Narrative Review Checklist.pdf
•
0 likes•189 views
This document provides a checklist for authors to use when writing a narrative literature review. The checklist outlines the key sections that should be included such as an abstract, introduction, methods, discussion/summary, and references. It specifies the information that should be reported in each section, for example the introduction should describe the rationale and specify the key questions for review, while the methods section outlines the process for identifying and selecting the literature. The checklist is intended to help authors structure their narrative review and ensure all important elements are addressed.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
How to write a research proposal
How to write research proposals for both scientific proposals and business.
Just a basic guideline to follow.
Interpretation of the Arterial Blood Gas analysis
The document discusses the basics of acid-base balance, the role of kidneys in homeostasis, and a step-wise approach to diagnosing acid-base disorders from arterial blood gas results including evaluating pH, PCO2, HCO3, and other electrolytes and looking at changes from normal values. It also covers proper sampling techniques for arterial blood gases and interpreting various values calculated from the measured results.
principles of preoperative evaluation and preparation.pptx
The importance of preoperative assessment and evaluation to prepare the patient to surgical procedure is directly proportional with the degree of successful of any surgical procedure.
So, good preoperative assessment and evolution is necessary to avoid the morbidity and mortality that expected to the surgical procedures.
Hemodynamic monitoring
This document provides an overview of hemodynamic monitoring principles in the ICU. It discusses the steps for assessing global and regional perfusion, including initial clinical assessment and basic monitoring of vital signs and lactate levels. It then covers monitoring of preload and fluid responsiveness, methods for measuring cardiac output, assessing cardiac contractility and tissue perfusion. A variety of invasive and non-invasive monitoring techniques are explained, from pulmonary artery catheters and arterial waveform analysis to echocardiography, near-infrared spectroscopy and analysis of the microcirculation. Key principles emphasized are that no single monitor determines outcomes, and monitoring needs may change over time based on equipment and integrating multiple variables.
The topic of the British thesis combines academic theories with th.docx
The topic of the British thesis combines academic theories with the topics to be studied, and goes to Google Scholar. This is the most basic search.
It is also a prerequisite to ensure that you can write smoothly in the future. At least look at the academic materials. This blog post continues to send you a report on the opening of the so-called proposal. The UK dissertation format is basically the same, especially in business. Don't choose topics that are empty, don't choose topics that are not in academic concepts.
No matter what field of research you are, no matter what research method you choose, all research plans must address the following questions: 1. What are you going to achieve; 2. Why do you want to do this; 3. You will How to do this; the research plan should have enough concentration to convince the teacher, if you have an important research idea, or if you have a good idea of the relevant literature and major issues, then your research The original idea of the plan was successful. The quality of your research plan does not depend on the quality of your ideas, because a good research project may be rejected for the simple reason that the copy supporting the project is not well written, so your writing is a large part. 1. What needs to be written in the research plan? The research plan has a basic writing structure. You can refer to the structure and adjust it according to your own research theme. 1. Title Page The cover page writes the title and author, which is easy to understand. You need to know what you want to say from the Title. 2.Astract summary is about 200 words, this part is a brief summary of research topics, goals, and research methods. It is important to write out the general questions of research questions, research reasons, etc. in this part. About 300 words or so. 3.Table of Contents Contents 4.Introduction Introduction This section can state your research background, research questions, research purposes and meaning (focus), including: 1) research purposes 2) provide context (references) to highlight the importance of research Sex 3) Provide the theoretical basis of the research and explain why it is worth doing this research 4) Briefly introduce the main problems and sub-questions to be solved in your research 5) Explain your hypothesis (if necessary) 5.Background(Literature Review) This part of the research background can also be used as a part of the literature review to present your research questions, reviewing previous studies for comment and analysis. Therefore, you need to read the relevant subject literature, and sort through and analyze the previous research by searching, reading, and analyzing the literature. This requires a certain amount of retrieval ability and a certain number of papers and books to be summarized and summarized into a literature review, which is a relatively long time. 6. Mainbody (Hypothesis, Methodology, Research Design) The main part of RP can describe your research hypothe.
Elements of research
This document outlines the key elements that should be included in a research proposal or report. It discusses the various sections such as the title page, abstract, introduction, literature review, methodology, analysis, discussion, conclusion, and references. The introduction provides background on the topic and significance of the study. The literature review summarizes previous research on the topic. The methodology describes the research design, participants, instruments, and analysis plan. The document provides guidance on how to structure each section to effectively communicate the research.
837 Unit 9 Report Writing Dr. Zaheer Ahmad.pptx
This document outlines the structure and key components of a research report. It begins by defining a research report as a completed study describing an investigation that addresses questions, collects and analyzes data, and draws conclusions. The document then discusses the main sections of a research report, including the introductory section with components like the title page and abstract, the main body with literature review and methodology, and the reference section. It provides details on what each section and subsection should contain to clearly communicate the research process and findings.
Parts of a research paper educ 241
The document outlines the typical parts and structure of a research paper. It discusses the importance of key sections like the introduction, literature review, methodology, results, and conclusion. It provides details on what each section generally contains, such as stating the problem in the introduction, describing the sampling procedure in methodology, and presenting findings and recommendations in the results and conclusion. The overall purpose is to systematically plan and conduct research.
Recommended
How to write a research proposal
How to write research proposals for both scientific proposals and business.
Just a basic guideline to follow.
Interpretation of the Arterial Blood Gas analysis
The document discusses the basics of acid-base balance, the role of kidneys in homeostasis, and a step-wise approach to diagnosing acid-base disorders from arterial blood gas results including evaluating pH, PCO2, HCO3, and other electrolytes and looking at changes from normal values. It also covers proper sampling techniques for arterial blood gases and interpreting various values calculated from the measured results.
principles of preoperative evaluation and preparation.pptx
The importance of preoperative assessment and evaluation to prepare the patient to surgical procedure is directly proportional with the degree of successful of any surgical procedure.
