Membership of the APRM is voluntary and open to all member countries of the African Union (AU).
The process of accession usually starts with a country’s expression of interest to become a member of the APRM, which is then followed by the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the country and the APRM Forum at any of the Biannual AU/APRM Summits.
The MoU was adopted in March 2003 in Abuja, Nigeria.
African peer review mechanism organisation and processDr Lendy Spires
The APRM Base document envisages four distinct organizational components and five stages of the APRM, with a number of processes both at country and continental level. Some of these critical processes include the conduct of technical assessments by the APR Partner Institutions as part of the APRM.
This paper elaborates briefly on the mandate, structure and role of each of these organizational components of the APRM. It also elaborates on the stages of the APR process that are identified in the APRM base document and presents some ideas on the funding of the APRM.
African peer review mechanism organisation and processDr Lendy Spires
The APRM Base document envisages four distinct organizational components and five stages of the APRM, with a number of processes both at country and continental level. Some of these critical processes include the conduct of technical assessments by the APR Partner Institutions as part of the APRM.
This paper elaborates briefly on the mandate, structure and role of each of these organizational components of the APRM. It also elaborates on the stages of the APR process that are identified in the APRM base document and presents some ideas on the funding of the APRM.
The base document outlines the mandate, purpose, principles, process and structure of the APRM.
It also sets out the frequency, duration and types of peer review undertaken by the APRM, as well as funding of the Secretariat.
Second Bi-Annual Progress Report - Ghana aAPRM NPoA (Jan - Jun 2007)Dr Lendy Spires
This report presents the findings and conclusions on a Monitoring and Evaluation survey of the status of implementation of Ghana’s National Program of Action. The overall purpose of the survey is to assess the extent to which various stakeholders have implemented the recommendations raised in the National Program of Action.
During the period under review, NAPRM-GC conducted a number of dissemination workshops aimed at promoting dialogue and obtaining feedback on the progress of implementation of the NPOA. The Council also used the opportunity to distribute copies of the 2006 Annual Progress Report to stakeholders.
APRM Country Review Report - South Africa 2007Dr Lendy Spires
As indicated in the report, the transformation that South Africa has undergone since its democratic transition in 1994 is nothing short of a miracle. The democratically elected governments led by the African National Congress (ANC) have managed to create a stable and peaceful plotical regime with an exemplary record of civil liberties and political freedoms. Economic policy has been conducted in an equally exemplary manner, with South Africa tunring iteself into one of the two emerging markets in Africa. The main challenge ahead consists of sustaining the momentum of the peer-review process through the successful implementation of the Programme of Action arising from the exercise. The Forum will maintain sustained interest in the implementation process and receive Annual Progess Reports thereon.
APRM Country Review Report - Sierra Leone January 2012Dr Lendy Spires
Sierra Leone acceded to the APRM on 4 July 2004, soon after the consolidation of peace and the commencement of the national reconstruction process, at the end of the ten-year civil war that engulfed the country from 1991 to 2001. This laudable achievement underlines Sierra Leone’s commitment to improving governance and sharing experiences with other African countries to prevent a repetition of war and conflict elsewhere on the Continent.
This is the Sixth Annual Progress Report submitted by the National African Peer Review Mechanism – Governing Council to the APR Panel as part of the reporting obligations of the APRM. The Report covers the period January – December 2011 and provides an overview of Ghana’s progress in the implementation of the National Programme of Action.
In the period under review the Council implemented the District APRM Governance Assessment Project in forty districts as part of efforts to improve ownership and participation of civil society actors in local governance assessments. The report of the Governance Assessment Project is available at the Council’s website.
The period under review witnessed an improved macro economic situation as a result of the government’s multi-year macro economic stabilization programme aided by positive terms of trade and favourable agricultural production.
Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol on ABS and the ITPGRFA: An AU PerspectiveBioversity International
Mahlet Teshome, African Union's presentation delivered at the Mutual Implementation of the Plant Treaty and Nagoya Protocol Workshop, November 16th, 2015, Addis Ababa
Second report on the implementation of South Africa's APRM programme of actionDr Lendy Spires
As we strive to contribute to our continent’s renewal, consistent with our national endeavours to ensure that we build state machinery that serves the interests of the people, free of corrupt practice, we have to do everything possible to ensure the success of the African Peer Review Mechanism. The report we are presenting is our second report since we went through the peer review process in July 2007, in Accra, Ghana. It will cover the period from January 2009 to September 2010, a period mostly dominated by electoral activities and formation of the fourth democratic government of South Africa.
The base document outlines the mandate, purpose, principles, process and structure of the APRM.
