditional theory. This means that goods are not being

purchased from the cheapest source. Recent economic writing has, however,

reopened the question in view of the continued existence of inconvertible

currencies. Where it is profitable on the export side to trade with countries

maintaining inconvertible currencies, and the government wishes to encourage

imports from those countries to offset its credit balances, it will utilize its

exchange distribution mechanism to limit the availability of convertible

exchange where there are alternative suppliers of the same type of goods in

inconvertible currency countries.




7
What exactly does current account convertibility of rupee means?



      Current Account Convertibility means that rupee can now be freely

convertible into any foreign currencies for acquisition of assets like shares,

properties and assets abroad. Further, the banks can accept deposits in any

currency. At present, Indian rupee was partly convertible on current account. It

provided flexibility to buy or sell foreign exchange for specific activities like

payments for trade related activities, interest payments, remittances, business

expenses etc. Further, an individual was allowed to buy shares worth $ 25,000

per anumn only. India has come a long way from the FERA, 1947 to FERA,

1973 and now to FEMA, 2000. It has seen the days from non-convertibility of

money to partial convertibility of money. Now, after the instructions from the

PM, the finance minister Mr. P. Chidambaram said that RBI and centre shall

announce steps for greater convertibility of rupee. This reform shall mean a lot

for our country’s development and growth plus it shall mark a new era in terms

of globalization and liberalization. For an economy which was so close, such a

step is indeed a landmark – a mile stone achieved.




8
Types of convertibility




9
Current account convertibility

Current account is defined as including the value of trade in merchandise,

services, investment, income and unilateral transfers. Current account

convertibility, being essential to the development of multilateral trade, three

approaches to current account convertibility has been adapted by developing

countries. These are the pre-announcement, by-product, and front-loading

approaches. Each approach is distinguished by the importance it attaches to

convertibility relative to other economic objectives.



Capital account convertibility



Capital account includes transactions of financial assets. Its convertibility refers

to the freedom to convert local financial assets into foreign assets in any form

and vice versa at market-determined rates of exchange. Capital controls

normally restrict or prohibit cross-border movement of capital. Thus, controls

on capital movements include prohibitions: need for prior approval;

authorization and notification; multiple currency practices; discriminatory taxes;

and reserve requirements or interest penalties imposed by the authorities that

regulate the conclusion or execution of transactions. The coverage of the

regulations would apply to receipts as well as payments and to actions initiated

by non-residents and residents.



10
To begin with let’s understand the concept of currency convertibility. Currency

convertibility may be defined as the freedom to convert one currency into other

internationally accepted currencies. Thus in a CAG regime the country places

no exchange controls or restrictions on foreign exchange transactions. There are

two forms of convertibility – convertibility for current international transactions

and the convertibility for international capital movements. While India is still to

opt for full Capital Account Convertibility, the government has made the rupee

convertible on the current account. This implies that companies and resident

Indians can make and receive payments for import/export of goods and services

and be able to access foreign currency for travel, education, medical or other

designated purposes. Though there is no formal definition of CAC, the Tarapore

Committee provides some clarity in this regard as it defines the same as - the

freedom to convert local financial assets into foreign financial assets and vice

versa at market determined rates of exchange. In other words, Capital account

convertibility means that the home currency can be freely converted into foreign

currencies for acquisition of capital assets abroad. Thus, implementation of the

capital account convertibility regime will allow Indian residents to invest,

disinvest or transact in any property or assets/liability of any country, convert

one currency to another or move funds anywhere in the world, solely guided by

discretion of the concern individual or company & not restricted by law.




11
External and internal convertibility



when all holdings of the currency by non-residents are freely exchangeable into

any foreign (non- resident) currency at exchange rates within the official

margins than that currency is said to be externally convertible. All payments

that residents of the country are authorized to make to non-residents may be

made in any externally convertible currency that residents can buy in foreign

exchange markets. And if there are no restrictions on the ability of a country to

use their holdings of domestic currency to acquire any foreign currency and

hold it, or transfer it to any nonresident for any purpose, that country’s currency

is said to be internally convertible. Thus external convertibility is the partial

convertibility and total convertibility is the sum of external and internal

convertibility.




TYPES OF ACCOUNTS:


12
Current Account:

      A record of all international transactions for goods and services. The

current account combines the transactions of the trade account and the services

account. Merchandise Trade Account: A record of all international transactions

for goods only. Goods include physical items like autos, steel, food, clothes,

appliances, furniture, et al




Services Account:

A record of all international transactions for services only. Services include

transportation, insurance, hotel, restaurant, legal services, Consulting, et al




13
Impacts of current and capital account convertibility



Impact on corporate sector

However, it is interesting to note the impact which such free flow of currency

would have on Indian corporate. In the last two–three years we have been

witnessing the growing phenomena of India Inc. being on the acquisition spree

abroad. In 2002 while Indian companies acquired 49 companies the same has

grown to around 100 with total money used for the same increasing from US $

1800 mn to US $ 2300 mn during the same period. The trend which was earlier

restricted to certain sectors like information technology has now spread across

the industries whether it is automobile, pharmaceuticals, auto-ancillary, ITES

(IT Enabled Services) and so on. In the overseas markets Indian companies are

buying out even bigger size companies in order to become a globally efficient

company and thus tackle the global competition successfully. Also The

acquisition drive in 2005 was not restricted to traditional US and UK but Indian

companies went to countries as diverse as Australia, Romania, Germany,

Bulgaria, South Africa etc. Ushering of CAC regime would facilitate the

process of globalization of India Inc. as a whole. This is because so far Indian

companies have been predominantly utilizing the proceeds from the overseas

issues like ECB (External Commercial Borrowing), FCCB (Foreign Currency

Convertible Bonds) to finance their overseas buyout. However, this indirect



14
route has been delaying the actual acquisition process and the consequent

integration of the acquired entity with the rest of the business of the acquiring

company. But if there no restriction on foreign currency availability for Indian

company then it would substantially boost their financial flexibility. They can

expedite the process of International acquisition once the target company is

identified. Thus, overseas buy outs would be very fast and efficient which in

turn would reduce the time period required to enjoy benefit of the acquisition

done.



Increasing globalization

Making the overseas acquisition hassle free would also provide an impetus to

the entire process of Indian companies truly becoming global size with more

number of companies opting for it which were restrained so far due to limited

access to international funds. In fact this could be high time for Indian

government to speed up the CAC reforms since there are several US companies

going bankrupt in the recent months whereas Indian companies has not taken

the advantage of it so far. Thus creation of more conducive environment & free

exchange of currencies would create a policy background which would enable

Indian companies to acquire overseas companies more aggressively going

forward.



Benefits of current and capital account convertibility
15
Apart from the above mentioned benefits Indian corporate sector would also

enjoy certain benefits in the long term. In this entire procedure companies with

high focus on exports & globalization would benefit immensely. Thus the top

rung companies from the software, textile, pharma, auto, auto components

industries having growing and substantial export revenues would have added

advantage. This is due to the fact that it would result into hassle free movement

of the currencies which would ensure that they can more efficiently utilize the

overseas earnings. Also this will simplify the investment diversification process

for Indian companies as they will have greater choice of parking their surplus

funds with global investment venues at their disposal. So not only Indian

citizens but corporate India will also have wider investment options and can

spread their investment across various countries.




OVERVIEW OF THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKET IN INDIA


16
During the early 1990s, India embarked on a series of structural reforms in the

foreign exchange market. The exchange rate regime, that was earlier pegged,

was partially floated in March 1992 and fully floated in March 1993. The

unification of the exchange rate was instrumental in developing a market-

determined exchange rate of the rupee and was an important step in the progress

towards total current account convertibility, which was achieved in August

1994. Although liberalization helped the Indian forex market in various ways, it

led to extensive fluctuations of exchange rate. This issue has attracted a great

deal of concern from policy-makers and investors. While some flexibility in

foreign exchange markets and exchange rate determination is desirable,

excessive volatility can have an adverse impact on price discovery, export

performance, sustainability of current account balance, and balance sheets. In

the context of upgrading Indian foreign exchange market to international

standards, a well- developed foreign exchange derivative market (both OTC as

well as Exchange-traded) is imperative With a view to enable entities to manage

volatility in the currency market, RBI on April 20, 2007 issued comprehensive

guidelines on the usage of foreign currency forwards, swaps and options in the

OTC market. At the same time, RBI also set up an Internal Working Group to

explore the advantages of introducing currency futures. Current Account




17
It refers to currency convertibility required in the case of transactions relating to

exchange of goods and services, money transfers and all those transactions that

are classified in the current account.



In Short, Current account includes all transactions, which give rise to or use of

our National income



Current Account Transactions

All imports and exports of merchandise

Invisible Exports and Imports (sale/purchase of services Inward private

remittances (to & fro)

Pension payments (to & fro)

Government Grants (both ways)




18
Convertibility on Current Account



India is fully convertible on the current account A full convertibility means

movement of funds in & out of India without any restrictions &

permissions.Provides full freedom to both residents and non-residents to trade

in goods/services. RBI has placed a cap in creation of a capital asset In India,

most current account transactions have been freed from controls over the years.



Current account convertibility refers to freedom in respect of Payments and

transfers for current international transactions. In other words, if Indians are

allowed to buy only foreign goods and services but restrictions remain on the

purchase of assets abroad, it is only current account convertibility.

Liberalization of current account transactions leading to current account

convertibility a compositional shift in capital flows away from debt- to non-

debt-creating flows strict regulation of external commercial borrowings,

especially short-term debt discouraging volatile elements of flows from

nonresident Indians gradual liberalization of outflows disintermediation of the

government in the flow of external assistance Introducing a market-determined

exchange rate regime




19
Dual exchange rate system


Liberalised Exchange Rate Management System involving dual exchange rate

system was instituted in March 1992 The dual exchange rate system was

essentially a transitional stage leading to the ultimate convergence of the dual

rates made effective from March 1, 1993 Two rates of exchange: Official rate of

exchange & Market rate of exchange 60% of the export earnings could be

converted at the free market determined     rate. (which was around Rs.28) The

balance 40% of the earnings should be sold to RBI through authorised dealers

at the Official rate of exchange. (generally higher at Rs.32)




Full convertibility of the current account


This unification of exchange rates brought about the era of market determined

exchange. Rate regime of rupee, based on demand and supply in the forex

market.Liberalize the access to foreign exchange for all current business

transactions including travel, education, medical expenses, etc.Under Article

VIII of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement in August 1994.




