This civil court case involves a dispute between Paul and Lydia Mohr against Murphy Elementary School District. The case has a long history with many filings and motions, including applications for temporary restraining orders and motions to dismiss. Several hearings have been scheduled on the applications and motions to determine the next steps in the case. No judgments have been made yet as the case is still ongoing.
The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) received 51 FOIA requests in FY2004, a significant increase from 29 requests in FY2003. It processed 50 requests, with a median response time of 67 days. However, 5 complex requests took much longer, with a median time of 199 days. Exemption 5 was cited in most partial denials. CEQ spent $134,462 on FOIA processing in FY2004 but only collected $37 in fees, representing 0.02751% of total costs. The number of requests and median response time increased from the previous year.
The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Annual FOIA Report for fiscal year 2008 provides information on FOIA requests received and processed. It summarizes that CEQ received 35 requests and processed 50 total requests, with 5 pending at the end of the fiscal year. Most requests were partially granted or denied based on FOIA exemptions. CEQ also received 3 administrative appeals and processed all 3, with none pending. Exemption 5 was cited most frequently for withholding information from both requests and appeals.
The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) received 51 FOIA requests in FY2004, a significant increase from 29 requests in FY2003. It processed 50 requests, with a median response time of 67 days. However, 5 complex requests took much longer, with a median time of 199 days. Exemption 5 was cited in most partial denials. CEQ spent $134,462 on FOIA processing in FY2004 but only collected $37 in fees, representing 0.02751% of total costs. The number of requests and median response time increased from the previous year.
The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Annual FOIA Report for fiscal year 2008 provides information on FOIA requests received and processed. It summarizes that CEQ received 35 requests and processed 50 total requests, with 5 pending at the end of the fiscal year. Most requests were partially granted or denied based on FOIA exemptions. CEQ also received 3 administrative appeals and processed all 3, with none pending. Exemption 5 was cited most frequently for withholding information from both requests and appeals.
The document discusses issues with the management of the Murphy School District. It notes that the school superintendent was arrested for shoplifting wine despite making over $100,000 per year. It questions how someone who cannot properly manage their own finances can manage a multi-million dollar school budget. Poor financial management has led to underperforming schools that fail to provide students with high-quality teachers and make adequate yearly progress. Drastic changes are needed to improve the school system and ensure students receive the education they deserve.
Legal expenses so far total $175,000, which is equivalent to the salaries of 6 teachers or 3 school administrators. Alternatively, that money could have purchased laptops for every teacher, 2 new school buses, or 8 copy machines. The document discusses using $175,000 in legal fees to instead fund education resources and implies the fees were due to unethical behavior.
This letter thanks a Facebook fan page for keeping people informed and recommends that the fan page ask Patsy to email the board agenda and tell Jason to post the agenda online before meetings to improve communication and protect the environment, as the writer missed the last board meeting due to lack of communication.
"Fundamental to our way of life is the belief that when information which properly belongs to the public is systematically withheld by those in power, the people soon become ignorant of their own affairs, distrustful of those who manage them, and---eventually-incapable of determining their own destinies." Richard Nixon
The Way Murphy Governing Board voted on an unspecified issue, with Raymond M. Rodriguez, Theresa M. Grimes, William E. Grimes and Teri Swanson voting yes, and Arthur V. Murillo voting no.
If the author became the superintendent of the Murphy School District, they would: reduce district administration, hire highly qualified administrators and teachers with starting salaries over $40,000, eliminate retirees collecting double pay and unproductive staff, open one charter school, keep schools open until 6pm, build learning communities and partnerships, and cut their own salary in half.
1) The parties submitted a joint status report in accordance with local bankruptcy rules regarding an adversary proceeding between Virgie Arthur and Bonnie Gayle Stern.
2) Discovery is ongoing, with the plaintiff anticipating completion in 8-10 months, while the defendant believes discovery could be completed sooner in 3 months if permitted.
3) The plaintiff estimates needing 10-14 days to present their case at trial plus rebuttal, while the defendant anticipates needing 2 days, with the plaintiff intending to call approximately 12 witnesses and the defendant 3-4 witnesses.
Motion for Leave To Amend And Add Known Jane DoesJRachelle
This document is a motion filed by Howard K. Stern as executor of the estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall (Anna Nicole Smith) in a civil action. It requests leave from the court to amend and supplement the original complaint, join additional defendants, and amend the case caption. The motion states that discovery has revealed new information supporting the original claims and identifying previously unknown defendants. It also describes events that have occurred since the original complaint that could be added. The executor seeks to add claims involving additional conversions of estate property and to join new parties involved in the unauthorized transfers.
