Nicholas Fredich placed an advertisement in a newspaper seeking applications for the job of bookkeeper. He then stole the résumé and identity of one of the respondents and used the person’s information to apply for a bookkeeping position at Clean World Engineering, Ltd. After two weeks of working at Clean World, he claimed he had an emergency and he took several days off. Then it was discovered that many checks were missing and Fredich had forged the checks. Fredich had complete access to the checks during his employment at Clean World. Some of these forged checks were deposited into a bank and paid by MidAmerica Bank. MidAmerica did not contest the fact that it paid the checks bearing the forged signatures, but it argued that Clean World did not exercise ordinary care. Given these facts, who should bear the loss, MidAmerica or Clean World? [ Clean World Engineering, Ltd. v. MidAmerica Federal Savings Bank, 341 Ill. App. 3d 992, 793 N.E.2d 110 (2003).] Solution Given the facts, since Nicholas was in the employment of Clean World, when he forged the checks and encashed them from MidAmerica Bank, it is clear that the losses owing to the forged checks should be borne by Clean World only. The bank is clearly absolved of its liability, since it considered the cheques to be be genuinely issued and hence encashed the same..