SlideShare a Scribd company logo
MENTAL HEALTH LAW
Legal concepts and the Mental Health 1983 (as
amended 2007)
Psychiatry and Law
 A question of social deviancy
 If I steal, assault or murder I will be arrested, convicted
and imprisoned.
 These behaviours are socially unacceptable
 In mental health the boundaries are less clear
 But the perceived behaviours of those with mental
health problems are generally considered socially
unacceptable
 The Mental Deficiency Act, 1913, allowed local
authorities to certify and institutionalise, generally
unmarried, pregnant women who were deemed
‘defective’, at this time of heightened panic over ‘racial
degeneration’ and eugenic concern about the
perpetuation of ‘unfit’ genes. ‘Mental defect’ was
believed by some to have caused the women’s
‘immorality’...
 Pat Thane and Tanya Evans, Sinners? Scroungers? Saints?
Unmarried Motherhood in Twentieth-Century
England(Oxford, 2012), pp. 24-25
Mental Health Law
 Has worked on the principle that a person with a
mental health problem can be detained, assessed
and treated against their will.
 For those that have broken criminal law and have
mental illness there is the perceived need to
protect the individual and society
 Those that break criminal/civil law society
punishes them by imposing a monetary or
custodial sentence determined by a
judge/Magistrate
 Under mental health law boundaries for detention
are less explicit
 Person detained is not punished but treated
Principle views of Mental Health
Legislation
 Mental health problems can be conceptualised as
an illness – which is treatable
 Society has a moral right and duty to protect the
majority from the minority and to protect those
incapable of protecting themselves
Problems?
 Personal freedoms and right to expression
balancing with rights of the wider society
 Eroding rights and criminalising
 Public pressure to tighten legislation
 High profile cases
 Social and political control – the understanding of
what constitutes an illness
 USSR political dissent as mental illness
 Psychiatrist as agents of the state
The consequence of being seen as
mentally disordered
Civil Libertarianism
Eg Thomas Szasz
Welfarism eg Zito
Trust
As you move in this direction
-Less responsibility for own actions
-Possibility of detention & treatment in interest of own health or safety of others
-Theoretically more mental health resources
Nature of degree of mental disorder
Level of risk to self or others
Resources
0 +
 Where does the MHA (1983 as amended 2007) sit
between the completing ideologies?
 AMHPs, doctors, tribunal and courts are left to
make the decision when circumstances justify
treatment
 For the MHA, mental capacity is not the relevant
test. It is the nature or degree of the mental
disorder plus risk level
 Somewhere upper middle?
How mental health law progressed
1713 Vagrancy Acts – allowed detention of ‘lunaticks’
1774 Act regulating private madhouse
1808 Country Asylums Act
1845 Lunatics Act
1886 Idiots Act
1913 Mental Deficiency Act
1930 Mental Treatment Act – allowed for voluntary admission
1959 Mental Health Act
1983 Mental Health Act
2003 Mental Capacity Bill
2005 Mental Capacity Act
2007 MHA (Amends 1983)
Definitions needed for the Act
 Mental Disorder
 Any disorder or disability of the mind. Section 1(2)
 A list of possible examples set in code of practice (para 3.3)
 The presence of a condition in a manual does not necessarily
establish them as mental disorders for legal purposes
 Excludes by reason only of dependence on alcohol or drugs
 For longer term sections (3,7 or 37) appropriate medical
treatment must be available and identified as to where this
located
 Where the patient has a learning disability (separate
definition) it must be associated with abnormally
aggressive or seriously irresponsible conduct
Does a person have to be treatable?
 No
 Treatability test with the MHA 1983 meant that
someone diagnosed with psychopathic personality
disorder who refuses treatment may not be treatable.
 Now all that is need is the availability of appropriate
treatment
 A person’s refusal to accept treatment can no longer
be an obstacle to detention as long is a treatment is
available
 Is detention treatment?
Criteria for detention (non offender)
for s3
 A) that the patient is suffering from mental
disorder of a nature or degree which makes it
appropriate for him to receive medical treatment
in a hospital
 B) that it is necessary for the health or safety of
the patient or for the protection of other persons
that he should receive such treatment and it
cannot be provided unless he is detained; and
 C) that appropriate medical treatment is available
to him
Civil Admission (Part 2)
Section
Number
Maximum
duration
Can appeal
to MHRT
Can NR
apply to the
MHRT
Automatic
Tribunal
Consent to
treatment
rules?
2
Admission for
assessment
28 days
Not renewable
Yes. Within first
14 days
No – s23 can
discharge but
see s25
No Yes
3
Admission for
treatment
6 months
Renewed for 6
months and the
yearly
Yes. Within first
6 months and
then in each
period
No – s23 can
discharge but
see s25
Yes. At 6 months
and then every
3 years (yearly if
under 18)
Yes
4
Admission for
assessment in
an emergency
72 Hours
Not renewable
but second Dr
can change to s2
Yes. Only
relevant if s4
converted to s2
No No No
5 (2)
Doctor or AC’s
holding power
72 Hours
Not renewable
No No No No
5 (4)
Nurse’s holding
power
6 Hours
Not renewable
but Dr or AC can
change to 5 (2)
No No No No
Section
Number
Maximum
duration
Can appeal
to MHRT
Can NR
apply to the
MHRT
Automatic
Tribunal
Consent to
treatment
rules?
7
Reception into
guardianship
6 months
Renewable for
6 months and
then yearly
Yes. Within first
6 months and
then in each
period
No – s23 can
discharge but
see s25
No No
17A
Community
Treatment
Order (CTO)
6 months
Renewable for
6 months and
then yearly
Yes. Within first
