Module 01 Course Project – Legislative Action
Total Points Possible
100
Insufficient/Not Evident
Progressing
Competent
Exemplary
Earned Points
Writing is free from spelling and grammar errors. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation
(5 Max Point Value)
(0pts.)
Paper is not submitted or more than 10 errors in English grammar and mechanics observed. Proper writing mechanics were not used.
(1-2 pts.)
6-10 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing mechanics somewhat used.
(3-4 pts.)
3-5 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing mechanics mostly used.
(5 pts.)
0-2 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation.
Paper meets minimum 2-page length requirement (5 Max Point Value)
(0 pts.)
Paper is not submitted.
(1-2 pts.)
Paper is less than 1 page in length
(3-4 pts.)
Paper is between 1-2 pages in length
(5 pts.)
Paper is at least 2 full pages in length.
Included a memo highlighting the key points of each Legislative Action.
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.
Transferrable Skills
Communication:
Discussed the purpose of each legislative action (15 Max Point Value)
(0-4pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate
(5-8 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.
(8-11 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.
(12-15 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.
Communication:
Described the problem/problems each action is trying to solve or prevent (10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.
Communication:
Discussed other viewpoints or opposing viewpoints of each action(10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understandi ...
Module 05 Course Project
Total Points Possible
100
Insufficient/Not Evident
Progressing
Competent
Exemplary
Earned Points
Included one interview
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-2 pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate
(3-5 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.
(6-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.
10
Writing is free from spelling and grammar errors. Included an introduction paragraph with thesis, and conclusion paragraph. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation
(20 Max Point Value)
(0-9pts.)
Paper is not submitted or more than 10 errors in English grammar and mechanics observed. No introduction paragraph, thesis, or conclusion paragraph included. Proper writing mechanics were not used.
(10-13 pts.)
6-10 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Missing 2 or more of the following: introduction paragraph with thesis, and conclusion paragraph. Proper writing mechanics somewhat used.
(14-17 pts.)
3-5 errors in English grammar and mechanics, and/or missing 1 or more of the following: introduction paragraph with thesis, and conclusion paragraph. Proper writing mechanics mostly used.
(18-20 pts.)
0-2 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Included an introduction paragraph with thesis, and conclusion paragraph. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation.
20
Paper meets minimum 5-page length requirement. Provided an APA formatted title page
(20 Max Point Value)
(0-9 pts.)
Paper is not submitted.
(10-13 pts.)
Paper is less than 3 pages in length, and/ or no APA title page provided.
(14-17 pts.)
Paper is between 3-4 pages in length and/or no APA title page provided.
(18-20 pts.)
Paper is at least 5 pages in length. APA formatted title page provided.
20
Transferable Skills
Critical Thinking:
Discussed the problem, alternative solutions, evaluated the alternatives, discussed selected alternative, and discussed follow-up to determine the effectiveness of decision.
(30 Max Point Value)
(0-9pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate
(10-18pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.
(19-24pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.
(25-30 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.
30
Communication:
Used proper audience tone for an organization decision-maker (10 Max Point Value)
(0-2 pts.)
Writing is inappropriate, does not use audie ...
Basic Grading Criteria ENGL1011234Indicate how the gra.docxgarnerangelika
This document outlines the basic grading criteria for ENGL101. It provides the grading scale from unsatisfactory to excellent and describes the points or percentage allocated to indicate the grade. It then lists 11 criteria for the paper such as format, introduction, thesis, body paragraphs, grammar, and citations. For each criterion, it provides descriptors for scoring from 0 to 10 points to assess the level from unsatisfactory to excellent. A total score out of 100 points will be provided.
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docxtidwellveronique
EDUC 741
Course Project: Part 1 Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Analysis
13 to 14 points
The analysis thoroughly interprets and examines at least three referred journal articles for perspective, validity, and significance of the findings.
12 points
The analysis partially interprets and examines at least three referred journal articles for perspective, validity, and significance of the findings.
1 to 11 points
The analysis attempts of some aspects of analysis and interpretation of journal articles in a limited way. The review is more descriptive than analytical.
0 points
Not present
Use of Evidence and Relevant Outside Information
13 points
The analysis is thoroughly supported with relevant facts, arguments, examples, and details. Information outside the subject articles is often incorporated into the analysis.
11 to 12 points
The analysis is generally supported with relevant facts, arguments, and details. Information outside the subject articles is occasionally incorporated into the analysis.
1 to 10 points
The analysis is thoroughly supported with some facts, arguments, examples, and details. Information outside the subject articles is incorporated in a limited way into the analysis.
0 points
Not present
Organization and Development
13 points
The analysis is quite well-reasoned, indicating substantial breath and depth of thinking. The summary of each article is thorough and meaningful.
11 to 12 points
The analysis is generally well-reasoned, indicating some breath and depth of thinking. The summary of each article is generally sound.
1 to 10 points
The analysis has limited reasoning, indicating a surface understanding of the articles. The summary of each article is limited.
0 points
Not present
Body – Biblical Worldview
13 points
A biblical worldview perspective is clearly articulated and is supported by appropriate Scripture references, course requirements, and application.
11 to 12 points
A biblical worldview perspective is articulated but is not supported by Scripture or is not appropriate, and somewhat applies to course requirements and application.
1 to 10 points
A biblical worldview perspective is poorly articulated and is not supported by Scripture or is not appropriate, and does not apply to course requirements and application.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Grammar and Spelling
6 points
Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the essay. There are 0–2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
5 points
There are 3–5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
1 to 4 points
There are 6–10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
0 points
There are more than 10 errors in the grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
Sentence Structure and Mechanics
6 points
Sentences are well-phrased and varied in lengt.
Performance Management and Training Scoring GuideCRITERIA NO.docxkarlhennesey
This document provides a scoring guide for assessing performance on a training and performance management assignment. It outlines six criteria that will be evaluated at different performance levels from non-performance to distinguished. The criteria include describing the organization's performance management system, explaining formal and informal feedback processes, analyzing best practices to improve employee performance, analyzing the importance of training, explaining how training and performance management protect against litigation, and writing in a professional style. Students will be scored on their adherence to requirements, writing quality, critical analysis, structure, referencing, and other factors to determine their final grade.
MSN Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal PapersCriteria.docxgilpinleeanna
MSN Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal Papers
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED -
1. The extent to which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking
(0–30 Points)
30 to 30 points
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the Assignment topics
25 to 29 points
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the Assignment topics
20 to 24 points
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the Assignment topics.
16 to 19 points
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
0 to 15 points
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED: Purpose of the paper is clear
(0–5 Points)
5 to 5 points
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to 5 points
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
4 to 4 points
Purpose of the Assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
1 to 3 points
Purpose of the Assignment is vague.
0 to 0 points
No purpose statement was provided.
ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS
The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to-
1. Understand and interpret the Assignment’s key concepts
(0–10 Points)
10 to 10 points
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
9 to 9 points
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
8 to 8 points
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
5 to 7 points
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
0 to 4 points
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS 2. Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e., video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources
(0–20 Points)
20 to 20 points
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3–4 course resources to support point of view.
15 to 19 points
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3–4 course resources to support point of view.
10 to 14 points
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 3–4 course resources to support major points and point of view.
3 to 9 points
Minimally includes and integ ...
PADM 620Assignment 3 Administrative Law InstructionsRead all .docxkarlhennesey
PADM 620
Assignment 3: Administrative Law Instructions
Read all instructions and the grading rubric carefully before writing this assignment. You are responsible for reading and understanding these documents.
For this assignment, you are required to choose between producing a PowerPoint presentation, a video presentation, or writing a research paper. This assignment must focus on the relationship between administrative law and public administration.
Read Exercise 8 in the Dresang text, the Metzger article, and conduct your own research; then you will draft a 5–7-page research paper or a 9–10-minute presentation. In your paper/presentation, you must explain the relationship between, and impact of, Administrative Law on Public Administration.
Option 1: Research Paper
If you elect to write a research paper for this assignment, the text of this research paper must be 5–7 pages (not including title page, reference page, and any appendices). This paper must be in current APA format with 1-inch margins and 12-pt Times New Roman font. A title page and reference page must also be included. You must include citations to at least 4–7 appropriate sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and the Bible) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. This assignment draws heavily from the assigned readings for this module/week and you are expected to illustrate your understanding of those sources.
Option 2: PowerPoint Presentation
If you elect to complete a PowerPoint presentation with audio (see tutorial in the Assignment Instructions folder for adding audio), the presentation must include 9–10 minutes of spoken audio. You must include citations to at least 4–7 appropriate sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and the Bible) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. This assignment draws heavily from the assigned readings for this module/week and you are expected to illustrate your understanding of those sources. In addition to the presentation, you must submit a separate document listing all references in current APA format.
Option 3: Video Presentation
If you elect to complete an original video presentation, the presentation must include 9–10 minutes of spoken audio. You must include citations to at least 4–7 appropriate sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and the Bible) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. This assignment draws heavily from the assigned readings for this module/week and you are expected to illustrate your understanding of those sources. Images may be incorporated where appropriate. In addition to the video, you must submit a separate document listing all references in current APA format.
General Instructions
You are expected to comport yourself with the highest writing, research, and ethical standards. Additionally, to do well on this assignment, you must conduct high quality research and offer rich, well-supported analysis and ...
Assignment RubricUnit 6 assignment grading rubric. Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. Total available points =275Content RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 3.94Professional in appearance and tone. The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). 10%0.00Reflects thoughtful and meaningful application of the policy argument.The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). 10%0.00Proposition of Policy: declares that a certain policy should or should not be created. The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). 10%0.00Create a convincing argument based on research of the topic. Makes an evaluation or judgment about the issue based on criteria that has been researched. The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). 10%0.00Declares that a certain policy should or should not be created. The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more tho ...
A company needs four separate offices around the world. The managersromeliadoan
A company needs four separate offices around the world. The managers want to be able to connect these offices together using the Internet, and they want to make sure that each location network is available to all the others. That is, they want the routing information for all four networks to be available at each site. Any employee should be able to access information located at the remote site. Management is worried about passing information over the Internet and monitoring for security and compliance reasons.
Answer the following questions and requirements to write your document of 3–5 pages. As you answer each question, you must provide support or evidence that will enhance and empirically prove your answers. Academic information technology (IT) articles or real-life IT findings that are not found in journals or other academic sources must be used in supporting your answers. Complete the following:
Discuss the latest implementations of routing protocols that would be necessary to accommodate the company's wide area network (WAN) and Internet connectivity.
Where is each protocol used in a WAN? How does each protocol work in a WAN?
How would the routing protocols discussed help in the monitoring of passing traffic over the corporate network and the Internet under safe and secure conditions? Provide examples of how this would be done and why it would be done in this fashion.
If you were able to develop another solution for this network that supports the organizational requirements, what would be your recommendation? Compare and contrast your alternative with the one initially discussed.
Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.
For more information on APA, please visit the Library, and click on Citation Resources link.
Please submit your assignment.
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
Grading Criteria
Project Criteria
Exceeds: 90%–100%
Very Good: 80%–89%
Meets: 70%–79%
Needs Improvement: Below 70%
Content
(75%)
Response covers all topics indicated in the assignment and adds additional content. Response covers most topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers many of the topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers none to some of the topics indicated in the assignment.
Effective Communication
(10%)
Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Organization is clear. Format is consistently appropriate to assignment. Presentation and delivery are confident and persuasive (where applicable). The writing was of collegiate level with no errors in spelling or grammar. Demonstrates very good written, visual, or oral skills. De ...
Module 05 Course Project
Total Points Possible
100
Insufficient/Not Evident
Progressing
Competent
Exemplary
Earned Points
Included one interview
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-2 pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate
(3-5 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.
(6-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.
10
Writing is free from spelling and grammar errors. Included an introduction paragraph with thesis, and conclusion paragraph. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation
(20 Max Point Value)
(0-9pts.)
Paper is not submitted or more than 10 errors in English grammar and mechanics observed. No introduction paragraph, thesis, or conclusion paragraph included. Proper writing mechanics were not used.
(10-13 pts.)
6-10 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Missing 2 or more of the following: introduction paragraph with thesis, and conclusion paragraph. Proper writing mechanics somewhat used.
(14-17 pts.)
3-5 errors in English grammar and mechanics, and/or missing 1 or more of the following: introduction paragraph with thesis, and conclusion paragraph. Proper writing mechanics mostly used.
(18-20 pts.)
0-2 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Included an introduction paragraph with thesis, and conclusion paragraph. Used proper writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence structure, transitions, and punctuation.
20
Paper meets minimum 5-page length requirement. Provided an APA formatted title page
(20 Max Point Value)
(0-9 pts.)
Paper is not submitted.
(10-13 pts.)
Paper is less than 3 pages in length, and/ or no APA title page provided.
(14-17 pts.)
Paper is between 3-4 pages in length and/or no APA title page provided.
(18-20 pts.)
Paper is at least 5 pages in length. APA formatted title page provided.
20
Transferable Skills
Critical Thinking:
Discussed the problem, alternative solutions, evaluated the alternatives, discussed selected alternative, and discussed follow-up to determine the effectiveness of decision.
(30 Max Point Value)
(0-9pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely inaccurate
(10-18pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes some inaccuracies.
(19-24pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and explanations.
