1. Om Prakash has filed a petition in the Supreme Court of India challenging his illegal termination from Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. in 2014 without notice or compensation.
2. He had previously filed a lawsuit in the Patiala House Court in New Delhi regarding his termination, but alleges the court is pressuring him to withdraw key aspects of his case or transfer it to the Delhi High Court.
3. Prakash claims his termination and the court's actions violate his fundamental rights to equality, non-discrimination, and life and liberty under Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. He is asking the Supreme Court to intervene.
IS IT NOT A WELL DESIGNED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY BY THE REGISTRAR SECTION X OF S...Om Prakash Poddar
Certified copy of office report dated 20.10.2016 in writ petition criminal 136 of 2016 issued by registrar section x of supreme court of India along with applications with Affidavit dated 03.10.16 & 18.10.16
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supr...Om Prakash Poddar
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supreme Court of India for refusal to register Writ (Criminal) D.NO.2188 of 2017
IS IT NOT A WELL DESIGNED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY BY THE REGISTRAR SECTION X OF S...Om Prakash Poddar
Certified copy of office report dated 20.10.2016 in writ petition criminal 136 of 2016 issued by registrar section x of supreme court of India along with applications with Affidavit dated 03.10.16 & 18.10.16
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supr...Om Prakash Poddar
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supreme Court of India for refusal to register Writ (Criminal) D.NO.2188 of 2017
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016Om Prakash Poddar
True Copy of Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 filed before Supreme Court of India dated 30th August 2016 against the State of Bihar for Quashing of criminal complaint case(P) 5591 of 2013 pending at SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai CJM division Bihar.
Information on technology solutions associate program for schoolsUofTEngKomp
Meet the recruiting managers and other TD representatives @ the TDxWISE Recruitment Event. For more information, visit http://tdwiserecruitment.eventbrite.ca
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016Om Prakash Poddar
True Copy of Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 filed before Supreme Court of India dated 30th August 2016 against the State of Bihar for Quashing of criminal complaint case(P) 5591 of 2013 pending at SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai CJM division Bihar.
Information on technology solutions associate program for schoolsUofTEngKomp
Meet the recruiting managers and other TD representatives @ the TDxWISE Recruitment Event. For more information, visit http://tdwiserecruitment.eventbrite.ca
Робототехнический центр «Сколково» основательно подготовился к Startup Village 2015. Перед началом конференции ее гостям было обещано множество сюрпризов, и все они были реализованы. В специальной робозоне, организованной Робоцентром, посетители Startup Village могли встретить играющего в футбол человека в экзоскелете, ожившего математика Алана Тьюринга, а также познакомиться с интересными российскими робототехническими стартапами.
The U.S. Presidential Election of 2016: The Great Democratic Hope of Deceptionhumbertogomezsequeira
Essay on Hope as the Great Democratic Deception—represented by the Brand Obama Administration—and violent coup d'é·tat against the people to convert the State into the Robber Barons' legislative and war machine.
The U.S. Presidential Election of 2016: The Voters Dependence on the Statehumbertogomezsequeira
Essay on the voters dependence on the State that strengthens the capacity of the plutocracy to dominate them and use them as the cannon fodder of its for profit war machine operated by its Democrat and Republican lackeys.
El mundo real en el aula, con la ayuda del profesorMicael Gallego
Presentación en las Jornadas de Innovación y TIC Educativas: JITICE 2016 de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos.