6 months and
then in each
period
No – s23 can
discharge but
see s25
Only if CTO
revoked
Yes
Part 4A
19
Transfer
between s7
and hospital
6 months
Renewable for
6 months and
then yearly
Yes. Within first
6 months and
then in each
period
No – s23 can
discharge but
see s25
Yes. At 6
months and
every 3 years
Yes
25 Restriction
by RC of
discharge by
NR
Variable No Yes. Within 28
days of being
informed
No N/A
135 Warrant to
search for and
remove patient
72 hours
Not renewable
No No No No
136
Police power in
public place
72 hours
Not renewable
No No No No
S2 Form example
Section 2 Admission for Assessment
 Compulsory admitted and detained to hospital for
up to 28 days.
 For assessment or for assessment followed by
medical treatment rather than just observation.
 2 doctors sign recommendation (one must have
special experience in diagnosis or treatment of
mental disorders (Section 12) and one must have
previous acquaintance with the patient.
 Recommendations S2(2):
a)He is suffering from mental disorder of a nature or
degree which warrants the detention of the patient in
a hospital for assessment (or for assessment followed
by medical treatment) for at least a limited period; and
b)He ought to be so detained in the interests of his own
health or safety or with a view to the protection of
others.
S3 Form example
Section 3 Admission for treatment
 Compulsory admitted and detained to hospital for
up to 6 months. If grounds still met may be
renewed for 6 months and after that for one year
at a time.
 2 doctors sign recommendation (one must have
special experience in diagnosis or treatment of
mental disorders (Section 12) and one must have
previous acquaintance with the patient.
 Recommendations state;
 He is suffering from a mental disorder of a nature or
degree which makes it appropriate for him to receive
medical treatment in a hospital; and
 It is necessary for the health or safety of the patient or
for the protection of other persons that he should
receive such treatment and it cannot be provided
unless he is detained under this section; and
 Appropriate medical treatment is available to him.
S2 or S3?
 S2 considered where:
 Full extent of the nature and degree is unclear
 Need to carry out initial assessment to formulate a
treatment plan or to reach a judgement whether the
person will accept treatment on voluntary basis or to
reformulate a treatment plan
 S3 when following met:
 The patient is already detained under S2; or
 The nature and current degree, the treatment plan and the
likelihood of the patient accepting treatment on a
voluntary basis are already established
Section 17A Community Treatment
Orders
 RC should consider the use of CTO in any case
when granting S17 leave that exceeds 7
consecutive days
 Applies conditions that the patient makes
themselves available for examination and any
other discretionary conditions eg ensuring person
receives treatment, prevents risk ro protects
others.
S17 example form
Consent to Treatment
 Part 4 of the Act
 Those patients not covered by Part 4 cannot be
treated without there consent except where the
MCA 2005 or common law would allow this
 Knowing who is covered is vital
 Generally those detained for more than 72 hrs are
covered
 A detained patient is not necessarily incapable of
giving consent. The patient’s consent should be
sought for all proposed treatments which may
lawfully be given under the Act. It is the personal
responsibility of the patients RC to ensure that
valid consent has been sought. The interview at
which such consent was sought should be properly
recorded in the medical notes
 Code of Practice 16.4
Definition of medical treatment
 S145 defines this as
 Nursing, psychological intervention and specialist
health habilitation, rehabilitation and care...the
purpose of which is to alleviate, or prevent a
worsening of, the disorder or one or more of its
symptoms or manifestations.
Does Part 4 apply? This will be:
YES if S2, 3, 36, 37, 38, 44, 45A, 47, 48
NO if S4, 5, 7, 17A, 35, 135, 136 or informal
NO
NO
YES
DO NOT TREAT without
patients consent unless
under MCA or common law
Identify the treatment: Is it for mental disorder?
S58: Meds after 3 Months from
when detained
Not listed in Regs or Act eg meds
before 3 Months
REQUIREMENTS: (either 1 & 2 or 3)
1 consent of patient
2 cert verifying consent by RC & SAOD
2 Cert that treatment is appropriate signed
by SOAD after consult with nurse and one
other professional
TreatDo not treat
Not satisfied
YES
Type of treatment involved?
Form T6 – cert of 2nd opinion (patients who are not capable of understanding
the nature, purpose and likely effects of the treatment.
Form T1 – Cert of consent to
treatment and 2nd opinion
Form T2 – cert of consent to
treatment
S62
 Emergency treatment
 Only allows:
a) Which is immediately necessary to save life; or
b) Which (not being irreversible) is immediately necessary
to prevent a serious deterioration of his condition; or
c) Which (not being irreversible or hazardous) is
immediately necessary to alleviate serious suffering by
the patient; or
d) Which (not being irreversible or hazardous) is
immediately necessary and represents the minimum
interference necessary to prevent the patient from
behaving violently or being a danger to himself or other
Other areas to look at in detail
 All civil sections
 All criminal sections (Part 3 of the Act)
 Identifying NR
 MH Tribunals and Hospital Managers’ Reviews
 The Mental Health Act Commission
Further reading
 Brown, R. (2010) The Approved Mental Health
Professionals Guide to Mental Health Law.
Learning Matters.
 Barber, P., Brown, R. & Martin, D(2012) Mental
Health Law in England & Wales. Learning Matters
 Department of Health (2008) Mental Health Act
1983: Code of Practice. TSO
 A very good website!
 http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Main_Page

