Skip to main content
UploadLanguage (EN)Support
BusinessMobileSocial MediaMarketingTechnologyArt & PhotosCareerDesignEducationPresentations & Public SpeakingGovernment & NonprofitHealthcareInternetLawLeadership & ManagementAutomotiveEngineeringSoftwareRecruiting & HRRetailSalesServicesScienceSmall Business & EntrepreneurshipFoodEnvironmentEconomy & FinanceData & AnalyticsInvestor RelationsSportsSpiritualNews & PoliticsTravelSelf ImprovementReal EstateEntertainment & HumorHealth & MedicineDevices & HardwareLifestyle
Om Prakash Poddar, profile picture
Uploaded byOm Prakash Poddar
13,275 views

Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal before Supreme Court of India vide D.No. 45930 dated 05.06.2017

The document pertains to a legal appeal filed by petitioners Om Prakash and others in the Supreme Court of India, requesting urgent hearing against the registrar's refusal to register their writ petition regarding violations of their rights under Article 21 of the Constitution. The petitioners allege suppression of evidence, denial of access to justice, and imminent danger to their lives due to an ongoing conspiracy involving judicial figures and other officials. They have faced multiple dismissals, non-compliance with court orders, and numerous grievances have been lodged without satisfactory resolutions.

Law◦
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRL.M.P. NO. OF 2017 IN CRL.M.P. D.NO.16166 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL D.NO.3913 OF 2017 (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) IN THE MATTER OF: OM PRAKASH & ANR ……..PETITIONER VERSUS REGISTRAR ….RESPONDENT SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ANR S.N Particulars Copies Pages 1. Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal by way of motion against the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 along with Affidavit 1+3 1-34 2. Annexures P-1 to P-5 1+3 35-84
Petitioner in Person On behalf of Petitioner No.02 (Om Prakash) RZF-893, NETAJI SUBUSH MARG, RAJ NAGAR PART-2 PALAM COLONY, NEW DELHI- 110077, DWARKA SEC-08 MOB: 9968337815 E-mail: om.poddar@gmail.com (Widow Asha Rani Devi) Petitioner No.02 R/O ASHA DEEP NIWAS W/O LATE SHRI DEEP NARAYAN PODDAR SHUKKAR HATT, NEAR DURGA MANDIR P.S. KADWA, P.O. SONAILI DISTT. KATIHAR, BIHAR-855114 Filed on : 05.06.2017 Diary No : 45930
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRL.M.P. NO. OF 2017 IN CRL.M.P. D.NO.16166 OF 2017 WITH CRL.M.P. D.NO.17593 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL D.NO.3913 OF 2017 (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) IN THE MATTER OF: OM PRAKASH & ANR ……..PETITIONER VERSUS REGISTRAR ….RESPONDENT SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ANR APPLICATION FOR URGENT HEARING OF APPEAL BY WAY OF MOTION AGAINST THE LODGMENT
ORDER DATED 16.02.2017 IN W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA UNDER ORDER XV RULE 5 OF THE SUPREME COURT RULES, 2013. To Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the Petitioner abovenamed. MOST RESPECFULLY SHOWETH: 1. That the present petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India is being filed to enforce the Rights under Article 21 of the Constitution of India with Writ Petition Criminal vide D.NO. 3913 of 2017, Writ Petition Criminal vide D.NO. 2188 of 2017, Writ Petition
Criminal 136 of 2016 and Writ Petition Civil 90 of 2016; whereby Registrar (J-I) of this Hon’ble court has refused to register Writ Petition (Criminal) D.No. 3913 of 2017 under Article 32 of Constitution of India titled as “Om Prakash & Anr Vs. Registrar, Supreme Court of India & Anr” on the ground of no reasonable cause received for registration under order XV, Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 which has suspended the fundamental rights of the petitioners under Article 21 and closed the door of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioners forever, the contents of which are requested to be read as part of this application, as the same are not being repeated here for the sake of brevity. 2. That the matter pertains to imminent danger to life or personal liberty of the petitioners; perjury and planned murder designed by the nexus of Rtd. Justice Mr. S.B. Sinha of this Hon’ble Court and Mr. Praveen Kumar from Indian Defense Account Service (IDAS).