Aplicación de Project Based Learning y Flipped Classroom en la asignatura de "Desarrollo Web" en el Grado de Ingeniería del Software
Petition before Prime Minister of India dated 23.08.2017Om Prakash Poddar
WITH A PRAYER TO IMPEACH THE CONCERNED JUDGES FOR ISSUING NON BAIL ABLE WARRANT (N. B. W) DATED 08TH SEPT 2011 UNDER SECTION 83 CR.PC. IN CRIMINAL CASE COMPLAINT (P) NO 5591 OF 2013 AT SDJM COURT NO. 16 BEGUSARAI BIHAR AND KEEPING IT SECRET SINCE THEN EVEN AFTER THE ON RECORD INTIMATION TO THE CJM DIVISION BEGUSARAI IN THE SAME MATTER CRIMINAL CASE COMPLAINT (P) NO. 9P OF 2010 DATED 03RD MARCH 2011 AND AFTER THE SETTLEMENT OF THE SAME MATTER BY THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI IN MATT APPL 7 OF 2012 ON 23RD JULY 2013
WE ARE LIVING AS REFUGEE IN DELHI BECAUSE OF FORCED DISLOCATION BY THE STATE
THE PETITION WITHOUT SOFT COPY OF ANNEXURES AS HARD COPY OF SAME ANNEXURES FROM P 1 TO P 18 HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED BEFORE HON'BLE PRESIDENT OF INDIA WITH THE PETITION Sl. No. P1/ B/ 0108170053 ON 27TH JULY 2017
Petition before Hon'ble President of India dated 27.07.2017Om Prakash Poddar
Petition before Hon'ble President of India AFTER the Writ Petition (Criminal)D 3913 of 2017 before Supreme Court of India against Registrar Supreme Court of India for shielding Judicial Magistrate of Begusarai of Bihar
Nexus of rtd justice s.b. sinha and praveen kumar idas to cgdaOm Prakash Poddar
Nexus of Rtd Justice S.B. Sinha & Praveen Kumar (IDAS) to kill me and my oxygen dependent mother in the defense area of Palam New Delhi and to usurp our property in Bihar has been apprised to Controller General Defense Accounts, Government of India to take departmental action against Praveen Kumar (IDAS)
First appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Registrar (J-I) Supreme Court of Indi...Om Prakash Poddar
First appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Registrar (J-I) Supreme Court of India for REFUSAL OF REGISTRATION OF WRIT CRIMINAL AGAINST UNION OF INDIA D.NO.2188 OF 2017
Aggrieved by the reply of Adl. Registrar & CPIO, Supreme Court of India dated 04.03.2017, appellant preferred First Appeal against CPIO of Supreme Court of India dated 07.03.2017 before Ld. Registrar (Admin) & First Appellate Authority (FAA) Supreme Court of India at New Delhi.
Interlocutory Application dated 9.10.22 for Cancellation of NBW before SC.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
Recall the order dated 25.08.2010 and 08.09.2011, whereby Non-Bailaible Warrants were issued against the petitioner Om Prakash and his mother Asha Rani Devi by Begusarai Court under the judicature of Patna High Court in 9-P/2010 and 397c/2011 (Criminal Case Complaint (P) no. 5591/2013) case and Cancel the Non-Bailaible Warrants issued against the Petitioner and his mother to eradicate Prostitution and International Sex Racket.
Application (I.A.No.164340) for Non Bailable Warrant dated 01.11.2022 SC.pdfOmPrakashPoddar1
Non Bailable Warrant issued kept secret and maintained since 2010 to confiscate my Property, to push my families into prostitution and to kill my parents including me.
RTI dated 7.12.22 against suppression of Gang Rape matter.pdfOmPrakashPoddar1
Supreme Court of India is main accused in Non Bail able Warrant and Gang Rape matter W.P.(Crl.) D.NO. 18546/2022. Sixteen petitions (SLP. Writ, Review, Curative and M.A) have been filed against interlinked with this matter since 2012 to till date, yet no rescue of 18 year ago kidnapped pregnant wife Rina Kumari (Guddi) and abducted unseen minor daughter from the clutches of sex Abusers State by Supreme Court of India and Union of India as on date
Petition before Hon'ble President of India dated 11.05.2016Om Prakash Poddar
Petition before Hon'ble President of India prior to Writ Petition (Criminal) 136 of 2016 before Supreme Court of India against Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai Bihar
Second Appeal dated 06 04 2017 against SC before CIC New DelhiOm Prakash Poddar
Second Appeal vide D.NO. 122864 dated 06.04.2017 before CIC New Delhi against Registrar Supreme Court of India for refusal of Registration of Writ (Criminal) D.NO.2188 of 2017 entitled "OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS"
Refiled Criminal Appeal by way of Motion D.NO. 26314 dated 28.03.2017Om Prakash Poddar
Notification of defects letter D.NO. 840/2017/X dated 22.03.2017 is being emailed by the Registrar Section X on 27.03.2017 to the petitioner. Petitioner Cured the notified defects and Refiled Criminal Appeal by way of Motion vide D.NO. 26314 dated 28.03.2017 with six paper books for two applications separately.
