L.O.W Reliable Sites
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•96 views
1) The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the reliability of websites, including checking who authored the content and when it was last updated, and ensuring the site aims are clear and information is unbiased. 2) It recommends verifying a site's qualifications and contact information, and avoiding sites with excessive advertising or that require downloading software. 3) The document also cautions that hate groups may publish misinformation about sites and provides links to check a site's affiliations.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Reliable Resources
1) The document provides guidance on how to evaluate whether websites contain reliable information for research purposes. It discusses checking who authored the content and whether the site achieves its stated purpose.
2) The document recommends considering whether the site's goals are clear and relevant to the user's needs. It provides some example types of website goals.
3) The document lists several external websites that can help users evaluate websites and determine if the information is reliable, and conduct assessments of their research skills.
Reliable Resources
1) The document provides guidance on how to evaluate whether websites contain reliable information for research purposes. It discusses checking who authored the content and whether the site achieves its stated purpose.
2) The document recommends several websites that can help determine if a site is reliable, as well as tips for evaluating a site's relevance and sorting reliable resources.
3) It concludes by encouraging the reader to test their skills in evaluating websites and thanks sources that helped create the document.
Searching For Reliable Resources
This presentation discusses how to evaluate the reliability of online sources. Some websites contain inaccurate or outdated information because they can be easily edited by anyone or contain viruses. Students are capable of distinguishing reliable sources from unreliable ones. The document provides tips for evaluating websites such as checking the date, ownership, for biases, comparing to other sources, and scanning for viruses. It recommends specific websites that can help fact-check information found online.
Searching For Reliable Resources
This presentation discusses how to evaluate the reliability of online sources. Some websites contain inaccurate or outdated information because they can be easily edited by anyone or contain viruses. Students are capable of distinguishing reliable sources from unreliable ones. The document provides tips on vetting sources, such as checking the date, ownership, and looking for biases. It recommends fact-checking information across multiple sources and using antivirus software to identify unreliable websites that contain false information, viruses, or biased comments.
Website evaluation
The document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It discusses checking the domain name to determine the sponsor's reliability. Key questions to consider include the 5 Ws: who wrote it, what is the purpose/content, when was it created/updated, where did the information come from, and why should it be trusted. Additionally, the appearance and functionality of the site should be examined to ensure it is professional, loads quickly, and is easy to navigate. The example shows a student evaluating two dragonfly websites, determining that the .edu site "Dragonflies of Kentucky" would be best for a research project due to more complete information and affiliation with an educational institution.
The 5Ws of Web Site Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites using Kathy Schrock's "5Ws" method: Who, What, When, Where, Why. It explains how to use each "W" to analyze the authorship, purpose, date, sourcing of information, and usefulness of a website. Examples are given such as looking for author credentials, determining when a site was last updated, and checking for bibliographies or references. The overall method helps determine whether a website is reliable and appropriate for research needs.
R U 4 R.E.A.L? Strategy for Website Evaluation
This document provides a strategy called R.E.A.L. for effectively evaluating websites. R.E.A.L. stands for Read the URL, Examine the content, Ask about the author and owner, and Look at the links. It then explains each step in the strategy and provides examples of how to apply each step. The goal is for students to learn the R.E.A.L. strategy to help them evaluate websites based on their needs, such as for a hypothetical project on declining honeybee populations. Students are given several potential resource websites to evaluate using this strategy.
Is It CRAP? Using a Memorable Acronym to Teach Critical Website Evaluation Sk...
PowerPoint presentation from our session at the Wisconsin Association of Academic Librarians 2011 Annual Conference: Renew, Energize, Sustain, April 26-29, in Stevens Point, WI.
Recommended
Reliable Resources
1) The document provides guidance on how to evaluate whether websites contain reliable information for research purposes. It discusses checking who authored the content and whether the site achieves its stated purpose.
2) The document recommends considering whether the site's goals are clear and relevant to the user's needs. It provides some example types of website goals.
3) The document lists several external websites that can help users evaluate websites and determine if the information is reliable, and conduct assessments of their research skills.
Reliable Resources
1) The document provides guidance on how to evaluate whether websites contain reliable information for research purposes. It discusses checking who authored the content and whether the site achieves its stated purpose.
2) The document recommends several websites that can help determine if a site is reliable, as well as tips for evaluating a site's relevance and sorting reliable resources.
3) It concludes by encouraging the reader to test their skills in evaluating websites and thanks sources that helped create the document.
Searching For Reliable Resources
This presentation discusses how to evaluate the reliability of online sources. Some websites contain inaccurate or outdated information because they can be easily edited by anyone or contain viruses. Students are capable of distinguishing reliable sources from unreliable ones. The document provides tips for evaluating websites such as checking the date, ownership, for biases, comparing to other sources, and scanning for viruses. It recommends specific websites that can help fact-check information found online.
Searching For Reliable Resources
This presentation discusses how to evaluate the reliability of online sources. Some websites contain inaccurate or outdated information because they can be easily edited by anyone or contain viruses. Students are capable of distinguishing reliable sources from unreliable ones. The document provides tips on vetting sources, such as checking the date, ownership, and looking for biases. It recommends fact-checking information across multiple sources and using antivirus software to identify unreliable websites that contain false information, viruses, or biased comments.