So, good preoperative assessment and evolution is necessary to avoid the morbidity and mortality that expected to the surgical procedures.
Hemodynamic monitoring
This document provides an overview of hemodynamic monitoring principles in the ICU. It discusses the steps for assessing global and regional perfusion, including initial clinical assessment and basic monitoring of vital signs and lactate levels. It then covers monitoring of preload and fluid responsiveness, methods for measuring cardiac output, assessing cardiac contractility and tissue perfusion. A variety of invasive and non-invasive monitoring techniques are explained, from pulmonary artery catheters and arterial waveform analysis to echocardiography, near-infrared spectroscopy and analysis of the microcirculation. Key principles emphasized are that no single monitor determines outcomes, and monitoring needs may change over time based on equipment and integrating multiple variables.
The topic of the British thesis combines academic theories with th.docx
The topic of the British thesis combines academic theories with the topics to be studied, and goes to Google Scholar. This is the most basic search.
It is also a prerequisite to ensure that you can write smoothly in the future. At least look at the academic materials. This blog post continues to send you a report on the opening of the so-called proposal. The UK dissertation format is basically the same, especially in business. Don't choose topics that are empty, don't choose topics that are not in academic concepts.
No matter what field of research you are, no matter what research method you choose, all research plans must address the following questions: 1. What are you going to achieve; 2. Why do you want to do this; 3. You will How to do this; the research plan should have enough concentration to convince the teacher, if you have an important research idea, or if you have a good idea of the relevant literature and major issues, then your research The original idea of the plan was successful. The quality of your research plan does not depend on the quality of your ideas, because a good research project may be rejected for the simple reason that the copy supporting the project is not well written, so your writing is a large part. 1. What needs to be written in the research plan? The research plan has a basic writing structure. You can refer to the structure and adjust it according to your own research theme. 1. Title Page The cover page writes the title and author, which is easy to understand. You need to know what you want to say from the Title. 2.Astract summary is about 200 words, this part is a brief summary of research topics, goals, and research methods. It is important to write out the general questions of research questions, research reasons, etc. in this part. About 300 words or so. 3.Table of Contents Contents 4.Introduction Introduction This section can state your research background, research questions, research purposes and meaning (focus), including: 1) research purposes 2) provide context (references) to highlight the importance of research Sex 3) Provide the theoretical basis of the research and explain why it is worth doing this research 4) Briefly introduce the main problems and sub-questions to be solved in your research 5) Explain your hypothesis (if necessary) 5.Background(Literature Review) This part of the research background can also be used as a part of the literature review to present your research questions, reviewing previous studies for comment and analysis. Therefore, you need to read the relevant subject literature, and sort through and analyze the previous research by searching, reading, and analyzing the literature. This requires a certain amount of retrieval ability and a certain number of papers and books to be summarized and summarized into a literature review, which is a relatively long time. 6. Mainbody (Hypothesis, Methodology, Research Design) The main part of RP can describe your research hypothe.
Elements of research
This document outlines the key elements that should be included in a research proposal or report. It discusses the various sections such as the title page, abstract, introduction, literature review, methodology, analysis, discussion, conclusion, and references. The introduction provides background on the topic and significance of the study. The literature review summarizes previous research on the topic. The methodology describes the research design, participants, instruments, and analysis plan. The document provides guidance on how to structure each section to effectively communicate the research.
837 Unit 9 Report Writing Dr. Zaheer Ahmad.pptx
This document outlines the structure and key components of a research report. It begins by defining a research report as a completed study describing an investigation that addresses questions, collects and analyzes data, and draws conclusions. The document then discusses the main sections of a research report, including the introductory section with components like the title page and abstract, the main body with literature review and methodology, and the reference section. It provides details on what each section and subsection should contain to clearly communicate the research process and findings.
Parts of a research paper educ 241
The document outlines the typical parts and structure of a research paper. It discusses the importance of key sections like the introduction, literature review, methodology, results, and conclusion. It provides details on what each section generally contains, such as stating the problem in the introduction, describing the sampling procedure in methodology, and presenting findings and recommendations in the results and conclusion. The overall purpose is to systematically plan and conduct research.
101-Types-of-Review-Salim_Marcus_Turin.pdf
This document summarizes different types of literature reviews that are commonly used in health research. It discusses 8 major types of reviews: literature review, critical review, scoping review, systematic review, meta-analysis, qualitative systematic review, realist review, and review of reviews. For each type of review, it provides a brief description, discusses their methodology using the Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, Analysis (SALSA) framework, and notes their strengths and weaknesses. The document aims to provide beginners with an overview of different review types and their implications for practice.
Weighing the EvidenceThis is for Masters of Science in NursingW.docx
Weighing the Evidence
*This is for Masters of Science in Nursing
When conducting original research, the final step researchers must complete is weighing the evidence and interpreting the meanings of their data, statistics, and analyses. This is the culmination of the research process in which all of the research methods and designs can be synthesized into a meaningful conclusion. In this stage, researchers should formulate explanations for what their data indicates, determine whether the data answers their initial research question, identify areas of uncertainty, and consider directions for further research.
In this Discussion, you focus on one of the research articles that you identified for Part 2 of the Course Project (Literature Review). You then explore the process of how the researchers generated conclusions based on their data, consider other possible interpretations of their data, and formulate ideas for further research.
To prepare:
·
Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on how researchers find meaning in their data and generate sound conclusions. Pay particular attention to Table 2 in the article, “Study Design in Medical Research.”
·
Revisit the 5 articles that you identified in Part 2 of the Course Project. Select one to consider for the purpose of this Discussion.
·
Read sections of the chosen article where the data is presented, analyzed, and interpreted for meaning. What reasoning process did the researchers use to formulate their conclusions? What explanation did they give to support their conclusions? Were there any weaknesses in their analysis or conclusions?
