7 Cs of MEASURING  SOCIAL MEDIA PRSA DIGITAL IMPACT CONFERENCE MAY 6, 2011 1615 M Street, NW; Suite 750  Washington, DC 20036 USA  Tel  1.202.842.1818 carma.com Alan Chumley Senior Vice President @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets
ALAN CHUMLEY, SVP 14 years in the industry Recovering PR practitioner:  ING, Bell Canada  Former Director of Measurement @ Hill & Knowlton Masters in Communications & Culture: Research foci:  media effects & uses, reception analysis, audience studies University-level adjunct instructor of PR measurement LinkedIn early 2006 Blogging / Tweeting since early 2007
ISN’T  IS An emerging / experimental  philosophy / approach / filter / lens through which to look at measuring social media  A high level connected / systems  way of approaching the problem  About communities not an audience More sociologist than publicist  Not a Case Study Not a mention of Old Spice in sight Not a specific ‘how to’ / no one-size-fits all Not focused on widgets or mobile Doesn’t focus on a singular or few social media platforms—looks at all holistically @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets
MEASUREMENT ACCOUNTS FOR  5 / 7  TOP SOCIAL MEDIA CHALLENGES Source:  Harvard Business Review:  the New Conversation:  Taking Social Media from Talk to Action Surveyed 2100 Harvard Biz Review subscribers  @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets Why is this the case? Gap between leap of faith true believers and C-suite’s need for  metrics to validate the time/$?
LOT’S OF TOOLS OUT THERE BEWARE OF THE SILOs    AVOID USING (ONLY) THE NEW SHINEY FREEBIES @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets Would you like your job performance  (read: raise/bonus) to be based only on a  Klout Score, for example?  Isolated / silo’d approach No one tool on it’s own is sufficient—not even one paid tool Have to connect the dots with a more relational, systems approach Don’t tout or shout out about Klout: A blunt counting instrument Ignores context / topical relevance
It’s not coverage It’s not static There isn’t an ‘audience’ of consumers Prosumers not just consumers:  simultaneously receiving, interpreting, co-opting, re-appropriating and creating content It’s more many-to-many dialogue than one-to-many monologue So, traditional off line ways of measuring ‘coverage’ don’t cut it They don’t adequately account for the multi-dimensionality and dynamic nature of a conversation and a community of interest in a network We need to think bigger  REMEMBER:  IT’S  SOCIAL  MEDIA @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets
THINK BIGGER & BROADER  MOVE BEYOND ‘MOMENT-IN-TIME’ or ‘VANITY’ METRICS @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets Systems or Networked Thinking: Interdependent relationships between those in a network Social Capital: Connections within and between those in a social network as a source of civic engagement among a community leading to cohesion; that has ‘value’ Michael Kelly
THINK BIGGER  /  INTEGRATE  /  CORRELATE Think Bigger / Broader Beyond PR’s Historical Silo –social Media’s Pushing us all that Way  Think about all customer-facing touch points Understand PR / Marketing / Business Metrics  Integrate Cross-Discipline Report on the Critical Few Focus on /correlate with Outcomes Close the loop / connect the dots Source:  Weber-Shandwick Measurement & Strategy Practice It’s not a ‘keep-your-job’ or ‘buy-a-pool-with-your-bonus’ report card A data-driven approach / evidence-based communications Source:  Oliver Blanchard, Social Media ROI @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets Michael Kelly
The 7Cs of SOCIAL MEDIA MEASUREMENT  THINKING MORE LIKE A SOCIOLOGIST THAN A PUBLICIST CONVERSATIONS & COMMUNITIES VS. COVERAGE  @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets Counting What some call search, syndication and site; stuff we can count like traffic, popularity, fans, followers, retweets, etc.  Content Analysis that is.  Using content analysis, ideally a hybrid of some automation for volume and speed and human analysts for context, nuance and depth to look for how your brand, messaging, topics, issues, stakeholder voices are portrayed; the inclusiveness, accuracy and tone of the conversations.  Conversations And conversationships recognizing that social media is not strictly another communications channel through which to get word out or reach and influence.  It is more about genuinely engaged dialogue than a simple corporate monologue; not only a vertical, one-to-many conversation between an organization and stakeholders but a lateral, many-to-many conversation among stakeholders.  Cohesion / Capital The extent to which folks are agreeing with you, your position, your brand essences.  The extent to which they are agreeing with each other and coalescing around and advocating a core theme, idea, or some call to action either in support or opposition to your organization’s position.  Community The extent to which a core group of people with common interests are gathering and growing.  Measuring the change in community size, and volume and nature of chatter over time Connectedness A look at how inter-connected the highly engaged/key influencers/advocates are and how centrally located they are in both the network and dialogue.  Conversion Stay tuned.  More to follow.    