20
Current Situation on Current Account


India is fully convertible on the current accountProvides full freedom to both

residents and non-residents to trade in goods/services. RBI has placed a cap in

creation of a capital asset




21
Path that lead to Current Account Convertibility




Economists understand that capital mobility, fixed exchange rates and interest

rates autonomy cannot exist together in any economy. The effects of monetary

and fiscal policy in an open economy depend on capital mobility. Under

floating exchange rates, monetary policy is a powerful tool for policy.

Developing countries that seek to manage all three of the ingredients through

policy often attempt (like India) to adopt a ‘moving peg’ system that corrects

exchange rates through a series of time lagged steps. The problem in this

22
approach is that the central bank (the RBI, for example) has to intervene

periodically in the market to buy or sell dollars to prop up the current exchange

rate. Resident Indians are allowed to invest abroad without any limits. Non

Resident Indians (NRI) [now a very wide term] is allowed to repatriate proceeds

of their assets sold in India. Permitted allowances for business travel, education,

health, etc., are extremely generous. The ceilings on corporate investments

abroad or in joint ventures are very liberal, as also for securing external debt. In

2005-2006, repatriation from India in the form of interest and dividend

payments as well as profits of corporate was in excess of US$10 billion, the

highest figure ever in the last five decades. Thus, in most respects, there is

almost total current account flexibility. It is, however, true that the Indian rupee

is still not an ‘international’ currency, that is, it cannot be bought and sold in the

exchange market. Up to 1991, when India faced a major foreign exchange

crisis, there had been very rigid controls on both the external capital as well as

the current account. The liberalization process that started after 1991 and the

terms of the IMF conditionality helped to relieve the current account

transactions and the resulting growth and investments in the economy

augmented the forex reserves of the country. The improvements encouraged the

government to set up a committee in 1997 to spell out a road map for the full

convertibility of the rupee. First was that gross fiscal deficit as a percentage of

GDP should go down from 4.5% budgeted for 1997-98 to 3.5% by 2000.The

gross fiscal deficit, on the other hand, increased to 5.9% in 2002-2003? It only

23
came down to 4.1% in 2005-06. It is targeted to come down to 3.8% in 2006-07,

but still not close to the 3 % that is required by the Fiscal Responsibility Budget

Management Act. There is also the concern about stated fiscal deficits that had

reached high levels, and have only recently started coming down. Another

precondition was that the annual rate of inflation should be in the 3% to 5%

range. This has been maintained in India for over a decade and is close to 5%

now. However, higher energy and commodity prices are likely to be a cause for

concern on this front. The third precondition was that the foreign exchange

reserves of the country should be sufficient for six months’ imports.

Phenomenal increases in foreign exchange reserves were seen after 1999-2000.

In 2002-2003 alone, the reserves grew by US$21.3 billion. At present, foreign

exchange reserves are equal to two years import cover. The final condition was

that non-performing assets of banks should not be more than five percent of the

deposits. This is close to being reached. Soon after the submission of the report

in 1997, the East Asian crisis broke and there was rethinking on the issues of

full convertibility. In fact, economists all over, including the IMF, started

advocating a more gradual approach. The policy developments of the

subsequent years focused on gradual relaxations of the exchange rate regime,

more oriented towards greater flexibility for trade and investment than for

macroeconomic management of monetary or fiscal policy. The relaxations have

progressively extended to most sectors of the economy, and for quite some time

now, there have been suggestions for clarity of policy in respect of CAC.

24
The need for a clear road map at this stage arises from several considerations.

The floating peg regime that the RBI is implementing is becoming untenable.

As long as the RBI had significant quantities of government bonds to unload, it

could sterilize the liquidity caused by the buying of dollars by the release of

these bonds into the market. As the stocks of these bonds ran out, a new

mechanism of market sterilization bonds was thought up in 2004, by which the

RBI continues the sterilization process through the issue of these instruments.

As these are off the Consolidated Fund of India and do not enter into the

revenue streams of the government, they do not add to the fiscal deficit, though

the interest on these is to be paid for by the budget and has, to that extent, a

fiscal implication. It is an ad-hoc measure intended to have a control over

liquidity and hence over interest rates and inflation, but not a measure that

would be able to be used long term. It has succeeded moderately in the last year

due to lower needs of sterilization as current account flows turned negative last

year. There is increasing exposure of firms to external currency borrowing and

this requires a stable currency regime to be in place urgently. When the central

bank intervenes in the currency market, it creates an illusion that the currency is

not volatile, and this encourages firms, banks and governments to be reckless in

dollar borrowing. Borrowers tend not to hedge currency risks. When the central

bank is no longer able to sustain this illusion, there are sharp currency

movements that inevitably hurt the borrowers. Sound policies require that the

government should not have dollar liabilities. In India, de facto dollar

25
borrowing is taking place through devices such as bond issues by the Securities

and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) or NRI deposits of banks. Since banks are

not allowed to bust, these are actually sovereign liabilities. It should make sense

to allow Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) to access rupee borrowings and to

discourage firms from external borrowings until the currency regime and the

currency derivatives are in good shape. But, at the moment, the reverse is the

case. The problem is exacerbated by the fact that the rupee is pegged to the

United States dollar. Borrowers are encouraged by the belief that the dollar is a

safe currency. As the rupee/dollar exchanges lurch into periods of volatility, it

would hurt the borrowers and the institutions significantly. Thirdly, progressive

relaxations of controls have led to anomalies in terms of opportunities for

investments and repatriation. The slew of regulations on FDI, on investment in

external primary markets, on internal fund flows etc require a complex

regulatory policing that the banks, the RBI and SEBI are finding difficult to

handle. Several of these regulations have loopholes that are being exploited. An

important example is the use of Participatory Notes in the financial markets.

These are funds at the hands of FIIs that have been subscribed to by unknown

institutions and individuals, and are in the nature of ‘hot’ money. Attempts to

regulate them have not succeeded significantly; the RBI is worried about

likelihood of sudden outflows and of destabilizing effects. Managing the

rupee’s float within a system of limited convertibility and full interest rate

autonomy has become a nightmare. The RBI has had a difficult time balancing

26
capital inflows against the nation’s policy on money supply, interest rates,

inflation, price stability and growth. CAC has therefore become a necessity. The

timing is to India’s advantage with growing trade, expanding and transparent

financial markets, and increasing integration with global markets. Full

convertibility freely floating exchange rates would restore India’s autonomy

over money supply, interest rates and growth.




Changing International and Emerging Market Perspectives

There is some literature which supports a free capital account in the Context of

global integration, both in trade and finance, for enhancing growth and welfare.

The perspective on CAC has, however, undergone some change following the

experiences of emerging market economies (EMEs) in Asia and Latin America

which went through currency and banking crises in the 1990s.A few countries

backtracked and re-imposed some capital controls as part of crisis resolution.

While there are economic, social and human costs of crisis, it has also been

argued that extensive presence of capital controls, when an economy opens up

the current account, creates distortions, making them either ineffective or

unsustainable. The costs and benefits or risks and gains from capital account

liberalization or controls are still being debated among both academics and

policy makers. The IMF, which had mooted the idea of changing its Charter to

include capital account liberalization in its mandate, shelved this proposal.2.5


27
these developments have led to considerable caution being exercised by EMEs

in opening up the capital account. The link between capital account

liberalization and growth is yet to be firmly established by empirical research.

Nevertheless, the mainstream view holds that capital account liberalization can

be beneficial when countries move in tandem with a strong macroeconomic

policy framework, sound financial system and markets, supported by prudential

regulatory and supervisory policies.




28
Capital Account Convertibility: Necessary Reforms, Policies and
Pre-Conditions

      • Fiscal Policy, Monetary Policy, Sterilization and
        Exchange Rate Policy

Country experience with capital flows shows that financial integration boosts

growth by increasing investment and consumption and reduces volatility of

consumption with the increased opportunities for risk diversification and inter-

temporal consumption smoothing. However, large capital flows also lead to

rapid monetary, expansion, inflation, and real exchange rate appreciation. The

appropriate design of macroeconomic policy is extremely important in an

integrated world. Country experiences and the growing literature on the policy

response to a surge in capital flows shows that counter cyclical measures such

as tight monetary and fiscal policies and flexibility in the exchange rate are

essential to mange private capital flows. Other structural measures pertaining to

the financial sector, regulation, supervision and capital controls are discussed

elsewhere in this paper.



Fiscal Control

Sound macroeconomic polices are a basic pre-requisite for capital account

convertibility. The experience of the Southern Cone countries shows that fiscal

deficits emerge as one of the important factors accounting for success or failure

of liberalization programs. The experience has shown that government finances


29
and tax efforts need to be sufficiently strong to prevent the need for domestic

financial repression. Taxes on financial intermediation encourage capital

outflows and are no substitute for tax receipts. There is an urgent need in many

Developing countries to broaden the tax base. Fiscal control is needed so that

monetary policy can be assigned to the external objective. (Mundell, 1962). In

the absence of fiscal control, monetary policy is assigned to internal balance,

which can only be achieved with the aid of capital controls to insulate the

country from international capital movements. The aim of policy should be to

assign fiscal policy to attain internal balance and monetary policy to attain

external balance. Sound government finances would help in the achievement of

this objective. The experience of Singapore and Indonesia has shown that

manipulating the flow of liquidity into the banking system using government

excess savings partly frees the interest rate from demand management so that it

Can be used for exchange rate management. High stocks of domestic public

debt approaching unsustainable levels raises the chances of capital flight as

domestic investors fear a default on domestic debt. Keeping these factors in

mind, it is essential to control the fiscal deficit and finance it with a minimal

recourse to the inflation tax. Financing of the deficit through issuance of bonds

is problematic with an open capital account if it undermines the credibility of

the country servicing domestic debt. Fiscal discipline gives a signal to investors

as to the health of the economy. Moreover, if the fiscal situation is not under

control, Central Bank polices can become ineffective because of the lack of

30
fiscal discipline. Country experiences demonstrate the perverse effects that

sustained fiscal imbalances can have in the context of an open capital account.