·
Consider possible alternate conclusions that the researchers could have drawn based on their data.
·
Examine the findings that the article presents and consider how well they addressed the researcher’s initial question(s). What additional research could be done to build on these findings and gain a fuller understanding of the question?
PLEASE ADDRESS OR ANSWER AND EMPHASIZE THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS BELOW FOR MY ASSIGNMENT:
1.
An
APA citation and brief summary of the research article
that you selected.
2.
Describe the
data and the results of any statistical tests or analyses
presented in the article.
3.
Explain
how the researchers formulated their conclusion, any weaknesses in their analysis or conclusions, and offer at least one alternate interpretation of their data
.
4.
Propose
at least one additional research study that could be done to further investigate this research topic.
Required Resources
Readings
·
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012).
Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice
(Laureate Education, Inc., custom ed.).
Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
o
Review Chapter 2, Fig. 2.1
o
Chapter 27, “Systematic Reviews of Research Evidence: Meta-analysis, Metasynthesis, and Mixed Studies Review”
This chapter focuses on the different types of systematic reviews. The chapter discusses the.
research report.docx
This document provides guidelines for writing a research report, including formatting and content requirements for each section. The main body should be divided into chapters with titles and headings. It should include: an introduction with background and significance; a literature review; methodology; findings; discussion; and a conclusion with implications, limitations and recommendations. References and appendices follow the main content. Each section has specific requirements - for example, the introduction describes the research problem and objectives, while the methodology explains the design, sample, and data analysis. Following these guidelines will help to clearly organize and present the different components of a research study.
2nd lectures research
This document provides an overview of research methods and the research proposal process. It discusses key components of a research proposal including selecting a topic, developing research questions and objectives, reviewing relevant literature, and describing the proposed methodology. The methodology section outlines important aspects such as research design, sampling approach, data collection methods, and data analysis. Developing a strong research proposal is important as it provides a plan for conducting research and allows supervisors to evaluate the study.
RESEARCH METHODS LESSON 2
This document provides an overview of research methods and the research proposal process. It discusses key components of a research proposal including selecting a topic, developing research questions and objectives, reviewing relevant literature, and describing the proposed methodology. The methodology section should address the research design, population, sampling technique, data collection instruments, and data analysis plan. Developing a strong proposal is important to obtain approval for the study and guide the research process.
Module Name Strategic Business ProjectModule Co.docx
Module Name: Strategic Business Project
Module Code: BUSN 11076
Module Coordinator: Dr Chee Seng Chan
Student: XXX
Banner ID: XXXXXXXX
Research Title: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Abstract
XXXXXXXXXXX
Acknowledgement
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Table of Content
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Reference
Appendix
“The title of your questionnaire”
The full content of your questionnaire
SBP��ҵս����Ŀ�����IJο�����/1. SBP��Ŀ˵��/SBP Structure and Contents.pptx
SBP Structure and Contents
It is suggested that you adopt the following format in presenting your SBP:
1. Title Page: Please use the standard cover page attached as per prescribed in SBP Handbook.
2. Abstract: It should provide a brief summary of the SBP not exceeding 300 words
3. Acknowledgements: Acknowledgements of outside help and support.
4. Table of Contents: It should list the sequence with page numbers of all relevant subdivisions of the dissertation; i.e. chapter headings, section and sub-section (if appropriate).
5. List of Tables
6. List of Figures / Illustrations
SBP Structure and Contents
7. Chapter 1: Introduction
8. Chapter 2: Literature Review
9. Chapter 3: Theoretical Framework and Research Methodology
10. Chapter 4: Data Presentation, Analysis and Findings
11. Chapter 5: Conclusion (s) and Recommendations
12. Reference List: The SB should include a list of all relevant texts / journals used following the Harvard Referencing System / Style. Please refer to Referencing Guide .
13. Appendices: The appendices should only include material that is not central to the arguments in the main text.
SBP Marking Criteria/ GuidePercentageMargin (up to 5%)SupervisorExaminer 2SupervisorExaminer 2Abstract, introduction, continuity and presentation (15%)Literature review (25%)Research Methods (20%)Results & Discussion ( 30%)Conclusion & Recommendations( 10%)
1. Abstract, introduction, continuity and presentation (15%)
In general, your markers will assess the clarity of stated aims and objectives, relevance to sector related issues, feasibility of aims of SBP, the rationale and significance of the research undertaken.
Title: is the title focused, summative, and does it reflect the proposed SBPcontent?
Abstract: is it short (300 words), self-contained, summative, objective, precise and easy to read.
Introduction: is background information included? Is an introduction to current research included and developed? An introduction to the organisation (if applicable)?
1. Abstract, introduction, continuity and presentation (15%)
Have you demonstrated the relevance of your SBP to the field and is it theoretically grounded? Links to relevant literature and academic debates, the evidence of extensive reading will be valued.
Aim(s): is the aim feasible and manageable (have resource and data accessibility been taken into account)? Is the aim original and does it have the potential to add insights to the field of study? D.
GE1-Writing A Research Paper-Lagman.pptx
This document outlines the typical structure and components of a research paper. It explains that a research paper provides an in-depth analysis of a single topic based on empirical evidence. The major sections include an introduction with a statement of the problem and conceptual framework, a literature review of related studies and theories, a methodology section describing the research design and instruments, a presentation of the data analysis and findings, and a conclusion with recommendations. Each section has specific purposes and elements to include.
purposive communication in complex world
The document discusses research and its characteristics. It defines research as the systematic investigation of phenomena through collection, analysis and interpretation of facts. Research has key characteristics - it is empirical, logical, cyclical, analytical, critical and methodical. Research can be basic, applied or empirical. The different parts of a research paper are also outlined, including the introduction, methodology, results and discussion, and references. Research methodology involves identifying a problem, research design, data collection and analysis.
