The document discusses the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) role in ensuring worker safety regarding nanotechnology. It outlines NIOSH's major programs and initiatives, including developing interim safety guidelines, researching nanoparticle toxicity, and creating an online library of nanomaterial information. The document reviews NIOSH's strategic plan to fill knowledge gaps through initiatives like characterizing health effects, developing exposure assessment methods, and collaborating internationally.
This document summarizes the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) efforts regarding nanotechnology safety and health. It discusses that NIOSH is leading research to understand potential health impacts of nanomaterials and how to control risks. Some of NIOSH's major initiatives include studying mechanisms of nanoparticle toxicity, developing characterization and exposure monitoring methods, and investigating occupational exposure and controls. The document also reviews NIOSH's strategic plan to build a research program to address challenges of this emerging technology and fill knowledge gaps regarding understanding and preventing potential health issues from nanoparticles and applying nanotechnology safely.
How will the Clinicians, Patients and Consumers of the Future ensure appropri...SharpBrains
*Dr. Eddie Martucci, Co-Founder and CEO of Akili Interactive Labs
*Dr. Anna Wexler, science writer, filmmaker and postdoc fellow at the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy at UPenn’s Perelman School of Medicine
*Dr. Olivier Oullier, President of EMOTIV
*Dr. Peter Reiner, Co-Founder of the National Core for Neuroethics at the University of British Columbia
*Chaired by: Dr. Alison Fenney, Executive Director of the Neurotechnology Industry Organization (NIO)
*Álvaro Fernández, CEO and Editor-in-Chief of SharpBrains
*Sarah Lenz Lock, Senior Vice President for Policy at AARP and Executive Director of the Global Council on Brain Health (GCBH)
*Dr. April Benasich, Director of the Baby Lab at the Rutgers Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience
*Chaired by: Dr. Cori Lathan, Co-Chair of the World Economic Forum’s Council on the Future of Human Enhancement
Slidedeck supporting session held during the 2017 SharpBrains Virtual Summit: Brain Health & Enhancement in the Digital Age (December 5-7th). Learn more at: https://sharpbrains.com/summit-2017/
It’s an expensive und exhausting run against time: It takes approximately 2,3 billion Dollars and 12 years to bring a drug to the market. This leaves only 8 years until the expiration of the patent to bring back sufficient return on investments. So far, this has worked out well for the industry but the run is getting steeper every year: on the one hand, it becomes increasingly complex and expensive to develop new drugs, on the other hand prizes are under scrutiny. Hence, the industry is sitting on a time bomb, as the day will come when the returns will not cover the investments anymore and the innovation pipeline will dry out because bringing new drugs to the market does no longer offer any financial incentives.
What can be done about this scenario? Eventually (and hopefully), these projections prove wrong as there is still a lot to be gained by efficiency improvement through digitalizing all along the value chain – after all healthcare still is one of the least digitalized industries. Will this be enough – or do we have to reinvent healthcare innovation in a radical new way?
This DayOne Experts Event showcased some game changing ideas and discussed their feasibility and impact with an expert panel and the audience. These slides are just the intro to this Event.
Onc safer guides to safe ehr jan302014_pptKristenReiter3
The document introduces the SAFER Guides, which are tools designed to help healthcare organizations assess and improve the safety of their electronic health record (EHR) systems. The SAFER Guides were developed over 2 years through an expert panel and stakeholder input. They include foundational guides on leadership and infrastructure as well as clinical process guides. The guides contain specific recommended practices that organizations can implement, along with examples and references, to enhance EHR safety. The document emphasizes that optimizing EHR safety requires a multidisciplinary team approach and engagement from technology vendors. The SAFER Guides are intended to help organizations proactively address EHR safety issues.
Günter Oberdorster_How to assess the risks of nanotechnology?Ne3LS_Network
The document summarizes a presentation on assessing the risks of nanotechnology. The presentation covered characteristics of nanoparticles that influence toxicity, dosing in the respiratory tract, biokinetics, and protein interactions. It also discussed challenges in hazard/risk characterization including determining appropriate testing strategies, accounting for acute vs chronic effects, dosimetry issues, and extrapolating risks from animals to humans. The presentation highlighted differences between nanoparticles and larger particles in terms of deposition in the respiratory tract, translocation to organs, and cellular effects.
The document summarizes key topics related to nanosafety in a nanomaterials and nanotechnology course taught by Dr. XA Sun. It discusses potential hazards of nanomaterials, important considerations for nanosafety including proper personal protective equipment, engineering controls, and safe handling practices. It also notes challenges in characterizing nanomaterials and a lack of standards and regulations. The document emphasizes the need for more research on nanosafety and collaboration between researchers and environmental health and safety experts to develop effective safety protocols and practices.