In the 1990s, the Brazilian government ran persistent fiscal deficits that

encouraged expectations of continued inflation and high interest rates that

reinforced capital inflows into Brazil. The Brazilian experience also

demonstrates the ambiguities generated by a federal system in terms of fiscal

policy. While the Brazilian federal deficit dramatically deteriorated in

1993-1994, there was doubt as to whether it accurately reflected the fiscal

positions of the states. Consequently, when the state of Minas Gerais ran into

fiscal difficulties in 1998, it generated a national crisis as investors worried that

it was merely a prelude to further harmful disclosures. The large inflows into

Brazil

during the 1990s in the midst of this unsure fiscal environment suggests that

push factors (i.e. falling interest rates in advanced countries) may have

predominated over pull factors (i.e. domestic reform, improved macroeconomic

performance). It might also suggest an investor euphoria driven by the signing

of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1993 that stimulated flows to

the Latin America as a whole. As will be discussed later, the presence of an

elaborate capital control regime was unable to offset the negative effects of this

structural imbalance. In India, another country with a federal structure,

continued fiscal imbalances are currently placing greater pressure on the

country’s external accounts. Increasing fiscal imbalances leading up to Kenya’s

31
first democratic elections in late 1992, along with other factors, hindered the

country’s ability to induce inflows of capital despite its open capital account.

Those countries that have successfully liberalized the capital account – such as

Argentina, and Chile have all, with the exception of Colombia, shown a high

degree of fiscal discipline. Malaysia managed to attract capital inflows over

along period because of prudent fiscal policy.



Monetary Policy

The degree of financial integration also has implications for the conduct of

monetary policy. For some countries greater financial integration will impair

their ability to run independent monetary policies. As we move to a seamless

capital market very few interest rates will be determined domestically apart

from interest rates at the very short end. Attempts to depart from the

international structure of interest rates may result in very large and possibly

volatile capital flows exerting speculative pressure on exchange rates.

Movements in exchange a rate because of independent monetary polices may

cause increases in the currency risk component of interest rates. Monetary

policy may therefore in some countries have to passively adopt the monetary

policy of a large financial trading partner, than confronting volatile and harmful

Exchange rate pressures. These are the conditions in a perfectly integrated

financial world. In the intermediate stage of international financial integration a

Central Bank does have some control over monetary policy to avoid
32
macroeconomic instability caused by large capital flows. Some of the options

for managing capital flows in the short run are:

• To buy up reserves but sterilize the intervention by selling an equal value of

     Domestic currency bonds.

• To increase the cash reserve ratio applying to bank deposits credits from

     Abroad and swap operations.

• Monetary policy support through a tax on inflows.

 A pre-requisite for the success of sterilization policy is the move from direct to

 Indirect instruments of monetary policy. In some countries problems can occur

 Because of the lack of depth in the money and government securities market.

 In some small African economies problems can arise because of limiting

 Structural factors and the size of the economy. While open market operations

 Are necessary conditions for managing private capital flows, for countries with

less developed financial sectors it may be more effective to stay with direct

tools of monetary policy? Uganda, for example, finds its capacity to sterilize

inflows heavily constrained by the lack of sufficient monetary instruments and

the thinness of the market. We need to open the debate on financial

intermediation of international flows in this scenario. Even with open market

operations, sterilization is not without costs. This policy is designed to mitigate

the impact of capital inflows on money supply leading to inflationary pressures,

exchange rate appreciation and controlling the domestic money stock. Some of

the costs of sterilization are discussed below.

33
• Presumably capital flows into developing countries attracted by the higher rate

 Of return. If the capital flows are sterilized, the policy will prevent interest rate

Differential going down attracting further capital flows.

• A policy of sterilization involves issuing domestic bonds to offset an increase

 In currency Flow, results in an increase in public debt.14

• If the government does not issue domestic bonds, it will have to provide its

own currency leading to an increase in money supply and inflation. The

consequent build up of reserves would mean the case of a poor country lending

abroad. If sterilization takes place through domestic bonds, the country can

incur costs amounting to the difference between the interest paid on bonds at

home and the interest received on foreign reserves. The costs of sterilization

policy have been clearly reflected in country experience. Both Colombia and

Chile experienced high sterilization costs that led them to move to a capital

Control regime. Other forms of sterilization through reserve requirements and

taxes on capital inflows are discussed elsewhere is this paper. They have been

successful in some countries (such as Chile, Colombia and Thailand) in altering

the average maturity of the capital inflow, but not the total capital flow. The

experience of Chile is particularly interesting in relation to the constraints on

monetary policy in a small, open economy with a liberalized capital account

(see Annex 1 for a more detailed discussion of the Chilean experience). The

conflict between controlling domestic inflation (even with fiscal accounts in

balance) and preventing a sharp appreciation of the real exchange rate in the

34
context of large capital inflows, prompted Chile to search for greater flexibility

of monetary policy through the implementation of controls on capital inflows.

The Chilean controls appear to have provided a ‘wedge’ between domestic and

international rates that provided greater scope for authorities to target domestic

inflation, while avoiding the costs of sterilization (although it must be noted that

other costs were incurred, see Annex 1). The above measures can only be used

in the short-run. Their continuance can lead to agents developing new ways of

bypassing these regulations. In the long run, the only solution is to speed up the

financial and overall reform, so that outflows can be liberalized so that the two

way movement of capital takes care of financial intermediation, without the

necessity for some of these measures. The process would be aided by a flexible

exchange rate policy. Monetary policy would get some autonomy in countries

where the conditions are right to operate an exchange rate band.




Exchange Rate Policy

The significance of a flexible exchange rate goes up for an economy with an

open capital account as the influence of international variables is transmitted

more quickly than in an economy with a relatively closed capital account. What

is important for an open capital? This is the general case. The case study of

India illustrates that the huge stock of ad hoc treasury bills were available for

sterilization without increasing the stock of public debt. Account management is


35
that exchange rate policy should be flexible, with market participants bearing

exchange risk instead of the balance sheet of a central bank. Furthermore, the

Resulting uncertainty from a flexible exchange rate may discourage short-term

flows. Exchange rate uncertainty may discourage short-term flows. The

maintenance of a pegged exchange rate by the Thai authorities in the 1995-1997

periods constrained policy making, discouraged hedging by market participants

and reinforced capital inflows. It also provided a fixed target for speculators

who were quick to observe the inconsistency between an interest rate defense of

the baht peg and the health of the financial sector. A further advantage of

allowing greater exchange rate flexibility is that the appreciation of the

exchange rate is which is likely to occur through an appreciation of the nominal

exchange rate and not through higher inflation. This gives room for pursuing

autonomous monetary policy. It would force market participants to hedge their

positions and this would be a beneficial development for foreign exchange

market development. A drawback of a floating exchange rate regime is that it

may be associated with high volatility, which may damage the growth of

strategic sectors like non-traditional exports. Country experience suggests that

as capital account convertibility has progressed, countries have adopted more

flexible exchange rate regimes. Of the countries surveyed in Annex 2,

Colombia, Peru, Chile, Uganda, and Korea have all opted to introduce greater

flexibility into their exchange rate regime. Only, Argentina with its currency

board regime and Malaysia, which pegged the ringgit to the dollar as part of its

36
adjustment policy after the Asian crisis, have reverted to inflexible regimes. The

particular nature of the Argentine and Malaysian experiences should be noted.

Argentina sought credibility for its macroeconomic policy stance after

prolonged economic crises in the 1980s and the currency board was the surest

Method of acquiring this in international markets. Malaysia initiated its pegged

regime in the context of a broad policy of capital controls on outflows, which

helped ensure its maintenance. Thus, the general experience of capital account

liberalization is that a greater degree of exchange rate flexibility is required,

even if this takes the form of a currency band which helps reduce the volatility

associated with free floating regimes. It is for this reason that many countries

such as Israel, Colombia, Chile and Mexico adopted an intermediate regime of

an exchange rate band. Exchange rate bands can be implemented in countries

that have depth in the foreign exchange market and the market is well

developed so that two-way expectations can drive the exchange rate. It is an

intermediate regime, in which monetary policy can be used for domestic

objectives most of the time and but will be assigned to the external objective

when necessary to avoid what might be a serious misalignment. Correction of

exchange rate misalignments cannot be safely left to the market. The choice of

an appropriate exchange rate involves a trade-off between the benefit of

targeting inflation and the external competitiveness of a country. Actual policy

will have to be a mix of both these objectives as either extreme is harmful to a

country. Increased capital

37
Mobility limits the possibility of targeting the real exchange rate and therefore

allowing the exchange rate to fluctuate within a band is a desirable policy. A

credible announcement by the authorities that they will intervene to keep the

exchange rate within the band will encourage market corrections or limitations

to the misalignments without diverting monetary policy from its domestic

objectives. Refraining from intervening continually in the market will

discourage complacent traders who prevent market corrections through their

behavior. At the margin of the band, as part of official policy, the central bank is

expected to intervene but not necessary as market can carry out the corrective

speculation. With this policy the central bank can allow the market to work and

yet keep the surprise element in its policy. The central bank can also from time

to time review its own choice of the equilibrium exchange rate and signal a

major change is warranted by its own intervention and moving the parity around

which the exchange rate is fluctuating. Whether countries opt for a managed

floating exchange rate regime or an exchange rate band depending upon their

own circumstances, flexibility of the exchange rate is necessary with an open

capital account.




38
• Sequencing Current and Capital Account Liberalization

McKinnon (1973 and 1982) Frenkel (1982) and Edwards (1984) made a case

for liberalizing the capital account following the opening of the current account

and the domestic financial system. According to McKinnon if the opposite

sequencing were followed, excessive capital inflows would result in a

substantial appreciation of the real exchange rate, which would then

Hamper the opening up of the current account. Arguments for a simultaneous

opening of the current and capital account have been advanced by Little,

Scitovsky, and Scot, (1970), Michaely, (1986) and Krueger (1984).

Since many developing economies have signed Article VIII agreements with the

IMF, the issue of sequencing current and capital account liberalization needs

further qualification as to the time period between current and capital account

liberalization as the capital account can be porous because of a liberalized

current account. It also needs to focus on the type of restrictions needed on the

current account to avoid the loss of capital in the transition stage.




Inflation Rate
Among central bankers there is an increasing belief that an inflation rate in the

low, single-digit range is a desirable objective of policy. The achievement of

this policy will require central banks to have greater independence and


39
insulation from populist pressures. With an increasingly integrated world

economy and low inflation rates in the industrial countries, it is necessary for

developing countries to break inflationary expectations and achieve inflation

rates not far out of line with those in the industrial countries. High rates of

inflation are destabilizing and require high nominal and real rates of interest

which have negative real effects and could reinforce capital inflows (Brazil).

Conversely, artificially maintained low interest rates could induce large net

outflows of capital.