StuDe.ppt
This document provides guidance on conducting health research and summarizing research findings. It outlines the key steps in the research process, including selecting a topic, reviewing existing literature, developing a proposal, collecting and analyzing data, and writing a final report. The final report should include an abstract, introduction, methodology, results, discussion, conclusions, and recommendations sections. Engaging medical students in research helps improve important skills and can promote future research involvement.
What is research
The document defines research and outlines its key characteristics and importance. It discusses the characteristics of researchers and the qualities of good researchers. It also describes the different types of research and outlines the typical stages in the research process, including defining the problem, planning, data collection/analysis, and reporting. Finally, it discusses some ethical considerations and interfaces in conducting research.
Undertaking a literature review
This document provides a step-by-step guide for undertaking a literature review. It begins by defining different types of literature reviews, including traditional/narrative reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. It then outlines the typical steps in a literature review process, including selecting a topic, searching the literature, gathering/analyzing sources, and writing the review. Key steps include refining the topic, using appropriate search methods and databases, analyzing sources, and systematically reviewing the literature. The goal is to help students and novice researchers better understand the literature review process.
8.0 RESEARCH METHODS These guidelines address postgr.docx
8.0 RESEARCH METHODS
These guidelines address postgraduate students who have completed course
requirements and assumed to have sufficient background experience of high-level
engagement activities like recognizing, relating, applying, generating, reflecting and
theorizing issues. It is an ultimate period in our academic life when we feel confident
at embarking on independent research.
It cannot be overemphasized that we must enjoy the experience of research process
and not look at it as an academic chore.
To enable such a desired behaviour, these guidelines consider the research process
in terms of the skills and knowledge needed to develop independent and critical
styles of thinking in order to evaluate and use research as well as to conduct fresh
research.
The guidelines should be viewed as briefs which the Research Supervisors are expected
to exemplify based on their own experience as well as expertise.
8.1 Chapter 1 - Introduction
INTRODUCE the subject or problem to be studied. This might require the
identification of key managerial concerns, theories, laws and governmental rulings,
critical incidents or social changes, and current environmental issues, that make the
subject critical, relevant and worthy of managerial or research attention.
• To inform the Reader (stylistically - forthright, direct, and brief / concise),
• The first sentence should begin with `This Study was intended
to’….’ And immediately tell the Reader the nature of the study for the
reader's interest and desire to read on.
8.1.1 The Research Problem
What is the statement of the problem? The statement of the problem or problem
statement should follow logically from what has been set forth in the background of
the problem by defining the specific research need providing impetus for the
study, a need not met through previous research. Present a clear and precise
statement of the central question of research, formulated to address the need.
8.1.2 The Purpose of the Study
What is the purpose of the study? What are the RESEARCH QUESTION (S) of
the study? What are the specific objective (s) of the study? Define the specific
research objective (s) that would answer the research Question (s) of the study.
8.1.3 The Rationale of the Study:
1. Why in a general sense?
2. One or two brief references to previous research or theories critical in structuring
this study to support and understand the rationale.
3. The importance of the study for the reader to know, to fully appreciate the need
for the study - and its significance.
4. Own professional experience that stimulated the study or aroused interest in the
area of research.
5. The Need for the Study - will deal with valid questions or professional concerns
to provide data leading to an answer - reference to literature helpful and
appropriate.
8.1.4 The Significance of the Study:
1. Clearly .
Critical evaluation of biomedical literature - clinical pharmacy
Reviewing the ‘Biomedical Literature’ poses a great challenge to the clinical professionals.
Evaluating a scientific article is a complex task.
Knowledge of the standard anatomy of an article and idiosyncrasy of various types of studies will assist the reader to review the ‘Biomedical Literature’ efficiently
Biomedical Literature includes critical appraisal of the following contents:
Title
Abstract
Introduction
Objective
Materials and Methods
Study Designs
Bias
Statistics
Results and Analysis
Discussion and Conclusion
References
Research proposal
This presentation gives essential insights to learners on how to write a professional Research proposal
CritiqueofNursingResearchfinal-adjusted.pdf
This document provides an overview of critiquing nursing research. It defines critiquing as the critical evaluation of research studies using specific criteria to make objective judgments. The purpose is to assess strengths and weaknesses. When critiquing, the researcher qualifications, problem statement, literature review, methodology, and findings should be evaluated. Guidelines are provided on how to systematically critique each component of a research study. The presentation emphasizes that critiquing improves research skills and the development of evidence-based practices.
protocol writing in clinical research
This document provides an overview of protocol writing for clinical research. It defines a research protocol as outlining the study plan to safely answer research questions while protecting participants. The summary outlines key components of a protocol including objectives, methodology, and management plans. A protocol allows researchers to plan, review steps, and guide the investigation. Developing a protocol requires considering factors like the research question, importance, methods, and resources needed before writing each required component.
Writing a research protocol 2011
The document provides guidance on writing a research protocol, including its key components and characteristics. A well-written protocol should clearly state the research question/problem and aim, justify the need for the study, and outline the methodology in sufficient detail. Key sections include an introduction with objectives, methods, and ethical/gender considerations. The protocol guides the research plan and must be adhered to strictly.
CHAPTER 2-REVIEW-OF-RELATED-LITIRATURE.pptx
This document provides guidance on reviewing related literature and studies. It discusses that a review of related literature focuses primarily on academic sources like publications, books and journals to provide a comprehensive understanding of existing theoretical and empirical work on the research topic. Meanwhile, a review of related studies offers an overview of all relevant studies from both academic and non-academic sources to demonstrate the relevance and applicability of findings to the topic. The document also outlines the importance of reviewing literature and studies, which is to lay the foundation and guide the researcher in designing various aspects of the study.