More Related Content

What's hot

Medical Negligence (ভুল চিকিৎসায় রোগীর মৃত্যু)
Medical Negligence (ভুল চিকিৎসায় রোগীর মৃত্যু)Medical Negligence (ভুল চিকিৎসায় রোগীর মৃত্যু)
Medical Negligence (ভুল চিকিৎসায় রোগীর মৃত্যু)
drmainuddin
 
Mental healthcare act
Mental healthcare actMental healthcare act
Mental healthcare act
Maimoon Sulthan
 
Ethics In Mental Health
Ethics In Mental HealthEthics In Mental Health
Ethics In Mental Health
Erin Alexander, LPC
 
Medico Legal Aspects Of Prehospital Care
Medico Legal Aspects Of Prehospital CareMedico Legal Aspects Of Prehospital Care
Medico Legal Aspects Of Prehospital Care
Ashendu Pandey
 
3)Medico Legal And Ethical Issues
3)Medico Legal And Ethical Issues3)Medico Legal And Ethical Issues
3)Medico Legal And Ethical Issues
phant0m0o0o
 
Medical jurisprudence
Medical jurisprudenceMedical jurisprudence
Medical jurisprudence
sangeet dhillon
 
Ethical issues in Psychiatry
Ethical issues in PsychiatryEthical issues in Psychiatry
Ethical issues in Psychiatry
Dr. Sriram Raghavendran
 
Duty of doctors medico legal aspects
Duty of doctors medico legal aspectsDuty of doctors medico legal aspects
Duty of doctors medico legal aspects
sarosem
 
Ethics In Psychiatry
Ethics In PsychiatryEthics In Psychiatry
Ethics In Psychiatry
Mohamed Abdelghani
 
Ethics in psychiatry
Ethics  in  psychiatryEthics  in  psychiatry
Ethics in psychiatry
RTK
 
Medical Negligence
Medical Negligence Medical Negligence
Legal, Clinical, Risk Management and Ethical Issues in Mental Health
Legal, Clinical, Risk Management and Ethical Issues in Mental HealthLegal, Clinical, Risk Management and Ethical Issues in Mental Health
Legal, Clinical, Risk Management and Ethical Issues in Mental Health
John Gavazzi
 
[Forensics] laws related to medical practice
[Forensics] laws related to medical practice[Forensics] laws related to medical practice
[Forensics] laws related to medical practice
Muhammad Ahmad
 
Ethics Grand Rounds: Dilemmas in Psychiatric Care
Ethics Grand Rounds: Dilemmas in Psychiatric CareEthics Grand Rounds: Dilemmas in Psychiatric Care
Ethics Grand Rounds: Dilemmas in Psychiatric Care
Andi Chatburn, DO, MA
 
Legal issues in emergency medicine
Legal issues in emergency medicineLegal issues in emergency medicine
Legal issues in emergency medicine
SCGH ED CME
 
Mental health care act 2017
Mental health care act 2017Mental health care act 2017
Mental health care act 2017
Soumya Ranjan Parida
 
Human Rights for Mental Ill
Human Rights for Mental IllHuman Rights for Mental Ill
Human Rights for Mental Ill
Deepak Suwalka
 
Medico legal Scenario Today- Awesome or Worrisome ?
Medico legal Scenario Today- Awesome or Worrisome ?Medico legal Scenario Today- Awesome or Worrisome ?
Medico legal Scenario Today- Awesome or Worrisome ?
Dr.Loveleen Sharma
 
Legal aspects of med prac
Legal aspects of med pracLegal aspects of med prac
Legal aspects of med prac
S A Tabish
 
Medico-legal cases
Medico-legal casesMedico-legal cases
Medico-legal cases
AnjaliPratap2
 

What's hot (20)

Medical Negligence (ভুল চিকিৎসায় রোগীর মৃত্যু)
Medical Negligence (ভুল চিকিৎসায় রোগীর মৃত্যু)Medical Negligence (ভুল চিকিৎসায় রোগীর মৃত্যু)
Medical Negligence (ভুল চিকিৎসায় রোগীর মৃত্যু)
 
Mental healthcare act
Mental healthcare actMental healthcare act
Mental healthcare act
 
Ethics In Mental Health
Ethics In Mental HealthEthics In Mental Health
Ethics In Mental Health
 
Medico Legal Aspects Of Prehospital Care
Medico Legal Aspects Of Prehospital CareMedico Legal Aspects Of Prehospital Care
Medico Legal Aspects Of Prehospital Care
 
3)Medico Legal And Ethical Issues
3)Medico Legal And Ethical Issues3)Medico Legal And Ethical Issues
3)Medico Legal And Ethical Issues
 