THE 6Ps OF INFLUENCE MORE THAN JUST REACH / FREQUENCY  RELEVANCY  @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets Popular  Visible, vocal, has a substantial following, reach.  In-bound links, trackbacks, subscribers, bookmarks, followers, friends, views, listens, saves, downloads, etc. Polarized in tone    Neutrality does little to drive influence way or the other.  A clearly positive or negative view will polarize readers/followers and is more likely to drive cohesion and mobilize advocates and have those advocates coalesce around a core theme, idea, or call to action.     Prolific / Relevant / Frequent    Raw author contribution and # of on-topic, related posts Prominent / Authoritative    Are they an idea starter or spreader; source or spider?  They may be prolific but are they prominent?  Are they highly inter-related, inter-connected, and centrally located in the network?  How engaged is this person’s following in a dialogue?  How much dialogue is there and what is its nature?   Here we need to recognize, though, that authority is contextual and topical.  One might be an authority on PR measurement but not on 18th century Russian literature.  Promoter / Loyal Advocate    How many of the followers/commentators active contributors advocating, endorsing, advancing (or the opposite) your position?  Are they adding links, tags.  Is the nature of the language they are using inter-connective, expanded, clarifying, reinterpreting?  RTs, digs, fans, votes, buzz-ups, up/downloads, shares, likes, invites, favorites, embeds.  (More active than the metrics in popularity) Profitable   (conversion / value) Someone who drives others to some form of value or conversion
‘ REACH SHOULD BE A RELATIVE NOT AN ABSOLUTE!’ NOT ALL CONVERSATIONS ARE RELVANT @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets Everybody Unsegmented fans, followers, etc. The people we really care about Influential Authoritative Advocates Cascaders Wouldn’t you rather ‘reach’ 100% of only those that really matter vs. 10% of everybody? B2B space:  your influential community might only be 400 people
Objectives Visibility Visits Volume Velocity Awareness Message delivery Link love Dialogue vs. Monologue Generate dialogue / comments Feedback Using, sharing, pass-a-long Embedding of interactive content Diggs, Delicious tags, stumbles, etc. Votes Etc., etc., etc.  Campaign Types Push (get bloggers to review / write) Pull  (drive visitors on-line) CSR Product Launch Product Engagement Marketing Blogger Outreach Advocacy Issues Management Community building Customer relations Thought leadership  Executive profiling Etc., etc., etc.  VARIETY OF OBJECTIVES  & CAMPAIGN TYPES  (NON-EXHAUSTIVE) @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets
EXPERIEMENTAL THINKING ON AN APPROACH TO  MEASURING SOCIAL MEDIA AN INDEX IS ONLY PART  (BELOW-THE-LINE)  OF THE ANSWER @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets
COMPONENTS OF AN INDEX ? Based on an assumption that  the components above are drivers of on-line influence, potential action They can be measured individually, but it’s  important to measure them collectively  as they are inter-related  The index is intended as  a measure of potential to influence not actual real  influence—that is another research project all together.  All  components are important (but not equal)  drivers of potential influence on-line   Popularity  +  Relevance  +  Authority  +  Presence  +  Engagement  + Advocacy/Loyalty  + Cascade x  (+/-) Sentiment = Influence Potential @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets
IMAGINE A DIFF’T.  PYRAMID  FOR DIFF’T. CAMPAIGN TYPES / OBJECTIVES  @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets
Each of the above  indicators can be adjusted  to account for different types of campaigns & contexts  The  weights would change .  The scores don’t.  For an organization, new to social media, perhaps they might  only want to establish an on-line presence   So we’d dial or slide the weights of  all but the popularity indicator down to zero   AN INDEX WITH MOVABLE INDICATORS FLEXIBLE ENOUGH TO ACCOUNT FOR DIFFERENT OBJECTIVES @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets Has a significantly scaled back / rudimentary version of this.  This is inspired by but significantly expands on R6 thinking.