(25-30 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an extraordinary understanding through rich examples and explanations.
30
Communication:
Used proper audience tone for an organization decision-maker (10 Max Point Value)
(0-2 pts.)
Writing is inappropriate, does not use audie ...
Basic Grading Criteria ENGL1011234Indicate how the gra.docxgarnerangelika
This document outlines the basic grading criteria for ENGL101. It provides the grading scale from unsatisfactory to excellent and describes the points or percentage allocated to indicate the grade. It then lists 11 criteria for the paper such as format, introduction, thesis, body paragraphs, grammar, and citations. For each criterion, it provides descriptors for scoring from 0 to 10 points to assess the level from unsatisfactory to excellent. A total score out of 100 points will be provided.
EDUC 741Course Project Part 1 Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docxtidwellveronique
EDUC 741
Course Project: Part 1 Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Analysis
13 to 14 points
The analysis thoroughly interprets and examines at least three referred journal articles for perspective, validity, and significance of the findings.
12 points
The analysis partially interprets and examines at least three referred journal articles for perspective, validity, and significance of the findings.
1 to 11 points
The analysis attempts of some aspects of analysis and interpretation of journal articles in a limited way. The review is more descriptive than analytical.
0 points
Not present
Use of Evidence and Relevant Outside Information
13 points
The analysis is thoroughly supported with relevant facts, arguments, examples, and details. Information outside the subject articles is often incorporated into the analysis.
11 to 12 points
The analysis is generally supported with relevant facts, arguments, and details. Information outside the subject articles is occasionally incorporated into the analysis.
1 to 10 points
The analysis is thoroughly supported with some facts, arguments, examples, and details. Information outside the subject articles is incorporated in a limited way into the analysis.
0 points
Not present
Organization and Development
13 points
The analysis is quite well-reasoned, indicating substantial breath and depth of thinking. The summary of each article is thorough and meaningful.
11 to 12 points
The analysis is generally well-reasoned, indicating some breath and depth of thinking. The summary of each article is generally sound.
1 to 10 points
The analysis has limited reasoning, indicating a surface understanding of the articles. The summary of each article is limited.
0 points
Not present
Body – Biblical Worldview
13 points
A biblical worldview perspective is clearly articulated and is supported by appropriate Scripture references, course requirements, and application.
11 to 12 points
A biblical worldview perspective is articulated but is not supported by Scripture or is not appropriate, and somewhat applies to course requirements and application.
1 to 10 points
A biblical worldview perspective is poorly articulated and is not supported by Scripture or is not appropriate, and does not apply to course requirements and application.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Grammar and Spelling
6 points
Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the essay. There are 0–2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
5 points
There are 3–5 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
1 to 4 points
There are 6–10 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
0 points
There are more than 10 errors in the grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
Sentence Structure and Mechanics
6 points
Sentences are well-phrased and varied in lengt.
Performance Management and Training Scoring GuideCRITERIA NO.docxkarlhennesey
This document provides a scoring guide for assessing performance on a training and performance management assignment. It outlines six criteria that will be evaluated at different performance levels from non-performance to distinguished. The criteria include describing the organization's performance management system, explaining formal and informal feedback processes, analyzing best practices to improve employee performance, analyzing the importance of training, explaining how training and performance management protect against litigation, and writing in a professional style. Students will be scored on their adherence to requirements, writing quality, critical analysis, structure, referencing, and other factors to determine their final grade.
MSN Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal PapersCriteria.docxgilpinleeanna
MSN Evaluation Criteria for Applications and Formal Papers
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Outstanding Performance
Excellent Performance
Competent Performance
Proficient Performance
Room for Improvement
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED -
1. The extent to which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking
(0–30 Points)
30 to 30 points
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the Assignment topics
25 to 29 points
Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the Assignment topics
20 to 24 points
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the Assignment topics.
16 to 19 points
Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
0 to 15 points
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
QUALITY OF WORK SUBMITTED: Purpose of the paper is clear
(0–5 Points)
5 to 5 points
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 to 5 points
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
4 to 4 points
Purpose of the Assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
1 to 3 points
Purpose of the Assignment is vague.
0 to 0 points
No purpose statement was provided.
ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS
The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to-
1. Understand and interpret the Assignment’s key concepts
(0–10 Points)
10 to 10 points
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
9 to 9 points
Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
8 to 8 points
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
5 to 7 points
Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
0 to 4 points
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
ASSIMILATION AND SYNTHESIS OF IDEAS 2. Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e., video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources
(0–20 Points)
20 to 20 points
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3–4 course resources to support point of view.
15 to 19 points
Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 3–4 course resources to support point of view.
10 to 14 points
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 3–4 course resources to support major points and point of view.
3 to 9 points
Minimally includes and integ ...
PADM 620Assignment 3 Administrative Law InstructionsRead all .docxkarlhennesey
PADM 620
Assignment 3: Administrative Law Instructions
Read all instructions and the grading rubric carefully before writing this assignment. You are responsible for reading and understanding these documents.
For this assignment, you are required to choose between producing a PowerPoint presentation, a video presentation, or writing a research paper. This assignment must focus on the relationship between administrative law and public administration.
Read Exercise 8 in the Dresang text, the Metzger article, and conduct your own research; then you will draft a 5–7-page research paper or a 9–10-minute presentation. In your paper/presentation, you must explain the relationship between, and impact of, Administrative Law on Public Administration.
Option 1: Research Paper
If you elect to write a research paper for this assignment, the text of this research paper must be 5–7 pages (not including title page, reference page, and any appendices). This paper must be in current APA format with 1-inch margins and 12-pt Times New Roman font. A title page and reference page must also be included. You must include citations to at least 4–7 appropriate sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and the Bible) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. This assignment draws heavily from the assigned readings for this module/week and you are expected to illustrate your understanding of those sources.
Option 2: PowerPoint Presentation
If you elect to complete a PowerPoint presentation with audio (see tutorial in the Assignment Instructions folder for adding audio), the presentation must include 9–10 minutes of spoken audio. You must include citations to at least 4–7 appropriate sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and the Bible) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. This assignment draws heavily from the assigned readings for this module/week and you are expected to illustrate your understanding of those sources. In addition to the presentation, you must submit a separate document listing all references in current APA format.
Option 3: Video Presentation
If you elect to complete an original video presentation, the presentation must include 9–10 minutes of spoken audio. You must include citations to at least 4–7 appropriate sources (in addition to the course textbooks, assigned readings, and the Bible) to fully support your assertions and conclusions. This assignment draws heavily from the assigned readings for this module/week and you are expected to illustrate your understanding of those sources. Images may be incorporated where appropriate. In addition to the video, you must submit a separate document listing all references in current APA format.
General Instructions
You are expected to comport yourself with the highest writing, research, and ethical standards. Additionally, to do well on this assignment, you must conduct high quality research and offer rich, well-supported analysis and ...
Assignment RubricUnit 6 assignment grading rubric. Instructors: Enter total available points in cell H2, and values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. Total available points =275Content RubricIntroductoryEmergentPracticedProficient/MasteredScoreWeightFinal Score0 - 1.92 - 2.93 - 3.94Professional in appearance and tone. The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). 10%0.00Reflects thoughtful and meaningful application of the policy argument.The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). 10%0.00Proposition of Policy: declares that a certain policy should or should not be created. The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). 10%0.00Create a convincing argument based on research of the topic. Makes an evaluation or judgment about the issue based on criteria that has been researched. The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. Entry well-constructed and demonstrated basic connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). Group project demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (legal synthesis of malpractice case). 10%0.00Declares that a certain policy should or should not be created. The assignment does not address any or all of this section. The assignment contains some information on this area of focus, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more tho ...
A company needs four separate offices around the world. The managersromeliadoan
A company needs four separate offices around the world. The managers want to be able to connect these offices together using the Internet, and they want to make sure that each location network is available to all the others. That is, they want the routing information for all four networks to be available at each site. Any employee should be able to access information located at the remote site. Management is worried about passing information over the Internet and monitoring for security and compliance reasons.
Answer the following questions and requirements to write your document of 3–5 pages. As you answer each question, you must provide support or evidence that will enhance and empirically prove your answers. Academic information technology (IT) articles or real-life IT findings that are not found in journals or other academic sources must be used in supporting your answers. Complete the following:
Discuss the latest implementations of routing protocols that would be necessary to accommodate the company's wide area network (WAN) and Internet connectivity.
Where is each protocol used in a WAN? How does each protocol work in a WAN?
How would the routing protocols discussed help in the monitoring of passing traffic over the corporate network and the Internet under safe and secure conditions? Provide examples of how this would be done and why it would be done in this fashion.
If you were able to develop another solution for this network that supports the organizational requirements, what would be your recommendation? Compare and contrast your alternative with the one initially discussed.
Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.
For more information on APA, please visit the Library, and click on Citation Resources link.
Please submit your assignment.
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
Grading Criteria
Project Criteria
Exceeds: 90%–100%
Very Good: 80%–89%
Meets: 70%–79%
Needs Improvement: Below 70%
Content
(75%)
Response covers all topics indicated in the assignment and adds additional content. Response covers most topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers many of the topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers none to some of the topics indicated in the assignment.
Effective Communication
(10%)
Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Organization is clear. Format is consistently appropriate to assignment. Presentation and delivery are confident and persuasive (where applicable). The writing was of collegiate level with no errors in spelling or grammar. Demonstrates very good written, visual, or oral skills. De ...
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. WhaBenitoSumpter862
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. WhaSantosConleyha
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. what is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. whaSUKHI5
This document outlines criteria for evaluating a student paper on collaboration in the juvenile justice system. It discusses the importance of considering opposing viewpoints, logically deriving conclusions, and adhering to formatting standards like APA style. Key points that must be addressed include the meaning of collaboration, challenges collaborative efforts face, and how to support positions with evidence from assigned readings and a Christian worldview perspective.
Research Paper Grading RubricAbnormal Psychology #1 Categ.docxronak56
Research Paper Grading Rubric
Abnormal Psychology
#1 Category
Excellent/Good 100-94 = A
93-86 = B
Fair (Average)
85-78 = C
Needs Improvement
77-70 = D
Poor
69-0 = F
Format/Length
1 inch margins, double spaced, APA format,
Title Page is correct,
Running head,
Page numbers,
At least 5 pages of text.
(20 points)
(18-20 points)
-Paper is correctly in APA style, double spaced, and in10-12 pt. font.
-Title page includes all required elements (Title, name, course, centered), -running head in correct corner.
-pages numbered correctly.
-College level paper.
-Clean, concise, and well organized.
-Flows well, good transitions between paragraphs.
-No run-on sentences or run away paragraphs.
-No grammatical mistakes, syntax errors or typos.
-Content is strong, thesis is CLEAR.
-Length is 5-10 pages.
(16-17 points)
-Correct format and double spacing, 10-12 pt. font.
-Minor problems with the title page such as no running head or missing class number.
-Overall writing ability is good.
-There are a few grammatical mistakes, syntax errors or typos, etc.
-Transitions between paragraphs are a little rough.
-Length 4 pages.
(14-15 points)
-Important information missing on title page.
-Missing multiple components of title page.
-Not double spaced with the font of 10-12.
-No running head. Content of paper in APA with incorrect margins.
-Writing techniques needs some work.
-More than 5 grammatical mistakes, syntax errors or typos, etc.
-Flow of paper is choppy.
-Thesis is poorly identified.
-Writing is hard to follow, confusing.
-Length 3 pages.
(0-13 points)
-Major problems with the title page, set in wrong style, wrong ink, use of BOLD print, or no title page.
-2 to 3 inch margins instead of 1 inch, not double spaced.
-Use of abbreviations or numerals to shorten sentences.
-No professional writing/tone.
-Not college level writing! Numerous grammatical mistakes, syntax errors or typos, etc.
-Less than 3 pages or more than 10 pages.
#2 Category
Excellent/Good 100-94 = A
93-86 = B
Fair (Average)
85-78 = C
Needs Improvement
77-70= D
Poor
69-0 = F
First Person Format: You must be “in character” for the first 5 parts of this paper
(10 points)
(9-10 points)
The paper is written in 1st person format. Steps out of character are appropriate and noted.
(8 points)
3-4 parts of paper are in 1st person format. Steps of character are not clear
(7 points)
1-2 parts of paper are in 1st person format.
-Not clear as to when in character or not.
(0-6 points)
Not in 1st person format.
#3 Category
Excellent/Good 100-94 = A
93-86 = B
Fair (Average)
85-78 = C
Needs Improvement
77-70 = D
Poor
69-0 = F
Symptoms the Person is Experiencing:
(10 points)
(9-10 points)
-All material related to the subtopic, main topic.
-Strong organization and integration of material within subtopics.
-Strong transitions linking subtopic to main topic.
-Full list of symptoms listed.
(8 points)
-All material clearly related to the subtop ...
This data set is a sample of Web server statistics for a computer .docxgasciognecaren
This data set
is a sample of Web server statistics for a computer science department. It contains the following 11 sections of data:
Total successful requests
Average successful requests per day
Total successful requests for pages
Average successful requests for pages per day
Total failed requests
Total redirected requests
Number of distinct files requested
Number of distinct hosts served
Corrupt logfile lines
Total data transferred
Average data transferred per day
Write an essay of 2–3 pages that contains the following:
A complete overview of the data, identifying anomalies in different weeks, and the weeks that the data are not regular.
