SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 52
Overpressure Scenarios
         and
 Required Relief Rates
        PART I
Required Data

•   Procure latest PIDs

•   Heat and Mass Balance Report

•   Rotating Equipment Datasheet (performance curves,
    etc.)

•   Vessel and Heat Exchanger Datasheets (drawings)

•   Operating/Emergency procedures

•   Review current project specific document-Relief &
    Blowdown Philosophy
Overpressure Scenario Identification
•    Start with PIDs and PFDs
•    Analyze on equipment-by-equipment basis
•    Typically start at front end of process
•    Identify sources of feed & its maximum pressure
•    Identify all heat input sources including external fire
•    No credit for favorable instrument or operator response
•    Include comments to explain rationale
Industry Guidelines

• API RP 521

• API 2000

• Project Specific Guidelines
API RP 521
1. Fire
2. Closed outlets (Vapor BO or Liquid BO)
3. Failure Opening/closing of Control Valve
4. Thermal Expansion
5. Tube rupture
6. Check Valve Leakage
7. Reflux failure
8. Abnormal heat input
9. Power Failure
10. Utility failure (CW+IA+FG+Steam)
External Fire


Causes:

1.Explosion caused by the ignition of a flammable
leaking gas

2. Leakage of flammable hydrocarbon inventory
Applicability Guidelines

• Equipment must be located with in a fire zone

• Some portion of the equipment must be located below the
  maximum fire height (API RP 521 uses 25 feet)

• In some cases, the time required to reach relief pressure
  may render the scenario not credible
Sizing Equation-
Q=21000*F*A^0.82 (Btu/hr)

Q=34500*F*A^0.82 (Btu/hr)

Wetted Surface Area-

•   Liquid full such as Treaters: 100%

•   Surge Drums, KO drums, Process vessels: NLL

•   Fractionating Columns: NLL + Hold up

•   Working storage (MAWP >15 psig): Max level up to 25 ft

•   Spheres: Up to max horizontal diameter or 25 ft whichever
    is greater

Heat Of Vaporization-Latent heats will be based on the heat
  required to vaporize the first 10% by mass.

               Q = m * Hv@ relief
Shell and Tube Exchangers
• Individual exchangers often not individually protected for
  fire
• Often rely on downstream vessels for protection
• If downstream relief is used, check if loads should be
  additive (e.g., exchanger and vessel are in same fire zone)
• Shell side and tube side may be treated differently (many
  companies neglect tube side due to small surface area)
Air Coolers

• Condensing versus liquid cooling services may be treated
  differently (see API RP 521 Section 3.15.7)

• Many air coolers are located above the maximum fire height

• API has special equations for air coolers

• Exact treatment of fire case for air coolers should be
  defined in the Project Guidelines
Filters, Strainers, etc.

• Equipment less than 24” OD is exempt from ASME VIII (and
  typically fire relief requirement)

• Many companies have additional exclusions for small filters

• Equipment fabricated from pipe may be treated differently
  than ASME stamped equipment

• Often rely on downstream equipment for relief – check
  Project Guidelines on rules to use
Inlet Control Valve Failure:-

Causes-

Instrumentation failure may occur due to

-Transmission signal failure
-Process Measuring element failure

Mechanical failure may occur due to
-Stem breakage
-Plug jamming
-Misoperation

May result in control valve opening or to move in
opposite direction of its design failure position.
Determining Applicability

• Trace all inlet lines to vessel to identify inlet control devices

• Trace upstream from any control devices to determine
  maximum expected upstream pressure

• Upstream pressure will be normal or maximum operating
  pressure

• Can selected upstream pressure exceed downstream
  equipment design pressure?

• Consider relative vessel volumes when the upstream
  volume is much less than the downstream volume
Glycol Contactor                 Glycol Flash Tank

    PSV-1                Dry Gas
    @ 750 psig                                     HC Vapors
                                                   200 psig
                              Lean Glycol

               Vapor                            Vapor
Wet Gas                                                        LC

675 psig                                        Liquid
                         LC
               Liquid
                               LV                                   LV




                       Rich Glycol
Glycol Contactor                 Glycol Flash Tank

    PSV-1                      Dry Gas
    @ 750 psig                                     HC Vapors
                                                   200 psig
                              Lean Glycol

               Vapor                            Vapor
Wet Gas                                                        LC

675 psig                                        Liquid
                                    Fails
                         LC
               Liquid               Open
                               LV                                   LV




                       Rich Glycol
Glycol Contactor                 Glycol Flash Tank

    PSV-1                Dry Gas
    @ 750 psig                                     HC Vapors
                                                   200 psig
                              Lean Glycol

               Vapor                            Vapor
Wet Gas                                                        LC

675 psig                                        Liquid
                                    Fails
                         LC
               Liquid               Open
                               LV                                   LV




                       Rich Glycol
API RP 521 Section 3.10.3



“The scenario to consider is that one inlet valve will be in a
fully opened position regardless of the control valve failure
position…. Therefore, the required relief capacity is the
difference between the maximum expected inlet flow and
the normal outlet flow adjusted for relieving conditions and
considering unit turndown…”
Determining Required Relief Rate

• Use control valve manufacturer’s calculations
• Determine valve flow coefficients
• Consider partially or fully open bypass
• Calculate flow across control valve at downstream relief
  pressure
• Take credit for normal outflow in volumetric terms
Gas Blowby – Special Considerations