INDICATORS DEFINED Cascade Citation analysis / ripple index Network analysis Volume & velocity of message spread across the network Inter-connectedness / inter-relationships among: all Only the influentials Advocacy (active) Are social media users advancing our cause? % containing links % active contributors Tags added Engagement (more coming) Dialogue?  2-way?  How much? How good?  How many commentators?  Repeats?  Nature of the language Network analysis:  inter-connected/related  Entity Presence Present?  Prominent?  Frequent? # of + mentions Competitive share of original post Competitive share of resulting discussion Attribution recognition Authority Of both poster and commentators Idea starters or spreaders? Degree of inter-connectedness / inter-relatedness Connected but respected? How central is the influencer to the network? Following: follower RTs/1000 followers Relevance On topic? Author contribution:  how often / prolific? Topical / textual / temporary Sentiment (more coming) Multi-level, multi-author tone Post-level, theme level, sentence level Gaps  in tone in originating content and resulting discussion Popularity (passive)  ‘ Reach’  ? Voice of the consumer stuff we can count Links, votes, shares, recommends, subscribers, registrations, tweets, RTs, followers, fans, friends, diggs, shares, likes, fav’s, upvotes, buzzups, embeds, tags, wish list saves, forwards, invites,  etc. @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets
It’s a  relative measure of the quality of social media coverage : One post relative to another and over time  Many posts relative to a number of other similar clusters of postings It is a  measure of both output and outtake, but not outcome Output:  how much and how good? Outtake:  how engaged, inter-connected, inter-related, volume & velocity of network / community spread Outtake:  advocacy it does not claim to be a measure of outcome or impact It’s a  proxy for on-line influence ; it’s about  potential to influence to measure actual influence, we’ve have to survey In a  diagnostic, benchmarking  sense the index can help inform an organization’s social media engagement strategy  if tracked over time It’s tactical on the fly for mid-campaign course correction and looking back over the long term It’s strategic looking forward: helps  shape communications recommendations This data can be  correlated with tangible outcomes   This data can be  plugged into a market mix model to show causality …isolate for PR’s unique contribution to the marketing mix.  WHAT DOES THE INDEX INDICATE? @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets
(A QUICK ASIDE ON)  ENGAGEMENT MONOLOGUE OR DIALOGUE? Source:  Olivier Blanchard, Social Media ROI @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets Better Not-so-Good Best Consumers vs. Prosumers But haven’t ‘consumers’ always been talking to one another? Public vs. private conversations Isn’t this a ‘system’ or a network? How could you measure this without a systems / network approach?
