Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016Om Prakash Poddar
True Copy of Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 filed before Supreme Court of India dated 30th August 2016 against the State of Bihar for Quashing of criminal complaint case(P) 5591 of 2013 pending at SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai CJM division Bihar.
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supr...Om Prakash Poddar
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supreme Court of India for refusal to register Writ (Criminal) D.NO.2188 of 2017
Curative petition criminal before supreme court of india filed on 09.12.2016 ...Om Prakash Poddar
Curative petition criminal before supreme court of India has been filed on 09.12.2016 vide diary no. 41026 WITHOUT certificate by Sr. Advocate violating the the guidelines laid down in Rupa Ashok Hurra Vs Ashok Hurra 2002 (4) SCC 388. It is further submitted under para 15 of the Curative Petition Criminal that the Certificate by Sr. Advocate has not been filed by the petitioner because of the valid and unavoidable reasons which has been caused by this Hon’ble Court. The petitioner has been pushed into the Curative stage intentionally by this Hon’ble Court to close the door of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioner no.01 and 02 in the garb of certificate by Sr. Advocate, as the petitioner had refused to engage any legal Aid Advocate against this matter in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016. The mentioning officer of this Hon’ble Court has stopped the petitioner no.02 who was eligible to mention the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s court and Registry has circulated unregistered Interlocutory Application for constitution bench dated 18.10.2016 vide diary no. 77878 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016. Further Registry has suppressed the record of application dated 03.10.2016 for urgent mentioning of the matter and urgent relief sought before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India filed by the petitioner on behalf of petitioner no.02 as per the guidelines and grounds laid down in the Handbook of this Hon’ble Court. Registry did not surrender the file before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court which has been disclosed through certified copy of the office report dated 20.10.2016 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016. Hence, Mentioning Officer and Registry both have spoiled the valid ground of Constitution bench and mentioning the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court to make it liable to be dismissed with liberty by the two judge bench violating the Order XXXV of Supreme Court Rule 1966. In other words, petitioner has been pushed into the Curative stage intentionally by this Hon’ble Court to close the door of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioner no.01 and 02 in the garb of certificate by Sr. Advocate, as the petitioner had refused to engage any legal Aid Advocate against this matter in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016; which has resulted in gross miscarriage of justice. In view of the above mentioned circumstances, Petitioner no. 01 and 02 has been left with no option but to survive or may not survive at the mercy of the GOD.
Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal before Supreme Court of India vide D...Om Prakash Poddar
Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal by way of motion against the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 along with Affidavit and Annexures P-1 to P-5 filed before Supreme Court of India vide D.NO. 45930 dated 05.06.2017
Application for Written Arguments dated 05 06-2020 before Supreme Court of IndiaOm Prakash Poddar
Parties in this Criminal Matter are CORRUPT, CRIMINAL, CROOK JUDGES, ADVOCATES POLICE and BANK OFFICIALS in M.A NO. 583 of 2020 in W.P.(Criminal) 136 of 2016 wherein rights under Article 21 of Constitution of India has been suspended through N.B.W u/s 83 Cr.Pc. causing jurisdictional error deliberately and secretly since 2011 by the State of Bihar and others and wherein Order dated 21.10.2016 in W.P.(Criminal) 136 of 2016 of Supreme Court of India has stood in breach of Article 21 of Constitution of India as a result of that the petitioner no.02 has succumbed to suspicious death on 11.11.2017 and petitioner no.01 is likely to succumb to suspicious death soon because the nexus of state and mafia has organized mob lynching and illegal detention of petitioner and has been compelled to remain underground by these corrupt, criminal, crook and goon’s organs of the state.
Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 dated 30.08.2016Om Prakash Poddar
True Copy of Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 filed before Supreme Court of India dated 30th August 2016 against the State of Bihar for Quashing of criminal complaint case(P) 5591 of 2013 pending at SDJM Court no.16, Begusarai CJM division Bihar.
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supr...Om Prakash Poddar
Writ Petition Criminal NO.......of 2017 vide D.NO.3913 against Registrar Supreme Court of India for refusal to register Writ (Criminal) D.NO.2188 of 2017
Curative petition criminal before supreme court of india filed on 09.12.2016 ...Om Prakash Poddar
Curative petition criminal before supreme court of India has been filed on 09.12.2016 vide diary no. 41026 WITHOUT certificate by Sr. Advocate violating the the guidelines laid down in Rupa Ashok Hurra Vs Ashok Hurra 2002 (4) SCC 388. It is further submitted under para 15 of the Curative Petition Criminal that the Certificate by Sr. Advocate has not been filed by the petitioner because of the valid and unavoidable reasons which has been caused by this Hon’ble Court. The petitioner has been pushed into the Curative stage intentionally by this Hon’ble Court to close the door of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioner no.01 and 02 in the garb of certificate by Sr. Advocate, as the petitioner had refused to engage any legal Aid Advocate against this matter in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016. The mentioning officer of this Hon’ble Court has stopped the petitioner no.02 who was eligible to mention the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s court and Registry has circulated unregistered Interlocutory Application for constitution bench dated 18.10.2016 vide diary no. 77878 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016. Further Registry has suppressed the record of application dated 03.10.2016 for urgent mentioning of the matter and urgent relief sought before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India filed by the petitioner on behalf of petitioner no.02 as per the guidelines and grounds laid down in the Handbook of this Hon’ble Court. Registry did not surrender the file before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court which has been disclosed through certified copy of the office report dated 20.10.2016 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016. Hence, Mentioning Officer and Registry both have spoiled the valid ground of Constitution bench and mentioning the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court to make it liable to be dismissed with liberty by the two judge bench violating the Order XXXV of Supreme Court Rule 1966. In other words, petitioner has been pushed into the Curative stage intentionally by this Hon’ble Court to close the door of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioner no.01 and 02 in the garb of certificate by Sr. Advocate, as the petitioner had refused to engage any legal Aid Advocate against this matter in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016; which has resulted in gross miscarriage of justice. In view of the above mentioned circumstances, Petitioner no. 01 and 02 has been left with no option but to survive or may not survive at the mercy of the GOD.
Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal before Supreme Court of India vide D...Om Prakash Poddar
Application for Urgent Hearing of Appeal by way of motion against the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 in W.P.(Crl.)D.No.3913 of 2017 issued by the Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 along with Affidavit and Annexures P-1 to P-5 filed before Supreme Court of India vide D.NO. 45930 dated 05.06.2017
Application for Written Arguments dated 05 06-2020 before Supreme Court of IndiaOm Prakash Poddar
Parties in this Criminal Matter are CORRUPT, CRIMINAL, CROOK JUDGES, ADVOCATES POLICE and BANK OFFICIALS in M.A NO. 583 of 2020 in W.P.(Criminal) 136 of 2016 wherein rights under Article 21 of Constitution of India has been suspended through N.B.W u/s 83 Cr.Pc. causing jurisdictional error deliberately and secretly since 2011 by the State of Bihar and others and wherein Order dated 21.10.2016 in W.P.(Criminal) 136 of 2016 of Supreme Court of India has stood in breach of Article 21 of Constitution of India as a result of that the petitioner no.02 has succumbed to suspicious death on 11.11.2017 and petitioner no.01 is likely to succumb to suspicious death soon because the nexus of state and mafia has organized mob lynching and illegal detention of petitioner and has been compelled to remain underground by these corrupt, criminal, crook and goon’s organs of the state.
Second True copy of SLP (C) No. 9483 of 2013 before Hon'ble Supreme Court of India for direction to the High Court of Delhi for early date of hearing and early disposal of the case.
Defects Cure letter dated 19.09.2018 to section x SC Om Prakash Poddar
Petitioner is categorically stating that he will not remove the prayer ‘B’ and ‘C’ i.e. [Compliance of Order XXXVIII of Supreme Court Rule 2013 & listing of matter before Constitution bench] from the Misc. Application at any cost.
Written Arguments along with Affidavit before Patna High CourtOm Prakash Poddar
AO NUMBER : 668271/2019 dated 16-10-2019 for Written Arguments along with Affidavit filed before Patna High Court because Judge refused to hear on 14-10-2019
Tools, tips, and techniques to help photographers use their time efficiently by automating the tasks they shouldn't be doing and focusing their efforts on the tasks and processes that grow their business.
Second True copy of SLP (C) No. 9483 of 2013 before Hon'ble Supreme Court of India for direction to the High Court of Delhi for early date of hearing and early disposal of the case.
Defects Cure letter dated 19.09.2018 to section x SC Om Prakash Poddar
Petitioner is categorically stating that he will not remove the prayer ‘B’ and ‘C’ i.e. [Compliance of Order XXXVIII of Supreme Court Rule 2013 & listing of matter before Constitution bench] from the Misc. Application at any cost.
Written Arguments along with Affidavit before Patna High CourtOm Prakash Poddar
AO NUMBER : 668271/2019 dated 16-10-2019 for Written Arguments along with Affidavit filed before Patna High Court because Judge refused to hear on 14-10-2019
Tools, tips, and techniques to help photographers use their time efficiently by automating the tasks they shouldn't be doing and focusing their efforts on the tasks and processes that grow their business.
Refiled Criminal Appeal by way of Motion D.NO. 26314 dated 28.03.2017Om Prakash Poddar
Notification of defects letter D.NO. 840/2017/X dated 22.03.2017 is being emailed by the Registrar Section X on 27.03.2017 to the petitioner. Petitioner Cured the notified defects and Refiled Criminal Appeal by way of Motion vide D.NO. 26314 dated 28.03.2017 with six paper books for two applications separately.
First appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Registrar (J-I) Supreme Court of Indi...Om Prakash Poddar
First appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Registrar (J-I) Supreme Court of India for REFUSAL OF REGISTRATION OF WRIT CRIMINAL AGAINST UNION OF INDIA D.NO.2188 OF 2017
Aggrieved by the reply of Adl. Registrar & CPIO, Supreme Court of India dated 04.03.2017, appellant preferred First Appeal against CPIO of Supreme Court of India dated 07.03.2017 before Ld. Registrar (Admin) & First Appellate Authority (FAA) Supreme Court of India at New Delhi.