This document is an order from a bankruptcy court case staying an adversary proceeding pending resolution of a related state court case. The order schedules a continued status conference in the bankruptcy court for October 6, 2009 and every 90 days thereafter until judgments on liability and damages are issued in the state court case, or until further court order. The parties must submit a joint status report 14 days before each conference.
The mediator filed a report stating that the parties engaged in court-ordered mediation on November 1, 2011, but the mediation resulted in an impasse with no resolution. The mediator certified that he served copies of the report by hand delivery to both the plaintiff and counsel for the defendants on November 1, 2011.
The mediator filed a report stating that the parties engaged in court-ordered mediation on November 1, 2011, but the mediation resulted in an impasse with no resolution. The mediator certified that he served copies of the report by hand delivery to both the plaintiff and counsel for the defendants on November 1, 2011.
The mediator filed a report stating that the parties engaged in court-ordered mediation on November 1, 2011, but the mediation resulted in an impasse with no resolution. The mediator certified that he served copies of the report by hand delivery to both the plaintiff and counsel for the defendants on November 1, 2011.
The mediator filed a report stating that the parties engaged in court-ordered mediation on November 1, 2011, but the mediation resulted in an impasse with no resolution. The mediator certified that he served copies of the report by hand delivery to both the plaintiff and counsel for the defendants on November 1, 2011.
This document is a motion filed by Howard K. Stern as executor of Anna Nicole Smith's estate. It seeks to hold the defendant G. Ben Thompson and his attorney Susan Brown in contempt of court for violating a court order. The order required Brown to turn over duplicates of estate property within 10 days, but she failed to do so for over 9 months. The motion requests sanctions against Thompson and Brown, including striking defenses, awarding legal fees, and ordering the immediate turnover of all estate property.
Scott Joye Motion For Joinder To Brown Response to Motion for SanctionsJRachelle
This document is a motion filed in a civil case in the United States District Court for South Carolina. The motion requests that the defendant G. Ben Thompson be allowed to join the response filed by another defendant, Susan M. Brown, to a motion for sanctions filed by the plaintiff. The motion states that the allegations in the plaintiff's motion for sanctions are the same against both defendants. The attorney for G. Ben Thompson asks to adopt the answer filed by Susan M. Brown in response to the motion for sanctions.
Brown reply memo support motion to dismissJRachelle
This document is the Brown Defendants' reply memorandum in support of their motion to dismiss portions of Howard Stern's amended complaint. It argues that the motion to dismiss is not precluded by the court's prior ruling allowing the amended complaint. It also argues that California procedural law, including its probate code and publicity rights statute, does not apply in this South Carolina district court case. Finally, it asserts that the publicity rights statute is not applicable to the Brown Defendants' alleged actions of providing materials to another law firm.
Brown Opposition To Plaintiff Motion To Amend ComplaintJRachelle
This document is a memorandum filed by Susan M. Brown and the Law Offices of Susan M. Brown in opposition to Howard K. Stern's motion to amend his complaint to join them as additional defendants. The memorandum argues that the motion to amend should be denied on the grounds of prejudice and futility. It asserts that Brown would be prejudiced by the late addition as a defendant since discovery is largely complete. It also argues that the attempts to apply California law are futile since South Carolina law applies, and that the complaint fails to properly plead causes of action under South Carolina law against Brown.
The document discusses assessing communication tools on a school district website. It finds that the site needs more frequent updates, collaboration, and participatory features. In particular, the superintendent's blog has not been updated since the beginning of the school year. It also notes that agenda and meeting minutes are not available online, communication and collaboration are not valued across the community, and the district's communication system scores far below standards. It calls for schools to use new technologies and tools to share information openly with the public.
The administration claims there is no budget for salaries, supplies, textbooks, field trips, or substitute teachers. However, there is money to rehire 14 retired employees costing $1 million per year. There is also money for board meeting buffets and consultants. Substitute principals are paid $300 per day, but it is unclear if they are certified or fingerprinted. One substitute principal is related to the board secretary, representing a conflict of interest and likely policy violation. The conclusion is that the Murphy administration's spending priorities and lack of transparency have not changed.