(A QUICK ASIDE ON)  SENTIMENT AS MARKET RESEARCH PROXY / PREDICTOR Think here about social media monitoring and analysis as: Real time situational awareness Listening at the  point of need Listening close to  the moment of influence A real-time digital form of or proxy for market research and CRM:  Mining conversations to tease out how people ‘feel’ about products/services/issues/causes and perhaps even:  their intended (reported) behavior and what motivates them to buy, (as cited in the conversations), and  their actual behavior tracked via CRM 2.0 and Web 2.0 analytics BUT!!:  we’re only talking about people online and visible / vocal people online (not the casual lurkers) in public social media spaces @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets Source:  Crimson Hexagon
SO WHAT? WHAT ABOUT  CONVERSION & ROI? 1615 M Street, NW; Suite 750  Washington, DC 20036 USA  Tel  1.202.842.1818 carma.com
WE’RE BACK TO THE PYRAMID   THE TOP THIS TIME @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets
OUTCOMES:  KINDS OF CONVERSION SETTING THE STAGE FOR CORRELATION Conversion to a  tangible  like web traffic, sales, donations, awareness, opinion, usage, brand preference, likelihood to try/buy/recommend.  Could also mean conversion  toward  any  measurable  marketing communication or public affairs, issues, advocacy-based  objective.  Here we could / should also be looking at the extent to which the quantity and quality of  social media activity correlates with these outputs .  @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets Micro  (steps toward destination) Macro (Destination) Usually an intermediate means to an end The end Non-transactional (Engagement) Transactional Non-financial Financial Get to x clicks in a site, spend x time on site, download, lead generated, watch a video, created account, contacted us etc.  Sale, donation, (paid) subscription etc.
2 WEEKS IN THE SOCIAL MEDIA ECOSYSTEM…THEN…YOUR WEBSITE Where were they?  What drove them to your site?  What did they do once on your site?  What are they ‘worth’ to you? @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets
Export Data to Your Web Analytics #of posts by date # posts with x or higher an influence index score SOCIAL MEDIA PERFORMANCE DATA  +  WEB ANALYTICS @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets Or Integrate web analytics into your social media monitoring platform
LEVELS OF LINKING OUTPUT TO OUTCOMES Source:  Olivier Blanchard, Social Media ROI @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets Michael Kelly Level of Linkage Notes Just graph ‘er up Plot # of articles vs. web traffic on a graph Don’t do it No indication of relationship other than lines that might trend together Could be a fluke Correlation “ R score” Some stats  You can do this in excel Pearson’s Product Moment Better Showing there is  some  relationship beyond coincidence Not ‘proving’ media exclusively responsible for sales Causality Heavy duty stats You so can’t do this in excel Sophisticated modeling Market Mix Modeling Multivariate Regression Analysis Best Isolates (statistically ‘proves’) for PR’s unique contribution to the communications mix Ton ‘o data, time, $
UPPERCASE ‘ROI’ vs. lowercase ‘roi’ & Other Return-Offs @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets Source:  Olivier Blanchard, Social Media ROI ROI roi MBA PR Financial Non-financial Macro Micro (not all conversion events are ROI) A mathematical equation that works Usually conceptual only; an equation in words only; can’t actually be calculated; something the industry tosses around too liberally A business metric All-too-often a media or audience metric Direct, clear A loose proxy or an intermediate metric (return on expectation, return on objective, return on engagement)
SOCIAL MEDIA BOOK BAG Social Media Metrics:  Jim Sterne, (@jimsterne) Social Media ROI:  Olivier Blanchard (@thebrandbuilder) Social Media Analytics:  Effective Tools for Building, Interpreting & Using Metrics :  Marshal Sponder (@webmetricsguru) Measure What Matters:  Katie Paine (@kdpaine) Using Web Analytics to Measure Impact of Earned Online Media…: Seth Duncan (www.instituteforpr.org) @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets
THANK YOU QUESTIONS? 1615 M Street, NW; Suite 750  Washington, DC 20036 USA  Tel  1.202.842.1818 carma.com Alan Chumley Senior Vice President @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets
APPENDIX 1615 M Street, NW; Suite 750  Washington, DC 20036 USA  Tel  1.202.842.1818 carma.com Alan Chumley Senior Vice President @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets
How are these changing over time? Might be part of many systems / networks? Linking networks to networks @alanchumley  /  @CARMA_Tweets NETWORK ANALYSIS Source:  K. Ognyanova, UCLA, 2010

Measuring Social Media Prsa Digital Impact

  • 1.
    7 Cs ofMEASURING SOCIAL MEDIA PRSA DIGITAL IMPACT CONFERENCE MAY 6, 2011 1615 M Street, NW; Suite 750 Washington, DC 20036 USA Tel 1.202.842.1818 carma.com Alan Chumley Senior Vice President @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets
  • 2.