Website evaluation
The document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It discusses checking the domain name to determine the sponsor's reliability. Key questions to consider include the 5 Ws: who wrote it, what is the purpose/content, when was it created/updated, where did the information come from, and why should it be trusted. Additionally, the appearance and functionality of the site should be examined to ensure it is professional, loads quickly, and is easy to navigate. The example shows a student evaluating two dragonfly websites, determining that the .edu site "Dragonflies of Kentucky" would be best for a research project due to more complete information and affiliation with an educational institution.
The 5Ws of Web Site Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites using Kathy Schrock's "5Ws" method: Who, What, When, Where, Why. It explains how to use each "W" to analyze the authorship, purpose, date, sourcing of information, and usefulness of a website. Examples are given such as looking for author credentials, determining when a site was last updated, and checking for bibliographies or references. The overall method helps determine whether a website is reliable and appropriate for research needs.
R U 4 R.E.A.L? Strategy for Website Evaluation
This document provides a strategy called R.E.A.L. for effectively evaluating websites. R.E.A.L. stands for Read the URL, Examine the content, Ask about the author and owner, and Look at the links. It then explains each step in the strategy and provides examples of how to apply each step. The goal is for students to learn the R.E.A.L. strategy to help them evaluate websites based on their needs, such as for a hypothetical project on declining honeybee populations. Students are given several potential resource websites to evaluate using this strategy.
Is It CRAP? Using a Memorable Acronym to Teach Critical Website Evaluation Sk...
PowerPoint presentation from our session at the Wisconsin Association of Academic Librarians 2011 Annual Conference: Renew, Energize, Sustain, April 26-29, in Stevens Point, WI.
Website Evaluation Lesson
A website evaluation lesson for an elementary classroom, prepared for an Instructional Technology university course.
Evaluating Web Resources
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the reliability and credibility of information found on websites. It discusses looking at the source of the information, including the author's credentials and expertise, as well as the type of organization responsible for the website. It also discusses considering the purpose and potential bias of the website by examining its intended audience and agenda. Finally, it discusses evaluating the accuracy and currency of the website's content by looking for citations, references, and dates. Checklists and additional resources for evaluating websites are also provided.
Evaluating websites edit
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for research purposes. It discusses looking at the credibility and authority of the author, accuracy and reliability of the information, date of publication, and sources cited. Some factors to consider include the purpose of the site, biases, and what the URL reveals about the domain and organization responsible for the site. Students are encouraged to carefully evaluate sources rather than just accepting sources at face value.
Website Evaluation
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability. It discusses several criteria to consider, referred to as CARRDSS: credibility, accuracy, reliability, relevance, date, sources behind the text, and scope/purpose. For each criterion, questions are provided to help assess different aspects, such as considering the author's credentials, checking for errors or inconsistencies, understanding biases present, and verifying facts through other sources. The document emphasizes the importance of carefully evaluating information sources to ensure reliability and credibility for research.
Website Evaluation Presentation
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and quality in order to determine if they are appropriate sources to cite for school assignments. It recommends using the Five W's - Who, What, When, Where, Why - as a framework to analyze the author's credentials, purpose of site, date of publication, domain type, and sources cited. Students are reminded to consider more than one website and also use print resources, as the quality of sources impacts teachers' evaluation of student work. Being a careful evaluator is important for making informed decisions.
Evaluating web content authenticity
This presentation discussed Kathy Schrock's "5 W's" construct and how to use it to assess the validity or web content. This is a companion piece to the article published on EmergingEdTech.com [URL]
Evaluating websites
This document provides guidance on evaluating online information sources and websites. It discusses evaluating electronic information for accuracy, relevance, appropriateness, comprehensiveness, and bias. It also discusses evaluating new information resources and technological innovations based on their appropriateness for specific tasks. Key factors for evaluating websites discussed include considering who authored the site, what the purpose and potential biases are, when it was created and last updated, where the information comes from, and why the information would be useful. A checklist of "5 W" questions is provided to systematically evaluate websites.
The 5 Ws Of Cyberspace
The document discusses applying the 5 W's (who, what, when, where, why) and 1 H (how) to evaluate information found online. It provides tips for identifying credible sources, determining biases, checking for updated information, understanding website addresses, and verifying facts from multiple sources. Applying skepticism and cross-checking information is advised to determine what information can be trusted on the internet.
Criteria for Web Site Evaluation
This document provides criteria for evaluating websites, focusing on content, credibility, and usability. It lists questions in several categories, including who wrote the content and their credentials, the purpose of the site, when it was created and last updated, where the organization is located and whether others endorse it, why the information should be trusted, and why students should evaluate websites. It notes that fewer than 10% of students check the accuracy of online information, and that developing internet evaluation skills is important for scientific research skills.
Validating web sites 3 4
The document provides guidance on how to validate and evaluate the quality of information found on websites using the REAL strategy. The REAL strategy involves: R-Reading the URL, E-Examining the content, A-Asking about the author/publisher, and L-Looking at links. It discusses how to analyze domain names, extensions, content, authors, forward and external links to determine reliability and potential biases. Examples of trustworthy and questionable websites are also provided.