Potential for Two Phase Relief in Downstream Vessel

•   Perform relative inventory check to determine how much
    downstream vessel will fill

•   Assume downstream level control remains in normal
    position

Relief behavior depends on liquid level

    -     Below inlet nozzle → all vapor relief

    -     Between inlet nozzle and full, perform disengagement
          calculation → vapor or two phase

    -     Full → liquid displacement equal to volume of
          incoming vapor
Check Downstream Fill Level

             Overfill – Liquid
             Displacement


                           Potential
                           Two Phase
                             Vapor
Inlet from
LC Valve
                            All Vapor
                            Venting

                                        LC
                             Normal
                             Level
                                             LV
Gas Blowby – Special Considerations

Calculating Flow Across Level Control Valve

• Consider assuming two phase flow across valve to reduce
  relief requirement
Heat Exchanger
                      Tube Rupture
Causes:
-   Vibration, corrosion, erosion, thermal shock, differential
    shell side to tube side expansion (fixed tube sheet
    exchanger), brittle fracture potential, tube to baffle chafing,
    degradation of tubes and tube sheets.
High Pressure




   Low Pressure
High Pressure




                          Low Pressure




                Corrosion of Tube
High Pressure




                          Low Pressure




                Corrosion of Tube
                Pinhole Leak
High Pressure




                          Low Pressure




                Corrosion of Tube
                Tube Failure
Low Pressure on Tube Side



Low Pressure




                         High Pressure




               Corrosion of Tube
               Tube Failure
Determining Applicability

1. Determine maximum high-pressure side pressure (Phi)

    -   Design Pressure
    -   relief device set pressure
    -   other mechanical limitation
2. Determine low-pressure side test pressure along with
   associated equipment and piping (Plow)

•   Compare the two pressures
    -   If (Phi) > (Plow) then tube rupture relief is required

    Not generally applied to double pipe exchangers or other
    types of exchangers with schedule pipe for tubes
API 521 Section 3.18.3
The required rate is determined assuming:

•   Single tube has been broken down.

•   The high-pressure side fluid is assumed to flow through the
    broken tube.

•   This is often simplified by conservatively estimating the flow rate
    based on two orifices/one orifice.

•   If there is flash across the broken tube then two phase flow
    needs to consider.

•   Use Crane’s equations based on maximum pressure on high
    pressure side and relief pressure on low side.
Additional Considerations

•   Relief fluid properties are generally not the same as those
    upstream of the tube rupture:

    - Flashing across tube rupture

    - Heating due to contact with hot side fluid

    - Displacement of low-pressure side fluid

•   For high pressure differentials, dynamic analysis is
    sometimes applied
Blocked Outlet (Vapor Or Liquid)

Causes-
Instrumentation System failure may occur
-Transmission signal failure
-Process Measuring element failure

Mechanical failure may occur due to
-Stem breakage
-Plug jamming
-Manual valve mal operation

May result in control valve/block valve to move in
closed position.
Determining Applicability For Blocked Vapor

• Identify potential mechanism resulting in blockage

• Identify sources of overpressure include compressors,
  high-pressure supply headers, and process heat
Flash Drum-Blocked Vapor

        PSV-1                  Dry Gas
        @ 200 psig
                               Fails
                               Close
HC Liquid
250 psig         Vapor

            CV
                          LC
                 Liquid
                               LV
Determining Applicability For Blocked
                    Liquid
• Identify potential mechanism resulting in blockage

• Identify sources of overpressure include pumps, high-
  pressure supply headers.

• Adequate indication and response time may render
  overfilling not credible

  -    Independent high level alarm

  -    20 minutes of retention after alarm prior to overfill

• Often not considered for columns and vessels with no
  normal liquid inflow (suction scrubbers, etc.)
Flash Drum-Blocked Liquid

        PSV-1                  Dry Gas
        @ 200 psig


HC Liquid
250 psig         Vapor

            CV                      Fails
                          LC        Close
                 Liquid
                               LV
Required Relief Rates
•   Centrifugal pumps and compressors
    -   Performance curves define flow at relief
•   PD pumps
    -   Use design flow rate
•   Reciprocating compressors
    -    Use reduced volumetric efficiency
•   High pressure supply headers
    -   Normal inlet flow
Thermal Expansion
Causes:

“Hydraulic expansion … can result from several causes, the most
common of which are the following:

a. An exchanger is blocked-in on the cold side with flow in the
hot side.

b. Piping or vessels are blocked-in while they are filled with cold
liquid and are subsequently heated by heat tracing, coils, ambient
heat gain, solar radiation or fire.
Heat Exchanger Thermal Expansion


  o
90 F
                      o
       Cold Side   120 F




                      Hot Side




                                o       o
                             220 F   110 F
Cold Side Inadvertently
            Blocked Prior to Hot Side

  o
90 F
                       o
       Cold Side    120 F




                       Hot Side




                                 o         o
                              220 F     110 F
Cold Side Temperature Increases


                          o
                       170 F
           Cold Side




                          Hot Side




q=(Cubic Expansion
                                    o
Coeff.*Q)/                       220 F

(1000*sp.gravity*specific
heat capacity)
Is a relief device required?