Nanotoxicology is the study of the toxicity of nanomaterials. As the size of particles decreases, their surface area increases, allowing more of their atoms and molecules to interact with the environment and potentially cause toxic effects. Nanomaterials can enter the body through various routes and distribute to organs, where they may cause toxicity through effects like inflammation, DNA damage, and tissue damage. They may also pollute the environment through deposition in water, soil, and plants. Occupational, consumer, and environmental exposures are increasing as nanotechnology applications expand. The toxicity depends on factors like surface area, chemical composition, and ability to interact with and inhibit enzymes.
This document summarizes the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) efforts regarding nanotechnology safety and health. It discusses that NIOSH is leading research to understand potential health impacts of nanomaterials and how to control risks. Some of NIOSH's major initiatives include studying mechanisms of nanoparticle toxicity, developing characterization and exposure monitoring methods, and investigating occupational exposure and controls. The document also reviews NIOSH's strategic plan to build a research program to address challenges of nanotechnology and fill knowledge gaps regarding the safe use and development of nanotechnology in the workplace.
This document summarizes the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) efforts regarding nanotechnology safety and health. It discusses that NIOSH is leading research to understand potential health impacts of nanomaterials and how to control risks. Some of NIOSH's major initiatives include studying mechanisms of nanoparticle toxicity, developing characterization and exposure monitoring methods, and investigating occupational exposure and controls. The document also reviews NIOSH's strategic plan to build a research program to address challenges of this emerging technology and fill knowledge gaps regarding understanding and preventing potential health issues from nanoparticles and applying nanotechnology safely.
How will the Clinicians, Patients and Consumers of the Future ensure appropri...SharpBrains
*Dr. Eddie Martucci, Co-Founder and CEO of Akili Interactive Labs
*Dr. Anna Wexler, science writer, filmmaker and postdoc fellow at the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy at UPenn’s Perelman School of Medicine
*Dr. Olivier Oullier, President of EMOTIV
*Dr. Peter Reiner, Co-Founder of the National Core for Neuroethics at the University of British Columbia
*Chaired by: Dr. Alison Fenney, Executive Director of the Neurotechnology Industry Organization (NIO)
*Álvaro Fernández, CEO and Editor-in-Chief of SharpBrains
*Sarah Lenz Lock, Senior Vice President for Policy at AARP and Executive Director of the Global Council on Brain Health (GCBH)
*Dr. April Benasich, Director of the Baby Lab at the Rutgers Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience
*Chaired by: Dr. Cori Lathan, Co-Chair of the World Economic Forum’s Council on the Future of Human Enhancement
Slidedeck supporting session held during the 2017 SharpBrains Virtual Summit: Brain Health & Enhancement in the Digital Age (December 5-7th). Learn more at: https://sharpbrains.com/summit-2017/
It’s an expensive und exhausting run against time: It takes approximately 2,3 billion Dollars and 12 years to bring a drug to the market. This leaves only 8 years until the expiration of the patent to bring back sufficient return on investments. So far, this has worked out well for the industry but the run is getting steeper every year: on the one hand, it becomes increasingly complex and expensive to develop new drugs, on the other hand prizes are under scrutiny. Hence, the industry is sitting on a time bomb, as the day will come when the returns will not cover the investments anymore and the innovation pipeline will dry out because bringing new drugs to the market does no longer offer any financial incentives.
What can be done about this scenario? Eventually (and hopefully), these projections prove wrong as there is still a lot to be gained by efficiency improvement through digitalizing all along the value chain – after all healthcare still is one of the least digitalized industries. Will this be enough – or do we have to reinvent healthcare innovation in a radical new way?
This DayOne Experts Event showcased some game changing ideas and discussed their feasibility and impact with an expert panel and the audience. These slides are just the intro to this Event.
Onc safer guides to safe ehr jan302014_pptKristenReiter3
The document introduces the SAFER Guides, which are tools designed to help healthcare organizations assess and improve the safety of their electronic health record (EHR) systems. The SAFER Guides were developed over 2 years through an expert panel and stakeholder input. They include foundational guides on leadership and infrastructure as well as clinical process guides. The guides contain specific recommended practices that organizations can implement, along with examples and references, to enhance EHR safety. The document emphasizes that optimizing EHR safety requires a multidisciplinary team approach and engagement from technology vendors. The SAFER Guides are intended to help organizations proactively address EHR safety issues.
Günter Oberdorster_How to assess the risks of nanotechnology?Ne3LS_Network
The document summarizes a presentation on assessing the risks of nanotechnology. The presentation covered characteristics of nanoparticles that influence toxicity, dosing in the respiratory tract, biokinetics, and protein interactions. It also discussed challenges in hazard/risk characterization including determining appropriate testing strategies, accounting for acute vs chronic effects, dosimetry issues, and extrapolating risks from animals to humans. The presentation highlighted differences between nanoparticles and larger particles in terms of deposition in the respiratory tract, translocation to organs, and cellular effects.
