SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Automotive industry

From crisis to restructuring
  Rewriting the rules of
   automotive industry
The second revolution



The rise of
 General Motors


         By Masters Division - Facoltà di
              Economia di Torino
Trying to create an automotive monopoly
                  or trust

  William C. Durant organized a
  series of secret meeting in Detroit
  and New York attended by Henry
  Ford and other leading producers to
  discuss a giant merger, in 1908.
                             1908.
  JP Morgan & Co was interested in
  financing an automotive industry
  trust “to save it from death by
  competition”
  competition”.
               By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                    Economia di Torino
General Motors

Negotiation reached a final stage when Ford
demanded cash instead of stock in the new
company.
company.
He would sell for 3 million $ but would not
merge.
merge.
Having reached a stalemate, the deal died.
                                     died.
A few days later, on September 8 1908, W.
              later,                 1908,
Durant incorporated a holding company,
selecting the name General Motors

             By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                  Economia di Torino
GM had no choice
Ford held nearly half of the market during the
1910s
1910s.
With most first time buyer still attracted to Ford’s
low-
low-priced Model T, GM had no choice but to
look for consumers considering the
replacement of older vehicles with newer
one.
one.
Rich people could be counted on to buy the
latest, most luxurious, most powerful cars, but
those customers amounted to perhaps 20.000 a
                                           20.
year, and GM had plenty of competitors for
their business.
      business.
                By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                     Economia di Torino
BUICK GENERAL MOTORS (1920)




     By Masters Division - Facoltà di
          Economia di Torino
A change was needed
GM future was especially shaky in 1921. GM
                                      1921.
sold only 200.000 cars and trucks, only the 12%
          200.                              12%
of the market.
       market.
Worse, the outlook was discouraging: the
                             discouraging:
number of first time buyer in US seemed to be
stabilized at a bit over 500.000 a year and
                          500.
appeared likely to slip.
                   slip.
Besides, Ford had secured a lock on first
time buyers by pricing its vehicles much lower
than any other company included GM.
                                 GM.

              By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                   Economia di Torino
CHEVROLET GENERAL MOTORS (1920)




     By Masters Division - Facoltà di
          Economia di Torino
The turnaround

While other companies floundered and failed in
the 1920s and 1930s, GM figured out how to sell
more cars, a lot more.
The turnaround started when GM president
Pierre du Pont hired engineering consultants
in 1921 to independently evaluate the
company’s eleven models, which were marketed
under seven nameplates.
Their conclusion was devastating: quality was
poor and pricing illogical.

              By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                   Economia di Torino
Outmoded pre-war designs
         pre-
Only two of the company’s
seven nameplates – Buick and
Cadillac – had favourable
consumer recognition for high
quality.
quality.

Chevrolet,     Oakland   and
Oldsmobile      were   selling
outmoded pre-war designs
             pre-
with poor reputation.
           reputation.
              By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                   Economia di Torino
CADILLAC GENERAL MOTORS (1933)




     By Masters Division - Facoltà di
          Economia di Torino
Many misguided acquisitions

  GM had to many nameplates because its
  first president, W Durant, bought every
  company he could and then granted
  each of them nearly total autonomy in
  setting prices.
          prices.
  Two weeks after incorporating GM (1908)
                                       1908)
  Durant began a buying binge, believing
  that diversification minimized risk.
                                 risk.

               By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                    Economia di Torino
Alfred P. Sloan

When Du Pont took control of GM in 1921,
                                   1921,
Alfred P. Sloan was placed in charge to
implement         the        consultant’s
recommendations.
recommendations. Sloan
- scrapped two brands,
- repositioned the prices of the
surviving models to eliminate overlap,
- selected prices to “place GM at the
top of each price range”.
                  range”
            By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                 Economia di Torino
ALFRED SLOAN (CEO GM)




By Masters Division - Facoltà di
     Economia di Torino
…their second car.


Within a few years, Sloan strategy had
been proved correct. Ford sold most
people their first cars, but GM – offering
more features at somewhat higher prices -
sold most people their second car.



             By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                  Economia di Torino
GM understood consumer
       preferences
GM became the world’s largest
manufacturer because it understood
consumer preferences better than any
other corporation, and it shaped and
manipulated these preferences
successfully for more than a half-century.
                             half-century.