• Guidelines on piping from, “Decide Whether to Use Thermal
  Relief Valves,” CEP 12/93; Bravo and Beatty

  -    Yes, for lines more than 80 feet long

  -    No, for lines with an ID less than 1.5”

  -    No, for lines with high operating temperatures

• API RP 521 on exchangers

  -    Locking open a block valve and posting signs may be
       adequate protection
Check Valve Leakage

Causes-

-Stuck Open
-Broken flapper
-Check valve seat leakage

May result in overpressure due to leakage through check valve
if the maximum normal operating pressure of the high-
pressure system is greater than the design pressure of vessels
present upstream of the check valve.
Check Valve Leakage

- Leakage rate can be assumed equal to the 10% of the
maximum normal forward flow (vapor or liquid).

-The reverse flow rate through a single check valve can be
determined using the normal flow characteristics (i.e.,
forward-flow Cv) of the check valve. Leakage rate can be
assumed to be 10 % forward flow Cv.
Overhead Condenser
      Failure, Reflux Failure, Abnormal Heat Input
                    Or Power Failure
Causes-

Utility Failure, Mechanical failure of rotary equipments, Shutting down
of utility compressor, Failure opening of control valve, Pumps or fail
closure of control valve on supply line may result in complete loss of a
utility or the partial loss of a utility, Instrumentation failure or loss of
transformer/MCC/Busbar
Condenser
                                     PC
Overhead (V)

                 Reflux (R)
                                   Accumulator
                                          LC
Feed (F)



                              Reboiler
Column
               Heat in (Q)         LC
                                          Bottoms (B)
Loss of Coolant
                      Condenser     to Condenser

                                     PC
Overhead (V)

                 Reflux (R)
                                   Accumulator
                                          LC
Feed (F)



                              Reboiler
Column
               Heat in (Q)         LC
                                          Bottoms (B)
Loss of
Reflux                Condenser
                                     PC
Overhead (V)

                 Reflux (R)
                                   Accumulator
                                          LC
Feed (F)

                                                 Process

                              Reboiler
 Column
                                   LC           Steam
               Heat in (Q)
                                          Bottoms (B)
Determining Applicability

• In general, loss of cooling (from condenser or pump-around
  exchanger) will result in overpressure for distillation
  systems

• Loss of reflux can also result in flooding of condenser
In Conclusion…

•   Collect information required to perform analysis

•   Review relevant guidelines

•   Determine all overpressure scenarios that apply to each
    piece of equipment

•   Analyze required relief rates using standard methods

•   Be conservative at first
Thank You

More Related Content

What's hot

PSV Sizing - API Based
PSV Sizing - API BasedPSV Sizing - API Based
PSV Sizing - API BasedVijay Sarathy
 
Ai Ch E Overpressure Protection Training
Ai Ch E Overpressure Protection TrainingAi Ch E Overpressure Protection Training
Ai Ch E Overpressure Protection Trainingernestvictor
 
Accumulation and Over-pressure: difference between accumulation and overpressure
Accumulation and Over-pressure: difference between accumulation and overpressureAccumulation and Over-pressure: difference between accumulation and overpressure
Accumulation and Over-pressure: difference between accumulation and overpressureVarun Patel
 
Pressure Relief Valve Sizing for Single Phase Flow
Pressure Relief Valve Sizing for Single Phase FlowPressure Relief Valve Sizing for Single Phase Flow
Pressure Relief Valve Sizing for Single Phase FlowVikram Sharma
 
Sizing of relief valves for supercritical fluids
Sizing of relief valves for supercritical fluidsSizing of relief valves for supercritical fluids
Sizing of relief valves for supercritical fluidsAlexis Torreele
 
Pressure safety valves
Pressure safety valvesPressure safety valves
Pressure safety valvesAmol Dudhate
 
Pressure Safety Valve Sizing - API 520/521/526
Pressure Safety Valve Sizing - API 520/521/526Pressure Safety Valve Sizing - API 520/521/526
Pressure Safety Valve Sizing - API 520/521/526Vijay Sarathy
 
Relief and safety valves for thermal power plants
Relief and safety valves for thermal power plantsRelief and safety valves for thermal power plants
Relief and safety valves for thermal power plantsSHIVAJI CHOUDHURY
 
Pressure Vacuum Relief Valve.pptx
Pressure Vacuum Relief Valve.pptxPressure Vacuum Relief Valve.pptx
Pressure Vacuum Relief Valve.pptxSwamiVidya
 
Centrifugal Compressor System Design & Simulation
Centrifugal Compressor System Design & SimulationCentrifugal Compressor System Design & Simulation
Centrifugal Compressor System Design & SimulationVijay Sarathy
 
Safety valve in process industry1
Safety valve in process industry1Safety valve in process industry1
Safety valve in process industry1Nitesh Chauhan
 
CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR SETTLE OUT CONDITIONS TUTORIAL
CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR SETTLE OUT CONDITIONS TUTORIALCENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR SETTLE OUT CONDITIONS TUTORIAL
CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR SETTLE OUT CONDITIONS TUTORIALVijay Sarathy
 
Eng handbook crosby pressure relief valve engineering handbook
Eng handbook crosby pressure relief valve engineering handbookEng handbook crosby pressure relief valve engineering handbook
Eng handbook crosby pressure relief valve engineering handbookAli Meshaikhis
 