The document discusses issues with the management of the Murphy School District. It notes that the school superintendent was arrested for shoplifting wine despite making over $100,000 per year. It questions how someone who cannot properly manage their own finances can manage a multi-million dollar school budget. Poor financial management has led to underperforming schools that fail to provide students with high-quality teachers and make adequate yearly progress. Drastic changes are needed to improve the school system and ensure students receive the education they deserve.
Legal expenses so far total $175,000, which is equivalent to the salaries of 6 teachers or 3 school administrators. Alternatively, that money could have purchased laptops for every teacher, 2 new school buses, or 8 copy machines. The document discusses using $175,000 in legal fees to instead fund education resources and implies the fees were due to unethical behavior.
This letter thanks a Facebook fan page for keeping people informed and recommends that the fan page ask Patsy to email the board agenda and tell Jason to post the agenda online before meetings to improve communication and protect the environment, as the writer missed the last board meeting due to lack of communication.
"Fundamental to our way of life is the belief that when information which properly belongs to the public is systematically withheld by those in power, the people soon become ignorant of their own affairs, distrustful of those who manage them, and---eventually-incapable of determining their own destinies." Richard Nixon
The Way Murphy Governing Board voted on an unspecified issue, with Raymond M. Rodriguez, Theresa M. Grimes, William E. Grimes and Teri Swanson voting yes, and Arthur V. Murillo voting no.
If the author became the superintendent of the Murphy School District, they would: reduce district administration, hire highly qualified administrators and teachers with starting salaries over $40,000, eliminate retirees collecting double pay and unproductive staff, open one charter school, keep schools open until 6pm, build learning communities and partnerships, and cut their own salary in half.
1) The parties submitted a joint status report in accordance with local bankruptcy rules regarding an adversary proceeding between Virgie Arthur and Bonnie Gayle Stern.
2) Discovery is ongoing, with the plaintiff anticipating completion in 8-10 months, while the defendant believes discovery could be completed sooner in 3 months if permitted.
3) The plaintiff estimates needing 10-14 days to present their case at trial plus rebuttal, while the defendant anticipates needing 2 days, with the plaintiff intending to call approximately 12 witnesses and the defendant 3-4 witnesses.
Motion for Leave To Amend And Add Known Jane DoesJRachelle
This document is a motion filed by Howard K. Stern as executor of the estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall (Anna Nicole Smith) in a civil action. It requests leave from the court to amend and supplement the original complaint, join additional defendants, and amend the case caption. The motion states that discovery has revealed new information supporting the original claims and identifying previously unknown defendants. It also describes events that have occurred since the original complaint that could be added. The executor seeks to add claims involving additional conversions of estate property and to join new parties involved in the unauthorized transfers.
This document is an order from a bankruptcy court case staying an adversary proceeding pending resolution of a related state court case. The order schedules a continued status conference in the bankruptcy court for October 6, 2009 and every 90 days thereafter until judgments on liability and damages are issued in the state court case, or until further court order. The parties must submit a joint status report 14 days before each conference.
The mediator filed a report stating that the parties engaged in court-ordered mediation on November 1, 2011, but the mediation resulted in an impasse with no resolution. The mediator certified that he served copies of the report by hand delivery to both the plaintiff and counsel for the defendants on November 1, 2011.
The mediator filed a report stating that the parties engaged in court-ordered mediation on November 1, 2011, but the mediation resulted in an impasse with no resolution. The mediator certified that he served copies of the report by hand delivery to both the plaintiff and counsel for the defendants on November 1, 2011.
The mediator filed a report stating that the parties engaged in court-ordered mediation on November 1, 2011, but the mediation resulted in an impasse with no resolution. The mediator certified that he served copies of the report by hand delivery to both the plaintiff and counsel for the defendants on November 1, 2011.
The mediator filed a report stating that the parties engaged in court-ordered mediation on November 1, 2011, but the mediation resulted in an impasse with no resolution. The mediator certified that he served copies of the report by hand delivery to both the plaintiff and counsel for the defendants on November 1, 2011.
This document is a motion filed by Howard K. Stern as executor of Anna Nicole Smith's estate. It seeks to hold the defendant G. Ben Thompson and his attorney Susan Brown in contempt of court for violating a court order. The order required Brown to turn over duplicates of estate property within 10 days, but she failed to do so for over 9 months. The motion requests sanctions against Thompson and Brown, including striking defenses, awarding legal fees, and ordering the immediate turnover of all estate property.
