SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 30
Download to read offline
Extending Success:
Defining and Evaluating
Excellence in The Met
Community School
Extended Day Programming
Mateus Baptista, Lauren Combs, Jesse DeLauder, Gretchen Mills
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Agenda
Context
Research
Question
Literature
Design
Methods
Analysis
Findings
Recommendations
Wednesday, July 30, 14
MCS
The Met Community School
Mandatory extended day for 9th
grade students
Diverse programming
Experiential learning
Founded in 2003
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Community
Learning Centers
“In 1994, Congress authorized the 21st Century
Community Learning Centers (21st Century)
program to open up schools for broader use by
their communities. In 1998, the program was
refocused on providing academic, enrichment, and
recreational activities in public schools during
the after-school hours (centers also could be open
before school, on weekends, and during the
summer). The program grew from an appropriation
of $40 million in 1998 to $1 billion in 2002, where it
has remained.” (U.S. DOE, 2005)
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Research Question
How can the MCS
extended day program
measure and track
progress towards
their internal goals?
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Q1:What are the
perceived goals of MCS?
Q2: Comparison of MCS
program qualities with
those of high-performing
after school programs
Q3: What are available
indicators of success
within MCS?
How can the
MCS extended
day program
measure and
track progress
towards their
internal
goals?
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Literature
Qualities of similar high-
performing after-school and
extended day program
Successful evaluation of
after-school and
extended day programs
Methods of research
and evaluation
The Met in
Context
Research Design
Analysis
Findings
Recommendations
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Qualitative
Quantitative
Interviews
with students,
administrators,
and extended
day providers
Follow up
questionnaire
Design
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Methods
Interviews Questionnaire
N=11 (Two admin, five student, four provider)
Convenience Sample
Purpose:
1) Address how extended day
goals are perceived
2) Compare MCS qualities to
those of existing programs
3) Identify available indicators
of success
Purpose:
Measure perceived program
success towards three MCS
goals
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Goals
MCS Goals According to Director
Safety
College and
Career Readiness
Social and
Emotional Learning
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Methods
Interview Protocol - Providers and Administrators
Purpose: We are a research team interested in helping the MCS design an internal evaluation system. To do this, we
would like to hear about your personal experience with the extended day program.
You will not be identified by your responses, and they will remain confidential—only to be accessed by our four-person
research team.
Is it ok if we record this interview?
1. Please describe your role in the extended day program.
2. What do you see as the goals of the extended day program?
3. How do you know if the extended day program is meeting these goals?
5. What do you see are the strengths and weaknesses of the program?
6. How do you communicate to other staff/teachers within the program? How do you record challenges or successes for
yourself?
7. Are there formal or informal opportunities for parental engagement?
8. How long have you worked at MCS?
9. What ethnicity do you identify with?
10. Is there anything else you would like to share that you have not yet had a chance to share?
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Methods
Interview Protocol - Student
Purpose: We are a research team interested in helping the MCS design an internal evaluation system. To do this, we would
like to hear about your personal experience with the extended day program.
You will not be identified by your responses, and they will remain confidential—only to be accessed by our four-person
research team.
Is it ok if we record this interview?
1. Tell us about your experience with the extended day program at MCS.
2. Do you think it is important to have a program like this here in your community?
3. Did you continue on in the extended day program past 9th grade? Why did you do so?
4. How has the program affected your academics? Social life?
5. How is the program similar to what you do at school? How is it different?
6. What would you be doing after school if you weren’t coming to the program?
7. What is your favorite and least favorite part of the extended day program?
8. Do you have any ideas to make the extended day program better?
9. Do people listen when you have an opinion or concern about the extended day program?
10. Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
11. What ethnicity do you identify with?
12. What grade are you in?
13. How many years have you attended the extended day program?
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Methods
Follow-Up Questionnaire
The Met Community School strives to provide its students with a safe
environment, opportunities for social/emotional learning, and the skills
necessary to succeed in college and career. To what extent do you think the
extended day program is successful in achieving these goals?
Safety
College and Career
Readiness
Social/Emotional
Learning
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
Not at all
successful
Somewhat
successful
Very
successful
Completed in private by ten of twelve interviewees and returned
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Analysis
5) Questionnaire: measures of
central tendency
Qualitative
Quantitative
Subgoals
Qualities
Indicators
Q1
Q2
Q3
Subgoals
Qualities
Indicators
Subgoals
Qualities
Indicators
Safety
College/Career
Readiness
Social/Emotional
Learning
4) Post Coding: Frequency counts
1) Transcribe Interviews
2) Initial Coding - General
3) Final Coding - Categorical
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Codes
Room for Improvement
Low participation
Disconnect between provider & admin
Disorganization
Add programs