             By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                  Economia di Torino
Highly emotional product
Consumers in US and other rich countries hold
onto stoves and washing machines as long as
they operate reliably, perhaps for decades, but
dispose of perfect serviceable motor
vehicles every few years and replace them
with others that perform not much differently.
The decision to buy a new vehicle, as well as the
selection of the model to purchase, is highly
emotional.

               By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                    Economia di Torino
A ladder of consumption
GM’s marketing structure worked because
both reflected and shaped the American
class structure.
It had created a ladder of consumption in
which a person who owned a Buick was
instantly identified as belonging to
higher social class than a person who
owned a Chevrolet.

             By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                  Economia di Torino
Chevy for the masses…
GM’s strategy reflected brilliantly the
realities and the aspirations of the
American      families   and     corporate
advertisement listed products by price.
                                 price.
 Chevrolet was the car for the masses,
Cadillac for the aristocrats and the other
three cars for the growing middle classes
in between.
   between.

             By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                  Economia di Torino
DuPont formula
    When it took control of GM, DuPont
    installed its accounting system. The
                                system.
    fundamental measure of performance in
    GM was rate of return on invested capital



ROE = (Profit margin)*(Asset turnover)*(Equity multiplier)
= (Net profit/Sales)*(Sales/Assets)*(Assets/Equity)= (Net
Profit/Equity)
                     By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                          Economia di Torino
Profits, not volumes


Under DuPont management,
GM was not committed to sell a large
number of cars per year




           By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                Economia di Torino
Return on investment (ROI)

For the next several decade GM used the
rate of return on investment to monitor
the performance of its many divisions as
well as those of competitors.
Each operating unit was required to
demonstrate each month that its rate of
return met the companywide target of
20%.
            By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                 Economia di Torino
“Standard price”
GM established the so called “standard price”
that wished to receive for each of its product,
including 20 percent return on investment.
                               investment.
The corporation then forecast the number of
vehicle that could sell the coming year at the
standard price and ordered only that number to
be built.
   built.
The approach gave GM a high rate of return
year in and year out regardless of sales were
up or down in a particular year.
                             year.

              By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                   Economia di Torino
Let them compete
Had it engaged in aggressive price cutting,
GM might have driven every other carmaker
out of business.
        business.
Instead, GM used its dominant position in the
market to raise prices.
                 prices.
Having decided as early as 1937 that it could not
let its market share exceed 50 percent without
running in antitrust problems, GM was content
                     problems,
to let the other companies share the other 50
percent of the market.
                market.

               By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                    Economia di Torino
GM opened door to European and
          Japanese

One reason why foreign-owned companies
                 foreign-
successfully entered the US market in the late
1950s and again in the 1970s was that GM
opened the door to let them in.
Regarding half of the US market as it rightful
share, GM was happy to see healthy firms
competing for the other half.


               By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                    Economia di Torino
Ralph Nader
GM arrogance reached its peak
during the 1960s in its handling
           1960s
of the Ralph Nader.
             Nader.
Nader’s book, Unsafe at any
speed,
speed, published in 1965, 1965,
argued that the Big Three,
especially GM, were more
concerned with making higher
profits than in making their
product safe.
         safe.
Nader pulled examples from all
three of the major carmakers,
but most of his criticism was
directed at GM’s Chevrolet
Corvair.
Corvair.
              By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                   Economia di Torino
RALPH NADER




By Masters Division - Facoltà di
     Economia di Torino
CORVAIR GENERAL MOTORS (1960)




     By Masters Division - Facoltà di
          Economia di Torino
A smear campaign
Stung by Nader’s attack, GM officials
decided to fight back by smearing him.
Instead, they ended up making him a hero
and a potent long-term force in the
             long-
consumer safety movement.




            By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                 Economia di Torino
Investigation confirms Nader’s charges
                       Nader’s
            against Corvair

The record contained ample evidence that GM
officials knew about the Corvair’s tendency to
roll over but chose to produce it anyway.
                                    anyway.
- The first GM driver to test a Corvair
prototype rolled it over.
                     over.
- The first Ford driver to test a Corvair in 1960 –
companies routinely obtain early version of
competitors’ models – also rolled it over.
                                     over.