IS IT NOT A WELL DESIGNED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY BY THE REGISTRAR SECTION X OF S...Om Prakash Poddar
Certified copy of office report dated 20.10.2016 in writ petition criminal 136 of 2016 issued by registrar section x of supreme court of India along with applications with Affidavit dated 03.10.16 & 18.10.16
Second Appeal dated 06 04 2017 against SC before CIC New DelhiOm Prakash Poddar
Second Appeal vide D.NO. 122864 dated 06.04.2017 before CIC New Delhi against Registrar Supreme Court of India for refusal of Registration of Writ (Criminal) D.NO.2188 of 2017 entitled "OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS"
Review petition criminal in writ petition criminal no.136 of 2016 before su...Om Prakash Poddar
That the Order dated 21.10.2016 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India violated the Part IV of ORDER XXXV of Supreme Court Rules, 1966 which was framed in exercise of the powers conferred by Article 145 of the Constitution. Provision of the Part IV of Order XXXV of Supreme Court Rules, 1966 says, “1.(1) Every petition under Article 32 of the Constitution shall be in writing and shall be heard by a Division Court of not less than five Judges provided that a petition which does not raise a substantial question of Law as to the interpretation of the Constitution may be heard and decided by a Division Court of less than five Judges, and, during vacation, by the vacation Judge sitting singly. (2) All interlocutory and miscellaneous applications connected with a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution, may be heard and decided by a Division Court of less than five Judges, and, during vacation, by the vacation Judge sitting singly, notwithstanding that in the petition a substantial question of Law as to the interpretation of Constitution is raised.”
That the Writ Petition which has been dismissed by the Order, against which Review Petition is hereby moved, did raise ‘substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution and this Hon’ble Court was not required to decide any ‘interlocutory and miscellaneous application’ ‘connected with the petition’. The humble Petitioner had submitted this in his Writ Petition, pleadings/arguments and through written submission followed by interlocutory application for constitution bench on 18.10.2016 vide diary no. 77878.
That a well-designed criminal conspiracy being commissioned and strategy being adopted against the petitioner by the Quasi-Judicial Officer of this Hon’ble Court to spoil the valid ground of the case and make it liable to be dismissal with liberty by this Hon’ble Court and to close the door of the Hon’ble Apex Court under Article 32 for enforcement of guaranteed fundamental right of the petitioner under Article 21.
Remove truth from petition "Planned Judicial Murder" & remark against Hon'ble Justice Mr. Ranaj Gogoi who is supposed to be our next Chief Justice of India then Supreme Court of India will register the Criminal Appeal
Petition before Hon'ble President of India dated 27.07.2017Om Prakash Poddar
Petition before Hon'ble President of India AFTER the Writ Petition (Criminal)D 3913 of 2017 before Supreme Court of India against Registrar Supreme Court of India for shielding Judicial Magistrate of Begusarai of Bihar
Petition before Prime Minister of India dated 23.08.2017Om Prakash Poddar
WITH A PRAYER TO IMPEACH THE CONCERNED JUDGES FOR ISSUING NON BAIL ABLE WARRANT (N. B. W) DATED 08TH SEPT 2011 UNDER SECTION 83 CR.PC. IN CRIMINAL CASE COMPLAINT (P) NO 5591 OF 2013 AT SDJM COURT NO. 16 BEGUSARAI BIHAR AND KEEPING IT SECRET SINCE THEN EVEN AFTER THE ON RECORD INTIMATION TO THE CJM DIVISION BEGUSARAI IN THE SAME MATTER CRIMINAL CASE COMPLAINT (P) NO. 9P OF 2010 DATED 03RD MARCH 2011 AND AFTER THE SETTLEMENT OF THE SAME MATTER BY THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI IN MATT APPL 7 OF 2012 ON 23RD JULY 2013
WE ARE LIVING AS REFUGEE IN DELHI BECAUSE OF FORCED DISLOCATION BY THE STATE
THE PETITION WITHOUT SOFT COPY OF ANNEXURES AS HARD COPY OF SAME ANNEXURES FROM P 1 TO P 18 HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED BEFORE HON'BLE PRESIDENT OF INDIA WITH THE PETITION Sl. No. P1/ B/ 0108170053 ON 27TH JULY 2017
M.A.D.No.15192 dated 20.07.2020 before Supreme Court of IndiaOm Prakash Poddar
Last Posthumous Petition filed along with Petitioner no.02 Srmt. Asha Rani Devi against in-built corruption in Law Enforcement agencies which explains as to how Custodian of Law became the killer of Petitioner no.02 Srmt. Asha Rani Devi and remained unpunished till date.
First appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Registrar (J-I) Supreme Court of Indi...Om Prakash Poddar
First appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Registrar (J-I) Supreme Court of India for REFUSAL OF REGISTRATION OF WRIT CRIMINAL AGAINST UNION OF INDIA D.NO.2188 OF 2017
Aggrieved by the reply of Adl. Registrar & CPIO, Supreme Court of India dated 04.03.2017, appellant preferred First Appeal against CPIO of Supreme Court of India dated 07.03.2017 before Ld. Registrar (Admin) & First Appellate Authority (FAA) Supreme Court of India at New Delhi.
SC judge fines petitioner Rs0.1m for wasting 13 years of opponent in fake caseGibran Ashraf
The Supreme Court of Pakistan (SCP) Justice Mansoor Ali Shah on Saturday slapped a Rs100,000 fine on petitioner for filing an unnecessary and false case and that entangled a citizen for 13 years.
Read the full story here: https://www.samaaenglish.tv/news/40026387/pakistan-sc-judge-fines-petitioner-rs01m-for-wasting-13-years-of-opponent-in-fake-case
Reply to Election Commission Delhi in NGS5322435639 dated 25.11.2022.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
ERO Ms. Sunita Raj mobile no. 9650058340 59-Vishwas Nagar Constituency Sahadra district at East Delhi has admitted this fact that she has sent her man for making a fake voters under the legal guardianship of Complainant on 24.11.2022 at Shelter Home DUSIB Code No.214 near Anand Vihar ISBT Delhi. Hence, your BLO will disclose the name and address of person for whom he wanted to make fake Voter ID with ulterior motives.
112 call has been made against your fraud BLO dated 24.11.2022 with unique reference no. 6161038, PCR Petrol Vehicle ROMO9A mobile no. 7428002509 at 19.32.34pm. Anand Vihar policeman mobile number is 8595888677. Police had taken him to the police station. Hence police has recorded his name and address and motives behind it.
Inquiry officer Balveer Singh mobile no. 9654963400 of Patpatganj Industrial Area Police Station near Anand Vihar ISBT Delhi will provide you the name and address of person who had come to make a fake voters under the legal guardianship of Complainant.
Your fraud BLO did not disclose his identity before complainant.
Complaint dated 27.11.2022 to Commissioner of Polic Delhi.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
TAKE the cognizance of obvious links between Ms. Sunita Raj, BLO Anand Vihar and Mr. Manish Raj with this International Sex Racket and direct to concern SHO to register an F.I.R against the accused under relevant sections of IPC.
112 call dated 24.11.2022 at 19.32.34pm with unique reference no. 6161038 and subsequent Complaint dated 25.11.2022 to the Commissioner of Police Delhi dated 25.11.2022 discloses links with Mr. Manish Raj son of Chief Minister of Jharkhand in this International Sex Racket
Suppression of crucial records in Office Report dated 26.11.2022 in W.P. (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 listed for hearing on 28.11.2022 before Chamber Judge HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, Court No.15 CL.NO.1748 may lead to dismissal of petition.
Registry has only recorded the records to defend its heinous work in the Office Report dated 26.11.2022 hiding all the factual crucial records filed by the petitioner even after his reminder though e-filed letter dated 22.11.2022 addressed to Branch Officer and Assistant Registrar Section X
Office Report dated 26.11.2022 in International Sex Racket matter Writ Petit...Om Prakash Poddar
Registry has recorded records in his favor only and has ignored the crucial records of petitioner deliberately to dismiss the petition by default.
Office Report dated 26.11.2022 for the hearing of Writ Petition Criminal Diary No. 18646/2022 on 28.11.2022 has been made hiding the crucial records filed by the petitioner.
Office Report dated 28.11.2022 in International Sex Racket matter Writ Petit...Om Prakash Poddar
Office Report has been made hiding crucial records of petitioner. Registry has recorded his own record only and has deliberately ignored the record of petitioner to dismiss the petition by default.
Complaint dated 26.11.22 against Election Officer Katihar Bihar.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
a fake voter identity card has been created by BLO Part-220, Ward No.03, 64-Kadwa Constituency Katihar Bihar vide EPIC No. TYGO395244 against the Complainant. Complainant has figured out malpractices of BLO and submitted requisite form before BLO Gopal Malik mobile no. 9507949474 dated 17.12.2021 for deletion of his name from the voter list to suppress the practice of multiple voter identity cards across the Country.
Complaint dated 25.11.22 against Election Officer Sahadra Delhi.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
Sex abuser Manish from Election Commission Delhi took my Aadhar Card by fraud to make Voter ID for my kidnapped minor daughter marking me as a legal guardian under Vishwas Nagar Constituency at Sahadra district of East Delhi.
Praying from you to direct the registry to supply the fixed date of hearing to the petitioner in person in writing in Non Bailable and Gang Rape matter W.P. Criminal Diary No. 18546/2022 so that he can plan his travel for home
Letter dated 22.11.2022 to Branch Officer Section 10 at Supreme Court of Ind...Om Prakash Poddar
Take all 84 e-filed legal documents with effect from 07.06.2022 to 22.11.2022 along with physical filed legal document with effect from 14.06.2022 to till date on Record of office report for the date of hearing on 25.11.2022
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 25.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed deliberately by Supreme Court of India with ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 25.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional filed Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed by Supreme Court of India with an ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Additional e-Filed Petition dated 07.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Sup...Om Prakash Poddar
All additional filed Annexures, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments have been suppressed by Supreme Court of India with ulterior motive which are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
E-Filed Petition dated 07.06.2022 on Anti-Prostitution before Supreme Court ...Om Prakash Poddar
All Annexes, letters, miscellaneous documents, I.A. for written arguments are supportive of Gang Rape report filed from ground zero level either from Bihar or from Delhi.