Scott Joye Motion For Joinder To Brown Response to Motion for SanctionsJRachelle
This document is a motion filed in a civil case in the United States District Court for South Carolina. The motion requests that the defendant G. Ben Thompson be allowed to join the response filed by another defendant, Susan M. Brown, to a motion for sanctions filed by the plaintiff. The motion states that the allegations in the plaintiff's motion for sanctions are the same against both defendants. The attorney for G. Ben Thompson asks to adopt the answer filed by Susan M. Brown in response to the motion for sanctions.
Brown reply memo support motion to dismissJRachelle
This document is the Brown Defendants' reply memorandum in support of their motion to dismiss portions of Howard Stern's amended complaint. It argues that the motion to dismiss is not precluded by the court's prior ruling allowing the amended complaint. It also argues that California procedural law, including its probate code and publicity rights statute, does not apply in this South Carolina district court case. Finally, it asserts that the publicity rights statute is not applicable to the Brown Defendants' alleged actions of providing materials to another law firm.
Brown Opposition To Plaintiff Motion To Amend ComplaintJRachelle
This document is a memorandum filed by Susan M. Brown and the Law Offices of Susan M. Brown in opposition to Howard K. Stern's motion to amend his complaint to join them as additional defendants. The memorandum argues that the motion to amend should be denied on the grounds of prejudice and futility. It asserts that Brown would be prejudiced by the late addition as a defendant since discovery is largely complete. It also argues that the attempts to apply California law are futile since South Carolina law applies, and that the complaint fails to properly plead causes of action under South Carolina law against Brown.
Similar to Mohr vs Murphy Civil Court Case Information Case History (11)
The document discusses assessing communication tools on a school district website. It finds that the site needs more frequent updates, collaboration, and participatory features. In particular, the superintendent's blog has not been updated since the beginning of the school year. It also notes that agenda and meeting minutes are not available online, communication and collaboration are not valued across the community, and the district's communication system scores far below standards. It calls for schools to use new technologies and tools to share information openly with the public.
The administration claims there is no budget for salaries, supplies, textbooks, field trips, or substitute teachers. However, there is money to rehire 14 retired employees costing $1 million per year. There is also money for board meeting buffets and consultants. Substitute principals are paid $300 per day, but it is unclear if they are certified or fingerprinted. One substitute principal is related to the board secretary, representing a conflict of interest and likely policy violation. The conclusion is that the Murphy administration's spending priorities and lack of transparency have not changed.
A school district maintains a Facebook page to share updates and information with the community. The page averages 50-60 visits per day and has seen visits increase to over 1900 per month. The district encourages residents to support the page by becoming a fan and telling others in order to further engage the community.
The document discusses using Facebook to increase transparency and public participation in education governance. It proposes that school superintendents could use Facebook to pose questions to the public about policy issues, collect feedback, analyze the information, and present recommendations to the school board. The board would then approve or disapprove based on the input received through Facebook. This process aims to make schools more accountable to their communities and think more independently.
Juan Bobo writes a letter to teachers at Murphy School expressing concerns about teachers' fear of strength and domination that prevents excellence. He encourages teachers to organize among themselves, parents, and students to empower themselves and remove fear and isolation. Juan warns that if teachers fail to act, they may lose him as a student and potentially their jobs.
The Murphy School District is seeking public input on next year's operating budget during a budget crisis through Facebook or confidential email due to district employees refraining from commenting on Facebook. Residents are asked to share their opinions, insights, concerns and perspectives to help the district with ideas for the future of the Murphy community and budget rather than focus on past mistakes.
Open Letter to the Murphy Governing Board (Revised)msdaz
The Office of the Auditor General conducted an audit of the Murphy Elementary School District and found that administrative costs were significantly higher than comparable districts due to extra administrative positions. Since then, the student population has decreased by 500 students under Dr. Mohr's administration, as he did not reduce administrative costs. Current administrators have announced cuts but have not followed through, as evidenced by replacing instructional positions over others. Teachers have less impact on students than classroom teachers. The community believes merging Murphy Schools with other districts will create more competent schools with a sense of community and equal education for all students.
This civil court case from 2009 involves plaintiffs Paul and Lydia Mohr against Murphy Elementary School District and several individuals. The case has a long history with numerous filings, including amended complaints, motions, responses, replies, and applications for temporary restraining orders. The filings indicate motions to dismiss claims, reconsider rulings, and modify court orders regarding the stay of an administrative termination hearing for one or more of the defendants.