The document summarizes key topics related to nanosafety in a nanomaterials and nanotechnology course taught by Dr. XA Sun. It discusses potential hazards of nanomaterials, important considerations for nanosafety including proper personal protective equipment, engineering controls, and safe handling practices. It also notes challenges in characterizing nanomaterials and a lack of standards and regulations. The document emphasizes the need for more research on nanosafety and collaboration between researchers and environmental health and safety experts to develop effective safety protocols and practices.
Nanotoxicology is the study of the toxicity of nanomaterials. As the size of particles decreases, their surface area increases, allowing more of their atoms and molecules to interact with the environment and potentially cause toxic effects. Nanomaterials can enter the body through various routes and distribute to organs, where they may cause toxicity through effects like inflammation, DNA damage, and tissue damage. They may also pollute the environment through deposition in water, soil, and plants. Occupational, consumer, and environmental exposures are increasing as nanotechnology applications expand. The toxicity depends on factors like surface area, chemical composition, and ability to interact with and inhibit enzymes.
This document summarizes the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) efforts regarding nanotechnology safety and health. It discusses that NIOSH is leading research to understand potential health impacts of nanomaterials and how to control risks. Some of NIOSH's major initiatives include studying mechanisms of nanoparticle toxicity, developing characterization and exposure monitoring methods, and investigating occupational exposure and controls. The document also reviews NIOSH's strategic plan to build a research program to address challenges of nanotechnology and fill knowledge gaps regarding the safe use and development of nanotechnology in the workplace.
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) is the U.S. agency responsible for conducting research to prevent work-related injury and illness. NIOSH provides resources for safe nanotechnology including guidance documents, a nanoparticle information library, reference materials, training, and recommendations for further research needs such as developing methods to detect nanomaterials and characterize their properties. NIOSH also conducts field research at organizations working with nanomaterials to assess exposures, practices, and make recommendations to update their guidance.
Slides for “Taking a Proactive Approach Towards Responsibility: Indications of NanoEthics and Policy Making Around the World” Emerging Industries: Nanotechnology and NanoIndicators. Conference sponsored by the National Bureau of Economic Research and the National Science Foundation. Cambridge, MA, May 15, 2008.
This document discusses a 5 day faculty development program (FDP) on emerging trends in nanotechnology and its biomedical applications organized by the Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering at APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University. It provides an agenda for the FDP including topics on nanotoxicology, safety concerns of nanoparticles, exposure routes, material safety data sheets, personal protective equipment, safety engineering equipment, disposal of nanoparticles, and information sharing to maintain a safe research environment.
Ethical Considerations and Checklist for Affective Research with WearablesMaciej Behnke
As the popularity of wearables increases, so does their utility for studying emotions. Using new technologies points to several ethical challenges to be considered to improve research designs. There are several ethical recommendations for utilizing wearables to study human emotions, but they focus on emotion recognition systems applications rather than research design and implementation. To address this gap, we have developed a perspective on wearables, especially in daily life, adapting the ReCODE Health-Digital Health Framework and companion checklist. Therefore, our framework consists of four domains: (1) participation experience, (2) privacy, (3) data management, and (4) access and usability. We identified 33 primary risks of using wearables to study emotions, including research-related negative emotions, collecting, processing, storing, sharing personal and biological information, commercial technology validity and reliability, and exclusivity issues. We also proposed possible strategies for minimizing risks. We consulted the new ethical guidelines with members of ethics committees and relevant researchers. The judges (N = 26) positively rated our solutions and provided useful feedback that helped us refine our guidance. Finally, we summarized our proposals with a checklist for researchers' convenience. Our guidelines contribute to future research by providing improved protection of participants' and scientists' interests.
Sixteen Technology Commercialisation Projects receive S$4 million Proof-of-Co...James Chan
• 16 projects receive up to S$250,000 each in this second POC grant call,
• 2 projects came from the polytechnics
• Awarded projects are in the areas of engineering, info-comm technologies,
and life sciences.
This document provides an agenda for the Neurovation event taking place on November 24th, 2017 at Radboud University in Nijmegen, Netherlands. The event will include plenary sessions in the morning and afternoon with topics around neuroscience research. In between, there will be several breakout sessions including ones on healthy lifestyles and behavioral change, neurotechnology, brain and learning, and food and cognition. Each breakout session provides more details on the topics and speakers.
Shane Ledbetter Student ID 228604 Unit VIII White Paper NanomaterialShane Ledbetter
The document discusses occupational safety considerations for manufacturing nanomaterials. It notes that nanomaterials are increasingly used but little is known about their health effects. It recommends that companies establish effective safety management systems to assess hazards, implement controls like ventilation, and monitor exposures. Engineering controls are important to minimize hazards and protect workers. A full risk assessment including identifying sources of highest exposure and background information is needed to develop an appropriate safety plan for nanomaterial production. Worker health should be the top priority.