Choose 5 different sections of data, examine these sections, and provide the specific selection process and criteria you used to select this data set.
Provide the measures of tendency and dispersion for each of the 5 different sections of data you selected.
Provide 1 chart or graph for each of the 5 processed sections. This may be a pie or bar chart or a histogram.
Label the chart or graph clearly.
Explain why the graph you provided gave a good visual representation of the data.
Based on your explanation above, identify some specific advantages why, in general, charts and graphs are important in conveying information in a visual format.
Determine the standard deviation and variation, and explain their importance in statistical analysis of a data set.
Based on the tasks you performed in this project, research how statistics are used in information technology (IT), and provide references for your research
Your essay should include proper citation in APA formatting, both in-text, and in reference pages. Include a title page and use 12-point Times New Roman double-spaced font throughout the text.
This assignment will also be assessed using additional criteria provided
here
.
Please submit your assignment.
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
Grading Rubric
Project Criteria
Exceeds: 90%–100%
Very Good: 80%–89%
Meets: 70%–79%
Needs Improvement: Below 70%
Content
(75%)
Response covers all topics indicated in the assignment and adds additional content. Response covers most topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers many of the topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers none to some of the topics indicated in the assignment.
Effective Communication
(10%)
Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Organization is clear. Format is consistently appropriate to assignment. Presentation and delivery are confident and persuasive (where applic ...
1/21/22, 2:41 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Applications in Cybe…y Management and Policy (2222) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assess…5244&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0
50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 485 6380 Prac!cal Applica!ons in Cybersecurity Management and Policy (2222)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
Use of Authorita!ve
Sources
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Ap ...
1/21/22, 2:41 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Applications in Cybe…y Management and Policy (2222) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assess…5244&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0
50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 485 6380 Prac!cal Applica!ons in Cybersecurity Management and Policy (2222)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
Use of Authorita!ve
Sources
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Ap ...
11/12/21, 11:04 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessm…5&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0&viewTypeId=3
Close
Print Rubric50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on ...
11/12/21, 11:04 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessm…5&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0&viewTypeId=3
Close
Print Rubric50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on ...
file.jpeg
file1.jpeg
file2.jpeg
file3.jpeg
file4.jpeg
file5.jpeg
file6.jpeg
file7.jpeg
file8.jpeg
file9.jpeg
Research Report Rubric
Unsatisfactory
Needs Work
Good
Excellent
Report Title
No title or title not relevant to the topic of the paper
(0 points)
Major issues with title clarity, completeness or accuracy
(1 point)
Minor issues with title clarity, completeness or accuracy
(1.5 points)
Report title is clear, complete and accurate
(2 points)
Title Page
Title page is missing
(0 points)
Major appearance or error issues on title page
(1 point)
Minor appearance or error issues on title page
(1.5 points)
Title page has a professional appearance and is error free
(2 points)
Table of Contents
Table of Contents is missing
(0 points)
Major errors in table of contents
(1 point)
Minor errors in table of contents
(1.5 points)
A correct table of contents in the appropriate format is present
(2 points)
Formatting
The paper is not double spaced. The font used is incorrect. Margins and spacing is inconsistent.
(0 points)
Major issues in formatting
(1-2 points)
Minor issues in formatting
(3-4 points)
The paper is double spaced. Times New Roman 12 point font is used. Appropriate margins and spacing are used throughout the paper.
(5 points)
Headings
No headings are used in the paper
(0 points)
Major issues with headings
(1-2 points)
Minor issues with headings
(3-4 points)
Headings are descriptive, parallel and used appropriately
(5 points)
Length
The paper length is inappropriate—less than 1200 words
(0 points)
The paper is very short—more than 1200 words but less than 1700 words
(1-2 points)
The paper is a little short--more than 1700 words but less than 2000 words
(3 points)
The paper is a minimum of 2000 words
(4 points)
Content
The paper reflects little to no understanding on the topic of choice
(0-11 points)
Major issues with understanding or presenting information on the topic of choice
(12-17 points)
Minor issues with understanding or presenting information on the topic of choice
(18-23 points)
The paper reflects understanding on the topic of choice
(24-25 points)
Quality of Information
The information in the paper is not based on careful research, is not appropriately presented, is not technically sound and does not fulfill the report’s purpose.
(0-11 points)
Major issues with the quality of research, presentation or fulfilling the report’s purpose.
(12-17 points)
Minor issues with the quality of research, presentation or fulfilling the report’s purpose.
(18-23 points)
The information in the paper is based on careful research, appropriately presented, technically sound and fulfills the report’s purpose.
(24-25 points)
Clarity
The paper is not clear, easy to read or understand. Significant information in the paper does not directly relate to the topic.
(0-7 points)
Major issues with coherency or readability.
Some information in paper that does not relate to the topic.
(8-10 points)
Minor issues with coher.
Click here to refer to the instructions for the Unit 1 lab tasks.docxvernettacrofts
Click
here
to refer to the instructions for the Unit 1 lab tasks.
The Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) Layer 3 (Network Layer) is one of the layers that perform packet segmentation. The OSI Layer 3 is roughly equivalent to the Internet Layer of the Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) model, and the Layer 4 (Transport Layer) of the OSI model is roughly equivalent to the Host-to-Host layer of the TCP/IP model. The above two layers perform network segmentation. Based on the above information, answer the following questions.
Describe in detail how packets are segmented by the Host-to-host layer (Transport Layer) Internet Layer of the TCP/IP model.
Do all packets arrive at their destination in the order in which they were segmented and transmitted? Why or why not?
Describe how segmented packets are rearranged or reassembled at the packets’ destination to ensure that received segmented packets match the order in which they were segmented and transmitted.
How are errors handled during transmission of segmented packets?
What is the difference between a TCP segment and an IP packet?
Please answer the following questions and requirements to write your paper of 4–5 pages. As you answer each question, you must provide support or evidence that will enhance and empirically prove your answers. Academic information technology (IT) articles or real-life IT findings that are not found in journals or other academic sources must be used in supporting your answers. Please use APA style for all cited sources, including your reference page.
Please include the following elements in your paper of 4–5 pages:
A title page
A report that includes the following:
An introduction to the contents of the report
Detailed explanations about the items listed regarding network segmentation, error handling, TCP segments and TCP packets.
Please cite your references in APA format.
For more information on APA, please visit the library, and click on Citation Resources link.
Please submit your assignment.
Grading Criteria
Project Criteria
Exceeds: 90%–100%
Very Good: 80%–89%
Meets: 70%–79%
Needs Improvement: Below 70%
Content
(75%)
Response covers all topics indicated in the assignment and adds additional content. Response covers most topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers many of the topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers none to some of the topics indicated in the assignment.
Effective Communication
(10%)
Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Organization is clear. Format is consistently appropriate to assignment. Presentation and delivery are confident and persuasive (wh ...
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docxSONU61709
1. Citation:
Written in APA format. For more help with formatting, see APA handout.
1. Summary:
What is purpose of the source, review article, original research? What topics are covered? This is generally 1 -3 sentences that summarize the author’s main point. For more help, see this link on paraphrasing sources.
1. Assessment:
After summarizing the article (or research paper or book) it is necessary to evaluate it and also where you found it – its source (e.g. journal, website, etc). Briefly answer the following questions:
What is the format or type of source. How reliable is the information in the article and how credible is the source and the author(s)? Is this article biased or objective?
For more help, see this handout on evaluating resources.
1. Critique
Once you've summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Why is this source relevant to your research paper and how can you use this source in your research project? What are the strengths and weaknesses? It is biased in any way? Compare the source with other sources in your bibliography.
Source 1- http://www.mslifelines.com/what-is-ms?cmp=M_WhatIsMS_MSLLGuideToMS_Google_PS&gclid=COrwht6_ns0CFdU7gQodi7MHjg
Source 2- http://www.nationalmssociety.org/What-is-MS
Source 3- http://www.healthline.com/health/multiple-sclerosis/early-signs
Source 4- http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/37556.php
Source 5- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1069023/
Assignment 4: Research Paper Rubric
Evaluation Criteria
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Points Earned
Abstract
TOTAL: (15 points)
(10 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Topic Sentence
· Five main topics introduced: Statistics/Epidemiology, Financial Costs, Anatomy & Physiology/ Etiology, Diagnosis/Treatments/ Prognosis,
· Conclusions and Findings, Future Directions/Research
Response to Assignment 3 Feedback
(5 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Did student respond to and fix issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignments 3?
10 points
Abstract contains all of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and briefly presents conclusions.
5 points
Student responded to and fixed issues identified by the instructor feedback for
Assignment 3
~or~ There were no issues in the instructor feedback for the student to respond to in Assignment 3
~or~ Assignment 3 was not submitted by the student
9 - 8 points
Abstract contains four of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and presents conclusions.
7 - 6 points
Abstract contains three of the required criteria.
Abstract is lacking in introduction sentence, information, and/or conclusion statement.
< 6 points
Abstract contains two or less of the required criteria.
Abstract is not present. (0 points)
0 points
Student did not address all the issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignment 3
Main Body Content
TOTAL: (50 ...
THEO 650 Ethics Research Paper Final Submission Grading RubricCr.docxarnoldmeredith47041
THEO 650 Ethics Research Paper Final Submission Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced 92-100% (A)
Proficient 84-91% (B)
Developing 1-83% (< C)
Not present
Introduction
18 to 20 points
There is a clear thesis statement. The topic is identified. The introduction provides a clear overview of the paper’s contents.
17 points
The topic is identified, a thesis statement is provided, and the reader knows generally where the paper is heading.
1 to 16 points
The introduction is minimal, brief, and cursory.
0 points
Content, Argumentation, and Evidence
75 to 81 points
The paper interacts with a specific crucial approach or builds a positive case for an aspect of the resurrection. The paper applies appropriate methods of argumentation and evidences to defend its thesis. The paper approaches the topic logically and does not contain fallacious argumentation.
68 to 74 points
The paper interacts with a specific crucial approach or builds a positive case for an aspect of the resurrection. Argumentation and evidence is given with some depth. The paper approaches the topic logically and contains few mistakes in reasoning.
1 to 67 points
The paper’s topic is broad and does fully meet the requirements for the assignment. Cursory evidence and argumentation is given for main points made throughout the paper.
0 points
Conclusion
18 to 20 points
The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper.
17 points
The conclusion is given and offers a general summary of issues treated in the paper.
1 to 16 points
The conclusion is minimal, brief, and cursory.
0 points
Structure 30%
Advanced 92-100% (A)
Proficient 84-91% (B)
Developing 1-83% (< C)
Not present
Structure and Format
11 to 12 points
There are clear transitions between paragraphs and between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. Headings are properly used throughout.
10 points
Transitional elements are used between paragraphs and sections. The paper generally flows in a logical manner. Headings are generally correct.
1 to 9 points
Few transitional elements are provided between paragraphs and sections. The paper lacks a logical flow. Few or no headings are used throughout.
0 points
Style and Grammar
11 to 12 points
The paper properly uses current Turabian. It has a title page, Proper headings, footnotes, and bibliography are used. The paper reflects a graduate level of vocabulary. Assignment contains fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Minimal errors (1-2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper Turabian format.
10 points
Turabian formatting is used throughout. Assignment contains 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Few errors (3-4) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper Turabian format.
1 to 9 points
Assignment contains 5 or more errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader fr.
THEO 650 Ethics Research Paper Final Submission Grading RubricCr.docxsusannr
THEO 650 Ethics Research Paper Final Submission Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced 92-100% (A)
Proficient 84-91% (B)
Developing 1-83% (< C)
Not present
Introduction
18 to 20 points
There is a clear thesis statement. The topic is identified. The introduction provides a clear overview of the paper’s contents.
17 points
The topic is identified, a thesis statement is provided, and the reader knows generally where the paper is heading.
1 to 16 points
The introduction is minimal, brief, and cursory.
0 points
Content, Argumentation, and Evidence
75 to 81 points
The paper interacts with a specific crucial approach or builds a positive case for an aspect of the resurrection. The paper applies appropriate methods of argumentation and evidences to defend its thesis. The paper approaches the topic logically and does not contain fallacious argumentation.
68 to 74 points
The paper interacts with a specific crucial approach or builds a positive case for an aspect of the resurrection. Argumentation and evidence is given with some depth. The paper approaches the topic logically and contains few mistakes in reasoning.
1 to 67 points
The paper’s topic is broad and does fully meet the requirements for the assignment. Cursory evidence and argumentation is given for main points made throughout the paper.
0 points
Conclusion
18 to 20 points
The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper.
17 points
The conclusion is given and offers a general summary of issues treated in the paper.
1 to 16 points
The conclusion is minimal, brief, and cursory.
0 points
Structure 30%
Advanced 92-100% (A)
Proficient 84-91% (B)
Developing 1-83% (< C)
Not present
Structure and Format
11 to 12 points
There are clear transitions between paragraphs and between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. Headings are properly used throughout.
10 points
Transitional elements are used between paragraphs and sections. The paper generally flows in a logical manner. Headings are generally correct.
1 to 9 points
Few transitional elements are provided between paragraphs and sections. The paper lacks a logical flow. Few or no headings are used throughout.
