SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Angelica Jusino, MS ENVS Candidate and Tarek Abdel-Fattah
Christopher Newport University, Newport News, VA 23606
Figure 2. UV-Vis spectra of the 4-NP reduction by the 4 supports (no AuNP coating) after 2 hours.
After 2 hours
• Glass wool reduced after 2 hours
• Activated carbon adsorbed – did not reduce (no 300 peak)
• Neither zeolite adsorbed or reduced
Hypothetical Zeolite Bead Cross-section
Summary: Supports
• Activated Carbon did not reduce 4-NP, but it did absorb it
(400 peak decreased, but 300 did not form)
• Glass wool finished the reduction the fastest for all AuNP
sizes
• Both zeolites performed poorly (texture porosity of bead)
Summary: AuNPs
• C60 and H20 are random in size and shape; H15 and H10 are
more uniform
• The uniform particles prove that higher loading = larger rate
constant (even surface coating & accessibility)
• Random particles had uneven accessibility
• C60 did not work on zeolites because it was stuck in the
“void space” of the bead framework (high loading, low
performance)
•
• GW/H10 was used for recyclability
• Rate became 0 order
• Time increased from 13.3 min to 28.3 min (still lower than all
other variables)
• % gold loading decreased from 1.13% to 0.742% (34% )
•
• Accessibility of the AuNP depends on two factors:
nanoparticle size and characteristic of each support.
• Although smaller sizes = more surface area, the largest
particle in this study proved to be the best catalyst due to
accessibility (surface coating)
• Zeolites have void spaces that trap smaller AuNPs and do not
allow them to come in contact with 4-NP
• Glass wool is fibrous and non-porous so it allows maximum
contact
•
• Dr. Fattah, Thesis Advisor; Dr. Whiting and Dr. Atkinson, Thesis Committee;
Dr. Wei Cao, Thomas Dushatinski, Clay Huff, characterization assistance.
• This material is based upon work supported by the National Science
Foundation under Grant Number (NSF 0841295), GK12 Program.
Supported Gold Nanoparticles as a Heterogeneous
Catalyst for the 4-Nitrophenol Reduction
Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs) are prepared and grafted onto
economically favorable supports (zeolites 13X & 5A, glass wool,
and activated carbon). The catalytic activity is tested with the
reduction of 4-Nitrophenol (4-NP) to 4-Aminophenol (4-AP).
• Bulk gold is chemically inert due to its large particle size and
the highly positive Fermi levels
• Nanoparticles can serve as catalysts in electron transfer
processes such as hydrogenation reactions
1. Four sizes of nanoparticles were synthesized
2. 2mg of AuNP was evaporated onto 500mg of support
3. Gold only, support only, and supported gold were all tested
as catalysts
4. Strongest catalyst was tested for recyclability
5. Characterization with TEM & XRF
Figure 1. UV-Vis curve of the 4-NP reduction by the 4 AuNPs (homogeneous) – times in legend
• Peaks: 400 = 4-NP; 300 = 4-AP
• Within 5 minutes, all 4 colloids reduced the 4-NP
• Homogenous pollutes the system – must be supported
OBJECTIVE RESULTS: Support Only
RESULTS: AuNP Only (Homogenous)
METHODS
RESULTS: Supported AuNP (Heterogeneous)
Reduction of 4-NP via GW/H10
heterogeneous catalyst
Acknowledgements
BACKGROUND
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
250 300 350 400 450 500
Absorbance(a.u.)
Wavelength (nm)
t = 0
AC t = 120
GW t = 120
5A t = 120
13X t = 120
TEM images of all AuNPs
Conclusion
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
250 300 350 400 450 500
Absorbance(a.u.)
Wavelength (nm)
Start (0:00) H15 (1:30)
H20 (1:30) H10 (1:45)
C60 (4:33)
Support
Material
Parameter
No
AuNPs
C60
(7.4nm)
H15
(21.7nm)
H20
(25.5nm)
H10
(53.5nm)
No Support
TIME (min) 4.55 1.50 1.50 1.75
RATE
CONSTANT
1.44x106 2.87x106 4.15x106 3.10x106
% GOLD -- -- -- --
Activated
Carbon
TIME (min) Adsorb Adsorb Adsorb Adsorb Adsorb
RATE
CONSTANT
-- -- -- -- --
% GOLD -- -- -- -- --
Glass Wool
TIME (min) 120.00 28.33 31.67 38.33 13.33
RATE
CONSTANT
10.1 218.4 205.3 125.4 231.2
% GOLD 0.000 0.340 0.500 0.510 1.130
Zeolite 13X
TIME (min) No Rxn Not Comp. 90.00 112.50 57.50
RATE
CONSTANT
-- -- 33.5 33.2 99.4
% GOLD 0.000 2.010 0.490 0.843 0.0250
Zeolite 5A
TIME (min) No Rxn Not Comp. 40.00 91.67 40.00
RATE
CONSTANT
-- -- 133.8 58.6 134.1
% GOLD 0.000 2.500 0.650 1.120 0.820
Table 1. Summary results of all catalysts. Time is displayed in minutes and rate constants (all
1st order) are displayed in min-1x10-3. “Adsorb” indicates the 4-NP was adsorbed and not
reduced, “No Rxn” indicates that there was no change in 4-NP UV-Vis peak at 400nm after 2
hours, and “Not Comp.” indicates that the reaction began to reduce, but was incomplete
after 2 hours.
RESULTS: Supported AuNP (Heterogeneous)
Recyclability
Surface (black edge)
Framework (gray circles – pores are Å scale)
Void Space (blue spaces – larger than pores )

