Mic Micro-dissection Testicular Sperm Extraction (Micro-TESE) Dr. Vishal Dutt Gour, MBBS, MS, MCh (Urology) Director, SCI International Hospital M-4,GK-1,New Delhi-48 Learning Objectives Understand the difference between obstructive (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) Overview of sperm retrieval techniques for NOA (micro -TESE) and how to handle testicular sperm for ICSI Learn the success rates and prognostic factors of sperm retrieval in NOA using micro-TESE Reproductive potential of Azoospermic men undergoing assisted conception Azoospermia •It is not a synonymous of sterility Obstructive •Normal sperm production Mechanical blockage Vasectomy, Post-infectious, Congenital Non-obstructive Sperm production deficient or absent Cryptorchidism, Orchitis, Radiation, Chemotherapy, Trauma, Genetic, Gonadotoxins, Idiopathic INTRODUCTION •Microsurgical Testicular Sperm Extraction or “Micro- TESE” has been developed to detect sperm in the testicles of men who have poor sperm production. •Because the testicular tubules are microscopic structures, they cannot be distinguished by the naked eye. •There is a higher chance that he will find sperm in “fuller,” more normal tubules than in scarred or fibrotic tubules. Microscope- why a good one is required Approach •Always plan to follow gradual stepwise approach to retrieve sperm •Percutaneous Semineferous Biopsy 3 to 4 sites using 18/20 G Scalp Vein •Deliver the testis and do a mapping to check •Proceed with Micro TESA •Micro-TESE can be performed as a diagnostic procedure and if usable sperm are found, then they can be frozen and the couple is recommended to proceed with ICSI. •It can also be performed and timed with an egg retrieval/IVF cycle so that the sperm are injected into the eggs without freezing. •Freezing the sperm from men with sperm production problems can be difficult since these sperm are usually few in number and don’t thaw well. •Therefore the best chance of pregnancy is to use fresh sperm obtained just prior to IVF. •The chance of finding sperm with Micro-TESE is better than 60%. This is twice the chances of finding sperm by non- microsurgical or needle biopsies taken by general urologists. Micro-TESE is a great advance in male reproductive surgery, but is only performed by a small number of male reproductive surgeons.