Medical jurisprudence
Medical jurisprudenceMedical jurisprudence
Medical jurisprudence
 
Ethical issues in Psychiatry
Ethical issues in PsychiatryEthical issues in Psychiatry
Ethical issues in Psychiatry
 
Duty of doctors medico legal aspects
Duty of doctors medico legal aspectsDuty of doctors medico legal aspects
Duty of doctors medico legal aspects
 
Ethics In Psychiatry
Ethics In PsychiatryEthics In Psychiatry
Ethics In Psychiatry
 
Ethics in psychiatry
Ethics  in  psychiatryEthics  in  psychiatry
Ethics in psychiatry
 
Medical Negligence
Medical Negligence Medical Negligence
Medical Negligence
 
Legal, Clinical, Risk Management and Ethical Issues in Mental Health
Legal, Clinical, Risk Management and Ethical Issues in Mental HealthLegal, Clinical, Risk Management and Ethical Issues in Mental Health
Legal, Clinical, Risk Management and Ethical Issues in Mental Health
 
[Forensics] laws related to medical practice
[Forensics] laws related to medical practice[Forensics] laws related to medical practice
[Forensics] laws related to medical practice
 
Ethics Grand Rounds: Dilemmas in Psychiatric Care
Ethics Grand Rounds: Dilemmas in Psychiatric CareEthics Grand Rounds: Dilemmas in Psychiatric Care
Ethics Grand Rounds: Dilemmas in Psychiatric Care
 
Legal issues in emergency medicine
Legal issues in emergency medicineLegal issues in emergency medicine
Legal issues in emergency medicine
 
Mental health care act 2017
Mental health care act 2017Mental health care act 2017
Mental health care act 2017
 
Human Rights for Mental Ill
Human Rights for Mental IllHuman Rights for Mental Ill
Human Rights for Mental Ill
 
Medico legal Scenario Today- Awesome or Worrisome ?
Medico legal Scenario Today- Awesome or Worrisome ?Medico legal Scenario Today- Awesome or Worrisome ?
Medico legal Scenario Today- Awesome or Worrisome ?
 
Legal aspects of med prac
Legal aspects of med pracLegal aspects of med prac
Legal aspects of med prac
 
Medico-legal cases
Medico-legal casesMedico-legal cases
Medico-legal cases
 

Viewers also liked

Republic of ireland mental health tribunals 2009
Republic of ireland mental health tribunals 2009Republic of ireland mental health tribunals 2009
Republic of ireland mental health tribunals 2009
Anselm Eldergill
 
Mhcb 2013 & critical evaluation
Mhcb 2013 & critical evaluationMhcb 2013 & critical evaluation
Mhcb 2013 & critical evaluation
divyesh2k5
 
PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 2003
PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 2003PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 2003
PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 2003
Amb Steve Mbugua
 
San Francisco VA Mental Health Summit 2016 Presentation by Megan McCarthy
San Francisco VA Mental Health Summit 2016 Presentation by Megan McCarthySan Francisco VA Mental Health Summit 2016 Presentation by Megan McCarthy
San Francisco VA Mental Health Summit 2016 Presentation by Megan McCarthy
Swords to Plowshares
 
Mental health act
Mental health actMental health act
Mental health act
Tihcnas Iruyam
 
Discharge planning 2014
Discharge planning 2014Discharge planning 2014
Discharge planning 2014
kmwall
 
Mental Health Care Bill
Mental Health Care BillMental Health Care Bill
Mental Health Care Bill
Udayan Majumder
 
Indian Mental Health Act, 1987
Indian Mental Health Act, 1987Indian Mental Health Act, 1987
Indian Mental Health Act, 1987
Bhavya Shah
 
New mental health act tanu ppt
New mental health act tanu pptNew mental health act tanu ppt
New mental health act tanu ppt
Tanushree Bhargava
 
Mental health act 1987
Mental health act 1987Mental health act 1987
Mental health act 1987
Dr. Parvaiz A Khan
 
Mental health act ppt
Mental health act pptMental health act ppt
Mental health act ppt
Deblina Roy
 
Mental health acts India -Dr.Samin Sameed
Mental health acts India -Dr.Samin SameedMental health acts India -Dr.Samin Sameed
Mental health acts India -Dr.Samin Sameed
Samin Sameed
 
Admit/Discharge Powerpoint
Admit/Discharge PowerpointAdmit/Discharge Powerpoint
Admit/Discharge Powerpoint
Bates2ndQuarterLPN
 
Patient Admission
Patient AdmissionPatient Admission
Patient Admission
Pam Dacuan
 

Viewers also liked (14)

Republic of ireland mental health tribunals 2009
Republic of ireland mental health tribunals 2009Republic of ireland mental health tribunals 2009
Republic of ireland mental health tribunals 2009
 
Mhcb 2013 & critical evaluation
Mhcb 2013 & critical evaluationMhcb 2013 & critical evaluation
Mhcb 2013 & critical evaluation
 
PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 2003
PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 2003PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 2003
PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 2003
 
San Francisco VA Mental Health Summit 2016 Presentation by Megan McCarthy
San Francisco VA Mental Health Summit 2016 Presentation by Megan McCarthySan Francisco VA Mental Health Summit 2016 Presentation by Megan McCarthy
San Francisco VA Mental Health Summit 2016 Presentation by Megan McCarthy
 