Financial Sector Reform
A central component of any policy directed at promoting capital account

liberalization is the reform and restructuring of the financial sector to avert

inefficient allocations of capital. In an environment of liberalized capital flows,

weaknesses of the financial system can cause macroeconomic instability and

crises (Thailand, Indonesia, and Kenya). The choice is therefore between a

careful reform of the financial system before or during the process of

liberalization, or emergency reforms after a crisis. Banking systems remain

weak in many

Developing countries burdened either by interest rate controls or mandated

lending to favored groups or firms. In addition, many systems have very high

reserve requirements relative to international levels. Reducing these

40
requirements diminishes the effectiveness of monetary policy in the absence of

indirect policy tools. Thus, the development of indirect tools such as open

market operations and interest rates should become a key objective of policy.

Reform must also encompass improved accounting standards, increased

monitoring and surveillance of bank risk exposure, and prudential standards that

conform to international standards (Basle Committee).



Monetary Policy

The development and deepening of financial markets following reform, also

changes the context in which monetary policy is conducted. A move from direct

monetary policy controls to indirect controls is desirable, as it avoids distortions

in financial intermediation and is more flexible for policy purposes. In addition,

the development of indirect controls also enables the central bank to more

effectively carry out sterilization operations in capital inflow episodes.

Appreciation of the exchange rate due to capital inflows diverts investment

away from the tradable sector when in persists for a long time. Sterilization is

needed to deal with this or it can be combined with other instruments such as

reserve requirements, taxes or a partial liberalization of outflows. In small

economies the financial markets lack of depth and it may be feasible to rely on

more direct monetary policy tools.




41
Exchange Rate Policy

 Exchange rate policy becomes even more central to policymaking concerns

with moves towards capital account convertibility. Authorities must decide on

the optimal degree of exchange rate flexibility with an aim to prevent either

unsustainable appreciations of the real exchange rate that can undermine

competitiveness or expensive interest rate defences of fixed rates and/or costly

sterilization operations. The balance between these considerations is complex,

although there is a general belief that exchange rate regimes have to be more

Flexible under capital account convertibility.



Current Account Balance

Current account deficits are commonly found in developing countries, reflecting

the use of global savings to achieve desired levels of growth and investment.

Experience suggests that prudent limits must be set on expanding deficits. The

counterpart of current account deficits are expanding external liabilities, and as

the deficit rises debt servicing begins to account for an increasing proportion of

external earnings that could be otherwise used to increase imports. Thus, high

current account deficits may constrain growth by retarding importsas well as

leading to fears of contraction and/or crisis.




42
Foreign Exchange Reserves

With capital account convertibility, the level of international reserves becomes a

key consideration for policymakers. Reserves help to cushion the impact of

cyclical changes in the balance of payments and help offset unanticipated

shocks, which can lead to reversals of capital flows. Reserves also help sustain

confidence in both domestic policy and exchange rate policy. The optimal level

of reserves is of course contingent on a country’’ specific circumstances,

including its balance of payments, exchange rate regime and access to

international finance. Indicators of reserve adequacy should be derived from

measures of import cover and debt servicing. Another important ratio to monitor

is the ratio of short-term debt and portfolio stocks to reserves to guard against

sudden depreciation.




Lowering tariff barriers

Reforming the trade regime to make it more open to the international economy

is part of the structural reforms that should precede CAC. High tariffs, in

addition to their allocative inefficiency, encourage direct investment in the

economy that is not directed towards export markets, but rather towards ‘tariff




43
jumping’. Lowering tariffs is therefore linked to the promotion of a diversified

export base.



Diversified export base

A diversified export base helps cushion the economy from sudden terms of

trade or other shocks that may emerge from dependence on a narrow range of

exports. Such shocks have immediate effects upon the current account and with

a loss of confidence in the country’s capacity to meet debt repayments or

sustain the current rate of capital inflows, may drive a capital account crisis as

well. Developing countries have traditionally been vulnerable to such shocks to

the export sector, often arising from dependence on primary commodity

exports. The process of promoting non-traditional exports can encompass

promotion of domestic firms through some kind of industrial policy or through

the encouragement of foreign direct investment. In the latter case, it is essential

that countries promote FDI in exportable sectors.

Current account liberalization can lead to a de facto liberalization of the capital

account because it is possible for capital to leave through leads and lags.

Kasekende et al. (1997) and Kimei et al. (1997) find evidence of significant

capital flows through current account transactions and foreign exchange bureaus

for Uganda and Tanzania. Kahn (1991) found substantial evidence of capital

flight through the current account for South Africa. Some developing countries



44
retain certain restrictions on the current account with Article VIII status.13 It is

however difficult to gauge which restrictions achieve the objectives for which

They have been set. This is an area for research. India maintained certain

restrictions on the current account with Article VIII status to avoid the

movement of capital through the current account because controls on the

movement of capital by the resident sector have not been liberalized. Hence,

certain preventive measures were built into the regulations relating to current

account transactions. (In recent weeks some small steps have been made to

liberalize this sector but the focus is still on micro management of exchange

controls.) An attempt is made to capture the impact of opening of the current

account on the porosity of the capital account. Estimates of misinvoicing of

trade data based on partner country comparison of the country with

industrialized countries for a select sample of four countries is revealing.




External Sector Indicators

Recent developments in the balance of payment (BoP) indicate continuing

resilience of the external sector even as the Indian economy is entering an

expansionary phase of the business cycle. There has been an emergence of a

current account deficit (CAD) in 2004-05 and 2005-06 after surpluses in the




45
preceding three years (2001-04). For a developing country like India, imports of

raw materials, intermediates, capital goods, technology and services hold the

key to scaling up growth in the medium-term. It is important to recognize that

current BoP has significantly improved over 1990-91.




Current Account Deficit

Since the crisis of 1990-91, during which a CAD of 3 per cent of GDP turned

out to be unsustainable, the appropriate level of the CAD for India has been the

subject of considerable deliberation. The appropriate level of the CAD is a

dynamic concept and cannot be fixed in time, or cast in stone. The openness is

based on the increase in the current receipts to GDP ratio to 24.5 per cent in

2005-06, which is substantially higher than the ratio of 8.0 per cent in 1990-91.

Current receipts in 2005-06 pay for 95 per cent of current payments, up from 72

per cent in 1990-91. Acceleration in the growth of current earnings economises

on the need to seek access to International financial markets and strengthens the

ability to run a higher CAD (and achieve higher growth) without encountering a

financing constraint. Stepping up the growth of current receipts is essential for

sustaining a higher CAD. Viability of the CAD is a function of the availability

of normal capital flows, as opposed to exceptional financing. Net capital flows

have regularly exceeded the CAD requirements by a fair measure, enabling


46
large accretions to the reserves. During 2005-06, the CAD has been comfortably

financed by net capital flows with over US$ 15 billion added to the foreign

exchange reserves. Compositional shifts in favour of foreign investment have

actually strengthened the economy's absorptive capacity. The share of non-debt

creating flows in net capital flows has, in fact, risen from 1 per cent in 1990-91

to nearly 50 per cent in 2004-05. The operating ‘viability’ criterion for

determining the access to capital flows is the ability to service external

liabilities as embodied in a low ratio of debt service payments to current

receipts. The debt service ratio (DSR) has fallen to as low as 10.2 per cent in

2005-06 and the ratio of the external debt stock to GDP was a modest 15.8 per

cent. The DSR could safely be in the range of 10-15 per cent. If the ratio of

current account deficit to GDP is regarded as the target variable, the ratio of

Current receipts to GDP can be regarded as the instrument variable.

Accordingly, a sustainable current account deficit is dependent on the current

receipts to GDP ratio. A rising current receipts to GDP ratio will enable a higher

current account deficit which would enable a higher investment ratio. Given the

present CR/GDP ratio of 24.5 per cent, the CR/CP ratio of 95 per cent and a

debt service ratio in the range of 10-15 per cent, a CAD/GDP ratio of 3 per cent

could be comfortably financed. Should the CAD/GDP ratio rise substantially

over 3 per cent there would be a need for policy action.




47
Limitation of the Study:


The analysis will be purely based on the primary and secondary data. The

primary data comprise only of feedback collected from retail investors. It will

not include institutional investors. The currency future is a new concept.




48
Conclusion



The process of macro economic reforms which ushered in 1991 has evolved

slowly but steadily over the last one and half decade contributing for building

stronger Indian economy. The next major step in this direction would be Indian

opting for Capital Account Convertibility because it continues to be a desirable

objective for providing another growth impetus for Indian economy as whole

and Indian companies in particular. Though there are certain caveats like it may

lead to aggressive moves by international players ( by exercising their financial

muscle) and further intensify the competition for domestic companies but a

carefully   drafted   policy   suitable   to   Indian   requirement   and   steady

implementation of it would minimize ill effects and maximize the gains.




49
Bibliography



Report of the RBI-SEBI standing technical committee on exchange traded

Currency futures) 2008

Recent Development in International Currency Market by: Lucjan T. Orlowski)