It also sets out the frequency, duration and types of peer review undertaken by the APRM, as well as funding of the Secretariat.
Second Bi-Annual Progress Report - Ghana aAPRM NPoA (Jan - Jun 2007)Dr Lendy Spires
This report presents the findings and conclusions on a Monitoring and Evaluation survey of the status of implementation of Ghana’s National Program of Action. The overall purpose of the survey is to assess the extent to which various stakeholders have implemented the recommendations raised in the National Program of Action.
During the period under review, NAPRM-GC conducted a number of dissemination workshops aimed at promoting dialogue and obtaining feedback on the progress of implementation of the NPOA. The Council also used the opportunity to distribute copies of the 2006 Annual Progress Report to stakeholders.
APRM Country Review Report - South Africa 2007Dr Lendy Spires
As indicated in the report, the transformation that South Africa has undergone since its democratic transition in 1994 is nothing short of a miracle. The democratically elected governments led by the African National Congress (ANC) have managed to create a stable and peaceful plotical regime with an exemplary record of civil liberties and political freedoms. Economic policy has been conducted in an equally exemplary manner, with South Africa tunring iteself into one of the two emerging markets in Africa. The main challenge ahead consists of sustaining the momentum of the peer-review process through the successful implementation of the Programme of Action arising from the exercise. The Forum will maintain sustained interest in the implementation process and receive Annual Progess Reports thereon.
APRM Country Review Report - Sierra Leone January 2012Dr Lendy Spires
Sierra Leone acceded to the APRM on 4 July 2004, soon after the consolidation of peace and the commencement of the national reconstruction process, at the end of the ten-year civil war that engulfed the country from 1991 to 2001. This laudable achievement underlines Sierra Leone’s commitment to improving governance and sharing experiences with other African countries to prevent a repetition of war and conflict elsewhere on the Continent.
This is the Sixth Annual Progress Report submitted by the National African Peer Review Mechanism – Governing Council to the APR Panel as part of the reporting obligations of the APRM. The Report covers the period January – December 2011 and provides an overview of Ghana’s progress in the implementation of the National Programme of Action.
In the period under review the Council implemented the District APRM Governance Assessment Project in forty districts as part of efforts to improve ownership and participation of civil society actors in local governance assessments. The report of the Governance Assessment Project is available at the Council’s website.
The period under review witnessed an improved macro economic situation as a result of the government’s multi-year macro economic stabilization programme aided by positive terms of trade and favourable agricultural production.
Implementation of the Nagoya Protocol on ABS and the ITPGRFA: An AU PerspectiveBioversity International
Mahlet Teshome, African Union's presentation delivered at the Mutual Implementation of the Plant Treaty and Nagoya Protocol Workshop, November 16th, 2015, Addis Ababa
Second report on the implementation of South Africa's APRM programme of actionDr Lendy Spires
As we strive to contribute to our continent’s renewal, consistent with our national endeavours to ensure that we build state machinery that serves the interests of the people, free of corrupt practice, we have to do everything possible to ensure the success of the African Peer Review Mechanism. The report we are presenting is our second report since we went through the peer review process in July 2007, in Accra, Ghana. It will cover the period from January 2009 to September 2010, a period mostly dominated by electoral activities and formation of the fourth democratic government of South Africa.
U N D P A N D S O U T H - S O U T H C O O P E R A T I O N S I N C E 1 9 9 6Dr Lendy Spires
HISTORY In response to mounting pressure for a new economic order during the 1970s, and in support of the principle of collective self-reliance among developing countries, United Nations General Assembly resolution 3251 of 4 December 1974 established a Special Unit for Technical Cooperation among Developing Countries (TCDC) within UNDP. In 1978, following a conference on TCDC, the Buenos Aires Plan of Action proposed a set of guiding principles and a plan of action for promoting and implementing TCDC, with specific recommendations for the United Nations development system. The High-Level Committee on the Review of TCDC was established in 1980 as the highest policy and oversight body under and reporting to the General Assembly.
REGIONAL DIALOGUE BETWEEN WAEMU AND ECOWAS COMMISSIONS AND NON-STATE ACTORS OF WEST AFRICA ON THE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT _17 and 18 January 2014, Dakar –Senegal
It is our pleasure to welcome readers and APRM Stakeholders to the 2011 Annual Report. 2011 was indeed a memorable year, in which the APRM recorded a number of sterling achievements in its mission to promote governance and socio-economic development in Africa.