This include some important formats applicable in Indian courts and is very essential for Law Students.
These formats may even be translated to the local (scheduled) indian languages and may be used in the respective courts.
Reply to Election Commission Delhi in NGS5322435639 dated 25.11.2022.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
ERO Ms. Sunita Raj mobile no. 9650058340 59-Vishwas Nagar Constituency Sahadra district at East Delhi has admitted this fact that she has sent her man for making a fake voters under the legal guardianship of Complainant on 24.11.2022 at Shelter Home DUSIB Code No.214 near Anand Vihar ISBT Delhi. Hence, your BLO will disclose the name and address of person for whom he wanted to make fake Voter ID with ulterior motives.
112 call has been made against your fraud BLO dated 24.11.2022 with unique reference no. 6161038, PCR Petrol Vehicle ROMO9A mobile no. 7428002509 at 19.32.34pm. Anand Vihar policeman mobile number is 8595888677. Police had taken him to the police station. Hence police has recorded his name and address and motives behind it.
Inquiry officer Balveer Singh mobile no. 9654963400 of Patpatganj Industrial Area Police Station near Anand Vihar ISBT Delhi will provide you the name and address of person who had come to make a fake voters under the legal guardianship of Complainant.
Your fraud BLO did not disclose his identity before complainant.
Complaint dated 27.11.2022 to Commissioner of Polic Delhi.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
TAKE the cognizance of obvious links between Ms. Sunita Raj, BLO Anand Vihar and Mr. Manish Raj with this International Sex Racket and direct to concern SHO to register an F.I.R against the accused under relevant sections of IPC.
112 call dated 24.11.2022 at 19.32.34pm with unique reference no. 6161038 and subsequent Complaint dated 25.11.2022 to the Commissioner of Police Delhi dated 25.11.2022 discloses links with Mr. Manish Raj son of Chief Minister of Jharkhand in this International Sex Racket
Suppression of crucial records in Office Report dated 26.11.2022 in W.P. (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 listed for hearing on 28.11.2022 before Chamber Judge HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, Court No.15 CL.NO.1748 may lead to dismissal of petition.
Registry has only recorded the records to defend its heinous work in the Office Report dated 26.11.2022 hiding all the factual crucial records filed by the petitioner even after his reminder though e-filed letter dated 22.11.2022 addressed to Branch Officer and Assistant Registrar Section X
Office Report dated 26.11.2022 in International Sex Racket matter Writ Petit...Om Prakash Poddar
Registry has recorded records in his favor only and has ignored the crucial records of petitioner deliberately to dismiss the petition by default.
Office Report dated 26.11.2022 for the hearing of Writ Petition Criminal Diary No. 18646/2022 on 28.11.2022 has been made hiding the crucial records filed by the petitioner.
Office Report dated 28.11.2022 in International Sex Racket matter Writ Petit...Om Prakash Poddar
Office Report has been made hiding crucial records of petitioner. Registry has recorded his own record only and has deliberately ignored the record of petitioner to dismiss the petition by default.
Complaint dated 26.11.22 against Election Officer Katihar Bihar.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
a fake voter identity card has been created by BLO Part-220, Ward No.03, 64-Kadwa Constituency Katihar Bihar vide EPIC No. TYGO395244 against the Complainant. Complainant has figured out malpractices of BLO and submitted requisite form before BLO Gopal Malik mobile no. 9507949474 dated 17.12.2021 for deletion of his name from the voter list to suppress the practice of multiple voter identity cards across the Country.
Complaint dated 25.11.22 against Election Officer Sahadra Delhi.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
Sex abuser Manish from Election Commission Delhi took my Aadhar Card by fraud to make Voter ID for my kidnapped minor daughter marking me as a legal guardian under Vishwas Nagar Constituency at Sahadra district of East Delhi.