    ALAN CHUMLEY, SVP14 years in the industry Recovering PR practitioner: ING, Bell Canada Former Director of Measurement @ Hill & Knowlton Masters in Communications & Culture: Research foci: media effects & uses, reception analysis, audience studies University-level adjunct instructor of PR measurement LinkedIn early 2006 Blogging / Tweeting since early 2007
  • 3.
    ISN’T ISAn emerging / experimental philosophy / approach / filter / lens through which to look at measuring social media A high level connected / systems way of approaching the problem About communities not an audience More sociologist than publicist Not a Case Study Not a mention of Old Spice in sight Not a specific ‘how to’ / no one-size-fits all Not focused on widgets or mobile Doesn’t focus on a singular or few social media platforms—looks at all holistically @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets
  • 4.
    MEASUREMENT ACCOUNTS FOR 5 / 7 TOP SOCIAL MEDIA CHALLENGES Source: Harvard Business Review: the New Conversation: Taking Social Media from Talk to Action Surveyed 2100 Harvard Biz Review subscribers @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets Why is this the case? Gap between leap of faith true believers and C-suite’s need for metrics to validate the time/$?
  • 5.
    LOT’S OF TOOLSOUT THERE BEWARE OF THE SILOs AVOID USING (ONLY) THE NEW SHINEY FREEBIES @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets Would you like your job performance (read: raise/bonus) to be based only on a Klout Score, for example? Isolated / silo’d approach No one tool on it’s own is sufficient—not even one paid tool Have to connect the dots with a more relational, systems approach Don’t tout or shout out about Klout: A blunt counting instrument Ignores context / topical relevance
  • 6.
    It’s not coverageIt’s not static There isn’t an ‘audience’ of consumers Prosumers not just consumers: simultaneously receiving, interpreting, co-opting, re-appropriating and creating content It’s more many-to-many dialogue than one-to-many monologue So, traditional off line ways of measuring ‘coverage’ don’t cut it They don’t adequately account for the multi-dimensionality and dynamic nature of a conversation and a community of interest in a network We need to think bigger REMEMBER: IT’S SOCIAL MEDIA @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets
  • 7.
    THINK BIGGER &BROADER MOVE BEYOND ‘MOMENT-IN-TIME’ or ‘VANITY’ METRICS @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets Systems or Networked Thinking: Interdependent relationships between those in a network Social Capital: Connections within and between those in a social network as a source of civic engagement among a community leading to cohesion; that has ‘value’ Michael Kelly
  • 8.
    THINK BIGGER / INTEGRATE / CORRELATE Think Bigger / Broader Beyond PR’s Historical Silo –social Media’s Pushing us all that Way Think about all customer-facing touch points Understand PR / Marketing / Business Metrics Integrate Cross-Discipline Report on the Critical Few Focus on /correlate with Outcomes Close the loop / connect the dots Source: Weber-Shandwick Measurement & Strategy Practice It’s not a ‘keep-your-job’ or ‘buy-a-pool-with-your-bonus’ report card A data-driven approach / evidence-based communications Source: Oliver Blanchard, Social Media ROI @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets Michael Kelly
  • 9.
    The 7Cs ofSOCIAL MEDIA MEASUREMENT THINKING MORE LIKE A SOCIOLOGIST THAN A PUBLICIST CONVERSATIONS & COMMUNITIES VS. COVERAGE @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets Counting What some call search, syndication and site; stuff we can count like traffic, popularity, fans, followers, retweets, etc. Content Analysis that is. Using content analysis, ideally a hybrid of some automation for volume and speed and human analysts for context, nuance and depth to look for how your brand, messaging, topics, issues, stakeholder voices are portrayed; the inclusiveness, accuracy and tone of the conversations. Conversations And conversationships recognizing that social media is not strictly another communications channel through which to get word out or reach and influence. It is more about genuinely engaged dialogue than a simple corporate monologue; not only a vertical, one-to-many conversation between an organization and stakeholders but a lateral, many-to-many conversation among stakeholders. Cohesion / Capital The extent to which folks are agreeing with you, your position, your brand essences. The extent to which they are agreeing with each other and coalescing around and advocating a core theme, idea, or some call to action either in support or opposition to your organization’s position. Community The extent to which a core group of people with common interests are gathering and growing. Measuring the change in community size, and volume and nature of chatter over time Connectedness A look at how inter-connected the highly engaged/key influencers/advocates are and how centrally located they are in both the network and dialogue. Conversion Stay tuned. More to follow.   