Petitioner has e-filed 10 legal documents on 7.6.2022 and 84 Additional legal documents till 22.11.2022 in Provisional Application no. 12939-2022 and Writ Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 before Supreme Court of India which has not been taken into record of office report dated 24.09.2022 and has not been entered into Writ Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 18546/2022 at the website in the public domain. Hence, crucial records have been suppressed deliberately with ulterior motive.
Complaint dated 21.11.2022 against Bihar and Delhi police to NHRC.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
#Internationalsexracket
National Human Rights Commission New Delhi, take action against kidnapping, abduction and Gang Rape of my families and minor daughters.
E-filed status dated 15.11.22 before Supreme Court of India.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
E-filed Important legal documents like Interlocutory Applications for additional grounds and cancellation of Non Bailable Warrant has not been entered into Physical filing case record Writ Petition Criminal Diary No. 18546/2022 to present the wrong fact before the Chamber Judge on 25.11.2022
Complaint aginst Delhi Police to NHRC New Delhi dated 20.11.22.pdfOm Prakash Poddar
ABDUCTION/RAPE by Police
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Hence, register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
ABDUCTION/RAPE by Police case.
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters. Hence, register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
Register F.I.R against these five people to interrogate in this matter.
Surender Narayan Poddar, Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar, Advocate Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari Advocate Sunil Ojha is key person who will reveal all records of this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Register an F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court at New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court at New Delhi.
Writ Petition Criminal Diary Number 18546 of 2022 Part-I .pdfOm Prakash Poddar
International Sex Racket and Anti-Prostitution Petition before Supreme Court of India.
These five are key people and will reveal all records in this sex racket to rescue my minor daughters.
Register F.I.R and interrogate Shri Surender Narayan Poddar Assitant Manager Marketing Division IOCL Barauni Refinery Begusarai Bihar, my advocate Shri Sunil Ojha in HMA-678/2010 case at Dwarka Court New Delhi, my wife Rina Kumari’s advocate Shri Gopal Prasad and his wife Veena Kumari in 9P/2010 case at Begusarai Court Bihar and Rajput advocate of Purnea Bihar in HMA-678/2010 case Goshwara No. 83)H at Dwarka Court New Delhi.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the Netherlands
Appeal against Lodgment Order of Registrar SCI under Order XV Rule 5 of SCI Rules 2013
1. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO. OF 2017
Appeal by way of motion against the Lodgment Order dated
16.02.2017 by this Hon’ble Court with A Prayer for
Enforcement of Fundamental Rights.
IN THE MATTER OF:
OM PRAKASH & ANR …………..PETITIONER
VERSUS
REGISTRAR ….RESPONDENT
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ANR
CRL.M.P. NO. OF 2017
APPLICATION FOR SEEKING PERMISSION TO SUBMIT
CORRECTED PARA 5 OF THE PERFORMA FOR FIRST LISTING
AGAINST APPEAL BY WAY OF MOTION AGAINST THE
LODGEMENT ORDER DATED 16.02.2017
PAPER BOOK
(FOR INDEX KINDLY SEE INSIDE)
PETITIONER IN PERSON
OM PRAKASH
2. FILING INDEX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRL.M.P. NO. OF 2017
IN
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO. OF 2017 D.NO.3913
WITH
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO.OF 2017 D.NO.2188
WITH
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO.136 OF 2016
AND
WRIT PETITON CIVIL NO. 90 OF 2016
IN THE MATTER OF:
OM PRAKASH & ANR ……..PETITIONER
VERSUS
REGISTRAR ….RESPONDENT
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ANR
S.N Particulars Copies Court Fees
1. Memo of Appearance 1
2. Appeal with Affidavit 1+3
3. Annexure P-1 1+3
4. Application for submission of
corrected listing Performa
1+3
Petitioner in Person
Filed on: 20.02.2017 (Om Prakash)
Diary No: 16166
Filed on: 23.02.2017
Diary No: 17593
(Widow Asha Rani Devi)
On behalf of Petitioner No.02
3. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRL.M.P. NO. OF 2017
IN
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO.OF 2017 D.NO.3913
WITH
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO.OF 2017 D.NO.2188
WITH
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO.136 OF 2016
AND
WRIT PETITON CIVIL NO. 90 OF 2016
IN THE MATTER OF:
OM PRAKASH & ANR ……..PETITIONER
VERSUS
REGISTRAR ….RESPONDENT
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ANR
APPEAL BY WAY OF MOTION AGAINST THE
LODGEMENT ORDER DATED 16.02.2017 VIDE
D.NO.3913 OF 2017 ISSUED BY REGISTRAR
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA UNDER ORDER XV RULE
5 OF THE SUPREME COURT RULES, 2013.
To
Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India and
His Lordship's Companion Justices of
the Supreme Court of India. The
Humble petition of the Petitioner
abovenamed.