3. That all the petitions filed by the petitioner before this Hon’ble Court has been either dismissed or lodged or withdrawn because of suppression of records and denial of access to justice by this Hon’ble Court; which has resulted in planned murder/encounter of the petitioners. 4. That now, the petitioner has been left with only Appeal by way of motion against the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 as a last resort to access to the Court of Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India. 5. That the Registry has notified defects vide D.NO. 840/2017/X dated 22.03.2017 and D.NO. 840/2017/X dated 16.05.2017 in the Appeal by way of motion Crl. M.P. D.NO. 16166 of
2017 & Crl. M.P. D.NO. 17593 of 2017 against Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P. (Crl.) D.No.3913 of 2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. 6. That the petitioner has cured the notified defects of the Registrar and refiled the same vide D.NO.26314 dated 28.03.2017 and vide D.NO.42137 dated 19.05.2017 before this Hon’ble Court. 7. That the Appeal by way of motion vide Crl. M.P. D.NO. 16166 of 2017 with Crl. M.P. D.NO. 17593 of 2017 against the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 is pending since 20.02.2017 and this diary number is neither being converted into registered case nor being listed before the
Hon’ble Court so far. 8. That instead, the Registrar has forcibly registered the defective Curative (Crl.)D 41026 of 2016 without the consent of petitioners on 28.02.2017 and twice listed the same before the Hon’ble Judge in Chamber dated 27.03.2017 and 01.05.2017 for direction even after letter dated 17.12.2016; 22.12.2016; 31.12.2016; 06.01.2017; 25.01.2017; 02.03.2017; 23.03.2017 and 05.04.2017 by the petitioners. 9. That the petitioner has withdrawn a defective Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of 2016 vide D.NO. 19917 dated 03.03.2017. Moreover, the petitioner has NOT filed an interlocutory application for appearance in person against Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of 2016. Certified copy of Order dated 27.03.2017 and 01.05.2017 of this Hon’ble Court in Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of 2016; Certified copy of withdrawal
application M.P.(Crl.) D.NO.19917 of 2017 in Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of 2016 and Certified copy of para 15 of the Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of 2016 are annexed herein as Annexure P-1 (Page from 35 to 59) 10. That the Registrar has not complied the Order dated 01.05.2017 of this Hon’ble Court. The Order dated 01.05.2017 in Curative (Criminal)D 41026 of 2016 clearly says, remove office objections “from today”. Therefore it implies w.e.f. 01.05.2017 itself. However, the registry has not intimated the petitioner about the Hon’ble Court’s direction on 01.05.2017. Petitioner came to know about the Hon’ble Court’s direction when the order was uploaded at the website of Supreme Court of India dated 03.05.2017. Moreover, even after several reminders over telephone and email dated 03.05.2017 and 04.05.2017 to the Branch Officer Section X, petitioner was not allowed to remove office objections on 03.05.2017 and 04.05.2017.
Petitioner has forcibly refiled the withdrawal Application Crl. M.P. D.NO. 19917 of 2017 in Curative (Criminal)D 41026 of 2016 on 05.05.2017 complying the order dated 01.05.2017 of this Hon’ble Court and removing the office objection from the withdrawal application. That the Registry has neither complied the order dated 01.05.2017 of this Hon’ble Court nor paid any heed to the urgency of the petitioner and kept the Curative (Criminal)D 41026 of 2016 registered and pending before this Hon’ble Court as on date. 11. That the petitioners have prayed their urgency to list the Appeal by way of motion against the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 through email letter dated 04.05.2017 and letter vide D.NO.45513 dated 01.06.2017. However, the Registrar has not paid any heed to the urgency of the petitioner so far.