                By Masters Division - Facoltà di
                     Economia di Torino

More Related Content

What's hot

G E N E R A L M O T O R S
G E N E R A L  M O T O R SG E N E R A L  M O T O R S
G E N E R A L M O T O R S
vismitok
 
General Motors
General  MotorsGeneral  Motors
General Motors
shaggy911
 
General motors Strategic Mangement
General motors Strategic MangementGeneral motors Strategic Mangement
General motors Strategic Mangement
Arif K.K
 
Gm Internet Marketing
Gm Internet MarketingGm Internet Marketing
Gm Internet Marketing
Anil Kumar
 
Parte 1 first revolution [modalità compatibilità]
Parte 1 first revolution [modalità compatibilità]Parte 1 first revolution [modalità compatibilità]
Parte 1 first revolution [modalità compatibilità]
Mastero Marchettone
 
General Motor Strategic Management Analysis
General Motor Strategic Management AnalysisGeneral Motor Strategic Management Analysis
General Motor Strategic Management Analysis
Rashid Javed
 
General motors
General motorsGeneral motors
General motors
motaque
 
General Motors_Strategic Management
General Motors_Strategic ManagementGeneral Motors_Strategic Management
General Motors_Strategic Management
Soumyajit Sengupta
 
General motors
General motorsGeneral motors
General motors
Binod Hyoju
 
General motors
General motorsGeneral motors
General motors
Haroon Adil
 
Organisation case studies
Organisation case studiesOrganisation case studies
Organisation case studies
Pankaj Thakur
 
Gm corporation (long verrsion) copy (1)
Gm corporation (long verrsion)    copy (1)Gm corporation (long verrsion)    copy (1)
Gm corporation (long verrsion) copy (1)
changtraithanghai
 
Why General Motors Went Bankrupt
Why General Motors Went BankruptWhy General Motors Went Bankrupt
Why General Motors Went Bankrupt
SHASHIKANT KULKARNI
 
BOOK SUMMARY OF: Alfred Sloan\'s My Years With General Motors
BOOK SUMMARY OF: Alfred Sloan\'s My Years With General MotorsBOOK SUMMARY OF: Alfred Sloan\'s My Years With General Motors
BOOK SUMMARY OF: Alfred Sloan\'s My Years With General Motors
rrsagar
 
Case study of general motors
Case study of general motorsCase study of general motors
Case study of general motors
Vishal Dugar
 
FINU 607 GM Analysis
FINU 607 GM AnalysisFINU 607 GM Analysis
Chrysler
ChryslerChrysler
Chrysler
mandeep kaur
 
Chrysler After Bankruptcy
Chrysler After BankruptcyChrysler After Bankruptcy
Chrysler After Bankruptcy
M Dalton
 
Gm Presentation3
Gm  Presentation3Gm  Presentation3
Gm Presentation3
hasil zaheer
 
MBA 592 Ford Vs. General Motor's Master's Thesis power point
MBA 592 Ford Vs. General Motor's Master's Thesis power pointMBA 592 Ford Vs. General Motor's Master's Thesis power point
MBA 592 Ford Vs. General Motor's Master's Thesis power point
Steven Abdo
 

What's hot (20)

G E N E R A L M O T O R S
G E N E R A L  M O T O R SG E N E R A L  M O T O R S
G E N E R A L M O T O R S
 
General Motors
General  MotorsGeneral  Motors
General Motors
 
General motors Strategic Mangement
General motors Strategic MangementGeneral motors Strategic Mangement
General motors Strategic Mangement
 
Gm Internet Marketing
Gm Internet MarketingGm Internet Marketing
Gm Internet Marketing
 
Parte 1 first revolution [modalità compatibilità]
Parte 1 first revolution [modalità compatibilità]Parte 1 first revolution [modalità compatibilità]
Parte 1 first revolution [modalità compatibilità]
 
General Motor Strategic Management Analysis
General Motor Strategic Management AnalysisGeneral Motor Strategic Management Analysis
General Motor Strategic Management Analysis
 
General motors
General motorsGeneral motors
General motors
 
General Motors_Strategic Management
General Motors_Strategic ManagementGeneral Motors_Strategic Management
General Motors_Strategic Management
 
General motors
General motorsGeneral motors
General motors
 
General motors
General motorsGeneral motors
General motors
 
Organisation case studies
Organisation case studiesOrganisation case studies
Organisation case studies
 
Gm corporation (long verrsion) copy (1)
Gm corporation (long verrsion)    copy (1)Gm corporation (long verrsion)    copy (1)
Gm corporation (long verrsion) copy (1)
 