  • 10.
    THE 6Ps OFINFLUENCE MORE THAN JUST REACH / FREQUENCY RELEVANCY @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets Popular Visible, vocal, has a substantial following, reach.  In-bound links, trackbacks, subscribers, bookmarks, followers, friends, views, listens, saves, downloads, etc. Polarized in tone   Neutrality does little to drive influence way or the other.  A clearly positive or negative view will polarize readers/followers and is more likely to drive cohesion and mobilize advocates and have those advocates coalesce around a core theme, idea, or call to action.     Prolific / Relevant / Frequent   Raw author contribution and # of on-topic, related posts Prominent / Authoritative   Are they an idea starter or spreader; source or spider?  They may be prolific but are they prominent?  Are they highly inter-related, inter-connected, and centrally located in the network?  How engaged is this person’s following in a dialogue?  How much dialogue is there and what is its nature?   Here we need to recognize, though, that authority is contextual and topical.  One might be an authority on PR measurement but not on 18th century Russian literature.  Promoter / Loyal Advocate   How many of the followers/commentators active contributors advocating, endorsing, advancing (or the opposite) your position?  Are they adding links, tags.  Is the nature of the language they are using inter-connective, expanded, clarifying, reinterpreting?  RTs, digs, fans, votes, buzz-ups, up/downloads, shares, likes, invites, favorites, embeds.  (More active than the metrics in popularity) Profitable  (conversion / value) Someone who drives others to some form of value or conversion
  • 11.
    ‘ REACH SHOULDBE A RELATIVE NOT AN ABSOLUTE!’ NOT ALL CONVERSATIONS ARE RELVANT @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets Everybody Unsegmented fans, followers, etc. The people we really care about Influential Authoritative Advocates Cascaders Wouldn’t you rather ‘reach’ 100% of only those that really matter vs. 10% of everybody? B2B space: your influential community might only be 400 people
  • 12.
    Objectives Visibility VisitsVolume Velocity Awareness Message delivery Link love Dialogue vs. Monologue Generate dialogue / comments Feedback Using, sharing, pass-a-long Embedding of interactive content Diggs, Delicious tags, stumbles, etc. Votes Etc., etc., etc. Campaign Types Push (get bloggers to review / write) Pull (drive visitors on-line) CSR Product Launch Product Engagement Marketing Blogger Outreach Advocacy Issues Management Community building Customer relations Thought leadership Executive profiling Etc., etc., etc. VARIETY OF OBJECTIVES & CAMPAIGN TYPES (NON-EXHAUSTIVE) @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets
  • 13.
    EXPERIEMENTAL THINKING ONAN APPROACH TO MEASURING SOCIAL MEDIA AN INDEX IS ONLY PART (BELOW-THE-LINE) OF THE ANSWER @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets
  • 14.
    COMPONENTS OF ANINDEX ? Based on an assumption that the components above are drivers of on-line influence, potential action They can be measured individually, but it’s important to measure them collectively as they are inter-related The index is intended as a measure of potential to influence not actual real influence—that is another research project all together. All components are important (but not equal) drivers of potential influence on-line Popularity + Relevance + Authority + Presence + Engagement + Advocacy/Loyalty + Cascade x (+/-) Sentiment = Influence Potential @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets
  • 15.
    IMAGINE A DIFF’T. PYRAMID FOR DIFF’T. CAMPAIGN TYPES / OBJECTIVES @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets
  • 16.