12. That there has been rampant suppression of records, violation of set practice, procedure and rules of this Hon’ble Court; evasion of Order XXXVIII of Supreme Court Rules 2013 and denial of access to justice to the petitioners by this Hon’ble Court since 2016 to till date. 13. That the petitioners are suffering from illness and undergoing treatment with AIIMS at New Delhi under illegal confinement in rented accommodation without any employment at New Delhi since 14 years. 14. That one death certificate is already on the record of SCR and another death certificate of petitioner no.02 is likely to be on the SCR. Thereafter no one will be left in her family and her life time acquired property will be usurped by the Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha and his associates.
15. That the petitioner has apprised the alleged involvement of Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha into this matter to the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India through nine cases for the interlinked subject matters with different cause of actions for the same relief till 03.02.2017. Fourteen year old matter, two states jurisdiction and illegal confinement. (SLP(C) no. 9854/2012, SLP(C) no. 9483/2013, SLP(C) no. 19073/2013, Writ (C) 90 of 2016, Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016, R.P. (Crl.) 825 of 2016, Curative (Crl.) D 41026 of 2016, Writ (Crl.) D.NO.2188 of 2017 and Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 3913 of 2017). 16. That the Police Complaint u/s 200 Cr.Pc. and u/s 154(3)Cr.Pc. vide diary no. 37B dated 30.05.2016, computerized complaint no. 00081710571601332 before P.S. Palam Village, South West District at New Delhi has also been filed by the petitioners for registration of F.I.R against Rtd Justice S.B. Sinha, Mr. Surender Narayan Poddar, Rtd. Baruni Refinery
employee and Mr. Praveen Kumar (IDAS)& CMD of IDPL at New Delhi. However, police has not registered F.I.R against the accused so far. 17. That the petitioner has filed W.P.(C) 90 of 2016 before this Hon’ble Court against Mr. Praveen Kumar(IDAS) for illegal termination of service without payment of wages which has been dismissed on 18.04.2016 by this Hon’ble Court. However, the same has been registered as letter petition and pending under Supreme Court Grievance Management System vide D.NO.2206 since 16.01.2016. Mr. Praveen Kumar (IDAS) & CMD of IDPL, Scope Complex, Lodhi Road New Delhi has not let the petitioner no.01 to work and kept him without work for one month at Head Office and dismissed him with mala fide intention and kept him under house arrest without any work since 2014 to till date. It is pertinent to mention here that the petitioners are residing in rented accommodation at New Delhi without any employment. Mr. Praveen Kumar
(IDAS) & his associates have hit all the BASIC NEEDS of petitioners in Bihar as well as in Delhi so that the petitioner no.01 & 02 could not survive in this world, which has been apprised and filed as written mentioning of arguments vide D.NO.28889 dated 08.04.2016 in W.P.(C) 90 of 2016. 18. That an offence of perjury has been committed by Mr. Praveen Kumar (IDAS) & CMD of IDPL through Written Statement (WS) dated 07.09.2015 filed before Patiala House Court at New Delhi which has been annexed as Annexure P- 42 (page from 223 to 248) in VOL-I in W.P.(C) 90 of 2016. Perjury has been exposed by the petitioner through replication dated 04.11.2015 which has been annexed as Annexure P-53 (page from 343 to 386) in VOL-II in W.P.(C) 90 of 2016. 19. That the petitioner has placed the names of thirty six bad elements of Center and
State Government’s apparatus alleged associates of Rtd Justice S.B. Sinha of this Hon’ble Court on the record of SCR with material evidence in Writ (C) 90 of 2016; Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016; Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 2188 of 2017 and Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 3913 of 2017 filed so far before this Hon’ble Court. List of Bad Elements are annexed herein as Annexure P-2 (Page from 60 to 65) 20. That the petitioner has also apprised Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India through letters via R&I department of Supreme Court of India vide diary no.15411 dated 01.04.2017; vide diary no. 16879 dated 10.04.2017 and vide diary no. 18543 dated 17.04.2017. 21. That the Grievance Management System of Supreme Court of India has registered total eleven grievances of petitioners as letter petition so far vide D.NO. 2206 dated 09.01.2016; vide D.NO.35529 dated 19.08.2016;