Why General Motors Went Bankrupt
Why General Motors Went BankruptWhy General Motors Went Bankrupt
Why General Motors Went Bankrupt
 
BOOK SUMMARY OF: Alfred Sloan\'s My Years With General Motors
BOOK SUMMARY OF: Alfred Sloan\'s My Years With General MotorsBOOK SUMMARY OF: Alfred Sloan\'s My Years With General Motors
BOOK SUMMARY OF: Alfred Sloan\'s My Years With General Motors
 
Case study of general motors
Case study of general motorsCase study of general motors
Case study of general motors
 
FINU 607 GM Analysis
FINU 607 GM AnalysisFINU 607 GM Analysis
FINU 607 GM Analysis
 
Chrysler
ChryslerChrysler
Chrysler
 
Chrysler After Bankruptcy
Chrysler After BankruptcyChrysler After Bankruptcy
Chrysler After Bankruptcy
 
Gm Presentation3
Gm  Presentation3Gm  Presentation3
Gm Presentation3
 
MBA 592 Ford Vs. General Motor's Master's Thesis power point
MBA 592 Ford Vs. General Motor's Master's Thesis power pointMBA 592 Ford Vs. General Motor's Master's Thesis power point
MBA 592 Ford Vs. General Motor's Master's Thesis power point
 

Viewers also liked

Integra Profile
Integra ProfileIntegra Profile
Integra Profile
Integraapparels
 
D10 bb 6
D10 bb 6D10 bb 6
D10 bb 6
abc co
 
Mal opp english_100527
Mal opp english_100527Mal opp english_100527
Mal opp english_100527
abc co
 
Integra profile
Integra profileIntegra profile
Integra profile
Integraapparels
 
Texas STaR Chart Presentation
Texas STaR Chart PresentationTexas STaR Chart Presentation
Texas STaR Chart Presentation
leblancr
 
Parte 3 third revolution [modalità compatibilità]
Parte 3 third revolution [modalità compatibilità]Parte 3 third revolution [modalità compatibilità]
Parte 3 third revolution [modalità compatibilità]
Mastero Marchettone
 
Phan mem quan ly khach san
Phan mem quan ly khach sanPhan mem quan ly khach san
Phan mem quan ly khach sanHuyHoang Pham
 
Puro Marketing
Puro MarketingPuro Marketing
Puro Marketing
branding2011
 
Gr 6 lesson 2 visual art
Gr 6 lesson 2 visual artGr 6 lesson 2 visual art
Gr 6 lesson 2 visual art
RobertBullwinkel
 
Eger keynote fresno arts summit 3 4 11
Eger keynote fresno arts summit 3 4 11Eger keynote fresno arts summit 3 4 11
Eger keynote fresno arts summit 3 4 11
RobertBullwinkel
 
Chpt 10 TFA Close Reading
Chpt 10 TFA Close Reading Chpt 10 TFA Close Reading
Chpt 10 TFA Close Reading
Faith Ong
 
Stratégie digital-cci-rennes-btob-btoc-2013
Stratégie digital-cci-rennes-btob-btoc-2013Stratégie digital-cci-rennes-btob-btoc-2013
Stratégie digital-cci-rennes-btob-btoc-2013Gregoire Lockhart
 

Viewers also liked (15)

Artícu
ArtícuArtícu
Artícu
 
Integra Profile
Integra ProfileIntegra Profile
Integra Profile
 
D10 bb 6
D10 bb 6D10 bb 6
D10 bb 6
 
Mal opp english_100527
Mal opp english_100527Mal opp english_100527
Mal opp english_100527
 
Integra profile
Integra profileIntegra profile
Integra profile
 
Texas STaR Chart Presentation
Texas STaR Chart PresentationTexas STaR Chart Presentation
Texas STaR Chart Presentation
 
Parte 3 third revolution [modalità compatibilità]
Parte 3 third revolution [modalità compatibilità]Parte 3 third revolution [modalità compatibilità]
Parte 3 third revolution [modalità compatibilità]
 
Phan mem quan ly khach san
Phan mem quan ly khach sanPhan mem quan ly khach san
Phan mem quan ly khach san
 
Puro Marketing
Puro MarketingPuro Marketing
Puro Marketing
 
Gr 6 lesson 2 visual art
Gr 6 lesson 2 visual artGr 6 lesson 2 visual art
Gr 6 lesson 2 visual art
 