0 points
Style and Grammar
11 to 12 points
The paper properly uses current Turabian. It has a title page, Proper headings, footnotes, and bibliography are used. The paper reflects a graduate level of vocabulary. Assignment contains fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Minimal errors (1-2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper Turabian format.
10 points
Turabian formatting is used throughout. Assignment contains 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Few errors (3-4) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper Turabian format.
1 to 9 points
Assignment contains 5 or more errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader fr.
Most women experience their closest friendships with those of th.docxroushhsiu
Most women experience their closest friendships with those of the same sex. Men have suffered more of a stigma in terms of sharing deep bonds with other men. Open affection and connection is not actively encouraged among men. Recent changes in society might impact this, especially with the advent of the meterosexual male. “The meterosexual male is less interested in blood lines, traditions, family, class, gender, than in choosing who they want to be and who they want to be with” (Vernon, 2010, p. 204).
In this week’s reading material, the following philosophers discuss their views on this topic: Simone de Beauvoir, Thomas Aquinas, MacIntyre, Friedman, Hunt, and Foucault. Make sure to incorporate their views as you answer each discussion question. Think about how their views may be similar or different from your own. In at least 250 words total, please answer each of the following, drawing upon your reading materials and your personal insight:
To what extent do you think women still have a better opportunity to forge deeper friendships than men? What needs to change to level the friendship playing field for men, if anything?
How is the role of the meterosexual man helping to forge a new pathway for male friendships?
.
Morgan and Dunn JD have hired you to assist with a case involvin.docxroushhsiu
Morgan and Dunn JD have hired you to assist with a case involving domestic abuse. The evidence is contained on a password-protected laptop that the plaintiff (the wife) indicates will show a pattern of abuse. You have to decide what equipment and software to purchase to assist with the case and safely extract the data from the laptop.
.
Mortality rates vary between the Hispanic community and the gene.docxroushhsiu
Mortality rates vary between the Hispanic community and the general population. Discuss the leading causes of death and illness among Hispanic Americans and the options the Advanced Practice Nurse has to overcome the disparity of healthcare for this population.
The post should be a minimum of 200 words, scholarly written, APA7 formatted, and referenced. Free of plagiarism and gramatical errors. A minimum of 2 references is required (other than your text).
.
Moreno Industries has adopted the following production budget for th.docxroushhsiu
Moreno Industries has adopted the following production budget for the first 4 months of 2013.
Month Units Month Units
January 10,000 March 5,000
February 8,000 April 4,000
Each unit requires 3 pounds of raw materials costing $2 per pound. On December 31, 2012, the ending raw materials inventory was 9,000 pounds. Management wants to have a raw materials inventory at the end of the month equal to 30% of next month's production requirements.
Complete the direct materials purchases budget by month for the first quarter.
.
Most people have a blend of leadership styles that they use. Some le.docxroushhsiu
Most people have a blend of leadership styles that they use. Some leaders are more flexible in applying a wide range of leadership styles, whereas others are more consistent and generally use just one or two preferred behaviors. Consider if two strong individuals begin a new company and discuss the following:
If two diverse individuals, each having a different leadership style, were tasked with effectively co-leading an organization, what potential conflicts might occur between these different leadership styles?
How will their personal leadership styles influence the organizational culture?
How would you recommend that these two leaders work together most effectively?
.
Moral rights as opposed to legal rights are not dependent on a polit.docxroushhsiu
The document discusses various moral and legal rights theories as they relate to issues of discrimination based on sex. It outlines moral rights as distinct from legal rights, and examines several ethical theories that support moral rights. It also discusses key aspects of legal rights, justice theories, Aristotle's theory of justice, and Nozick's entitlement theory of justice. The document provides context and issues for an analysis of whether sex should remain a protected class and the implications of removing legal protections against sexual discrimination.
Montasari, R., & Hill, R. (2019). Next-Generation Digital Forens.docxroushhsiu
Montasari, R., & Hill, R. (2019). Next-Generation Digital Forensics: Challenges and Future Paradigms.
2019 IEEE 12th International Conference on Global Security, Safety and Sustainability (ICGS3), Global Security, Safety and Sustainability (ICGS3)
, 205.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGS3.2019.8688020
Sahinoglu, M., Stockton, S., Barclay, R. M., & Morton, S. (2016). Metrics Based Risk Assessment and Management of Digital Forensics.
Defense Acquisition Research Journal: A Publication of the Defense Acquisition University, 23
(2), 152–177.
https://doi.org/10.22594/dau.16-748.23.02
Nnoli, H. Lindskog, D, Zavarsky, P., Aghili, S., & Ruhl, R. (2012). The Governance of Corporate Forensics Using COBIT, NIST and Increased Automated Forensic Approaches,
2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Conference on Social Computing, Amsterdam
, 734-741.
After reading articles expand on investigation and of digital forensic analysis and investigations. Organizations, especially those in the public, health and educational areas are bound by legal and statutory requirements to protect data and private information, therefore digital forensics analysis will be very beneficial when security breaches do occur. Using this weeks readings and your own research, discuss digital forensics and how it could be used in a risk management program.
Please make your initial post and two response posts substantive. A substantive post will do at least two of the following:
Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
Answer a question (in detail) posted by another student or the instructor
Provide extensive additional information on the topic
Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail
Share an applicable personal experience
Provide an outside source that applies to the topic, along with additional information about the topic or the source (please cite properly in APA 7)
Make an argument concerning the topic.
.
More Related Content
Similar to Module 01 Course Project – Legislative ActionTotal Points Possib.docx
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. WhaBenitoSumpter862
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. WhaSantosConleyha
1. What is the role of federalism in framing youth issues?
2. What are the Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative's five objectives for reform in the juvenile justice system?
3. How can fragmentation and tunneling be overcome?
4. What is important to consider when using a data-driven approach to decision making?
CJUS 702
Activity Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
(70%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Question Content
18.5 to 20 points:
· Major points are stated clearly and are supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning.
· Objective, reasoned analysis is employed.
· An authoritative and persuasive voice is used.
· Resonates Christian world view supporting your themes throughout your writing.
· Four fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 2 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
· Most major points are stated clearly and supported by valid evidence and logical reasoning, but some points may require clarification or greater support.
· Some improvements to objective tone/perspective may be required.
· Further interpretation and/or support for Christian world view needed.
· Less than 4 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· Use of 1 peer-reviewed scholarly references along with course materials/texts.
1 to 16.5 points:
· Major points require significant clarification and scholarly or Christian world view support.
· Significant improvements to objective tone/perspective are required.
· Less than 3 fully developed pages of content excluding the title-page, abstract, and reference page (s).
· No external peer-reviewed scholarly references other than course materials/texts.
0 points
Not present
Opposing Viewpoints
18.5 to 20 points:
Opposing viewpoints are sufficiently acknowledged and critically evaluated.
16.75 to 18.25 points:
Opposing viewpoints are acknowledged but may require greater evaluation.
1 to 16.5 points:
Opposing viewpoints are not adequately acknowledged and/or addressed.
0 points
Not present
Conclusion
11.5 to 12.5 points:
The conclusion logically derives from the paper’s ideas.
10.5 to 11.25 points:
The conclusion does not fully derive from the paper’s ideas.
1 to 10.25 points:
Conclusion does not derive logically from the paper’s main ideas.
0 points
Not present
Structure (30%)
Advanced
92-100%
Proficient
84-91%
Developing
1-83%
Not present
Total
Grammar, Spelling, & Format
13.75 to 15 points:
Minimal to no errors in grammar or spelling. Formatted in current APA format.
12.5 to 13.5 points:
Minor errors in spelling and grammar. Minor adjustments needed in APA format.
1 to 12.25 points:
Numerous errors in spelling or grammar. Not formatted in current APA format.
0 points
Not present
Page Length
7 to 7.5 points:
Required page length of 4 pages is met. This does not include title-page, ...
1. what is the role of federalism in framing youth issues2. whaSUKHI5
This document outlines criteria for evaluating a student paper on collaboration in the juvenile justice system. It discusses the importance of considering opposing viewpoints, logically deriving conclusions, and adhering to formatting standards like APA style. Key points that must be addressed include the meaning of collaboration, challenges collaborative efforts face, and how to support positions with evidence from assigned readings and a Christian worldview perspective.
Research Paper Grading RubricAbnormal Psychology #1 Categ.docxronak56
Research Paper Grading Rubric
Abnormal Psychology
#1 Category
Excellent/Good 100-94 = A
93-86 = B
Fair (Average)
85-78 = C
Needs Improvement
77-70 = D
Poor
69-0 = F
Format/Length
1 inch margins, double spaced, APA format,
Title Page is correct,
Running head,
Page numbers,
At least 5 pages of text.
(20 points)
(18-20 points)
-Paper is correctly in APA style, double spaced, and in10-12 pt. font.
-Title page includes all required elements (Title, name, course, centered), -running head in correct corner.
-pages numbered correctly.
-College level paper.
-Clean, concise, and well organized.
-Flows well, good transitions between paragraphs.
-No run-on sentences or run away paragraphs.
-No grammatical mistakes, syntax errors or typos.
-Content is strong, thesis is CLEAR.
-Length is 5-10 pages.
(16-17 points)
-Correct format and double spacing, 10-12 pt. font.
-Minor problems with the title page such as no running head or missing class number.
-Overall writing ability is good.
-There are a few grammatical mistakes, syntax errors or typos, etc.
-Transitions between paragraphs are a little rough.
-Length 4 pages.
(14-15 points)
-Important information missing on title page.
-Missing multiple components of title page.
-Not double spaced with the font of 10-12.
-No running head. Content of paper in APA with incorrect margins.
-Writing techniques needs some work.
-More than 5 grammatical mistakes, syntax errors or typos, etc.
-Flow of paper is choppy.
-Thesis is poorly identified.
-Writing is hard to follow, confusing.
-Length 3 pages.
(0-13 points)
-Major problems with the title page, set in wrong style, wrong ink, use of BOLD print, or no title page.
-2 to 3 inch margins instead of 1 inch, not double spaced.
-Use of abbreviations or numerals to shorten sentences.
-No professional writing/tone.
-Not college level writing! Numerous grammatical mistakes, syntax errors or typos, etc.
-Less than 3 pages or more than 10 pages.
#2 Category
Excellent/Good 100-94 = A
93-86 = B
Fair (Average)
85-78 = C
Needs Improvement
77-70= D
Poor
69-0 = F
First Person Format: You must be “in character” for the first 5 parts of this paper
(10 points)
(9-10 points)
The paper is written in 1st person format. Steps out of character are appropriate and noted.
(8 points)
3-4 parts of paper are in 1st person format. Steps of character are not clear
(7 points)
1-2 parts of paper are in 1st person format.
-Not clear as to when in character or not.
(0-6 points)
Not in 1st person format.
#3 Category
Excellent/Good 100-94 = A
93-86 = B
Fair (Average)
85-78 = C
Needs Improvement
77-70 = D
Poor
69-0 = F
Symptoms the Person is Experiencing:
(10 points)
(9-10 points)
-All material related to the subtopic, main topic.
-Strong organization and integration of material within subtopics.
-Strong transitions linking subtopic to main topic.
-Full list of symptoms listed.
(8 points)
-All material clearly related to the subtop ...
This data set is a sample of Web server statistics for a computer .docxgasciognecaren
This data set
is a sample of Web server statistics for a computer science department. It contains the following 11 sections of data:
Total successful requests
Average successful requests per day
Total successful requests for pages
Average successful requests for pages per day
Total failed requests
Total redirected requests
Number of distinct files requested
Number of distinct hosts served
Corrupt logfile lines
Total data transferred
Average data transferred per day
Write an essay of 2–3 pages that contains the following:
A complete overview of the data, identifying anomalies in different weeks, and the weeks that the data are not regular.
Choose 5 different sections of data, examine these sections, and provide the specific selection process and criteria you used to select this data set.
Provide the measures of tendency and dispersion for each of the 5 different sections of data you selected.
Provide 1 chart or graph for each of the 5 processed sections. This may be a pie or bar chart or a histogram.
Label the chart or graph clearly.
Explain why the graph you provided gave a good visual representation of the data.
Based on your explanation above, identify some specific advantages why, in general, charts and graphs are important in conveying information in a visual format.
Determine the standard deviation and variation, and explain their importance in statistical analysis of a data set.
Based on the tasks you performed in this project, research how statistics are used in information technology (IT), and provide references for your research
Your essay should include proper citation in APA formatting, both in-text, and in reference pages. Include a title page and use 12-point Times New Roman double-spaced font throughout the text.
This assignment will also be assessed using additional criteria provided
here
.
Please submit your assignment.
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
Grading Rubric
Project Criteria
Exceeds: 90%–100%
Very Good: 80%–89%
Meets: 70%–79%
Needs Improvement: Below 70%
Content
(75%)
Response covers all topics indicated in the assignment and adds additional content. Response covers most topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers many of the topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers none to some of the topics indicated in the assignment.
Effective Communication
(10%)
Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Organization is clear. Format is consistently appropriate to assignment. Presentation and delivery are confident and persuasive (where applic ...
1/21/22, 2:41 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Applications in Cybe…y Management and Policy (2222) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assess…5244&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0
50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 485 6380 Prac!cal Applica!ons in Cybersecurity Management and Policy (2222)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
Use of Authorita!ve
Sources
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Ap ...
