2. Revocation of an environmental permit
Temporary or permanent closure
Fines and Penalties
◦ Note that only with fines can you
adjust the sanction to fit the
violation. The rest are all or nothing
3. Twobasic approaches to
assessing fines and penalties
◦ Gestalt approach: “It feels like a
$10,000 case”
◦ Penalty policy approach: uses
guidance to more objectively
determine the penalty
Enforcement Sensitive and
Confidential 3
4. Based on intuitive sense of what the case is
worth
No standards or guidance
No documentation
Hard to explain to violator or management
Hard to explain to a judge
Hard to maintain consistency from one
enforcement person to another
Hard to train new enforcement personnel
Enforcement Sensitive and
Confidential 4
5. Penalty calculation can be
documented and reviewed
◦ Review function particularly important to
monitor how policy is working in practice
Easier to train new employees
Easier to maintain consistency
Easier to explain to violator
Easier to explain to a judge
Transparancy
Avoids Creating „Secret Law‟
5
6. Positional Bargaining
◦ Gestalt approach supports positional
bargaining
◦ Arbitrary positions
◦ Hard to reach agreement
Enforcement Sensitive and
Confidential 6
7. Principled negotiations supported by
penalty guidance
◦ You can show defendant why you think
the penalty should be $500,000.
◦ Focus on the reasons, not the numbers
◦ If you can agree on the reasons, it much
easier to come up with a number both
sides can agree to.
7
8. Totally
objective component of
the penalty.
◦ Anyone using the data you have will
come to the same answer
◦ Even a good penalty policy will have
some flexibility such there will be
variations from one person to
another.
8
Editor's Notes
Judges still use this approach.
Judges still use this approach.
Fairness argument very strongly engrained in Western society. Big companies complained when President Ronald Reagan’s EPA leaders starting gutting the enforcement program.Judges very supportive.