Eger keynote fresno arts summit 3 4 11
Eger keynote fresno arts summit 3 4 11Eger keynote fresno arts summit 3 4 11
Eger keynote fresno arts summit 3 4 11
 
10
1010
10
 
Chpt 10 TFA Close Reading
Chpt 10 TFA Close Reading Chpt 10 TFA Close Reading
Chpt 10 TFA Close Reading
 
Ni visee managem
Ni visee managemNi visee managem
Ni visee managem
 
Stratégie digital-cci-rennes-btob-btoc-2013
Stratégie digital-cci-rennes-btob-btoc-2013Stratégie digital-cci-rennes-btob-btoc-2013
Stratégie digital-cci-rennes-btob-btoc-2013
 

Similar to Parte 2 second revolution [modalità compatibilità]

Automobile industry
Automobile industryAutomobile industry
Automobile industry
StudsPlanet.com
 
MAIN REPORT
MAIN REPORTMAIN REPORT
MAIN REPORT
NEHA CHANDEL
 
Gm
GmGm
Ford motor company FACTS
Ford motor company FACTSFord motor company FACTS
Ford motor company FACTS
Mohan Krishna
 
Ford and GM A Comparison of 2 Fortune 500 Companies
Ford and GM A Comparison of 2 Fortune 500 CompaniesFord and GM A Comparison of 2 Fortune 500 Companies
Ford and GM A Comparison of 2 Fortune 500 Companies
Leo de Sousa
 
Pep Boys Business Development Plan
Pep Boys Business Development PlanPep Boys Business Development Plan
Pep Boys Business Development Plan
Daniel St Germain
 
Selling cars in america
Selling cars in americaSelling cars in america
Selling cars in america
Angela Villegas
 
The car that changed America: how Henry Ford's 1908 Model T--the first mass-p...
The car that changed America: how Henry Ford's 1908 Model T--the first mass-p...The car that changed America: how Henry Ford's 1908 Model T--the first mass-p...
The car that changed America: how Henry Ford's 1908 Model T--the first mass-p...
accidentalfaith39
 
New frontiers-of-the-automobile-industry-exploring-geographies-201-516-1-299
New frontiers-of-the-automobile-industry-exploring-geographies-201-516-1-299New frontiers-of-the-automobile-industry-exploring-geographies-201-516-1-299
New frontiers-of-the-automobile-industry-exploring-geographies-201-516-1-299
Helenise1
 
Chysler fiat
Chysler fiatChysler fiat
Chysler fiat
Chunchi Irving
 
What happened to GM and how was its recovery
What happened to GM and how was its recovery�What happened to GM and how was its recovery�
What happened to GM and how was its recovery
Suzzanne Uhland
 
GM Strategic Audit
GM Strategic AuditGM Strategic Audit
GM Strategic Audit
Evan Smith
 
Ford Mondeo
Ford MondeoFord Mondeo
Ford Mondeo
tasmeen
 
Ford Mondeo Case Study Analisys
Ford Mondeo  Case Study AnalisysFord Mondeo  Case Study Analisys
Ford Mondeo Case Study Analisys
tasmeen
 
Toyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docx
Toyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docxToyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docx
Toyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docx
edwardmarivel
 
Ford motor company
Ford motor companyFord motor company
Ford motor company
Akshay Viyulie
 
Bmw case study reema iitm
Bmw case study reema iitmBmw case study reema iitm
Bmw case study reema iitm
Reema Mathew
 
Ford motors 2008
Ford motors 2008Ford motors 2008
Ford motors 2008
viggy vanshi
 

Similar to Parte 2 second revolution [modalità compatibilità] (18)

Automobile industry
Automobile industryAutomobile industry
Automobile industry
 
MAIN REPORT
MAIN REPORTMAIN REPORT
MAIN REPORT
 
Gm
GmGm
Gm
 
Ford motor company FACTS
Ford motor company FACTSFord motor company FACTS
Ford motor company FACTS
 
Ford and GM A Comparison of 2 Fortune 500 Companies
Ford and GM A Comparison of 2 Fortune 500 CompaniesFord and GM A Comparison of 2 Fortune 500 Companies
Ford and GM A Comparison of 2 Fortune 500 Companies
 
Pep Boys Business Development Plan
Pep Boys Business Development PlanPep Boys Business Development Plan
Pep Boys Business Development Plan
 
Selling cars in america
Selling cars in americaSelling cars in america
Selling cars in america
 
The car that changed America: how Henry Ford's 1908 Model T--the first mass-p...
The car that changed America: how Henry Ford's 1908 Model T--the first mass-p...The car that changed America: how Henry Ford's 1908 Model T--the first mass-p...
The car that changed America: how Henry Ford's 1908 Model T--the first mass-p...
 