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
Many ways to support street children.pptxSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfSaeed Al Dhaheri
This keynote was presented during the the 7th edition of the UAE Hackathon 2024. It highlights the role of AI and Generative AI in addressing government transformation to achieve zero government bureaucracy
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxPaul Smith
Given the small scale of housing associations and their relative high cost per home what is the point of them and how do we justify their continued existance
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
Effects of Extreme Temperatures From Climate Change on the Medicare Populatio...
MOU of the African Peer Review Mechanism (APRM)
1. NEPAD/HSGIC/03-2003/APRM/MOU
09 March 2003
Page 1 of 7
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON THE AFRICAN PEER
REVIEW MECHANISM
(“THE MOU”)
1. We, the Heads of State and Government of the Member States of
the African Union participating in the African Peer Review Mechanism:
2. COGNISANT of our shared commitments to the principles and
objectives set out in the Constitutive Act of the African Union adopted on
11 July 2000 in Lome, Togo;
3. RECALLING our decision regarding the then New African
Initiative, now the New Partnership for Africa’s Development, taken at the
37th
Session of the Assembly of the Heads of State and Government of the
Organisation of African Unity in July 2001 in Lusaka, Zambia
[AHG/Decl.1 (XXXVII)] adopting the Strategic Policy Framework and a
new vision for the revival and development of Africa;
4. RECALLING FURTHER our Declaration on the
Implementation of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development
[Assembly/AU/Decl. 1(I)], at the inaugural Summit of the African Union in
July 2002 in Durban, South Africa, endorsing the Progress Report and
Initial Action Plan [AHG/235 (XXXVIII)] and encouraging Member States
to adopt the New Partnership for Africa’s Development Declaration on
Democracy, Political, Economic and Corporate Governance [AHG/235
(XXXVIII) Annex I] and accede to the African Peer Review Mechanism
[AHG/235 (XXXVIII) Annex II];
5. REITERATING our commitment to the principles and core
values contained in the Declaration on Democracy, Political, Economic and
Corporate Governance;
2. NEPAD/HSGIC/03-2003/APRM/MOU
09 March 2003
Page 2 of 7
6. RECOGNISING that the mandate of the African Peer Review
Mechanism is to encourage participating States in ensuring that the policies
and practices of participating States conform to the agreed political,
economic and corporate governance values, codes and standards, and
achieve mutually agreed objectives in socio-economic development
contained in the Declaration on Democracy, Political, Economic and
Corporate Governance;
7. RECOGNISING FURTHER that the African Peer Review
Mechanism is a mutually agreed instrument voluntarily acceded to by the
Member States of the African Union as an African self-monitoring
mechanism;
8. MINDFUL that the primary purpose of the African Peer Review
Mechanism is to foster the adoption of policies, standards and practices that
lead to political stability, high economic growth, sustainable development
and accelerated sub-regional and continental economic integration through
sharing of experiences and reinforcement of successful and best practice,
including identifying deficiencies, and assessing the needs for capacity
building of participating countries;
9. NOTING WITH APPRECIATION the support of the
international community especially as expressed in the United Nations
General Assembly Declaration (A/RES/57/2) and Resolution on the New
Partnership for Africa’s Development (A/RES/57/7) affirming the United
Nations system’s support to the implementation of the New Partnership for
Africa’s Development and recommending that the New Partnership for
Africa’s Development be used as the framework for Africa’s development
by the international community, including the United Nations system and
3. NEPAD/HSGIC/03-2003/APRM/MOU
09 March 2003
Page 3 of 7
recognizing the innovative nature and importance of the African Peer
Review Mechanism;
10. WELCOMING the United Nations General Assembly
resolution on “Strengthening of the United Nations: an agenda for change”
(RES/A/57/300) wherein, amongst others, the Assembly endorses the
decision of the Secretary-General to entrust the Under-Secretary-General
and Special Advisor on Africa, who will report to him, with the
responsibilities to: (a) coordinate United Nations support to Africa, and (b)
coordinate and guide reporting on Africa, in particular support for the New
Partnership for Africa’s Development by the United Nations system and the
international community and coordinate the global advocacy in support for
the New Partnership for Africa’s Development;
11. NOTING with satisfaction the progress made by the New
Partnership for Africa’s Development Heads of State and Government
Implementation Committee in implementing the New Partnership for
Africa’s Development and in particular steps taken towards the
operationalisation of the African Peer Review Mechanism;
12. WELCOMING the initiative taken by a number of Member
States of the African Union in adopting the Declaration of Intent on the
Implementation of the African Peer Review Mechanism on 3 November
