Peripartum
cardiomyopathy
Dr. Somnath Mukhopadhay
It took 80 years to be recognized!
 Pregnancy associated CMP
 Meadow’s Syndrome
 Zaria Syndrome
 Postpartum myocardiosis
 Peripartum CMP
Definition
 2010 ESC Group defined PPCM as an idiopathic cardiomyopathy with
following:
1. Development of HF toward the end of pregnancy or within 5 months following
delivery.
2. Absence of another identifiable cause for the HF.
3. LV systolic dysfunction with an EF less than 45%. The LV may or may not be
dilated.
Epidemiology
 1:100 in Zaria, Nigeria (local Hausa custom of eating Kanwa, a dry lake salt
for 40 days after delivery, may lead to hypervolemia, HTN and finally PPCM)
 1:300 in Haiti.
 1:20,000 in Japan.
 1:4025 in India (acc. to latest data on 23/3/2018)
 Global incidence increased, may be due to improved diagnosis.
 Increased maternal age, Pre-eclampsia, maternal CV risk factors and multiple
gestations are other causes of raised incidence.
Etiology : unknown, multifactorial
 Final common pathway – increased oxidative stress, cleavage of prolactin to
angiostatic NT 16 kDA fragment and impaired VEGF signalling.
 Angiogenic imbalance : reduced VEGF in late gestation due to upregulated
sFLT1.
 Prolactin : 16K PRL causes endothelial damage and myocardial dysfunction.
 Inflammatory cytokines : increased TNF, IL-6, CRP.
 Myocarditis : role is uncertain.
 Abnormal immune response: escaped fetal cell lodge in cardiac tissue.
 Genetic predisposition: GNB3 has polymorphism of C825T
 Hemodynamic factor: exaggerated response of LV remodelling & hypertrophy.
Risk factors
 Age more than 30 years.
 African descent.
 Pregnancy with multiple fetus.
 History of PE/eclampsia/ postpartum HTN.
 Cocaine abuse.
 More than 4 weeks oral tocolytics with beta agonists like terbutaline.
 Relationship with DM is confounded by other risk factors.
 Selenium deficiency has conflicting data.
Clinical manifestation
 Timing : rare before 36 weeks.
 Sign/symptoms of HF.
 Initial diagnosis may be delayed since nonspecific fatigue, SOB and pedal
oedema simulates normal pregnancy.
 LV thrombus was seen in echocardiography in 16 out of 100 patients with
mean LVEF of 26% in a series.
Diagnosis
 LVEF<45% was added in definition to prevent inclusion of disorders those
mimic systolic HF like accelerated HTN, pulmonary embolism, systemic
infection, severe diastolic dysfunction, amniotic fluid embolism or pre-
eclampsia.
 BNP/CXR/CMRI/EMB/catheterization – only in selected cases.
 Viral/bacterial culture or viral titre like Coxsackie B are not indicated.
 Variable presence of LGE reflects diverse process. Persistence of LGE denotes
poor recovery.
 No pathognomonic EMB finding is seen ,till now, in PPCM.
Management : HF treatment
 Oxygen supplementation and assisted ventilation as per need.
 Optimization of preload.
 Hemodynamic support: inotropes, vasopressor.
 Symptomatic relief: diuretics.
 When possible, institute chronic therapies to improve long term outcome.
 15% to 20% with PPHF carry mutation known to induce CMP.
 Patient with genetic anomaly may have a predisposition to develop HF
triggered by physiological stress of pregnancy and delivery.
Arrhythmia management
 Arrhythmia is seen in 18.7% patients in a large inpatient database study of
9841 hospitalizations. 4.2% are having VT, 2.2% are having cardiac arrest.
 Smaller series revealed 20% to 25% cardiac arrest.
 Atrial fibrillation is usually seen in 3.1% to 11.9% of patients.
 Specific indications for ICD are not established in PPCM. 20% to 70% PPCM
usually recovers to normal by 3 to 12 months. So ICD is to be deferred, so also
CRT.
 Wearable defibrillator again is not without its risk or concern.
Anticoagulation issues
 The data for using anticoagulation is inconclusive for reducing events or
mortality. Exception is bromocriptine treated PPCM patients as MI/stroke
occurred with bromocriptine.
 LV systolic dysfunction with or without HF, without LV thrombus or other
indications, anticoagulation is not recommended recently.
 Definite indication of anticoagulation in PPCM and sinus rhythm is
1. Intracardiac thrombus.
2. Evidence of systemic embolism.
Advanced management
 MCS should be considered as bridge to bridge or bridge to recovery.
 Temporary device should always be preferred.
 Venoarterial ECMO may lead to increased prolactin. In these cases
bromocriptine (10mg BD) is helpful.
 Heart transplant in PPCM has worse outcome. Increased mortality, increased
rejection, poor graft survival and increased rate of re-implantation occurred
in different studies.