Design Calculations of Venting in Atmospheric and Low-pressure Storage Tanks ...
Design Calculations of Venting in Atmospheric and Low-pressure Storage Tanks ...Design Calculations of Venting in Atmospheric and Low-pressure Storage Tanks ...
Design Calculations of Venting in Atmospheric and Low-pressure Storage Tanks ...Pradeep Dhondi
 
Gas Compression Stages – Process Design & Optimization
Gas Compression Stages – Process Design & OptimizationGas Compression Stages – Process Design & Optimization
Gas Compression Stages – Process Design & OptimizationVijay Sarathy
 

What's hot (20)

Pipe line sizing
Pipe line sizingPipe line sizing
Pipe line sizing
 
PSV Sizing - API Based
PSV Sizing - API BasedPSV Sizing - API Based
PSV Sizing - API Based
 
Ai Ch E Overpressure Protection Training
Ai Ch E Overpressure Protection TrainingAi Ch E Overpressure Protection Training
Ai Ch E Overpressure Protection Training
 
Accumulation and Over-pressure: difference between accumulation and overpressure
Accumulation and Over-pressure: difference between accumulation and overpressureAccumulation and Over-pressure: difference between accumulation and overpressure
Accumulation and Over-pressure: difference between accumulation and overpressure
 
Pressure Relief Valve Sizing for Single Phase Flow
Pressure Relief Valve Sizing for Single Phase FlowPressure Relief Valve Sizing for Single Phase Flow
Pressure Relief Valve Sizing for Single Phase Flow
 
Sizing of relief valves for supercritical fluids
Sizing of relief valves for supercritical fluidsSizing of relief valves for supercritical fluids
Sizing of relief valves for supercritical fluids
 
Pressure safety valves
Pressure safety valvesPressure safety valves
Pressure safety valves
 
PSV Sizing.pdf
PSV Sizing.pdfPSV Sizing.pdf
PSV Sizing.pdf
 
Pressure Safety Valve Sizing - API 520/521/526
Pressure Safety Valve Sizing - API 520/521/526Pressure Safety Valve Sizing - API 520/521/526
Pressure Safety Valve Sizing - API 520/521/526
 
psv specifications
psv specificationspsv specifications
psv specifications
 
Line sizing
Line sizingLine sizing
Line sizing
 
Flarenet
FlarenetFlarenet
Flarenet
 
Relief and safety valves for thermal power plants
Relief and safety valves for thermal power plantsRelief and safety valves for thermal power plants
Relief and safety valves for thermal power plants
 
Pressure Vacuum Relief Valve.pptx
Pressure Vacuum Relief Valve.pptxPressure Vacuum Relief Valve.pptx
Pressure Vacuum Relief Valve.pptx
 
Centrifugal Compressor System Design & Simulation
Centrifugal Compressor System Design & SimulationCentrifugal Compressor System Design & Simulation
Centrifugal Compressor System Design & Simulation
 
Safety valve in process industry1
Safety valve in process industry1Safety valve in process industry1
Safety valve in process industry1
 
CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR SETTLE OUT CONDITIONS TUTORIAL
CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR SETTLE OUT CONDITIONS TUTORIALCENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR SETTLE OUT CONDITIONS TUTORIAL
CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSOR SETTLE OUT CONDITIONS TUTORIAL
 
Eng handbook crosby pressure relief valve engineering handbook
Eng handbook crosby pressure relief valve engineering handbookEng handbook crosby pressure relief valve engineering handbook
Eng handbook crosby pressure relief valve engineering handbook
 
Design Calculations of Venting in Atmospheric and Low-pressure Storage Tanks ...
Design Calculations of Venting in Atmospheric and Low-pressure Storage Tanks ...Design Calculations of Venting in Atmospheric and Low-pressure Storage Tanks ...
Design Calculations of Venting in Atmospheric and Low-pressure Storage Tanks ...
 
Gas Compression Stages – Process Design & Optimization
Gas Compression Stages – Process Design & OptimizationGas Compression Stages – Process Design & Optimization
Gas Compression Stages – Process Design & Optimization
 

Viewers also liked

Troubleshooting process operations
Troubleshooting process operationsTroubleshooting process operations
Troubleshooting process operationsSrihari Kodimela
 
Case Study: Column Relief Study
Case Study: Column Relief StudyCase Study: Column Relief Study
Case Study: Column Relief StudyFlex Process
 
Hazard identification and risk assessment
Hazard identification and risk assessmentHazard identification and risk assessment
Hazard identification and risk assessmentSeshadhiri Palraj
 
Case Study: Refinery Relief and Flare Study
Case Study: Refinery Relief and Flare StudyCase Study: Refinery Relief and Flare Study
Case Study: Refinery Relief and Flare StudyFlex Process
 
Flare reduction projects - issues underlying limited uptake - Steve Ross (SGS)
Flare reduction projects - issues underlying limited uptake - Steve Ross (SGS)Flare reduction projects - issues underlying limited uptake - Steve Ross (SGS)
Flare reduction projects - issues underlying limited uptake - Steve Ross (SGS)Esther Petrilli-Massey
 
The Gas Recovery System Presentation
The Gas Recovery System PresentationThe Gas Recovery System Presentation
The Gas Recovery System PresentationGulfCoastConsulting
 