Websites:

http://www.google.com

http://www.scribd.com

http://www.management paradise.com

http://www.wikipedia.com

http://www..com

http://www.sebi.gov.in

http://www.bloomberg.com




50

Pgdft

  • 1.
    CURRENT ACCOUNT CONVERTIBILITYOF INDIAN RUPEES A PROJECT REPORT Submitted to the faculty of Management In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Post Graduate Diploma In Foreign Trade SINHGAD BUSINESS SCHOOL SUBMITTED BY MANISH NAGAR PGDFT II SEM SBS - 110004 1
  • 2.
    ` CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the project entitled “CURRENT ACCOUNT CONVERTIBILITY OF INDIAN RUPEES” has been carried out by MANISH NAGAR under my guidance in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Post Graduate Diploma In Foreign Trade during academic year 2011-2012. GUIDE DIRECTOR Mrs. Prashant pawar Mrs. M.S.Sathe . 2
  • 3.
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I take this opportunity to express my deep sense of gratitude and indebt- ness to Mrs.prashant pawar under whose able guidance the present work has been completed. I am very thankful devotion of help and Suggestions. I am also thankful to my whole teacher staff for their direct indirect support to me. Manish nagar 3
  • 4.
    Index Sr. pg.no No. 1 Introduction 5 2 Convertibility why? 7 3 What does current account convertibility means? 8 4 Types of convertibility 9 5 Types of accounts 13 6 Impacts of current and capital account convertibility 14 7 Benefits of current and capital account convertibility 16 8 Convertibility on Current Account 19 9 Current Situation on Current Account 21 10 Path that lead to Current Account Convertibility 22 11 Necessary reforms, policies and pre-conditions 29 12 Limitations 48 13 Conclusion 49 4
  • 5.
    Introduction Each country has its own currency through which both national and international transactions are performed. All the international business transactions involve an exchange of one currency for another. For example, If any Indian firm borrows funds from international financial market in US dollars for short or long term then at maturity the same would be refunded in particular agreed currency along with accrued interest on borrowed money. It means that the borrowed foreign currency brought in the country will be converted into Indian currency, and when borrowed fund are paid to the lender then the home currency will be converted into foreign lender’s currency. Thus, the currency units Of a country involve an exchange of one currency for another. The price of one currency in terms of other currency is known as exchange rate. The foreign exchange markets of a country provide the mechanism of exchanging different currencies with one and another, and thus, facilitating transfer of purchasing power from one country to another. With the multiple growths of international trade and finance all over the world, trading in foreign currencies has grown tremendously over the past several decades. Since the exchange rates are continuously changing, so the firms are exposed to the risk of exchange rate movements. As a result the assets or liability or cash flows of a 5
  • 6.
    firm which aredenominated in foreign currencies undergo a change in value over a period of time due to variation in exchange rates. This variability in the value of assets or liabilities or cash flows is referred to exchange rate risk. Since the fixed exchange rate system has been fallen in the early 1970s, specifically in developed countries, the currency risk has become substantial for many business firms. As a result, these firms are increasingly turning to various risk hedging products like foreign currency futures, foreign currency forwards, foreign currency options, and foreign currency swaps. Convertibility essentially means the ability of residents and non-residents to exchange domestic currency for foreign currency, without limit, whatever is the purpose of the transactions. 6
  • 7.
    Convertibility: why? Externally inconvertiblecurrencies may be of rather limited value to their holder. An exported item from a developing country to the USSR, for example, may be paid for in rubles or the currency of a country that has ratified Article VIII. The proceeds may be used to purchase goods anywhere. In considering possible import suppliers, therefore, a developing country will have some interest in directing its importers to those countries that will have some interest in directing its importers to those countries whose inconvertible currencies are in large supply. This is, of course, a case of trade discrimination that is condemned by traditional theory. This means that goods are not being purchased from the cheapest source. Recent economic writing has, however, reopened the question in view of the continued existence of inconvertible currencies. Where it is profitable on the export side to trade with countries maintaining inconvertible currencies, and the government wishes to encourage imports from those countries to offset its credit balances, it will utilize its exchange distribution mechanism to limit the availability of convertible exchange where there are alternative suppliers of the same type of goods in inconvertible currency countries. 7
  • 8.
    What exactly doescurrent account convertibility of rupee means? Current Account Convertibility means that rupee can now be freely convertible into any foreign currencies for acquisition of assets like shares, properties and assets abroad. Further, the banks can accept deposits in any currency. At present, Indian rupee was partly convertible on current account. It provided flexibility to buy or sell foreign exchange for specific activities like payments for trade related activities, interest payments, remittances, business expenses etc. Further, an individual was allowed to buy shares worth $ 25,000 per anumn only. India has come a long way from the FERA, 1947 to FERA, 1973 and now to FEMA, 2000. It has seen the days from non-convertibility of money to partial convertibility of money. Now, after the instructions from the PM, the finance minister Mr. P. Chidambaram said that RBI and centre shall announce steps for greater convertibility of rupee. This reform shall mean a lot for our country’s development and growth plus it shall mark a new era in terms of globalization and liberalization. For an economy which was so close, such a step is indeed a landmark – a mile stone achieved. 8
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Current account convertibility Currentaccount is defined as including the value of trade in merchandise, services, investment, income and unilateral transfers. Current account convertibility, being essential to the development of multilateral trade, three approaches to current account convertibility has been adapted by developing countries. These are the pre-announcement, by-product, and front-loading approaches. Each approach is distinguished by the importance it attaches to convertibility relative to other economic objectives. Capital account convertibility Capital account includes transactions of financial assets. Its convertibility refers to the freedom to convert local financial assets into foreign assets in any form and vice versa at market-determined rates of exchange. Capital controls normally restrict or prohibit cross-border movement of capital. Thus, controls on capital movements include prohibitions: need for prior approval; authorization and notification; multiple currency practices; discriminatory taxes; and reserve requirements or interest penalties imposed by the authorities that regulate the conclusion or execution of transactions. The coverage of the regulations would apply to receipts as well as payments and to actions initiated by non-residents and residents. 10
  • 11.
    To begin withlet’s understand the concept of currency convertibility. Currency convertibility may be defined as the freedom to convert one currency into other internationally accepted currencies. Thus in a CAG regime the country places no exchange controls or restrictions on foreign exchange transactions. There are two forms of convertibility – convertibility for current international transactions and the convertibility for international capital movements. While India is still to opt for full Capital Account Convertibility, the government has made the rupee convertible on the current account. This implies that companies and resident Indians can make and receive payments for import/export of goods and services and be able to access foreign currency for travel, education, medical or other designated purposes. Though there is no formal definition of CAC, the Tarapore Committee provides some clarity in this regard as it defines the same as - the freedom to convert local financial assets into foreign financial assets and vice versa at market determined rates of exchange. In other words, Capital account convertibility means that the home currency can be freely converted into foreign currencies for acquisition of capital assets abroad. Thus, implementation of the capital account convertibility regime will allow Indian residents to invest, disinvest or transact in any property or assets/liability of any country, convert one currency to another or move funds anywhere in the world, solely guided by discretion of the concern individual or company & not restricted by law. 11
  • 12.
    External and internalconvertibility when all holdings of the currency by non-residents are freely exchangeable into any foreign (non- resident) currency at exchange rates within the official margins than that currency is said to be externally convertible. All payments that residents of the country are authorized to make to non-residents may be made in any externally convertible currency that residents can buy in foreign exchange markets. And if there are no restrictions on the ability of a country to use their holdings of domestic currency to acquire any foreign currency and hold it, or transfer it to any nonresident for any purpose, that country’s currency is said to be internally convertible. Thus external convertibility is the partial convertibility and total convertibility is the sum of external and internal convertibility. TYPES OF ACCOUNTS: 12
  • 13.
    Current Account: A record of all international transactions for goods and services. The current account combines the transactions of the trade account and the services account. Merchandise Trade Account: A record of all international transactions for goods only. Goods include physical items like autos, steel, food, clothes, appliances, furniture, et al Services Account: A record of all international transactions for services only. Services include transportation, insurance, hotel, restaurant, legal services, Consulting, et al 13
  • 14.
    Impacts of currentand capital account convertibility Impact on corporate sector However, it is interesting to note the impact which such free flow of currency would have on Indian corporate. In the last two–three years we have been witnessing the growing phenomena of India Inc. being on the acquisition spree abroad. In 2002 while Indian companies acquired 49 companies the same has grown to around 100 with total money used for the same increasing from US $ 1800 mn to US $ 2300 mn during the same period. The trend which was earlier restricted to certain sectors like information technology has now spread across the industries whether it is automobile, pharmaceuticals, auto-ancillary, ITES (IT Enabled Services) and so on. In the overseas markets Indian companies are buying out even bigger size companies in order to become a globally efficient company and thus tackle the global competition successfully. Also The acquisition drive in 2005 was not restricted to traditional US and UK but Indian companies went to countries as diverse as Australia, Romania, Germany, Bulgaria, South Africa etc. Ushering of CAC regime would facilitate the process of globalization of India Inc. as a whole. This is because so far Indian companies have been predominantly utilizing the proceeds from the overseas issues like ECB (External Commercial Borrowing), FCCB (Foreign Currency Convertible Bonds) to finance their overseas buyout. However, this indirect 14
  • 15.
    route has beendelaying the actual acquisition process and the consequent integration of the acquired entity with the rest of the business of the acquiring company. But if there no restriction on foreign currency availability for Indian company then it would substantially boost their financial flexibility. They can expedite the process of International acquisition once the target company is identified. Thus, overseas buy outs would be very fast and efficient which in turn would reduce the time period required to enjoy benefit of the acquisition done. Increasing globalization Making the overseas acquisition hassle free would also provide an impetus to the entire process of Indian companies truly becoming global size with more number of companies opting for it which were restrained so far due to limited access to international funds. In fact this could be high time for Indian government to speed up the CAC reforms since there are several US companies going bankrupt in the recent months whereas Indian companies has not taken the advantage of it so far. Thus creation of more conducive environment & free exchange of currencies would create a policy background which would enable Indian companies to acquire overseas companies more aggressively going forward. Benefits of current and capital account convertibility 15
  • 16.
    Apart from theabove mentioned benefits Indian corporate sector would also enjoy certain benefits in the long term. In this entire procedure companies with high focus on exports & globalization would benefit immensely. Thus the top rung companies from the software, textile, pharma, auto, auto components industries having growing and substantial export revenues would have added advantage. This is due to the fact that it would result into hassle free movement of the currencies which would ensure that they can more efficiently utilize the overseas earnings. Also this will simplify the investment diversification process for Indian companies as they will have greater choice of parking their surplus funds with global investment venues at their disposal. So not only Indian citizens but corporate India will also have wider investment options and can spread their investment across various countries. OVERVIEW OF THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKET IN INDIA 16