MOST RESPECFULLY SHOWETH:
1. That the present petition under
Article 32 of the Constitution of India is being
filed to enforce the Rights under Article 21 of
the Constitution of India with Writ Petition
4. Criminal vide D.NO. 3913 of 2017, Writ Petition
Criminal vide D.NO. 2188 of 2017, Writ Petition
Criminal 136 of 2016 and Writ Petition Civil 90 of
2016; whereby Registrar (J-I) of this Hon’ble
court has refused to register Writ Petition
(Criminal) No………. of 2017 (D.No. 3913) under
Article 32 of Constitution of India titled as “Om
Prakash & Anr Vs. Registrar, Supreme Court of
India & Anr” on the ground of no reasonable cause
received for registration under order XV, Rule 5
of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 which has
suspended the fundamental rights of the
petitioners under Article 21 and closed the door
of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioners
forever, the contents of which are requested to be
read as part of this application, as the same are
not being repeated here for the sake of brevity.
2. That the Lodgement Order dated
16.02.2017 vide diary no. 3913 of 2017 issued by
Registrar, Supreme Court of India under Order XV
Rule 5 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 has been
annexed herein as Annexure P-1 (Page from 12 to
14).
3. That the Lodgement Order dated 16.02.2017 of
Registrar, Supreme Court of India has thoroughly
5. misconceived that the main grounds espoused by the
petitioners are that the Registrar did not have
power to refuse registration of the earlier Writ
petition filed by the petitioner under the
provision of Order XV, Rule 5 of Supreme Court
Rules, 2013, the petition having been diarized as
Diary No. 2188 of 2017.
4. That the provision of Order XV, Rule 5 of
Supreme Court Rules, 2013 clearly stipulates, “The
Registrar may refuse to receive a petition on the
ground that it discloses no reasonable cause or is
frivolous or contains scandalous matter but the
petitioner may within fifteen days of the making of
such order, appeal by way of motion, from such
refusal to the Court”.
5. That the main ground espoused by the
petitioners are that the Registrar of this Hon’ble
Court has thoroughly abused his power under the
provision of Order XV, Rule 5 of Supreme Court
Rules, 2013 and has intentionally ignored the valid
new reasonable cause/findings in the garb of no
reasonable cause/same findings to be received for
registration under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme
Court Rules, 2013 to protect and shield the bad
elements of state apparatus and to offend, harass,
6. victimize, infringe constitutional right of
petitioners, suspend the right to life or personal
liberty of the petitioners.
6. That the Lodgement Order dated 16.02.2017
of Registrar, Supreme Court of India has thoroughly
misconceived that the petition is not permissible
in law; an Statutory appeal, instead should have
been filed by the petitioners.
7. That the Registrar, Supreme Court of India has
failed to take into account that his Lodgement
Orders dated 28.01.2017 and 16.02.2017 have awarded
Capital punishment/death penalty to the petitioners
indirectly without a written Judicial Order of this
final Court. Moreover, in absence of written
Judicial Order of Capital Punishment, the
petitioners cannot now even move for mercy petition
before Hon’ble the President of India.
8. That the Lodgement Order dated 16.02.2017 of
Registrar, Supreme Court of India has thoroughly
misconceived that Writ petition is not permissible
in law, however “Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 137
of 2010 in C. Muniappan & ORS VS. The Registrar of
Supreme Court of India, Writ Petition (Criminal)
No. 52 of 2011 in B.A. Umesh VS. The Registrar of
7. Supreme Court of India, Writ Petition (Criminal)
No. 77 of 2014 in Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq VS. The
Registrar of Supreme Court of India & ORS, Writ
(Criminal) 108 of 2014 in Yakub Abdul Razak Menon
VS. The Registrar of Supreme Court of India & ORS”
has been permitted in law by this Hon’ble Court.
9. That being aggrieved by the order dated
16.02.2017 of Registrar (J-I) of this Hon’ble
Court, the petitioner is challenging the same on
the following amongst other grounds: -
a)BECAUSE the Writ petition is permissible and
maintainable in law as the same has been
permitted by this Hon’ble Court in the past in
number of cases with citation under para 8 of
this appeal.
b)BECAUSE there is a sheer violation of set
practice, procedure and rules against Writ
Criminal 136 of 2016 by the Registry of this
Hon’ble Court as laid down in the Handbook of
this Hon’ble Court to stop the petitioner no.
02 to agitate the matter before Hon’ble the
Chief Justice of India’s Court.
