ERROR TO
ESTABLISH A
PALESTINIAN
STATE?
Presentation by: Inna
Tobias Müller
Christian Brauckmann
Yes: Patricia Berlyn, from “Twelve Bad Arguments for a State of Palestin
An Original Essay Written for This Volue (2006)
Structering
 history
 12 bad arguments for a state
of palestine
 Conclusion
History
Biblical times
Hebrew and Arab
kingdoms
640- 1917
controlled
by muslim rulers
1917
British captured Palestine
Balfour- Declaration
WWII
Jewish population:
650.000
1947
Israel won war against
Arabs
1948
Foundation of Israel
History
1967
Israel won Six – Day -
War
1973
Jom – Kippur - War
1992
Rabin came to power
1993
Oslo Agreement
1995
Netanyahu new Prime
Minister
2004
Arafat died
History
2005
Arabs control Gaza/
Withdrawal of Israel
2006
War against Hezbolla
(Lebanon)
 1) Israel‘s occupation of Palestinian territory is
the cause of an Islamic Jihad
 Jihad
 World of muslims: Dar al-Islam (House of Islam),
Dar al-Harb (House of war)
 Policymakers have 2 options
Arguments against a State of
Palestine
 2) The US will benefit from
establishing a state of palestine and
win arab support for its war on terror
Palestine- Arabs (PA) sympathize with
US enemies
Two state solution will create a terroristic
Palestinian state
No chance for democracy
 3) It will rectify an historic injustice to the
Palestine-Arabs (PA)
 2000 years ago: Romans called the country
Palestine
 Balfour- Declaration
 British founded Jordan
 WWII
 1967: Six- Day- War
Arguments against a State of
Palestine
 4) It will satisfy the demands of the PA,
who will give up terrorism and war and
settledown to builduing a society
Aim of Hamas/Fatah/Hezbolla:
destruction of Israel
Israel does not exist on palestinian
maps
Goal of PA: reconquer Historic Palestine
PA not willing to co-exist beside Israel
 5) It will bring peace and stability to the Middle
East
 Every area from which Israel withdrew ist
administration is now a base for terrorism
 E.g.: borderzone of Lebanon, Gaza
 “There can be no peace without a Palestinian
state“ (C. Rice) but: „“There can be no peace
with(out) a Palestinian state“ (P. Berlyn)
Arguments against a State of
Palestine
 6) A state of Palestine will be demilitarized
and not a danger to Israel
 PA would not take agreements or treaties serious
 Signed agreement by PA concerning police force
 Agrrement: not moret han 8000 without heavy weapons
 Reality: 50. 000 with heavy weapons
 State of palestine never be demilitarized
 PA demand linked state between West Bank and
Gaza
 Heavy weapons and trained soldiers would come into
the state like it is in Gaza since 2005
 7) If a state of Palestine commits agression
against Israel, then Israel can take back the
land it gave away
 Difficult to regain the forfeited land
 UN would not accept
 8) If Israel does not cut away from regions with
large Arab pupulation, the Arabs will soon
become a majority and rule over the Jews
 Over-estimated number of population
 Reality: smaller Arab population and ongoing drop
in birthrate
 Israeli birthrate steady or rising
 9) It will secure the Human Rights of the PA
and solve the Arab refugee problem
 PA vote for Fatah/Hamas
 Fatah/Hamas do not care about Human Rights
Arguments against a State of
Palestine
 10) It will encourage civic and economic
development, raise standart of living and
bring contentment to the people
 In areas under PA control poverty increases
 The enormous international subsidies are
used for weapons and training of terrorists
 PA areas only have water and electricity
because Israel provides it
 Schools, TV, radio are there for propaganda
and recruitment of terrorists
 11) Israel must comply with the UN
Resoultions
 Israel not treated as UN- member
 No help when Israel is attacked by Arabs
 UN‘s terms of future: Isreali withdrawal from
unspecified “territories“
Arguments against a State of
Palestine
 12) It will win the respect of world
opinion for Israel
some opinions about Israel are fair
Some opinions are full of prejudices
against Israel and Jews in general
Israel is a victim of lies and false reports
by the media
Conclusion
 Giving up Israel = giving up history
 PA would destroy Jewish sights and relicts as
they have already done in Jerusalem
 Knowledge will be lost
 Two-state solution is no guarantee for peace

Palästina

  • 1.