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (8)

Near Infrared Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Ceh 11 3 2010
Near Infrared Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Ceh 11 3 2010Near Infrared Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Ceh 11 3 2010
Near Infrared Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Ceh 11 3 2010
 
gold nanoshells
gold nanoshellsgold nanoshells
gold nanoshells
 
cancer treatment using nanotechnology by RAMYA G
cancer treatment using nanotechnology by RAMYA Gcancer treatment using nanotechnology by RAMYA G
cancer treatment using nanotechnology by RAMYA G
 
Process design.cancer treatment using nanoparticles. ppt
Process design.cancer treatment using nanoparticles. pptProcess design.cancer treatment using nanoparticles. ppt
Process design.cancer treatment using nanoparticles. ppt
 
Raman spectroscopy
Raman spectroscopy Raman spectroscopy
Raman spectroscopy
 
Raman Spectroscopy and Its Applications
Raman Spectroscopy and Its ApplicationsRaman Spectroscopy and Its Applications
Raman Spectroscopy and Its Applications
 
Nanotechnology in treatment of cancer
Nanotechnology in treatment of cancerNanotechnology in treatment of cancer
Nanotechnology in treatment of cancer
 
Raman spectroscopy
Raman spectroscopyRaman spectroscopy
Raman spectroscopy
 

Similar to Paideia2016_Jusino_AuNP-final

DPerry MARM Poster-6.11.16
DPerry MARM Poster-6.11.16DPerry MARM Poster-6.11.16
DPerry MARM Poster-6.11.16
Derek Perry
 
2011 LSAMP Conference - Lejmarc Snowball v12
2011 LSAMP Conference - Lejmarc Snowball v122011 LSAMP Conference - Lejmarc Snowball v12
2011 LSAMP Conference - Lejmarc Snowball v12
Lejmarc Snowball
 
Hu Posterboard Presentation 081011
Hu Posterboard Presentation 081011Hu Posterboard Presentation 081011
Hu Posterboard Presentation 081011
Davis Hu
 
Deposition of Tin Oxide Nanoparticles for Electrochemical Studies of Amyloid ...
Deposition of Tin Oxide Nanoparticles for Electrochemical Studies of Amyloid ...Deposition of Tin Oxide Nanoparticles for Electrochemical Studies of Amyloid ...
Deposition of Tin Oxide Nanoparticles for Electrochemical Studies of Amyloid ...
Kenko95
 
Decontamination of pollutted discharge waters from surface treatment
Decontamination of pollutted discharge waters from surface treatmentDecontamination of pollutted discharge waters from surface treatment
Decontamination of pollutted discharge waters from surface treatment
neehar91
 
Internship oral presentation
Internship oral presentationInternship oral presentation
Internship oral presentation
Anh-Mai
 
Oral presentation
Oral presentationOral presentation
Oral presentation
Anh-Mai
 
Oral presentation
Oral presentationOral presentation
Oral presentation
Anh-Mai
 
Nuffield A1 Celebration Poster Print
Nuffield A1 Celebration Poster PrintNuffield A1 Celebration Poster Print
Nuffield A1 Celebration Poster Print
David Sharp
 

Similar to Paideia2016_Jusino_AuNP-final (20)

DPerry MARM Poster-6.11.16
DPerry MARM Poster-6.11.16DPerry MARM Poster-6.11.16
DPerry MARM Poster-6.11.16
 
2011 LSAMP Conference - Lejmarc Snowball v12
2011 LSAMP Conference - Lejmarc Snowball v122011 LSAMP Conference - Lejmarc Snowball v12
2011 LSAMP Conference - Lejmarc Snowball v12
 