The document discusses a proposal to provide an incentive stipend to school administrators through Title II-A grant funds. The stipend would encourage administrators to work at high-needs, inner-city schools in order to promote student achievement. Currently, teachers receive stipends for student achievement but administrators do not. The federal government has approved a similar incentive stipend based on whether a school meets Adequate Yearly Progress targets. The proposed stipend would make it equitable for all administrators to receive the payment regardless of school population size, as it would be based solely on student achievement. Stakeholders are being asked to consider approving the stipend proposal.
The document envisions a school district that is responsive to students and parents, a district that the entire community is proud for their children to attend, and a district that is attentive to both students and parents.
The document is a report card on the efforts of the MSD district to address an issue. It summarizes that MSD used various communication tools regularly to facilitate two-way communication between home and school. MSD also established opportunities for parents and staff to share information, involved teachers in meaningful collaboration, and provided clear information to parents and the community about the issue. MSD took steps to accommodate language barriers and schedules in addressing the community.
The document is a message to a school district governing board expressing concern over the superintendent, Dr. Mohr. The employee was disappointed to learn of Dr. Mohr's actions and feels he is no longer a suitable leader and role model for students. Specifically, the employee is worried about upholding double standards if Dr. Mohr faces no consequences, as many teachers were previously let go for not meeting credentials. The employee believes all professionals should be held to the same standards of conduct regardless of their role.
This document calls for the resignation of Dr. Paul B. Mohr Jr., the superintendent of schools in Phoenix, Arizona. It accuses him and some members of his administrative team of oppressing the local community through manipulation, repression, and ignoring the rights of parents. The document cites the failure of several schools in the area to provide a quality education to students, despite policies aimed at school accountability, and argues innovative solutions can help improve outcomes for inner-city youth regardless of their background.
The simplified electron and muon model, Oscillating Spacetime: The Foundation...RitikBhardwaj56
Discover the Simplified Electron and Muon Model: A New Wave-Based Approach to Understanding Particles delves into a groundbreaking theory that presents electrons and muons as rotating soliton waves within oscillating spacetime. Geared towards students, researchers, and science buffs, this book breaks down complex ideas into simple explanations. It covers topics such as electron waves, temporal dynamics, and the implications of this model on particle physics. With clear illustrations and easy-to-follow explanations, readers will gain a new outlook on the universe's fundamental nature.
Main Java[All of the Base Concepts}.docxadhitya5119
This is part 1 of my Java Learning Journey. This Contains Custom methods, classes, constructors, packages, multithreading , try- catch block, finally block and more.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
How to Add Chatter in the odoo 17 ERP ModuleCeline George
In Odoo, the chatter is like a chat tool that helps you work together on records. You can leave notes and track things, making it easier to talk with your team and partners. Inside chatter, all communication history, activity, and changes will be displayed.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Mohr vs Murphy Civil Court Case Information Case History
1. Civil Court Case Information - Case History
Home Superior Court Justice Courts Adult Probation Español Locations Links
Juvenile Probation Employment
Docket > Civil Court Cases
Search: Civil Court Case Information - Case History
Go
Case Information
Docket Home Case CV2009-035970 Judge: Garcia, Jeanne
Number:
Civil Cases
File Date: 11/9/2009 Location: Downtown
Criminal Cases Case Type: Civil
Family Court Cases
Probate Cases Party Information
Party Name Relationship Sex Attorney
Justice Court Cases
Paul B Mohr Plaintiff Male Gary Lassen
Retention Rules
Lydia Bustamante-Mohr Plaintiff Female Gary Lassen
Murphy Elementary School District 21 Of Maricopa County Defendant David Garner
William E Grimes Defendant Male David Garner
Theresa M Grimes Defendant Female David Garner
Teri Swanson Defendant Female David Garner
Case Documents