Spam works
I have been thinking of tracking some sites which rank amazingly well in serp despite bad SEO. Finally I got time to do that.
Keyword : pirater compte facebook
Site: fbpirateruncomptegratuit.fr
I checked its ranking today 20th Sep and Here’s the screenshot:
Website Work
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites. It outlines several factors to consider, such as checking who authored the content and whether their credentials can be verified, comparing information across multiple sources, assessing if the content is biased or presents alternative perspectives, and confirming the information is up-to-date. The document encourages users to consult multiple websites on a topic rather than relying solely on a single source. It aims to help readers confidently determine which websites can be trusted for information.
Protecting your privacy online
This document provides tips for protecting privacy online, including using strong and unique passwords, creating separate accounts for personal and professional use, being selective about sharing information and photos, and checking privacy settings regularly. It also lists several resources for learning more about privacy issues online.
El Arte De Adelgazar 01
Una persona discute su frustración con la dieta y el control de calorías, señalando que ya ha dejado la carne, las verduras y ahora planea dejar el agua. La persona se describe a sí misma como un cero en una escala del uno al diez en términos de progreso con la dieta.
Como publicar un blog??
Aca les dejamos unas diapositivas que les pueden servir de mucha ayuda si no sabe o puede publicar un blog. Espero que les ayude mucho!
Un beso, Cande y Dalma.
16 03 06 Smiths Aeros 2084a
The meeting covered several topics:
1. An overview of activities since the last meeting including development of an anomaly detection software tool and building models for gears.
2. A presentation and demonstration of results from offline data analysis including assessment of models and cases of anomalies detected.
3. Planning for the upcoming 6-month live trial system including additional system development and operational procedures.
4. Discussions around additional potential data sources for testing and future research directions like improved data preprocessing and probabilistic alerting policies.
Reliable Resources
1) The document provides guidance on how to evaluate whether websites contain reliable information for research purposes. It discusses checking who authored the content and whether the site achieves its stated purpose.
2) The document recommends several websites that can help determine if a site is reliable, as well as tips for evaluating a site's relevance and sorting reliable resources.
3) It includes links to websites that provide rubrics for teachers to assess students' skills in evaluating online information sources.
Reliable Resources
1) The document provides guidance on how to evaluate whether websites contain reliable information for research purposes. It discusses checking who authored the content and whether the site achieves its stated purpose.
2) The document recommends several websites that can help determine if a site is reliable, as well as tips for evaluating a site's relevance and sorting reliable resources.
3) It concludes by encouraging the reader to test their skills in evaluating websites and thanks sources that helped create the document.
More Related Content
What's hot
Website Evaluation Lesson
A website evaluation lesson for an elementary classroom, prepared for an Instructional Technology university course.
Evaluating Web Resources
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the reliability and credibility of information found on websites. It discusses looking at the source of the information, including the author's credentials and expertise, as well as the type of organization responsible for the website. It also discusses considering the purpose and potential bias of the website by examining its intended audience and agenda. Finally, it discusses evaluating the accuracy and currency of the website's content by looking for citations, references, and dates. Checklists and additional resources for evaluating websites are also provided.
Evaluating websites edit
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for research purposes. It discusses looking at the credibility and authority of the author, accuracy and reliability of the information, date of publication, and sources cited. Some factors to consider include the purpose of the site, biases, and what the URL reveals about the domain and organization responsible for the site. Students are encouraged to carefully evaluate sources rather than just accepting sources at face value.
Website Evaluation
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability. It discusses several criteria to consider, referred to as CARRDSS: credibility, accuracy, reliability, relevance, date, sources behind the text, and scope/purpose. For each criterion, questions are provided to help assess different aspects, such as considering the author's credentials, checking for errors or inconsistencies, understanding biases present, and verifying facts through other sources. The document emphasizes the importance of carefully evaluating information sources to ensure reliability and credibility for research.
Website Evaluation Presentation
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and quality in order to determine if they are appropriate sources to cite for school assignments. It recommends using the Five W's - Who, What, When, Where, Why - as a framework to analyze the author's credentials, purpose of site, date of publication, domain type, and sources cited. Students are reminded to consider more than one website and also use print resources, as the quality of sources impacts teachers' evaluation of student work. Being a careful evaluator is important for making informed decisions.
Evaluating web content authenticity
This presentation discussed Kathy Schrock's "5 W's" construct and how to use it to assess the validity or web content. This is a companion piece to the article published on EmergingEdTech.com [URL]
Evaluating websites
This document provides guidance on evaluating online information sources and websites. It discusses evaluating electronic information for accuracy, relevance, appropriateness, comprehensiveness, and bias. It also discusses evaluating new information resources and technological innovations based on their appropriateness for specific tasks. Key factors for evaluating websites discussed include considering who authored the site, what the purpose and potential biases are, when it was created and last updated, where the information comes from, and why the information would be useful. A checklist of "5 W" questions is provided to systematically evaluate websites.
The 5 Ws Of Cyberspace
The document discusses applying the 5 W's (who, what, when, where, why) and 1 H (how) to evaluate information found online. It provides tips for identifying credible sources, determining biases, checking for updated information, understanding website addresses, and verifying facts from multiple sources. Applying skepticism and cross-checking information is advised to determine what information can be trusted on the internet.