Operational research is the scientific study of operations aimed at improving decision-making. It originated from military planning in World War II and has since expanded to various industries. In public health, operational research uses analytical methods to identify health program problems, potential solutions, and test solutions to inform evidence-based decisions around programs. It involves interdisciplinary teams that study issues like disease screening, outbreak response, and health behavior programs. Societies like IFORS and journals promote the field. Overall, operational research integrates data analysis into program management to enhance monitoring and evaluation.
This document discusses issues and best practices for the responsible development of nanomaterials. It outlines that while occupational exposure limits (OELs) are important for preventing health effects in workers, they may need more data for nanomaterials. Alternatives to traditional OELs include provisional limits, hazard banding, and emphasizing responsible development practices. Developers and manufacturers have a responsibility to ensure safe materials and products through measures like developing hazard information, applying prudent risk management, and informing workers. Collaboration between industry, government and labor is key to promoting sustainable and safe practices.
Although nanotechnology has been recognized as an enabling technology, human and environmental exposure to nanomaterials is inevitable. As such, the need to ensure that the technology and its various applications are safe is paramount. The current concern on the risks of nanotechnology tends to specialize in the potential dangers of nanomaterials and nanoparticles. The ability to predict and mitigate potential health effects is crucial for sustainability of nanotechnology. This paper introduces the reader to safety in nanotechnology. Matthew N. O. Sadiku | Uwakwe C. Chukwu | Abayomi Ajayi-Majebi | Sarhan M. Musa "Essence of Nanosafety" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-6 | Issue-1 , December 2021, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd47873.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/other-scientific-research-area/other/47873/essence-of-nanosafety/matthew-n-o-sadiku
Industry veterans and newcomers come together at 2011 neurotech leaders forumSteve John
About 60 neurotechnology industry executives, investors, and entrepreneurs gathered in San Francisco earlier this month for the 11th annual Neurotech Leaders Forum, produced by Neurotech Reports, the publisher of this newsletter.
Nanotechnology in Consumer Products: An Update on Regulatory Responses and Li...kurfirst
The document provides an overview of regulatory developments and potential litigation related to nanotechnology in consumer products. It discusses the National Nanotechnology Initiative and efforts by agencies like EPA, FDA, and NIOSH to research and potentially regulate nanomaterials. While no human health impacts have been proven yet, some animal studies suggest risks from exposure. No legal cases involving nanomaterial injuries have occurred so far. Continued research is needed to understand impacts and inform regulation.
Nanotechnology is rapidly changing the face of our world, broadening our view via unprecedented access to information, unique opportunities to influence our environment, and an ever growing ability to engineer materials for novel and previously unimaginable applications
The document presents a blueprint for establishing National Nanosafety Centers (NNCs). It discusses what nanosafety is and why NNCs are needed given the growth of the nanotechnology market. It outlines the methodology used to develop the blueprint, which included an online survey of 16 existing NNCs and a workshop. The results of the survey are presented on organization structure, objectives, services, knowledge dissemination, networks, and clientele of NNCs. Conclusions provide guidelines for countries looking to establish their own NNC. The document ends by discussing the need for an NNC in Colombia specifically, given its growing nanotechnology sector.
This document provides an overview of operational research. It begins with a brief history, noting that operational research originated during World War II to analyze military problems scientifically. It grew in the post-war decades and is now used widely in both public and private sectors. The document defines operational research and lists its objectives. It describes the scope, methods, and process of operational research. Applications in public health are discussed, along with composition of operational research teams and their processes. Finally, some prominent societies and journals related to operational research are mentioned.
This document provides an overview of operational research. It begins with defining operational research as the scientific study of operations to make better decisions. It then discusses the history, originating from efforts during World War II to study military problems scientifically. Methods include simulation, optimization, and data analysis. The document outlines the objectives, scope, and process of operational research. It describes the use of operational research in public health and health systems. Finally, it discusses key societies and journals in the field, such as IFORS, ORSI, and INFORMS.
Numerous government agencies and organizations are exploring how to regulate engineered nanoscale materials. This includes agencies like the National Nanotechnology Initiative, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, Food and Drug Administration, as well as international bodies like the European Union. There is growing public interest in ensuring the safe and responsible development of nanotechnology. Government efforts currently focus on funding research on health and environmental risks, developing voluntary reporting and standards, and determining if existing regulations require changes to address nanomaterials.
IPEN, NTN, RLANS: Social and Environmental Implications of Nano Development i...Yuyun Ismawati Drwiega
This informational brochure was developed to (i) provide an overview of nanotechnology development in the Asia-Pacific Region; (ii) introduce the social, environmental, and health implications of nanotechnology for workers and consumers in this region; and (iii) to stimulate and strengthen stakeholders’ participation in the global and national discussions on the actions to be implemented by governments, industry, and civil society to lay out a precautionary environment for the safe development of this technology.
