SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
CICERO 
Marcus Tullius Cicero, English byname Tully (born 106 bce, Arpinum, Latium [now 
Arpino, Italy]—died Dec. 7, 43 bce, Formiae, Latium [now Formia]), Roman statesman, lawyer, 
scholar, and writer who vainly tried to uphold republican principles in the final civil wars that 
destroyed the Roman Republic. His writings include books of rhetoric, orations, philosophical 
and political treatises, and letters. He is remembered in modern times as the greatest Roman 
orator and innovator of what became known as Ciceronian rhetoric. 
Cicero studied philosophy under the Epicurean Phaedrus (c. 140–70 bce), the Stoic 
Diodotus (died c. 60 bce), and the Academic Philo of Larissa (c. 160–80 bce), and thus he had a 
thorough grounding in three of the four main schools of philosophy. Cicero called himself an 
Academic, but this applied chiefly to his theory of knowledge, in which he preferred to be 
guided by probability rather than to allege certainty; in this way, he justified contradictions in 
his own works (see also epistemology: Ancient Skepticism). In ethics he was more inclined to 
dogmatism and was attracted by the Stoics, but for his authority he looked behind the Stoics to 
Socrates. In religion he was an agnostic most of his life, but he had religious experiences of 
some profundity during an early visit to Eleusis and at the death of his daughter in 45. He 
usually writes as a theist, but the only religious exaltation in his writings is to be found in the 
“Somnium Scipionis” (“Scipio’s Dream”) at the end of De republica. 
Cicero did not write seriously on philosophy before about 54, a period of uneasy 
political truce, when he seems to have begun De republica, following it with De legibus (begun 
in 52). These writings were an attempt to interpret Roman history in terms of Greek political 
theory. The bulk of his philosophical writings belong to the period between February 45 and 
November 44. His output and range of subjects were astonishing: the lost De consolatione, 
prompted by his daughter’s death; Hortensius, an exhortation to the study of philosophy, which 
proved instrumental in St. Augustine’s conversion; the difficult Academica (Academic 
Philosophy), which defends suspension of judgement; De finibus, (is it pleasure, virtue, or 
something more complex?); and De officiis (Moral Obligation). Except in the last book of De 
officiis, Cicero lays no claim to originality in these works. Writing to Atticus, he says of them, 
“They are transcripts; I simply supply words, and I’ve plenty of those.” His aim was to provide 
Rome with a kind of philosophical encyclopaedia. He derived his material from Stoic, Academic, 
Epicurean, and Peripatetic sources. The form he used was the dialogue, but his models were 
Aristotle and the scholar Heracleides Ponticus rather than Plato. Cicero’s importance in the 
history of philosophy is as a transmitter of Greek thought. In the course of this role, he gave 
Rome and, therefore, Europe its philosophical vocabulary.1 
1

More Related Content

What's hot

Brief historical introduction
Brief historical introductionBrief historical introduction
Brief historical introductionNoel Jopson
 
existentialism
existentialism existentialism
existentialism Qaidian
 
Structuralism: Lecture for Research Paradigms (FOAR 701)
Structuralism: Lecture for Research Paradigms (FOAR 701)Structuralism: Lecture for Research Paradigms (FOAR 701)
Structuralism: Lecture for Research Paradigms (FOAR 701)Greg Downey
 
African philosophy: Hegel's Perspective.
African philosophy: Hegel's Perspective.African philosophy: Hegel's Perspective.
African philosophy: Hegel's Perspective.Sindiga Omori
 
Sartre presentatIN wESTERN pHILOSOPHICAL AND pOLITICAL THOUGHT
Sartre presentatIN wESTERN pHILOSOPHICAL AND pOLITICAL THOUGHTSartre presentatIN wESTERN pHILOSOPHICAL AND pOLITICAL THOUGHT
Sartre presentatIN wESTERN pHILOSOPHICAL AND pOLITICAL THOUGHTAgnes Fernandez
 
Moralistic approach
Moralistic approachMoralistic approach
Moralistic approachGolda Albert
 
Tomberg and anthroposophy
Tomberg and anthroposophyTomberg and anthroposophy
Tomberg and anthroposophyElsa von Licy
 
The final presentation novel (1)
The final presentation novel (1)The final presentation novel (1)
The final presentation novel (1)Beesh Ahmed
 
Claude Levi Strauss
 Claude Levi Strauss Claude Levi Strauss
Claude Levi StraussLaura Clarke
 

What's hot (11)

Brief historical introduction
Brief historical introductionBrief historical introduction
Brief historical introduction
 
existentialism
existentialism existentialism
existentialism
 
Structuralism: Lecture for Research Paradigms (FOAR 701)
Structuralism: Lecture for Research Paradigms (FOAR 701)Structuralism: Lecture for Research Paradigms (FOAR 701)
Structuralism: Lecture for Research Paradigms (FOAR 701)
 
African philosophy: Hegel's Perspective.
African philosophy: Hegel's Perspective.African philosophy: Hegel's Perspective.
African philosophy: Hegel's Perspective.
 