1/21/22, 2:41 PMRubric Assessment - CSIA 485 6380 Practical Applications in Cybe…y Management and Policy (2222) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assess…5244&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0
50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 485 6380 Prac!cal Applica!ons in Cybersecurity Management and Policy (2222)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
Use of Authorita!ve
Sources
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Ap ...
11/12/21, 11:04 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessm…5&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0&viewTypeId=3
Close
Print Rubric50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on ...
11/12/21, 11:04 AMRubric Assessment - CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218) - UMGC Learning Management System
Page 1 of 3https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessm…5&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0&viewTypeId=3
Close
Print Rubric50/50 Discussion Par!cipa!on with Cri!ques and Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 413 7381 Cybersecurity Policy, Plans, and Programs (2218)
Timeliness of Ini!al Pos!ng On Time Late Very Late No Submission
Timeliness of Response to
Discussion Paper
Assignment
5 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Sunday.
4 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Monday.
3 points
Posted response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
0 points
Did not post response to topic
assignment before 11:59 PM ET
on Tuesday.
"Short Paper"
(Response to Topic
Assignment)
Excellent Outstanding Acceptable Needs Improvement
Needs Significant
Improvement
Missing or No Work
Submi!ed
Introduc!on
Analysis
Summary
7.5 points
Provided an excellent
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly,
concisely, and accurately
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
6.5 points
Provided an outstanding
introduc!on to the
deliverable which clearly
and accurately addressed
the topic of the short
paper. Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
5.5 points
Provided an acceptable
introduc!on to the
deliverable which
addressed the topic of
the short paper.
Appropriately
paraphrased informa!on
from authorita!ve
sources.
4.5 points
Provided an introduc!on
to the deliverable but the
sec!on lacked some
required details.
Informa!on from
authorita!ve sources was
men!oned.
2 points
A"empted to provide an
introduc!on to the
deliverable but this
sec!on lacked detail
and/or was not well
supported by informa!on
drawn from authorita!ve
sources (too many
quota!ons or improper
paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduc!on was missing
or no work submi"ed.
17.5 points
Provided an excellent
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least three
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
15.5 points
Provided an outstanding
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least two
separate issues and
provided appropriate
examples for each.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
14.5 points
Provided an acceptable
analysis of the issues for
the required topic.
Addressed at least one
specific issue and
provided an appropriate
example. Appropriately
used and cited
informa!on from
authorita!ve sources.
12.5 points
Addressed the required
topic but the analysis
lacked details or was
somewhat disorganized.
Appropriately used and
cited informa!on ...
file.jpeg
file1.jpeg
file2.jpeg
file3.jpeg
file4.jpeg
file5.jpeg
file6.jpeg
file7.jpeg
file8.jpeg
file9.jpeg
Research Report Rubric
Unsatisfactory
Needs Work
Good
Excellent
Report Title
No title or title not relevant to the topic of the paper
(0 points)
Major issues with title clarity, completeness or accuracy
(1 point)
Minor issues with title clarity, completeness or accuracy
(1.5 points)
Report title is clear, complete and accurate
(2 points)
Title Page
Title page is missing
(0 points)
Major appearance or error issues on title page
(1 point)
Minor appearance or error issues on title page
(1.5 points)
Title page has a professional appearance and is error free
(2 points)
Table of Contents
Table of Contents is missing
(0 points)
Major errors in table of contents
(1 point)
Minor errors in table of contents
(1.5 points)
A correct table of contents in the appropriate format is present
(2 points)
Formatting
The paper is not double spaced. The font used is incorrect. Margins and spacing is inconsistent.
(0 points)
Major issues in formatting
(1-2 points)
Minor issues in formatting
(3-4 points)
The paper is double spaced. Times New Roman 12 point font is used. Appropriate margins and spacing are used throughout the paper.
(5 points)
Headings
No headings are used in the paper
(0 points)
Major issues with headings
(1-2 points)
Minor issues with headings
(3-4 points)
Headings are descriptive, parallel and used appropriately
(5 points)
Length
The paper length is inappropriate—less than 1200 words
(0 points)
The paper is very short—more than 1200 words but less than 1700 words
(1-2 points)
The paper is a little short--more than 1700 words but less than 2000 words
(3 points)
The paper is a minimum of 2000 words
(4 points)
Content
The paper reflects little to no understanding on the topic of choice
(0-11 points)
Major issues with understanding or presenting information on the topic of choice
(12-17 points)
Minor issues with understanding or presenting information on the topic of choice
(18-23 points)
The paper reflects understanding on the topic of choice
(24-25 points)
Quality of Information
The information in the paper is not based on careful research, is not appropriately presented, is not technically sound and does not fulfill the report’s purpose.
(0-11 points)
Major issues with the quality of research, presentation or fulfilling the report’s purpose.
(12-17 points)
Minor issues with the quality of research, presentation or fulfilling the report’s purpose.
(18-23 points)
The information in the paper is based on careful research, appropriately presented, technically sound and fulfills the report’s purpose.
(24-25 points)
Clarity
The paper is not clear, easy to read or understand. Significant information in the paper does not directly relate to the topic.
(0-7 points)
Major issues with coherency or readability.
Some information in paper that does not relate to the topic.
(8-10 points)
Minor issues with coher.
Click here to refer to the instructions for the Unit 1 lab tasks.docxvernettacrofts
Click
here
to refer to the instructions for the Unit 1 lab tasks.
The Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) Layer 3 (Network Layer) is one of the layers that perform packet segmentation. The OSI Layer 3 is roughly equivalent to the Internet Layer of the Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) model, and the Layer 4 (Transport Layer) of the OSI model is roughly equivalent to the Host-to-Host layer of the TCP/IP model. The above two layers perform network segmentation. Based on the above information, answer the following questions.
Describe in detail how packets are segmented by the Host-to-host layer (Transport Layer) Internet Layer of the TCP/IP model.
Do all packets arrive at their destination in the order in which they were segmented and transmitted? Why or why not?
Describe how segmented packets are rearranged or reassembled at the packets’ destination to ensure that received segmented packets match the order in which they were segmented and transmitted.
How are errors handled during transmission of segmented packets?
What is the difference between a TCP segment and an IP packet?
Please answer the following questions and requirements to write your paper of 4–5 pages. As you answer each question, you must provide support or evidence that will enhance and empirically prove your answers. Academic information technology (IT) articles or real-life IT findings that are not found in journals or other academic sources must be used in supporting your answers. Please use APA style for all cited sources, including your reference page.
Please include the following elements in your paper of 4–5 pages:
A title page
A report that includes the following:
An introduction to the contents of the report
Detailed explanations about the items listed regarding network segmentation, error handling, TCP segments and TCP packets.
Please cite your references in APA format.
For more information on APA, please visit the library, and click on Citation Resources link.
Please submit your assignment.
Grading Criteria
Project Criteria
Exceeds: 90%–100%
Very Good: 80%–89%
Meets: 70%–79%
Needs Improvement: Below 70%
Content
(75%)
Response covers all topics indicated in the assignment and adds additional content. Response covers most topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers many of the topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers none to some of the topics indicated in the assignment.
Effective Communication
(10%)
Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Organization is clear. Format is consistently appropriate to assignment. Presentation and delivery are confident and persuasive (wh ...
1. Citation Written in APA format. For more help.docxSONU61709
1. Citation:
Written in APA format. For more help with formatting, see APA handout.
1. Summary:
What is purpose of the source, review article, original research? What topics are covered? This is generally 1 -3 sentences that summarize the author’s main point. For more help, see this link on paraphrasing sources.
1. Assessment:
After summarizing the article (or research paper or book) it is necessary to evaluate it and also where you found it – its source (e.g. journal, website, etc). Briefly answer the following questions:
What is the format or type of source. How reliable is the information in the article and how credible is the source and the author(s)? Is this article biased or objective?
For more help, see this handout on evaluating resources.
1. Critique
Once you've summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Why is this source relevant to your research paper and how can you use this source in your research project? What are the strengths and weaknesses? It is biased in any way? Compare the source with other sources in your bibliography.
Source 1- http://www.mslifelines.com/what-is-ms?cmp=M_WhatIsMS_MSLLGuideToMS_Google_PS&gclid=COrwht6_ns0CFdU7gQodi7MHjg
Source 2- http://www.nationalmssociety.org/What-is-MS
Source 3- http://www.healthline.com/health/multiple-sclerosis/early-signs
Source 4- http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/37556.php
Source 5- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1069023/
Assignment 4: Research Paper Rubric
Evaluation Criteria
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Points Earned
Abstract
TOTAL: (15 points)
(10 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Topic Sentence
· Five main topics introduced: Statistics/Epidemiology, Financial Costs, Anatomy & Physiology/ Etiology, Diagnosis/Treatments/ Prognosis,
· Conclusions and Findings, Future Directions/Research
Response to Assignment 3 Feedback
(5 points)
Minimum criteria:
· Did student respond to and fix issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignments 3?
10 points
Abstract contains all of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and briefly presents conclusions.
5 points
Student responded to and fixed issues identified by the instructor feedback for
Assignment 3
~or~ There were no issues in the instructor feedback for the student to respond to in Assignment 3
~or~ Assignment 3 was not submitted by the student
9 - 8 points
Abstract contains four of the required criteria.
Abstract introduces the profile and outlines main topics and presents conclusions.
7 - 6 points
Abstract contains three of the required criteria.
Abstract is lacking in introduction sentence, information, and/or conclusion statement.
< 6 points
Abstract contains two or less of the required criteria.
Abstract is not present. (0 points)
0 points
Student did not address all the issues identified in the instructor feedback for Assignment 3
Main Body Content
TOTAL: (50 ...
THEO 650 Ethics Research Paper Final Submission Grading RubricCr.docxarnoldmeredith47041
THEO 650 Ethics Research Paper Final Submission Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced 92-100% (A)
Proficient 84-91% (B)
Developing 1-83% (< C)
Not present
Introduction
18 to 20 points
There is a clear thesis statement. The topic is identified. The introduction provides a clear overview of the paper’s contents.
17 points
The topic is identified, a thesis statement is provided, and the reader knows generally where the paper is heading.
1 to 16 points
The introduction is minimal, brief, and cursory.
0 points
Content, Argumentation, and Evidence
75 to 81 points
The paper interacts with a specific crucial approach or builds a positive case for an aspect of the resurrection. The paper applies appropriate methods of argumentation and evidences to defend its thesis. The paper approaches the topic logically and does not contain fallacious argumentation.
68 to 74 points
The paper interacts with a specific crucial approach or builds a positive case for an aspect of the resurrection. Argumentation and evidence is given with some depth. The paper approaches the topic logically and contains few mistakes in reasoning.
1 to 67 points
The paper’s topic is broad and does fully meet the requirements for the assignment. Cursory evidence and argumentation is given for main points made throughout the paper.
0 points
Conclusion
18 to 20 points
The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper.
17 points
The conclusion is given and offers a general summary of issues treated in the paper.
1 to 16 points
The conclusion is minimal, brief, and cursory.
0 points
Structure 30%
Advanced 92-100% (A)
Proficient 84-91% (B)
Developing 1-83% (< C)
Not present
Structure and Format
11 to 12 points
There are clear transitions between paragraphs and between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. Headings are properly used throughout.
10 points
Transitional elements are used between paragraphs and sections. The paper generally flows in a logical manner. Headings are generally correct.
1 to 9 points
Few transitional elements are provided between paragraphs and sections. The paper lacks a logical flow. Few or no headings are used throughout.
0 points
Style and Grammar
11 to 12 points
The paper properly uses current Turabian. It has a title page, Proper headings, footnotes, and bibliography are used. The paper reflects a graduate level of vocabulary. Assignment contains fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Minimal errors (1-2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper Turabian format.
10 points
Turabian formatting is used throughout. Assignment contains 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Few errors (3-4) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper Turabian format.
1 to 9 points
Assignment contains 5 or more errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader fr.
THEO 650 Ethics Research Paper Final Submission Grading RubricCr.docxsusannr
THEO 650 Ethics Research Paper Final Submission Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced 92-100% (A)
Proficient 84-91% (B)
Developing 1-83% (< C)
Not present
Introduction
18 to 20 points
There is a clear thesis statement. The topic is identified. The introduction provides a clear overview of the paper’s contents.
17 points
The topic is identified, a thesis statement is provided, and the reader knows generally where the paper is heading.
1 to 16 points
The introduction is minimal, brief, and cursory.
0 points
Content, Argumentation, and Evidence
75 to 81 points
The paper interacts with a specific crucial approach or builds a positive case for an aspect of the resurrection. The paper applies appropriate methods of argumentation and evidences to defend its thesis. The paper approaches the topic logically and does not contain fallacious argumentation.
68 to 74 points
The paper interacts with a specific crucial approach or builds a positive case for an aspect of the resurrection. Argumentation and evidence is given with some depth. The paper approaches the topic logically and contains few mistakes in reasoning.
1 to 67 points
The paper’s topic is broad and does fully meet the requirements for the assignment. Cursory evidence and argumentation is given for main points made throughout the paper.
0 points
Conclusion
18 to 20 points
The conclusion offers a good summary of issues treated in the paper.
17 points
The conclusion is given and offers a general summary of issues treated in the paper.
1 to 16 points
The conclusion is minimal, brief, and cursory.