vide D.NO. 43126 dated 08.10.2016; vide D.NO. 47003 dated 13.10.2016; vide D.NO. 47004 dated 13.10.2016; vide D.NO. 50548 dated 21.10.2016; vide D.NO. 3179 dated 12.01.2017; vide D.NO. 3185 dated 17.01.2017; vide D.NO. 20578 dated 25.02.2017; vide D.NO. 17135 dated 08.04.2017; vide D.NO. 17748 dated 17.04.2017 which are either pending or disposed of without any relief in the garb of lame excuses like “letter petition does not cover under PIL guidelines or digitally not signed or tempering the name of applicant from Om Prakash to ABCD against D.NO. 20578”. Update of D.NO. 20578 of 2017 on 16.05.2017 and 20.05.2017 are annexed herein as Annexure P-3 (Page from 66 to 67) 22. That the Central Information Commission (CIC) at New Delhi has registered and admitted six second appeals and one complaint u/s 18 of RTI Act 2005 vide F.NO. CIC/SS/A/2013/901846-SA; vide F.NO. CIC/DLJLA/A/2017/183721 dated 20.01.2017; vide
F.NO. CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/113204 dated 06.03.2017; vide F.NO. CIC/SCOFI/A/2017/122864 dated 26.04.2017; vide F.NO. CIC/CICOM/A/2017/119689 dated 27.04.2017; vide F.NO. CIC/CICOM/A/2017/126308 dated 01.05.2017 and complaint vide F.NO.CIC/MOLAJ/C/2016/299945 dated 28.11.2016 against different cause actions for the interlinked same subject matters and for the same relief. The cause of actions for Second Appeal arose against Withdrawal of Legal Aid Services by Delhi High Court Legal Service Committee (DHCLSC) without prior intimation; refusal to reply or supply of false and misleading information by Dept of Legal Affairs, Government of India and Law Department Bihar; refusal to reply against suppression of records in the office report in W.P.(Crl.) 136 of 2016; violation of set practice, procedure and rules by the Registrar Misc. of Supreme Court of India in the garb of Judicial Order or interpretation of Law; refusal to reply and transfer physically the online RTI request by Department of Legal
Affairs, Ministry of Law & Justice Government of India pertaining to two States jurisdictions to the concerned PIO u/s 6(3)(i)(ii) of RTI Act to which the subject matter closely connected with; refusal to reply against refusal of registration of Writ petition Criminal D.NO. 2188 of 2017 entitled “Om Prakash & Anr VS. Union of India & Ors” before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the garb of Judicial Order or interpretation of Law; Non-Implementation of section 7(1) of RTI Act by Central Registry, CIC New Delhi and Non- disclosure of Complaint information concerning “Life and Liberty” at the website of CIC, New Delhi. The cause of action for Complaint u/s 18 of RTI Act 2005 arose against Patna High Court for no reply by FAA and supply of false and misleading information by PIO. However, out of six second appeals, CIC has announced only one decision on 25.09.2014 so far, which has also not been complied either by Delhi State Legal Services Authority or by Delhi High Court Legal Service Committee (DHCLSC) as on date.
23. That an Offence of PERJURY; abuse of court process; 14 years long criminal conspiracy; illegal confinement under house arrest; backstabbing; evasion of rule of law by the Advocates and Judges from lower court to High Court to Supreme Court of India; NO ACTUAL PARTY ONLY PROXY WAR THROUGH JUDGES IN TWO STATES from Lower Court to High Court to Supreme Court of India and Nine Cases have reached up to Supreme Court of India till 03.02.2017 are the main features of the whole petition. 24. That Widow Asha Rani Devi W/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar is petitioner No.02 (aged about 71 years & Oxygen dependent) herein in the Appeal by way of motion through Crl. M.P. D.No. 16166 of 2017 with Crl. M.P. D.No. 17593 of 2017 under Order XV Rule 5 of Supreme Court Rules 2013 against the Registrar’s Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.) D.NO.3913 of 2017 entitled “OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. THE REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ANR”.