Sartre presentatIN wESTERN pHILOSOPHICAL AND pOLITICAL THOUGHT
Sartre presentatIN wESTERN pHILOSOPHICAL AND pOLITICAL THOUGHTSartre presentatIN wESTERN pHILOSOPHICAL AND pOLITICAL THOUGHT
Sartre presentatIN wESTERN pHILOSOPHICAL AND pOLITICAL THOUGHT
 
Moralistic approach
Moralistic approachMoralistic approach
Moralistic approach
 
Romanticism
RomanticismRomanticism
Romanticism
 
Tomberg and anthroposophy
Tomberg and anthroposophyTomberg and anthroposophy
Tomberg and anthroposophy
 
The final presentation novel (1)
The final presentation novel (1)The final presentation novel (1)
The final presentation novel (1)
 
Ss 2008 180
Ss 2008 180Ss 2008 180
Ss 2008 180
 
Claude Levi Strauss
 Claude Levi Strauss Claude Levi Strauss
Claude Levi Strauss
 

Similar to New microsoft word document

Presentation (6).pdf
Presentation (6).pdfPresentation (6).pdf
Presentation (6).pdfPratham900360
 
Historical Development of Logic
Historical Development of LogicHistorical Development of Logic
Historical Development of LogicSherwin Daquioag
 
A Literary And Philosophical Commentary To Seneca NQ 3
A Literary And Philosophical Commentary To Seneca NQ 3A Literary And Philosophical Commentary To Seneca NQ 3
A Literary And Philosophical Commentary To Seneca NQ 3Andrea Porter
 
Western phılosophy ın modern culture.pptx
Western phılosophy ın modern culture.pptxWestern phılosophy ın modern culture.pptx
Western phılosophy ın modern culture.pptxDishaBansod1
 
Phılsophy ın ancıent culture-1.pptx
Phılsophy ın ancıent culture-1.pptxPhılsophy ın ancıent culture-1.pptx
Phılsophy ın ancıent culture-1.pptxMahekPande
 
Slide T H E A G E O F C L A S S I C I S M (1700 1784)
Slide  T H E  A G E  O F  C L A S S I C I S M (1700 1784)Slide  T H E  A G E  O F  C L A S S I C I S M (1700 1784)
Slide T H E A G E O F C L A S S I C I S M (1700 1784)gueste2476b
 
A Controversy About The Natural Frame Of Reference And A Universal Science
A Controversy About The Natural Frame Of Reference And A Universal ScienceA Controversy About The Natural Frame Of Reference And A Universal Science
A Controversy About The Natural Frame Of Reference And A Universal ScienceRichard Hogue
 
Structuralism-theory Literary Criti.pptx
Structuralism-theory Literary Criti.pptxStructuralism-theory Literary Criti.pptx
Structuralism-theory Literary Criti.pptxCarmelaZafra
 
The study of literary movements
The study of literary movementsThe study of literary movements
The study of literary movementsAbdel-Fattah Adel
 
9.ax.1 Political Realism History.pptx
9.ax.1 Political Realism History.pptx9.ax.1 Political Realism History.pptx
9.ax.1 Political Realism History.pptxAbdul Hadi Ilman
 
Marcus tullius cicero
Marcus tullius ciceroMarcus tullius cicero
Marcus tullius ciceroMiYa6
 
The-Birth-and-Growth-of-the-Social-Sciences.docx
The-Birth-and-Growth-of-the-Social-Sciences.docxThe-Birth-and-Growth-of-the-Social-Sciences.docx
The-Birth-and-Growth-of-the-Social-Sciences.docxSALVESBUENA
 
Lecture 4. Medieval philosophy.ppt
Lecture 4. Medieval philosophy.pptLecture 4. Medieval philosophy.ppt
Lecture 4. Medieval philosophy.pptMayankMittal213356
 
Multimedia assignment #2
Multimedia assignment #2Multimedia assignment #2
Multimedia assignment #2LouisDorta
 
Restoration period (1660 1798)
Restoration period (1660 1798)Restoration period (1660 1798)
Restoration period (1660 1798)TAYYABA MAHR
 

Similar to New microsoft word document (20)

Famous philosophers
Famous philosophersFamous philosophers
Famous philosophers
 
Presentation (6).pdf
Presentation (6).pdfPresentation (6).pdf
Presentation (6).pdf
 
Philosophers
PhilosophersPhilosophers
Philosophers
 
Historical Development of Logic
Historical Development of LogicHistorical Development of Logic
Historical Development of Logic
 
A Literary And Philosophical Commentary To Seneca NQ 3
A Literary And Philosophical Commentary To Seneca NQ 3A Literary And Philosophical Commentary To Seneca NQ 3
A Literary And Philosophical Commentary To Seneca NQ 3
 
Western phılosophy ın modern culture.pptx
Western phılosophy ın modern culture.pptxWestern phılosophy ın modern culture.pptx
Western phılosophy ın modern culture.pptx
 