Praying from you to direct the registry to supply the fixed date of hearing to the petitioner in person in writing in Non Bailable and Gang Rape matter W.P. Criminal Diary No. 18546/2022 so that he can plan his travel for home
Letter dated 22.11.2022 to Branch Officer Section 10 at Supreme Court of Ind...Om Prakash Poddar
Take all 84 e-filed legal documents with effect from 07.06.2022 to 22.11.2022 along with physical filed legal document with effect from 14.06.2022 to till date on Record of office report for the date of hearing on 25.11.2022
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 25.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed deliberately by Supreme Court of India with ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 25.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional filed Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed by Supreme Court of India with an ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 07.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional filed Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed by Supreme Court of India with ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
E-Filed Petition dated 07.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Supreme Court ...Om Prakash Poddar
All Annexes, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Petitioner has e-filed 10 legal documents on 7.6.2022 and 84 Additional legal documents till 22.11.2022 in Provisional Application no. 12939-2022 and Writ Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 before Supreme Court of India which has not been taken into record of office report dated 24.09.2022 and has not been entered into Writ Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 at the website in the public domain. Hence, crucial records have been suppressed deliberately with ulterior motive.
Complaint dated 21.11.2022 against Bihar and Delhi police to NHRC.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
#Internationalsexracket
National Human Rights Commission New Delhi, take action against kidnapping, abduction and Gang Rape of my families and minor daughters.
E-filed status dated 15.11.22 before Supreme Court of India.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
E-filed Important legal documents like Interlocutory Applications for additional grounds and cancellation of Non Bailable Warrant has not been entered into Physical filing case record Writ Petition Criminal Diary No. 18546/2022 to present the wrong fact before the Chamber Judge on 25.11.2022
Complaint aginst Delhi Police to NHRC New Delhi dated 20.11.22.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
ABDUCTION/RAPE by Police
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Hence, register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
ABDUCTION/RAPE by Police case.
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters. Hence, register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
Register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
Writ Petition Criminal Diary Number 18546 of 2022 Part-I .pdfOm Prakash Poddar
International Sex Racket and Anti-Prostitution Petition before Supreme Court of India.
These five are key people and will reveal all records in this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Register F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court New Delhi.
Writ Petition Criminal Diary Number 18546 of 2022 Part-I .pdf
LETTER PETITION IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 9TH JANUARY 2016
1. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CIVIL WRIT PETITON NO. OF 2016
IN THE MATTER OF:
Om Prakash …………..PETITIONER
VERSUS
Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd ….RESPONDENT
POSITION OF THE PARITES
BEFORE THE CIVIL COURT OF Ld. MS KIRAN GUPTA, SCJ
PATIALA HOUSE COURT AT NEW DELHI BEFORE THIS COURT
BETWEEN
Om Prakash ………….PETITIONER
S/O Late Sh Deep Narayan Poddar
R/O RZF-893, Netaji Sbhash Marg
Raj Nagar Part-2, Palam Colony
New Delhi-110077
VERSUES
1. IDPL Govt of India ….RESPONDENT No.01
2. Through
Shri Praveen Kumar
C&MD, Indian Drugs &
Pharmaceuticals Ltd, H.O.
Scope Complex, Core-6, 1st
Floor
7 Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003
2.Shri R.L.Sharma ….RESPONDENT No.02
Personnel Manager, Indian Drugs &
Pharmaceuticals Ltd, H.O.
Scope Complex, Core-6, 1st
Floor
7 Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003
3. Shri A.K.Karn ….RESPONDENT No.03
Under Secretary,
Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers
Department of Pharmaceuticals
Section Officer-PI-IV
Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-110001
PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF
INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF
MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION OR CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER
APPROPRIATE WRIT FOR ENFORCEMENT OF ARTICLE 14, 15
and 21 OF THE CONSTITUTIION OF INDIA.
To
3. Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India and His
Lordship's Companion Justices of the
Supreme Court of India. The Humble
petition of the Petitioner abovenamed.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHEWETH:
1. That the petitioner in person has
filed a suit vide case no. 201 of 2015 titled
as Om Prakash Vs Indian Drugs Pharmaceuticals
Ltd, before the court of Ld. Senior Civil
Judge, Ms. Kiran Gupta, Court No.14, Patiala
House Court at New Delhi on 02.07.2015 against
Indian Drugs Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Department of
Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemical &
Fertilizers, Government of India. The suit is
against an illegal termination of service of
the petitioner dated 08.12.2014 violating the
principles of natural justice by Chairman &
Managing Director, Mr. Praveen Kumar, an IDAS
(Indian Defense Account Service) who is on
deputation with Indian Drugs Pharmaceuticals
Ltd for decree of reinstatement with full back
wages declaring the termination void, u/s 15,
73, 74 & 75 of Indian Contract Act 1872.