Criteria for Web Site Evaluation
This document provides criteria for evaluating websites, focusing on content, credibility, and usability. It lists questions in several categories, including who wrote the content and their credentials, the purpose of the site, when it was created and last updated, where the organization is located and whether others endorse it, why the information should be trusted, and why students should evaluate websites. It notes that fewer than 10% of students check the accuracy of online information, and that developing internet evaluation skills is important for scientific research skills.
Validating web sites 3 4
The document provides guidance on how to validate and evaluate the quality of information found on websites using the REAL strategy. The REAL strategy involves: R-Reading the URL, E-Examining the content, A-Asking about the author/publisher, and L-Looking at links. It discusses how to analyze domain names, extensions, content, authors, forward and external links to determine reliability and potential biases. Examples of trustworthy and questionable websites are also provided.
Spam works
I have been thinking of tracking some sites which rank amazingly well in serp despite bad SEO. Finally I got time to do that.
Keyword : pirater compte facebook
Site: fbpirateruncomptegratuit.fr
I checked its ranking today 20th Sep and Here’s the screenshot:
Website Work
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites. It outlines several factors to consider, such as checking who authored the content and whether their credentials can be verified, comparing information across multiple sources, assessing if the content is biased or presents alternative perspectives, and confirming the information is up-to-date. The document encourages users to consult multiple websites on a topic rather than relying solely on a single source. It aims to help readers confidently determine which websites can be trusted for information.
Protecting your privacy online
This document provides tips for protecting privacy online, including using strong and unique passwords, creating separate accounts for personal and professional use, being selective about sharing information and photos, and checking privacy settings regularly. It also lists several resources for learning more about privacy issues online.
What's hot (13)
Viewers also liked
El Arte De Adelgazar 01
Una persona discute su frustración con la dieta y el control de calorías, señalando que ya ha dejado la carne, las verduras y ahora planea dejar el agua. La persona se describe a sí misma como un cero en una escala del uno al diez en términos de progreso con la dieta.
Como publicar un blog??
Aca les dejamos unas diapositivas que les pueden servir de mucha ayuda si no sabe o puede publicar un blog. Espero que les ayude mucho!
Un beso, Cande y Dalma.
16 03 06 Smiths Aeros 2084a
The meeting covered several topics:
1. An overview of activities since the last meeting including development of an anomaly detection software tool and building models for gears.
2. A presentation and demonstration of results from offline data analysis including assessment of models and cases of anomalies detected.
3. Planning for the upcoming 6-month live trial system including additional system development and operational procedures.
4. Discussions around additional potential data sources for testing and future research directions like improved data preprocessing and probabilistic alerting policies.
Viewers also liked (7)
Similar to L.O.W Reliable Sites
Reliable Resources
1) The document provides guidance on how to evaluate whether websites contain reliable information for research purposes. It discusses checking who authored the content and whether the site achieves its stated purpose.
2) The document recommends several websites that can help determine if a site is reliable, as well as tips for evaluating a site's relevance and sorting reliable resources.
3) It includes links to websites that provide rubrics for teachers to assess students' skills in evaluating online information sources.
Reliable Resources
1) The document provides guidance on how to evaluate whether websites contain reliable information for research purposes. It discusses checking who authored the content and whether the site achieves its stated purpose.
2) The document recommends several websites that can help determine if a site is reliable, as well as tips for evaluating a site's relevance and sorting reliable resources.
3) It concludes by encouraging the reader to test their skills in evaluating websites and thanks sources that helped create the document.
Reliable Resources
1) The document provides guidance on how to evaluate whether websites contain reliable information for research purposes. It discusses checking who authored the content and whether the site achieves its stated purpose.
2) The document recommends several websites that can help determine if a site is reliable, as well as tips for evaluating a site's relevance and sorting reliable resources.
3) It encourages the reader to practice evaluating websites and provides some rubrics their teacher could use to assess the skills.
Reliable Resources
1) The document provides guidance on how to evaluate whether websites contain reliable information for research purposes. It discusses checking who authored the content and whether the site achieves its stated purpose.
2) The document recommends considering whether the site's goals are clear and relevant to the user's needs. It provides some example types of website goals.
3) The document lists several external websites that can help users evaluate websites and determine if the information is reliable, and conduct assessments of their research skills.
website work
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of information found on websites. It outlines several factors to consider, such as checking who authored the content and whether their credentials can be verified, comparing the information to other reliable sources, assessing if the content is biased or presents multiple perspectives, and confirming the information is up to date. The overall aim is to help people identify trustworthy websites and confidently determine which sites to use for research or answering questions.
Online Research
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider in determining whether a site meets that standard, such as checking for author credentials, obvious mistakes, biased or inflammatory language, dated content, and usability of navigation. The document advises using search engines like Google to investigate authors and sponsors when information is missing from sites, and provides additional tips for effective online research.
Online Research (2)
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider that can help determine whether a site is a good source of information or not. The document also provides some tips on using search engines like Google to investigate authors, sponsors and potential biases. It recommends additional online research resources available through the HISD library system.
