The document presents a new usage-based approach to analyzing grammatical constructions called the Pattern Lattice Model (PLM). It summarizes a quantitative research study analyzing the resultative construction using a database of over 6000 examples. Key findings include the inconsistent positioning of slots within patterns and the highly lexical nature of productive patterns. The study concludes that the resultative construction can be viewed as a mosaic of conventional patterns rather than being reducible to lexical or abstract factors alone. Remaining problems with the approach are noted, such as the abstract nature of the pattern generation versus analyzing real language examples.
This document discusses the concept of "windowing of attention" in language. Windowing refers to focusing attention on a portion of a situation by mentioning it explicitly, while placing the rest in the background by omitting mention. The document provides examples of different types of event frames that can be windowed, including paths, causal chains, cycles, participant interactions, and interrelationships. It also discusses how multiple and nested windowing can occur simultaneously.
The document presents a new usage-based approach to analyzing grammatical constructions called the Pattern Lattice Model (PLM). It summarizes a quantitative research study analyzing the resultative construction using a database of over 6000 examples. Key findings include the inconsistent positioning of slots within patterns and the highly lexical nature of productive patterns. The study concludes that the resultative construction can be viewed as a mosaic of conventional patterns rather than being reducible to lexical or abstract factors alone. Remaining problems with the approach are noted, such as the abstract nature of the pattern generation versus analyzing real language examples.
This document discusses the concept of "windowing of attention" in language. Windowing refers to focusing attention on a portion of a situation by mentioning it explicitly, while placing the rest in the background by omitting mention. The document provides examples of different types of event frames that can be windowed, including paths, causal chains, cycles, participant interactions, and interrelationships. It also discusses how multiple and nested windowing can occur simultaneously.
ç«æ倧åŠESSæ§ããã¹ããŒãã®åç¹ãã»ãããŒWhy You + Why This Topic= Originality^2 2012幎3æ16æ¥ãç«æ倧åŠæ± è¢ãã£ã³ãã¹ è¬åž«ïŒå®®åŽãç§å€ª
ç«æ倧åŠESSæ§ããã¹ããŒãã®åç¹ãã»ãããŒWhy You + Why This Topic= Originality^2 2012幎3æ16æ¥ãç«æ倧åŠæ± è¢ãã£ã³ãã¹ è¬åž«ïŒå®®åŽãç§å€ª
32. åèæç® (çºè¡šè«ææªæ²èŒã®ãã®) Brown, R. W. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press. Enfield, N. (ed.) 2002. Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hopper, P. 1998. Emergent grammar. In Tomasello, M. (ed.) The new psychology of language (pp. 155-175). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Port, R. 2009. The dynamics of language. In Myers, R. (ed.) Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science (pp. 2310â2323). London: Springer. Tomasello, M. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press. Tulving, E. 2002. Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 1â25. 25 NLP2010