Gc& E Presentation Rev2 A
Gc& E Presentation Rev2 AGc& E Presentation Rev2 A
Gc& E Presentation Rev2 Aernestvictor
 
Testing of Safety Valves
Testing of Safety ValvesTesting of Safety Valves
Testing of Safety ValvesCarl Stevens
 

Viewers also liked (12)

Troubleshooting process operations
Troubleshooting process operationsTroubleshooting process operations
Troubleshooting process operations
 
Case Study: Column Relief Study
Case Study: Column Relief StudyCase Study: Column Relief Study
Case Study: Column Relief Study
 
Hazard identification and risk assessment
Hazard identification and risk assessmentHazard identification and risk assessment
Hazard identification and risk assessment
 
Revosteam- Coil Type Boiler
Revosteam- Coil Type BoilerRevosteam- Coil Type Boiler
Revosteam- Coil Type Boiler
 
MET 214 Module 6
MET 214 Module 6MET 214 Module 6
MET 214 Module 6
 
Case Study: Refinery Relief and Flare Study
Case Study: Refinery Relief and Flare StudyCase Study: Refinery Relief and Flare Study
Case Study: Refinery Relief and Flare Study
 
Flare reduction projects - issues underlying limited uptake - Steve Ross (SGS)
Flare reduction projects - issues underlying limited uptake - Steve Ross (SGS)Flare reduction projects - issues underlying limited uptake - Steve Ross (SGS)
Flare reduction projects - issues underlying limited uptake - Steve Ross (SGS)
 
The Gas Recovery System Presentation
The Gas Recovery System PresentationThe Gas Recovery System Presentation
The Gas Recovery System Presentation
 
Gc& E Presentation Rev2 A
Gc& E Presentation Rev2 AGc& E Presentation Rev2 A
Gc& E Presentation Rev2 A
 
Flaring practices in petroleum industry
Flaring practices in petroleum industryFlaring practices in petroleum industry
Flaring practices in petroleum industry
 
Flare Case Study - Savvy
Flare Case Study - SavvyFlare Case Study - Savvy
Flare Case Study - Savvy
 
Testing of Safety Valves
Testing of Safety ValvesTesting of Safety Valves
Testing of Safety Valves
 

Similar to Overpressure scenarios overview final

Basic Fluid Dynamics - Control Valves
Basic Fluid Dynamics - Control Valves  Basic Fluid Dynamics - Control Valves
Basic Fluid Dynamics - Control Valves Brannon Gant
 
Control valves for thermal power plants
Control valves for thermal power plantsControl valves for thermal power plants
Control valves for thermal power plantsSHIVAJI CHOUDHURY
 
Instrument questions
Instrument questionsInstrument questions
Instrument questions1job1
 
Explora power point d
Explora power point dExplora power point d
Explora power point dcrector12
 
Module 12 Two Phase Fluid Flow And Heat Transfer 2010 June Nrc
Module 12   Two Phase Fluid Flow And Heat Transfer 2010 June NrcModule 12   Two Phase Fluid Flow And Heat Transfer 2010 June Nrc
Module 12 Two Phase Fluid Flow And Heat Transfer 2010 June NrcJoe Miller
 
Week 1 3_pascal_bernoulli
Week 1 3_pascal_bernoulliWeek 1 3_pascal_bernoulli
Week 1 3_pascal_bernoulliakmal ariffin
 
Non mechanical valves
Non mechanical valvesNon mechanical valves
Non mechanical valvesRaju Gupta
 
Control valve presentation
Control valve presentationControl valve presentation
Control valve presentationPrem kumar
 
Psv fire training weldfit
Psv fire training weldfitPsv fire training weldfit
Psv fire training weldfitAdam Murray
 
Industrial Istrumentation
Industrial IstrumentationIndustrial Istrumentation
Industrial Istrumentationzmagical
 
FUNDAMENTAL OF VALVE DESIGN
FUNDAMENTAL OF VALVE DESIGN FUNDAMENTAL OF VALVE DESIGN
FUNDAMENTAL OF VALVE DESIGN MOHAMMAD ATIF ALI
 
Steam blowing stages before turbine rolling
Steam blowing stages before turbine rollingSteam blowing stages before turbine rolling
Steam blowing stages before turbine rollingabhinav kumar
 
PSV Calculation and Philosophy.pdf
PSV Calculation and Philosophy.pdfPSV Calculation and Philosophy.pdf
PSV Calculation and Philosophy.pdfmitesh979351
 
CONTROL VALVE questions.pdf
CONTROL VALVE questions.pdfCONTROL VALVE questions.pdf
CONTROL VALVE questions.pdfAmiTG34
 

Similar to Overpressure scenarios overview final (20)

steam_blowing.pdf
steam_blowing.pdfsteam_blowing.pdf
steam_blowing.pdf
 
Basic Fluid Dynamics - Control Valves
Basic Fluid Dynamics - Control Valves  Basic Fluid Dynamics - Control Valves
Basic Fluid Dynamics - Control Valves
 
Control valves for thermal power plants
Control valves for thermal power plantsControl valves for thermal power plants
Control valves for thermal power plants
 
Instrument questions
Instrument questionsInstrument questions
Instrument questions
 
Explora power point d
Explora power point dExplora power point d
Explora power point d
 