Malimu research protocol
This document outlines the key components and considerations for developing an effective research protocol. It discusses what constitutes research and its importance for advancing knowledge and improving health. The major sections of a research protocol are described, including title, investigators, introduction/background, rationale, objectives, methodology, study design, instruments, activities plan, data analysis, ethics, expected outcomes, dissemination, budget, and references. Developing a strong protocol is emphasized as the foundation for a successful research project. Advice provided includes developing a timeline, obtaining necessary approvals, and producing a concise summary of the proposed research.
DrPH SEMESTER 2 BLOCK SCHEDULE SESSION 2023-2024.pdf
This document outlines the timetable and schedule for the Semester 2 Doctor of Public Health program session for 2023/2024. It includes the modules, module coordinators, class and exam dates, as well as a weekly schedule detailing the daily classes and topics. The semester runs from February to June 2024, with classes each weekday and topics including health communication, epidemiology, demography, research methods, biostatistics and tropical diseases. Exams are scheduled for June to July 2024.
LAPORAN HARIAN COVID-19 NEGERI KEDAH 11.04.2022.pptx
300 new COVID-19 cases were reported in Kedah on 11 April 2022. The majority of new cases were from symptomatic screening (60.67%). Kota Setar had the highest number of new cases at 59. Bed occupancy rates at hospitals and quarantine centers in Kedah remained low. Vaccination rates in Kedah remained high, with over 89.7% of adults receiving two doses and over 98.1% of teenagers receiving two doses. Vaccination rates for boosters remained below 60% across most districts.
More Related Content
Similar to Narrative Review Checklist.pdf
101-Types-of-Review-Salim_Marcus_Turin.pdf
This document summarizes different types of literature reviews that are commonly used in health research. It discusses 8 major types of reviews: literature review, critical review, scoping review, systematic review, meta-analysis, qualitative systematic review, realist review, and review of reviews. For each type of review, it provides a brief description, discusses their methodology using the Search, Appraisal, Synthesis, Analysis (SALSA) framework, and notes their strengths and weaknesses. The document aims to provide beginners with an overview of different review types and their implications for practice.
Weighing the EvidenceThis is for Masters of Science in NursingW.docx
Weighing the Evidence
*This is for Masters of Science in Nursing
When conducting original research, the final step researchers must complete is weighing the evidence and interpreting the meanings of their data, statistics, and analyses. This is the culmination of the research process in which all of the research methods and designs can be synthesized into a meaningful conclusion. In this stage, researchers should formulate explanations for what their data indicates, determine whether the data answers their initial research question, identify areas of uncertainty, and consider directions for further research.
In this Discussion, you focus on one of the research articles that you identified for Part 2 of the Course Project (Literature Review). You then explore the process of how the researchers generated conclusions based on their data, consider other possible interpretations of their data, and formulate ideas for further research.
To prepare:
·
Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on how researchers find meaning in their data and generate sound conclusions. Pay particular attention to Table 2 in the article, “Study Design in Medical Research.”
·
Revisit the 5 articles that you identified in Part 2 of the Course Project. Select one to consider for the purpose of this Discussion.
·
Read sections of the chosen article where the data is presented, analyzed, and interpreted for meaning. What reasoning process did the researchers use to formulate their conclusions? What explanation did they give to support their conclusions? Were there any weaknesses in their analysis or conclusions?
·
Consider possible alternate conclusions that the researchers could have drawn based on their data.
·
Examine the findings that the article presents and consider how well they addressed the researcher’s initial question(s). What additional research could be done to build on these findings and gain a fuller understanding of the question?
PLEASE ADDRESS OR ANSWER AND EMPHASIZE THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS BELOW FOR MY ASSIGNMENT:
1.
An
APA citation and brief summary of the research article
that you selected.
2.
Describe the
data and the results of any statistical tests or analyses
presented in the article.
3.
Explain
how the researchers formulated their conclusion, any weaknesses in their analysis or conclusions, and offer at least one alternate interpretation of their data
.
4.
Propose
at least one additional research study that could be done to further investigate this research topic.
Required Resources
Readings
·
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012).
Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice
(Laureate Education, Inc., custom ed.).
Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
o
Review Chapter 2, Fig. 2.1
o
Chapter 27, “Systematic Reviews of Research Evidence: Meta-analysis, Metasynthesis, and Mixed Studies Review”
This chapter focuses on the different types of systematic reviews. The chapter discusses the.
research report.docx
This document provides guidelines for writing a research report, including formatting and content requirements for each section. The main body should be divided into chapters with titles and headings. It should include: an introduction with background and significance; a literature review; methodology; findings; discussion; and a conclusion with implications, limitations and recommendations. References and appendices follow the main content. Each section has specific requirements - for example, the introduction describes the research problem and objectives, while the methodology explains the design, sample, and data analysis. Following these guidelines will help to clearly organize and present the different components of a research study.
2nd lectures research
This document provides an overview of research methods and the research proposal process. It discusses key components of a research proposal including selecting a topic, developing research questions and objectives, reviewing relevant literature, and describing the proposed methodology. The methodology section outlines important aspects such as research design, sampling approach, data collection methods, and data analysis. Developing a strong research proposal is important as it provides a plan for conducting research and allows supervisors to evaluate the study.
RESEARCH METHODS LESSON 2
This document provides an overview of research methods and the research proposal process. It discusses key components of a research proposal including selecting a topic, developing research questions and objectives, reviewing relevant literature, and describing the proposed methodology. The methodology section should address the research design, population, sampling technique, data collection instruments, and data analysis plan. Developing a strong proposal is important to obtain approval for the study and guide the research process.