Hu Posterboard Presentation 081011
Hu Posterboard Presentation 081011Hu Posterboard Presentation 081011
Hu Posterboard Presentation 081011
 
Introduction to nanoparticles and bionanomaterials
Introduction to nanoparticles and bionanomaterialsIntroduction to nanoparticles and bionanomaterials
Introduction to nanoparticles and bionanomaterials
 
Deposition of Tin Oxide Nanoparticles for Electrochemical Studies of Amyloid ...
Deposition of Tin Oxide Nanoparticles for Electrochemical Studies of Amyloid ...Deposition of Tin Oxide Nanoparticles for Electrochemical Studies of Amyloid ...
Deposition of Tin Oxide Nanoparticles for Electrochemical Studies of Amyloid ...
 
Synthetic antibacterial agent assisted synthesis of gold nanoparticles chara...
Synthetic antibacterial agent assisted synthesis of gold nanoparticles  chara...Synthetic antibacterial agent assisted synthesis of gold nanoparticles  chara...
Synthetic antibacterial agent assisted synthesis of gold nanoparticles chara...
 
Synthesis and Characterization of Au-Zn Implants in Sapphire
Synthesis and Characterization of Au-Zn Implants in SapphireSynthesis and Characterization of Au-Zn Implants in Sapphire
Synthesis and Characterization of Au-Zn Implants in Sapphire
 
Decontamination of pollutted discharge waters from surface treatment
Decontamination of pollutted discharge waters from surface treatmentDecontamination of pollutted discharge waters from surface treatment
Decontamination of pollutted discharge waters from surface treatment
 
Solubility Studies and Growth of 4-aminobenzophenone Single Crystal: a Potent...
Solubility Studies and Growth of 4-aminobenzophenone Single Crystal: a Potent...Solubility Studies and Growth of 4-aminobenzophenone Single Crystal: a Potent...
Solubility Studies and Growth of 4-aminobenzophenone Single Crystal: a Potent...
 
Ijsea ncrtam1001
Ijsea ncrtam1001Ijsea ncrtam1001
Ijsea ncrtam1001
 
Internship oral presentation
Internship oral presentationInternship oral presentation
Internship oral presentation
 
Oral presentation
Oral presentationOral presentation
Oral presentation
 
New benzotriozole phthalocyanine nickel(ii) photostabilizer for low density p...
New benzotriozole phthalocyanine nickel(ii) photostabilizer for low density p...New benzotriozole phthalocyanine nickel(ii) photostabilizer for low density p...
New benzotriozole phthalocyanine nickel(ii) photostabilizer for low density p...
 
Catalytic Degradation of 4-Nitrophenol Using Gamma Irradiated PVA/Ag Nanocomp...
Catalytic Degradation of 4-Nitrophenol Using Gamma Irradiated PVA/Ag Nanocomp...Catalytic Degradation of 4-Nitrophenol Using Gamma Irradiated PVA/Ag Nanocomp...
Catalytic Degradation of 4-Nitrophenol Using Gamma Irradiated PVA/Ag Nanocomp...
 
Oral presentation
Oral presentationOral presentation
Oral presentation
 
Final Presentation
Final PresentationFinal Presentation
Final Presentation
 
35381
3538135381
35381
 
Twnss 1-jsg-yano
Twnss 1-jsg-yanoTwnss 1-jsg-yano
Twnss 1-jsg-yano
 
Spectroscopic Characterization of Nanoparticles for Potential Drug Discovery
Spectroscopic Characterization of Nanoparticles for Potential Drug DiscoverySpectroscopic Characterization of Nanoparticles for Potential Drug Discovery
Spectroscopic Characterization of Nanoparticles for Potential Drug Discovery
 
Nuffield A1 Celebration Poster Print
Nuffield A1 Celebration Poster PrintNuffield A1 Celebration Poster Print
Nuffield A1 Celebration Poster Print
 