Source: http://ipen.org/documents/social-and-environmental-implications-nanotechnology-development-asia-pacific
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) is the U.S. agency responsible for conducting research to prevent work-related injury and illness. NIOSH provides resources for safe nanotechnology including guidance documents, a nanoparticle information library, reference materials, training, and recommendations for further research needs such as developing methods to detect nanomaterials and characterize their properties. NIOSH also conducts field research at organizations working with nanomaterials to assess exposures, practices, and make recommendations to update their guidance.
Slides for “Taking a Proactive Approach Towards Responsibility: Indications of NanoEthics and Policy Making Around the World” Emerging Industries: Nanotechnology and NanoIndicators. Conference sponsored by the National Bureau of Economic Research and the National Science Foundation. Cambridge, MA, May 15, 2008.
This document discusses a 5 day faculty development program (FDP) on emerging trends in nanotechnology and its biomedical applications organized by the Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering at APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University. It provides an agenda for the FDP including topics on nanotoxicology, safety concerns of nanoparticles, exposure routes, material safety data sheets, personal protective equipment, safety engineering equipment, disposal of nanoparticles, and information sharing to maintain a safe research environment.
Ethical Considerations and Checklist for Affective Research with WearablesMaciej Behnke
As the popularity of wearables increases, so does their utility for studying emotions. Using new technologies points to several ethical challenges to be considered to improve research designs. There are several ethical recommendations for utilizing wearables to study human emotions, but they focus on emotion recognition systems applications rather than research design and implementation. To address this gap, we have developed a perspective on wearables, especially in daily life, adapting the ReCODE Health-Digital Health Framework and companion checklist. Therefore, our framework consists of four domains: (1) participation experience, (2) privacy, (3) data management, and (4) access and usability. We identified 33 primary risks of using wearables to study emotions, including research-related negative emotions, collecting, processing, storing, sharing personal and biological information, commercial technology validity and reliability, and exclusivity issues. We also proposed possible strategies for minimizing risks. We consulted the new ethical guidelines with members of ethics committees and relevant researchers. The judges (N = 26) positively rated our solutions and provided useful feedback that helped us refine our guidance. Finally, we summarized our proposals with a checklist for researchers' convenience. Our guidelines contribute to future research by providing improved protection of participants' and scientists' interests.
Sixteen Technology Commercialisation Projects receive S$4 million Proof-of-Co...James Chan
• 16 projects receive up to S$250,000 each in this second POC grant call,
• 2 projects came from the polytechnics
• Awarded projects are in the areas of engineering, info-comm technologies,
and life sciences.
This document provides an agenda for the Neurovation event taking place on November 24th, 2017 at Radboud University in Nijmegen, Netherlands. The event will include plenary sessions in the morning and afternoon with topics around neuroscience research. In between, there will be several breakout sessions including ones on healthy lifestyles and behavioral change, neurotechnology, brain and learning, and food and cognition. Each breakout session provides more details on the topics and speakers.
Shane Ledbetter Student ID 228604 Unit VIII White Paper NanomaterialShane Ledbetter
The document discusses occupational safety considerations for manufacturing nanomaterials. It notes that nanomaterials are increasingly used but little is known about their health effects. It recommends that companies establish effective safety management systems to assess hazards, implement controls like ventilation, and monitor exposures. Engineering controls are important to minimize hazards and protect workers. A full risk assessment including identifying sources of highest exposure and background information is needed to develop an appropriate safety plan for nanomaterial production. Worker health should be the top priority.
Operational research is the scientific study of operations aimed at improving decision-making. It originated from military planning in World War II and has since expanded to various industries. In public health, operational research uses analytical methods to identify health program problems, potential solutions, and test solutions to inform evidence-based decisions around programs. It involves interdisciplinary teams that study issues like disease screening, outbreak response, and health behavior programs. Societies like IFORS and journals promote the field. Overall, operational research integrates data analysis into program management to enhance monitoring and evaluation.
This document discusses issues and best practices for the responsible development of nanomaterials. It outlines that while occupational exposure limits (OELs) are important for preventing health effects in workers, they may need more data for nanomaterials. Alternatives to traditional OELs include provisional limits, hazard banding, and emphasizing responsible development practices. Developers and manufacturers have a responsibility to ensure safe materials and products through measures like developing hazard information, applying prudent risk management, and informing workers. Collaboration between industry, government and labor is key to promoting sustainable and safe practices.
Although nanotechnology has been recognized as an enabling technology, human and environmental exposure to nanomaterials is inevitable. As such, the need to ensure that the technology and its various applications are safe is paramount. The current concern on the risks of nanotechnology tends to specialize in the potential dangers of nanomaterials and nanoparticles. The ability to predict and mitigate potential health effects is crucial for sustainability of nanotechnology. This paper introduces the reader to safety in nanotechnology. Matthew N. O. Sadiku | Uwakwe C. Chukwu | Abayomi Ajayi-Majebi | Sarhan M. Musa "Essence of Nanosafety" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-6 | Issue-1 , December 2021, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd47873.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/other-scientific-research-area/other/47873/essence-of-nanosafety/matthew-n-o-sadiku
Industry veterans and newcomers come together at 2011 neurotech leaders forumSteve John
About 60 neurotechnology industry executives, investors, and entrepreneurs gathered in San Francisco earlier this month for the 11th annual Neurotech Leaders Forum, produced by Neurotech Reports, the publisher of this newsletter.