Mandatory for all grades
No student input
College/Career
Readiness
Multiple Pathways
Extend Learning Times
Academic Programming
Build Job Skills
Networking
MCS Connection to Met
School
Internships
Need for MCS Administration & Organization
Professional Development Opportunities
Internal Assessments
Staff Supports
Diversity of Programs
Formal/Informal Family Engagement
Staff Accountability
School/Community Partnerships
Provider Anxiety
Safety
Keep Kids Out of Trouble
Participation
Attendance
Safe Environment
Curb Delinquent
Behavior
Social/Emotional
Learning
Formal Student Leadership
Opportunities
Emotional Growth
Peer Relationships
Mentoring
Student Engagement
Finding your Passion
Informal Student Leadership
Opportunities
Enrichment Opportunities
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Findings
Subquestion #1: What are the perceived goals of
MCS?
When asked “what do you feel are the goals of the
extended day program?” administrators and providers
responded...
*Students were asked, “Do you think it’s important to have a program like MCS in your community? If so, why?”
Q1
GoalCodes
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Findings
MCS Qualities and Indicators by Goal
Q1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Frequency
Talking About MCS Goals
SAFETY
Participation
Attendance
Safe Environment
Curb Delinquent
Behavior
COLLEGE AND CAREER
READINESS
Academic Programming
Build Job Skills
Networking
MCS Connection to Met
Vocational Training/
Internships
SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL
LEARNING
Student Leadership
Emotional Growth
Peer Relationships
Mentoring
Student Engagement
Enrichment Opportunities
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Findings
Perceived Success by Goal
Q1
4.7
4
4.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Safety College and Career Readiness Social-Emotional Learning
Perceived Success Toward MCS Goals
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Quality:
A feature or component of
a high performing after-
school program.
Subquestion #2: Comparison of MCS
program qualities with those of high-
performing after school programs
AnalysisQ2
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Grounded
Theory
Top-DownAcademic
programming
Enrichment
programming
Fostering relationships
Safe environment
Diversity of programs
Participation
School community
partnerships
Connection to school
Family engagement
strategies
Student
leadership
opportunities
Internal
evaluation
Staff supports
Experienced
leadership
Vocational
Training and
Internships
AnalysisQ2
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Findings
Comparison of MCS program qualities
with those of high-performing after-school
programs
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
SAFETY
COLLEGE & CAREER READINESS
SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL LEARNING
N/A
Q2
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Indicator:
“A set of statements about activities
and behavior that can be used to
measure the extent to which after-
school programs are providing high-
quality opportunities for
participants.” (Providence After
School Alliance)
Subquestion #3: What are available
indicators of success within MCS?
AnalysisQ3
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Analysis
What are available indicators of success
within MCS?
When asked about measuring success and positive outcomes,
administrators, students, and providers mentioned...
Attendance
Delinquent behavior
Mentorship
Student showcase
Feelings towards
school
Networking
Building job skills
Peer relationships
Emotional growth
Student empowerment
Q3
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Findings
Indicators for Evaluation
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
SAFETY
COLLEGE & CAREER READINESS
SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL LEARNING
Q3
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Recommendations
Goals for MCS
MCS should set
clear goals that
are communicated
program-wide.
Recommendation:
Mission statement
Finding:
Emergent goals
were informed
by the three
stated goals, but
interviewees did
not have a clear
goal framework.
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Recommendations
Stated Goals from
Director
Emergent Goals
Qualities
Indicators
Evaluation of MCS
programming
should be
informed by
emergent goals
and best practices,
using the
appropriate stated
indicators.
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Recommendations
Emerging
Goals
Qualities Indicators
Social/Emotional
Learning
Find your passion
Enrichment
opportunities
College/Career
Readiness
Extend classroom
learning
Safety
Foster relationships
Diversity of enrichment
programs
Student Leadership
(formal and informal)
Academic programming
Internships
Connection to Met
Trying something new
Mentoring
Peer relationships
Emotional growth
Student engagement
Networking
Job skills
Feelings towards
schools
Student showcase
Participation
Safe environment
Delinquent behavior
Attendance
Evaluation
Measurements
Expectancy of success
Effectance motivation
Evaluation of students
by provider and mentor
Focus groups
Longitudinal research of
college enrollment, job
placement, and program
satisfaction
Drop out rates
Graduation rates
Student pre- and post- tests
Assessment of student
showcase
Attendance records
Student pre- and
post- tests
Focus groups
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Limitations
Self- and organization-preservation bias
Limits of internal validity
Limited pre-existing data
Convenience sampling
Limits of external validity: unique
situation
Summer Program
Small sample size
Wednesday, July 30, 14
Next Steps
3)Study on the overarching
community effects
1)
Study
performed
during
extended day
programming
2) Design
evaluation tools
Wednesday, July 30, 14
“So the strengths are just opening up so many
doors of opportunity for these kids [who] may
come from a background where they felt they
wouldn’t amount to anything. Or they always
could but they didn’t know how. It’s opening
these doors so they can see which direction
they may want to go, or figure out something
about themselves they didn’t know.
It’s just self-discovery.”
-Provider & Former Student
Wednesday, July 30, 14