    Each of theabove indicators can be adjusted to account for different types of campaigns & contexts The weights would change . The scores don’t. For an organization, new to social media, perhaps they might only want to establish an on-line presence So we’d dial or slide the weights of all but the popularity indicator down to zero AN INDEX WITH MOVABLE INDICATORS FLEXIBLE ENOUGH TO ACCOUNT FOR DIFFERENT OBJECTIVES @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets Has a significantly scaled back / rudimentary version of this. This is inspired by but significantly expands on R6 thinking.
  • 17.
    INDICATORS DEFINED CascadeCitation analysis / ripple index Network analysis Volume & velocity of message spread across the network Inter-connectedness / inter-relationships among: all Only the influentials Advocacy (active) Are social media users advancing our cause? % containing links % active contributors Tags added Engagement (more coming) Dialogue? 2-way? How much? How good? How many commentators? Repeats? Nature of the language Network analysis: inter-connected/related Entity Presence Present? Prominent? Frequent? # of + mentions Competitive share of original post Competitive share of resulting discussion Attribution recognition Authority Of both poster and commentators Idea starters or spreaders? Degree of inter-connectedness / inter-relatedness Connected but respected? How central is the influencer to the network? Following: follower RTs/1000 followers Relevance On topic? Author contribution: how often / prolific? Topical / textual / temporary Sentiment (more coming) Multi-level, multi-author tone Post-level, theme level, sentence level Gaps in tone in originating content and resulting discussion Popularity (passive) ‘ Reach’ ? Voice of the consumer stuff we can count Links, votes, shares, recommends, subscribers, registrations, tweets, RTs, followers, fans, friends, diggs, shares, likes, fav’s, upvotes, buzzups, embeds, tags, wish list saves, forwards, invites, etc. @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets
  • 18.
    It’s a relative measure of the quality of social media coverage : One post relative to another and over time Many posts relative to a number of other similar clusters of postings It is a measure of both output and outtake, but not outcome Output: how much and how good? Outtake: how engaged, inter-connected, inter-related, volume & velocity of network / community spread Outtake: advocacy it does not claim to be a measure of outcome or impact It’s a proxy for on-line influence ; it’s about potential to influence to measure actual influence, we’ve have to survey In a diagnostic, benchmarking sense the index can help inform an organization’s social media engagement strategy if tracked over time It’s tactical on the fly for mid-campaign course correction and looking back over the long term It’s strategic looking forward: helps shape communications recommendations This data can be correlated with tangible outcomes This data can be plugged into a market mix model to show causality …isolate for PR’s unique contribution to the marketing mix. WHAT DOES THE INDEX INDICATE? @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets
  • 19.
    (A QUICK ASIDEON) ENGAGEMENT MONOLOGUE OR DIALOGUE? Source: Olivier Blanchard, Social Media ROI @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets Better Not-so-Good Best Consumers vs. Prosumers But haven’t ‘consumers’ always been talking to one another? Public vs. private conversations Isn’t this a ‘system’ or a network? How could you measure this without a systems / network approach?
  • 20.
    (A QUICK ASIDEON) SENTIMENT AS MARKET RESEARCH PROXY / PREDICTOR Think here about social media monitoring and analysis as: Real time situational awareness Listening at the point of need Listening close to the moment of influence A real-time digital form of or proxy for market research and CRM: Mining conversations to tease out how people ‘feel’ about products/services/issues/causes and perhaps even: their intended (reported) behavior and what motivates them to buy, (as cited in the conversations), and their actual behavior tracked via CRM 2.0 and Web 2.0 analytics BUT!!: we’re only talking about people online and visible / vocal people online (not the casual lurkers) in public social media spaces @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets Source: Crimson Hexagon
  • 21.
    SO WHAT? WHATABOUT CONVERSION & ROI? 1615 M Street, NW; Suite 750 Washington, DC 20036 USA Tel 1.202.842.1818 carma.com
  • 22.
    WE’RE BACK TOTHE PYRAMID THE TOP THIS TIME @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets
  • 23.