Module 12 Two Phase Fluid Flow And Heat Transfer 2010 June Nrc
Module 12   Two Phase Fluid Flow And Heat Transfer 2010 June NrcModule 12   Two Phase Fluid Flow And Heat Transfer 2010 June Nrc
Module 12 Two Phase Fluid Flow And Heat Transfer 2010 June Nrc
 
Condensate system
Condensate systemCondensate system
Condensate system
 
Week 1 3_pascal_bernoulli
Week 1 3_pascal_bernoulliWeek 1 3_pascal_bernoulli
Week 1 3_pascal_bernoulli
 
VAPORIZER.pptx
VAPORIZER.pptxVAPORIZER.pptx
VAPORIZER.pptx
 
Non mechanical valves
Non mechanical valvesNon mechanical valves
Non mechanical valves
 
General Control Valve Study
General Control Valve StudyGeneral Control Valve Study
General Control Valve Study
 
PUMPS.ppt
PUMPS.pptPUMPS.ppt
PUMPS.ppt
 
Control valve presentation
Control valve presentationControl valve presentation
Control valve presentation
 
Psv fire training weldfit
Psv fire training weldfitPsv fire training weldfit
Psv fire training weldfit
 
Industrial Istrumentation
Industrial IstrumentationIndustrial Istrumentation
Industrial Istrumentation
 
FUNDAMENTAL OF VALVE DESIGN
FUNDAMENTAL OF VALVE DESIGN FUNDAMENTAL OF VALVE DESIGN
FUNDAMENTAL OF VALVE DESIGN
 
Steam blowing stages before turbine rolling
Steam blowing stages before turbine rollingSteam blowing stages before turbine rolling
Steam blowing stages before turbine rolling
 
PSV Calculation and Philosophy.pdf
PSV Calculation and Philosophy.pdfPSV Calculation and Philosophy.pdf
PSV Calculation and Philosophy.pdf
 
CONTROL VALVE questions.pdf
CONTROL VALVE questions.pdfCONTROL VALVE questions.pdf
CONTROL VALVE questions.pdf
 