Module Name Strategic Business ProjectModule Co.docx
Module Name: Strategic Business Project
Module Code: BUSN 11076
Module Coordinator: Dr Chee Seng Chan
Student: XXX
Banner ID: XXXXXXXX
Research Title: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Abstract
XXXXXXXXXXX
Acknowledgement
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Table of Content
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Reference
Appendix
“The title of your questionnaire”
The full content of your questionnaire
SBP��ҵս����Ŀ�����IJο�����/1. SBP��Ŀ˵��/SBP Structure and Contents.pptx
SBP Structure and Contents
It is suggested that you adopt the following format in presenting your SBP:
1. Title Page: Please use the standard cover page attached as per prescribed in SBP Handbook.
2. Abstract: It should provide a brief summary of the SBP not exceeding 300 words
3. Acknowledgements: Acknowledgements of outside help and support.
4. Table of Contents: It should list the sequence with page numbers of all relevant subdivisions of the dissertation; i.e. chapter headings, section and sub-section (if appropriate).
5. List of Tables
6. List of Figures / Illustrations
SBP Structure and Contents
7. Chapter 1: Introduction
8. Chapter 2: Literature Review
9. Chapter 3: Theoretical Framework and Research Methodology
10. Chapter 4: Data Presentation, Analysis and Findings
11. Chapter 5: Conclusion (s) and Recommendations
12. Reference List: The SB should include a list of all relevant texts / journals used following the Harvard Referencing System / Style. Please refer to Referencing Guide .
13. Appendices: The appendices should only include material that is not central to the arguments in the main text.
SBP Marking Criteria/ GuidePercentageMargin (up to 5%)SupervisorExaminer 2SupervisorExaminer 2Abstract, introduction, continuity and presentation (15%)Literature review (25%)Research Methods (20%)Results & Discussion ( 30%)Conclusion & Recommendations( 10%)
1. Abstract, introduction, continuity and presentation (15%)
In general, your markers will assess the clarity of stated aims and objectives, relevance to sector related issues, feasibility of aims of SBP, the rationale and significance of the research undertaken.
Title: is the title focused, summative, and does it reflect the proposed SBPcontent?
Abstract: is it short (300 words), self-contained, summative, objective, precise and easy to read.
Introduction: is background information included? Is an introduction to current research included and developed? An introduction to the organisation (if applicable)?
1. Abstract, introduction, continuity and presentation (15%)
Have you demonstrated the relevance of your SBP to the field and is it theoretically grounded? Links to relevant literature and academic debates, the evidence of extensive reading will be valued.
Aim(s): is the aim feasible and manageable (have resource and data accessibility been taken into account)? Is the aim original and does it have the potential to add insights to the field of study? D.
GE1-Writing A Research Paper-Lagman.pptx
This document outlines the typical structure and components of a research paper. It explains that a research paper provides an in-depth analysis of a single topic based on empirical evidence. The major sections include an introduction with a statement of the problem and conceptual framework, a literature review of related studies and theories, a methodology section describing the research design and instruments, a presentation of the data analysis and findings, and a conclusion with recommendations. Each section has specific purposes and elements to include.
purposive communication in complex world
The document discusses research and its characteristics. It defines research as the systematic investigation of phenomena through collection, analysis and interpretation of facts. Research has key characteristics - it is empirical, logical, cyclical, analytical, critical and methodical. Research can be basic, applied or empirical. The different parts of a research paper are also outlined, including the introduction, methodology, results and discussion, and references. Research methodology involves identifying a problem, research design, data collection and analysis.
StuDe.ppt
This document provides guidance on conducting health research and summarizing research findings. It outlines the key steps in the research process, including selecting a topic, reviewing existing literature, developing a proposal, collecting and analyzing data, and writing a final report. The final report should include an abstract, introduction, methodology, results, discussion, conclusions, and recommendations sections. Engaging medical students in research helps improve important skills and can promote future research involvement.
What is research
The document defines research and outlines its key characteristics and importance. It discusses the characteristics of researchers and the qualities of good researchers. It also describes the different types of research and outlines the typical stages in the research process, including defining the problem, planning, data collection/analysis, and reporting. Finally, it discusses some ethical considerations and interfaces in conducting research.
Undertaking a literature review
This document provides a step-by-step guide for undertaking a literature review. It begins by defining different types of literature reviews, including traditional/narrative reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. It then outlines the typical steps in a literature review process, including selecting a topic, searching the literature, gathering/analyzing sources, and writing the review. Key steps include refining the topic, using appropriate search methods and databases, analyzing sources, and systematically reviewing the literature. The goal is to help students and novice researchers better understand the literature review process.
8.0 RESEARCH METHODS These guidelines address postgr.docx
8.0 RESEARCH METHODS
These guidelines address postgraduate students who have completed course
requirements and assumed to have sufficient background experience of high-level
engagement activities like recognizing, relating, applying, generating, reflecting and
theorizing issues. It is an ultimate period in our academic life when we feel confident
at embarking on independent research.
It cannot be overemphasized that we must enjoy the experience of research process
and not look at it as an academic chore.
To enable such a desired behaviour, these guidelines consider the research process
in terms of the skills and knowledge needed to develop independent and critical
styles of thinking in order to evaluate and use research as well as to conduct fresh
research.
The guidelines should be viewed as briefs which the Research Supervisors are expected
to exemplify based on their own experience as well as expertise.
8.1 Chapter 1 - Introduction
INTRODUCE the subject or problem to be studied. This might require the
identification of key managerial concerns, theories, laws and governmental rulings,
critical incidents or social changes, and current environmental issues, that make the
subject critical, relevant and worthy of managerial or research attention.
• To inform the Reader (stylistically - forthright, direct, and brief / concise),
• The first sentence should begin with `This Study was intended
to’….’ And immediately tell the Reader the nature of the study for the
reader's interest and desire to read on.
8.1.1 The Research Problem
What is the statement of the problem? The statement of the problem or problem
statement should follow logically from what has been set forth in the background of
the problem by defining the specific research need providing impetus for the
study, a need not met through previous research. Present a clear and precise
statement of the central question of research, formulated to address the need.
8.1.2 The Purpose of the Study
What is the purpose of the study? What are the RESEARCH QUESTION (S) of
the study? What are the specific objective (s) of the study? Define the specific
research objective (s) that would answer the research Question (s) of the study.