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Classificacoes_1categ_nacional_2010_2011
Classificacoes_1categ_nacional_2010_2011Classificacoes_1categ_nacional_2010_2011
Classificacoes_1categ_nacional_2010_2011NAFLIS
 
Поллиноз. Этиология. Патогенез. Клиника. Диагностика. Лечение
Поллиноз. Этиология. Патогенез. Клиника. Диагностика. ЛечениеПоллиноз. Этиология. Патогенез. Клиника. Диагностика. Лечение
Поллиноз. Этиология. Патогенез. Клиника. Диагностика. ЛечениеSemey State Medical University
 
Aula 1_IE_CEAG_2010
Aula 1_IE_CEAG_2010Aula 1_IE_CEAG_2010
Aula 1_IE_CEAG_2010zeusi9iuto
 
Aula patrimônio cultural
Aula patrimônio culturalAula patrimônio cultural
Aula patrimônio culturalCurso Letrados
 

Viewers also liked (13)

CNC Machinist skills
CNC Machinist skillsCNC Machinist skills
CNC Machinist skills
 
Classificacoes_1categ_nacional_2010_2011
Classificacoes_1categ_nacional_2010_2011Classificacoes_1categ_nacional_2010_2011
Classificacoes_1categ_nacional_2010_2011
 
SACHIN 4.6 years Exp
SACHIN 4.6 years ExpSACHIN 4.6 years Exp
SACHIN 4.6 years Exp
 
Organization
OrganizationOrganization
Organization
 
El agua
El aguaEl agua
El agua
 
PPT BAB 1
PPT BAB 1PPT BAB 1
PPT BAB 1
 
AIDT Leadership I
AIDT Leadership IAIDT Leadership I
AIDT Leadership I
 
Поллиноз. Этиология. Патогенез. Клиника. Диагностика. Лечение
Поллиноз. Этиология. Патогенез. Клиника. Диагностика. ЛечениеПоллиноз. Этиология. Патогенез. Клиника. Диагностика. Лечение
Поллиноз. Этиология. Патогенез. Клиника. Диагностика. Лечение
 