  • 17.
    During the early1990s, India embarked on a series of structural reforms in the foreign exchange market. The exchange rate regime, that was earlier pegged, was partially floated in March 1992 and fully floated in March 1993. The unification of the exchange rate was instrumental in developing a market- determined exchange rate of the rupee and was an important step in the progress towards total current account convertibility, which was achieved in August 1994. Although liberalization helped the Indian forex market in various ways, it led to extensive fluctuations of exchange rate. This issue has attracted a great deal of concern from policy-makers and investors. While some flexibility in foreign exchange markets and exchange rate determination is desirable, excessive volatility can have an adverse impact on price discovery, export performance, sustainability of current account balance, and balance sheets. In the context of upgrading Indian foreign exchange market to international standards, a well- developed foreign exchange derivative market (both OTC as well as Exchange-traded) is imperative With a view to enable entities to manage volatility in the currency market, RBI on April 20, 2007 issued comprehensive guidelines on the usage of foreign currency forwards, swaps and options in the OTC market. At the same time, RBI also set up an Internal Working Group to explore the advantages of introducing currency futures. Current Account 17
  • 18.
    It refers tocurrency convertibility required in the case of transactions relating to exchange of goods and services, money transfers and all those transactions that are classified in the current account. In Short, Current account includes all transactions, which give rise to or use of our National income Current Account Transactions All imports and exports of merchandise Invisible Exports and Imports (sale/purchase of services Inward private remittances (to & fro) Pension payments (to & fro) Government Grants (both ways) 18
  • 19.
    Convertibility on CurrentAccount India is fully convertible on the current account A full convertibility means movement of funds in & out of India without any restrictions & permissions.Provides full freedom to both residents and non-residents to trade in goods/services. RBI has placed a cap in creation of a capital asset In India, most current account transactions have been freed from controls over the years. Current account convertibility refers to freedom in respect of Payments and transfers for current international transactions. In other words, if Indians are allowed to buy only foreign goods and services but restrictions remain on the purchase of assets abroad, it is only current account convertibility. Liberalization of current account transactions leading to current account convertibility a compositional shift in capital flows away from debt- to non- debt-creating flows strict regulation of external commercial borrowings, especially short-term debt discouraging volatile elements of flows from nonresident Indians gradual liberalization of outflows disintermediation of the government in the flow of external assistance Introducing a market-determined exchange rate regime 19
  • 20.
    Dual exchange ratesystem Liberalised Exchange Rate Management System involving dual exchange rate system was instituted in March 1992 The dual exchange rate system was essentially a transitional stage leading to the ultimate convergence of the dual rates made effective from March 1, 1993 Two rates of exchange: Official rate of exchange & Market rate of exchange 60% of the export earnings could be converted at the free market determined rate. (which was around Rs.28) The balance 40% of the earnings should be sold to RBI through authorised dealers at the Official rate of exchange. (generally higher at Rs.32) Full convertibility of the current account This unification of exchange rates brought about the era of market determined exchange. Rate regime of rupee, based on demand and supply in the forex market.Liberalize the access to foreign exchange for all current business transactions including travel, education, medical expenses, etc.Under Article VIII of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement in August 1994. 20
  • 21.
    Current Situation onCurrent Account India is fully convertible on the current accountProvides full freedom to both residents and non-residents to trade in goods/services. RBI has placed a cap in creation of a capital asset 21
  • 22.
    Path that leadto Current Account Convertibility Economists understand that capital mobility, fixed exchange rates and interest rates autonomy cannot exist together in any economy. The effects of monetary and fiscal policy in an open economy depend on capital mobility. Under floating exchange rates, monetary policy is a powerful tool for policy. Developing countries that seek to manage all three of the ingredients through policy often attempt (like India) to adopt a ‘moving peg’ system that corrects exchange rates through a series of time lagged steps. The problem in this 22
  • 23.
    approach is thatthe central bank (the RBI, for example) has to intervene periodically in the market to buy or sell dollars to prop up the current exchange rate. Resident Indians are allowed to invest abroad without any limits. Non Resident Indians (NRI) [now a very wide term] is allowed to repatriate proceeds of their assets sold in India. Permitted allowances for business travel, education, health, etc., are extremely generous. The ceilings on corporate investments abroad or in joint ventures are very liberal, as also for securing external debt. In 2005-2006, repatriation from India in the form of interest and dividend payments as well as profits of corporate was in excess of US$10 billion, the highest figure ever in the last five decades. Thus, in most respects, there is almost total current account flexibility. It is, however, true that the Indian rupee is still not an ‘international’ currency, that is, it cannot be bought and sold in the exchange market. Up to 1991, when India faced a major foreign exchange crisis, there had been very rigid controls on both the external capital as well as the current account. The liberalization process that started after 1991 and the terms of the IMF conditionality helped to relieve the current account transactions and the resulting growth and investments in the economy augmented the forex reserves of the country. The improvements encouraged the government to set up a committee in 1997 to spell out a road map for the full convertibility of the rupee. First was that gross fiscal deficit as a percentage of GDP should go down from 4.5% budgeted for 1997-98 to 3.5% by 2000.The gross fiscal deficit, on the other hand, increased to 5.9% in 2002-2003? It only 23
  • 24.
    came down to4.1% in 2005-06. It is targeted to come down to 3.8% in 2006-07, but still not close to the 3 % that is required by the Fiscal Responsibility Budget Management Act. There is also the concern about stated fiscal deficits that had reached high levels, and have only recently started coming down. Another precondition was that the annual rate of inflation should be in the 3% to 5% range. This has been maintained in India for over a decade and is close to 5% now. However, higher energy and commodity prices are likely to be a cause for concern on this front. The third precondition was that the foreign exchange reserves of the country should be sufficient for six months’ imports. Phenomenal increases in foreign exchange reserves were seen after 1999-2000. In 2002-2003 alone, the reserves grew by US$21.3 billion. At present, foreign exchange reserves are equal to two years import cover. The final condition was that non-performing assets of banks should not be more than five percent of the deposits. This is close to being reached. Soon after the submission of the report in 1997, the East Asian crisis broke and there was rethinking on the issues of full convertibility. In fact, economists all over, including the IMF, started advocating a more gradual approach. The policy developments of the subsequent years focused on gradual relaxations of the exchange rate regime, more oriented towards greater flexibility for trade and investment than for macroeconomic management of monetary or fiscal policy. The relaxations have progressively extended to most sectors of the economy, and for quite some time now, there have been suggestions for clarity of policy in respect of CAC. 24
  • 25.
    The need fora clear road map at this stage arises from several considerations. The floating peg regime that the RBI is implementing is becoming untenable. As long as the RBI had significant quantities of government bonds to unload, it could sterilize the liquidity caused by the buying of dollars by the release of these bonds into the market. As the stocks of these bonds ran out, a new mechanism of market sterilization bonds was thought up in 2004, by which the RBI continues the sterilization process through the issue of these instruments. As these are off the Consolidated Fund of India and do not enter into the revenue streams of the government, they do not add to the fiscal deficit, though the interest on these is to be paid for by the budget and has, to that extent, a fiscal implication. It is an ad-hoc measure intended to have a control over liquidity and hence over interest rates and inflation, but not a measure that would be able to be used long term. It has succeeded moderately in the last year due to lower needs of sterilization as current account flows turned negative last year. There is increasing exposure of firms to external currency borrowing and this requires a stable currency regime to be in place urgently. When the central bank intervenes in the currency market, it creates an illusion that the currency is not volatile, and this encourages firms, banks and governments to be reckless in dollar borrowing. Borrowers tend not to hedge currency risks. When the central bank is no longer able to sustain this illusion, there are sharp currency movements that inevitably hurt the borrowers. Sound policies require that the government should not have dollar liabilities. In India, de facto dollar 25
  • 26.
    borrowing is takingplace through devices such as bond issues by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) or NRI deposits of banks. Since banks are not allowed to bust, these are actually sovereign liabilities. It should make sense to allow Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) to access rupee borrowings and to discourage firms from external borrowings until the currency regime and the currency derivatives are in good shape. But, at the moment, the reverse is the case. The problem is exacerbated by the fact that the rupee is pegged to the United States dollar. Borrowers are encouraged by the belief that the dollar is a safe currency. As the rupee/dollar exchanges lurch into periods of volatility, it would hurt the borrowers and the institutions significantly. Thirdly, progressive relaxations of controls have led to anomalies in terms of opportunities for investments and repatriation. The slew of regulations on FDI, on investment in external primary markets, on internal fund flows etc require a complex regulatory policing that the banks, the RBI and SEBI are finding difficult to handle. Several of these regulations have loopholes that are being exploited. An important example is the use of Participatory Notes in the financial markets. These are funds at the hands of FIIs that have been subscribed to by unknown institutions and individuals, and are in the nature of ‘hot’ money. Attempts to regulate them have not succeeded significantly; the RBI is worried about likelihood of sudden outflows and of destabilizing effects. Managing the rupee’s float within a system of limited convertibility and full interest rate autonomy has become a nightmare. The RBI has had a difficult time balancing 26
  • 27.
    capital inflows againstthe nation’s policy on money supply, interest rates, inflation, price stability and growth. CAC has therefore become a necessity. The timing is to India’s advantage with growing trade, expanding and transparent financial markets, and increasing integration with global markets. Full convertibility freely floating exchange rates would restore India’s autonomy over money supply, interest rates and growth. Changing International and Emerging Market Perspectives There is some literature which supports a free capital account in the Context of global integration, both in trade and finance, for enhancing growth and welfare. The perspective on CAC has, however, undergone some change following the experiences of emerging market economies (EMEs) in Asia and Latin America which went through currency and banking crises in the 1990s.A few countries backtracked and re-imposed some capital controls as part of crisis resolution. While there are economic, social and human costs of crisis, it has also been argued that extensive presence of capital controls, when an economy opens up the current account, creates distortions, making them either ineffective or unsustainable. The costs and benefits or risks and gains from capital account liberalization or controls are still being debated among both academics and policy makers. The IMF, which had mooted the idea of changing its Charter to include capital account liberalization in its mandate, shelved this proposal.2.5 27
  • 28.
    these developments haveled to considerable caution being exercised by EMEs in opening up the capital account. The link between capital account liberalization and growth is yet to be firmly established by empirical research. Nevertheless, the mainstream view holds that capital account liberalization can be beneficial when countries move in tandem with a strong macroeconomic policy framework, sound financial system and markets, supported by prudential regulatory and supervisory policies. 28
  • 29.