Phılsophy ın ancıent culture-1.pptx
Phılsophy ın ancıent culture-1.pptxPhılsophy ın ancıent culture-1.pptx
Phılsophy ın ancıent culture-1.pptx
 
Slide T H E A G E O F C L A S S I C I S M (1700 1784)
Slide  T H E  A G E  O F  C L A S S I C I S M (1700 1784)Slide  T H E  A G E  O F  C L A S S I C I S M (1700 1784)
Slide T H E A G E O F C L A S S I C I S M (1700 1784)
 
A Controversy About The Natural Frame Of Reference And A Universal Science
A Controversy About The Natural Frame Of Reference And A Universal ScienceA Controversy About The Natural Frame Of Reference And A Universal Science
A Controversy About The Natural Frame Of Reference And A Universal Science
 
Structuralism-theory Literary Criti.pptx
Structuralism-theory Literary Criti.pptxStructuralism-theory Literary Criti.pptx
Structuralism-theory Literary Criti.pptx
 
The study of literary movements
The study of literary movementsThe study of literary movements
The study of literary movements
 
Russian Formalism
Russian FormalismRussian Formalism
Russian Formalism
 
9.ax.1 Political Realism History.pptx
9.ax.1 Political Realism History.pptx9.ax.1 Political Realism History.pptx
9.ax.1 Political Realism History.pptx
 
Marcus tullius cicero
Marcus tullius ciceroMarcus tullius cicero
Marcus tullius cicero
 
The-Birth-and-Growth-of-the-Social-Sciences.docx
The-Birth-and-Growth-of-the-Social-Sciences.docxThe-Birth-and-Growth-of-the-Social-Sciences.docx
The-Birth-and-Growth-of-the-Social-Sciences.docx
 
Lecture 4. Medieval philosophy.ppt
Lecture 4. Medieval philosophy.pptLecture 4. Medieval philosophy.ppt
Lecture 4. Medieval philosophy.ppt
 
Larida
LaridaLarida
Larida
 
Multimedia assignment #2
Multimedia assignment #2Multimedia assignment #2
Multimedia assignment #2
 
Greek literature
Greek literatureGreek literature
Greek literature
 
Restoration period (1660 1798)
Restoration period (1660 1798)Restoration period (1660 1798)
Restoration period (1660 1798)
 

New microsoft word document

  • 1. CICERO Marcus Tullius Cicero, English byname Tully (born 106 bce, Arpinum, Latium [now Arpino, Italy]—died Dec. 7, 43 bce, Formiae, Latium [now Formia]), Roman statesman, lawyer, scholar, and writer who vainly tried to uphold republican principles in the final civil wars that destroyed the Roman Republic. His writings include books of rhetoric, orations, philosophical and political treatises, and letters. He is remembered in modern times as the greatest Roman orator and innovator of what became known as Ciceronian rhetoric. Cicero studied philosophy under the Epicurean Phaedrus (c. 140–70 bce), the Stoic Diodotus (died c. 60 bce), and the Academic Philo of Larissa (c. 160–80 bce), and thus he had a thorough grounding in three of the four main schools of philosophy. Cicero called himself an Academic, but this applied chiefly to his theory of knowledge, in which he preferred to be guided by probability rather than to allege certainty; in this way, he justified contradictions in his own works (see also epistemology: Ancient Skepticism). In ethics he was more inclined to dogmatism and was attracted by the Stoics, but for his authority he looked behind the Stoics to Socrates. In religion he was an agnostic most of his life, but he had religious experiences of some profundity during an early visit to Eleusis and at the death of his daughter in 45. He usually writes as a theist, but the only religious exaltation in his writings is to be found in the “Somnium Scipionis” (“Scipio’s Dream”) at the end of De republica. Cicero did not write seriously on philosophy before about 54, a period of uneasy political truce, when he seems to have begun De republica, following it with De legibus (begun in 52). These writings were an attempt to interpret Roman history in terms of Greek political theory. The bulk of his philosophical writings belong to the period between February 45 and November 44. His output and range of subjects were astonishing: the lost De consolatione, prompted by his daughter’s death; Hortensius, an exhortation to the study of philosophy, which proved instrumental in St. Augustine’s conversion; the difficult Academica (Academic Philosophy), which defends suspension of judgement; De finibus, (is it pleasure, virtue, or something more complex?); and De officiis (Moral Obligation). Except in the last book of De officiis, Cicero lays no claim to originality in these works. Writing to Atticus, he says of them, “They are transcripts; I simply supply words, and I’ve plenty of those.” His aim was to provide Rome with a kind of philosophical encyclopaedia. He derived his material from Stoic, Academic, Epicurean, and Peripatetic sources. The form he used was the dialogue, but his models were Aristotle and the scholar Heracleides Ponticus rather than Plato. Cicero’s importance in the history of philosophy is as a transmitter of Greek thought. In the course of this role, he gave Rome and, therefore, Europe its philosophical vocabulary.1 1