Model Driven Applications using  Visual Studio Code Name "Rosario  Clint Edmonson Architect Evangelist Microsoft http://www.notsotrivial.net
Topics Why should we model? What should we model? How will we model using Rosario? Why is Microsoft investing in modeling?
Quick show of hands Anyone using… Visio Together Altova Rational Sparx Others???
Why should we model?
Customer Problems
Lower Fidelity + Higher Abstraction Design before code – lower fidelity , saves time, money , and avoids mistakes Abstraction level above code Determine difficult decisions before we start building anything Communicate our thoughts to others without making them read the code Why is Microsoft adding UML support now?
Demo Architecture Explorer
What should we model?
Logical & Physical Designs Logical design refers to the class and algorithmic structure of a program Physical design refers to how these classes are packaged into assemblies and deployed
Architectural Frameworks Krutchen’s 4+1 Views of Architecture The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) Zachman Framework
Architectural Frameworks Krutchen’s 4+1 Views
Architectural Frameworks TOGAF
Architectural Frameworks Zachman Framework
Architectural Views As a minimum (think Agile):  Use Case Diagram (Logical) Logical Class Diagram (Logical) Component Diagram  (physical) Deployment Diagram (physical)
Design vs. Realization Should designs be tightly coupled to code?  To the VS project or solution? Our approach is to use explicit designer initiated transformations
How will we model with Rosario?
UML & other DSLs
Our Approach
Demo Use Case Diagram
Demo Sequence Diagram
Architecture Edition April CTP Architecture Explorer UML Diagrams Use Case Diagram Class Diagram Sequence Diagram Component Diagram Activity Diagram
XMI Interchange Support Rational Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Togethersoft Altova Visio
Progress Since April 2008 CTP Architectural Explorer  UX enhancements and lots more Layer Diagram UML Class Diagram Pushing and pulling from .NET Class Diagram Use Case Diagram supports sub-system and doc references Implemented common UML meta-model that all diagrams will use
Why is Microsoft investing in modeling?
Our Goals Broadening the Reach of Modeling
Next Steps Download the September CTP Available later this month Team blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/vsarch Contact the team lead – Peter Provost [email_address] Stayed tuned to my blog for more… http://www.notsotrivial.net
Q & A
© 2008 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation.  Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation.  MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

Model Driven Applications Using Visual Studio Code Name Rosario

  • 1.
    Model Driven Applicationsusing Visual Studio Code Name "Rosario Clint Edmonson Architect Evangelist Microsoft http://www.notsotrivial.net
  • 2.
    Topics Why shouldwe model? What should we model? How will we model using Rosario? Why is Microsoft investing in modeling?
  • 3.
    Quick show ofhands Anyone using… Visio Together Altova Rational Sparx Others???
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Lower Fidelity +Higher Abstraction Design before code – lower fidelity , saves time, money , and avoids mistakes Abstraction level above code Determine difficult decisions before we start building anything Communicate our thoughts to others without making them read the code Why is Microsoft adding UML support now?
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Logical & PhysicalDesigns Logical design refers to the class and algorithmic structure of a program Physical design refers to how these classes are packaged into assemblies and deployed
  • 10.
    Architectural Frameworks Krutchen’s4+1 Views of Architecture The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) Zachman Framework
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Architectural Views Asa minimum (think Agile): Use Case Diagram (Logical) Logical Class Diagram (Logical) Component Diagram (physical) Deployment Diagram (physical)
  • 15.
    Design vs. RealizationShould designs be tightly coupled to code? To the VS project or solution? Our approach is to use explicit designer initiated transformations
  • 16.
    How will wemodel with Rosario?
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
    Architecture Edition AprilCTP Architecture Explorer UML Diagrams Use Case Diagram Class Diagram Sequence Diagram Component Diagram Activity Diagram
  • 22.
    XMI Interchange SupportRational Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Togethersoft Altova Visio
  • 23.
    Progress Since April2008 CTP Architectural Explorer UX enhancements and lots more Layer Diagram UML Class Diagram Pushing and pulling from .NET Class Diagram Use Case Diagram supports sub-system and doc references Implemented common UML meta-model that all diagrams will use
  • 24.
    Why is Microsoftinvesting in modeling?
  • 25.
    Our Goals Broadeningthe Reach of Modeling
  • 26.
    Next Steps Downloadthe September CTP Available later this month Team blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/vsarch Contact the team lead – Peter Provost [email_address] Stayed tuned to my blog for more… http://www.notsotrivial.net
  • 27.
  • 28.
    © 2008 MicrosoftCorporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.