    Capital Account Convertibility:Necessary Reforms, Policies and Pre-Conditions • Fiscal Policy, Monetary Policy, Sterilization and Exchange Rate Policy Country experience with capital flows shows that financial integration boosts growth by increasing investment and consumption and reduces volatility of consumption with the increased opportunities for risk diversification and inter- temporal consumption smoothing. However, large capital flows also lead to rapid monetary, expansion, inflation, and real exchange rate appreciation. The appropriate design of macroeconomic policy is extremely important in an integrated world. Country experiences and the growing literature on the policy response to a surge in capital flows shows that counter cyclical measures such as tight monetary and fiscal policies and flexibility in the exchange rate are essential to mange private capital flows. Other structural measures pertaining to the financial sector, regulation, supervision and capital controls are discussed elsewhere in this paper. Fiscal Control Sound macroeconomic polices are a basic pre-requisite for capital account convertibility. The experience of the Southern Cone countries shows that fiscal deficits emerge as one of the important factors accounting for success or failure of liberalization programs. The experience has shown that government finances 29
  • 30.
    and tax effortsneed to be sufficiently strong to prevent the need for domestic financial repression. Taxes on financial intermediation encourage capital outflows and are no substitute for tax receipts. There is an urgent need in many Developing countries to broaden the tax base. Fiscal control is needed so that monetary policy can be assigned to the external objective. (Mundell, 1962). In the absence of fiscal control, monetary policy is assigned to internal balance, which can only be achieved with the aid of capital controls to insulate the country from international capital movements. The aim of policy should be to assign fiscal policy to attain internal balance and monetary policy to attain external balance. Sound government finances would help in the achievement of this objective. The experience of Singapore and Indonesia has shown that manipulating the flow of liquidity into the banking system using government excess savings partly frees the interest rate from demand management so that it Can be used for exchange rate management. High stocks of domestic public debt approaching unsustainable levels raises the chances of capital flight as domestic investors fear a default on domestic debt. Keeping these factors in mind, it is essential to control the fiscal deficit and finance it with a minimal recourse to the inflation tax. Financing of the deficit through issuance of bonds is problematic with an open capital account if it undermines the credibility of the country servicing domestic debt. Fiscal discipline gives a signal to investors as to the health of the economy. Moreover, if the fiscal situation is not under control, Central Bank polices can become ineffective because of the lack of 30
  • 31.
    fiscal discipline. Countryexperiences demonstrate the perverse effects that sustained fiscal imbalances can have in the context of an open capital account. In the 1990s, the Brazilian government ran persistent fiscal deficits that encouraged expectations of continued inflation and high interest rates that reinforced capital inflows into Brazil. The Brazilian experience also demonstrates the ambiguities generated by a federal system in terms of fiscal policy. While the Brazilian federal deficit dramatically deteriorated in 1993-1994, there was doubt as to whether it accurately reflected the fiscal positions of the states. Consequently, when the state of Minas Gerais ran into fiscal difficulties in 1998, it generated a national crisis as investors worried that it was merely a prelude to further harmful disclosures. The large inflows into Brazil during the 1990s in the midst of this unsure fiscal environment suggests that push factors (i.e. falling interest rates in advanced countries) may have predominated over pull factors (i.e. domestic reform, improved macroeconomic performance). It might also suggest an investor euphoria driven by the signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1993 that stimulated flows to the Latin America as a whole. As will be discussed later, the presence of an elaborate capital control regime was unable to offset the negative effects of this structural imbalance. In India, another country with a federal structure, continued fiscal imbalances are currently placing greater pressure on the country’s external accounts. Increasing fiscal imbalances leading up to Kenya’s 31
  • 32.
    first democratic electionsin late 1992, along with other factors, hindered the country’s ability to induce inflows of capital despite its open capital account. Those countries that have successfully liberalized the capital account – such as Argentina, and Chile have all, with the exception of Colombia, shown a high degree of fiscal discipline. Malaysia managed to attract capital inflows over along period because of prudent fiscal policy. Monetary Policy The degree of financial integration also has implications for the conduct of monetary policy. For some countries greater financial integration will impair their ability to run independent monetary policies. As we move to a seamless capital market very few interest rates will be determined domestically apart from interest rates at the very short end. Attempts to depart from the international structure of interest rates may result in very large and possibly volatile capital flows exerting speculative pressure on exchange rates. Movements in exchange a rate because of independent monetary polices may cause increases in the currency risk component of interest rates. Monetary policy may therefore in some countries have to passively adopt the monetary policy of a large financial trading partner, than confronting volatile and harmful Exchange rate pressures. These are the conditions in a perfectly integrated financial world. In the intermediate stage of international financial integration a Central Bank does have some control over monetary policy to avoid 32
  • 33.
    macroeconomic instability causedby large capital flows. Some of the options for managing capital flows in the short run are: • To buy up reserves but sterilize the intervention by selling an equal value of Domestic currency bonds. • To increase the cash reserve ratio applying to bank deposits credits from Abroad and swap operations. • Monetary policy support through a tax on inflows. A pre-requisite for the success of sterilization policy is the move from direct to Indirect instruments of monetary policy. In some countries problems can occur Because of the lack of depth in the money and government securities market. In some small African economies problems can arise because of limiting Structural factors and the size of the economy. While open market operations Are necessary conditions for managing private capital flows, for countries with less developed financial sectors it may be more effective to stay with direct tools of monetary policy? Uganda, for example, finds its capacity to sterilize inflows heavily constrained by the lack of sufficient monetary instruments and the thinness of the market. We need to open the debate on financial intermediation of international flows in this scenario. Even with open market operations, sterilization is not without costs. This policy is designed to mitigate the impact of capital inflows on money supply leading to inflationary pressures, exchange rate appreciation and controlling the domestic money stock. Some of the costs of sterilization are discussed below. 33
  • 34.
    • Presumably capitalflows into developing countries attracted by the higher rate Of return. If the capital flows are sterilized, the policy will prevent interest rate Differential going down attracting further capital flows. • A policy of sterilization involves issuing domestic bonds to offset an increase In currency Flow, results in an increase in public debt.14 • If the government does not issue domestic bonds, it will have to provide its own currency leading to an increase in money supply and inflation. The consequent build up of reserves would mean the case of a poor country lending abroad. If sterilization takes place through domestic bonds, the country can incur costs amounting to the difference between the interest paid on bonds at home and the interest received on foreign reserves. The costs of sterilization policy have been clearly reflected in country experience. Both Colombia and Chile experienced high sterilization costs that led them to move to a capital Control regime. Other forms of sterilization through reserve requirements and taxes on capital inflows are discussed elsewhere is this paper. They have been successful in some countries (such as Chile, Colombia and Thailand) in altering the average maturity of the capital inflow, but not the total capital flow. The experience of Chile is particularly interesting in relation to the constraints on monetary policy in a small, open economy with a liberalized capital account (see Annex 1 for a more detailed discussion of the Chilean experience). The conflict between controlling domestic inflation (even with fiscal accounts in balance) and preventing a sharp appreciation of the real exchange rate in the 34
  • 35.
    context of largecapital inflows, prompted Chile to search for greater flexibility of monetary policy through the implementation of controls on capital inflows. The Chilean controls appear to have provided a ‘wedge’ between domestic and international rates that provided greater scope for authorities to target domestic inflation, while avoiding the costs of sterilization (although it must be noted that other costs were incurred, see Annex 1). The above measures can only be used in the short-run. Their continuance can lead to agents developing new ways of bypassing these regulations. In the long run, the only solution is to speed up the financial and overall reform, so that outflows can be liberalized so that the two way movement of capital takes care of financial intermediation, without the necessity for some of these measures. The process would be aided by a flexible exchange rate policy. Monetary policy would get some autonomy in countries where the conditions are right to operate an exchange rate band. Exchange Rate Policy The significance of a flexible exchange rate goes up for an economy with an open capital account as the influence of international variables is transmitted more quickly than in an economy with a relatively closed capital account. What is important for an open capital? This is the general case. The case study of India illustrates that the huge stock of ad hoc treasury bills were available for sterilization without increasing the stock of public debt. Account management is 35
  • 36.
    that exchange ratepolicy should be flexible, with market participants bearing exchange risk instead of the balance sheet of a central bank. Furthermore, the Resulting uncertainty from a flexible exchange rate may discourage short-term flows. Exchange rate uncertainty may discourage short-term flows. The maintenance of a pegged exchange rate by the Thai authorities in the 1995-1997 periods constrained policy making, discouraged hedging by market participants and reinforced capital inflows. It also provided a fixed target for speculators who were quick to observe the inconsistency between an interest rate defense of the baht peg and the health of the financial sector. A further advantage of allowing greater exchange rate flexibility is that the appreciation of the exchange rate is which is likely to occur through an appreciation of the nominal exchange rate and not through higher inflation. This gives room for pursuing autonomous monetary policy. It would force market participants to hedge their positions and this would be a beneficial development for foreign exchange market development. A drawback of a floating exchange rate regime is that it may be associated with high volatility, which may damage the growth of strategic sectors like non-traditional exports. Country experience suggests that as capital account convertibility has progressed, countries have adopted more flexible exchange rate regimes. Of the countries surveyed in Annex 2, Colombia, Peru, Chile, Uganda, and Korea have all opted to introduce greater flexibility into their exchange rate regime. Only, Argentina with its currency board regime and Malaysia, which pegged the ringgit to the dollar as part of its 36
  • 37.
    adjustment policy afterthe Asian crisis, have reverted to inflexible regimes. The particular nature of the Argentine and Malaysian experiences should be noted. Argentina sought credibility for its macroeconomic policy stance after prolonged economic crises in the 1980s and the currency board was the surest Method of acquiring this in international markets. Malaysia initiated its pegged regime in the context of a broad policy of capital controls on outflows, which helped ensure its maintenance. Thus, the general experience of capital account liberalization is that a greater degree of exchange rate flexibility is required, even if this takes the form of a currency band which helps reduce the volatility associated with free floating regimes. It is for this reason that many countries such as Israel, Colombia, Chile and Mexico adopted an intermediate regime of an exchange rate band. Exchange rate bands can be implemented in countries that have depth in the foreign exchange market and the market is well developed so that two-way expectations can drive the exchange rate. It is an intermediate regime, in which monetary policy can be used for domestic objectives most of the time and but will be assigned to the external objective when necessary to avoid what might be a serious misalignment. Correction of exchange rate misalignments cannot be safely left to the market. The choice of an appropriate exchange rate involves a trade-off between the benefit of targeting inflation and the external competitiveness of a country. Actual policy will have to be a mix of both these objectives as either extreme is harmful to a country. Increased capital 37
  • 38.