New frontiers-of-the-automobile-industry-exploring-geographies-201-516-1-299
New frontiers-of-the-automobile-industry-exploring-geographies-201-516-1-299New frontiers-of-the-automobile-industry-exploring-geographies-201-516-1-299
New frontiers-of-the-automobile-industry-exploring-geographies-201-516-1-299
 
Chysler fiat
Chysler fiatChysler fiat
Chysler fiat
 
What happened to GM and how was its recovery
What happened to GM and how was its recovery�What happened to GM and how was its recovery�
What happened to GM and how was its recovery
 
GM Strategic Audit
GM Strategic AuditGM Strategic Audit
GM Strategic Audit
 
Ford Mondeo
Ford MondeoFord Mondeo
Ford Mondeo
 
Ford Mondeo Case Study Analisys
Ford Mondeo  Case Study AnalisysFord Mondeo  Case Study Analisys
Ford Mondeo Case Study Analisys
 
Toyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docx
Toyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docxToyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docx
Toyota  case  Mission  safety,  quality,  volume  .docx
 
Ford motor company
Ford motor companyFord motor company
Ford motor company
 
Bmw case study reema iitm
Bmw case study reema iitmBmw case study reema iitm
Bmw case study reema iitm
 
Ford motors 2008
Ford motors 2008Ford motors 2008
Ford motors 2008
 

Parte 2 second revolution [modalità compatibilità]