Mental health act
Mental health actMental health act
Mental health act
 
Discharge planning 2014
Discharge planning 2014Discharge planning 2014
Discharge planning 2014
 
Mental Health Care Bill
Mental Health Care BillMental Health Care Bill
Mental Health Care Bill
 
Indian Mental Health Act, 1987
Indian Mental Health Act, 1987Indian Mental Health Act, 1987
Indian Mental Health Act, 1987
 
New mental health act tanu ppt
New mental health act tanu pptNew mental health act tanu ppt
New mental health act tanu ppt
 
Mental health act 1987
Mental health act 1987Mental health act 1987
Mental health act 1987
 
Mental health act ppt
Mental health act pptMental health act ppt
Mental health act ppt
 
Mental health acts India -Dr.Samin Sameed
Mental health acts India -Dr.Samin SameedMental health acts India -Dr.Samin Sameed
Mental health acts India -Dr.Samin Sameed
 
Admit/Discharge Powerpoint
Admit/Discharge PowerpointAdmit/Discharge Powerpoint
Admit/Discharge Powerpoint
 
Patient Admission
Patient AdmissionPatient Admission
Patient Admission
 

Similar to Mh law and an overview to the act moodle (1)

Ethics in psychiatry by gurbinder
Ethics in psychiatry by gurbinderEthics in psychiatry by gurbinder
Ethics in psychiatry by gurbinder
Hi-Techpoint
 
Mental health act 2007 ld
Mental health act 2007   ldMental health act 2007   ld
Mental health act 2007 ld
Richard Griffith
 
Community treatment orders
Community treatment ordersCommunity treatment orders
Community treatment orders
Anselm Eldergill
 
Informed consent, professional negligence and vicarous liability
Informed consent, professional negligence and vicarous liabilityInformed consent, professional negligence and vicarous liability
Informed consent, professional negligence and vicarous liability
Dr. Ravikiran H M Gowda
 
Human rights of mentally ill.pptx 1
Human rights of mentally ill.pptx 1Human rights of mentally ill.pptx 1
Human rights of mentally ill.pptx 1
hariom gangwar
 
Human rights of mentally ill person
Human rights of mentally ill personHuman rights of mentally ill person
Human rights of mentally ill person
kajal chandel
 
Medical records
Medical recordsMedical records
Medical records
ARIF MASOOD
 
Ethical, Legal, and Economic Foundations of the Educational Process.pptx
Ethical, Legal, and Economic Foundations of the Educational Process.pptxEthical, Legal, and Economic Foundations of the Educational Process.pptx
Ethical, Legal, and Economic Foundations of the Educational Process.pptx
CristelAnnVerayoDesc
 
The mental capacity act
The mental capacity actThe mental capacity act
The mental capacity act
Ed Horowicz
 
Ethics Pp
Ethics PpEthics Pp
Ethics Pp
pbradley323
 
legalissuesinmentalhealthnursing-.pptx
legalissuesinmentalhealthnursing-.pptxlegalissuesinmentalhealthnursing-.pptx
legalissuesinmentalhealthnursing-.pptx
ssuser8767171
 
1.5. critical care ethical and legal responsibilities
1.5. critical care ethical and legal responsibilities1.5. critical care ethical and legal responsibilities
1.5. critical care ethical and legal responsibilities
BP KOIRALA INSTITUTE OF HELATH SCIENCS,, NEPAL
 
Advance decisions to refuse treatment
Advance decisions to refuse treatmentAdvance decisions to refuse treatment
Advance decisions to refuse treatment
NHS IQ legacy organisations
 
Autonomy
AutonomyAutonomy
Autonomy
Imran Sabri
 
Admission+Discharge+Rights OF b.SC NURSING PSYCHIATRIC NURSING.ppt
Admission+Discharge+Rights OF b.SC NURSING PSYCHIATRIC NURSING.pptAdmission+Discharge+Rights OF b.SC NURSING PSYCHIATRIC NURSING.ppt
Admission+Discharge+Rights OF b.SC NURSING PSYCHIATRIC NURSING.ppt
elizakoirala3
 
Medical Ethics and Negilgence
Medical Ethics and NegilgenceMedical Ethics and Negilgence
Medical Ethics and Negilgence
shashi sinha
 
psychiatry and law .pptx
psychiatry and law .pptxpsychiatry and law .pptx
psychiatry and law .pptx
sindhubapoo1
 
Salient features of mental health care Act-draft 1 ,.pptx
Salient features of mental health care Act-draft 1 ,.pptxSalient features of mental health care Act-draft 1 ,.pptx
Salient features of mental health care Act-draft 1 ,.pptx
Snehamurali18
 
Legal aspects of nursing philnursingstudent
Legal aspects of nursing philnursingstudentLegal aspects of nursing philnursingstudent
Legal aspects of nursing philnursingstudent
pinoy nurze
 
MHCA2017 NEW RIGHT BASED APPROACH.pptx
MHCA2017 NEW RIGHT BASED APPROACH.pptxMHCA2017 NEW RIGHT BASED APPROACH.pptx
MHCA2017 NEW RIGHT BASED APPROACH.pptx
DR Jag Mohan Prajapati
 