2. That the crux of the whole
4. petition is the increasing magnitude of the
contractual white color employees due to
Government Policy in the present market
scenario in absence of any specific legislation
which governs the employment and working
conditions of white color workers which makes
them vulnerable in the hands of Power elite is
the thrust area of the petition.
3. That this petition is in
continuation of his previous court complaint
dated 09.11.2015 and Writ petition in letter
form dated 26.12.2015.
4. That the petitioner has filed an
application to return the plaint for complying
with the requirements under Section 80 (1) of
CPC under Order VII Rule 10 Subject to
provision 10-A under sub-rule (2) with a
permission and liberty to file the present suit
before the appropriate jurisdiction within 90
days dated 14.12.2015. A copy of application
dated 14.12.2015 under Order VII Rule 10 is
annexed herein as Annexure P-1. (Page
from……………….to…………………)
5. 5. That the respondent and Ld. Judge
both are mounting pressure over petitioner to
withdraw the petition, dictating to invoke
Article 226 instead of Article 32, pressurizing
to transfer the petition to Delhi High Court,
emphasizing to amend the para 1, 2 and 3 of the
application, which are against the respondent and
the Ld. court on the subsequent dates of hearing
dated 16.12.2015, 19.12.2015 and 08.01.2016.
Counsels on behalf of the Respondents, Mr. Pankaj
Aggarwal and Ms Sushma Singh categorially warned
the Ld. Judge in front of the petitioner not to
allow the application without withdrawal of para
1, 2 and 3 from the application, otherwise all
three would be trapped badly i.e. Judicial Staff,
Ld. Judge and counsels on behalf of the
respondents No. 01 and 02.
6.That this petition had come with a cause of
action against the arbitrary and discriminatory
action of state which has ignored and set aside
the Audi Alterm Partum Rule, which violates
Article 14 interlinked with Article 21 and
Article 15 of constitution of India.
7.That the petitioner is a contractual white-
collar employee and management of IDPL has not
6. let him to discharge his duties and terminated
his contract within one month without payment
of single penny. His contract period is
continuing from 21.05.2014 to 21.05.2017. In
the absence of any specific statue or
principles governing employment of white-collar
workers except the basic provisions applicable
under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and
judicial precedents, regarding the legality and
sanctity of the contractual termination
provisions, petitioner moved to Patiala House
court on 02.07.2015 after exploring the
internal available remedies through
Administrative reform mechanisms.
8.That the petition was marked to Ld. District
Judge however the filing counter asked the
petitioner to mark it to Ld. SCJ and come after
one day because maintainability of the suit is
questionable, hence required another one day
for assessment.
9.That the petitioner appeared before the Ld. SCJ
Kiran Gupta at 14:00 PM on the next day dated
03.07.2015. After hearing at length, the
petitioner was informed that the suit is
maintainable in this court, hence suit was
7. instituted.
10. That the Ld. court has deliberately
exempted and not served the court summon/Notice
to the Respondent No.03 Department of
Pharmaceutical, Ministry of Chemical &
Fertilizers, Government of India, who happened
to be the direct administrative controller of
Indian Drugs Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
11. That the suit should have been returned in
July 2015 itself, if the Hon’ble Patiala House
court had no jurisdiction to try this nature of
suit.
12. That this suit is interlinked with the
previous case of the petitioner which he has
fought against the mastermind of Mr. S.B.Sinha
(Retd Chief Justice of Delhi High Court and
Retd Justice of Supreme court of India) and
against whom he has filed three SLP(C)
N0.9854/2012, SLP(C) N0. 9483/2013 and SLP(C)
N0. 19073/2013 before the Hon’ble Supreme Court
of India.