  • 1. Automotive industry From crisis to restructuring Rewriting the rules of automotive industry
  • 2. The second revolution The rise of General Motors By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 3. Trying to create an automotive monopoly or trust William C. Durant organized a series of secret meeting in Detroit and New York attended by Henry Ford and other leading producers to discuss a giant merger, in 1908. 1908. JP Morgan & Co was interested in financing an automotive industry trust “to save it from death by competition” competition”. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 4. General Motors Negotiation reached a final stage when Ford demanded cash instead of stock in the new company. company. He would sell for 3 million $ but would not merge. merge. Having reached a stalemate, the deal died. died. A few days later, on September 8 1908, W. later, 1908, Durant incorporated a holding company, selecting the name General Motors By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 5. GM had no choice Ford held nearly half of the market during the 1910s 1910s. With most first time buyer still attracted to Ford’s low- low-priced Model T, GM had no choice but to look for consumers considering the replacement of older vehicles with newer one. one. Rich people could be counted on to buy the latest, most luxurious, most powerful cars, but those customers amounted to perhaps 20.000 a 20. year, and GM had plenty of competitors for their business. business. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 6. BUICK GENERAL MOTORS (1920) By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 7. A change was needed GM future was especially shaky in 1921. GM 1921. sold only 200.000 cars and trucks, only the 12% 200. 12% of the market. market. Worse, the outlook was discouraging: the discouraging: number of first time buyer in US seemed to be stabilized at a bit over 500.000 a year and 500. appeared likely to slip. slip. Besides, Ford had secured a lock on first time buyers by pricing its vehicles much lower than any other company included GM. GM. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 8. CHEVROLET GENERAL MOTORS (1920) By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 9. The turnaround While other companies floundered and failed in the 1920s and 1930s, GM figured out how to sell more cars, a lot more. The turnaround started when GM president Pierre du Pont hired engineering consultants in 1921 to independently evaluate the company’s eleven models, which were marketed under seven nameplates. Their conclusion was devastating: quality was poor and pricing illogical. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 10. Outmoded pre-war designs pre- Only two of the company’s seven nameplates – Buick and Cadillac – had favourable consumer recognition for high quality. quality. Chevrolet, Oakland and Oldsmobile were selling outmoded pre-war designs pre- with poor reputation. reputation. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 11. CADILLAC GENERAL MOTORS (1933) By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 12. Many misguided acquisitions GM had to many nameplates because its first president, W Durant, bought every company he could and then granted each of them nearly total autonomy in setting prices. prices. Two weeks after incorporating GM (1908) 1908) Durant began a buying binge, believing that diversification minimized risk. risk. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 13. Alfred P. Sloan When Du Pont took control of GM in 1921, 1921, Alfred P. Sloan was placed in charge to implement the consultant’s recommendations. recommendations. Sloan - scrapped two brands, - repositioned the prices of the surviving models to eliminate overlap, - selected prices to “place GM at the top of each price range”. range” By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 14. ALFRED SLOAN (CEO GM) By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 15. …their second car. Within a few years, Sloan strategy had been proved correct. Ford sold most people their first cars, but GM – offering more features at somewhat higher prices - sold most people their second car. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 16. GM understood consumer preferences GM became the world’s largest manufacturer because it understood consumer preferences better than any other corporation, and it shaped and manipulated these preferences successfully for more than a half-century. half-century. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 17. Highly emotional product Consumers in US and other rich countries hold onto stoves and washing machines as long as they operate reliably, perhaps for decades, but dispose of perfect serviceable motor vehicles every few years and replace them with others that perform not much differently. The decision to buy a new vehicle, as well as the selection of the model to purchase, is highly emotional. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 18. A ladder of consumption GM’s marketing structure worked because both reflected and shaped the American class structure. It had created a ladder of consumption in which a person who owned a Buick was instantly identified as belonging to higher social class than a person who owned a Chevrolet. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 19. Chevy for the masses… GM’s strategy reflected brilliantly the realities and the aspirations of the American families and corporate advertisement listed products by price. price. Chevrolet was the car for the masses, Cadillac for the aristocrats and the other three cars for the growing middle classes in between. between. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 20. DuPont formula When it took control of GM, DuPont installed its accounting system. The system. fundamental measure of performance in GM was rate of return on invested capital ROE = (Profit margin)*(Asset turnover)*(Equity multiplier) = (Net profit/Sales)*(Sales/Assets)*(Assets/Equity)= (Net Profit/Equity) By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 21. Profits, not volumes Under DuPont management, GM was not committed to sell a large number of cars per year By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 22. Return on investment (ROI) For the next several decade GM used the rate of return on investment to monitor the performance of its many divisions as well as those of competitors. Each operating unit was required to demonstrate each month that its rate of return met the companywide target of 20%. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 23. “Standard price” GM established the so called “standard price” that wished to receive for each of its product, including 20 percent return on investment. investment. The corporation then forecast the number of vehicle that could sell the coming year at the standard price and ordered only that number to be built. built. The approach gave GM a high rate of return year in and year out regardless of sales were up or down in a particular year. year. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 24. Let them compete Had it engaged in aggressive price cutting, GM might have driven every other carmaker out of business. business. Instead, GM used its dominant position in the market to raise prices. prices. Having decided as early as 1937 that it could not let its market share exceed 50 percent without running in antitrust problems, GM was content problems, to let the other companies share the other 50 percent of the market. market. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 25. GM opened door to European and Japanese One reason why foreign-owned companies foreign- successfully entered the US market in the late 1950s and again in the 1970s was that GM opened the door to let them in. Regarding half of the US market as it rightful share, GM was happy to see healthy firms competing for the other half. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 26. Ralph Nader GM arrogance reached its peak during the 1960s in its handling 1960s of the Ralph Nader. Nader. Nader’s book, Unsafe at any speed, speed, published in 1965, 1965, argued that the Big Three, especially GM, were more concerned with making higher profits than in making their product safe. safe. Nader pulled examples from all three of the major carmakers, but most of his criticism was directed at GM’s Chevrolet Corvair. Corvair. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 27. RALPH NADER By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 28. CORVAIR GENERAL MOTORS (1960) By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 29. A smear campaign Stung by Nader’s attack, GM officials decided to fight back by smearing him. Instead, they ended up making him a hero and a potent long-term force in the long- consumer safety movement. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino
  • 30. Investigation confirms Nader’s charges Nader’s against Corvair The record contained ample evidence that GM officials knew about the Corvair’s tendency to roll over but chose to produce it anyway. anyway. - The first GM driver to test a Corvair prototype rolled it over. over. - The first Ford driver to test a Corvair in 1960 – companies routinely obtain early version of competitors’ models – also rolled it over. over. By Masters Division - Facoltà di Economia di Torino