Website For Essay
Website Credibility Evaluation Essay
Evaluation of a Website Essay
Website Evaluation Essay
Essay on How to Analyze a Website
Essay On HTML
Website Design Essay
Essay On Website Security
Essay on The World Wide Web
Essay On Website Design
Website Analysis Essay
Online Marketing Essay
Searching For Reliable Resources
This presentation discusses distinguishing reliable from unreliable websites. Some websites contain inaccurate or outdated information since anyone can edit pages without oversight. Viruses, false information, and biased comments are also risks. Reliable sites have corroborating information from other sources, disclose authorship and ownership, and have been checked for viruses. Students are capable of evaluating websites, and provided resources like archive.org can help verify information and check for previous website versions. The conclusion advocates governments preventing virus-infected sites.
Website Evaluation
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for reliability and quality. It recommends checking the domain name to determine the sponsor, with .edu, .gov and .org domains generally being more reliable. It also recommends considering the 5 W's - Who, What, When, Where, Why - such as checking for the author's credentials, purpose of the site, when it was last updated. Finally, it suggests examining website characteristics like load speed, easy navigation, lack of errors or interfering ads. An example compares two dragonfly websites, finding one superior for research due to more complete information like author and date.
Web Literacy
The document provides guidance on evaluating the reliability of information found on websites. It lists several websites and encourages asking questions about their topics and sources. It also includes tips for validating websites, such as checking the domain name, publisher, history, and external links. Finally, it directs the reader to evaluate additional websites using the questions provided.
Untangling The Web.Notebook1
The document provides guidance on evaluating the reliability of information found on websites. It lists several websites and asks the reader to analyze what they are about and whether they are good sources of information. It then prompts the reader to question whether the websites are truly what they seem by considering who published the information, why it was published, what it is about, where it is from, and when it was published. Finally, it provides tips for validating websites by checking their domain information, publication history, and external links.
Evaluating websites linear
This guide teaches students how to evaluate websites for reliability and accuracy. It discusses evaluating a website based on who created it, where it is from, why it was created, what type of content it contains, and when it was last updated. The guide provides criteria for each category and examples of evaluating sample websites about Abraham Lincoln. It emphasizes the importance of evaluation to determine if a website is trustworthy and appropriate for research.
Website evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating the validity and reliability of information found on websites. It discusses why it is important to carefully examine the source and accuracy of online information. Key factors to consider include the author's credentials, date of publication, purpose of the site, potential biases, and whether other reliable sources corroborate the information. Students are given examples of trustworthy and questionable websites and instructed to practice evaluating sites using a rubric. The goal is to help students think critically about online content and distinguish factual reporting from unreliable or misleading information.
Wading through the web revised9 28-2010
This document provides guidance on conducting research on the internet, including:
1. It discusses different types of search engines such as regular search engines, metasearch engines, and specialized search engines that categorize or allow question-based searches.
2. It teaches how to perform advanced searches and use Boolean operators to narrow search results. Checklists are provided to evaluate website reliability.
3. Guidance is given on properly citing internet sources using a standard format of author, title, URL, copyright date and date accessed when adding websites to a bibliography.
Safe Internet Presentation
This document provides guidance on evaluating the reliability of websites for research and identifying good versus questionable sources of information. It outlines seven criteria for checking websites, such as whether the information is relevant, authorized, and unbiased. Examples are given of websites that may contain false information or be unreliable sources, like blogs, Wikipedia pages that can be edited by anyone, and sites with obvious factual errors. Students are advised to look for the name of an authorizing company or person and not believe claims that seem too good to be true like guaranteed prizes or vacations. The document concludes by reminding students to check a site's reliability before using it according to the guidelines provided.
sherina cheuk serena ict presentation
This document provides guidance on evaluating the reliability of websites for research or homework. It outlines several factors to consider, such as whether the information is opinionated or factual, whether there is a credible author or organization behind it, and whether the facts seem plausible. Examples are given of websites that may or may not be trustworthy sources based on these criteria. The document encourages fact-checking websites before using them for school assignments in order to avoid citing false information.
Internet Safety Presentation
This document provides guidance on evaluating the reliability of websites for research or homework. It outlines several factors to consider, such as whether the information is opinionated or factual, whether there is an identifiable author or organization responsible for the content, and whether the facts seem plausible. Examples are given of websites that may be reliable sources of information versus those that seem unreliable or intended to mislead users. The overall message is that students should carefully check websites for signs of reliability before using them for school assignments.
Cheuk, Sherina and Serena ICT Presentation
This document provides guidance on evaluating the reliability of websites for research or homework. It outlines several factors to consider, such as whether the information is from an authorized source, is factually accurate, and is relevant to the topic being researched. Questionable sites include blogs, Wikipedia where anyone can edit pages, and sites with obvious errors or claims that seem untrue. The summary cautions students to check for the author or company behind information on a site and not to trust sites simply making unrealistic claims or promises without evidence.
Bare bones
This document summarizes an educational tutorial from the University of South Carolina on how to effectively search the web. It discusses different types of search tools like search engines, metasearch engines, subject directories, and gateways. It emphasizes the importance of evaluating websites for reliability and provides tips for using Boolean logic operators to refine search queries. The tutorial aims to help users reduce frustration with unclear or irrelevant search results by better understanding available search options and techniques.