Paideia2016_Jusino_AuNP-final

  • 1. Angelica Jusino, MS ENVS Candidate and Tarek Abdel-Fattah Christopher Newport University, Newport News, VA 23606 Figure 2. UV-Vis spectra of the 4-NP reduction by the 4 supports (no AuNP coating) after 2 hours. After 2 hours • Glass wool reduced after 2 hours • Activated carbon adsorbed – did not reduce (no 300 peak) • Neither zeolite adsorbed or reduced Hypothetical Zeolite Bead Cross-section Summary: Supports • Activated Carbon did not reduce 4-NP, but it did absorb it (400 peak decreased, but 300 did not form) • Glass wool finished the reduction the fastest for all AuNP sizes • Both zeolites performed poorly (texture porosity of bead) Summary: AuNPs • C60 and H20 are random in size and shape; H15 and H10 are more uniform • The uniform particles prove that higher loading = larger rate constant (even surface coating & accessibility) • Random particles had uneven accessibility • C60 did not work on zeolites because it was stuck in the “void space” of the bead framework (high loading, low performance) • • GW/H10 was used for recyclability • Rate became 0 order • Time increased from 13.3 min to 28.3 min (still lower than all other variables) • % gold loading decreased from 1.13% to 0.742% (34% ) • • Accessibility of the AuNP depends on two factors: nanoparticle size and characteristic of each support. • Although smaller sizes = more surface area, the largest particle in this study proved to be the best catalyst due to accessibility (surface coating) • Zeolites have void spaces that trap smaller AuNPs and do not allow them to come in contact with 4-NP • Glass wool is fibrous and non-porous so it allows maximum contact • • Dr. Fattah, Thesis Advisor; Dr. Whiting and Dr. Atkinson, Thesis Committee; Dr. Wei Cao, Thomas Dushatinski, Clay Huff, characterization assistance. • This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number (NSF 0841295), GK12 Program. Supported Gold Nanoparticles as a Heterogeneous Catalyst for the 4-Nitrophenol Reduction Gold Nanoparticles (AuNPs) are prepared and grafted onto economically favorable supports (zeolites 13X & 5A, glass wool, and activated carbon). The catalytic activity is tested with the reduction of 4-Nitrophenol (4-NP) to 4-Aminophenol (4-AP). • Bulk gold is chemically inert due to its large particle size and the highly positive Fermi levels • Nanoparticles can serve as catalysts in electron transfer processes such as hydrogenation reactions 1. Four sizes of nanoparticles were synthesized 2. 2mg of AuNP was evaporated onto 500mg of support 3. Gold only, support only, and supported gold were all tested as catalysts 4. Strongest catalyst was tested for recyclability 5. Characterization with TEM & XRF Figure 1. UV-Vis curve of the 4-NP reduction by the 4 AuNPs (homogeneous) – times in legend • Peaks: 400 = 4-NP; 300 = 4-AP • Within 5 minutes, all 4 colloids reduced the 4-NP • Homogenous pollutes the system – must be supported OBJECTIVE RESULTS: Support Only RESULTS: AuNP Only (Homogenous) METHODS RESULTS: Supported AuNP (Heterogeneous) Reduction of 4-NP via GW/H10 heterogeneous catalyst Acknowledgements BACKGROUND 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 250 300 350 400 450 500 Absorbance(a.u.) Wavelength (nm) t = 0 AC t = 120 GW t = 120 5A t = 120 13X t = 120 TEM images of all AuNPs Conclusion 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 250 300 350 400 450 500 Absorbance(a.u.) Wavelength (nm) Start (0:00) H15 (1:30) H20 (1:30) H10 (1:45) C60 (4:33) Support Material Parameter No AuNPs C60 (7.4nm) H15 (21.7nm) H20 (25.5nm) H10 (53.5nm) No Support TIME (min) 4.55 1.50 1.50 1.75 RATE CONSTANT 1.44x106 2.87x106 4.15x106 3.10x106 % GOLD -- -- -- -- Activated Carbon TIME (min) Adsorb Adsorb Adsorb Adsorb Adsorb RATE CONSTANT -- -- -- -- -- % GOLD -- -- -- -- -- Glass Wool TIME (min) 120.00 28.33 31.67 38.33 13.33 RATE CONSTANT 10.1 218.4 205.3 125.4 231.2 % GOLD 0.000 0.340 0.500 0.510 1.130 Zeolite 13X TIME (min) No Rxn Not Comp. 90.00 112.50 57.50 RATE CONSTANT -- -- 33.5 33.2 99.4 % GOLD 0.000 2.010 0.490 0.843 0.0250 Zeolite 5A TIME (min) No Rxn Not Comp. 40.00 91.67 40.00 RATE CONSTANT -- -- 133.8 58.6 134.1 % GOLD 0.000 2.500 0.650 1.120 0.820 Table 1. Summary results of all catalysts. Time is displayed in minutes and rate constants (all 1st order) are displayed in min-1x10-3. “Adsorb” indicates the 4-NP was adsorbed and not reduced, “No Rxn” indicates that there was no change in 4-NP UV-Vis peak at 400nm after 2 hours, and “Not Comp.” indicates that the reaction began to reduce, but was incomplete after 2 hours. RESULTS: Supported AuNP (Heterogeneous) Recyclability Surface (black edge) Framework (gray circles – pores are Å scale) Void Space (blue spaces – larger than pores )