Similar to Mh law and an overview to the act moodle (1) (20)

Ethics in psychiatry by gurbinder
Ethics in psychiatry by gurbinderEthics in psychiatry by gurbinder
Ethics in psychiatry by gurbinder
 
Mental health act 2007 ld
Mental health act 2007   ldMental health act 2007   ld
Mental health act 2007 ld
 
Community treatment orders
Community treatment ordersCommunity treatment orders
Community treatment orders
 
Informed consent, professional negligence and vicarous liability
Informed consent, professional negligence and vicarous liabilityInformed consent, professional negligence and vicarous liability
Informed consent, professional negligence and vicarous liability
 
Human rights of mentally ill.pptx 1
Human rights of mentally ill.pptx 1Human rights of mentally ill.pptx 1
Human rights of mentally ill.pptx 1
 
Human rights of mentally ill person
Human rights of mentally ill personHuman rights of mentally ill person
Human rights of mentally ill person
 
Medical records
Medical recordsMedical records
Medical records
 
Ethical, Legal, and Economic Foundations of the Educational Process.pptx
Ethical, Legal, and Economic Foundations of the Educational Process.pptxEthical, Legal, and Economic Foundations of the Educational Process.pptx
Ethical, Legal, and Economic Foundations of the Educational Process.pptx
 
The mental capacity act
The mental capacity actThe mental capacity act
The mental capacity act
 
Ethics Pp
Ethics PpEthics Pp
Ethics Pp
 
legalissuesinmentalhealthnursing-.pptx
legalissuesinmentalhealthnursing-.pptxlegalissuesinmentalhealthnursing-.pptx
legalissuesinmentalhealthnursing-.pptx
 
1.5. critical care ethical and legal responsibilities
1.5. critical care ethical and legal responsibilities1.5. critical care ethical and legal responsibilities
1.5. critical care ethical and legal responsibilities
 
Advance decisions to refuse treatment
Advance decisions to refuse treatmentAdvance decisions to refuse treatment
Advance decisions to refuse treatment
 
Autonomy
AutonomyAutonomy
Autonomy
 
Admission+Discharge+Rights OF b.SC NURSING PSYCHIATRIC NURSING.ppt
Admission+Discharge+Rights OF b.SC NURSING PSYCHIATRIC NURSING.pptAdmission+Discharge+Rights OF b.SC NURSING PSYCHIATRIC NURSING.ppt
Admission+Discharge+Rights OF b.SC NURSING PSYCHIATRIC NURSING.ppt
 
Medical Ethics and Negilgence
Medical Ethics and NegilgenceMedical Ethics and Negilgence
Medical Ethics and Negilgence
 
psychiatry and law .pptx
psychiatry and law .pptxpsychiatry and law .pptx
psychiatry and law .pptx
 
Salient features of mental health care Act-draft 1 ,.pptx
Salient features of mental health care Act-draft 1 ,.pptxSalient features of mental health care Act-draft 1 ,.pptx
Salient features of mental health care Act-draft 1 ,.pptx
 
Legal aspects of nursing philnursingstudent
Legal aspects of nursing philnursingstudentLegal aspects of nursing philnursingstudent
Legal aspects of nursing philnursingstudent
 
MHCA2017 NEW RIGHT BASED APPROACH.pptx
MHCA2017 NEW RIGHT BASED APPROACH.pptxMHCA2017 NEW RIGHT BASED APPROACH.pptx
MHCA2017 NEW RIGHT BASED APPROACH.pptx
 

Mh law and an overview to the act moodle (1)