Similar to L.O.W Reliable Sites (20)
Recently uploaded
JavaLand 2024: Application Development Green Masterplan
My presentation slides I used at JavaLand 2024
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAU
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-und-domino-lizenzkostenreduzierung-in-der-welt-von-dlau/
DLAU und die Lizenzen nach dem CCB- und CCX-Modell sind für viele in der HCL-Community seit letztem Jahr ein heißes Thema. Als Notes- oder Domino-Kunde haben Sie vielleicht mit unerwartet hohen Benutzerzahlen und Lizenzgebühren zu kämpfen. Sie fragen sich vielleicht, wie diese neue Art der Lizenzierung funktioniert und welchen Nutzen sie Ihnen bringt. Vor allem wollen Sie sicherlich Ihr Budget einhalten und Kosten sparen, wo immer möglich. Das verstehen wir und wir möchten Ihnen dabei helfen!
Wir erklären Ihnen, wie Sie häufige Konfigurationsprobleme lösen können, die dazu führen können, dass mehr Benutzer gezählt werden als nötig, und wie Sie überflüssige oder ungenutzte Konten identifizieren und entfernen können, um Geld zu sparen. Es gibt auch einige Ansätze, die zu unnötigen Ausgaben führen können, z. B. wenn ein Personendokument anstelle eines Mail-Ins für geteilte Mailboxen verwendet wird. Wir zeigen Ihnen solche Fälle und deren Lösungen. Und natürlich erklären wir Ihnen das neue Lizenzmodell.
Nehmen Sie an diesem Webinar teil, bei dem HCL-Ambassador Marc Thomas und Gastredner Franz Walder Ihnen diese neue Welt näherbringen. Es vermittelt Ihnen die Tools und das Know-how, um den Überblick zu bewahren. Sie werden in der Lage sein, Ihre Kosten durch eine optimierte Domino-Konfiguration zu reduzieren und auch in Zukunft gering zu halten.
Diese Themen werden behandelt
- Reduzierung der Lizenzkosten durch Auffinden und Beheben von Fehlkonfigurationen und überflüssigen Konten
- Wie funktionieren CCB- und CCX-Lizenzen wirklich?
- Verstehen des DLAU-Tools und wie man es am besten nutzt
- Tipps für häufige Problembereiche, wie z. B. Team-Postfächer, Funktions-/Testbenutzer usw.
- Praxisbeispiele und Best Practices zum sofortigen Umsetzen
Astute Business Solutions | Oracle Cloud Partner |
Your goto partner for Oracle Cloud, PeopleSoft, E-Business Suite, and Ellucian Banner. We are a firm specialized in managed services and consulting.
Connector Corner: Seamlessly power UiPath Apps, GenAI with prebuilt connectors
Join us to learn how UiPath Apps can directly and easily interact with prebuilt connectors via Integration Service--including Salesforce, ServiceNow, Open GenAI, and more.
The best part is you can achieve this without building a custom workflow! Say goodbye to the hassle of using separate automations to call APIs. By seamlessly integrating within App Studio, you can now easily streamline your workflow, while gaining direct access to our Connector Catalog of popular applications.
We’ll discuss and demo the benefits of UiPath Apps and connectors including:
Creating a compelling user experience for any software, without the limitations of APIs.
Accelerating the app creation process, saving time and effort
Enjoying high-performance CRUD (create, read, update, delete) operations, for
seamless data management.
Speakers:
Russell Alfeche, Technology Leader, RPA at qBotic and UiPath MVP
Charlie Greenberg, host
Apps Break Data
How information systems are built or acquired puts information, which is what they should be about, in a secondary place. Our language adapted accordingly, and we no longer talk about information systems but applications. Applications evolved in a way to break data into diverse fragments, tightly coupled with applications and expensive to integrate. The result is technical debt, which is re-paid by taking even bigger "loans", resulting in an ever-increasing technical debt. Software engineering and procurement practices work in sync with market forces to maintain this trend. This talk demonstrates how natural this situation is. The question is: can something be done to reverse the trend?
Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)
An English 🇬🇧 translation of a presentation to the speech I gave about the main changes brought by CCS TSI 2023 at the biggest Czech conference on Communications and signalling systems on Railways, which was held in Clarion Hotel Olomouc from 7th to 9th November 2023 (konferenceszt.cz). Attended by around 500 participants and 200 on-line followers.
The original Czech 🇨🇿 version of the presentation can be found here: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/hlavni-novinky-souvisejici-s-ccs-tsi-2023-2023-1695/269688092 .
The videorecording (in Czech) from the presentation is available here: https://youtu.be/WzjJWm4IyPk?si=SImb06tuXGb30BEH .
Digital Banking in the Cloud: How Citizens Bank Unlocked Their Mainframe
Inconsistent user experience and siloed data, high costs, and changing customer expectations – Citizens Bank was experiencing these challenges while it was attempting to deliver a superior digital banking experience for its clients. Its core banking applications run on the mainframe and Citizens was using legacy utilities to get the critical mainframe data to feed customer-facing channels, like call centers, web, and mobile. Ultimately, this led to higher operating costs (MIPS), delayed response times, and longer time to market.