25. That the Registrar Misc. is habitual and consistently involved in denying access to justice and planned murder/encounter of petitioners since 03.10.2016 by way of suppressing record, tempering record, circulating unregistered interlocutory applications for Constitution bench, Lodging petitions, circulating wrong office report before Hon’ble Judges, circulating half information before Hon’ble Judges and circulating her own communications/letters only and suppressing the communications/reply of the petitioners in the office report before Hon’ble Judges to shield/defend herself by the Hon’ble Judges and to offend/victimize petitioners as of now. 26. That the Registrar Misc. has suppressed the factual record in office report dated 20.10.2016 in Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016 and in Office report dated 25.03.2017 in Curative (Crl.)D 41026 of 2016. Interlocutory Application
vide D.NO.74930 dated 03.10.2016 for urgent mentioning of the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court in office report dated 20.10.2016 in Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016 has been suppressed. Interlocutory applications vide D.NO.77878 dated 18.10.2016 for Constitution bench has been circulated unregistered in Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016. The reply of petitioner dated 23.03.2017 against the Notification of defects dated 23.03.2017 by the Registrar has been suppressed in Office report dated 25.03.2017 in Curative (Crl.)D 41026 of 2016 against which RTI vide JUSTC/R/2017/50390 dated 26.03.2017 and First Appeal vide Appeal No.179/2017 have been filed by the petitioners. The First Appeal has been heard by Mr. Sanjay Parihar, Ld. Registrar (J-IV) cum FAA, Supreme Court of India on 01.06.2017. Moreover, the Registrar Misc. has neither supplied nor uploaded Office report dated 30.11.2016 in Review Petition (Crl.) 825 of 2016 as on date. RTI vide JUSTC/R/2017/50412 dated 30.03.2017 has
been filed for obtaining Office report dated 30.11.2016 in Review Petition (Crl.) 825 of 2016 by the petitioners. Certified copy of office report dated 20.10.2016 in W.P.(Crl.) 136 of 2016; Certified copy of office report dated NIL in R.P.(Crl.) 825 of 2016; Certified copy of office report dated 25.03.2017 and 28.04.2017 in Curative (Crl.)D 41026 of 2016 are annexed herein as Annexure P-4 (Page from 68 to 78) 27. That Judicial order being reversed from 03.04.2017 to 22.03.2017 by SDJM Ms Meena Kumari, CJM Division, Begusarai under the Judicature of Patna High Court at the behest of Supreme Court of India. 28. That three updates of order sheet by Begusarai Court dated 09.01.2017, 15.02.2017 and 30.03.2017 are evident of this fact that Judicial Murder is planned and designed from the Supreme Court of India. Case Updates at Begusarai Court dated 09.01.2017, 15.02.2017 and
30.03.2017 are annexed herein as Annexure P-5 (Page from 79 to 84) 29. That first update on 09.01.2017. (Date of Hearing 02.01.2017. Next Date of Hearing Not updated). Second update on 15.02.2017.( Next Date of Hearing 03.04.2017). Third update on 30.03.2017. (Date of Hearing 22.03.2017. Next Date of Hearing 03.07.2017) 30. That these three updates by CJM division Begusarai raises substantial question of Law. How 22.03.2017 became the date of hearing all of sudden while the date of hearing was already fixed for 03.04.2017? Who tempered the data at the e-court website? How Judicial order being reversed from 03.04.2017 to 22.03.2017? 31. That the answers of these questions are interlinked with the proceedings of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. Because in
Supreme Court, Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of 2016 was forcibly listed by Registrar before Hon'ble Justice Navin Sinha for direction on 27.03.2017. Because on 23.03.2017 the Registry had Notified defects to remove Prayer(b) from the Withdrawal Application of Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of 2016. The Petitioner had refused to remove the same at this Stage. The Petitioner had reverted back the Registry on the same date that he would not remove Prayer (b) from Withdrawal Application of Curative (Criminal) D 41026 of 2016 AT THIS STAGE. Hence, it was planned from Supreme Court and off the record/confidential/indirect direction being given from Supreme Court of India, therefore scheduled date of hearing was changed all of sudden from 03.04.2017 to 22.03.2017 by Ld. SDJM Ms Meena Kumari, CJM Division, Begusarai under the Judicature of Patna High Court. In nutshell, whatever is happening at CJM division Begusarai is Pre-Planned and being designed at the behest of Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha and his associates
from Supreme Court of India. 32. That the petitioner has filed the clarification with reasons against biased Judiciary as to why the matter not to be listed before Hon’ble Justice Ranjan Gagoi, Hon’ble Justice Prafulla Chandra Pant, Hon’ble Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose, Hon’ble Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Hon’ble Justice Navin Sinha vide D.NO.42137 dated 19.05.2017 against the Notification of defect vide D.NO.840/2017/X dated 16.05.2017 in Crl. M.P. D.NO.17593 of 2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.NO. 3913 of 2017 issued by the Registrar Misc of this Hon’ble Court. 33. That the actual respondent has NOT filed a single piece of paper throughout the case from Trial Court to High Court of Delhi. 34. That the Hon’ble Judges have played a role of respondents throughout the case.