Filing Date Description Docket Date Filing Party
1/14/2010 AMC - Amended Complaint 1/14/2010
NOTE: First Amended Verified Complaint
1/12/2010 MOT - Motion 1/12/2010
NOTE: Motion to Vacate Hearing on Termporary Restraining Order
1/11/2010 029 - ME: Status Conference 1/11/2010
1/8/2010 MOT - Motion 1/10/2010
NOTE: Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply TO MOTION FOR EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO RECONSIDER ORAL RULING
RE SECOND APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO STRIKE
1/7/2010 REL - Reply 1/8/2010
NOTE: Reply in Support of Motion for Expedited Consideration of Motion to Reconsider Oral Ruling re Second Application for Temporary
Restraining Order
1/6/2010 RES - Response 1/6/2010
NOTE: Response to Motion for Expedited Consideration of Motion to Reconsider Oral Ruling Re: Second Application for Temporary
Restraining Order
1/4/2010 REL - Reply 1/5/2010
NOTE: Defendants Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss
1/4/2010 MOT - Motion 1/5/2010
NOTE: Motion to Expedite Consideration of Motion to Reconsider Oral Ruling re Second Application for Temporary Restraining Order
1/4/2010 MFR - Motion For Reconsideration 1/5/2010
NOTE: Expedited Motion to Reconsider Oral Ruling re Second Application for Temporary Restraining Order
1/4/2010 NOF - Notice Of Filing 1/5/2010
NOTE: Notice of Filing Exhibit to Defendants Expedited Motion to Reconsider Oral Ruling re Second Application for Temporary Restraining
Order
1/3/2010 REL - Reply 1/4/2010
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CivilCourtCases/caseInfo.asp[1/16/2010 10:13:11 PM]
2. Civil Court Case Information - Case History
NOTE: Reply in Support of Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction and Order to Show Cause
12/31/2009 APL - Application 1/4/2010
NOTE: Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction and Order to Show Cause
12/31/2009 OBJ - Objection/Opposition. 1/4/2010
NOTE: Defendants Opposition to Plaintiffs Second Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction and Order to Show
Cause
12/31/2009 NOF - Notice Of Filing 1/4/2010
NOTE: Notice of Filing Exhibits to Defendants Opposition to Plaintiffs Second Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary
Injunction and Order to Show Cause
12/21/2009 NOT - Notice 12/22/2009
NOTE: Notice of Association of Counsel
12/21/2009 MOT - Motion 12/22/2009
NOTE: Motion to Reconsider Order Denying Stay of Termination Hearing
12/21/2009 MOT - Motion 12/22/2009
NOTE: Motion for Expedited Consideration of Districts Motion to Dismiss, Dr. Mohrs Motion to Strike, and Dr. Mohrs Motion for
Reconsideration
12/21/2009 RES - Response 12/22/2009
NOTE: Response to Motion to Dismiss
12/14/2009 005 - ME: Hearing 12/14/2009
12/10/2009 530 - ME: Case Designated for Mandatory E-Filing 12/10/2009
12/8/2009 REL - Reply 12/8/2009
NOTE: Reply to Expedited Motion to Modify Order Granting Stay Relief in Administrative Proceedings
12/7/2009 RES - Response 12/8/2009
NOTE: PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO EXPEDITED MOTION TO MODIFY ORDER; PLAINTIFF’S EXPEDITED MOTION TO MODIFY ORDER
AND REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SEEKING ENFORCEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT; MOTION TO STRIKE
DEFENDANTS PLEADINGS BASED ON VIOLATIONS OF LAW AND REQUEST FOR INTERIM AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES.
12/3/2009 MOT - Motion 12/4/2009
NOTE: Expedited Motion to Modify Order Granting Stay Relief in Administrative Proceedings
12/3/2009 MOT - Motion 12/4/2009
NOTE: Motion to Expedite Consideration of Motion to Modify Order Granting Stay Relief in Administrative Proceedings
12/2/2009 005 - ME: Hearing 12/2/2009
12/1/2009 005 - ME: Hearing 12/1/2009
11/30/2009 MTD - Motion To Dismiss 12/1/2009
NOTE: Defendants Motion to Dismiss
11/25/2009 REL - Reply 11/27/2009
NOTE: Defendants Sur-Reply to Plaintiffs Application for Temporary Restraining order and Request for Injunctive Relief Seeking Enforcement
of Settlement Agreement - Filing fee paid on receipt #20197205
11/19/2009 REL - Reply 11/20/2009
NOTE: Plaintiffs Reply Memorandum in Support of Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Request for Injunctive Relief Seeking
Enforcement of Settlement Agreement
11/16/2009 087 - ME: Order To Show Cause Issued 11/16/2009
11/13/2009 OBJ - Objection/Opposition. 11/19/2009
NOTE: TO PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SEEKING
ENFORCEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
11/12/2009 AFS - Affidavit Of Service 11/20/2009
NOTE: WILLIAM E GRIMES 11/09/09
11/12/2009 AFS - Affidavit Of Service 11/20/2009
http://www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov/docket/CivilCourtCases/caseInfo.asp[1/16/2010 10:13:11 PM]