cdu and vdu unit
cdu and vdu unitcdu and vdu unit
cdu and vdu unit
 

Overpressure scenarios overview final

  • 1. Overpressure Scenarios and Required Relief Rates PART I
  • 2. Required Data • Procure latest PIDs • Heat and Mass Balance Report • Rotating Equipment Datasheet (performance curves, etc.) • Vessel and Heat Exchanger Datasheets (drawings) • Operating/Emergency procedures • Review current project specific document-Relief & Blowdown Philosophy
  • 3. Overpressure Scenario Identification • Start with PIDs and PFDs • Analyze on equipment-by-equipment basis • Typically start at front end of process • Identify sources of feed & its maximum pressure • Identify all heat input sources including external fire • No credit for favorable instrument or operator response • Include comments to explain rationale
  • 4. Industry Guidelines • API RP 521 • API 2000 • Project Specific Guidelines
  • 5. API RP 521 1. Fire 2. Closed outlets (Vapor BO or Liquid BO) 3. Failure Opening/closing of Control Valve 4. Thermal Expansion 5. Tube rupture 6. Check Valve Leakage 7. Reflux failure 8. Abnormal heat input 9. Power Failure 10. Utility failure (CW+IA+FG+Steam)
  • 6. External Fire Causes: 1.Explosion caused by the ignition of a flammable leaking gas 2. Leakage of flammable hydrocarbon inventory
  • 7. Applicability Guidelines • Equipment must be located with in a fire zone • Some portion of the equipment must be located below the maximum fire height (API RP 521 uses 25 feet) • In some cases, the time required to reach relief pressure may render the scenario not credible
  • 8. Sizing Equation- Q=21000*F*A^0.82 (Btu/hr) Q=34500*F*A^0.82 (Btu/hr) Wetted Surface Area- • Liquid full such as Treaters: 100% • Surge Drums, KO drums, Process vessels: NLL • Fractionating Columns: NLL + Hold up • Working storage (MAWP >15 psig): Max level up to 25 ft • Spheres: Up to max horizontal diameter or 25 ft whichever is greater Heat Of Vaporization-Latent heats will be based on the heat required to vaporize the first 10% by mass. Q = m * Hv@ relief
  • 9. Shell and Tube Exchangers • Individual exchangers often not individually protected for fire • Often rely on downstream vessels for protection • If downstream relief is used, check if loads should be additive (e.g., exchanger and vessel are in same fire zone) • Shell side and tube side may be treated differently (many companies neglect tube side due to small surface area)
  • 10. Air Coolers • Condensing versus liquid cooling services may be treated differently (see API RP 521 Section 3.15.7) • Many air coolers are located above the maximum fire height • API has special equations for air coolers • Exact treatment of fire case for air coolers should be defined in the Project Guidelines
  • 11. Filters, Strainers, etc. • Equipment less than 24” OD is exempt from ASME VIII (and typically fire relief requirement) • Many companies have additional exclusions for small filters • Equipment fabricated from pipe may be treated differently than ASME stamped equipment • Often rely on downstream equipment for relief – check Project Guidelines on rules to use
  • 12. Inlet Control Valve Failure:- Causes- Instrumentation failure may occur due to -Transmission signal failure -Process Measuring element failure Mechanical failure may occur due to -Stem breakage -Plug jamming -Misoperation May result in control valve opening or to move in opposite direction of its design failure position.
  • 13. Determining Applicability • Trace all inlet lines to vessel to identify inlet control devices • Trace upstream from any control devices to determine maximum expected upstream pressure • Upstream pressure will be normal or maximum operating pressure • Can selected upstream pressure exceed downstream equipment design pressure? • Consider relative vessel volumes when the upstream volume is much less than the downstream volume
  • 14. Glycol Contactor Glycol Flash Tank PSV-1 Dry Gas @ 750 psig HC Vapors 200 psig Lean Glycol Vapor Vapor Wet Gas LC 675 psig Liquid LC Liquid LV LV Rich Glycol
  • 15. Glycol Contactor Glycol Flash Tank PSV-1 Dry Gas @ 750 psig HC Vapors 200 psig Lean Glycol Vapor Vapor Wet Gas LC 675 psig Liquid Fails LC Liquid Open LV LV Rich Glycol
  • 16. Glycol Contactor Glycol Flash Tank PSV-1 Dry Gas @ 750 psig HC Vapors 200 psig Lean Glycol Vapor Vapor Wet Gas LC 675 psig Liquid Fails LC Liquid Open LV LV Rich Glycol
  • 17. API RP 521 Section 3.10.3 “The scenario to consider is that one inlet valve will be in a fully opened position regardless of the control valve failure position…. Therefore, the required relief capacity is the difference between the maximum expected inlet flow and the normal outlet flow adjusted for relieving conditions and considering unit turndown…”
  • 18. Determining Required Relief Rate • Use control valve manufacturer’s calculations • Determine valve flow coefficients • Consider partially or fully open bypass • Calculate flow across control valve at downstream relief pressure • Take credit for normal outflow in volumetric terms
  • 19. Gas Blowby – Special Considerations Potential for Two Phase Relief in Downstream Vessel • Perform relative inventory check to determine how much downstream vessel will fill • Assume downstream level control remains in normal position Relief behavior depends on liquid level - Below inlet nozzle → all vapor relief - Between inlet nozzle and full, perform disengagement calculation → vapor or two phase - Full → liquid displacement equal to volume of incoming vapor
  • 20. Check Downstream Fill Level Overfill – Liquid Displacement Potential Two Phase Vapor Inlet from LC Valve All Vapor Venting LC Normal Level LV
  • 21. Gas Blowby – Special Considerations Calculating Flow Across Level Control Valve • Consider assuming two phase flow across valve to reduce relief requirement
  • 22. Heat Exchanger Tube Rupture Causes: - Vibration, corrosion, erosion, thermal shock, differential shell side to tube side expansion (fixed tube sheet exchanger), brittle fracture potential, tube to baffle chafing, degradation of tubes and tube sheets.
  • 23.
  • 24. High Pressure Low Pressure
  • 25. High Pressure Low Pressure Corrosion of Tube
  • 26. High Pressure Low Pressure Corrosion of Tube Pinhole Leak
  • 27. High Pressure Low Pressure Corrosion of Tube Tube Failure
  • 28. Low Pressure on Tube Side Low Pressure High Pressure Corrosion of Tube Tube Failure
  • 29. Determining Applicability 1. Determine maximum high-pressure side pressure (Phi) - Design Pressure - relief device set pressure - other mechanical limitation 2. Determine low-pressure side test pressure along with associated equipment and piping (Plow) • Compare the two pressures - If (Phi) > (Plow) then tube rupture relief is required Not generally applied to double pipe exchangers or other types of exchangers with schedule pipe for tubes
  • 30. API 521 Section 3.18.3 The required rate is determined assuming: • Single tube has been broken down. • The high-pressure side fluid is assumed to flow through the broken tube. • This is often simplified by conservatively estimating the flow rate based on two orifices/one orifice. • If there is flash across the broken tube then two phase flow needs to consider. • Use Crane’s equations based on maximum pressure on high pressure side and relief pressure on low side.
  • 31. Additional Considerations • Relief fluid properties are generally not the same as those upstream of the tube rupture: - Flashing across tube rupture - Heating due to contact with hot side fluid - Displacement of low-pressure side fluid • For high pressure differentials, dynamic analysis is sometimes applied
  • 32. Blocked Outlet (Vapor Or Liquid) Causes- Instrumentation System failure may occur -Transmission signal failure -Process Measuring element failure Mechanical failure may occur due to -Stem breakage -Plug jamming -Manual valve mal operation May result in control valve/block valve to move in closed position.
  • 33. Determining Applicability For Blocked Vapor • Identify potential mechanism resulting in blockage • Identify sources of overpressure include compressors, high-pressure supply headers, and process heat
  • 34. Flash Drum-Blocked Vapor PSV-1 Dry Gas @ 200 psig Fails Close HC Liquid 250 psig Vapor CV LC Liquid LV
  • 35. Determining Applicability For Blocked Liquid • Identify potential mechanism resulting in blockage • Identify sources of overpressure include pumps, high- pressure supply headers. • Adequate indication and response time may render overfilling not credible - Independent high level alarm - 20 minutes of retention after alarm prior to overfill • Often not considered for columns and vessels with no normal liquid inflow (suction scrubbers, etc.)
  • 36. Flash Drum-Blocked Liquid PSV-1 Dry Gas @ 200 psig HC Liquid 250 psig Vapor CV Fails LC Close Liquid LV
  • 37. Required Relief Rates • Centrifugal pumps and compressors - Performance curves define flow at relief • PD pumps - Use design flow rate • Reciprocating compressors - Use reduced volumetric efficiency • High pressure supply headers - Normal inlet flow
  • 39. Causes: “Hydraulic expansion … can result from several causes, the most common of which are the following: a. An exchanger is blocked-in on the cold side with flow in the hot side. b. Piping or vessels are blocked-in while they are filled with cold liquid and are subsequently heated by heat tracing, coils, ambient heat gain, solar radiation or fire.
  • 40. Heat Exchanger Thermal Expansion o 90 F o Cold Side 120 F Hot Side o o 220 F 110 F
  • 41. Cold Side Inadvertently Blocked Prior to Hot Side o 90 F o Cold Side 120 F Hot Side o o 220 F 110 F
  • 42. Cold Side Temperature Increases o 170 F Cold Side Hot Side q=(Cubic Expansion o Coeff.*Q)/ 220 F (1000*sp.gravity*specific heat capacity)
  • 43. Is a relief device required? • Guidelines on piping from, “Decide Whether to Use Thermal Relief Valves,” CEP 12/93; Bravo and Beatty - Yes, for lines more than 80 feet long - No, for lines with an ID less than 1.5” - No, for lines with high operating temperatures • API RP 521 on exchangers - Locking open a block valve and posting signs may be adequate protection
  • 44. Check Valve Leakage Causes- -Stuck Open -Broken flapper -Check valve seat leakage May result in overpressure due to leakage through check valve if the maximum normal operating pressure of the high- pressure system is greater than the design pressure of vessels present upstream of the check valve.
  • 45. Check Valve Leakage - Leakage rate can be assumed equal to the 10% of the maximum normal forward flow (vapor or liquid). -The reverse flow rate through a single check valve can be determined using the normal flow characteristics (i.e., forward-flow Cv) of the check valve. Leakage rate can be assumed to be 10 % forward flow Cv.
  • 46. Overhead Condenser Failure, Reflux Failure, Abnormal Heat Input Or Power Failure Causes- Utility Failure, Mechanical failure of rotary equipments, Shutting down of utility compressor, Failure opening of control valve, Pumps or fail closure of control valve on supply line may result in complete loss of a utility or the partial loss of a utility, Instrumentation failure or loss of transformer/MCC/Busbar
  • 47. Condenser PC Overhead (V) Reflux (R) Accumulator LC Feed (F) Reboiler Column Heat in (Q) LC Bottoms (B)
  • 48. Loss of Coolant Condenser to Condenser PC Overhead (V) Reflux (R) Accumulator LC Feed (F) Reboiler Column Heat in (Q) LC Bottoms (B)
  • 49. Loss of Reflux Condenser PC Overhead (V) Reflux (R) Accumulator LC Feed (F) Process Reboiler Column LC Steam Heat in (Q) Bottoms (B)
  • 50. Determining Applicability • In general, loss of cooling (from condenser or pump-around exchanger) will result in overpressure for distillation systems • Loss of reflux can also result in flooding of condenser
  • 51. In Conclusion… • Collect information required to perform analysis • Review relevant guidelines • Determine all overpressure scenarios that apply to each piece of equipment • Analyze required relief rates using standard methods • Be conservative at first

