Essay on Friedrich Nietzsche Nietzsche Essay on Nietzsche Essay on Nietzsche Antichrist Nietzsche Nietzsche: Morality Essay

1. Essay on Friedrich Nietzsche
Friedrich Nietzsche was born near Rocken a small town in the Prussian province of Saxony, on
October 15, 1844. Ironically the philosopher who rejected religion and coined the phrase "god is
dead" was descended from a line of respected clergymen. Nietzsche completed his secondary
education at the exacting boarding school of Pforta. A brilliant student, he received rigorous training
in Latin, Greek, and German. In 1864 the young man entered the University of Bonn to study
theology and classical philology. A year later, however, he abandoned theology and transferred to the
University of Leipzig to pursue a doctorate in philology. At Leipzig Nietzsche became an ardent
admirer of philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer, whose work he accidentally...show more content...
Subtitled "A Book for Free Spirits," Human All–too–Human also signaled the beginning of
Nietzsche's break with Wagner. Nietzsche resigned from his professorship in 1879 owing to chronic
ill health; he had long suffered from paralyzing migraine headaches, and brief military service in the
Franco–Prussian War left him shattered. Afterward he existed on a university pension as an
unassuming gentleman lodger at resorts in Italy, France, and Switzerland. Yet his intellectual revolt
continued unabated over the next decade. Though almost constantly in pain he produced, to quote
Thomas Mann, "stylistically dazzling books –– works sparkling with audacious insults to his age,
venturing into more and more radical psychology, radiating a more and more glaring white light."
The Gay Science (1882), which Nietzsche regarded as his most personal book, includes sustained
discussions of truth, art, and knowledge. Then, in 1883 and 1884, Nietzsche published the first
three sections of Thus Spoke Zarathustra; the fourth part, completed in 1885, did not appear until
1892. Cast as a series of parables about a prophet who proclaims the death of God and challenges
mankind to face its destiny, Zarathustra is a mine of ideas and perhaps Nietzsche's most popular
work. "Zarathustra is in a way a document of our time, and it surely has much to do with our own
psychological condition," noted Jung.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Nietzsche
There are many different types of moral theory. One, the divine command theory, states that the
moral code by which we should abide comes down to us from the ten commandments of God. There
is also Kant's view that reason dictates the commandments of morality. The moral law, according to
Kant, is derivable from our own rational faculties and, not surprisingly, God's ten commandments can
be found along with other maxims in our rationality. However, Nietzsche ascribed to neither of these
views. Born in 1844, Nietzsche was influenced by Darwin and philosophers such as Schopenhauer.
His moral theory mirrored more that of Hume's in sticking to the tenants of naturalism than it
resembled deontological theories such as Kant's. The 18th century...show more content...
In such a world, death is not to be feared, since it represents nothing more significant than the fitting
conclusion of a life devoted to personal gain.
All of this is, of course, a variety of nihilism. Nietzsche insists that there are no rules for human life,
no absolute values, no certainties on which to rely. If truth can be achieved at all, it can come only
from an individual who purposefully disregards everything that is traditionally taken to be
"important." Such a super–human person {Ger. Гњbermensch}, Nietzsche supposed, can live an
authentic and successful human life. 

Beyond Good and Evil
Nietzsche offered a quasi–historical account of the harmful consequences of traditional ethics in Zur
Geneologie der Moral (On the Genealogy of Morals) (1887). "Good" initially and properly
designated only the right of those individuals with social and political power to live their lives by
sheer force of will. But a "priestly" caste, motivated by their resentment of their natural superiors,
generated a corrupt alternative that would appeal to "the herd" of less capable persons, turning
values inside–out. In the "slave morality" endorsed by religious establishments, Nietzsche argued,
forceful action which should be admired gets labelled as "evil," while the cowardly tendency to think
through everything in advance is transformed into the supposed virtue of prudence.
Genuine autonomy, Nietzsche maintained,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Essay on Nietzsche
Nietzsche
I think that the three questions that I will try to find answers are highly interconnected with each
other and because of this reason, I will not answer them separately. I will be answering them without
order.
First of all, from my interpretation of Nietzsche, modern humanity did not invent the idea of God.
Rather the God had a functional role from his point of view. There is no doubt that, modern
humanity had the idea of God, but in my opinion, this idea was like a heritage to the modern
humanity from their ancestors. We should look at the earlier times of the history in order to
understand the roots of the invention of God.
At this point, I agree with Magnus' opinion, as he asserts that at the early moments of the...show
more content...
"Will to power" in Nietzsche can be seen as a natural disposition. But now the critical point comes,
because the human beings misinterpreted the "Will to power", it became a part the bad conscience.
Human beings needed internal comfort or let us say peace of mind. So what was vital to achieve
this? They needed to legitimize their brutal and illogical practices and experiences. So, after all we
see that people invented the idea of God to do that. As people felt more and more indebt ness to
their ancestors and also achieve more and more superiorities, they victimized new borne beings. So
bad conscience was some sort of an interconnection between the ancestors and the following
generations.
As I said earlier, the ancestors began to represent God. So from my point of view, it was the will
to power and also the legitimizing the violence of people behind the invention of the God. I can
give many examples at this point. For example in the second essay of "Genealogy of Morals", it
is said that Trojan War was a part of the God's Festival. I think that people legitimized the war by
creating God. Also they used the God motive behind the reason of war. Also apart from Nietzsche, I
want to give another example. When we look at the Holy Wars, we observe that the main effective
motive seems to be the religious reasons, but I do not think that it is the case. It was the objective of
conquering and maintaining power in those regions both politically and
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Essay on Nietzsche
An Analysis of Nietzsche's On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense Friedrich Nietzsche's On Truth
and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense represents a deconstruction of the modern epistemological project.
Instead of seeking for truth, he suggests that the ultimate truth is that we have to live without such
truth, and without a sense of longing for that truth. This revolutionary work of his is divided into two
main sections. The first part deals with the question on what is truth? Here he discusses the
implication of language to our acquisition of knowledge. The second part deals with the dual nature
of man, i.e. the rational and the intuitive. He establishes that neither rational nor intuitive man is
ever successful in their pursuit of knowledge due...show more content...
He once more establishes his point by saying that "this peace treaty brings in its wake something
which appears to be the first step toward acquiring that puzzling truth drive" (Nietzsche 452).
Furthermore, he argues that "a uniformly valid and binding designation is invented for things, and
this legislation of language likewise establishes the first laws of truth. For the contrast between truth
and lie arises here for the first time" (Nietzsche 452–453). In other words, Nietzsche establishes his
foundation of truth as opposed to lies. Since the development of language, all its representations are,
according to Nietzsche, lies. Language is a form of self–deception, which humans have created to
convince themselves that the unreal is real. Indeed, Nietzsche asks, "Is language the adequate
expression of all realities?" (Nietzsche 453). The emphasis here is the one to one correspondence of
an object to that of its spoken word.
For example, when I a rainbow, the first thing that I associate with it is color. Almost anyone
would understand me if associate the word "color" to the object "rainbow". However, consider the
following scenario: what if you were never exposed to color? Since you were born into this world,
you were kept inside a house that had only shades of gray. In short, what if the world you consider
as real is all in black and white? Now consider that this person saw a "rainbow" outside his window
for the first
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