Nanotechnology in Consumer Products: An Update on Regulatory Responses and Li...kurfirst
The document provides an overview of regulatory developments and potential litigation related to nanotechnology in consumer products. It discusses the National Nanotechnology Initiative and efforts by agencies like EPA, FDA, and NIOSH to research and potentially regulate nanomaterials. While no human health impacts have been proven yet, some animal studies suggest risks from exposure. No legal cases involving nanomaterial injuries have occurred so far. Continued research is needed to understand impacts and inform regulation.
Nanotechnology is rapidly changing the face of our world, broadening our view via unprecedented access to information, unique opportunities to influence our environment, and an ever growing ability to engineer materials for novel and previously unimaginable applications
The document presents a blueprint for establishing National Nanosafety Centers (NNCs). It discusses what nanosafety is and why NNCs are needed given the growth of the nanotechnology market. It outlines the methodology used to develop the blueprint, which included an online survey of 16 existing NNCs and a workshop. The results of the survey are presented on organization structure, objectives, services, knowledge dissemination, networks, and clientele of NNCs. Conclusions provide guidelines for countries looking to establish their own NNC. The document ends by discussing the need for an NNC in Colombia specifically, given its growing nanotechnology sector.
This document provides an overview of operational research. It begins with a brief history, noting that operational research originated during World War II to analyze military problems scientifically. It grew in the post-war decades and is now used widely in both public and private sectors. The document defines operational research and lists its objectives. It describes the scope, methods, and process of operational research. Applications in public health are discussed, along with composition of operational research teams and their processes. Finally, some prominent societies and journals related to operational research are mentioned.
This document provides an overview of operational research. It begins with defining operational research as the scientific study of operations to make better decisions. It then discusses the history, originating from efforts during World War II to study military problems scientifically. Methods include simulation, optimization, and data analysis. The document outlines the objectives, scope, and process of operational research. It describes the use of operational research in public health and health systems. Finally, it discusses key societies and journals in the field, such as IFORS, ORSI, and INFORMS.
Numerous government agencies and organizations are exploring how to regulate engineered nanoscale materials. This includes agencies like the National Nanotechnology Initiative, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, Food and Drug Administration, as well as international bodies like the European Union. There is growing public interest in ensuring the safe and responsible development of nanotechnology. Government efforts currently focus on funding research on health and environmental risks, developing voluntary reporting and standards, and determining if existing regulations require changes to address nanomaterials.
IPEN, NTN, RLANS: Social and Environmental Implications of Nano Development i...Yuyun Ismawati Drwiega
This informational brochure was developed to (i) provide an overview of nanotechnology development in the Asia-Pacific Region; (ii) introduce the social, environmental, and health implications of nanotechnology for workers and consumers in this region; and (iii) to stimulate and strengthen stakeholders’ participation in the global and national discussions on the actions to be implemented by governments, industry, and civil society to lay out a precautionary environment for the safe development of this technology.
Source: http://ipen.org/documents/social-and-environmental-implications-nanotechnology-development-asia-pacific
1. 1
Nanotechnology:
Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
Donald H. Ewert
EHSS Services Director; Reddwall Solutions
Secretary; AIHA Nanotechnology Working Group
Industrial Hygienist
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
2. 2
“Molecular nanotechnology is the
capability to build or modify any
material object by adding or
removing individual atoms under
complete external control”
(The Future of Molecular Nanotechnology; Mike Deering)
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
3. 3
NIOSH
Filling a Critical Leadership Role
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
4. 4
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Contributions to Nanotechnology Safety & Health
- NIOSH is at the forefront of U.S. research to understand the occupational
health implications of nanomaterials.
- NIOSH offers interim guidelines for working with nanomaterials, consistent
with the best scientific knowledge.
- NIOSH provides a global online Library on nanomaterials as a working
resource for researchers and others.
- NIOSH publishes new findings and recommendations as its research
advances.
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
5. 5
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Major Programs & Initiatives
- Nanotechnology and Workplace Safety & Health Topic Page
- Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology
- Strategic Plan for NIOSH Nanotechnology Research
- Top Ten Critical Nanotechnology EHS Topic Areas
- Nanoparticle Information Library
- Progress Toward Safe Nanotechnology in the Workplace
- NIOSH Strategic Partnerships
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
6. 6
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
NIOSH is participating in an international
effort of research groups, government
agencies and industries seeking to
understand the health impact of
nanotechnology and how to control
potential risks. NIOSH is pursuing a
number of initiatives, including:
• Studying the mechanisms leading to
nanoparticle toxicity.