  • 1. MENTAL HEALTH LAW Legal concepts and the Mental Health 1983 (as amended 2007)
  • 2. Psychiatry and Law  A question of social deviancy  If I steal, assault or murder I will be arrested, convicted and imprisoned.  These behaviours are socially unacceptable  In mental health the boundaries are less clear  But the perceived behaviours of those with mental health problems are generally considered socially unacceptable
  • 3.  The Mental Deficiency Act, 1913, allowed local authorities to certify and institutionalise, generally unmarried, pregnant women who were deemed ‘defective’, at this time of heightened panic over ‘racial degeneration’ and eugenic concern about the perpetuation of ‘unfit’ genes. ‘Mental defect’ was believed by some to have caused the women’s ‘immorality’...  Pat Thane and Tanya Evans, Sinners? Scroungers? Saints? Unmarried Motherhood in Twentieth-Century England(Oxford, 2012), pp. 24-25
  • 4. Mental Health Law  Has worked on the principle that a person with a mental health problem can be detained, assessed and treated against their will.  For those that have broken criminal law and have mental illness there is the perceived need to protect the individual and society
  • 5.  Those that break criminal/civil law society punishes them by imposing a monetary or custodial sentence determined by a judge/Magistrate  Under mental health law boundaries for detention are less explicit  Person detained is not punished but treated
  • 6. Principle views of Mental Health Legislation  Mental health problems can be conceptualised as an illness – which is treatable  Society has a moral right and duty to protect the majority from the minority and to protect those incapable of protecting themselves
  • 7. Problems?  Personal freedoms and right to expression balancing with rights of the wider society  Eroding rights and criminalising  Public pressure to tighten legislation  High profile cases  Social and political control – the understanding of what constitutes an illness  USSR political dissent as mental illness  Psychiatrist as agents of the state
  • 8. The consequence of being seen as mentally disordered Civil Libertarianism Eg Thomas Szasz Welfarism eg Zito Trust As you move in this direction -Less responsibility for own actions -Possibility of detention & treatment in interest of own health or safety of others -Theoretically more mental health resources Nature of degree of mental disorder Level of risk to self or others Resources 0 +
  • 9.  Where does the MHA (1983 as amended 2007) sit between the completing ideologies?  AMHPs, doctors, tribunal and courts are left to make the decision when circumstances justify treatment  For the MHA, mental capacity is not the relevant test. It is the nature or degree of the mental disorder plus risk level  Somewhere upper middle?
  • 10. How mental health law progressed 1713 Vagrancy Acts – allowed detention of ‘lunaticks’ 1774 Act regulating private madhouse 1808 Country Asylums Act 1845 Lunatics Act 1886 Idiots Act 1913 Mental Deficiency Act 1930 Mental Treatment Act – allowed for voluntary admission 1959 Mental Health Act 1983 Mental Health Act 2003 Mental Capacity Bill 2005 Mental Capacity Act 2007 MHA (Amends 1983)
  • 11. Definitions needed for the Act  Mental Disorder  Any disorder or disability of the mind. Section 1(2)  A list of possible examples set in code of practice (para 3.3)  The presence of a condition in a manual does not necessarily establish them as mental disorders for legal purposes  Excludes by reason only of dependence on alcohol or drugs  For longer term sections (3,7 or 37) appropriate medical treatment must be available and identified as to where this located  Where the patient has a learning disability (separate definition) it must be associated with abnormally aggressive or seriously irresponsible conduct
  • 12. Does a person have to be treatable?  No  Treatability test with the MHA 1983 meant that someone diagnosed with psychopathic personality disorder who refuses treatment may not be treatable.  Now all that is need is the availability of appropriate treatment  A person’s refusal to accept treatment can no longer be an obstacle to detention as long is a treatment is available  Is detention treatment?
  • 13. Criteria for detention (non offender) for s3  A) that the patient is suffering from mental disorder of a nature or degree which makes it appropriate for him to receive medical treatment in a hospital  B) that it is necessary for the health or safety of the patient or for the protection of other persons that he should receive such treatment and it cannot be provided unless he is detained; and  C) that appropriate medical treatment is available to him
  • 14. Civil Admission (Part 2) Section Number Maximum duration Can appeal to MHRT Can NR apply to the MHRT Automatic Tribunal Consent to treatment rules? 2 Admission for assessment 28 days Not renewable Yes. Within first 14 days No – s23 can discharge but see s25 No Yes 3 Admission for treatment 6 months Renewed for 6 months and the yearly Yes. Within first 6 months and then in each period No – s23 can discharge but see s25 Yes. At 6 months and then every 3 years (yearly if under 18) Yes 4 Admission for assessment in an emergency 72 Hours Not renewable but second Dr can change to s2 Yes. Only relevant if s4 converted to s2 No No No 5 (2) Doctor or AC’s holding power 72 Hours Not renewable No No No No 5 (4) Nurse’s holding power 6 Hours Not renewable but Dr or AC can change to 5 (2) No No No No
  • 15. Section Number Maximum duration Can appeal to MHRT Can NR apply to the MHRT Automatic Tribunal Consent to treatment rules? 7 Reception into guardianship 6 months Renewable for 6 months and then yearly Yes. Within first 6 months and then in each period No – s23 can discharge but see s25 No No 17A Community Treatment Order (CTO) 6 months Renewable for 6 months and then yearly Yes. Within first 6 months and then in each period No – s23 can discharge but see s25 Only if CTO revoked Yes Part 4A 19 Transfer between s7 and hospital 6 months Renewable for 6 months and then yearly Yes. Within first 6 months and then in each period No – s23 can discharge but see s25 Yes. At 6 months and every 3 years Yes 25 Restriction by RC of discharge by NR Variable No Yes. Within 28 days of being informed No N/A 135 Warrant to search for and remove patient 72 hours Not renewable No No No No 136 Police power in public place 72 hours Not renewable No No No No
  • 17. Section 2 Admission for Assessment  Compulsory admitted and detained to hospital for up to 28 days.  For assessment or for assessment followed by medical treatment rather than just observation.  2 doctors sign recommendation (one must have special experience in diagnosis or treatment of mental disorders (Section 12) and one must have previous acquaintance with the patient.
  • 18.  Recommendations S2(2): a)He is suffering from mental disorder of a nature or degree which warrants the detention of the patient in a hospital for assessment (or for assessment followed by medical treatment) for at least a limited period; and b)He ought to be so detained in the interests of his own health or safety or with a view to the protection of others.
  • 20. Section 3 Admission for treatment  Compulsory admitted and detained to hospital for up to 6 months. If grounds still met may be renewed for 6 months and after that for one year at a time.  2 doctors sign recommendation (one must have special experience in diagnosis or treatment of mental disorders (Section 12) and one must have previous acquaintance with the patient.
  • 21.  Recommendations state;  He is suffering from a mental disorder of a nature or degree which makes it appropriate for him to receive medical treatment in a hospital; and  It is necessary for the health or safety of the patient or for the protection of other persons that he should receive such treatment and it cannot be provided unless he is detained under this section; and  Appropriate medical treatment is available to him.
  • 22. S2 or S3?  S2 considered where:  Full extent of the nature and degree is unclear  Need to carry out initial assessment to formulate a treatment plan or to reach a judgement whether the person will accept treatment on voluntary basis or to reformulate a treatment plan  S3 when following met:  The patient is already detained under S2; or  The nature and current degree, the treatment plan and the likelihood of the patient accepting treatment on a voluntary basis are already established
  • 23. Section 17A Community Treatment Orders  RC should consider the use of CTO in any case when granting S17 leave that exceeds 7 consecutive days  Applies conditions that the patient makes themselves available for examination and any other discretionary conditions eg ensuring person receives treatment, prevents risk ro protects others.
  • 25. Consent to Treatment  Part 4 of the Act  Those patients not covered by Part 4 cannot be treated without there consent except where the MCA 2005 or common law would allow this  Knowing who is covered is vital  Generally those detained for more than 72 hrs are covered
  • 26.  A detained patient is not necessarily incapable of giving consent. The patient’s consent should be sought for all proposed treatments which may lawfully be given under the Act. It is the personal responsibility of the patients RC to ensure that valid consent has been sought. The interview at which such consent was sought should be properly recorded in the medical notes  Code of Practice 16.4
  • 27. Definition of medical treatment  S145 defines this as  Nursing, psychological intervention and specialist health habilitation, rehabilitation and care...the purpose of which is to alleviate, or prevent a worsening of, the disorder or one or more of its symptoms or manifestations.
  • 28. Does Part 4 apply? This will be: YES if S2, 3, 36, 37, 38, 44, 45A, 47, 48 NO if S4, 5, 7, 17A, 35, 135, 136 or informal NO NO YES DO NOT TREAT without patients consent unless under MCA or common law Identify the treatment: Is it for mental disorder? S58: Meds after 3 Months from when detained Not listed in Regs or Act eg meds before 3 Months REQUIREMENTS: (either 1 & 2 or 3) 1 consent of patient 2 cert verifying consent by RC & SAOD 2 Cert that treatment is appropriate signed by SOAD after consult with nurse and one other professional TreatDo not treat Not satisfied YES Type of treatment involved?
  • 29. Form T6 – cert of 2nd opinion (patients who are not capable of understanding the nature, purpose and likely effects of the treatment.
  • 30. Form T1 – Cert of consent to treatment and 2nd opinion
  • 31. Form T2 – cert of consent to treatment
  • 32. S62  Emergency treatment  Only allows: a) Which is immediately necessary to save life; or b) Which (not being irreversible) is immediately necessary to prevent a serious deterioration of his condition; or c) Which (not being irreversible or hazardous) is immediately necessary to alleviate serious suffering by the patient; or d) Which (not being irreversible or hazardous) is immediately necessary and represents the minimum interference necessary to prevent the patient from behaving violently or being a danger to himself or other
  • 33. Other areas to look at in detail  All civil sections  All criminal sections (Part 3 of the Act)  Identifying NR  MH Tribunals and Hospital Managers’ Reviews  The Mental Health Act Commission
  • 34. Further reading  Brown, R. (2010) The Approved Mental Health Professionals Guide to Mental Health Law. Learning Matters.  Barber, P., Brown, R. & Martin, D(2012) Mental Health Law in England & Wales. Learning Matters  Department of Health (2008) Mental Health Act 1983: Code of Practice. TSO  A very good website!  http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Main_Page