8. c)BECAUSE the Registry has circulated an
application for Constitution bench unregistered
in Writ Criminal 136 of 2016 and forcibly
pushed the petitioner into Curative Stage.
d)BECAUSE a well-designed criminal conspiracy
being commissioned and strategy being adopted
against the petitioners by the Quasi-Judicial
Officer of this Hon’ble Court since 03.10.2016
to spoil the valid ground of Constitution bench
against the Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016
and make it liable to be dismissed with liberty
by this Hon’ble Court and to close the door of
this Hon’ble Court under Article 32 for
enforcement of guaranteed fundamental right of
the petitioner under Article 21.
e)BECAUSE the petitioners have been subjected to
violation of principle of Natural Justice by
this Hon’ble Court who approached this Hon’ble
Apex Court under Article 32 against rampant
atrocities by the state apparatus in two states
and for enforcement of his fundamental rights
under Article 21.
f)BECAUSE the petitioners are NOT re-agitating
the same petition however petitioners have been
9. stopped by this Hon’ble Court since 03.10.2016
to agitate the matter at right place before
Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court as
per the set practice, procedure and rules of
this Hon’ble Court.
g)BECAUSE new reasonable cause and new findings
have arisen and resulted by this Hon’ble Court.
h)BECAUSE there is evasion of Order XXXVIII of
Supreme Court Rules 2013 against Writ Criminal
136 of 2016 by two judges’ bench.
i)BECAUSE there is likelihood of bias against
Writ Criminal 136 of 2016 by the two judges’
bench as laid down in the Yadav Vs. State of
Haryana AIR 1987 SC 454.
j)BECAUSE the petitioners have NOT afforded
liberty to approach Patna High Court in Writ
Petition Criminal 136 of 2016, instead the
petitioners have lodged strong protest against
it in the open Court and this Order suffers
from biased and prejudiced judgment by two
judges’ bench of this Hon’ble Court.
10. k)BECAUSE there is sheer violation of
Constitutional Law by this Order and petition
raised substantial question of law as to the
interpretation of the Constitution required and
to be decided by a division court of not less
than five judges.
l)BECAUSE this biased Order awards Capital
Punishment/Death Penalty to the petitioners
indirectly.
m)BECAUSE an offence of perjury by the Lower
Court and bad elements of two State Apparatus
have been placed on record in the petition who
have been posing imminent danger to the life or
personal liberty of the petitioners and
affecting the administration of Justice
delivered by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in
2013.
n)BECAUSE this Hon’ble Court is shielding and
protecting the bad elements of State Apparatus
and offending, harassing, victimizing, awarding
Capital Punishment/Death Penalty without
written Judicial Order indirectly through
violating, evading the Rule of Law initially
and through issuing Lodgment Orders lately,
11. suspending the life or personal liberty of the
petitioners.
PRAYER
It is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble
Court may be pleased to:
(a) To Set aside the Lodgment order dated
16.02.2017 of Registrar Supreme Court of India
and pass an order for registration of the same
and allow the petitioners to agitate the matter
urgently before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of
India’s Court for urgent relief.
b) Pass such other order/orders as this Hon'ble
Court may deem just and proper in the facts
and circumstances of the case.
DRAWN & FILED BY:
PETITIONER IN PERSON
OM PRAKASH
NEW DELHI:
FILED ON : 20.02.2017.
Diary No : 16166
(WIDOW ASHA RANI DEVI)
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER NO.02
12. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRL.M.P. NO. OF 2017
IN
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO.OF 2017 D.NO.3913
WITH
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO.OF 2017 D.NO.2188
WITH
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO.136 OF 2016
AND
WRIT PETITON CIVIL NO. 90 OF 2016
IN THE MATTER OF:
OM PRAKASH & ANR ……..PETITIONER
VERSUS
REGISTRAR ….RESPONDENT
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ANR
AFFIDAVIT
I, Om Prakash S/o Late D. N. Poddar, aged 44 years,
R/o RZF/893, Netaji Subash Marg, Raj Nagar Part-II,
Palam Colony, New Delhi - 77, do hereby solemnly
affirm and state on oath as under:-
1.That I am the Petitioner in the above matter
and well conversant with the facts of the case
as such competent to swear this affidavit.
2. That the contents of the accompanying appeal by
way of motion against the Lodgment Order dated
16.02.2017 of Registrar Supreme Court of India
vide D.NO. 3913 of 2017 under Order XV Rule 5
of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, which has
13. been drafted by me [para 01 to 09.], [Page 01
to 14] and I, As. and having understood the
contents thereof I say that the facts state
therein are correct which are based on the
official record.
3. That the accompanying appeal by way of motion
against the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 of
Registrar Supreme Court of India total 14
pages.’
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:
I, the above-named deponent do hereby verify that
the facts stated in the above affidavit are true to
my knowledge and belief. No part of the same is
false and nothing material has been concealed
therefrom.
Verified at New Delhi on this the 20th
day of
February, 2017.