Ever-changing customer expectations demand more modern digital experiences, and the bank needed to find a solution that could provide real-time data to its customer channels with low latency and operating costs. Join this session to learn how Citizens is leveraging Precisely to replicate mainframe data to its customer channels and deliver on their “modern digital bank” experiences.
Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success Story
Are you ready to revolutionize how you handle data? Join us for a webinar where we’ll bring you up to speed with the latest advancements in Generative AI technology and discover how leveraging FME with tools from giants like Google Gemini, Amazon, and Microsoft OpenAI can supercharge your workflow efficiency.
During the hour, we’ll take you through:
Guest Speaker Segment with Hannah Barrington: Dive into the world of dynamic real estate marketing with Hannah, the Marketing Manager at Workspace Group. Hear firsthand how their team generates engaging descriptions for thousands of office units by integrating diverse data sources—from PDF floorplans to web pages—using FME transformers, like OpenAIVisionConnector and AnthropicVisionConnector. This use case will show you how GenAI can streamline content creation for marketing across the board.
Ollama Use Case: Learn how Scenario Specialist Dmitri Bagh has utilized Ollama within FME to input data, create custom models, and enhance security protocols. This segment will include demos to illustrate the full capabilities of FME in AI-driven processes.
Custom AI Models: Discover how to leverage FME to build personalized AI models using your data. Whether it’s populating a model with local data for added security or integrating public AI tools, find out how FME facilitates a versatile and secure approach to AI.
We’ll wrap up with a live Q&A session where you can engage with our experts on your specific use cases, and learn more about optimizing your data workflows with AI.
This webinar is ideal for professionals seeking to harness the power of AI within their data management systems while ensuring high levels of customization and security. Whether you're a novice or an expert, gain actionable insights and strategies to elevate your data processes. Join us to see how FME and AI can revolutionize how you work with data!
“Temporal Event Neural Networks: A More Efficient Alternative to the Transfor...
“Temporal Event Neural Networks: A More Efficient Alternative to the Transfor...Edge AI and Vision Alliance
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/temporal-event-neural-networks-a-more-efficient-alternative-to-the-transformer-a-presentation-from-brainchip/
Chris Jones, Director of Product Management at BrainChip , presents the “Temporal Event Neural Networks: A More Efficient Alternative to the Transformer” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
The expansion of AI services necessitates enhanced computational capabilities on edge devices. Temporal Event Neural Networks (TENNs), developed by BrainChip, represent a novel and highly efficient state-space network. TENNs demonstrate exceptional proficiency in handling multi-dimensional streaming data, facilitating advancements in object detection, action recognition, speech enhancement and language model/sequence generation. Through the utilization of polynomial-based continuous convolutions, TENNs streamline models, expedite training processes and significantly diminish memory requirements, achieving notable reductions of up to 50x in parameters and 5,000x in energy consumption compared to prevailing methodologies like transformers.
Integration with BrainChip’s Akida neuromorphic hardware IP further enhances TENNs’ capabilities, enabling the realization of highly capable, portable and passively cooled edge devices. This presentation delves into the technical innovations underlying TENNs, presents real-world benchmarks, and elucidates how this cutting-edge approach is positioned to revolutionize edge AI across diverse applications.Generating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and Milvus
During this demo, the founders of Secludy will demonstrate how their system utilizes Milvus to store and manipulate embeddings for generating privacy-protected synthetic data. Their approach not only maintains the confidentiality of the original data but also enhances the utility and scalability of LLMs under privacy constraints. Attendees, including machine learning engineers, data scientists, and data managers, will witness first-hand how Secludy's integration with Milvus empowers organizations to harness the power of LLMs securely and efficiently.
Artificial Intelligence and Electronic Warfare
Artificial Intelligence and Electronic WarfarePapadakis K.-Cyber-Information Warfare Analyst & Cyber Defense/Security Consultant-Hellenic MoD
AI & Electronic WarfareFreshworks Rethinks NoSQL for Rapid Scaling & Cost-Efficiency
Freshworks creates AI-boosted business software that helps employees work more efficiently and effectively. Managing data across multiple RDBMS and NoSQL databases was already a challenge at their current scale. To prepare for 10X growth, they knew it was time to rethink their database strategy. Learn how they architected a solution that would simplify scaling while keeping costs under control.
Fueling AI with Great Data with Airbyte Webinar
This talk will focus on how to collect data from a variety of sources, leveraging this data for RAG and other GenAI use cases, and finally charting your course to productionalization.
Harnessing the Power of NLP and Knowledge Graphs for Opioid Research
Gursev Pirge, PhD
Senior Data Scientist - JohnSnowLabs
[OReilly Superstream] Occupy the Space: A grassroots guide to engineering (an...
The typical problem in product engineering is not bad strategy, so much as “no strategy”. This leads to confusion, lack of motivation, and incoherent action. The next time you look for a strategy and find an empty space, instead of waiting for it to be filled, I will show you how to fill it in yourself. If you’re wrong, it forces a correction. If you’re right, it helps create focus. I’ll share how I’ve approached this in the past, both what works and lessons for what didn’t work so well.
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Prompting language models is hard, while programming language models is easy. In this talk, I will discuss the state-of-the-art framework DSPy for programming foundation models with its powerful optimizers and runtime constraint system.
