Geotechnical Properties of Lateritic Soils from Northern Zone of Anambra Stat...IJERD Editor
This investigation was carried out to determine the geotechnical properties of lateritic soils used for
road construction in Obosi, Umunya, Awkuzu, and Igbariam towns, all in Northern Zone of Anambra state of
Nigeria. Tests were carried out on the soil samples which include the Atterberg limit tests, particle size
distribution analysis, specific gravity, compaction test using the British Standard Light (BSL), Compactive
effort and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test as specified by the West African Standard (WAS). The liquid
limits, plastic limits and plasticity indices guided in the classification of the soil samples as A-2-4 soil of
American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) classification and SC group
of Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The compaction characteristics of the soil were found to be
1931KN/m3, 2003.8KN/m3, 1965KN/m3 and 1923KN/m3 for maximum dry density and 10.8%, 9.4%, 10.4%
and 12.20% for optimum moisture content for samples 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The California bearing ratio
(CBR) results for the samples for 24 hours soaking are 48%, 58%, 45%, and 52% for sample 1, 2, 3, and 4
respectively. It was concluded that the four lateritic soil samples were suitable for sub-grade and sub-base but
should not be used in road construction as a base material.
Installation of an Impervious Cap for Control of Residual NAPL Migration, Con...TRC Companies, Inc.
TRC's John Rice and Katherine Vater are co-authors of this presentation about the construction issues and solutions related to the installation of an impervious NAPL cap at a former manufactured gas plant (MGP).
Design of a Remedy to Control NAPL Transport and Allow for Flexible Redevelop...TRC Companies, Inc.
TRC engineer and scientist John Rice highlights TRC’s patented sediment capping technologies that address NAPL-containing sediment and bank soils at former manufactured gas plant (MGP) sites. The presentation was part of the Fifth International Symposium & Exhibition on the Redevelopment of Manufactured Gas Plant Sites (MGP 2014) .
Geotechnical Properties of Lateritic Soils from Northern Zone of Anambra Stat...IJERD Editor
This investigation was carried out to determine the geotechnical properties of lateritic soils used for
road construction in Obosi, Umunya, Awkuzu, and Igbariam towns, all in Northern Zone of Anambra state of
Nigeria. Tests were carried out on the soil samples which include the Atterberg limit tests, particle size
distribution analysis, specific gravity, compaction test using the British Standard Light (BSL), Compactive
effort and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test as specified by the West African Standard (WAS). The liquid
limits, plastic limits and plasticity indices guided in the classification of the soil samples as A-2-4 soil of
American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) classification and SC group
of Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). The compaction characteristics of the soil were found to be
1931KN/m3, 2003.8KN/m3, 1965KN/m3 and 1923KN/m3 for maximum dry density and 10.8%, 9.4%, 10.4%
and 12.20% for optimum moisture content for samples 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The California bearing ratio
(CBR) results for the samples for 24 hours soaking are 48%, 58%, 45%, and 52% for sample 1, 2, 3, and 4
respectively. It was concluded that the four lateritic soil samples were suitable for sub-grade and sub-base but
should not be used in road construction as a base material.
Installation of an Impervious Cap for Control of Residual NAPL Migration, Con...TRC Companies, Inc.
TRC's John Rice and Katherine Vater are co-authors of this presentation about the construction issues and solutions related to the installation of an impervious NAPL cap at a former manufactured gas plant (MGP).
Design of a Remedy to Control NAPL Transport and Allow for Flexible Redevelop...TRC Companies, Inc.
TRC engineer and scientist John Rice highlights TRC’s patented sediment capping technologies that address NAPL-containing sediment and bank soils at former manufactured gas plant (MGP) sites. The presentation was part of the Fifth International Symposium & Exhibition on the Redevelopment of Manufactured Gas Plant Sites (MGP 2014) .
Navy Co-Chair Updates
Restoration Advisory Board
Former NAS Moffett Field
January 14, 2010
Kathryn Stewart, BRAC Environmental Coordinator
BRAC Program Management Office West
This presentation by Robert Strauch of Fire and Rescue NSW discusses how using fire as a restoration tool requires a considerable amount of dedicated planning and resourcing from Firefighting Authorities, so how do we do it?
Presentation from Nature Conservation Council of NSW 2015 Bushfire Conference - Fire and Restoration: working with fire for healthy lands.