35. That the matter has been settled by the High Court of Delhi in MATT.APPL. 7 of 2012 on 23.07.2013 with NO COST on the ground of certified copy of Begusarai court in Bihar and after SLP(C) no. 9854/2012, SLP(C) no. 9483/2013, SLP(C) no. 19073/2013 before this Hon’ble Court. Application for early hearing with receipt of delivery report of NOTICE of motion vide ED881673094IN dated 29.04.2013 is already on the record of SLP(C) No. 19073 of 2013 at page no. 165 to 169 annexed as Annexure P-22 in the same petition. The service affidavit with proof of delivery receipt of ED986320975IN dated 08.12.2012 has also been put on the record of High Court of Delhi on 22.01.2013 vide diary no. 2376. 36. That the actual respondent has filed two Criminal cases with two N.B.W before the CJM division Begusarai Bihar and has supplied the record of only one Criminal case with N.B.W to the Trial Court at New Delhi on 09.02.2011 and
has concealed another Criminal case with criminal intention. First Criminal case u/s D.V. Act dated 30.03.2010 with N.B.W. dated 25.08.2010 and another criminal case u/s 498A dated 07.02.2011 with N.B.W. dated 08.09.2011. First one has been closed while second one has been kept secret and has been disclosed through RTI dated 27.08.2016. Application for cancellation of N.B.W dated 25.08.2010 and replication to Criminal case Complaint No. 9P of 2010 u/s D.V. Act has been filed by the petitioners dated 03.03.2011 before CJM division Begusarai are already on the record of SLP(C) No. 19073 of 2013 at page no. 29 to 46 annexed as Annexure P-2(Colly)in the same petition. 37. That this Hon’ble Court has evaded the Order XXXVIII of Supreme Court Rules 2013 in Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016 and dismissed the same imposing liberty upon the petitioners to approach High Court.
38. That the petition raised substantial question of Law as to the interpretation of Constitution is required. Two states of jurisdictions are involved for the same cause of action and for the same relief. After winning from High Court of Delhi petitioner is being directed to approach Patna High Court for the same cause of action and for the same relief. 39. That aggrieved by this, the petitioner has filed Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 2188 of 2017 entitled “OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS” with Nine Prayers and nine reliefs which has been Lodged by the Registrar dated 28.01.2017 by this Hon’ble Court. 40. That the petitioner in Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 2188 of 2017 entitled “OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS” claiming relief of Mandamus or prohibition or certiorari in respect of cancellation of N.B.W dated 08.09.2011 issued u/s 83 Cr.Pc. against the petitioners and
quashing the Criminal Case Complaint (P) No. 5591 of 2013 u/s 498A of IPC. The petitioners also seek the dismissal and imprisonment against the concerned Magistrate and Women Protection Officer for an offence of perjury and illegal confinement of the petitioners. The petitioners also seek the removal of the legal aid Advocates from the empanelment of the legal Aid Institutions who were associated with the case of the petitioners from the Trial Court to this Hon’ble Court. The petitioners also seek cancellation of registration no. 836/1991 of Advocate Gopal Kumar and husband of Women protection officer registered under Bihar State Bar Council for an offence of perjury and seek Rs. 50 Lakh as compensation for causing them irreparable damage, loss and illegal confinement. The petitioners also seek dismissal against Mr. Praveen Kumar (IDAS) and seek Rs. 50 Lakh as compensation for an offence of perjury and keeping them captive and house arrest illegally and causing them irreparable damage