Aula 1_IE_CEAG_2010
Aula 1_IE_CEAG_2010Aula 1_IE_CEAG_2010
Aula 1_IE_CEAG_2010
 
CREATIVITY COUNTS.1
CREATIVITY COUNTS.1CREATIVITY COUNTS.1
CREATIVITY COUNTS.1
 
DANIEL - RESUME
DANIEL - RESUMEDANIEL - RESUME
DANIEL - RESUME
 
Aula patrimônio cultural
Aula patrimônio culturalAula patrimônio cultural
Aula patrimônio cultural
 
Património
PatrimónioPatrimónio
Património
 

Similar to MCS Presentation

Service to leadership workshop 8 22-11
Service to leadership workshop 8 22-11Service to leadership workshop 8 22-11
Service to leadership workshop 8 22-11Roni Jarvis
 
Event 3 Lp Presentation
Event 3 Lp PresentationEvent 3 Lp Presentation
Event 3 Lp Presentationmelbourn02
 
Literacy Leadership Teams
Literacy Leadership TeamsLiteracy Leadership Teams
Literacy Leadership TeamsKenneth McKee
 
Signature Assignment CUR 528: Planning a Needs Assessment
Signature Assignment CUR 528: Planning a Needs Assessment Signature Assignment CUR 528: Planning a Needs Assessment
Signature Assignment CUR 528: Planning a Needs Assessment EricaLJonesMAEd
 
Logic Model and Education
Logic Model and EducationLogic Model and Education
Logic Model and Educationdledingham
 
Lrng sppt eden grove
Lrng sppt     eden groveLrng sppt     eden grove
Lrng sppt eden groveclowd
 
Md6 assgn1doaneb
Md6 assgn1doanebMd6 assgn1doaneb
Md6 assgn1doanebbdoane48
 
Md6 assgn1doaneb
Md6 assgn1doanebMd6 assgn1doaneb
Md6 assgn1doanebbdoane48
 
Lchc tel-info-1
Lchc tel-info-1Lchc tel-info-1
Lchc tel-info-1telcalit2
 
01 Ubd Pd Jan 2010
01  Ubd Pd Jan 201001  Ubd Pd Jan 2010
01 Ubd Pd Jan 2010rxg581
 
Improving and Demonstrating Impact for Youth Using Qualitative Data
Improving and Demonstrating Impact for Youth Using Qualitative DataImproving and Demonstrating Impact for Youth Using Qualitative Data
Improving and Demonstrating Impact for Youth Using Qualitative DataDetroitYDRC
 
Frustrating formative
Frustrating formativeFrustrating formative
Frustrating formativeTansy Jessop
 
Guide to program evaluation
Guide to program evaluationGuide to program evaluation
Guide to program evaluationccelism
 
IPA Presentation, Danielson Framework - PJ Caposey
IPA Presentation, Danielson Framework - PJ CaposeyIPA Presentation, Danielson Framework - PJ Caposey
IPA Presentation, Danielson Framework - PJ CaposeyPJ Caposey
 
Breakfast future ready workshop
Breakfast future ready workshopBreakfast future ready workshop
Breakfast future ready workshopDerek Wenmoth
 
Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal Latoyah GrayGrand Ca
Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal Latoyah GrayGrand CaCommunity Teaching Work Plan Proposal Latoyah GrayGrand Ca
Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal Latoyah GrayGrand CaLynellBull52
 
2017 MassCUE Presentation: Evaluating Your 1:1 Learning Program: One District...
2017 MassCUE Presentation: Evaluating Your 1:1 Learning Program: One District...2017 MassCUE Presentation: Evaluating Your 1:1 Learning Program: One District...
2017 MassCUE Presentation: Evaluating Your 1:1 Learning Program: One District...Dave Quinn
 
Advancing Teaching and Learning Conference
Advancing Teaching and Learning ConferenceAdvancing Teaching and Learning Conference
Advancing Teaching and Learning ConferenceLisa DuBois Low
 

Similar to MCS Presentation (20)