    Mobility limits thepossibility of targeting the real exchange rate and therefore allowing the exchange rate to fluctuate within a band is a desirable policy. A credible announcement by the authorities that they will intervene to keep the exchange rate within the band will encourage market corrections or limitations to the misalignments without diverting monetary policy from its domestic objectives. Refraining from intervening continually in the market will discourage complacent traders who prevent market corrections through their behavior. At the margin of the band, as part of official policy, the central bank is expected to intervene but not necessary as market can carry out the corrective speculation. With this policy the central bank can allow the market to work and yet keep the surprise element in its policy. The central bank can also from time to time review its own choice of the equilibrium exchange rate and signal a major change is warranted by its own intervention and moving the parity around which the exchange rate is fluctuating. Whether countries opt for a managed floating exchange rate regime or an exchange rate band depending upon their own circumstances, flexibility of the exchange rate is necessary with an open capital account. 38
  • 39.
    • Sequencing Currentand Capital Account Liberalization McKinnon (1973 and 1982) Frenkel (1982) and Edwards (1984) made a case for liberalizing the capital account following the opening of the current account and the domestic financial system. According to McKinnon if the opposite sequencing were followed, excessive capital inflows would result in a substantial appreciation of the real exchange rate, which would then Hamper the opening up of the current account. Arguments for a simultaneous opening of the current and capital account have been advanced by Little, Scitovsky, and Scot, (1970), Michaely, (1986) and Krueger (1984). Since many developing economies have signed Article VIII agreements with the IMF, the issue of sequencing current and capital account liberalization needs further qualification as to the time period between current and capital account liberalization as the capital account can be porous because of a liberalized current account. It also needs to focus on the type of restrictions needed on the current account to avoid the loss of capital in the transition stage. Inflation Rate Among central bankers there is an increasing belief that an inflation rate in the low, single-digit range is a desirable objective of policy. The achievement of this policy will require central banks to have greater independence and 39
  • 40.
    insulation from populistpressures. With an increasingly integrated world economy and low inflation rates in the industrial countries, it is necessary for developing countries to break inflationary expectations and achieve inflation rates not far out of line with those in the industrial countries. High rates of inflation are destabilizing and require high nominal and real rates of interest which have negative real effects and could reinforce capital inflows (Brazil). Conversely, artificially maintained low interest rates could induce large net outflows of capital. Financial Sector Reform A central component of any policy directed at promoting capital account liberalization is the reform and restructuring of the financial sector to avert inefficient allocations of capital. In an environment of liberalized capital flows, weaknesses of the financial system can cause macroeconomic instability and crises (Thailand, Indonesia, and Kenya). The choice is therefore between a careful reform of the financial system before or during the process of liberalization, or emergency reforms after a crisis. Banking systems remain weak in many Developing countries burdened either by interest rate controls or mandated lending to favored groups or firms. In addition, many systems have very high reserve requirements relative to international levels. Reducing these 40
  • 41.
    requirements diminishes theeffectiveness of monetary policy in the absence of indirect policy tools. Thus, the development of indirect tools such as open market operations and interest rates should become a key objective of policy. Reform must also encompass improved accounting standards, increased monitoring and surveillance of bank risk exposure, and prudential standards that conform to international standards (Basle Committee). Monetary Policy The development and deepening of financial markets following reform, also changes the context in which monetary policy is conducted. A move from direct monetary policy controls to indirect controls is desirable, as it avoids distortions in financial intermediation and is more flexible for policy purposes. In addition, the development of indirect controls also enables the central bank to more effectively carry out sterilization operations in capital inflow episodes. Appreciation of the exchange rate due to capital inflows diverts investment away from the tradable sector when in persists for a long time. Sterilization is needed to deal with this or it can be combined with other instruments such as reserve requirements, taxes or a partial liberalization of outflows. In small economies the financial markets lack of depth and it may be feasible to rely on more direct monetary policy tools. 41
  • 42.
    Exchange Rate Policy Exchange rate policy becomes even more central to policymaking concerns with moves towards capital account convertibility. Authorities must decide on the optimal degree of exchange rate flexibility with an aim to prevent either unsustainable appreciations of the real exchange rate that can undermine competitiveness or expensive interest rate defences of fixed rates and/or costly sterilization operations. The balance between these considerations is complex, although there is a general belief that exchange rate regimes have to be more Flexible under capital account convertibility. Current Account Balance Current account deficits are commonly found in developing countries, reflecting the use of global savings to achieve desired levels of growth and investment. Experience suggests that prudent limits must be set on expanding deficits. The counterpart of current account deficits are expanding external liabilities, and as the deficit rises debt servicing begins to account for an increasing proportion of external earnings that could be otherwise used to increase imports. Thus, high current account deficits may constrain growth by retarding importsas well as leading to fears of contraction and/or crisis. 42
  • 43.
    Foreign Exchange Reserves Withcapital account convertibility, the level of international reserves becomes a key consideration for policymakers. Reserves help to cushion the impact of cyclical changes in the balance of payments and help offset unanticipated shocks, which can lead to reversals of capital flows. Reserves also help sustain confidence in both domestic policy and exchange rate policy. The optimal level of reserves is of course contingent on a country’’ specific circumstances, including its balance of payments, exchange rate regime and access to international finance. Indicators of reserve adequacy should be derived from measures of import cover and debt servicing. Another important ratio to monitor is the ratio of short-term debt and portfolio stocks to reserves to guard against sudden depreciation. Lowering tariff barriers Reforming the trade regime to make it more open to the international economy is part of the structural reforms that should precede CAC. High tariffs, in addition to their allocative inefficiency, encourage direct investment in the economy that is not directed towards export markets, but rather towards ‘tariff 43
  • 44.
    jumping’. Lowering tariffsis therefore linked to the promotion of a diversified export base. Diversified export base A diversified export base helps cushion the economy from sudden terms of trade or other shocks that may emerge from dependence on a narrow range of exports. Such shocks have immediate effects upon the current account and with a loss of confidence in the country’s capacity to meet debt repayments or sustain the current rate of capital inflows, may drive a capital account crisis as well. Developing countries have traditionally been vulnerable to such shocks to the export sector, often arising from dependence on primary commodity exports. The process of promoting non-traditional exports can encompass promotion of domestic firms through some kind of industrial policy or through the encouragement of foreign direct investment. In the latter case, it is essential that countries promote FDI in exportable sectors. Current account liberalization can lead to a de facto liberalization of the capital account because it is possible for capital to leave through leads and lags. Kasekende et al. (1997) and Kimei et al. (1997) find evidence of significant capital flows through current account transactions and foreign exchange bureaus for Uganda and Tanzania. Kahn (1991) found substantial evidence of capital flight through the current account for South Africa. Some developing countries 44
  • 45.
    retain certain restrictionson the current account with Article VIII status.13 It is however difficult to gauge which restrictions achieve the objectives for which They have been set. This is an area for research. India maintained certain restrictions on the current account with Article VIII status to avoid the movement of capital through the current account because controls on the movement of capital by the resident sector have not been liberalized. Hence, certain preventive measures were built into the regulations relating to current account transactions. (In recent weeks some small steps have been made to liberalize this sector but the focus is still on micro management of exchange controls.) An attempt is made to capture the impact of opening of the current account on the porosity of the capital account. Estimates of misinvoicing of trade data based on partner country comparison of the country with industrialized countries for a select sample of four countries is revealing. External Sector Indicators Recent developments in the balance of payment (BoP) indicate continuing resilience of the external sector even as the Indian economy is entering an expansionary phase of the business cycle. There has been an emergence of a current account deficit (CAD) in 2004-05 and 2005-06 after surpluses in the 45
  • 46.
    preceding three years(2001-04). For a developing country like India, imports of raw materials, intermediates, capital goods, technology and services hold the key to scaling up growth in the medium-term. It is important to recognize that current BoP has significantly improved over 1990-91. Current Account Deficit Since the crisis of 1990-91, during which a CAD of 3 per cent of GDP turned out to be unsustainable, the appropriate level of the CAD for India has been the subject of considerable deliberation. The appropriate level of the CAD is a dynamic concept and cannot be fixed in time, or cast in stone. The openness is based on the increase in the current receipts to GDP ratio to 24.5 per cent in 2005-06, which is substantially higher than the ratio of 8.0 per cent in 1990-91. Current receipts in 2005-06 pay for 95 per cent of current payments, up from 72 per cent in 1990-91. Acceleration in the growth of current earnings economises on the need to seek access to International financial markets and strengthens the ability to run a higher CAD (and achieve higher growth) without encountering a financing constraint. Stepping up the growth of current receipts is essential for sustaining a higher CAD. Viability of the CAD is a function of the availability of normal capital flows, as opposed to exceptional financing. Net capital flows have regularly exceeded the CAD requirements by a fair measure, enabling 46
  • 47.
    large accretions tothe reserves. During 2005-06, the CAD has been comfortably financed by net capital flows with over US$ 15 billion added to the foreign exchange reserves. Compositional shifts in favour of foreign investment have actually strengthened the economy's absorptive capacity. The share of non-debt creating flows in net capital flows has, in fact, risen from 1 per cent in 1990-91 to nearly 50 per cent in 2004-05. The operating ‘viability’ criterion for determining the access to capital flows is the ability to service external liabilities as embodied in a low ratio of debt service payments to current receipts. The debt service ratio (DSR) has fallen to as low as 10.2 per cent in 2005-06 and the ratio of the external debt stock to GDP was a modest 15.8 per cent. The DSR could safely be in the range of 10-15 per cent. If the ratio of current account deficit to GDP is regarded as the target variable, the ratio of Current receipts to GDP can be regarded as the instrument variable. Accordingly, a sustainable current account deficit is dependent on the current receipts to GDP ratio. A rising current receipts to GDP ratio will enable a higher current account deficit which would enable a higher investment ratio. Given the present CR/GDP ratio of 24.5 per cent, the CR/CP ratio of 95 per cent and a debt service ratio in the range of 10-15 per cent, a CAD/GDP ratio of 3 per cent could be comfortably financed. Should the CAD/GDP ratio rise substantially over 3 per cent there would be a need for policy action. 47
  • 48.
    Limitation of theStudy: The analysis will be purely based on the primary and secondary data. The primary data comprise only of feedback collected from retail investors. It will not include institutional investors. The currency future is a new concept. 48
  • 49.
    Conclusion The process ofmacro economic reforms which ushered in 1991 has evolved slowly but steadily over the last one and half decade contributing for building stronger Indian economy. The next major step in this direction would be Indian opting for Capital Account Convertibility because it continues to be a desirable objective for providing another growth impetus for Indian economy as whole and Indian companies in particular. Though there are certain caveats like it may lead to aggressive moves by international players ( by exercising their financial muscle) and further intensify the competition for domestic companies but a carefully drafted policy suitable to Indian requirement and steady implementation of it would minimize ill effects and maximize the gains. 49
  • 50.
    Bibliography Report of theRBI-SEBI standing technical committee on exchange traded Currency futures) 2008 Recent Development in International Currency Market by: Lucjan T. Orlowski) Websites: http://www.google.com http://www.scribd.com http://www.management paradise.com http://www.wikipedia.com http://www..com http://www.sebi.gov.in http://www.bloomberg.com 50