0 points
Structure 30%
Advanced 92-100% (A)
Proficient 84-91% (B)
Developing 1-83% (< C)
Not present
Structure and Format
11 to 12 points
There are clear transitions between paragraphs and between paragraphs and sections. The treatment of the topic is logically oriented. Headings are properly used throughout.
10 points
Transitional elements are used between paragraphs and sections. The paper generally flows in a logical manner. Headings are generally correct.
1 to 9 points
Few transitional elements are provided between paragraphs and sections. The paper lacks a logical flow. Few or no headings are used throughout.
0 points
Style and Grammar
11 to 12 points
The paper properly uses current Turabian. It has a title page, Proper headings, footnotes, and bibliography are used. The paper reflects a graduate level of vocabulary. Assignment contains fewer than 2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Minimal errors (1-2) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper Turabian format.
10 points
Turabian formatting is used throughout. Assignment contains 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. Few errors (3-4) noted in the interpretation or execution of proper Turabian format.
1 to 9 points
Assignment contains 5 or more errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader fr.
Similar to Module 01 Course Project – Legislative ActionTotal Points Possib.docx (15)
Most women experience their closest friendships with those of th.docxroushhsiu
Most women experience their closest friendships with those of the same sex. Men have suffered more of a stigma in terms of sharing deep bonds with other men. Open affection and connection is not actively encouraged among men. Recent changes in society might impact this, especially with the advent of the meterosexual male. “The meterosexual male is less interested in blood lines, traditions, family, class, gender, than in choosing who they want to be and who they want to be with” (Vernon, 2010, p. 204).
In this week’s reading material, the following philosophers discuss their views on this topic: Simone de Beauvoir, Thomas Aquinas, MacIntyre, Friedman, Hunt, and Foucault. Make sure to incorporate their views as you answer each discussion question. Think about how their views may be similar or different from your own. In at least 250 words total, please answer each of the following, drawing upon your reading materials and your personal insight:
To what extent do you think women still have a better opportunity to forge deeper friendships than men? What needs to change to level the friendship playing field for men, if anything?
How is the role of the meterosexual man helping to forge a new pathway for male friendships?
.
Morgan and Dunn JD have hired you to assist with a case involvin.docxroushhsiu
Morgan and Dunn JD have hired you to assist with a case involving domestic abuse. The evidence is contained on a password-protected laptop that the plaintiff (the wife) indicates will show a pattern of abuse. You have to decide what equipment and software to purchase to assist with the case and safely extract the data from the laptop.
.
Mortality rates vary between the Hispanic community and the gene.docxroushhsiu
Mortality rates vary between the Hispanic community and the general population. Discuss the leading causes of death and illness among Hispanic Americans and the options the Advanced Practice Nurse has to overcome the disparity of healthcare for this population.
The post should be a minimum of 200 words, scholarly written, APA7 formatted, and referenced. Free of plagiarism and gramatical errors. A minimum of 2 references is required (other than your text).
.
Moreno Industries has adopted the following production budget for th.docxroushhsiu
Moreno Industries has adopted the following production budget for the first 4 months of 2013.
Month Units Month Units
January 10,000 March 5,000
February 8,000 April 4,000
Each unit requires 3 pounds of raw materials costing $2 per pound. On December 31, 2012, the ending raw materials inventory was 9,000 pounds. Management wants to have a raw materials inventory at the end of the month equal to 30% of next month's production requirements.
Complete the direct materials purchases budget by month for the first quarter.
.
Most people have a blend of leadership styles that they use. Some le.docxroushhsiu
Most people have a blend of leadership styles that they use. Some leaders are more flexible in applying a wide range of leadership styles, whereas others are more consistent and generally use just one or two preferred behaviors. Consider if two strong individuals begin a new company and discuss the following:
If two diverse individuals, each having a different leadership style, were tasked with effectively co-leading an organization, what potential conflicts might occur between these different leadership styles?
How will their personal leadership styles influence the organizational culture?
How would you recommend that these two leaders work together most effectively?
.
Moral rights as opposed to legal rights are not dependent on a polit.docxroushhsiu
The document discusses various moral and legal rights theories as they relate to issues of discrimination based on sex. It outlines moral rights as distinct from legal rights, and examines several ethical theories that support moral rights. It also discusses key aspects of legal rights, justice theories, Aristotle's theory of justice, and Nozick's entitlement theory of justice. The document provides context and issues for an analysis of whether sex should remain a protected class and the implications of removing legal protections against sexual discrimination.
Montasari, R., & Hill, R. (2019). Next-Generation Digital Forens.docxroushhsiu
Montasari, R., & Hill, R. (2019). Next-Generation Digital Forensics: Challenges and Future Paradigms.
2019 IEEE 12th International Conference on Global Security, Safety and Sustainability (ICGS3), Global Security, Safety and Sustainability (ICGS3)
, 205.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGS3.2019.8688020
Sahinoglu, M., Stockton, S., Barclay, R. M., & Morton, S. (2016). Metrics Based Risk Assessment and Management of Digital Forensics.
Defense Acquisition Research Journal: A Publication of the Defense Acquisition University, 23
(2), 152–177.
https://doi.org/10.22594/dau.16-748.23.02
Nnoli, H. Lindskog, D, Zavarsky, P., Aghili, S., & Ruhl, R. (2012). The Governance of Corporate Forensics Using COBIT, NIST and Increased Automated Forensic Approaches,
2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Conference on Social Computing, Amsterdam
, 734-741.
After reading articles expand on investigation and of digital forensic analysis and investigations. Organizations, especially those in the public, health and educational areas are bound by legal and statutory requirements to protect data and private information, therefore digital forensics analysis will be very beneficial when security breaches do occur. Using this weeks readings and your own research, discuss digital forensics and how it could be used in a risk management program.
Please make your initial post and two response posts substantive. A substantive post will do at least two of the following:
Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
Answer a question (in detail) posted by another student or the instructor
Provide extensive additional information on the topic
Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail
Share an applicable personal experience
Provide an outside source that applies to the topic, along with additional information about the topic or the source (please cite properly in APA 7)
Make an argument concerning the topic.
.
Module Outcome You will be able to describe the historical force.docxroushhsiu
Module Outcome: You will be able to describe the historical forces that have influenced the intersection of race and family in the United States.
Course Outcome: You will be able to describe the historical forces that have influenced the intersection of race and family in the United States.
General Education Competency:
You will have used critical thinking to analyze problems and make logical decisions.
You will be able to demonstrate socialization skills that support cultural awareness and a global perspective.
You will be able to communicate effectively using the conventions of American Standard English in professional and academic environments
What practices did the US government engage in to force Native Americans to assimilate to American culture? What were their motivations? Does this trend continue? Explain. How might this affect the Native American culture in the eyes of Native Americans and non-indigenous Americans alike? Explain.
For a top score, you must respond constructively to at least two other students. More extensive participation will be noted. All of your postings should be spread over three different days.
Introduction: This assignment will assist in your gaining a better understanding of the theoretical perspectives in Sociology
This assignment fulfills/supports
Module Outcome: You will be able to how structural functionalism, conflict perspectives, and symbolic interactionism work together to help us get a more complete view of reality.
Course Outcome: You will be able to recognize and apply the basic sociological terms vital to the understanding of sociology and the major theoretical paradigms to an analysis of social institutions, social structures, and societal issues.
General Education Competency
You will be able to communicate effectively using the conventions of American Standard English in professional and academic environments.
You will be able to demonstrate socialization skills that support cultural awareness and a global perspective.
Demonstrate computer literacy
The Assignment: DF #2 - Theoretical Perspectives
Find a newspaper article, online or physical paper, and identify the structural functionalist, social conflict, and symbolic interctionist view of the social issue that is discussed in the article. Think about how each of these perspectives view society. You can get this from your reading of the text. For example, structural functionalists view society as social harmony with a high degree of social order with the institutions meeting their manifest and latent functions, all for the good of society, compared to conflict theorists, which view society as an arena of social inequality; dominant and subordinate groups, competing for scarce resources. In comparison, a symbolic interactinist may view society based upon symbolic meaning, labeling and social construction and the interaction with others in society.
Prompt:
Write at least one paragraph summarizing your .
Molière believed that the duty of comedy is to correct human vices b.docxroushhsiu
Molière believed that the duty of comedy is to correct human vices by exposing them and mocking them to absurd extreme. He also believed that human behavior should be governed by reason and moderation. In
Tartuffe
, he presents characters who engage in extremely negative behavior driven by passion or emotion rather than reason or common sense. Identify two or three characters who fall into this category and discuss their specific extremely negative behaviors, the consequences of their actions and what that means to you.
.
Module One Making Budgetary DecisionsDirectionsBased on the i.docxroushhsiu
Module One Making Budgetary Decisions
Directions:
Based on the information in the text and the goals and objectives that you have established for the City Bradley Recycling Department, please respond to the following questions in a Word document.
1. Which one of the budgets (line-item, program, performance) best describes what the recycle department does? Explain your answer.
2. Which one of the budgets gives the director of the department/agency, the mayor, and the legislative body, the most discretion/latitude in making decisions about the agency and why? Think about the roles of these persons prior to answering the questions. The response for each entity should be explained separately i.e. Line-Item, Program, Performance).
Rubric Grading you must meet criteria within the 100-90%
PAD 3204 MODULE 1 SUNDAY ASSIGNMENT
PAD 3204 MODULE 1
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of data and assumptions
100.0 pts
You successfully incorporate all assumptions and data from the assignment and include information about average salaries gleaned from the district report card; no apparent errors.
85.0 pts
You incorporate most, if not all, assumptions and data from the assignment and include information about average salaries gleaned from the district report card; one or two minor errors.
75.0 pts
You incorporate some assumptions and data from the assignment and include information about average salaries gleaned from the district report card; a few major errors and omissions.
65.0 pts
You incorporate few, if any, assumptions and data from the assignment; many errors and omissions.
100.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall presentation
100.0 pts
Your discussion of the budget process and individual budget lines is set forth in a clear, thoughtful manner. It is well-written and insightful (writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness); includes thorough details and relevant data and information; and is extremely well-organized.
85.0 pts
Your discussion of the budget process and individual budget lines is set forth in a thoughtful manner. It is well-written (writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors); includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; and is well-organized.
65.0 pts
Your discussion of the budget process and individual budget lines is carelessly written (writing lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors); gives insufficient detail and relevant data and information; and lacks organization.
25.0 pts
Your discussion of the budget process and individual budget lines is poorly written (writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors); lacks detail and relevant data and information; and is poorly organized.
100.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTURNITIN ORIGINALITY SCORE
100.0 pts
<11%
80.0 pts
11% - 15%
70.0 pts
16% - 20%
60.0 pts
21% - 25%
50.0 pts
26% - 30%
.
Monitoring Data and Quality ImprovementAnswer one of two que.docxroushhsiu
Monitoring data over time allows organizations to evaluate programs and make improvements. Collecting documentation allows organizations to track the status of conditions, programs, or decisions. This helps with quality improvement efforts by providing insights into challenges and guiding decision making. However, lack of monitoring limits an organization's ability to properly evaluate programs and initiatives.
Monitoring Global Supply Chains† Jodi L. Short Prof.docxroushhsiu
Monitoring Global Supply Chains†
Jodi L. Short*
Professor of Law
University of California
Hastings College of the Law
San Francisco, California,
U.S.A
[email protected]
Michael W. Toffel
Professor of Business
Administration
Harvard Business School
Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
[email protected]
Andrea R. Hugill
Doctoral Candidate
Harvard Business School
Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A
[email protected]
Version: July 6, 2015
Forthcoming in Strategic Management Journal
Research Summary
Firms seeking to avoid reputational spillovers that can arise from dangerous, illegal, and
unethical behavior at supply chain factories are increasingly relying on private social auditors to
provide strategic information about suppliers’ conduct. But little is known about what influences
auditors’ ability to identify and report problems. Our analysis of nearly 17,000 supplier audits
reveals that auditors report fewer violations when individual auditors have audited the factory
before, when audit teams are less experienced or less trained, when audit teams are all-male, and
when audits are paid for by the audited supplier. This first comprehensive and systematic
analysis of supply chain monitoring identifies previously overlooked transaction costs and
suggests strategies to develop governance structures to mitigate reputational risks by reducing
information asymmetries in supply chains.
Managerial Summary
Firms reliant on supply chains to manufacture their goods risk reputational harm if the working
conditions in those factories are revealed to be dangerous, illegal, or otherwise problematic.
While firms are increasingly relying on private-sector ‘social auditors’ to assess factory
conditions, little has been known about the accuracy of those assessments. We analyzed nearly
17,000 code-of-conduct audits conducted at nearly 6,000 suppliers around the world. We found
that audits yield fewer violations when the audit team has been at that particular supplier before,
when audit teams are less experienced or less trained, when audit teams are all-male, and when
the audits were paid for by the supplier instead of by the buyer. We describe implications for
firms relying on social auditors and for auditing firms.
Keywords
monitoring, transaction cost economics, auditing, supply chains, corporate social responsibility
† We gratefully acknowledge the research assistance of Melissa Ouellet as well as that of Chris Allen, John Galvin,
Erika McCaffrey, and Christine Rivera. Xiang Ao, Max Bazerman, Shane Greenstein, Jeffrey Macher, Andrew
Marder, Justin McCrary, Morris Ratner, Bill Simpson, and Veronica Villena provided helpful comments. Harvard
Business School’s Division of Research and Faculty Development provided financial support.