Service to leadership workshop 8 22-11
Service to leadership workshop 8 22-11Service to leadership workshop 8 22-11
Service to leadership workshop 8 22-11
 
Event 3 Lp Presentation
Event 3 Lp PresentationEvent 3 Lp Presentation
Event 3 Lp Presentation
 
Literacy Leadership Teams
Literacy Leadership TeamsLiteracy Leadership Teams
Literacy Leadership Teams
 
Signature Assignment CUR 528: Planning a Needs Assessment
Signature Assignment CUR 528: Planning a Needs Assessment Signature Assignment CUR 528: Planning a Needs Assessment
Signature Assignment CUR 528: Planning a Needs Assessment
 
Logic Model and Education
Logic Model and EducationLogic Model and Education
Logic Model and Education
 
Investing in Paraeducator Capacity
Investing in Paraeducator CapacityInvesting in Paraeducator Capacity
Investing in Paraeducator Capacity
 
Lrng sppt eden grove
Lrng sppt     eden groveLrng sppt     eden grove
Lrng sppt eden grove
 
Md6 assgn1doaneb
Md6 assgn1doanebMd6 assgn1doaneb
Md6 assgn1doaneb
 
Md6 assgn1doaneb
Md6 assgn1doanebMd6 assgn1doaneb
Md6 assgn1doaneb
 
Lchc tel-info-1
Lchc tel-info-1Lchc tel-info-1
Lchc tel-info-1
 
Human Body
Human BodyHuman Body
Human Body
 
01 Ubd Pd Jan 2010
01  Ubd Pd Jan 201001  Ubd Pd Jan 2010
01 Ubd Pd Jan 2010
 
Improving and Demonstrating Impact for Youth Using Qualitative Data
Improving and Demonstrating Impact for Youth Using Qualitative DataImproving and Demonstrating Impact for Youth Using Qualitative Data
Improving and Demonstrating Impact for Youth Using Qualitative Data
 
Frustrating formative
Frustrating formativeFrustrating formative
Frustrating formative
 
Guide to program evaluation
Guide to program evaluationGuide to program evaluation
Guide to program evaluation
 
IPA Presentation, Danielson Framework - PJ Caposey
IPA Presentation, Danielson Framework - PJ CaposeyIPA Presentation, Danielson Framework - PJ Caposey
IPA Presentation, Danielson Framework - PJ Caposey
 
Breakfast future ready workshop
Breakfast future ready workshopBreakfast future ready workshop
Breakfast future ready workshop
 
Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal Latoyah GrayGrand Ca
Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal Latoyah GrayGrand CaCommunity Teaching Work Plan Proposal Latoyah GrayGrand Ca
Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal Latoyah GrayGrand Ca
 
2017 MassCUE Presentation: Evaluating Your 1:1 Learning Program: One District...
2017 MassCUE Presentation: Evaluating Your 1:1 Learning Program: One District...2017 MassCUE Presentation: Evaluating Your 1:1 Learning Program: One District...
2017 MassCUE Presentation: Evaluating Your 1:1 Learning Program: One District...
 
Advancing Teaching and Learning Conference
Advancing Teaching and Learning ConferenceAdvancing Teaching and Learning Conference
Advancing Teaching and Learning Conference
 