Editor's Notes

  1. If we adopt Szasz’s civil libertarian view, disputes the notion of ‘mental illness’ but concedes it might exist, people should make their own decisions about their treatment as with physical illness. There would then be no need for mental health law. There might be a case of law relating to mental incapacity linked to brain injury, dementia, hereditary genetic disorders etc. A welfarist approach might make the assumption that mental illness is linked to some degree of incapacity eg insight. They would see it as necessary to intervene against someone’s will to protect a person from themselves or for the protection of others.
  2. 1808 4 classes identified 1 dangerous lunatic 2 criminal lunatics 3 pauper lunatics 4 paying patients By 1955 there were over 150000 pts in mental hospitals, if allowed to continue cost would have threatened the viability of the NHS. The 1959 Act intended to reduce the number of inpts. Introduced concept of informal patients who could be treated out of hospital. The drive was largely economic but also embodied the concerns of those dissatisfied with how the mentally unwell were treated.
  3. Controversially drops the exclusion criteria . House of Lords wanted more, government less. These were - promiscuity, immoral conduct, sexual deviancy or dependence on drugs/alcohol. Raises discussion around distinction between behavioural problems and mental disorder. Above were considered behaviour and not MD but now these behaviours could be considered to fall under the Act. Paedophilia would still fall under the Act. See page 10 Brown 2010
  4. Both criteria a) & b) must be met. But confusion often arises around b) note the or statements, all do not have to be satisfied, just one.
  5. If the NR objects, application cannot be made. NR can be displace by county court under S29
  6. S2 must not be used as a stop gap measure because S3 has been blocked by NR! Would then need to apply to displace NR