DEPONENT
14. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRL.M.P. NO. OF 2017
IN
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO.OF 2017 D.NO.3913
WITH
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO.OF 2017 D.NO.2188
WITH
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO.136 OF 2016
AND
WRIT PETITON CIVIL NO. 90 OF 2016
IN THE MATTER OF:
OM PRAKASH & ANR ……..PETITIONER
VERSUS
REGISTRAR ….RESPONDENT
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ANR
APPLICATION FOR SEEKING PERMISSION TO
SUBMIT CORRECTED PARA 5 OF THE PERFORMA
FOR FIRST LISTING AGAINST APPEAL BY WAY OF
MOTION AGAINST THE LODGEMENT ORDER DATED
16.02.2017 VIDE D.NO.3913 OF 2017 ISSUED
BY REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA UNDER
ORDER XV RULE 5 OF THE SUPREME COURT
RULES, 2013.
To
Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India and
His Lordship's Companion Justices of
the Supreme Court of India. The
Humble petition of the Petitioner
abovenamed.
MOST RESPECFULLY SHOWETH:
15. 10. That the present petition under
Article 32 of the Constitution of India is being
filed to enforce the Rights under Article 21 of
the Constitution of India with Writ Petition
Criminal vide D.NO. 3913 of 2017, Writ Petition
Criminal vide D.NO. 2188 of 2017, Writ Petition
Criminal 136 of 2016 and Writ Petition Civil 90 of
2016; whereby Registrar (J-I) of this Hon’ble
court has refused to register Writ Petition
(Criminal) No………. of 2017 (D.No. 3913) under
Article 32 of Constitution of India titled as “Om
Prakash & Anr Vs. Registrar, Supreme Court of
India & Anr” on the ground of no reasonable cause
received for registration under order XV, Rule 5
of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 which has
suspended the fundamental rights of the
petitioners under Article 21 and closed the door
of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioners
forever, the contents of which are requested to be
read as part of this application, as the same are
not being repeated here for the sake of brevity.
11. That the corrected para 5 of the
Performa for first listing against Appeal by way
of motion against Lodgement Order dated 16.02.2017
vide diary no. 3913 of 2017 issued by Registrar,
Supreme Court of India under Order XV Rule 5 of
16. the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 has been annexed
herein as Annexure P-1 (Page from 07 to 08).
12. That the para 5 of the Performa for the first
listing has been corrected and hence Appeal Crl.
M.P. No……..of 2017 NOT TO BE LISTED BEFORE: Hon’ble
Justice Navin Sinha; Hon’ble Justice Ranjan Gagoi;
Hon’ble Justice Prafulla Chandra Pant; Hon’ble
Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose and Hon’ble Justice
Uday Umesh Lalit.
13. That there is likelihood of bias against Writ
Criminal 136 of 2016 by the two judges’ bench as
laid down in the Yadav Vs. State of Haryana AIR
1987 SC 454.
PRAYER
It is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble
Court may be pleased to:
(a) Allow the petitioners to submit a
corrected para 5 of the Performa for first
listing against the Appeal by way of
motion against Lodgement Order dated
16.02.2017 vide diary no. 3913 of 2017
issued by Registrar, Supreme Court of
India under Order XV Rule 5 of the Supreme
Court Rules, 2013 for consideration of
17. para 03 of this petition/application by
this Hon'ble Court as the same is very
necessary in the interest & furtherance of
justice.
b) Pass such other order/orders as this Hon'ble
Court may deem just and proper in the facts
and circumstances of the case.
DRAWN & FILED BY:
PETITIONER IN PERSON
OM PRAKASH
NEW DELHI:
FILED ON : 23.02.2017.
DIARY NO : 17593
(WIDOW ASHA RANI DEVI)
ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER NO.02
18. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRL.M.P. NO. OF 2017
IN
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO.OF 2017 D.NO.3913
WITH
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO.OF 2017 D.NO.2188
WITH
WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL NO.136 OF 2016
AND
WRIT PETITON CIVIL NO. 90 OF 2016
IN THE MATTER OF:
OM PRAKASH & ANR ……..PETITIONER
VERSUS
REGISTRAR ….RESPONDENT
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA & ANR
AFFIDAVIT
I, Om Prakash S/o Late D. N. Poddar, aged 44 years,
R/o RZF/893, Netaji Subash Marg, Raj Nagar Part-II,
Palam Colony, New Delhi - 77, do hereby solemnly
affirm and state on oath as under:-
3.That I am the Petitioner in the above matter
and well conversant with the facts of the case
as such competent to swear this affidavit.
4. That the contents of the accompanying
application for seeking permission to submit
corrected para 5 of the Performa for first
listing against appeal by way of motion against
the Lodgment Order dated 16.02.2017 of
Registrar Supreme Court of India vide D.NO.
3913 of 2017 under Order XV Rule 5 of the
19. Supreme Court Rules, 2013, which has been
drafted by me [para 01 to 04.],[Page 01 to 04 ]
and I, As. and having understood the contents
thereof I say that the facts state therein are
correct which are based on the official record.
3. That the accompanying application for seeking
permission to submit corrected para 5 of the
Performa for first listing total 08 pages.’
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION:
I, the above-named deponent do hereby verify that
the facts stated in the above affidavit are true to
my knowledge and belief. No part of the same is
false and nothing material has been concealed
therefrom.
Verified at New Delhi on this the 23rd
day of
February, 2017.
DEPONENT