MCS Presentation

  • 1. Extending Success: Defining and Evaluating Excellence in The Met Community School Extended Day Programming Mateus Baptista, Lauren Combs, Jesse DeLauder, Gretchen Mills Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 3. MCS The Met Community School Mandatory extended day for 9th grade students Diverse programming Experiential learning Founded in 2003 Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 4. Community Learning Centers “In 1994, Congress authorized the 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21st Century) program to open up schools for broader use by their communities. In 1998, the program was refocused on providing academic, enrichment, and recreational activities in public schools during the after-school hours (centers also could be open before school, on weekends, and during the summer). The program grew from an appropriation of $40 million in 1998 to $1 billion in 2002, where it has remained.” (U.S. DOE, 2005) Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 5. Research Question How can the MCS extended day program measure and track progress towards their internal goals? Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 6. Q1:What are the perceived goals of MCS? Q2: Comparison of MCS program qualities with those of high-performing after school programs Q3: What are available indicators of success within MCS? How can the MCS extended day program measure and track progress towards their internal goals? Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 7. Literature Qualities of similar high- performing after-school and extended day program Successful evaluation of after-school and extended day programs Methods of research and evaluation The Met in Context Research Design Analysis Findings Recommendations Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 8. Qualitative Quantitative Interviews with students, administrators, and extended day providers Follow up questionnaire Design Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 9. Methods Interviews Questionnaire N=11 (Two admin, five student, four provider) Convenience Sample Purpose: 1) Address how extended day goals are perceived 2) Compare MCS qualities to those of existing programs 3) Identify available indicators of success Purpose: Measure perceived program success towards three MCS goals Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 10. Goals MCS Goals According to Director Safety College and Career Readiness Social and Emotional Learning Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 11. Methods Interview Protocol - Providers and Administrators Purpose: We are a research team interested in helping the MCS design an internal evaluation system. To do this, we would like to hear about your personal experience with the extended day program. You will not be identified by your responses, and they will remain confidential—only to be accessed by our four-person research team. Is it ok if we record this interview? 1. Please describe your role in the extended day program. 2. What do you see as the goals of the extended day program? 3. How do you know if the extended day program is meeting these goals? 5. What do you see are the strengths and weaknesses of the program? 6. How do you communicate to other staff/teachers within the program? How do you record challenges or successes for yourself? 7. Are there formal or informal opportunities for parental engagement? 8. How long have you worked at MCS? 9. What ethnicity do you identify with? 10. Is there anything else you would like to share that you have not yet had a chance to share? Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 12. Methods Interview Protocol - Student Purpose: We are a research team interested in helping the MCS design an internal evaluation system. To do this, we would like to hear about your personal experience with the extended day program. You will not be identified by your responses, and they will remain confidential—only to be accessed by our four-person research team. Is it ok if we record this interview? 1. Tell us about your experience with the extended day program at MCS. 2. Do you think it is important to have a program like this here in your community? 3. Did you continue on in the extended day program past 9th grade? Why did you do so? 4. How has the program affected your academics? Social life? 5. How is the program similar to what you do at school? How is it different? 6. What would you be doing after school if you weren’t coming to the program? 7. What is your favorite and least favorite part of the extended day program? 8. Do you have any ideas to make the extended day program better? 9. Do people listen when you have an opinion or concern about the extended day program? 10. Is there anything else you would like to tell us? 11. What ethnicity do you identify with? 12. What grade are you in? 13. How many years have you attended the extended day program? Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 13. Methods Follow-Up Questionnaire The Met Community School strives to provide its students with a safe environment, opportunities for social/emotional learning, and the skills necessary to succeed in college and career. To what extent do you think the extended day program is successful in achieving these goals? Safety College and Career Readiness Social/Emotional Learning 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 Not at all successful Somewhat successful Very successful Completed in private by ten of twelve interviewees and returned Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 14. Analysis 5) Questionnaire: measures of central tendency Qualitative Quantitative Subgoals Qualities Indicators Q1 Q2 Q3 Subgoals Qualities Indicators Subgoals Qualities Indicators Safety College/Career Readiness Social/Emotional Learning 4) Post Coding: Frequency counts 1) Transcribe Interviews 2) Initial Coding - General 3) Final Coding - Categorical Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 15. Codes Room for Improvement Low participation Disconnect between provider & admin Disorganization Add programs Mandatory for all grades No student input College/Career Readiness Multiple Pathways Extend Learning Times Academic Programming