* Correspondence to Jodi L. Short, UC Hastings College of the Law, 200 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA,
94102, .
Morality Relativism & the Concerns it RaisesI want to g.docxroushhsiu
This document discusses the debate around moral relativism and absolutism. It begins by defining moral relativism as the view that morality is culturally dependent and there are no universal moral truths. Moral absolutism is defined as the view that there are clear moral truths that apply to all people regardless of circumstances. The document then examines some of the issues raised by these perspectives, such as whether judging other cultures is justified and whether progress can be made in ethics. It also discusses forms of relativism that allow for some shared moral purposes across cultures.
Module 9 content You will perform a history of a cardiac pro.docxroushhsiu
You will summarize a case study of a cardiac condition provided by your instructor or from your own experience. You will document subjective complaints, objective assessment findings, and identify any actual or potential risks in a Word document submitted to the assigned dropbox.
Module Assessment 4: TANM ApplicationsBUS2 190
Last name, First name (Section X)
Last name, First name (Section X)
Last name, First name (Section X)
Last name, First name (Section X)
[Please replace “X” with Section 7, 8, or 9. Delete this before submitting]
PROBLEM A: Casper Geriatric Center (16 pts)
1. Is this a minimization or maximization problem? Explain.
2. Is this a balanced or unbalanced problem? Explain.
3. What is the total capacity of Stations 10J and 6G?
4. What is the total demand for Sections A,C,E and F?
5. What is the value of your optimal solution?
6. In your optimal solution, to which sections and how many trays to each of these sections should location 2L deliver?
7. Where will Section D get its meals? How many from each Station?
8. Aside from the obvious deliveries from the factory to warehouses or warehouses to stores, identify and discuss 2 more scenarios on how the transportation model can be used.
Problem B: Good Stuffing Sausage Company (16 pts)
1. Is this a minimal spanning or shortest route problem? Explain.
2. Explain the differences between minimal spanning and shortest route problems. Give an example where each type of modeling can be used.
3. How many branches are there in this network?
4. How many hours will it take to drive through Nodes 2-4-8? Explain.
5. Which arc takes the longest time to travel?
6. Korina thinks the best route is 1-5-6-10. Do you agree with her? Why or why not?
7. What is the value of your optimal solution?
8. What are the nodes included in your optimal solution?
Problem C: 9-31: NASA Missions ( 13 points)
(Hint – your answers in questions 1, 2 and 3 should be a schedule on which mission specialist should be scheduled to which flight. Provide your explanations for your answers) 13 points
1. Who should be assigned to which flight to maximize ratings?
Name of Mission Specialist
Mission Date
Total Rating:
2. NASA has just been notified that Anderson is getting married in February and has been granted a highly sought publicity tour in Europe that month. (He intends to take his wife and let the trip double as a honeymoon.) How does this change the final schedule? Explain.
Name of Mission Specialist
Mission Date
Total Rating:
Explanation:
3. Certo has complained that he was rated incorrectly on his January missions. Both ratings should be 10s, he claims to the chief, who agrees and re-computes the schedule. Do any changes occur over the schedule set in Question 2? Why or why not?
Name of Mission Specialist
Mission Date
Total Rating:
Explanation:
4. What are the strengths and weaknesses of this approach to scheduling?
Science Laboratory Format
Writers in the field of biology must consider not only the form but the style of writing in biology papers.
As in all fields, there are conventions to follow or typical style formats of the discipline.
Writing in the sciences is concise, yet pr.
Module Assignment Clinical Decision Support SystemsLearning Outcome.docxroushhsiu
This document provides instructions for a module assignment on clinical decision support systems. It asks students to search the internet for resources on a nursing diagnosis, summarize three sites based on their content, reliability, and links. It also asks students to locate three cancer screening tools that could be included in an electronic health record and explain how clinical decision support systems could improve cancer outcomes for patients and the benefits of including reminders for providers and patients. The assignment will be graded based on a rubric.
This document appears to be a sample exam for a legal writing course. It includes multiple parts testing students' knowledge of legal research, case briefing, statutory analysis, and a hypothetical legal problem. For the research section, students are asked to identify the type of legal authority for different sources. The case briefing section requires students to analyze an provided case based on key elements. In the statutory analysis, students must answer questions about a provided statute excerpt. Finally, the hypothetical problem asks students to analyze potential legal issues and arguments for different parties based on a fictional case scenario and precedent.
MODULE 8You will perform a history of a respiratory problem th.docxroushhsiu
MODULE 8
You will perform a history of a respiratory problem that either your instructor has provided you or one that you have experienced and perform a respiratory assessment. You will document your subjective and objective findings, identify actual or potential risks, and submit this in a Word document to the dropbox provided.
.
Most organizations, including hospitals, adopt both Mission and Visi.docxroushhsiu
Most organizations, including hospitals, adopt both Mission and Vision Statements. Both can usually be found posted prominently on the wall, and on the organization's website.
What is the difference between a Mission Statement and a Vision Statement? Why would both statements be important as it relates to strategic planning? Are they important in achieving a competitive advanatgae?
Be specific. Thoroughly explain your response.
.
More like this Abstract TranslateFull Text Translate.docxroushhsiu
More like this
Abstract Translate
Full Text Translate
International law is in a period of transition. After World War
II, but especially since the 1980s, human rights expanded to
almost every corner of international law. In doing so, they
changed core features of international law itself, including
the definition of sovereignty and the sources of international
legal rules. But what has been called the "age of human
rights" is over, at leastfor now. Whether measured in terms of
the increasing number of authoritarian governments, the
decline in international human rights enforcement
architecture such as the Responsibility to Protect and the
Alien Tort Statute, the growing power of China and Russia
over the content of international law, or the rising of
nationalism and populism, international human rights law is
in retreat. The decline offers an opportunity to consider how
human rights changed, or purported to change, international
law and how international law as a whole can be made more
effective in a post-human rights era. This Article is the first to
argue that international human rights law as a whole-
whatever its much disputed benefits for human rights
themselves-appears to have expanded and changed
international law in ways that have made it weaker, less likely
to generate compliance, and more likely to produce
interstate friction and conflict. The debate around
international law and human rights should be reframed to
consider these costs and to evaluate whether international
law, including the work of the United Nations, should focus
on a stronger, more limited core of international legal norms
that protects international peace and security, not human
rights. Human rights could be advanced through domestic
and regional legal systems, through the the development of
non-binding international norms, and through iterative
processes of international reporting and monitoring-a model
not unlike the Paris Climate Agreement.
MoreK
0:00 /0:00
HeadnoteHeadnote
Abstract
International law is in a period of transition. After World War
II, but especially since the 1980s, human rights expanded to
almost every corner of international law. In doing so, they
changed core features of international law itself, including
the definition of sovereignty and the sources of international
legal rules. But what has been called the "age of human
rights" is over, at leastfor now. Whether measured in terms of
the increasing number of authoritarian governments, the
decline in international human rights enforcement
architecture such as the Responsibility to Protect and the
Alien Tort Statute, the growing power of China and Russia
over the content of international law, or the rising of
nationalism and populism, international human rights law is
in retreat.
The decline offers an opportunity to consider how human
rights changed, or purported to change, international law and
how international law as a whole can be mad.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, and GDPR: Best Practices for Implementation and...PECB
Denis is a dynamic and results-driven Chief Information Officer (CIO) with a distinguished career spanning information systems analysis and technical project management. With a proven track record of spearheading the design and delivery of cutting-edge Information Management solutions, he has consistently elevated business operations, streamlined reporting functions, and maximized process efficiency.
Certified as an ISO/IEC 27001: Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Lead Implementer, Data Protection Officer, and Cyber Risks Analyst, Denis brings a heightened focus on data security, privacy, and cyber resilience to every endeavor.
His expertise extends across a diverse spectrum of reporting, database, and web development applications, underpinned by an exceptional grasp of data storage and virtualization technologies. His proficiency in application testing, database administration, and data cleansing ensures seamless execution of complex projects.
What sets Denis apart is his comprehensive understanding of Business and Systems Analysis technologies, honed through involvement in all phases of the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). From meticulous requirements gathering to precise analysis, innovative design, rigorous development, thorough testing, and successful implementation, he has consistently delivered exceptional results.
Throughout his career, he has taken on multifaceted roles, from leading technical project management teams to owning solutions that drive operational excellence. His conscientious and proactive approach is unwavering, whether he is working independently or collaboratively within a team. His ability to connect with colleagues on a personal level underscores his commitment to fostering a harmonious and productive workplace environment.
Date: May 29, 2024
Tags: Information Security, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 42001, Artificial Intelligence, GDPR
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Find out more about ISO training and certification services
Training: ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security Management System - EN | PECB
ISO/IEC 42001 Artificial Intelligence Management System - EN | PECB
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) - Training Courses - EN | PECB
Webinars: https://pecb.com/webinars
Article: https://pecb.com/article
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about PECB:
Website: https://pecb.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/pecb/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PECBInternational/
Slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/PECBCERTIFICATION
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
1. Module 01 Course Project – Legislative Action
Total Points Possible
100
Insufficient/Not Evident
Progressing
Competent
Exemplary
Earned Points
Writing is free from spelling and grammar errors. Used proper
writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence
structure, transitions, and punctuation
(5 Max Point Value)
(0pts.)
Paper is not submitted or more than 10 errors in English
grammar and mechanics observed. Proper writing mechanics
were not used.
(1-2 pts.)
6-10 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing
mechanics somewhat used.
(3-4 pts.)
3-5 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing
mechanics mostly used.
(5 pts.)
0-2 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Used proper
writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence
structure, transitions, and punctuation.
Paper meets minimum 2-page length requirement (5 Max Point
Value)
(0 pts.)
Paper is not submitted.
(1-2 pts.)
Paper is less than 1 page in length
(3-4 pts.)
2. Paper is between 1-2 pages in length
(5 pts.)
Paper is at least 2 full pages in length.
Included a memo highlighting the key points of each Legislative
Action.
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Transferrable Skills
Communication:
Discussed the purpose of each legislative action (15 Max Point
Value)
(0-4pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(5-8 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(8-11 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
3. (12-15 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Communication:
Described the problem/problems each action is trying to solve
or prevent (10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Communication:
Discussed other viewpoints or opposing viewpoints of each
action(10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
4. (9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Information Literacy:
Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a
minimum of 3 credible, academic sources. Used proper APA
format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted
material. (10 Max Point Value)
(0-3 pts.)
No sources used. No elements of APA formatting used.
(4-6 pts.)
More than one of the required sources is missing from the
research and/or sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature.
Some elements of APA formatting used. Did not include in-text
citations for paraphrased or quoted material.
(7-8 pts.)
One of the required sources is missing from the research and/or
sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature. Most elements
of APA formatting used and/or did not include in-text citations
for paraphrased or quoted material.
(9-10 pts.)
Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a
minimum of 3 credible, academic sources. Used proper APA
format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted
material.
Critical Thinking:
For the memo, discussed why legislative actions chosen best
coincide with the position and facility that they’ve chosen (10
Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
5. Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Ethics and Professional Responsibility:
For the memo, discussed stance on the chosen legislative
actions and how they impact the core beliefs and ethics of the
organization. (10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Communication:
Writing exhibits appropriate, audience-specific tone and spoke
from an “employee to supervisor” point of view. Vocabulary
tied to the purpose of the research.
(10 Max Point Value)
6. (0-3 pts.)
Writing is inappropriate, does not use audience-specific tone
and vocabulary is not tied to the purpose of the research.
(4-6 pts.)
Writing is somewhat exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not
fully speak from the correct point of view. Vocabulary didn’t
properly represent the purpose of the research.
(7-8 pts.)
Writing is mostly exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not fully
speak from the correct point of view and/or vocabulary didn’t
properly represent the purpose of the research.
(9-10 pts.)
Writing exhibits appropriate, audience-specific tone and spoke
from an “employee to supervisor” point of view. Vocabulary
tied to the purpose of the research.
Communication:
Followed proper memo/business formatting guidelines and use
“block letter formatting (5 Max Point Value)
(0pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate. Didn’t include any of the memo formatting
guidelines
(1-2 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of memo formatting and
business writing guidelines. Some elements were still missing
(3-4 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors. Small elements of
memo letter format and business guidelines were missing.
(5pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows a
complete understanding memo formatting and business writing
rules and guidelines.
7. Total Points
______/______
Module 02 Course Project – The Myths of Lobbyists
Total Points Possible
100
Insufficient/Not Evident
Progressing
Competent
Exemplary
Earned Points
Described the specific interest of the lobbyist in each example
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Included an agenda that discussed each example and highlighted
whether the actions of lobbyists have a positive or negative
effect on healthcare legislation
(10 Max Point Value)
8. (0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Writing is free from spelling and grammar errors. Used proper
writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence
structure, transitions, and punctuation
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Paper is not submitted or more than 10 errors in English
grammar and mechanics observed. Proper writing mechanics
were not used.
(4-6 pts.)
6-10 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing
mechanics somewhat used.
(7-8 pts.)
3-5 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing
mechanics mostly used.
(9-10 pts.)
0-2 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Used proper
writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence
structure, transitions, and punctuation.