 Immunosuppression : not recommended.
 IVIg : efficacy is not confirmed.
 Apheresis and treatment with miRNA 146a are upcoming.
Role of bromocriptine
 Reduces prolactin production by dopamine agonist action.
 Role is controversial. May improve outcome by eliminating the cleaved formof
prolactin despite the activation of the cleaving enzyme.
 BRO-HF concluded that it was independently associated greater LV functional
recovery at 6 months and at long term follow up.
 Dose : 2.5mg twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by 2.5 mg once daily for 6
weeks.
 2019 ESC position statement from HF Association gave weak recommendation
and suggested Cabergoline as an alternative.
Delivery
 Hemodynamically stable : vaginal delivery with epidural anaesthesia.
 Hemodynamic instability: planned CS with central neuraxial anaesthesia.
 Early delivery is not required if maternal and fetal conditions are stable.
Breastfeeding
 Prevention of lactation is needed for severe HF due to harmful effects of
prolactin subfragments and high metabolic demand of lactation and
breastfeeding.
 If clinically stable then breastfeeding can be done as long as it is compatible
with heart failure treatment.
 If breastfeeding is decided then ACEI/ARB should be avoided.
Contraception must be reliable
 Persistent LV dysfunction can lead to high risk of recurrence.
 Sterilization may be required for patient and/or partner.
 Oestrogen containing contraceptives are avoided due to enhanced risk of
thromboembolism.
Prognosis
 Recovery of LV function usually takes 6 months but may take even 5 years.
 Mortality : 3% to 9.6%.
 Complete recovery-50%; persistent symptom-25%; complication-25%.
 Recovered patients may have subtle systolic or diastolic dysfunction with
reduction of maximum exercise capacity.
 Extra-cardiac morbidity may occur in the form of brain injury, CVA or
cardiopulmonary arrest.
 Persistent LVEF > 50% for more than 6 months can allow stepwise weaning of
HF therapy.
 Echocardiography should be done 6 monthly.
Adverse prognostic factor
 Increased NYHA classes.
 LVEF </=25%.
 Black race.
 Indigent status.
 Multiparity.
 30 to 35 years of age.
Predictors of persistent LV Dysfunction
 LVEF <30%.
 Fractional shortening < 20%.
 LVIDd >/= 6 cm.
 Reduced RV function.
 Raised troponin-T.
 Black race.
 Diagnosed during pregnancy.
Thank you

Peripartum cardiomyopathy

  • 1.
  • 2.
    It took 80years to be recognized!  Pregnancy associated CMP  Meadow’s Syndrome  Zaria Syndrome  Postpartum myocardiosis  Peripartum CMP
  • 3.
    Definition  2010 ESCGroup defined PPCM as an idiopathic cardiomyopathy with following: 1. Development of HF toward the end of pregnancy or within 5 months following delivery. 2. Absence of another identifiable cause for the HF. 3. LV systolic dysfunction with an EF less than 45%. The LV may or may not be dilated.
  • 4.
    Epidemiology  1:100 inZaria, Nigeria (local Hausa custom of eating Kanwa, a dry lake salt for 40 days after delivery, may lead to hypervolemia, HTN and finally PPCM)  1:300 in Haiti.  1:20,000 in Japan.  1:4025 in India (acc. to latest data on 23/3/2018)  Global incidence increased, may be due to improved diagnosis.  Increased maternal age, Pre-eclampsia, maternal CV risk factors and multiple gestations are other causes of raised incidence.
  • 5.
    Etiology : unknown,multifactorial  Final common pathway – increased oxidative stress, cleavage of prolactin to angiostatic NT 16 kDA fragment and impaired VEGF signalling.  Angiogenic imbalance : reduced VEGF in late gestation due to upregulated sFLT1.  Prolactin : 16K PRL causes endothelial damage and myocardial dysfunction.  Inflammatory cytokines : increased TNF, IL-6, CRP.  Myocarditis : role is uncertain.  Abnormal immune response: escaped fetal cell lodge in cardiac tissue.  Genetic predisposition: GNB3 has polymorphism of C825T  Hemodynamic factor: exaggerated response of LV remodelling & hypertrophy.
  • 6.
    Risk factors  Agemore than 30 years.  African descent.  Pregnancy with multiple fetus.  History of PE/eclampsia/ postpartum HTN.  Cocaine abuse.  More than 4 weeks oral tocolytics with beta agonists like terbutaline.  Relationship with DM is confounded by other risk factors.  Selenium deficiency has conflicting data.
  • 7.
    Clinical manifestation  Timing: rare before 36 weeks.  Sign/symptoms of HF.  Initial diagnosis may be delayed since nonspecific fatigue, SOB and pedal oedema simulates normal pregnancy.  LV thrombus was seen in echocardiography in 16 out of 100 patients with mean LVEF of 26% in a series.