13. That the petitioner has been
8. denied access to the services of legal aid at
all the three levels of legal aid institutions
in India. (i) True copy of CIC order dated
25.09.2014 vide CIC/SS/A/2013/901846-SA, (ii)
True copy of letter vide No. A-60011(3)/1/2014-
Admin. III/LAP (JUS), Ministry of Law &
Justice, Department of Justice dated 13.04.2015
to the Member Secretary, National Legal Service
Authority (NALSA) (iii) True copy of letter
from National Legal Service Authority (NALSA)
vide Dy.No.492(a)/NALSA/LA-2015/1166dated
13.05.2015 to the Secretary, Supreme Court
Legal Service Committee, vide
Dy.No.492(b)/NALSA/LA-2015/1156 dated
13.05.2015 to the Secretary, Delhi High Court
Legal Service Committee and vide
Dy.No.492(c)/NALSA/LA-2015/1159dated 13.05.2015
to the Member Secretary, Delhi State Legal
Services Authority are annexed herein as
Annexure P(Colly)-2. (Page from……………..to…………….)
14. That the respondent belongs to the
lobby/group/network of Mr. S.B. Sinha (Retd
Chief Justice of Delhi High Court and Retd
Justice of Supreme court of India), who is
mastermind behind destroying the life of the
petitioner. He is still consistently offending
9. the petitioner and not letting him to live and
settle down peacefully. Mr. S.B. Sinha and his
associates are taking the help of Government
machinery and misusing it against offending the
petitioner & his old age mother in Bihar as
well as in New Delhi.
15. That Mr. S.B. Sinha and his associates are
offending at personal bank A/C of petitioner’s
mother in SBI, ADB Sonaili Bazar, katihar,
Bihar, offending at LPG Connection agency of
petitioner to hack the confidential data as it
is Aadhar linked with bank A/C of the
petitioner in Delhi, offending at personal
property of petitioner’s mother in Bihar,
offended at petitioner’s father who ultimately
died untimely, offending at petitioner’s
job/service in New Delhi, chasing the
petitioner since 12 years from Bihar to New
Delhi, creating panic amongst neighbors,
friends and relatives of the petitioner with
whom petitioner is trying to establish
relationships to settle down, always keep on
tracking the movement of the petitioner and his
mother etc. In brief, off the record, he is
consistently involved in misusing the network
of Government machinery with his wrong
10. influence and manifesting Mafia raj,
consistently crushing the petitioner and his
mother mentally, they are involved in criminal
conspiracy against the petitioner and his
mother to kill them with an ulterior motive to
usurp the property of the petitioner, as the
petitioner is now left with one member in his
family i.e. ailing mother only.
16. That the petitioner even after
getting Judgment on 23.07.2013 by the Hon’ble
High Curt of Delhi with the help of Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India could not come out of
the curse of heinous crime committed by Mr.
S.B.Sinha and his associates every day.
Petitioner is vulnerable common man therefore
has become their soft target.
17. That the life and liberty of the
petitioner is at stake and being detained at
(rented accommodation) home without livelihood
because he cannot take gainful employment
during the continuation of his employment
contract period and during the pendency of his
case. Hence, petitioner is reeling under
criminal conspiracy of respondent who are
mounting pressure to withdraw or amend the
11. present application under Order VII Rule 10.
18. That moving under the Article 32
itself is a fundamental right of the
petitioner. Hence, illegal detention by the Ld.
court below in the garb of under consideration
and extending dates after date and mounting
pressure over the vulnerable petitioner to
derail from Article 32 to Article 226 and
withdraw to amend the present application
infringes the fundamental rights of the
petitioner.
-:PRAYER:-
In the above premises, it is prayed that this
Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
(i) to issue appropriate writ against such
offence, repeatedly committed by the
power elite against the vulnerable
common man and may issue appropriate
direction to dispose of the
application under order VII Rule 10
pending before Ld. Patiala House
Court, New Delhi and ensure the right
of the petitioner to invoke its
jurisdiction under Article 32 of the
12. constitution of India for enforcement
of the Fundamental Rights under
Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the
petitioner.
(ii) to pass such other orders and further
orders as may be deemed necessary on
the facts and in the circumstances of
the case.
FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE
PETITIONER SHALL AS INDUTY BOUND, EVER
PRAY.
DRAWN & FILED BY:
PETITIONER IN PERSON
OM PRAKASH
NEW DELHI:
FILED ON : 09.01.2016