Paper meets minimum 4-page length requirement (10 Max Point
Value)
9. (0-3 pts.)
Paper is not submitted.
(4-6 pts.)
Paper is less than 2 pages in length
(7-8 pts.)
Paper is between 3-4 pages in length
(9-10 pts.)
Paper is at least 4 full pages in length.
Transferrable Skills
Communication:
Discussed position on whether the lobbyists’ actions are
positive or negative and supported arguments with details (15
Max Point Value)
(0-4pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(5-8 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(9-11 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(12-15 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Ethics and Professional Responsibility:
Discussed in detail the ethical issues and moral disputes for
each example. (15 Max Point Value)
(0-4pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
10. (5-8 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(9-11 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(12-15 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Information Literacy:
Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a
minimum of 5 credible souces with 3 being academic sources.
Used proper APA format and included in-text citations for
paraphrased or quoted material. (15 Max Point Value)
(0-4 pts.)
No sources used. No elements of APA formatting used.
(5-8 pts.)
More than one of the required sources is missing from the
research and/or sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature.
Some elements of APA formatting used. Did not include in-text
citations for paraphrased or quoted material.
(9-11 pts.)
One of the required sources is missing from the research and/or
sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature. Most elements
of APA formatting used and/or did not include in-text citations
for paraphrased or quoted material.
(12-15 pts.)
Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a
minimum of 5 credible sources, with 3 being academic. Used
proper APA format and included in-text citations for
paraphrased or quoted material.
Communication:
11. Writing exhibits appropriate, audience-specific tone and spoke
from an “employee to supervisor” point of view. Vocabulary
tied to the purpose of the research.
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-3 pts.)
Writing is inappropriate, does not use audience-specific tone
and vocabulary is not tied to the purpose of the research.
(4-6 pts.)
Writing is somewhat exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not
fully speak from the correct point of view. Vocabulary didn’t
properly represent the purpose of the research.
(7-8 pts.)
Writing is mostly exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not fully
speak from the correct point of view and/or vocabulary didn’t
properly represent the purpose of the research.
(9-10 pts.)
Writing exhibits appropriate, audience-specific tone and spoke
from an “employee to supervisor” point of view. Vocabulary
tied to the purpose of the research.
Communication:
Followed proper agenda/business formatting guidelines and is
professional in appearance (5 Max Point Value)
(0pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate. Didn’t include any of the agenda formatting
guidelines
(1-2 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of agenda formatting and
business writing guidelines. Some elements were still missing
(3-4 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors. Small elements of
agenda format and business guidelines were missing.
(5pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows a
12. complete understanding agenda formatting and business writing
rules and guidelines.
Total Points ______/______
Module 03 Course Project –Medicaid and the Middle Class
Total Points Possible
100
Insufficient/Not Evident
Progressing
Competent
Exemplary
Earned Points
Writing is free from spelling and grammar errors. Used proper
writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence
structure, transitions, and punctuation
13. (10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Paper is not submitted or more than 10 errors in English
grammar and mechanics observed. Proper writing mechanics
were not used.
(4-6 pts.)
6-10 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing
mechanics somewhat used.
(7-8 pts.)
3-5 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing
mechanics mostly used.
(9-10 pts.)
0-2 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Used proper
writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence
structure, transitions, and punctuation.
Paper meets minimum 4-page length requirement (10 Max Point
Value)
(0-3 pts.)
Paper is not submitted.
(4-6 pts.)
Paper is less than 1 page in length
(7-8 pts.)
Paper is between 2-3 pages in length
(9-10 pts.)
Paper is at least 4 full pages in length.
Included a one – page information sheet covering the important
information about the Medicare Program
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
14. (7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Transferrable Skills
Communication:
Discuss the purpose of the Medicaid program (10 Max Point
Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Communication:
Describes other viewpoints of the program. (10 Max Point
Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
15. some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Critical Thinking:
Discusses whether the program is effective and offer evidence
to support your rationale. (15 Max Point Value)
(0-4pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(5-8 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(9-11 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(12-15 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Information Literacy:
Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a
minimum of 3 credible, academic sources. Used proper APA
format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted
material. (10 Max Point Value)
(0-3 pts.)
No sources used. No elements of APA formatting used.
(4-6 pts.)
16. More than one of the required sources is missing from the
research and/or sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature.
Some elements of APA formatting used. Did not include in-text
citations for paraphrased or quoted material.
(7-8 pts.)
One of the required sources is missing from the research and/or
sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature. Most elements
of APA formatting used and/or did not include in-text citations
for paraphrased or quoted material.
(9-10 pts.)
Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a
minimum of 3 credible, academic sources. Used proper APA
format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted
material.
Communication:
In the Information Sheet, there is enough information for the
staff to have an educated conversation with a patient about
Medicaid. (10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Communication:
17. In the information sheet, used audience specific language,
clarity of voice, and pronunciation of words. (10 Max Point
Value)
(0-3 pts.)
Presentation is inappropriate, does not use audience-specific
tone and vocabulary is not tied to the purpose of the research.
(4-6 pts.)
Presentation is somewhat exhibits audience-specific tone. Did
not fully speak from the correct point of view. Vocabulary
didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.
(7-8 pts.)
Presentation is mostly exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not
fully speak from the correct point of view and/or vocabulary
didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.
(9-10 pts.)
Presentation exhibits appropriate, audience-specific tone and
spoke from an “employee to supervisor” point of view.
Vocabulary tied to the purpose of the research.
Communication:
For the information sheet, employ formatting features such as
proper use alignment, font and overall design to make a
professional document. (5 Max Point Value)
(0pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate. Didn’t include any information sheet formatting and
business writing guidelines.
(1-2 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of information sheet
formatting and business writing guidelines. Some elements were
still missing
(3-4 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors. Small elements of
information sheet formatting and business guidelines were
missing.
18. (5pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows a
complete understanding information sheet formatting and
business writing rules and guidelines.
Total Points ______/______
Module 04 Course Project – Health Care Reform in Two States
Total Points Possible
100
Insufficient/Not Evident
Progressing
Competent
Exemplary
Earned Points
Describes a minimum of three examples of similarities and
differences in health care reform policies in the two states (10
Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
19. explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Writing is free from spelling and grammar errors. Used proper
writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence
structure, transitions, and punctuation
(5 Max Point Value)
(0pts.)
Paper is not submitted or more than 10 errors in English
grammar and mechanics observed. Proper writing mechanics
were not used.
(1-2 pts.)
6-10 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing
mechanics somewhat used.
(3-4 pts.)
3-5 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing
mechanics mostly used.
(5 pts.)
0-2 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Used proper
writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence
structure, transitions, and punctuation.
Paper meets minimum 4-page length requirement (10 Max Point
Value)
(0-3 pts.)
Paper is not submitted.
(4-6 pts.)
Paper is less than 1 page in length
(7-8 pts.)
Paper is between 2-3 pages in length
(9-10 pts.)
Paper is at least 4 full pages in length.
20. Transferrable Skills
Communication:
Discuss the purpose of each state’s reform (10 Max Point
Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Information Literacy:
Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a
minimum of 5 credible sources with 3 being academic. Used
proper APA format and included in-text citations for
paraphrased or quoted material. (10 Max Point Value)
(0-3 pts.)
No sources used. No elements of APA formatting used.
(4-6 pts.)
More than one of the required sources is missing from the
research and/or sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature.
Some elements of APA formatting used. Did not include in-text
citations for paraphrased or quoted material.
(7-8 pts.)
One of the required sources is missing from the research and/or
sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature. Most elements
of APA formatting used and/or did not include in-text citations
for paraphrased or quoted material.
21. (9-10 pts.)
Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a
minimum of 5 credible sources, with 3 being academic. Used
proper APA format and included in-text citations for
paraphrased or quoted material.
Critical Thinking:
Discusses if Rasmussen Healthcare Systems should expand to
the second state. (10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Ethics and Professional Responsibility:
Discusses in detail some of the ethical issues and moral disputes
in each state’s reform (10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
22. shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Communication:
Included a PowerPoint highlighting the specific policy changes
in each state’s reform/similarities & differences/final
recommendation
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Communication:
In the PowerPoint, used audience specific language, clarity of
voice, and pronunciation of words..(5 Max Point Value)
(0pts.)
Presentation is inappropriate, does not use audience-specific
tone and vocabulary is not tied to the purpose of the research.
(1-2 pts.)
Presentation is somewhat exhibits audience-specific tone. Did
not fully speak from the correct point of view. Vocabulary
23. didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.
(3-4 pts.)
Presentation is mostly exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not
fully speak from the correct point of view and/or vocabulary
didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.
(5 pts.)
Presentation exhibits appropriate, audience-specific tone and
spoke from an “employee to supervisor” point of view.
Vocabulary tied to the purpose of the research.
Digital Fluency:
For the PowerPoint, employ formatting features such as proper
use of design themes, transitions, animation, and photos/clipart
to produce professional presentation. (10 Max Point Value)
(0-3 pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate. Didn’t include any PowerPoint formatting.
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of PowerPoint formatting.
Some elements were still missing
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors. Small elements of
PowerPoint formatting were missing.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows a
complete understanding of PowerPoint formatting.
Digital Fluency:
Used screen capture software such as Screencast-o-matic to
record video. Video captured both the student’s voice and
PowerPoint Slides. (10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
24. Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Total Points ______/______
Module 05 Course Project – It’s All About the Parts
Total Points Possible
100
Insufficient/Not Evident
Progressing
Competent
Exemplary
Earned Points
Writing is free from spelling and grammar errors. Used proper
writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence
structure, transitions, and punctuation
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Paper is not submitted or more than 10 errors in English
grammar and mechanics observed. Proper writing mechanics
were not used.
25. (4-6 pts.)
6-10 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing
mechanics somewhat used.
(7-8 pts.)
3-5 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Proper writing
mechanics mostly used.
(9-10 pts.)
0-2 errors in English grammar and mechanics. Used proper
writing mechanics including proper grammar, sentence
structure, transitions, and punctuation.
Paper meets minimum 4-page length requirement (10 Max Point
Value)
(0-3 pts.)
Paper is not submitted.
(4-6 pts.)
Paper is less than 1 page in length
(7-8 pts.)
Paper is between 2-3 pages in length
(9-10 pts.)
Paper is at least 4 full pages in length.
Included either a memo, agenda, information sheet, or
PowerPoint highlighting the Ryan White Act’s Parts
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
26. Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Transferrable Skills
Communication:
Discuss the purpose of the five Parts in the Ryan White Care
Act. (15 Max Point Value)
(0-4pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(5-8 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(8-11 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(12-15 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Communication:
Discussed other viewpoints or opposing viewpoints of the Act.
(10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
27. (9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Critical Thinking:
Discusses if there is a need for the Ryan White Care Act with
the Affordable Care Act. (10 Max Point Value)
(0-3pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Information Literacy:
Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a
minimum of 3 credible, academic sources. Used proper APA
format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted
material. (10 Max Point Value)
(0-3 pts.)
No sources used. No elements of APA formatting used.
(4-6 pts.)
More than one of the required sources is missing from the
research and/or sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature.
Some elements of APA formatting used. Did not include in-text
citations for paraphrased or quoted material.
(7-8 pts.)
28. One of the required sources is missing from the research and/or
sources aren’t academic or scholarly in nature. Most elements
of APA formatting used and/or did not include in-text citations
for paraphrased or quoted material.
(9-10 pts.)
Included a properly formatted APA reference page with a
minimum of 3 credible, academic sources. Used proper APA
format and included in-text citations for paraphrased or quoted
material.
Communication:
Discusses the reason for the communication format (5 Max
Point Value)
(0 pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate
(1-2 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of key ideas, yet includes
some inaccuracies.
(3-4 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors, is accurate and
shows a clear understanding through appropriate examples and
explanations.
(5 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows an
extraordinary understanding through rich examples and
explanations.
Communication:
In the communication format, used audience specific language,
clarity of voice, and pronunciation of words. (10 Max Point
Value)
(0-3 pts.)
Presentation is inappropriate, does not use audience-specific
tone and vocabulary is not tied to the purpose of the research.
29. (4-6 pts.)
Presentation is somewhat exhibits audience-specific tone. Did
not fully speak from the correct point of view. Vocabulary
didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.
(7-8 pts.)
Presentation is mostly exhibits audience-specific tone. Did not
fully speak from the correct point of view and/or vocabulary
didn’t properly represent the purpose of the research.
(9-10 pts.)
Presentation exhibits appropriate, audience-specific tone and
spoke from an “employee to supervisor” point of view.
Vocabulary tied to the purpose of the research.
Communication:
For the communication format, employ formatting features
appropriate for the format selected to create a professional
presentation. (10 Max Point Value)
(0-3 pts.)
Content was not included or incomplete, and/or extremely
inaccurate. Didn’t include any proper formatting corresponding
with communication format.
(4-6 pts.)
Content shows a basic understanding of proper formatting
corresponding with communication format. Some elements were
still missing
(7-8 pts.)
Content meets criteria with minimal errors. Small elements of
proper formatting corresponding with communication format
were missing.
(9-10 pts.)
Content meets or exceeds criteria, is accurate and shows a
complete understanding proper formatting corresponding with
communication format.