Editor's Notes

  1. 1 1 Overpressure is the result of an unbalance or disruption of the normal flows of material and energy that causes the material or energy, or both, to build up in some part of the system. Analysis of the causes and magnitudes of overpressure is, therefore, a special and complex study of material and energy balances in a process system.
  2. 15 17
  3. 3
  4. 5 6
  5. 15 17 pool fires which generally result in lower intensity fires than those expected for jet fire scenarios. PSVs are only sized for pool fires, not for jet fires. Other protection layers can include fire detection, active (e.g. spray nozzle systems, manual intervention, water monitors that can be used to direct water on the area of jet fire impingement) and passive fire protection (e.g. firewalls, fireproof insulation), emergency depressurization, plant layout, drainage, location and orientation of flanges etc. 
  6. Wetted surface area is effective. Only portion of the vessel that is wetted by internal liquid and is equal to or less than 25 ft above source of flame. Variations per client. Most use HLL instead of NLL. Relieving temp is often greater than the MAWT. Unwetted wall vessels such as vapor portion, gases, supercritical: Low heat flow, enough heat to vessel rupture first. An unwetted steel plate 1” thick would take about ~ 12 mins to reach 1100 F and 17 mins to 1300 F. Addressed per guidelines.
  7. 13 16
  8. 13 16
  9. 13 16
  10. 30 40
  11. 31 41
  12. 31 41
  13. 31 41
  14. 37 46
  15. 37 46
  16. 41 50
  17. 37 46
  18. 46 tube failure due to expansion and buckling of the tubes the tubes are subject to failure from a number of causes, such as thermal shock, vibration, corrosion, erosion or (in fixed tubesheet exchanger designs) differential shellside to tubeside expansion.
  19. 15 17
  20. 51
  21. 1. An Internal failure can vary from a pinhole leak to a complete tube rupture.
  22. 15 17
  23. 31 41
  24. 15 17
  25. 31 41
  26. 67
  27. 78
  28. 79 61
  29. 80
  30. 81
  31. 82
  32. 15 17