• Developing and testing methods to
characterize and monitor the health related
properties of nanomaterials.
• Investigating nanoparticle exposure and
ways of controlling exposure in the
workplace.
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
7. 7
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Major Programs & Initiatives
- Nanotechnology and Workplace Safety & Health Topic Page
- Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology
- Strategic Plan for NIOSH Nanotechnology Research
- Top Ten Critical Nanotechnology EHS Topic Areas
- Nanoparticle Information Library
- Progress Toward Safe Nanotechnology in the Workplace
- NIOSH Strategic Partnerships
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
8. 8
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
This document reviews what is currently
known about nanoparticle toxicity and
control, but it is only a starting point.
The document serves as a request from
NIOSH to occupational safety and
health practitioners, researchers,
product innovators and manufacturers,
employers, workers, interest group
members, and the general public to
exchange information that will ensure
that no worker suffers material
impairment of safety or health as
nanotechnology develops. Opportunities
to provide feedback and information are
available throughout this document.
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
9. 9
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Major Programs & Initiatives
- Nanotechnology and Workplace Safety & Health Topic Page
- Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology
- Strategic Plan for NIOSH Nanotechnology Research
- Top Ten Critical Nanotechnology EHS Topic Areas
- Nanoparticle Information Library
- Progress Toward Safe Nanotechnology in the Workplace
- NIOSH Strategic Partnerships
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
10. 10
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
The strategic plan provides a guide for
building a research effort capable of
responding to the challenges of this
emerging technology. It represents a
timely research agenda and will evolve
as new information becomes available
and a more thorough scientific
understanding about nanotechnology
develops. The strategic plan describes
a multi-dimensional research agenda. It
addresses what NIOSH is doing
internally and externally to lead the
occupational safety and health
community collaboratively in
nanotechnology research.
Strategic Plan for NIOSH
Nanotechnology
Research
Filling the Knowledge Gaps
September 28, 2005
Nanotechnology Research Program
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
11. 11
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
1) Understand and prevent work-related injuries and illnesses possibly
caused by nanoparticles / nanomaterials:
- To achieve this goal, there is a need to determine the toxicity of
nanomaterials, identify possible health effects from the early uses of these
materials, and monitor the on-going health of individuals working with
nanomaterials.
- Research will be conducted to develop and validate methods of exposure
assessment.
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
12. 12
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
2) Conduct research to prevent work-related injuries and illnesses by
applying nanotechnology products:
- To achieve this goal, the properties unique to nanotechnology will be used to
investigate and develop nanotechnology-based alternative solutions and
study the possible health effects of nanomaterials.
- Research will be conducted using nanomaterials, sensing and communicating
nanodevices, and nanomachinery.
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
13. 13
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
3) Promote healthy workplaces through interventions, recommendations,
and capacity building:
- To achieve this goal, there is a need to develop and evaluate engineering
controls, personal protective equipment, and guidance on safe handling of
nanomaterials. There is also a need to identify and improve safety issues in
the workplace.
- Once adequate guidance is developed, NIOSH will disseminate the
information to a broad audience and efforts will be made to incorporate it into
training programs and existing safety and health systems.
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
14. 14
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
4) Enhance global workplace safety and health through international
collaboration on nanotechnology:
- To achieve this goal, there is a need to grow existing national and
international partnerships and establish new partnerships to identify research
needs, approaches, and results to ensure the safety and health of workers.
- Solid partnerships will allow for the development and dissemination of
information and education to workers and occupational health and safety
professionals.
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
15. 15
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Major Programs & Initiatives
- Nanotechnology and Workplace Safety & Health Topic Page
- Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology
- Strategic Plan for NIOSH Nanotechnology Research
- Top Ten Critical Nanotechnology EHS Topic Areas
- Nanoparticle Information Library
- Progress Toward Safe Nanotechnology in the Workplace
- NIOSH Strategic Partnerships
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
16. 16
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
NIOSH has identified 10 critical topic
areas to guide in addressing knowledge
gaps, developing strategies, and
providing recommendations.
Each topic provides a brief description
of the research that NIOSH is
conducting in the area of
nanotechnology and the applications
and implications of nanomaterials in the
workplace.
CRITICAL
OCCUPATIONAL
SAFETY AND HEALTH
ISSUES ARISING FROM
NANOTECHNOLOGY
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
17. 17
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Toxicity and Internal Dose
- Investigating and determining the physical and chemical properties (ex: size,
shape, solubility) that influence the potential toxicity of nanoparticles
- Evaluating short and long-term effects that nanomaterials may have in organ
systems and tissues (ex: lungs)
- Determining biological mechanisms for potential toxic effects
- Creating and integrating models to assist in assessing possible hazards
- Determining if a measure other than mass is more appropriate for determining
toxicity
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
18. 18
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Risk Assessment
- Determining the likelihood that current exposure-response data (human
or animal) could be used in identifying and assessing potential
occupational hazards
- Developing a framework for evaluating potential hazards and predicting
potential occupational risk of exposure to nanomaterials.