    ERROR TO ESTABLISH A PALESTINIAN STATE? Presentationby: Inna Tobias Müller Christian Brauckmann Yes: Patricia Berlyn, from “Twelve Bad Arguments for a State of Palestin An Original Essay Written for This Volue (2006)
  • 2.
    Structering  history  12bad arguments for a state of palestine  Conclusion
  • 3.
    History Biblical times Hebrew andArab kingdoms 640- 1917 controlled by muslim rulers 1917 British captured Palestine Balfour- Declaration WWII Jewish population: 650.000 1947 Israel won war against Arabs 1948 Foundation of Israel
  • 4.
    History 1967 Israel won Six– Day - War 1973 Jom – Kippur - War 1992 Rabin came to power 1993 Oslo Agreement 1995 Netanyahu new Prime Minister 2004 Arafat died
  • 5.
    History 2005 Arabs control Gaza/ Withdrawalof Israel 2006 War against Hezbolla (Lebanon)
  • 6.
     1) Israel‘soccupation of Palestinian territory is the cause of an Islamic Jihad  Jihad  World of muslims: Dar al-Islam (House of Islam), Dar al-Harb (House of war)  Policymakers have 2 options
  • 7.
    Arguments against aState of Palestine  2) The US will benefit from establishing a state of palestine and win arab support for its war on terror Palestine- Arabs (PA) sympathize with US enemies Two state solution will create a terroristic Palestinian state No chance for democracy
  • 8.
     3) Itwill rectify an historic injustice to the Palestine-Arabs (PA)  2000 years ago: Romans called the country Palestine  Balfour- Declaration  British founded Jordan  WWII  1967: Six- Day- War
  • 9.
    Arguments against aState of Palestine  4) It will satisfy the demands of the PA, who will give up terrorism and war and settledown to builduing a society Aim of Hamas/Fatah/Hezbolla: destruction of Israel Israel does not exist on palestinian maps Goal of PA: reconquer Historic Palestine PA not willing to co-exist beside Israel
  • 10.
     5) Itwill bring peace and stability to the Middle East  Every area from which Israel withdrew ist administration is now a base for terrorism  E.g.: borderzone of Lebanon, Gaza  “There can be no peace without a Palestinian state“ (C. Rice) but: „“There can be no peace with(out) a Palestinian state“ (P. Berlyn)
  • 11.
    Arguments against aState of Palestine  6) A state of Palestine will be demilitarized and not a danger to Israel  PA would not take agreements or treaties serious  Signed agreement by PA concerning police force  Agrrement: not moret han 8000 without heavy weapons  Reality: 50. 000 with heavy weapons  State of palestine never be demilitarized  PA demand linked state between West Bank and Gaza  Heavy weapons and trained soldiers would come into the state like it is in Gaza since 2005
  • 12.
     7) Ifa state of Palestine commits agression against Israel, then Israel can take back the land it gave away  Difficult to regain the forfeited land  UN would not accept
  • 13.
     8) IfIsrael does not cut away from regions with large Arab pupulation, the Arabs will soon become a majority and rule over the Jews  Over-estimated number of population  Reality: smaller Arab population and ongoing drop in birthrate  Israeli birthrate steady or rising
  • 14.
     9) Itwill secure the Human Rights of the PA and solve the Arab refugee problem  PA vote for Fatah/Hamas  Fatah/Hamas do not care about Human Rights
  • 15.
    Arguments against aState of Palestine  10) It will encourage civic and economic development, raise standart of living and bring contentment to the people  In areas under PA control poverty increases  The enormous international subsidies are used for weapons and training of terrorists  PA areas only have water and electricity because Israel provides it  Schools, TV, radio are there for propaganda and recruitment of terrorists
  • 16.
     11) Israelmust comply with the UN Resoultions  Israel not treated as UN- member  No help when Israel is attacked by Arabs  UN‘s terms of future: Isreali withdrawal from unspecified “territories“
  • 17.
    Arguments against aState of Palestine  12) It will win the respect of world opinion for Israel some opinions about Israel are fair Some opinions are full of prejudices against Israel and Jews in general Israel is a victim of lies and false reports by the media
  • 18.
    Conclusion  Giving upIsrael = giving up history  PA would destroy Jewish sights and relicts as they have already done in Jerusalem  Knowledge will be lost  Two-state solution is no guarantee for peace