8.1.3 The Rationale of the Study:
1. Why in a general sense?
2. One or two brief references to previous research or theories critical in structuring
this study to support and understand the rationale.
3. The importance of the study for the reader to know, to fully appreciate the need
for the study - and its significance.
4. Own professional experience that stimulated the study or aroused interest in the
area of research.
5. The Need for the Study - will deal with valid questions or professional concerns
to provide data leading to an answer - reference to literature helpful and
appropriate.
8.1.4 The Significance of the Study:
1. Clearly .
Critical evaluation of biomedical literature - clinical pharmacy
Reviewing the ‘Biomedical Literature’ poses a great challenge to the clinical professionals.
Evaluating a scientific article is a complex task.
Knowledge of the standard anatomy of an article and idiosyncrasy of various types of studies will assist the reader to review the ‘Biomedical Literature’ efficiently
Biomedical Literature includes critical appraisal of the following contents:
Title
Abstract
Introduction
Objective
Materials and Methods
Study Designs
Bias
Statistics
Results and Analysis
Discussion and Conclusion
References
Research proposal
This presentation gives essential insights to learners on how to write a professional Research proposal
CritiqueofNursingResearchfinal-adjusted.pdf
This document provides an overview of critiquing nursing research. It defines critiquing as the critical evaluation of research studies using specific criteria to make objective judgments. The purpose is to assess strengths and weaknesses. When critiquing, the researcher qualifications, problem statement, literature review, methodology, and findings should be evaluated. Guidelines are provided on how to systematically critique each component of a research study. The presentation emphasizes that critiquing improves research skills and the development of evidence-based practices.
protocol writing in clinical research
This document provides an overview of protocol writing for clinical research. It defines a research protocol as outlining the study plan to safely answer research questions while protecting participants. The summary outlines key components of a protocol including objectives, methodology, and management plans. A protocol allows researchers to plan, review steps, and guide the investigation. Developing a protocol requires considering factors like the research question, importance, methods, and resources needed before writing each required component.
Writing a research protocol 2011
The document provides guidance on writing a research protocol, including its key components and characteristics. A well-written protocol should clearly state the research question/problem and aim, justify the need for the study, and outline the methodology in sufficient detail. Key sections include an introduction with objectives, methods, and ethical/gender considerations. The protocol guides the research plan and must be adhered to strictly.
CHAPTER 2-REVIEW-OF-RELATED-LITIRATURE.pptx
This document provides guidance on reviewing related literature and studies. It discusses that a review of related literature focuses primarily on academic sources like publications, books and journals to provide a comprehensive understanding of existing theoretical and empirical work on the research topic. Meanwhile, a review of related studies offers an overview of all relevant studies from both academic and non-academic sources to demonstrate the relevance and applicability of findings to the topic. The document also outlines the importance of reviewing literature and studies, which is to lay the foundation and guide the researcher in designing various aspects of the study.
Malimu research protocol
This document outlines the key components and considerations for developing an effective research protocol. It discusses what constitutes research and its importance for advancing knowledge and improving health. The major sections of a research protocol are described, including title, investigators, introduction/background, rationale, objectives, methodology, study design, instruments, activities plan, data analysis, ethics, expected outcomes, dissemination, budget, and references. Developing a strong protocol is emphasized as the foundation for a successful research project. Advice provided includes developing a timeline, obtaining necessary approvals, and producing a concise summary of the proposed research.
Similar to Narrative Review Checklist.pdf (20)
Weighing the EvidenceThis is for Masters of Science in NursingW.docx
Weighing the EvidenceThis is for Masters of Science in NursingW.docx
Module Name Strategic Business ProjectModule Co.docx
Module Name Strategic Business ProjectModule Co.docx
8.0 RESEARCH METHODS These guidelines address postgr.docx
8.0 RESEARCH METHODS These guidelines address postgr.docx
Critical evaluation of biomedical literature - clinical pharmacy
Critical evaluation of biomedical literature - clinical pharmacy
More from KeirelEdrin
DrPH SEMESTER 2 BLOCK SCHEDULE SESSION 2023-2024.pdf
This document outlines the timetable and schedule for the Semester 2 Doctor of Public Health program session for 2023/2024. It includes the modules, module coordinators, class and exam dates, as well as a weekly schedule detailing the daily classes and topics. The semester runs from February to June 2024, with classes each weekday and topics including health communication, epidemiology, demography, research methods, biostatistics and tropical diseases. Exams are scheduled for June to July 2024.
LAPORAN HARIAN COVID-19 NEGERI KEDAH 11.04.2022.pptx
300 new COVID-19 cases were reported in Kedah on 11 April 2022. The majority of new cases were from symptomatic screening (60.67%). Kota Setar had the highest number of new cases at 59. Bed occupancy rates at hospitals and quarantine centers in Kedah remained low. Vaccination rates in Kedah remained high, with over 89.7% of adults receiving two doses and over 98.1% of teenagers receiving two doses. Vaccination rates for boosters remained below 60% across most districts.
governance of public health practices globallypptx.pptx
The document summarizes the important individuals and agencies that constitute global health governance. It identifies several key intergovernmental organizations focused on global health, including the World Health Organization, United Nations agencies like UNICEF and UNAIDS, and other international bodies. It also discusses important non-governmental organizations in global health like Doctors Without Borders. The document then outlines some of the core functions of the WHO and issues that can arise with global health initiatives, such as a lack of coordination and sustainability.
governance of public health practices globallypptx.pptx
The document discusses the important individuals and agencies that constitute global health governance. It identifies several United Nations agencies and intergovernmental organizations that focus on global health, such as the World Health Organization, UNICEF, and the World Bank. It also discusses non-governmental organizations like Doctors Without Borders and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The document outlines some of the core functions of the WHO and issues that global health initiatives have faced, such as parallel systems undermining health system development. It calls for new governance models that balance national interests with global cooperation.