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
19. 19
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Epidemiology & Surveillance
- Evaluating existing epidemiological workplace studies where nanomaterials
are used
- Identifying knowledge gaps where epidemiological studies could advance
understanding of nanomaterials and evaluating the likelihood of conducting
new studies
- Integrating nanotechnology health and safety issues into existing hazard
surveillance methods and determining whether additional screening methods
are needed
- Using existing systems to share data and information about nanotechnology
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
20. 20
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Engineering Controls and PPE
- Evaluating the effectiveness of engineering controls in reducing
occupational exposures to nanoaerosols and developing new controls
where needed
- Evaluating and improving current personal protective equipment
- Developing recommendations to prevent or limit occupational
exposures (ex: respirator fit testing)
- Evaluating suitability of control banding techniques where additional
information is needed; and evaluating the effectiveness of alternative
materials
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
21. 21
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Measurement Methods
- Evaluating methods of measuring mass of respirable particles in the air
and determining if this measurement can be used to measure
nanomaterials
- Developing and field-testing practical methods to accurately measure
airborne nanomaterials in the workplace
- Developing testing and evaluation systems to compare and validate
sampling instruments
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
22. 22
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Exposure Assessment
- Determining key factors that influence the production, dispersion,
accumulation, and re-entry of nanomaterials into the workplace
- Assessing possible exposure when nanomaterials are inhaled or settle on the
skin
- Determining how possible exposures differ by work process
- Determining what happens to nanomaterials once they enter the body
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
23. 23
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Fire and Explosion Safety
- Identifying physical and chemical properties that contribute to dustiness,
combustibility, flammability, and conductivity of nanomaterials.
- Recommending alternative work practices to eliminate or reduce workplace
exposures to nanoparticles.
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
24. 24
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Recommendations & Guidance
- Using the best available science to make interim recommendations for
workplace safety and health practices during the production and use of
nanomaterials
- Evaluating and updating occupational exposure limits for mass-based
airborne particles to ensure good continuing precautionary practices
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
25. 25
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Communication & Education
- Establishing partnerships to allow for identification and sharing of research
needs, approaches, and results
- Developing and disseminating training and educational materials to workers
and health and safety professionals
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
26. 26
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Applications
- Identifying uses of nanotechnology for application in occupational safety and
health
- Evaluating and disseminating effective applications to workers and
occupational safety and health professionals
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
27. 27
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Major Programs & Initiatives
- Nanotechnology and Workplace Safety & Health Topic Page
- Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology
- Strategic Plan for NIOSH Nanotechnology Research
- Top Ten Critical Nanotechnology EHS Topic Areas
- Nanoparticle Information Library
- Progress Toward Safe Nanotechnology in the Workplace
- NIOSH Strategic Partnerships
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
28. 28
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
The web-based Nanoparticle
Information Library (NIL) helps
occupational health professionals,
industrial users, worker groups, and
researchers organize and share
information on nanomaterials, including
their health and safety-associated
properties.
Nanoparticle Information Library
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
29. 29
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Nanoparticle Information Library
The information that NIOSH has incorporated into the searchable online database
includes:
- Nanomaterial composition
- Method of production
- Particle size, surface area, and morphology (included scanning, transmission,
or other electron micrographic images)
- Demonstrated or intended applications of the nanomaterial
- Availability for research or commercial applications
- Associated or relevant publications
- Points of contact for additional details or partnering
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
38. 38
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Major Programs & Initiatives
- Nanotechnology and Workplace Safety & Health Topic Page
- Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology
- Strategic Plan for NIOSH Nanotechnology Research
- Top Ten Critical Nanotechnology EHS Topic Areas
- Nanoparticle Information Library
- Progress Toward Safe Nanotechnology in the Workplace
- NIOSH Strategic Partnerships
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
39. 39
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
This document is a report of the
progress of the NIOSH Nanotechnology
Research Center (NTRC) since its
inception in 2004 through 2006. Using
only internally redirected resources, the
NTRC has begun to make contributions
to all the steps in the continuum from
hazard identification to risk
management.
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”
40. 40
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
Major Programs & Initiatives
- Nanotechnology and Workplace Safety & Health Topic Page
- Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology
- Strategic Plan for NIOSH Nanotechnology Research
- Top Ten Critical Nanotechnology EHS Topic Areas
- Nanoparticle Information Library
- Progress Toward Safe Nanotechnology in the Workplace
- NIOSH Strategic Partnerships
Reddwall Solutions
“Delivering Systems & Support”
Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety & Health
“Reviewing the State of Affairs”