5. Antichrist Nietzsche
The transvaluation of all values is a concept from the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche. Friedrich
Nietzsche was born in a small town in the Prussian province of Saxony. Ironically the philosopher
who rejected religion and coined the phrase "god is dead" was a descendant of respected clergymen.
Nietzsche's critique of religion is largely based on his critique of Christianity. He states that he
dislikes religion especially Christianity because it encourages and promotes slave morality.
Nietzsche claims that there are two types of morality, master–morality and slave–morality. Master
morality is found in the ruling class while the ruled posses the latter. Master–morality is where the
master is the judge and creator of values. A morality that...show more content...
He attacked tradition while calling for a new society and culture. Nietzsche wanted to transcend
modernity for a whole new mode of culture and society that would create stronger and more fully
developed humans. Nietzsche wrote during a period of great German economic expansion and
industrialization. This was a period in history that a lot of changes were taking place in the country
and in the world. People were also trying to get their place in society as everything around them was
changing.
Nietzsche believes that moral philosophers also call for the destruction of life. He believes that
philosophers who say people seek happiness are unwilling to answer the truth about power. Moral
philosophers call for virtues to reach happiness. Nietzsche claims that pleasure is a sensation of
power and if passions are excluded, you prevent the greatest sensations of power.
Nietzsche hopes there will be a transvaluation of values so that the Will of Power will take
prominence. It states in the text," Need I say expressly after all thus that they will be free, very free
spirits, these philosophers of the future." (pg.222) Nietzsche introduces the Will to Power in
opposition to the old Christian values of compassion. According to Nietzsche, Christians reject the
Will to Power and suppress it
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

6. Nietzsche: Morality Essay
Morality Essay
Have you ever asked yourself where your conscience comes from? The feeling that takes a hold
of you when you do what you feel is wrong. This feeling is almost like a consequence when you
tell a lie or commit a crime. Your conscience helps you sort out the good and bad and feels your
mind with sorrow when you see a sad story on the news or gives you the initiative to donate money
to a contribution. But where does it come from. Is it something you are naturally born with, taught
over time or given to you by a higher power? This argument leads to the existence of moral values by
many philosophers including William Lane Craig. One of his excerpts argues that if there is an
existence of moral values, which some people agree,...show more content...
With this said, Nietzsche would not agree with Craig. His idea on perspectivism also shows that
he would not agree. One idea is the real verse the apparent world, which he states that language and
grammar tricks us to imagine there is an "essence" for what makes up the things we see. For
example the idea that "lightening flashes" is false because in reality the lightening is the flash. He
would use this in his argument towards the existence of moral values and God because not everyone
sees things the same way. Nietzsche's examples show that he does not believe in moral values
and does not believe in God. Craig argues back with Nietzsche's idea that proclaimed that the
death of God meant the destruction of all meaning and value in life. In William's excerpt he says
that Nietzsche is right but we've got to be careful because the question is not "must we believe in
God in order to live a moral life?" Craig doesn't believe that we do. Nor is the question: Can we
recognize objective moral values without believing in God? Because he does believe that you can
recognize them. Rather, the question is: If God does not exist, do objective morals exist? Craig
proves that they do by explaining that actions such as rape, torture, and child abuse aren't just
socially acceptable behavior. And that they are moral abominations and that there are some things
that are really wrong and everyone knows it. Craig also says in his excerpt that even
Get more content on HelpWriting.net