Build Job Skills Networking MCS Connection to Met School Internships Need for MCS Administration & Organization Professional Development Opportunities Internal Assessments Staff Supports Diversity of Programs Formal/Informal Family Engagement Staff Accountability School/Community Partnerships Provider Anxiety Safety Keep Kids Out of Trouble Participation Attendance Safe Environment Curb Delinquent Behavior Social/Emotional Learning Formal Student Leadership Opportunities Emotional Growth Peer Relationships Mentoring Student Engagement Finding your Passion Informal Student Leadership Opportunities Enrichment Opportunities Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 16. Findings Subquestion #1: What are the perceived goals of MCS? When asked “what do you feel are the goals of the extended day program?” administrators and providers responded... *Students were asked, “Do you think it’s important to have a program like MCS in your community? If so, why?” Q1 GoalCodes Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 17. Findings MCS Qualities and Indicators by Goal Q1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Frequency Talking About MCS Goals SAFETY Participation Attendance Safe Environment Curb Delinquent Behavior COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS Academic Programming Build Job Skills Networking MCS Connection to Met Vocational Training/ Internships SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL LEARNING Student Leadership Emotional Growth Peer Relationships Mentoring Student Engagement Enrichment Opportunities Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 18. Findings Perceived Success by Goal Q1 4.7 4 4.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 Safety College and Career Readiness Social-Emotional Learning Perceived Success Toward MCS Goals Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 19. Quality: A feature or component of a high performing after- school program. Subquestion #2: Comparison of MCS program qualities with those of high- performing after school programs AnalysisQ2 Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 20. Grounded Theory Top-DownAcademic programming Enrichment programming Fostering relationships Safe environment Diversity of programs Participation School community partnerships Connection to school Family engagement strategies Student leadership opportunities Internal evaluation Staff supports Experienced leadership Vocational Training and Internships AnalysisQ2 Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 21. Findings Comparison of MCS program qualities with those of high-performing after-school programs 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 SAFETY COLLEGE & CAREER READINESS SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL LEARNING N/A Q2 Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 22. Indicator: “A set of statements about activities and behavior that can be used to measure the extent to which after- school programs are providing high- quality opportunities for participants.” (Providence After School Alliance) Subquestion #3: What are available indicators of success within MCS? AnalysisQ3 Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 23. Analysis What are available indicators of success within MCS? When asked about measuring success and positive outcomes, administrators, students, and providers mentioned... Attendance Delinquent behavior Mentorship Student showcase Feelings towards school Networking Building job skills Peer relationships Emotional growth Student empowerment Q3 Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 24. Findings Indicators for Evaluation 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 SAFETY COLLEGE & CAREER READINESS SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL LEARNING Q3 Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 25. Recommendations Goals for MCS MCS should set clear goals that are communicated program-wide. Recommendation: Mission statement Finding: Emergent goals were informed by the three stated goals, but interviewees did not have a clear goal framework. Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 26. Recommendations Stated Goals from Director Emergent Goals Qualities Indicators Evaluation of MCS programming should be informed by emergent goals and best practices, using the appropriate stated indicators. Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 27. Recommendations Emerging Goals Qualities Indicators Social/Emotional Learning Find your passion Enrichment opportunities College/Career Readiness Extend classroom learning Safety Foster relationships Diversity of enrichment programs Student Leadership (formal and informal) Academic programming Internships Connection to Met Trying something new Mentoring Peer relationships Emotional growth Student engagement Networking Job skills Feelings towards schools Student showcase Participation Safe environment Delinquent behavior Attendance Evaluation Measurements Expectancy of success Effectance motivation Evaluation of students by provider and mentor Focus groups Longitudinal research of college enrollment, job placement, and program satisfaction Drop out rates Graduation rates Student pre- and post- tests Assessment of student showcase Attendance records Student pre- and post- tests Focus groups Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 28. Limitations Self- and organization-preservation bias Limits of internal validity Limited pre-existing data Convenience sampling Limits of external validity: unique situation Summer Program Small sample size Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 29. Next Steps 3)Study on the overarching community effects 1) Study performed during extended day programming 2) Design evaluation tools Wednesday, July 30, 14
  • 30. “So the strengths are just opening up so many doors of opportunity for these kids [who] may come from a background where they felt they wouldn’t amount to anything. Or they always could but they didn’t know how. It’s opening these doors so they can see which direction they may want to go, or figure out something about themselves they didn’t know. It’s just self-discovery.” -Provider & Former Student Wednesday, July 30, 14