Principle of conventional tomography-Bibash Shahi ppt..pptx
before the computed tomography, it had been widely used.
Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing.pdf
Read Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing to gain insights on AI adoption in the manufacturing industry, such as:
1. How quickly AI is being implemented in manufacturing.
2. Which barriers stand in the way of AI adoption.
3. How data quality and governance form the backbone of AI.
4. Organizational processes and structures that may inhibit effective AI adoption.
6. Ideas and approaches to help build your organization's AI strategy.
Dandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity server
This slide deck presents DLHT, a concurrent in-memory hashtable. Despite efforts to optimize hashtables, that go as far as sacrificing core functionality, state-of-the-art designs still incur multiple memory accesses per request and block request processing in three cases. First, most hashtables block while waiting for data to be retrieved from memory. Second, open-addressing designs, which represent the current state-of-the-art, either cannot free index slots on deletes or must block all requests to do so. Third, index resizes block every request until all objects are copied to the new index. Defying folklore wisdom, DLHT forgoes open-addressing and adopts a fully-featured and memory-aware closed-addressing design based on bounded cache-line-chaining. This design offers lock-free index operations and deletes that free slots instantly, (2) completes most requests with a single memory access, (3) utilizes software prefetching to hide memory latencies, and (4) employs a novel non-blocking and parallel resizing. In a commodity server and a memory-resident workload, DLHT surpasses 1.6B requests per second and provides 3.5x (12x) the throughput of the state-of-the-art closed-addressing (open-addressing) resizable hashtable on Gets (Deletes).
Recently uploaded (20)
JavaLand 2024: Application Development Green Masterplan
JavaLand 2024: Application Development Green Masterplan
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAU
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAU
Astute Business Solutions | Oracle Cloud Partner |
Astute Business Solutions | Oracle Cloud Partner |
Connector Corner: Seamlessly power UiPath Apps, GenAI with prebuilt connectors
Connector Corner: Seamlessly power UiPath Apps, GenAI with prebuilt connectors
Digital Banking in the Cloud: How Citizens Bank Unlocked Their Mainframe
Digital Banking in the Cloud: How Citizens Bank Unlocked Their Mainframe
Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success Story
Driving Business Innovation: Latest Generative AI Advancements & Success Story
“Temporal Event Neural Networks: A More Efficient Alternative to the Transfor...
“Temporal Event Neural Networks: A More Efficient Alternative to the Transfor...
Generating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and Milvus
Generating privacy-protected synthetic data using Secludy and Milvus
Freshworks Rethinks NoSQL for Rapid Scaling & Cost-Efficiency
Freshworks Rethinks NoSQL for Rapid Scaling & Cost-Efficiency
Harnessing the Power of NLP and Knowledge Graphs for Opioid Research
Harnessing the Power of NLP and Knowledge Graphs for Opioid Research
[OReilly Superstream] Occupy the Space: A grassroots guide to engineering (an...
[OReilly Superstream] Occupy the Space: A grassroots guide to engineering (an...
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Principle of conventional tomography-Bibash Shahi ppt..pptx
Principle of conventional tomography-Bibash Shahi ppt..pptx
Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...
Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...
Dandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity server
Dandelion Hashtable: beyond billion requests per second on a commodity server
L.O.W Reliable Sites
- 1. L.O.W AKA LOVELL-KNIGHT, OGILVIE, WALKER
- 2. Task.... Don't you find it anoying how your teachers won't let you go any site? Well why don't you find out how to tell the diference between good and bad sites. This will let you have more acsess to the internet and save you the long (not to say boring) trips to the library.
- 3. Good Websites Should Say.... 1) Is it clear who has written the information. 2) Are the aims of the site clear. 3) Does the site achieve it's aims. 4) Is the site relevant to me. (does it have the info i want) 5) Can the information be checked. 6) When was the site produced. 7) Is the information baised (one sided) in any way. 8) Does the site tell you about choices open to you.
- 4. How to evaluate a website.... Firstly check when the website was made and when the website was last updated. If the site was last updated around 5 years ago it probaly won't be very good. The website should say if they are qualified to produce the site and what qualifications this person has. Most good sites will have somthing so that you can contact the people who created the site (by phone or e-mail). This is so that you can tell them if something is not right. You also should be able to view the website for free and not have to download any software. It should have limited avertising otherwise half of the site are adverts so there won't be much info. To check when the site was made you should go to: http://www.archive.org/web/web.php To help dertime who produced the site go to: http://www.archive.org/web/web.php
- 6. Hate Groups.... Hate groups are organized groups which publish bad things about websites. People often believe this information and then don't go to that website. It is their opinion that the website is bad, horrible and does not give good information or either they for some reason don't like the website. They hate the site for very stupid reasons such as religion or anything like that. Many organizations are tracking down them so that the internet will become safer and more reliable. To check if the site you are using is sponsered by a hate group go to: http://www.bcpl.net/~rfrankli/hate.htm
- 7. Conclusion.... As you can see, the internet can be an excellent and reliable place to get information from. There are many ways to check if you are in doubt over a website so therefore us (children) should be allowed to use the internet more.
- 8. Thank You for watching our presentation!! We hope you now can tell the difference between reliable and non-reliable websites!!!