The document discusses several topics around debates between different views: - Whether individual or team sports are more beneficial - If museums should prioritize entertainment or education - If governments should fund preserving endangered languages or if it's a waste of money - If governments or private companies should control scientific research - If stricter punishments or alternative solutions best improve road safety - If prison or education is a more effective solution to reducing crime For each debate, the document asks the reader to discuss both sides and give their own opinion.

1. PARAPHRASING

2. PARAPHRASING
• Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in
sports which are played in teams, like football, while other
people think that taking part in individual sports, like
tennis or swimming, is better.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

3. PARAPHRASING
• Some people think that museums should be enjoyable
places to entertain people, while others believe that the
purpose of museums is to educate.
• Discuss both views and give you own opinion.

4. PARAPHRASING
• Several languages are in danger of extinction because
they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some
people say that governments should spend public money
on saving these languages, while others believe that
would be a waste of money.
• Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

5. PARAPHRASING
• Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by
governments rather than private companies.
• Do you agree or disagree?

6. PARAPHRASING
• The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give
much stricter punishments for driving offences.
• What extent do you agree or disagree?

7. • Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the
problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to
provide people a better education.
• Do you agree or disagree?