The document compares the existing online orientation to Cynosure's orientation, noting that the existing orientation works across devices, has closed captions, and a completion rate of around 80% over two years, while Cynosure's orientation has issues on some devices, lacks closed captions, has questionable ADA compliance, and reliability problems. It suggests developing a new orientation in-house using HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript and XML for full ADA compliance across all devices that would also save money to fund other projects.

1. ONLINE ORIENTATION
Comparison

2. EXISTING ONLINE ORIENTATION
COMPLETION RATE – FY 2013/14

3. EXISTING ONLINE ORIENTATION
COMPLETION RATE – FY 2014/15

4. EXISTING ORIENTATION
 Works on iOS devices
 Works on Android devices
 Has closed-captions
 High completion rate over 2 years (approx. 80% completion)
 Integrated with our system
 Is ADA-compliant

5. CYNOSURE’S ORIENTATION
 Does not work on iOS devices without a workaround
 Has problems on Android devices
 Does not have closed-captions (has Flash workaround audio)
 Completion rates?
 Is it ADA-compliant? Questionable. W3C Validator says it’s not.
 Reliability Issues (all demos were down 9/4/15 – Last Friday)

6. SUGGESTED PATH FOR NEW
ORIENTATION
 HTM5/CSS3/JS/XML – fully ADA compliant without workarounds
 Responsive – works on all devices natively
 Developed In-House – so we have full control over updates, etc.
 Saves $$, so we can use SSSP funds for bigger, better things

7. DEMO