and loss. 41. That under the above noted circumstances Registrar of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has stopped the petitioners to agitate the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India and spoiled the genuine nine reliefs of petitioners prayed in Writ (Crl.) D.NO. 2188 of 2017. 42. That the husband of petitioner no. 02 has been encircled to death and the death certificate of the husband of petitioner no.02 is already on the record of SLP(C) NO. 9854 of 2012 at page no. 18 to 22 annexed as Annexure P- 1; SLP(C) NO. 9483 of 2013 at page no. 18 to 22 annexed as Annexure P-1(Colly) and SLP(C) NO. 19073 of 2013 at page no. 24 to 28 annexed as Annexure P-1(Colly) in the same petition. The death certificate of petitioner no.02 is likely to be on the SCR. Thereafter no one will be left
in her family and her life time acquired property will be usurped by the Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha and his associates. 43. That the illiterate, before independence born petitioner no.02 has earned her property through ploughing her own agricultural land, doing domestic household works at her neighborhood and selling cow dung. She is emotionally attached to her property and wants to die at her own house not in Delhi. However, she is being stopped to visit her own house since two years due to disclosure of N.B.W. u/s 83 Cr.Pc through RTI dated 27.08.2016. Hence, freedom of movement across Indian Territory has been infringed by the Lower Court under the Judicature of Patna High Court. 44. That the present application contains the evidence against suppression of records, denial of access to justice and planned judicial murder/encounter designed by the
Supreme Court of India. 45. That this Hon’ble Court has complete jurisdiction and power to allow the present application for urgent hearing of Appeal by way of motion against the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. PRAYER In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased: (i) To allow the application for urgent hearing of Appeal by way of motion against the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013.
(ii) To direct the Registrar to register the W.P.(Crl.)D.NO.3913 of 2017 and allow the petitioners to agitate against suppression of records, denial of access to justice and planned judicial murder/encounter designed by the Supreme Court of India before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court for urgent relief. (iii) Pass such other order/orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. DRAWN & FILED BY: Om Prakash Petitioner No.01 On behalf of Petitioner No.02
S/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar Rented R/O RZF-893, Netaji Subhash Marg Raj Nagar, Part-2, Palam Colony, New Delhi-110077 Mob: 9968337815 Email: om.poddar@gmail.com Widow Asha Rani Devi Petitioner No.02 W/O Late Shri Deep Narayan Poddar R/O ASHA DEEP NIWAS Shukkar Hatt, Near Durga Mandir Sonaili, Katihar, Bihar-855114 NEW DELHI: Filed on: 05.06.2017 Diary No. 45930
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRL.M.P. NO. OF 2017 IN CRL.M.P. D.NO.16166 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL D.NO.3913 OF 2017 (UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA) IN THE MATTER OF: OM PRAKASH & ANR ……..PETITIONER VERSUS REGISTRAR ….RESPONDENT SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ANR AFFIDAVIT I, Om Prakash S/o Late Deep Narayan Poddar, aged 44 years, R/o RZF/893, Netaji Subash Marg, Raj Nagar Part-II, Palam Colony, New Delhi - 77, do
hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as under:- 1.That I am the Petitioner in the above matter and well conversant with the facts of the case as such competent to swear this affidavit. 2. That the contents of the accompanying application for urgent hearing of Appeal by way of motion against the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 which has been drafted by me [para 01 to 45.], [Page 01 to 32] and I, As. and having understood the contents thereof I say that the facts state therein are correct which are based on the official record.
3. That the accompanying application for urgent hearing contains total pages 84.’ 4. That the annexures are true copies of their respective originals. DEPONENT VERIFICATION: I, the above-named deponent do hereby verify that the facts stated in the above affidavit are true to my knowledge and belief. No part of the same is false and nothing material has been concealed therefrom. Verified at New Delhi on this the 5th day of June, 2017. DEPONENT