    OUTCOMES: KINDSOF CONVERSION SETTING THE STAGE FOR CORRELATION Conversion to a tangible like web traffic, sales, donations, awareness, opinion, usage, brand preference, likelihood to try/buy/recommend. Could also mean conversion toward any measurable marketing communication or public affairs, issues, advocacy-based objective. Here we could / should also be looking at the extent to which the quantity and quality of social media activity correlates with these outputs . @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets Micro (steps toward destination) Macro (Destination) Usually an intermediate means to an end The end Non-transactional (Engagement) Transactional Non-financial Financial Get to x clicks in a site, spend x time on site, download, lead generated, watch a video, created account, contacted us etc. Sale, donation, (paid) subscription etc.
  • 24.
    2 WEEKS INTHE SOCIAL MEDIA ECOSYSTEM…THEN…YOUR WEBSITE Where were they? What drove them to your site? What did they do once on your site? What are they ‘worth’ to you? @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets
  • 25.
    Export Data toYour Web Analytics #of posts by date # posts with x or higher an influence index score SOCIAL MEDIA PERFORMANCE DATA + WEB ANALYTICS @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets Or Integrate web analytics into your social media monitoring platform
  • 26.
    LEVELS OF LINKINGOUTPUT TO OUTCOMES Source: Olivier Blanchard, Social Media ROI @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets Michael Kelly Level of Linkage Notes Just graph ‘er up Plot # of articles vs. web traffic on a graph Don’t do it No indication of relationship other than lines that might trend together Could be a fluke Correlation “ R score” Some stats You can do this in excel Pearson’s Product Moment Better Showing there is some relationship beyond coincidence Not ‘proving’ media exclusively responsible for sales Causality Heavy duty stats You so can’t do this in excel Sophisticated modeling Market Mix Modeling Multivariate Regression Analysis Best Isolates (statistically ‘proves’) for PR’s unique contribution to the communications mix Ton ‘o data, time, $
  • 27.
    UPPERCASE ‘ROI’ vs.lowercase ‘roi’ & Other Return-Offs @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets Source: Olivier Blanchard, Social Media ROI ROI roi MBA PR Financial Non-financial Macro Micro (not all conversion events are ROI) A mathematical equation that works Usually conceptual only; an equation in words only; can’t actually be calculated; something the industry tosses around too liberally A business metric All-too-often a media or audience metric Direct, clear A loose proxy or an intermediate metric (return on expectation, return on objective, return on engagement)
  • 28.
    SOCIAL MEDIA BOOKBAG Social Media Metrics: Jim Sterne, (@jimsterne) Social Media ROI: Olivier Blanchard (@thebrandbuilder) Social Media Analytics: Effective Tools for Building, Interpreting & Using Metrics : Marshal Sponder (@webmetricsguru) Measure What Matters: Katie Paine (@kdpaine) Using Web Analytics to Measure Impact of Earned Online Media…: Seth Duncan (www.instituteforpr.org) @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets
  • 29.
    THANK YOU QUESTIONS?1615 M Street, NW; Suite 750 Washington, DC 20036 USA Tel 1.202.842.1818 carma.com Alan Chumley Senior Vice President @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets
  • 30.
    APPENDIX 1615 MStreet, NW; Suite 750 Washington, DC 20036 USA Tel 1.202.842.1818 carma.com Alan Chumley Senior Vice President @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets
  • 31.
    How are thesechanging over time? Might be part of many systems / networks? Linking networks to networks @alanchumley / @CARMA_Tweets NETWORK ANALYSIS Source: K. Ognyanova, UCLA, 2010

Editor's Notes

  • #32 Are they an idea starter or spreader; source or spider?  They may be prolific but are they prominent?  Are they highly inter-related, inter-connected, and centrally located in the network?  How engaged is this person’s following in a dialogue?  Topicality Here we need to recognize, though, that authority is contextual and topical.  One might be an authority on PR measurement but not on 18th century Russian literature.