Current ethical issues in PH Final.pptx
Common ethical issues arise in public health activities related to surveillance, outbreak response, health promotion, and screening programs. Regarding surveillance and outbreak response, issues of privacy, confidentiality, and autonomy emerge when health information is collected and shared. For health promotion, ensuring voluntary participation while avoiding undue influence is important. Screening programs require informed consent, confidentiality to prevent stigma, and addressing potential harms of false results. These ethical issues could have severe consequences if not properly addressed, such as loss of trust and discrimination. Methods to prevent problems include strong legal protections, informed and voluntary participation, and minimizing risks of stigma or psychological harm.
Importance of media and health literacy in public.pptx
Health literacy in Malaysia is important for effective public health communication. Many Malaysians have low levels of health literacy and rely on media for health information. Improving health literacy through clear media reporting on health issues can help Malaysians make better health decisions.
Allocating resources for healthcare.pptx
This document summarizes frameworks for priority setting and resource allocation in healthcare systems. It discusses three main categories of frameworks: 1) PBMA frameworks which use deliberative processes to determine funding and disinvestment decisions, 2) HTA frameworks which produce evidence to inform decision making on health technologies, and 3) MCDA frameworks which consider multiple criteria and stakeholder input in decision making. It also discusses ethics considerations in resource allocation including balancing efficiency, equity and fairness, and managing disagreements around prioritizing best outcomes versus fair chances. Fair decision making processes require transparency, relevance of reasons used, ability to revise decisions, and enforcement of procedural fairness.
Information Bias.pptx
Information bias arises from errors in collecting or measuring data in a study. There are three main forms of information bias: self-reporting bias, measurement error bias, and confirmation bias. Self-reporting bias occurs when participants provide inaccurate self-reported data due to issues like social desirability bias or recall bias. Measurement error bias results from inaccurate measurements due to device errors or environmental factors. Confirmation bias is the tendency to interpret evidence as confirming one's preexisting beliefs. Various methods can help reduce biases, such as shortening recall periods, using validation scales, calibration, statistical techniques, blinding procedures, and independent confirmation of results.
Group 1.pdf
This document provides a detailed overview of the systematic process for developing and validating questionnaires for survey research. It outlines 7 key steps: 1) Set clear aims; 2) Define attributes; 3) Write a plan; 4) Develop and write items; 5) Select items; 6) Assess reliability; and 7) Evaluate validity. The first 4 steps focus on designing the questionnaire, while the last 3 steps deal with validation. Validation involves content validation, cognitive interviews, pilot testing, and psychometric evaluation including factor analysis and reliability testing. Following these steps helps ensure a rigorous and valid questionnaire is developed.
More from KeirelEdrin (9)
DrPH SEMESTER 2 BLOCK SCHEDULE SESSION 2023-2024.pdf
DrPH SEMESTER 2 BLOCK SCHEDULE SESSION 2023-2024.pdf
LAPORAN HARIAN COVID-19 NEGERI KEDAH 11.04.2022.pptx
LAPORAN HARIAN COVID-19 NEGERI KEDAH 11.04.2022.pptx
governance of public health practices globallypptx.pptx
governance of public health practices globallypptx.pptx
governance of public health practices globallypptx.pptx
governance of public health practices globallypptx.pptx
Importance of media and health literacy in public.pptx
Importance of media and health literacy in public.pptx
Recently uploaded
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)Academy of Science of South Africa
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
BBR 2024 Summer Sessions Interview Training
Qualitative research interview training by Professor Katrina Pritchard and Dr Helen Williams
The Diamonds of 2023-2024 in the IGRA collection
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective UpskillingExcellence Foundation for South Sudan
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP Module
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS Template 2023-2024 by: Irene S. Rueco
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptxMohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Recently uploaded (20)
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold Method
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
South African Journal of Science: Writing with integrity workshop (2024)
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
Pride Month Slides 2024 David Douglas School District
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Azure Interview Questions and Answers PDF By ScholarHat
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
Your Skill Boost Masterclass: Strategies for Effective Upskilling
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
RPMS TEMPLATE FOR SCHOOL YEAR 2023-2024 FOR TEACHER 1 TO TEACHER 3
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Digital Artefact 1 - Tiny Home Environmental Design
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Pengantar Penggunaan Flutter - Dart programming language1.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Narrative Review Checklist.pdf
- 1. 1-1 Narrative Review Checklist Section/Topic Item No Item Reported on Page Number/Line Number Reported on Section/Paragraph TITLE Title 1 Identify the report as a Narrative Review or Literature Review. ABSTRACT Structured summary 2 Provide a structured summary with the subsections as: objective, background, methods, conclusion (1). INTRODUCTION Rationale/background 3 Describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known. Objectives 4 Specify the key question(s) identified for the review topic. METHODS Research selection 5 Specify the process for identifying the literature search (eg, years considered, language, publication status, study design, and databases of coverage). DISCUSSION/SUMMARY Narrative 6 Discuss: 1) research reviewed including fundamental or key findings, 2) limitations and/or quality of research reviewed, and 3) need for future research. Summary 7 Provide an overall interpretation of the narrative review in the context of clinical practice and/or the Nutrition Care Process for registered dietitian nutritionists, clinical practice for other health professionals, policy development and implementation, or future research. Reference 1. Green BN, Johnson CD, Adams A. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. J Sports Chiropr Rehabil 2001;15:5–19. Updated on March 3, 2021 2/10-19 Methods 2-23/21-6 Results 1/1 Title 1/13-22 Introduction 2/1-7 Objectives 23 and 24/8-23 and 1-17 Conclusion and Key Points Article information: https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/ajo-21-16 *As the checklist was provided upon initial submission, the page number/line number reported may be changed due to copyediting and may not be referable in the published version. In this case, the section/paragraph may be used as an alternative reference. Abstract Abstract