Navy Co-Chair Updates
Restoration Advisory Board
Former NAS Moffett Field
November 12, 2009
Kathryn Stewart, BRAC Environmental Coordinator
BRAC Program Management Office West
Turning the Tide: Reviving the Estuary: Science, Politics, and EducationCUNY Sustainable Cities
Session 4 Wed. April 28, 2010
Reviving the Estuary: Science, Politics, and Education
Moderator: Dr. John Waldman, Queens College
Speakers/Panelists
Deborah A. Mans, Executive Director, NY/NJ Baykeeper
Christopher J. Collins, Executive Director, Solar One
Cortney Worrall, Director of Programs, Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance
Murray Fisher, Urban Assembly New York Harbor School
William Kor
Moffett RAB: EPA MEW Superfund Study Area UpdateSteve Williams
EPA Status Update
Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman (MEW) Superfund Study Area
Mountain View and Moffett Field, CA
Presentation to Former NAS Moffett Field Restoration Advisory Board
August 13, 2015
Alana Lee, EPA
Moffett RAB: EPA Update on Environmental Issues Management PlanSteve Williams
Update on Environmental Issues Management Plan (EIMP)
Presentation to the Former NAS Moffett Field RAB Meeting
August 13, 2015
By Alana Lee, EPA
Elizabeth Wells, Water Board
EPA MEW Study Area TCE Source InvestigationSteve Williams
EPA TCE Source Investigation Findings
Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman (MEW)
Superfund Study Area
Mountain View and Moffett Field, CA
Former NAS Moffett Field
Restoration Advisory Board Meeting
February 12, 2015
Moffett Site 1, 22, 26, and 28 Five Year ReviewSteve Williams
Five Year Review for Installation Restoration Sites 1, 22, 26 and 28, Former Naval Air Station Moffett Field: Presentation to the Moffett Restoration Advisory Board Meeting, February 12, 2015, by Wilson Doctor, Navy Project Manager
Orion Park Housing Area VOC Plume AssessmentSteve Williams
Presentation by the Army Environmental Command to the Moffett Field Restoration Advisory Board, November 20, 2014: Orion Park Housing Area Volatile Organic Compound Plume Assessment. Speaker: Matt Dayoc
EPA MEW Sampling Update, Moffett RAB, November 14, 2013Steve Williams
EPA update to the Moffett Restoration Advisory Board November 14, 2013, describing the investigation of TCE hotspots near Evandale Avenue, Leong Drive, and the Gateway Property (former County Vector Control Yard) adjacent to the MEW Superfund site in Mountain View, CA.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
1. Hangar 1 Navy Update
Restoration Advisory Board
Former NAS Moffett Field
May 13, 2010
Kathryn Stewart, PE
BRAC Environmental Coordinator
BRAC Program Management Office West
1
2. Background – Former NAS Moffett Field
• Commissioned in 1933
• Recommended for closure
in 1991
• Transfer to NASA in 1994
– 1992 MOU
• Navy responsible for
environmental restoration
Navy Photo
2
3. Hangar 1
• Built in 1932 to house
airship U.S.S. Macon
• 1,133 ft long, 308 ft wide,
198 ft high
• Contributing element to
NAS Sunnyvale, CA Historic
District
Navy Photos • Individually eligible for
National Register
• Designated a “Navy historic
site”
• Civil Engineering Landmark
of Northern CA
3
4. Chronology
• 1997- PCB contamination
discovered in sediment
• Subsequently found in
stormwater samples
• Determined a source was
Hangar 1 in 2002
• Need to address source
Navy Photos
4
5. Chronology
• PCBs and asbestos within
metal siding
• Metal siding and interior
structure also painted with
paint containing lead and
PCBs
• Hangar closed for use in
2002
Navy Photo
5
6. Cleanup Chronology
• Identified as a CERCLA site,
IR Site 29, in 2003
• Time Critical Removal
Actions conducted in 2003
– Cleaned out storm drain
sediments
– Coated hangar with asphalt
emulsion
• Proceeded with Non-Time
Critical Removal Action in
Navy Photo
2005
6
7. Engineering Evaluation/
Cost Analysis (EE/CA)
• EE/CA drafted in May 2006
– Recommended demolition
• Public Meeting – Late May
2006
• Structural Analysis and
Seismic, Wind, and Gravity
Study (July 2008)
• Revised EE/CA – July 2008
• Public Meetings- Aug & Sep Source: Moffett Users Website, www.nuqu.org
2008
7
8. Action Memorandum
• Action Memorandum –
December 2008
• Selected Alternative 10
– Remove siding and
coat exposed surfaces
• Contract awarded 25
September 2009
– $22.3M
8
9. Schedule
• Work Plan approval Spring 2010
• Start interior abatement/demolition Late Spring 2010
• Start siding removal Winter 2010
• Complete siding removal and coating Fall 2011
• Complete confirmation sampling Fall 2011
• Submit final report Winter 2012
9
10. Other Considerations: Historic
• National Historic Preservation Act
– Section 106
• Coordination with Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
(ACHP) and State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
• Removal Action Mitigation Measures
– HAER documentation
– Interactive CDs, Oral Histories
– Preservation of Man Crane, etc.
– Does not include re-siding
• Two undertakings
– Navy’s Removal Action
– NASA’s Reuse
Navy Photo
10
11. Other Considerations: Residing
• OMB Arbitration concluded March 2010
– Navy - environmental cleanup actions
– NASA - Hangar 1 reuse and residing
• Navy and NASA working together to determine the most
appropriate path forward
• Investigating options for coordination
• Recent Discussions – 27 April 2010
• Recent Navy Correspondence
– To determine feasibility of combining under one contract, need
plans, specs, funding
– Requirement for cleaning prior to new construction
– Cannot delay removal action - interim coating showing signs of
failure
– Lack of immediate plan not detrimental to Hangar frame
11
12. Other Considerations:
Deterioration/Birds
• Deterioration-
– Structure in sound
condition
– Coating service life of 20+
years
– Proven at Vandenberg
launch tower
– Routine inspection and
maintenance
• Roosting nest/bird air strike
hazard-
Photo of Hangar 1 Construction
– BASH Mitigation
– Temporary and permanent
12
14. Other Considerations: Items for Decon
• Navy allotted $75K in
contract for decon of items
identified by NASA
• List submitted by NASA and
reviewed by contractor
• Includes various types of
items
14
15. Contact Information
Kathy Stewart
BRAC Environmental Coordinator
BRAC Program Management Office West
Navy Caretaker Site Office
1 Avenue of the Palms, Suite 161
Treasure Island
San Francisco, CA 94130-1807
Phone: (415)743-4715
Fax: (415)743-4700
E-mail: Kathryn.Stewart@navy.mil
15