  • 8.
    Diagnosis  LVEF<45% wasadded in definition to prevent inclusion of disorders those mimic systolic HF like accelerated HTN, pulmonary embolism, systemic infection, severe diastolic dysfunction, amniotic fluid embolism or pre- eclampsia.  BNP/CXR/CMRI/EMB/catheterization – only in selected cases.  Viral/bacterial culture or viral titre like Coxsackie B are not indicated.  Variable presence of LGE reflects diverse process. Persistence of LGE denotes poor recovery.  No pathognomonic EMB finding is seen ,till now, in PPCM.
  • 9.
    Management : HFtreatment  Oxygen supplementation and assisted ventilation as per need.  Optimization of preload.  Hemodynamic support: inotropes, vasopressor.  Symptomatic relief: diuretics.  When possible, institute chronic therapies to improve long term outcome.  15% to 20% with PPHF carry mutation known to induce CMP.  Patient with genetic anomaly may have a predisposition to develop HF triggered by physiological stress of pregnancy and delivery.
  • 10.
    Arrhythmia management  Arrhythmiais seen in 18.7% patients in a large inpatient database study of 9841 hospitalizations. 4.2% are having VT, 2.2% are having cardiac arrest.  Smaller series revealed 20% to 25% cardiac arrest.  Atrial fibrillation is usually seen in 3.1% to 11.9% of patients.  Specific indications for ICD are not established in PPCM. 20% to 70% PPCM usually recovers to normal by 3 to 12 months. So ICD is to be deferred, so also CRT.  Wearable defibrillator again is not without its risk or concern.
  • 11.
    Anticoagulation issues  Thedata for using anticoagulation is inconclusive for reducing events or mortality. Exception is bromocriptine treated PPCM patients as MI/stroke occurred with bromocriptine.  LV systolic dysfunction with or without HF, without LV thrombus or other indications, anticoagulation is not recommended recently.  Definite indication of anticoagulation in PPCM and sinus rhythm is 1. Intracardiac thrombus. 2. Evidence of systemic embolism.
  • 12.
    Advanced management  MCSshould be considered as bridge to bridge or bridge to recovery.  Temporary device should always be preferred.  Venoarterial ECMO may lead to increased prolactin. In these cases bromocriptine (10mg BD) is helpful.  Heart transplant in PPCM has worse outcome. Increased mortality, increased rejection, poor graft survival and increased rate of re-implantation occurred in different studies.  Immunosuppression : not recommended.  IVIg : efficacy is not confirmed.  Apheresis and treatment with miRNA 146a are upcoming.
  • 13.
    Role of bromocriptine Reduces prolactin production by dopamine agonist action.  Role is controversial. May improve outcome by eliminating the cleaved formof prolactin despite the activation of the cleaving enzyme.  BRO-HF concluded that it was independently associated greater LV functional recovery at 6 months and at long term follow up.  Dose : 2.5mg twice daily for 2 weeks, followed by 2.5 mg once daily for 6 weeks.  2019 ESC position statement from HF Association gave weak recommendation and suggested Cabergoline as an alternative.
  • 14.
    Delivery  Hemodynamically stable: vaginal delivery with epidural anaesthesia.  Hemodynamic instability: planned CS with central neuraxial anaesthesia.  Early delivery is not required if maternal and fetal conditions are stable.
  • 15.
    Breastfeeding  Prevention oflactation is needed for severe HF due to harmful effects of prolactin subfragments and high metabolic demand of lactation and breastfeeding.  If clinically stable then breastfeeding can be done as long as it is compatible with heart failure treatment.  If breastfeeding is decided then ACEI/ARB should be avoided.
  • 16.
    Contraception must bereliable  Persistent LV dysfunction can lead to high risk of recurrence.  Sterilization may be required for patient and/or partner.  Oestrogen containing contraceptives are avoided due to enhanced risk of thromboembolism.
  • 17.
    Prognosis  Recovery ofLV function usually takes 6 months but may take even 5 years.  Mortality : 3% to 9.6%.  Complete recovery-50%; persistent symptom-25%; complication-25%.  Recovered patients may have subtle systolic or diastolic dysfunction with reduction of maximum exercise capacity.  Extra-cardiac morbidity may occur in the form of brain injury, CVA or cardiopulmonary arrest.  Persistent LVEF > 50% for more than 6 months can allow stepwise weaning of HF therapy.  Echocardiography should be done 6 monthly.
  • 18.
    Adverse prognostic factor Increased NYHA classes.  LVEF </=25%.  Black race.  Indigent status.  Multiparity.  30 to 35 years of age.
  • 19.
    Predictors of persistentLV Dysfunction  LVEF <30%.  Fractional shortening < 20%.  LVIDd >/= 6 cm.  Reduced RV function.  Raised troponin-T.  Black race.  Diagnosed during pregnancy.
  • 20.