2002 in Abuja, Nigeria;
13. FULLY COMMITTED to ensuring the successful
implementation of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development in
particular the African Peer Review Mechanism including facilitating the
provision of adequate resources;
4. NEPAD/HSGIC/03-2003/APRM/MOU
09 March 2003
Page 4 of 7
14. COGNISANT of the role that the Regional Economic
Communities, as building blocks of the African Union, can play in assisting
Member States to improve their performance in governance and socio-
economic development;
15. RECOGNISING the important role that will be played in the
African Peer Review Mechanism by the Committee of Participating Heads
of State and Government (“APR Forum”), the Panel of Eminent Persons
(“APR Panel”), the Country Review Team (“APR Team”) and the African
Peer Review Secretariat (“APR Secretariat”) and Partner Institutions;
16. NOW THEREFORE being desirous to give effect to the above,
we hereby:
17. ADOPT the Declaration on Democracy, Political, Economic and
Corporate Governance [AHG/235 (XXXVIII) Annex I];
18. ACCEPT the principles of the African Peer Review Mechanism
[AHG/235 (XXXVIII) Annex II] and commit ourselves to their
implementation. To this effect, we are PREPARED to provide all
necessary resources to facilitate the processes involved at the national level,
access to all the required information and stakeholders, and to guarantee all
the appropriate privileges and immunities to the Country Review Team
(paragraph 19 of the APRM Base Document);
19. WE FURTHER AGREE TO:
20. CONTRIBUTE fully to the funding of the African Peer Review
Mechanism in order to affirm the African ownership of the Mechanism.
This includes sourcing funds from African people, businesses and
institutions;
5. NEPAD/HSGIC/03-2003/APRM/MOU
09 March 2003
Page 5 of 7
21. TAKE all necessary steps to facilitate the development and
implementation of a national Programme of Action (paragraph 13 of the
APRM Base Document) to improve our performance in the areas of
governance and socio-economic development as stipulated in the African
Peer Review Mechanism base document;
22. ENSURE the participation of all stakeholders in the
development of the national Programme of Action including trade unions,
women, youth, civil society, private sector, rural communities and
professional associations;
23. SIGN the Memorandum of Understanding on Technical
Assessments and the Country Review Visit, following consultations with
all stakeholders in our individual countries;
24. TAKE such steps as may be necessary for the implementation of
the recommendations adopted at the completion of the review process
within the specified time frame and integrate them into our respective
national Programmes of Action;
25. CO-OPERATE and ASSIST each other, as may be necessary,
by sharing best practices and strengthening our capacity to rectify identified
short-comings including requesting co-operation of external development
partners; and
26. ACCEPT that constructive peer dialogue and persuasion would
be exercised, where necessary, in order to encourage improvements in
country practices and policies in compliance with agreed African and
international best practices where recommended.
6. NEPAD/HSGIC/03-2003/APRM/MOU
09 March 2003
Page 6 of 7
GENERAL PROVISIONS
27. All procedures to be adopted under the African Peer Review
Mechanism shall be consistent with the decisions and procedures of the
African Union.
28. Any differences relating to the interpretation or implementation
of this MOU shall be resolved by negotiation between the parties
concerned.
29. The MOU may be amended at any time by mutual consent of all
participating States upon the written request by any participating State.
30. Member States of the African Union wishing to accede to the
African Peer Review Mechanism shall sign the MOU and deposit the signed
document at the NEPAD Secretariat, Midrand, South Africa.
31. The African Peer Review Mechanism shall start to be operational
on the day on which the fifth Member State of the African Union has
deposited the signed document.
32. A participating State may terminate its participation in African
Peer Review Mechanism by giving written notice to this effect to the
NEPAD Secretariat, which in turn will inform the participating States in
writing. The effective date of termination will be six months after the
receipt of the termination notice.
33. The Secretariat of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development
(NEPAD Secretariat) shall, in the interim, act as the Secretariat of the
African Peer Review Mechanism (APR Secretariat) until the latter is
established.
7. NEPAD/HSGIC/03-2003/APRM/MOU
09 March 2003
Page 7 of 7
34. The MOU shall be in Arabic, English, French and Portuguese
languages, all four being equally authentic.
35. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being duly
authorized by his or her Government, has signed the MOU.
DONE at ……………………………..on this the ………… day of
……………..of the year two thousand and three.
Signature…………………………...,
[Name]
Head of State or Government
[or duly authorized representative]
Annexures:
I) Declaration on Democracy, Political, Economic and Corporate
Governance [AHG/235(XXXVIII) Annex I]
II) African Peer Review Mechanism Base Document
[AHG/235(XXXVIII) Annex II]
End.